W912PL-17-R-0017_Amendment0002.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICAITON NO. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicble)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

FACILITY CODE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICIATION NO.

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a)By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment your desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPIRATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc. ) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15C. DATE SIGNED

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION ( Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

PAGE OF PAGES

6. ISSUED BY CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)

CODE

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

Previous edition unusable

1 341

0002 Feb 27, 2017

W912PL

CONTRACTING DIVISION

915 Wilshire Blvd

LOS ANGELES, CA 90053-2325

SEE ITEM 6

W912PL-17-R-0017

Jan 31, 2017

FY 16 F-35 Live Ordnance Loading Area (LOLA), Nellis AFB, Las Vegas Valley, Nevada

1. Please see attached Amendment 0002 summary sheet for all revisions.

Sandra Oquita

CONTRACTING OFFICER

INSTRUCTIONS

Instructions for items other than those that are self-explanatory, are as follows:

Item 1 (Contract ID Code) . Insert the contract type identification code that appears in the title block of the contract being modified.

Item 3 (Effective date) .

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

For a solicitation amendment, change order, or administrative change, the effective date shall be the issue date of the amendment, change order, or administrative change.

For a supplemental agreement, the effective date shall be the date agreed to by the contracting parties.

For a modification issued as an initial or confirming notice of termination for the convenience of the Government, the effective date and the modification number of the confirming notice shall be the same as the effective date and modification number of the initial notice.

For a modification converting a termination for default to a termination for the convenience of the Government, the effective date shall be the same as the effective date of the termination for default.

For a modification confirming the contacting officer's determination of the amount due in settlement of a contract termination, the effective date shall be the same as the effective date of the initial decision.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

Item 6 (Issued By) . Insert the name and address of the issuing office. If applicable, insert the appropriate issuing office code in the code block.

Item 8 (Name and Address of Contractor) . For modifications to a contract or order, enter the contractor's name, address, and code as shown in the original contract or order, unless changed by this or a previous modification.

Item 9, (Amendment of Solicitation No. - Dated), and 10, (Modification of Contract/Order No. - Dated ). Check the appropriate box and in the corresponding blanks insert the number and date of the original solicitation, contract, or order.

Item 12 (Accounting and Appropriation Data) .

When appropriate, indicate the impact of the modification on each affected accounting classification by inserting one of the following entries.

(2) Accounting classification Net decrease $

Include subject matter or short title of solicitation/contract where feasible.

Item 16B . The contracting officer's signature is not required on solicitation amendments. The contracting offier's signature is normally affixed last on supplemental agreements.

(i)

NOTE: If there are changes to multiple accounting classifications that cannot be placed in block 12, insert an asterisk and the words "See continuation sheet".

Item 13 . Check the appropriate box to indicate the type of modification. Insert in the corresponding blank the authority under which the modification is issued. Check whether or not contractor must sign this document. (See FAR 43.103.)

Item 14 (Description of Amendment/Modification) .

Organize amendments or modifications under the appropriate Uniform Contract Format (UCF) section headings from the applicable solicitation or contract. The UCF table of contents, however, shall not be set forth in this document Indicate the impact of the modification on the overall total contract price by inserting one of the following entries:

Total contract price increased by $

Total contract price decreased by $

Total contract price unchanged.

State reason for modification.

When removing, reinstating, or adding funds, identify the contract items and accounting classifications.

When the SF 30 is used to reflect a determination by the contracting officer of the amount due in settlement of a contract terminated for the convenience of the Government, the entry in Item 14 of the modification may be limited to --

A reference to the letter determination; and

A statement of the net amount determined to be due in settlement of the contract.

(g)

(h)

(i)

(ii)

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(i)

(ii)

(iii)

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83) BACK

(1) Accounting classification Net increase $

FY16 Live Ordnance Loading Area (LOLA) W912PL-17-R-0017 Nellis AFB, Las Vegas Valley, NV

AMENDMENT 0002

AMENDMENT 0002 Summary Sheet

1. Please remove and add section 00 22 00, 00 22 16, 00 70 00 and 00 73 00.

2. Please remove and add attached Spec sections 01 10 11 Room Data Sheets.

3. Please remove and add attached Spec sections 01 33 16.00 and 01 54 00.

SECTION 00 22 00 - 1

SECTION 00 22 00 - SUPPLEMENTARY INSTRUCTIONS

I. GENERAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

II. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS:

III. SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE PRICE PROPOSAL (VOLUME I):

IV. SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL (VOLUME II):

V. PROPOSAL COVER SHEET:

VI. PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT

VII. SMALL BUSINESS PARTICIPATION PLAN (FORM)

VIII. SUBCONTRACTING PLAN (FORM)

IX. SAMPLE COVER LETTER

X. NAVFAC/USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ-0)

SECTION 00 22 00 - 2

I. GENERAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

In order to effectively and equitably evaluate all offers, the Contracting Officer must receive sufficiently detailed information that clearly responds to the technical evaluation factors listed in Section 00 22 16.

Proposers shall submit their proposal packages in accordance with the instructions outlined in Section 00 21 16, 52.215-4009 Directions for Submitting Offers.

Each Proposer must submit their responses to the technical evaluation factors in a Technical Proposal (Original Plus 4 copies) and Price Proposal (Original only). The Technical Proposal and Price Proposal must be submitted as separate distinct volumes. Both the Price Proposal (Volume I) and the Technical Proposal (Volume II) must be received by the closing date and time set for receipt of proposals.

No dollar amounts or pricing information from the Price Proposal are to be included in the responses to the technical evaluation factors.

All information intended by the Proposer to be evaluated must be submitted as part of the Technical Proposal.

II. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS:

All written portions: Use only 8 ½ by 11 inch paper, unless another size is specifically authorized elsewhere in this section for a particular submission. Do not use 11” X 14” or 11” X 17” size sheets (e.g. fold-outs) unless specifically authorized for a particular submission. Do not use a font size smaller than 10, an unusual font style such as script, or condensed print.

Three-ring binders are preferred. Do not use spring clamps or exceed the recommended capacity of the fastener or binder. Do not use plastic multi-hole/spiral binding systems, heat binding systems, or other systems which do not facilitate the ready insertion of additional pages.

“Confidential” projects cannot be submitted to demonstrate capability unless all of the information required for evaluation as specified herein can nonetheless be provided to the Government as part of the Proposer’s Technical Proposal. Proposers that include in their proposals information that they do not want disclosed to the public for any purpose, or used by the Government except for evaluation purposes, must be clearly marked in accordance with the instructions at FAR 52.215-1, “Instructions to Proposer—Competitive Acquisition”, paragraph (3), “Restriction on disclosure and use of data”.

The Corps of Engineers recognizes that submittals by the Proposer may contain confidential or proprietary information; however, the Government reserves the right to make inquiries into the information disclosed. The submission of false or misleading information may be grounds for disqualification of the proposal.

Proposer(s) shall submit their proposal packages to the Los Angeles District Corps of Engineers (COE) in accordance with Section 00 21 16 of the solicitation.

SECTION 00 22 00 - 3

III. SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE PRICE PROPOSAL (VOLUME I):

Number of Sets of the Price Proposal: Submit One (1) original only.

Format and Contents of the Price Proposal/List of Tabs:

The Price Proposal shall be appropriately labeled as such and shall be organized as indicated in the following chart.

TAB CONTENTS OF THE PRICE PROPOSAL

TAB #1 SF 1442 Acknowledgement Sheet

TAB #2

CLIN Schedule (See Section 00 10 00) and Completed

Corporate Principal (See Section 00 01 05)

TAB #3 Bid Bond

TAB #4 Representations & Certifications

TAB #5 Joint Venture/Teaming Agreement (If Applicable)

TAB #6 Small Business Subcontracting Plan (If Applicable)

IV. SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL (VOLUME

II):

Number of Sets and Pages of the Technical Proposal: Submit original and four (4) additional sets of the written Technical Proposal, with each set separately packaged. In addition, submit one complete copy of the technical proposal on Compact Disk (CD) using a searchable “.pdf” file format. The Technical Proposals shall be in 8-1/2" x 11" format, bound as a single document, with single-sided or double-sided pages being acceptable. Condensed print is not permitted. The Proposals shall be separated with section tabs, and the tabs shall clearly identify the contents of each section. The Maximum number of pages for the Technical Proposal is fifty (50) pages single sided or twenty-five (25) pages double sided. The following items will not count against the page count: Table of Contents, Section Tabs, letters of appreciation and similar correspondence, up to 1 page per resume for each proposed team member (required from Factor 4) (single sided) of Resumes, CCASS/ACASS and the Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQs). Material contents of Technical Proposals that exceed fifty (50) pages will not be evaluated after page fifty (50). Each page shall be sequentially numbered for that section.

Format and Contents of the Technical Proposal/List of Tabs: The original and all copies of the technical proposal will be appropriately labeled as such. Each set shall be organized using the tabs specified in the chart below. The tabs directly correlate to the evaluation factors identified in Section 00 22 16.

SECTION 00 22 00 - 4

TAB CONTENTS OF VLOUME II TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

TAB #1 FACTOR 1: EXPERIENCE ON SIMILAR CONTRACTS

TAB #2

FACTOR 2: TECHNICAL APPROACH, METHODS AND

PROCEDURES

TAB #3

FACTOR 3: PAST PERFORMANCE ON RECENT AND

RELEVANT CONTRACTS

TAB #4 FACTOR 4: CORPORATE MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE

TAB #5 FACTOR 5: SCHEDULE

TAB #6 FACTOR 6: SMALL BUSINESS PARTICIPATION PLAN

Detailed Submission Requirements for the Technical Proposal: Submit detailed responses to the evaluation factors under each of the tabs. Specifics for the required information to be submitted are described in detail in Section 00 22 16.

FACTOR #1 EXPERIENCE ON SIMILAR CONTRACTS

FACTOR #2 TECHNICAL APPROACH, METHODS AND PROCEDURES

FACTOR #3 PAST PERFORMANCE ON RECENT AND RELEVANT CONTRACTS

FACTOR #4 CORPORATE MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE

FACTOR #5 SCHEDULE

FACTOR #6 SMALL BUSINESS PARTICIPATION PLAN

SECTION 00 22 00 - 5

V. PROPOSAL COVER SHEET:

Format for the Proposal Cover Sheet:

The proposal cover sheet is required by FAR 52.215-1(c) (i)-(v). This provision, titled “Instructions to Offerors—Competitive Acquisition,” has been provided in full text in Section 00 21 16. The format is as follows:

PROPOSAL COVER SHEET

1. Solicitation Number: W912PL-17-R-0017

2. The name, address, and telephone and facsimile numbers of the Proposer and electronic address (if available):

3. A statement specifying the extent of agreement with all terms, conditions, and provisions included in the solicitation and agreement to furnish any or all items upon which prices are offered at the price set opposite each item.

4. Names, titles, and telephone and facsimile numbers (and electronic addresses if available) of persons authorized to negotiate on the Proposer’s behalf with the Government in connection with this solicitation:

5. Name, title, and signature of person authorized to sign the proposal. Proposals signed by an agent shall be accompanied by evidence of that agent’s authority, unless that evidence has been previously furnished to the issuing office.

SECTION 00 22 00 - 6

VI. PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT

(To be completed by Proposer)

1. Contractor (Firm being evaluated):

Name: Address:

2. Contract Number: Task Order (TO) Number if Applicable:

3. Solicitation Type: Negotiated or Sealed Bid

4. Contract/TO Type: Fixed-Price Cost, Reimbursement, Hybrid (explain)

5. Routine Difficult (low to high) Complexity of Work 1 2 3 4 5

6. Contract/TO Dollar Value:

7. Contract/TO Status: Active Complete Completion Date (w/ extensions):

8. Description, location & relevancy of work:

9. Problems encountered and how resolved:

10. Name, Address, Telephone Number and E-mail of the Procuring Contracting Officer and/or the Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) (and other references, e.g., Administrative Contracting Officer, if applicable):

SECTION 00 22 00 - 7

11. Check one of the following blocks:

A written performance evaluation was received for this project and is attached.

A written performance evaluation was not received for this project. A Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) has been sent to the reference(s) listed in

Block 10, with a letter requesting that the completed questionnaire be returned directly to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers by the closing date for this solicitation.

SECTION 00 22 00 - 8

VII. SMALL BUSINESS PARTICIPATION PLAN (FORM)

(1) Check the applicable size and categories for the PRIME Offeror -- Check all applicable boxes:

{ } Large Prime or

{ } Small Business Prime; also categorized as a { } Small Disadvantaged Businesses { } Woman-Owned Small Business { } HUB Zone Small Business { } Veteran Owned Small Business { } Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business { } HBCU/MIs

(2) Submit the total combined percentage (must equal 100%) of work to be performed by both large and small businesses (include the percentage of work to be performed both by Prime and Sub-contractors):

Example: If Prime proposes a price of $1,000,000 (including all options), and small business(es) will provide $250,000 in services/supplies as a prime or subcontractor, the % planned for small businesses is 25%; and 75% for large business equaling 100%.

Percentage of Total Contract Dollars/Price

Total Percentage planned for Large Business(es) _______% Total Percentage planned for Small Business(es) _______%

(3) Please indicate the total percentage of participation to be performed by each type of small business.

The percentage of work performed by Small Businesses that qualify in multiple small business categories may be counted in each category:

Example: Victory Prop Mgt (WOSB and SDVOSB) performing 2%; and Gentleman Concierge (HubZone) and WOSB) performing 3%. Results equate to: HubZone 3%; WOSB 5%; SDVOSB

2%; VOSB 2%);.

SDVOSBs are also VOSBs automatically; however VOSBs are not automatically SDVOSBs.

Small Disadvantaged Businesses _________% HUB Zone Small Business _________% Woman Owned Small Business _________% Service Disabled Veteran Owned SB _________% Veteran Owned Small Business _________% HBCU/MIs _________%

(4) List principle supplies/services to be performed by Small Businesses:

Example: If a Small Business qualifies also as a WOSB and a SDVOSB, and you can add them

SECTION 00 22 00 - 9

to each category below in which they qualify.

Name of Company Identify Type of Service/Supply

Small:

Small Disadvantaged Businesses:

Women-Owned Small:

HUB Zone Small:

Veteran Owned Small:

Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small:

HBCU/MI:

(5) Describe the extent of commitment to use small businesses (for example, what types of commitments if any are in place for this specific acquisition either -- written, verbal, enforceable, non-enforceable, joint venturing, mentor-protégé, etc.)

SECTION 00 22 00 - 10

(6) Large Business Subcontracting Past Performance: Describe the extent to which you attained applicable goals for contracts that required you to submit a Subcontracting Plan. You may include copies of up to three ISRs (Individual Subcontracting Reports) to validate your past performance. You may also submit an explanation of your efforts, where you failed to meet goals.

Additional Important Note for Large Businesses only.

Small Business Sub-Contracting Plans (FAR 52.219-9)

Separate from the Small Business Participation Plan, large business offerors must also submit a Subcontracting Plan (Individual Contract Plan) as required by FAR 52.219-9. Large businesses will not be eligible for award if they fail to submit an acceptable Subcontracting Plan.

Subcontracting Plans shall reflect and be consistent with the commitments offered in the Small Business Participation Plan. In accordance with DFARS 215.304(c), when an evaluation assesses the extent that small businesses are specifically identified in proposals, the small businesses considered in the evaluation shall be listed in any subcontracting plan submitted.

SECTION 00 22 00 - 11

VIII. SUBCONTRACTING PLAN (FORM)

(SAMPLE ONLY; PLEASE READ VERY CAREFULLY. YOU MAY FILL IN THE BLANKS AND SUBMIT AS IS)

(TO BE SUBMITTED BY LARGE BUSINESSES)

(CONTRACTOR’S NAME)

(ADDRESS)

Solicitation or Contract Number

(Title of the Project)

(Location)

(Date Prepared)

CONCUR/NON-CONCUR:

Small Business Specialist Date

ACCEPTED/NON-ACCEPTANCE:

Procuring Contracting Officer Date

Total Dollar Value of the Contract: $ __

SECTION 00 22 00 - 12

SUBCONTRACTING PLAN

The following, together with any Attachments, is submitted as a Subcontracting Plan to satisfy the application requirements of Public Law (PL) 95-507 as implemented by OFPP Policy letter 80-2 and Supplement No. 2 to 80-2 and PL 100-180 Section

806. The following percentage goals established for the Base Period and/or all Bid Items are applicable to the contract cited above.

1. The total dollar value of the proposal $ _______________ (base period if solicitation involves option years)

2. The total estimated dollar value of all planned $ ______________

Subcontracting to all businesses, regardless of size

3. Estimated Dollar ($) value of subcontracting by size of business, and Percentage (%) goals assigned to each.

a. Large Businesses (LB) $ ______ _________ %

b. Small Businesses (SB) $ ______________ _ ___________%

(1) Small Disadvantaged Businesses (SDB) $ ______ _________%

(2) Women-Owned Small Businesses (WOSB) $ ______ ____________%

(3) Historically Underutilized Business Zone $ ________ ___________% Small Businesses (HUBZone SB)

(4) Veteran-Owned Small Businesses (VOSB) $ _______ __________%

(5) Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Businesses (SDVOSB) $ _________________ ____________%

(6) Historically Black Colleges and Universities/ Minority Institutions (HBCU/MI) $ _________________ ____________%

(7) *Javits-Wagner-O'Day (National Industry for the Severely Handicapped) (JWOD-NISH) $ _________________ ____________%

SECTION 00 22 00 - 13

*Per DFARS 219.703, subcontracts awarded to qualified non-profit agencies for the blind or severely disabled may be counted toward small business subcontracting goal.

NOTES:

1. The sum of lines 3.a and 3.b must equal line 2.

2. Lines 3.b.(1) through 3.b(7) identify various categories of small businesses under the main small business (SB) group. Subcontracts to companies that qualify in multiple categories must be reported under each category.

For example: if you are planning to subcontract $100,000 to ABC, a woman-owned small disadvantaged business that is also a certified HUBZone small business, you will report $100,000 on line 3.b. (SB), line 3.b. (1) SDB), line 3.b. (2) WOSB and line 3.b.(3) HUBZone SB.

4. The following principle types of products, supplies and/or services are anticipated to be subcontracted under this contract to Large Businesses, Small Businesses, Small Disadvantaged Businesses, Women-Owned Small Businesses, HUBZone Small Businesses, Veteran-Owned Small Businesses, and Service Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Businesses:

For example: Provide listing of subcontractors, their business size, and amount to be subcontracted.

Contractor Size Type of Work $ or % ABC Landscaping SB/SDB Landscape $15,000 XYZ Plumbing Hubz/SDB/SDVOSB Plumbing $20,000 FOX Testing WOSB soil testing $18,500 AX Equipment Service LB equipment rental $30,000 Smith’s Environmental SB Consultant $ 9,500 BECK’S Janitorial Svc. SB/VOSB Janitorial $22,000

5. The following method was used to develop above subcontracting goals. Include a statement explaining how the products and services to be subcontracted were determined; how much subcontracting to the various types of businesses were determined and how their capabilities were determined. (Use Attachment 2 if additional space is required)

6. What source lists was utilized in making the determinations in 5 above.

7. Indirect and overhead costs have have not been included in the goals specified in paragraphs

3. and 4. Above. If it is included, please explain the methodology used and the amount of the indirect and overhead costs.

8. The following named employee will administer the Subcontracting Plan.

Name:

Title:

Address:

E-mail Address:

Telephone Number:

Fax Number:

SECTION 00 22 00 - 14

This individual’s specific duties, as they relate to the firm’s Subcontracting Plan, are as follows:

General overall responsibility for this company’s Small Business Program, the development, preparation, and execution of this Subcontracting Plan and for monitoring performance relative to contractual subcontracting requirements contained in the Plan, including, but not limited to:

Developing and maintaining bidder lists of SB, SDB, WOSB, HUBZone, VOSB, SDVOSB, JWOD, and

HBCU/MI concerns (small business community) for all possible sources.

Ensuring that procurement packages are structured to the small business community to participate to the maximum extent possible.

Assuring inclusion of the small business community in all solicitations for products and services that they are capable of providing.

Reviewing solicitations to remove statements, clauses, etc. which may tend to restrict or prohibit small business community participation.

Ensuring periodic rotation of potential subcontractor on bidder lists.

Ensuring that the bid proposal review board documents its reasons for not selecting low bids submitted by the small business community.

Ensuring the establishment and maintenance of records of solicitations and subcontract award activity.

Attending, or arranging for attendance of company counselors, at Business Opportunity Workshops, Minority

Business Enterprise Seminars, Trade fairs, etc.

Conducting, or arranging for the conduct of, motivational training for purchasing personnel pursuant to the intent of P.L.

95-507.

Monitoring attainment of proposed goals.

Preparing and submitting required periodic subcontracting reports.

Coordinating contractor’s activities during the conduct of compliance reviews by Federal agencies.

Coordinating the conduct of contractor’s activities involving its small business- subcontracting program.

Additions to the duties specified above are as follows:

9. The following efforts will be taken to assure that the small business community will have an equitable opportunity to compete for subcontracts.

(For example: Outreach sources will be identified from the SBA database, business Development organizations; participate in small business trade fairs, matchmaking, etc.)

a. Outreach efforts will be made as follows:

b. Automated data base sources to be used, other than Dynamic Small Business Search at http://SAM.GOV , are as follows:

http://sam.gov/

SECTION 00 22 00 - 15

c. The following internal efforts will be made to guide and encourage buyers:

(1) Workshops, seminars, and training programs will be conducted.

(2) Activities will be monitored to evaluate compliance with this Subcontracting Plan. (3) Arrange interviews with the small business community.

(4) Describe how source lists, past performance history, and other data will be maintained and utilized by buyers in soliciting subcontract; e.g. rotation of firms in the data base, keeping database current, etc.

10. The contractor agrees that the clause 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Businesses, be included in all subcontracts which offer further subcontracting opportunities. All subcontractors, (except small business concerns) who receive subcontracts in excess of $650,000 ($1,500,000 for construction) will be required to adopt and comply with a Subcontracting Plan similar to this one.

Such plans will be reviewed by comparing them with the provisions of PL 95-507 and assuring that all minimum requirements of an acceptable Subcontracting Plan have been satisfied. The acceptability of percentage goals shall be determined by a case-by-case basis depending on the supplies/services involved, the availability of potential firms in the small business community, and prior experience. Once approved and implemented, Plans will be monitored through the submission of periodic reports and/or as time and availability of funds permit, periodic visits for on-site reviews of the progress of the subcontracting program.

11. The contractor agrees to submit such periodic reports and cooperate in any studies or surveys as may be required by the Contracting Agency or the Small Business Administration in order to determine the extent of compliance by the contractor with the Subcontracting Plan and with clause 52.219-8.

12. Periodic reports required by P.L. 95-507 are SF 294, Subcontracting Report for Individual Contract and SF 295, Summary Subcontract Report. Reports will be prepared in accordance with the instructions contained on the Electronic Subcontracting Reporting System/e-SRS) or www.esrs.gov web site. Regardless of the effective date of this contract, reports shall be submitted for the entire life of the contract on the following dates:

Period ending 31 March - Report submitted to arrive not later than 30 April Period ending 30 September - Report submitted to arrive no later than 31 October

NOTE: If the Prime contractor intends to subcontracts to lower tiered large business in excess of $650,000 for service or ($1.5 M for construction) are, also required to have a Subcontracting Plans completed and submitted to the Prime contractor. In addition the lower tiered larger business is also required to prepare and submit the SF294 and SF295 reports bi-annually via the Electronic Subcontracting Reporting System/e-SRS) or www.esrs.gov web site.

13. The contractor agrees that it will maintain at least the following types of records to document compliance with this Subcontracting Plan.

Source lists, guides, and other data, identifying firms in the small business community.

Organizations contracted to locate firms in the small business community.

On a contract-by-contract basis, records on all subcontract solicitations over $100,000 indicating for each solicitation:

(1) whether concerns in the small business community were solicited and if not, why not; and

(2) reasons for the failure of the solicited concerns in the small business community to receive the subcontract award.

Records to support outreach efforts; e.g. contacts with small business trade associations, business development enterprises, attendance at small business procurement conferences and trade fairs; frequency of accessing SBA's Pro-Net data base.

14. Provide a statement on how you will foster Historical Black Colleges/Universities and Minority Institutions and that you will give them equitable opportunity to compete on any of the subcontracting disciplines that may be applicable to Colleges, Universities, or Minority Institutions.

I, the undersigned, a designated officer of: _, do herewith assure that the requirement of this Subcontracting Plan will be satisfied.

http://www.esrs.gov/ http://www.esrs.gov/

SECTION 00 22 00 - 16

(Company Name)

(Signature) (Type or Print Name)

(Title) (Date)

SECTION 00 22 00 - 17

IX. SAMPLE COVER LETTER

Date

SUBJECT: NAVFAC/USACE Past Performance Questionnaire

Name and Address of Reference

Ladies and Gentlemen:

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Los Angeles District, is conducting a review of our past performance history as part of an upcoming source selection acquisition.

Please complete the attached NAVFAC/USACE Past Performance Questionnaire to aid the Government in its evaluation of our past performance and FAX it directly to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, ATTN: Ryan Rivas at (213) 452-3176. If you prefer, you may provide the requested information by email to ryan.e.rivas@usace.army.mil.

The Government is requesting receipt of this information five calendar days before proposal due date.

You are advised that it is Government policy that the identity of sources providing past performance information will not be released outside the Government.

We appreciate your efforts to help the Government fairly evaluate our record of past performance. Should you have any questions related to this matter, please contact Mr. Ryan Rivas at telephone (213) 452-3310.

Sincerely, Contractor

Attachment mailto:Christina.chavez@usace.army.mil

SECTION 00 22 00 - 18

X. NAVFAC/USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form

PPQ-0)

CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)

1. Contractor Information Firm Name: CAGE Code:

Address: DUNs Number:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

Point of Contact:

Contact Phone Number:

2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain) Percent of project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):

3. Contract Information Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please specify):

Contract Title:

Contract Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Explain Differences:

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):

Explain Differences:

4. Project Description:

Complexity of Work High Med Routine How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)

SECTION 00 22 00 - 19

CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)

5. Client Information Name:

Title:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

6. Describe the client’s role in the project:

7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):

8. Client’s Signature:

NOTE: NAVFAC/USACE REQUESTS THAT THE CLIENT COMPLETES THIS

QUESTIONNAIRE AND SUBMITS DIRECTLY BACK TO THE PROPOSER. THE

PROPOSER WILL SUBMIT THE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO USACE WITH

THEIR PROPOSAL, AND MAY DUPLICATE THIS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FUTURE

SUBMISSION ON USACE SOLICITATIONS. CLIENTS ARE HIGHLY

ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT QUESTIONNAIRES DIRECTLY TO THE PROPOSER.

HOWEVER, QUESTIONNAIRES MAY BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO USACE.

PLEASE CONTACT THE PROPOSER FOR USACE POC INFORMATION. THE

GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO VERIFY ANY AND ALL

INFORMATION ON THIS FORM.

ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE

RATING DEFINITION NOTE

(E) Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.

An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating.

Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

SECTION 00 22 00 - 20

(VG) Very Good

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.

(S) Satisfactory Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.

(M) Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.

(U) Unsatisfactory

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.

(N) Not Applicable

No information or did not apply to your contract

Rating will be neither positive nor negative.

SECTION 00 22 00 - 21

TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT

PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.

1. QUALITY:

a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts E VG S M U N

b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance

E VG S M U

N

c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance

E VG S M U

N

d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance)

E VG S M U

N

2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF

PERFORMANCE:

a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below)

E VG S M U

N

b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract

E VG S M U

N

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project?

E VG S M U

N

b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes; responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication)

E VG S M U

N

c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer?

E VG S M U

N

d) Overall customer satisfaction E VG S M U N

4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR

a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force?

E VG S M U

N

b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce

E VG S M U

N

SECTION 00 22 00 - 22

to this effort

c) Government Property Control E VG S M U N

d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel

E VG S M U

N

e) Utilization of Small Business concerns E VG S M U N

f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines

E VG S M U

N

g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes

E VG S M U

N

h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)

E VG S M U

N

SECTION 00 22 00 - 23

5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)?

E VG S M U

N

b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client

E VG S M U

N

c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns)

E VG S M U

N

d) Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section.

Yes No

e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?

Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.

Yes No

f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below. Yes No

6. SAFETY/SECURITY

a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues? (Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.)

E VG S M U

N

b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements.

E VG S M U

N

7. GENERAL

a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues).

E VG S M U

N

b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues)

E VG S M U

N

c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below) Yes No

SECTION 00 22 00 - 24

d) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor.

E VG S M U

N

Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks.

Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary).

FY 16 Live Ordnance Loading Area (LOLA) W912PL-17-R-0017

SECTION 00 22 16-1

Source Selection Information

SECTION 00 22 16 - SUPPLEMENTRAY INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS

I. ELIGIBILITY FOR CONTRACT AWARD

II. SOURCE SELECTION USING THE TRADE-OFF PROCESS

III. LIST OF THE TECHNICAL EVALUATION FACTORS

IV. THE RELATIVE WEIGHTS OF THE TECHNICAL EVALUATION

FACTORS

V. TECHNICAL RATING

VI. DEFINITIONS

VII. DEBRIEFING OFFERORS

VIII. TECHNICAL EVALUATION FACTORS AND EVALUATION CRITERIA 6

IX. PERFORMANCE CONFIDENCE ASSESSMENT

X. EVALUATION OF THE PRICE PROPOSAL

XI. INTENT TO AWARD WITHOUT DISCUSSIONS

XII. PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL

SECTION 00 22 16- 2

AMENDMENT 0001

I. ELIGIBILITY FOR CONTRACT AWARD

In accordance with the Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR), no contract will be entered into unless the Contracting Officer ensures that all requirements of law, executive orders, regulations, and all other applicable procedures, including clearances and approvals, have been met. This includes the FAR requirement that no award shall be made unless the Contracting Officer makes an affirmative determination of responsibility. To be determined responsible, a prospective contractor must meet the general standards in FAR Part 9 and any special standards set forth in the solicitation.

II. SOURCE SELECTION USING THE TRADE-OFF PROCESS

The Government will select the offer that represents the best value to the Government by using the trade-off process described in FAR Part 15. This process permits tradeoffs between price and technical merit/quality and allows the Government to accept other than the lowest priced offer.

The award decision will be based on a comparative assessment of proposals against all source selection criteria in the solicitation.

All non-cost (i.e., technical) evaluation factors, when combined, are approximately equal to price. The Government is concerned with striking the most advantageous balance between Technical merit (quality) and cost to the Government (the price). The degree of importance of price could become greater depending upon the equality of the proposals for the non-price technical evaluation factors. Where competing technical proposals are determined to be substantially equal, price could become the controlling factor.

III. LIST OF THE TECHNICAL EVALUATION FACTORS

The Technical Proposal will be evaluated based on the following technical evaluation factors

The solicitation will be issued as a design-build RFP and the following factors will be included:

• Factor 1: Experience on Similar Contracts

• Factor 2: Technical Approach, Methods, and Procedures

• Factor 3: Past Performance on Recent, Relevant Contracts

• Factor 4: Corporate Management Structure

• Factor 5: Schedule

SECTION 00 22 16- 3

• Factor 6: Small Business Participation Plan

IV. THE RELATIVE WEIGHTS OF THE TECHNICAL EVALUATION FACTORS

All non-cost (i.e., technical) evaluation factors, when combined, are approximately equal to price. The Government is concerned with striking the most advantageous balance between Technical merit (quality) and cost to the Government (the price). The degree of importance of price could become greater depending upon the equality of the proposals for the non-price technical evaluation factors. Where competing technical proposals are determined to be substantially equal, price could become the controlling factor.

The non-price evaluation factors are listed in descending order of importance.

The following factor is the most important and when combined with Factor 2 is worth significantly more than the combined weight of remaining factors.

Factor 1 EXPERIENCE ON SIMILAR CONTRACTS

The following factor (Factor 2) is approximately equal in importance to Factor 1.

Factor 2 TECHNICAL APPROACH, METHODS AND PROCEDURES

The following factor (Factor 3) is less important than the previous factors (Factors 1 and 2).

Factor 3 PAST PERFORMANCE ON RECENT RELEVANT CONTRACTS

The following factor (Factor 4) is less important than the previous factor (Factor 3).

Factor 4 CORPORATE MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE

The following factor (Factor 5) is equal in importance to the previous factor (Factor 4).

Factor 5 SCHEDULE

SECTION 00 22 16- 4

The following factor (Factor 6) is less important than Factor 4 and 5.

Factor 6 SMALL BUSINESS UTILIZATION

V. TECHNICAL RATING

The Source Selection Team (SST) will use a combined technical/risk rating system that includes consideration of risk in conjunction with the strengths, weaknesses, and deficiencies in determining technical ratings. Assessment of technical risk, which is manifested by the identification of weakness(es), considers potential for disruption of schedule, increased costs, degradation of performance, the need for increased Government oversight, and/or the likelihood of unsuccessful contract performance. Combined technical/risk evaluations shall utilize the combined technical/risk ratings listed in Table 1 and the risk descriptions set forth in Table 2.

Table 1. Combined Technical/Risk Ratings Color Rating Description

Blue

Outstanding

Proposal indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements and contains multiple strengths, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

Purple

Good

Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and contains at least one strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low to moderate.

Green

Acceptable

Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

Yellow

Marginal

Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is high.

SECTION 00 22 16- 5

Red

Unacceptable

Proposal does not meet requirements of the solicitation, and thus, contains one or more deficiencies, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is unacceptable. Proposal is unawardable.

Table 2. Technical Risk Rating Method

Rating Description

Low Proposal may contain weakness(es) which have little potential to cause disruption of schedule, increased cost or degradation of performance. Normal contractor effort and normal Government monitoring will likely be able to overcome any difficulties.

Moderate

Proposal contains a significant weakness or combination of weaknesses which may potentially cause disruption of schedule, increased cost or degradation of performance. Special contractor emphasis and close Government monitoring will likely be able to overcome difficulties.

High

Proposal contains a significant weakness or combination of weaknesses which is likely to cause significant disruption of schedule, increased cost or degradation of performance. Is unlikely to overcome any difficulties, even with special contractor emphasis and close Government monitoring.

Unacceptable

Proposal contains a material failure or a combination of significant weaknesses that increases the risk of unsuccessful performance to an unacceptable level.

VI. DEFINITIONS

Rating: The rating for the Technical factor will be expressed as an adjectival assessment of Outstanding, Good, Acceptable, Marginal, or Unacceptable.

Deficiency: A material failure of a proposal to meet a Government requirement or a combination of significant weaknesses in a proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level.

Strength: Any aspect of an offeror’s proposal that has merit or exceeds specified performance or capability requirements in a way that will be advantageous to the Government during contract performance.

SECTION 00 22 16- 6

Weakness: A flaw in the proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance.

VII. DEBRIEFING OFFERORS

Offerors may request a debriefing in accordance with FAR 15.505 Pre-award Debriefing of offerors, and FAR 15.506 Post-award Debriefing of offerors.

VIII. TECHNICAL EVALUATION FACTORS AND EVALUATION CRITERIA

The weighting of the evaluation factors takes into consideration not only how important that particular factor is to the overall project, but also the latitude for the Offeror to provide features that would be more advantageous to the Government. An evaluation of technical quality/technical merit is inherent in these criteria. Proposals, which exceed the minimum criteria or include desirable betterments will therefore be rated higher than proposals which only meet the minimum criteria in accordance with the value of these features to the Government.

Risk to the Government will be evaluated. Proposal risk is an assessment of the weaknesses and risks associated with the Offerors proposed approach derived from the technical evaluation.

Performance risk is an assessment of the…