W912PL-17-R-0025_Amendment0004.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICAITON NO. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicble)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

FACILITY CODE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICIATION NO.

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a)By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment your desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPIRATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc. ) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15C. DATE SIGNED

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION ( Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

PAGE OF PAGES

6. ISSUED BY CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)

CODE

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

Previous edition unusable Amendment 0001

1 49

0004 27 Mar 17

W912PL

U.S Army Corps of Engineers,Los Angeles Dist CESPL-CTE, East Region Branch 915 Wilshire Blvd.

Los Angeles, CA 90017

W912PL-17-R-0025

8 February 2017

DESIGN/BUILD F-35A BOMB BUILD-UP FACILITY, LUKE AFB, AZ

The purpose of this amendment is to remove/replace several sections of the specifications and add two documents.

1. REMOVE/REPLACE FOLLOWING SECTIONS: 00 20 00 INSTRUCTIONS FOR PROCUREMENT; 00 22 00 SUPPLEMENTARY INSTRUCTIONS; 00 22 16 SUPPLEMENTARY INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS; 00 73 00

SUPPLEMENTARY CONDITIONS; STANDARD FORM 1442; STANDARD FORM 30

2. ADD PROJECT LOCATION HAUL ROUTE AND SITE OVERVIEW (653880)

F-35 BOMB BUILD-UP PAD W912PL-17-R-0025

Luke Air Force Base, AZ Amendment 0004

SF 30 CONTINUATION PAGE 1 OF 1

SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

DIVISION 00 - PROCUREMENT AND CONTRACTING REQUIREMENTS

Section Number Section Title

SF 1442 SOLICITATION, OFFER AND AWARD FORM

00 20 00 INSTRUCTIONS FOR PROCUREMENT

00 22 00 SUPPLEMENTARY INSTRUCTIONS

00 22 16 SUPPLEMENTARY INSTRUCTINOS TO PROPOSERS

00 73 00 SUPPLEMENTARY CONDITIONS

DIVISION 01 – 48 - TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS

Not applicable to this amendment.

DRAWINGS

Sheet Number

Sheet Title File Number

C-100 PROJECT LOCATION AND HAUL ROUTE N/A

C-101 SITE OVERVIEW PLAN N/A

SOLICITATION, OFFER,

AND AWARD

(Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

1. SOLICITATION NUMBER 2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

SEALED BID (IFB)

NEGOTIATED (RFP)

3. DATE ISSUED PAGE OF PAGES

IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by the offeror.

4. CONTRACT NUMBER 5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NUMBER 6. PROJECT NUMBER

7. ISSUED BY CODE 8. ADDRESS OFFER TO

9. FOR INFORMATION CALL

A. NAME B. TELEPHONE NUMBER (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS)

SOLICITATION

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".

10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS (Title, identifying number, date):

11. The Contractor shall begin performance within calendar days and complete it within calendar days after receiving award, notice to proceed. This performance period is mandatory, negotiable. (See .)

12A. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE PAYMENT BONDS?

(If "YES," indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12B.)

12B. CALENDAR DAYS

YES NO

13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:

A. Sealed offers in original and copies to perform the work required are due at the place specified in Item 8 by (hour) local time (date). If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers will be publicly opened at that time. Sealed envelopes containing offers shall be marked to show the offeror’s name and address, the solicitation number, and the date and time offers are due.

B. An offer guarantee is, is not required.

C. All offers are subject to the (1) work requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.

D. Offers providing less than calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due will not be considered and will be rejected.

NSN 7540-01-155-3212

Designed using Perform Pro, WHS/DIOR, Oct 96

1442-103 STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 4-85) (EG)

Prescribed by GSA - FAR (48 CFR) 53.236-1(d)

W912PL-17-R-0025 Am4 X

8 Feb 2017 1 OF 2

USACE, Los Angeles District Contracting Division, East Region Branch 915 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 930 Attn: CESPL-CT-E Los Angeles, CA 90053-2325

See Item 7

Otse A. Adikhai (213) 452-3248

This is a design-build project to support the F-35 Bomb Build-up Pad at Luke Air Force Base, Arizona.

F-35 BOMB BUILD-UP FACILITY DESCRIPTION:

Construction of a new Ancillary Explosive Facility; a concrete pad (250'x250' rated at 3,000 PSI) to support Bomb Preload Station/Munitions Assembly Conveyor (MAC II); a covered structure (150' x 150' 26' minimum height access from all sides). Covered structure must be positioned lengthwise paralleling West edge of pad, 25' from nearest South and West edges); a catenary lightning protection system, a holding pad; a new MSA perimeter fence, and a small Administration Building.

Facilities will be designed as permanent construction in accordance with the DoD Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC) 1-200-01. This project will comply with DoD antiterrorism/force protection requirements per UFC 4-010-01.

The estimated cost range of this procurement is $5,000,000-$10,000,000. This is a competitive Women Owned Small Businesses Set Aside; all responsible sources may submit an offer.

10 See 001000

X X *Section 00 10 00

X 10

3 2 PM

30 March 2017 x

OFFER (Must be fully completed by offeror)

STANDARD FORM 1442 BACK (REV. 4-85)

14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR (Include ZIP Code) 15. TELEPHONE NUMBER (Include area code)

16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS (Include only if different than Item 14)

CODE FACILITY CODE

17. The offeror agrees to perform the work required at the prices specified below in strict accordance with the terms of this solicitation, if this offer is accepted by the Government in writing within calendar days after the date offers are due. (Insert any number equal or greater than the minimum requirement stated in 13D. Failure to insert any number means the offeror accepts the minimum in Item 13D.)

AMOUNTS

18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.

19. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF AMENDMENTS

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation - give number and date of each)

AMENDMENT NO.

DATE

20A. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN OFFER (Type or print) 20B. SIGNATURE 20C. OFFER DATE

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

21. ITEMS ACCEPTED

22. AMOUNT 23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

24.SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN

(4 copies unless otherwise specified)

ITEM 25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PURSUANT TO

10 U.S.C. 2304(c) ( ) 41 U.S.C. 253(c) ( )

26. ADMINISTERED BY 27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BYCODE

CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE

28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT (Contractor is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.) Contractor agrees to furnish and deliver all items or perform all work requirements identified on this form and any continuation sheets for the consideration stated in this contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract shall be governed by (a) this contract award, (b) the solicitation, and

(c) the clauses, representations, certifications, and specifications incorporated by reference in or attached to this contract.

29. AWARD. (Contractor is not required to sign this document.) Your offer on this solicitation is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This award consummates the contract, which consists of (a) the Government solicitation and your offer, and (b) this contract award. No further contractual document is necessary.

30A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN

(Type or print)

30B. SIGNATURE 30C. DATE

31A. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

31B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 31C. AWARD DATE

BY

DUNS NO.: TAX ID NO.:

CAGE CODE NO.:

( ) - ; FAX ( ) -

SEE PRICING SCHEDULE

Luke Air Force Base, AZ

00 20 00 - 1 Amendment 0004

00 20 00 INSTRUCTIONS FOR PROCUREMENT

1. EVALUATION: The Government intends to issue a contract resulting from the Request for Proposal (RFP) to the responsible Offeror whose proposal represents the Best Value to the Government by using the Trade-Off procedure as described in Sections 00 22 00 and 00 22 16.

2. Award of all Base Bid will be made to one offeror. Prices must be submitted on all individual items of the Price Schedule. Offeror must propose on all items. Failure to do so may cause the proposal to be determined Awardable.

3. Performance Period: The Offeror shall complete and propose on all Base Bid items in the Price Schedule to correspond with the completion time in calendar days after receipt of Notice To Proceed (NTP) as specified in Section 00 73 00, Special Contract Requirements, Clause 52.211-10, Commencement, Prosecution and Completion of Work.

4. If a modification to a price is submitted which provides for an adjustment to the total amount, the application of adjustment to each item in the Price Schedule must be stated. If it is not stated, the offeror agrees that the adjustment shall be applied on a pro rata basis to every item in the Price Schedule.

5. The Offeror shall distribute his indirect costs (overhead, profit, bond, etc.,) over all items in the

Price Schedule. The Government will review the submitted Price Schedule for any unbalancing of the items. Any submitted Price Schedule determined to be unbalanced may cause the offeror to be ineligible for contract award.

6. The Job (J.A) line items are not “estimated quantity” line items and therefore are not subject to the Variation in Quantity contract clause.

7. For the purpose of initial evaluation of offers, the following will be utilized in resolving arithmetic discrepancies found on the face of the Price Schedule as submitted by the offeror:

a. Obviously misplaced decimal points will be corrected;

b. In case of discrepancy between the unit price and the extended price, the unit price will govern;

c. Apparent errors in extensions of unit prices will be corrected;

d. Apparent errors in addition of lump sum and extended prices will be corrected.

8. The Contract Clause 52.232-27, "Prompt Payment for Construction Contracts" requires that the name and address of the contractor official, to whom payment is to be sent, be the same as that in the contract or in a proper Notice of Assignment.

00 20 00 - 2

9. Payment of Electronic Funds Transfer (EFT) is the mandatory method of payment.

The Contractors attention is directed to Contract Clause No. 52.232-33 "Mandatory Information for Electronic Funds Transfer" located in Section 00 73 00.

10. PROGRESS PAYMENT REQUESTS made by the Contractor pursuant to the provisions of

Contract Clause, PAYMENTS UNDER FIXED-PRICE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS, shall be submitted on ENG FORM 93 to the administration office as designated in Block 26, Standard Form 1442 Back, Solicitation, Offer and Award. ENG FORM 93 shall be submitted to that office on the 20th day of each month in appropriate form and certified. Photocopies of the form shall be furnished on that same date to the Corps of Engineers offices designated at the Pre-Construction Conference.

11. Principal Contracting Officer. The Contracting Officer who signs this contract will be the

Principal Contracting Officer for this contract. However, any Contracting Officer assigned to the Los Angeles District, Contracting Division within his authority, may take formal action on this contract when the Principal Contracting Officer is unavailable and the action needs to be taken.

12. Amounts and prices shall be indicated in either words or figures, NOT BOTH.

13. Offeror is cautioned to check Price Schedule carefully prior to submission. If the Price Schedule contains unit prices, they should be round off to the second decimal point only NOT

EXTENDED FURTHER.

14. The Offeror shall furnish all design and engineering effort, plant, labor, material, equipment, etc., necessary to perform all work in strict accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in the contract in include all attachments thereto.

17. Contractor is required to fill in CAGE CODE and DUNS NUMBER (Reference

Section 00 70 00, entitled System Acquisition Management (SAM) in Block No 15 on Standard Form 1442, Name and Address Block (Cage Code under Cage and DUNS No. under Duns respectively).

18. PLEASE NOTE: The Contractor agrees to attend any Post Award conference convened by the contracting activity or contract administration in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation subpart 42.5.0

00 20 00 - 3

19. CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS. In accordance with the provisions of Subpart 36.201(Evaluation of Contractor Performance) of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), construction contractor’s performance shall be evaluated throughout the performance of the contract. The United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) follows the procedures outlined in Engineering Regulation 415-1-17 to fulfill this FAR requirement for construction contracts awarded at or above $700,000.00, the USACE Contracting Officer Representative (COR) will evaluate contractor’s performance and prepare a performance report using the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), which is now a web-based system. After an evaluation (interim or final) is written up by the USACE, COR the contractor will have the ability to access, review and comment on the evaluation for a period of 30 days. Accessing and using Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) requires specific software, called PKI certification, which is installed on the user’s computer. The certification is a Department of Defense requirement and was implemented to provide security in electronic transactions. The certification software could cost approximately $110 - $125 per certificate per year and is purchased from an External Certificate Authorities (ECA) vendor. Current information about the PKI certification process and for contacting vendors can be found on the web site:http://www.cpars.navy.mil/.If the Contractor wishes to participate in the performance evaluation process, access to CPARSCASS and PKI certification is the sole responsibility of the Contractor.

20. PLEASE NOTE: ALL PROSPECTIVE OFFERORS MUST BE REGISTERED IN

SYSTEM FOR AWARD MANAGEMENT (SAM)

https://www.sam.gov/portal/public/SAM/

21. LEED Silver Certification is not required, however following LEED Principles is required and a LEED Checklist is provided in Appendix M.

22. Section 00 70 00, Clause 52.219-4 NOTICE OF PRICE EVALUATION PREFERENCE FOR HUBZONE SMALL BUSINESS CONCERNS (JAN 2011) Cessation of Small Disadvantaged Business Price Evaluation Adjustment. In accordance with DoD Class Deviation 2010-00006, the SDB Price Evaluation Adjustment referenced in FAR 52.219-4 in Section 00 70 00 does not apply to this solicitation.

F‐35 BOMB BUILD‐UP PAD W912PL‐17‐R‐0025

00 22 00 ‐Page 1

SECTION 00 22 00

SUPPLEMENTARY INSTRUCTIONS

1.0. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS AND INSTRUCTIONS: …………..…………………………

1.1. GENERAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS: ..……………………………………………………...2

1.2. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS: ………………………………………………………………………….2

1.3. WHERE TO SUBMIT: ………………………………………………………………………………….2

1.4. SUBMISSION DEADLINE: ……………………………………………………………………………2

1.5 SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE PRICE PROPOSAL (VOLUME ): …………………………..3

1.8. PROPOSAL COVER SHEET: …………………………………………………………………………5

00 22 00 ‐Page 2

SECTION 00 22 00

SUPPLEMENTARY INSTRUCTIONS

1.0. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS AND INSTRUCTIONS

1.1. GENERAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

1.1.1. In order to effectively and equitably evaluate all offers, the Contracting Officer must receive information sufficiently detailed that clearly responds to the technical evaluation factors in Section 00 22 16.

1.1.2. Each Offeror must submit a Price Proposal, Volume I, and a Technical Proposal Volume II as separate distinct volumes. The Price Proposal, and Technical Proposal, must be received by the closing date and time set for receipt of proposals.

1.1.3. All information intended by the Offeror to be evaluated must be submitted as part of the Technical Proposal. No proposed price information should be included in the response to the technical evaluation factors.

1.2. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS:

1.2.1. All written portions: Use only 8 ½ by 11 inch paper, unless another size is specifically authorized elsewhere in this section for a particular submission. Do not use 11” x 14” or 11” x 17” size sheets (e.g., fold-outs) unless specifically authorized in this section for a particular submission. W e e x p e c t 1 1 ” x 1 7 ” s i z e s h e e t s f o r s c h e d u l e a n d d r a w i n g s , b u t n o t h i n g e l s e . Do not use a font size smaller than 10, an unusual font style such as script, or condensed print.

1.2.2. All drawing sheets: 22” x 34” (1/2 size 11”x17”), 24" x 36" or 30" x 42" format. Full or half- size sets are acceptable, but must include a minimum of one (1) full-size set; half-size sets must be readable.

1.2.3. Three-ring binders are preferred. Do not use spring clamps or exceed the recommended capacity of the fastener or binder. Do not use plastic multi-hole/spiral binding systems, heat binding systems, or other systems which do not facilitate the ready insertion of additional pages.

1.2.4. “Confidential” projects cannot be submitted to demonstrate capability unless all of the information required for evaluation as specified herein can nonetheless be provided to the Government as part of the Offeror’s technical proposal. Offerors that include in their proposals information that they do not want disclosed to the public for any purpose, or used by the Government except for evaluation purposes, must be clearly marked in accordance with the instructions at FAR 52.215-1, “Instructions to Offeror— Competitive Acquisition”, paragraph (3), “Restriction on disclosure and use of data”.

1.2.5. Offerors must provide one (1) CD Rom disk of all the following Design Technical Criteria (AutoCAD 2000 & MS WORD 2000) and Offerors Performance Capability with technical proposal. Offerors will not be required to submit electronic copies of catalog cuts.

1.3. WHERE TO SUBMIT:

1.3.1. Offeror(s) shall submit their proposal packages to the Los Angeles District Corps of Engineers (COE) as directed by the Request for Proposal and in accordance with Section 00 21 16.

00 22 00 ‐Page 3

1.4. SUBMISSION DEADLINE:

1.4.1. Offers shall be received by the Los Angeles District COE no later than the time and date specified as directed by the Request for Proposal and in accordance with Section 00 21 16.

1.5. SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE PRICE PROPOSAL (VOLUME I):

1.5.1. Number of Sets of the Price Proposal: Submit One (1) original only

1.5.2. Format and Contents of the Price Proposal/List of Tabs: The Price Proposal shall be appropriately labeled as such and shall be organized as indicated in the following chart.

TAB CONTENTS OF THE PRICE PROPOSAL (VOLUME I)

1.6. CONTENT FOR THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL (VOLUME II):

1.6.1. TAB 1 – OFFEROR CONSTRUCTION EXPERIENCE ON SIMILAR CONTRACTS

(VOLUME II):

Factor 1: Offeror shall submit all information as required for evaluation as contained in Section 00 22 16.

1.6.2. TAB 2 – OFFEROR KEY PERSONNEL (VOLUME II):

Offeror shall submit all information as required for evaluation as contained in Section 00 22 16.

1.6.3 TAB 3 – OFFEROR PAST PERFORMANCE (VOLUME II)

1.6.4. TAB 4 – MANAGEMENT APPROACH (VOLUME II)

1.6.5. TAB 5 –PROPOSED SCHEDULE (VOLUME II)

TAB #1 SF 1442

TAB #2

The Completed Pricing Schedule with the Offeror’s proposed contract line item prices inserted in the appropriate spaces. Prices must be proposed for the Base Bid Items. Do not round off to the nearest dollar. Check your pricing submission very carefully for mathematical and clerical errors prior to submission.

TAB #3 A Bid Guarantee (e.g., Standard Form 24, “Bid Bond”) TAB #4 Representations & Certifications TAB #5 Teaming Agreement or Irrevocable Subcontractor Offer (if applicable)

00 22 00 ‐Page 4

1.6.7 DRAWINGS – NOT REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT

Must be submitted in accordance with Section 00 22 16 and are included in the requirements under Factor 4, Technical Approach. All drawings shall be either full size (22" x 34") or half size (11" x 17") as described in Section 01012.

1.7. SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL (VOLUME II):

1.7.1. Number of Sets of the Technical Proposal: Submit the original and 4 additional sets of the written Technical Proposal, with each set separately packaged. In addition, submit one complete copy of the technical proposal on Compact Disk (CD) using a searchable “.pdf” file format.

1.7.1.1. Format and Contents of the Technical Proposal/List of Tabs: The original and all copies of the technical proposal will be appropriately labeled as such. Each set shall be organized using the tabs specified in the following chart. The main tabs directly correlate to the evaluation factors identified in Section 00 22 16. The Maximum number of pages for the Technical Proposal is thirty-six (36) pages, or 18 pages double sided for Factors 1 through 4. P a g e s s u b m i t t e d p a s t t h i s l i m i t w i l l n o t b e e v a l u a t e d . T h e P a s t P e r f o r m a n c e Q u e s t i o n n a i r e s ( P P Q ) a n d u p t o t e n ( 1 0 ) p a g e s o f R e s u m e s ( s i n g l e s i d e d ) w i l l n o t b e i n c l u d e d i n t h e a b o v e p a g e c o u n t . P e r f o r m a n c e A s s e s s m e n t R e p o r t s ( P A R ) w i l l b e i n c l u d e d i n t h e p a g e c o u n t , h o w e v e r , a t t a c h m e n t s s u c h a s a n y l e t t e r s o f a p p r e c i a t i o n o r s i m i l a r c o r r e s p o n d e n c e w i l l n o t c o u n t a g a i n s t t h e p a g e l i m i t a t i o n .

1.7.1.2. Detailed Submission Requirements for the Technical Proposal: Offeror(s) must submit detailed responses to the evaluation factors under each of the following volumes and tabs:

00 22 00 ‐Page 5

VOLUME TAB CONTENTS OF THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

VOLUME II

TAB #1

OFFEROR CONSTRUCTION EXPERIENCE ON SIMILAR

CONTRACTS

(Factor 1 in Section 00 22 16)

TAB #2

OFFEROR KEY PERSONNEL

(Factor 2 in Section 00 22 16)

TAB #3 OFFEROR PAST PERFORMANCE

(Factor 3 in Section 00 22 16)

VOLUME II TAB #4 MANAGEMENT APPROACH

(Factor 4 in Section 00 22 16)

VOLUME II

TAB #5

PROPOSED SCHEDULE

(Factor 5 in Section 00 22 16)

Instructions regarding responses to the evaluation factors are detailed in Section 00 22 16, entitled, “Proposed Evaluation and Contract Award”

00 22 00 ‐Page 6

PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT

(To be completed by Offeror)

1. Contractor (Firm being evaluated):

Name: Address:

2. Contract Number: Task Order (TO) Number if Applicable:

3. Solicitation Type: Negotiated Sealed Bid

4. Contract/TO Type: Fixed-Price Cost Reimbursement Hybrid (explain)

Routine Difficult (low to high) Complexity of Work 1 2 3 4 5

6. Contract/TO Dollar Value:

7. Contract/TO Status: Active Complete Completion Date (w/ extensions):

8. Description, location & relevancy of work:

9. LEED Certification Building Construction:

10. Warranty or other problems encountered and how resolved:

11. Name, Address, Telephone Number and E-mail of the Procuring Contracting Officer and/or the Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) (and other references, e.g., Administrative Contracting Officer, if applicable): Check one of the following blocks:

11. Check one of the following blocks:

A written performance evaluation was received for this project and is attached.

A written performance evaluation was not received for this project. A performance questionnaire has been sent to the reference(s) listed in Block 10, with a letter requesting that the completed questionnaire be returned directly to the Corps of Engineers by the closing date for this solicitation.

00 22 00 ‐Page 7

1.8. PROPOSAL COVER SHEET:

1.8.1. Format for the Proposal Cover Sheet: The proposal cover sheet is required by FAR 52.215-1(c)(i)-(v). This provision, titled “Instructions to Offerors—Competitive Acquisition,” has been provided in full text in Section 00 22 00.

The format is as follows:

PROPOSAL COVER SHEET

1. Solicitation Number: W912PL-17-R-0025

2. The name, address, and telephone and facsimile numbers of the Offeror and electronic address (if available):

3. A statement specifying the extent of agreement with all terms, conditions, and provisions included in the solicitation and agreement to furnish any or all items upon which prices are offered at the price set opposite each item.

4. Names, titles, and telephone and facsimile numbers (and electronic addresses if available) of persons authorized to negotiate on the Offeror’s behalf with the Government in connection with this solicitation:

5. Name, title, and signature of person authorized to sign the proposal. Proposals signed by an agent shall be accompanied by evidence of that agent’s authority, unless that evidence has been previously furnished to the issuing office.

00 22 00 ‐Page 8

SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

SUBMITTAL

CONTENTS NUMBER REQUIRED

VOLUME I

PRICE PROPOSAL/

PRO-FORMA

REQUIREMENTS

--PROPOSAL COVER SHEET

-- SF 1442 AND AMENDMENTS

--PRICING SCHEDULE

--OFFER GUARANTEE (“BID BOND”)

--REPRESENTATIONS & CERTIFICATIONS

1 ORIGINAL ONLY

CONSTRUCTION

EXPERIENCE ON

SIMILAR

CONTRACTS

PROJECTS OF SIMILAR TYPES, SCOPES

AND COMPLEXITY

-RECENT RELEVANT TEAMING

EXPERIENCES

ORIGINAL + 4 SETS

VOLUME II PAST

PERFORMANCE ON

RECENT RELEVANT

CONTRACTS

-PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE

CHECK

-RELEVANT PROJECT SUMMARY

-RECENT RELEVANT PROJECT

INFORMATION

MANAGEMENT

APPROACH

- PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN

- CONSTRUCTION KEY PERSONNEL’S

RESUME

- ORGANIZATIONAL CHART

PROPOSAL

SCHEDULE

-PROJECT SCHEDULE NARRATIVE

-PROPOSED SCHEDULE

DRAWINGS

N/A

-CIVIL SITE PLAN,

-OVERALL FLOOR PLAN,

-EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS

SAMPLE COVER LETTER

Date

SUBJECT: NAVFAC/USACE Past Performance Questionnaire

Name and Address of Reference

Ladies and Gentlemen:

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Los Angeles District, is conducting a review of our past performance history as part of an upcoming source selection acquisition.

Please complete the attached NAVFAC/USACE Past Performance Questionnaire to aid the Government in its evaluation of our past performance. you may provide the requested information by email to Sandy Oquita Otse.A.Adikhai@usace.army.mil. or call at (213) 452-3248.

The Government is requesting receipt of this information by 2:00 p.m. on 16 April 2015.

You are advised that it is Government policy that the identity of sources providing past performance information will not be released outside the Government.

We appreciate your efforts to help the Government fairly evaluate our record of past performance.

Should you have any questions related to this matter, please contact Ms. Sandy Oquita by telephone

(213) 452-3249.

Sincerely, Contractor

Attachment

NAVFAC/USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ-0) CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)

1. Contractor Information Firm Name: CAGE Code:

Address:DUNs Number: Phone Number:

Email Address:

Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:

2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain) Percent of project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):

3. Contract Information Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please specify):

Contract Title:

Contract Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Explaind ifferences:

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable): Explain Differences:

4. Project Description:

Complexity of Work High Med Routine

How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)

CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)

5. Client Information Name:

Title:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

6. Describe the client’s role in the project:

7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):

8. Client’s Signature:

NOTE: NAVFAC/USACE REQUESTS THAT THE CLIENT COMPLETES THIS

QUESTIONNAIRE AND SUBMITS DIRECTLY BACK TO THE OFFEROR. THE

OFFEROR WILL SUBMIT THE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO USACE

WITH THEIR PROPOSAL, AND MAY DUPLICATE THIS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR

FUTURE SUBMISSION ON USACE SOLICITATIONS. CLIENTS ARE HIGHLY

ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT QUESTIONNAIRES DIRECTLY TO THE OFFEROR.

HOWEVER, QUESTIONNAIRES MAY BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO USACE.

PLEASE CONTACT THE OFFEROR FOR USACE POC INFORMATION. THE

GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO VERIFY ANY AND ALL

INFORMATION ON THIS FORM.

ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST

REFLECT YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S

PERFORMANCE

RATING DEFINITION NOTE

(E) Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.

An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

(VG) Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner.

There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.

(S) Satisfactory Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.

(M) Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.

(U) Unsatisfactory

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.

(N) Not Applicable

No information or did not apply to your contract

Rating will be neither positive nor negative.

TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT

PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.

1. QUALITY:

a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts E VG S M U N

b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance E VG S M U N

c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance

E VG S M U N

d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance)

E VG S M U N

2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below)

b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract

E VG S M U N

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project? E VG S M U N

b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes;

responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication)

c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer? E VG S M U N

d) Overall customer satisfaction E VG S M U N

4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR

a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force? E VG S M U N

b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort

E VG S M U N

c) Government Property Control E VG S M U N

d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel E VG S M U N

e) Utilization of Small Business concerns E VG S M U N

f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines E VG S M U N

g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to E VG S M U N

Government changes

h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program) E VG S M U N

5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)?

E VG S M U N

b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client

c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns)

d) Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section.

Yes No

e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.

Yes No

f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below. Yes No

6. SAFETY/SECURITY

a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues?

(Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.)

b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements.

E VG S M U N

7. GENERAL

a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues).

b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues) E VG S M U N

c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below) Yes No

d) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor. E VG S M U N

Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks. Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk.

(please attach additional pages if necessary):

W912PL-17-R-0025

Section 00 22 16

Section 00 22 16- 1

SECTION 00 22 16

SUPPLEMENTARY INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS

I. ELIGIBILITY FOR CONTRACT AWARD

II. SOURCE SELECTION USING LOWEST PRICE TECHNICALLY ACCEPTABLE

III. LIST OF THE TECHNICAL EVALUATION FACTORS AND THEIR RELATIVE WEIGHTS

IV. TECHNICAL EVALUATION FACTORS AND EVALUATION CRITERIA

V. EVALUATION OF THE PRICE PROPOSAL

VI. INTENT TO AWARD WITHOUT DISCUSSIONS

VII. PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL

Section 00 22 16- 2

SECTION 00 22 16

SUPPLEMENTARY INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS

I. ELIGIBILITY FOR CONTRACT AWARD

In accordance with the Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR), no contract will be entered into unless the Contracting Officer ensures that all requirements of law, executive orders, regulations, and all other applicable procedures, including clearances and approvals, have been met. This includes the FAR requirement that no award shall be made unless the Contracting Officer makes an affirmative determination of responsibility. To be determined responsible, a prospective contractor must meet the general standards in FAR Part 9 and any special standards set forth in the solicitation.

II. SOURCE SELECTION USING LOWEST PRICE TECHNICALLY ACCEPTABLE (LPTA)

The Government will make award to the offeror submitting the lowest priced technically acceptable proposal meeting or exceeding the acceptability standards for non-cost factors. The Government will first review non-cost technical proposals to determine which are acceptable to the Government.

Responses that the offeror understands, or will comply with the specifications, statements paraphrasing the specifications, and general or overly broad responses such as “standard procedures will be employed” or “well known techniques will be used”, will be rated unacceptable.

The objective of the Government is to award a contract to an offeror who submits a proposal that when evaluated is determined to meet the acceptability levels established in the solicitation for each non-cost evaluation factor. Each non-cost evaluation factor will receive a rating of Acceptable or Unacceptable.

The award will be made to the technically acceptable proposal with the lowest evaluated proposed price.

The Construction Cost Limitation is $5,335,000. Proposals that exceed the Construction Cost Limitation may be looked upon unfavorably in the evaluation process.

III. LIST OF THE TECHNICAL EVALUATION FACTORS (VOLUME II) AND SPECIFIC TECHNICAL

EVALUATION CRITERIA

The Technical Proposal will be evaluated based on the following technical evaluation factors

A. In order to be considered technically acceptable, proposals must meet the following minimum acceptable requirements:

FACTOR 1: OFFEROR CONSTRUCTION EXPERIENCE ON SIMILAR CONTRACTS

FACTOR 2: OFFEROR KEY PERSONNEL

FACTOR 3: OFFEROR PAST PERFORMANCE

FACTOR 4: MANAGEMENT APPROACH

FACTOR 5: PROPOSED SCHEDULE

FACTORS 1 THRU 5 RATING SCHEME RATING DESCRIPTION

Acceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the

Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown.

Unacceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Standard for Acceptability: This standard is met when the proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation

Section 00 22 16- 3

IV. TECHNICAL EVALUATION FACTORS AND EVALUATION CRITERIA

The evaluation factors takes into consideration not only how important that particular factor is to the overall project, but also the latitude for the Offeror to provide features that would be more advantageous to the Government. An evaluation of technical quality/technical merit is inherent in these criteria.

Proposals, which exceed the minimum criteria will therefore be rated higher than proposals which only meet the minimum criteria in accordance with the value of these features to the Government.

Risk to the Government will be evaluated. Proposal risk is an assessment of the weaknesses and risks associated with the Offerors proposed approach derived from the technical evaluation. Performance risk is an assessment of the Offeror’s demonstrated performance on recent, relevant contracts relative to the past performance factor.

NOTE: For purposes of evaluating Offeror Experience and Offeror Past Performance, Offeror is defined as the firm identified in Block 14 of the Standard Form 1442. If more than one firm is listed in Block 14, then a signed Joint Venture/partnership agreement must be submitted with the proposal and the Joint Venture/partnership shall be registered as such in the System for Award Management (SAM) database.

However, each party of the Joint Venture/partnership must submit its own DUNS number with the Joint Venture/partnership proposal. Submitted projects performed by other entities than the Offeror, such as teaming joint venturers or partners or subcontractors, will not be evaluated as Offeror experience or Offeror past performance, unless those other entities are part of a Joint Venture/partnership Offeror as demonstrated by a signed Joint Venture/partnership agreement. Also, cited project examples must identify its role in the project if the Offeror was not the prime contractor – i.e., it was acting as a subcontractor at any tier.

FACTOR 1: OFFEROR CONSTRUCTION EXPERIENCE ON SIMILAR CONTRACTS

This factor will evaluate the extent of an offeror’s successful experience and proposed team’s experience (key subcontractors) on projects of similar type, scope, magnitude and complexity as compared to the work that is required under this RFP.

Offeror shall identify at least three (3) projects for the construction firm and at least three (3) projects for the design firm that are similar in scope, magnitude and complexity to the RFP project, and which were successfully completed within the past five (5) years.

Evaluation Factor: The following are the minimum requirements that are key to successful contract performance to demonstrate experience on similar contracts.

If more than three (3) projects are submitted for the Offeror, only the first three (3) submitted for the firm will be evaluated, starting from the most recent and working backwards in time. One project cited should have a minimum construction dollar value of $5 Million; the other two projects should have a minimum construction dollar value of $3.5 Million

All three projects shall have been completed, or at least 70% completed herein referred to as “substantially complete”, within five (5) years from the date that the proposal or solicitation is due.

Each project example shall demonstrate relevant experience to the proposed acquisition, with “relevant experience” being defined as experience on projects that are similar in size, scope and complexity (or definable features of work and complexity).

The offeror must demonstrate qualifications and experience in Lightning Protection Systems (LPS).

Project description should explain how and why Offeror considers this to be similar to the RFP project.

Provide a brief description of each project, describe its scope of the work, total dollar value of the contract at the time of award and at the time of completion. Provide the name, address and telephone number of the owner. In the case of a federal, state or local government project, provide the name, Section 00 22 16- 4 address, and telephone number of the contracting officer.

requirements of the solicitation.

FACTOR 2: OFFEROR KEY PERSONNEL

The Government will evaluate corporate, design and construction management structure, experience and qualifications of the key personnel and major subcontractors proposed for the project to include the capability to staff, manage, resource and control successful projects. Personnel will be evaluated on their overall professional experience and on specific experience on projects of similar type, scope, and complexity to the work required under this RFP.

The Offeror shall provide the names and resumes for key construction and design personnel that will be assigned to this project directly responsible for carrying out the design and construction requirements of this contract. In addition, the Offeror shall provide a summary of the duties and responsibilities of these individuals which clearly indicate separate duties and responsibilities for each individual. Professional qualifications and years of relevant experience will both be assessed. This section shall include data on the following personnel:

A). CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGER: The proposed Construction Project Manager is responsible for all aspects of the project. Minimum requirements for this position are:

- Possess a Bachelor’s Degree in Engineering, Sciences, or Construction Management.

- Five (5) years’ experience (within the last ten (10) years) as an overall project manager on projects similar in size and complexity of the proposed project.

Projects used as experience shall be complete or substantially complete within the last ten (10) years. A minimum of three (3) projects shall be presented. Include the following, if applicable, in your resume’s project information: experience on similar projects; project experience with military and past DoD, or Corps of Engineers experience; if any.

B). PROJECT SUPERINTENDENT: The Project Superintendent position has to be independent of any other positions. No dual roles will be allowed (i.e. not allowed to serve as the Construction CQC or the Safety Manager as well as performing the Project Superintendent position).

The proposed On-Site Project Superintendent(s) shall have the following minimum requirements:

- Five (5) years construction experience (within the last ten (10) years) as a superintendent on industrial construction projects or projects similar in size and complexity to the proposed project.

Project used as experience shall be complete or substantially complete within the last ten (10) years. A minimum of three (3) projects shall be submitted. Include the following, if applicable, in your resume’s project information: experience in similar projects; project experience with military and past Corps of Engineers experience; if any.

C). CONTRACTOR QUALITY CONTROL (CQC) SYSTEMS MANAGER: The Contractor Quality Control (CQC) Systems Manager position has to be independent of any other positions. No dual roles will be allowed (i.e. not allowed to serve as the Project Superintendent or the Safety Manager as well as performing the Construction CQC position).

The proposed Construction CQC shall have the following minimum requirements:

Technical Spec Section 01 45 00.00 10 requires the QC Manager to have a degree, however, on this procurement the degree requirement for Quality Control manager may be waived In lieu of experience. The QC manager must have the degree or minimum 5 years construction/ engineering experience with at least 5 years as a CQC Manager or they may be considered deficient for this factor.

Projects used as experience shall be complete or substantially complete within the last ten (10) years.

Include the following, if applicable, in your resume’s project information: experience on similar projects;

Section 00 22 16- 5 project experience with military and past Corps of Engineers experience; if any. Also reference Quality Control 01 45 00.00 10, paragraph 3.4.2 in the RFP.

For the above three (3) positions, the proposal must clearly show the job title, time in position submitted, and the company history of employment. Resumes should be listed in reverse chronological order, with the latest experience first, and all time gaps on each resume fully explained. In addition, the educational qualifications of the proposed personnel should be submitted.

The Government will evaluate corporate, construction management structure, experience and qualifications of the key personnel…