W912PL-17-R-0017_Amendment0001.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICAITON NO. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicble)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

FACILITY CODE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICIATION NO.

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a)By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment your desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPIRATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc. ) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15C. DATE SIGNED

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION ( Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

PAGE OF PAGES

6. ISSUED BY CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)

CODE

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

Previous edition unusable

1 42

0001 Feb 16, 2017

W912PL

CONTRACTING DIVISION

915 Wilshire Blvd

LOS ANGELES, CA 90053-2325

SEE ITEM 6

W912PL-17-R-0017

Jan 31, 2017

FY 16 F-35 Live Ordnance Loading Area (LOLA), Nellis AFB, Las Vegas Valley, Nevada

1. Please see attached Amendment 0001 summary sheet for all revisions.

Sandra Oquita

CONTRACTING OFFICER

INSTRUCTIONS

Instructions for items other than those that are self-explanatory, are as follows:

Item 1 (Contract ID Code) . Insert the contract type identification code that appears in the title block of the contract being modified.

Item 3 (Effective date) .

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

For a solicitation amendment, change order, or administrative change, the effective date shall be the issue date of the amendment, change order, or administrative change.

For a supplemental agreement, the effective date shall be the date agreed to by the contracting parties.

For a modification issued as an initial or confirming notice of termination for the convenience of the Government, the effective date and the modification number of the confirming notice shall be the same as the effective date and modification number of the initial notice.

For a modification converting a termination for default to a termination for the convenience of the Government, the effective date shall be the same as the effective date of the termination for default.

For a modification confirming the contacting officer's determination of the amount due in settlement of a contract termination, the effective date shall be the same as the effective date of the initial decision.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

Item 6 (Issued By) . Insert the name and address of the issuing office. If applicable, insert the appropriate issuing office code in the code block.

Item 8 (Name and Address of Contractor) . For modifications to a contract or order, enter the contractor's name, address, and code as shown in the original contract or order, unless changed by this or a previous modification.

Item 9, (Amendment of Solicitation No. - Dated), and 10, (Modification of Contract/Order No. - Dated ). Check the appropriate box and in the corresponding blanks insert the number and date of the original solicitation, contract, or order.

Item 12 (Accounting and Appropriation Data) .

When appropriate, indicate the impact of the modification on each affected accounting classification by inserting one of the following entries.

(2) Accounting classification Net decrease $

Include subject matter or short title of solicitation/contract where feasible.

Item 16B . The contracting officer's signature is not required on solicitation amendments. The contracting offier's signature is normally affixed last on supplemental agreements.

(i)

NOTE: If there are changes to multiple accounting classifications that cannot be placed in block 12, insert an asterisk and the words "See continuation sheet".

Item 13 . Check the appropriate box to indicate the type of modification. Insert in the corresponding blank the authority under which the modification is issued. Check whether or not contractor must sign this document. (See FAR 43.103.)

Item 14 (Description of Amendment/Modification) .

Organize amendments or modifications under the appropriate Uniform Contract Format (UCF) section headings from the applicable solicitation or contract. The UCF table of contents, however, shall not be set forth in this document Indicate the impact of the modification on the overall total contract price by inserting one of the following entries:

Total contract price increased by $

Total contract price decreased by $

Total contract price unchanged.

State reason for modification.

When removing, reinstating, or adding funds, identify the contract items and accounting classifications.

When the SF 30 is used to reflect a determination by the contracting officer of the amount due in settlement of a contract terminated for the convenience of the Government, the entry in Item 14 of the modification may be limited to --

A reference to the letter determination; and

A statement of the net amount determined to be due in settlement of the contract.

(g)

(h)

(i)

(ii)

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(i)

(ii)

(iii)

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83) BACK

(1) Accounting classification Net increase $

FY16 Live Ordnance Loading Area (LOLA) W912PL-17-R-0017 Nellis AFB, Las Vegas Valley, NV

AMENDMENT 0001

AMENDMENT 0001 Summary Sheet

1. Please remove and add revised SF1442.

2. Revisions to Volume I formatting and submission requirements. Please remove and add Section 00 22 00.

3. Revisions to evaluation criteria have been made. Please remove and add Section 00 22 16.

4. Revisions to attached drawings A-201, A-101 and A-601. Please remove and add attached drawings A-201, A-101 and A-601 Scope of the revisions is:

a. Eliminated all exterior windows. Continue CMU block pattern to fill in where windows were required.

b. Eliminate all exterior store front doors and replace with hollow metal exterior doors.

c. Extend CMU if required for exterior HM doors to fit.

SOLICITATION, OFFER,

AND AWARD

(Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

1. SOLICITATION NUMBER 2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

SEALED BID (IFB)

NEGOTIATED (RFP)

3. DATE ISSUED PAGE OF PAGES

IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by the offeror.

4. CONTRACT NUMBER 5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NUMBER 6. PROJECT NUMBER

7. ISSUED BY CODE 8. ADDRESS OFFER TO

9. FOR INFORMATION CALL

A. NAME B. TELEPHONE NUMBER (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS)

SOLICITATION

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".

10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS (Title, identifying number, date):

11. The Contractor shall begin performance within calendar days and complete it within calendar days after receiving award, notice to proceed. This performance period is mandatory, negotiable. (See .)

12A. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE PAYMENT BONDS?

(If "YES," indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12B.)

12B. CALENDAR DAYS

YES NO

13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:

A. Sealed offers in original and copies to perform the work required are due at the place specified in Item 8 by (hour) local time (date). If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers will be publicly opened at that time. Sealed envelopes containing offers shall be marked to show the offeror’s name and address, the solicitation number, and the date and time offers are due.

B. An offer guarantee is, is not required.

C. All offers are subject to the (1) work requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.

D. Offers providing less than calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due will not be considered and will be rejected.

NSN 7540-01-155-3212

Designed using Perform Pro, WHS/DIOR, Oct 96

1442-103 STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 4-85) (EG)

Prescribed by GSA - FAR (48 CFR) 53.236-1(d)

W912PL-17-R-0017

X

Jan 31 2017 1 OF 2

USACE, Los Angeles District Contracting Division, East Region Branch 915 Wilshire Blvd Los Angeles, CA 90017

See Item 7

Ryan Rivas (213) 452-3310

FY 16 F-35 Live Ordnance Loading Area (LOLA), Nellis AFB, Las Vegas Valley, Nevada

This project is for the Design and construct a Live Ordnance Load Area (LOLA) in accordance with this RFP, DoD, Air Force, and base design standards. Construction includes 47,720 SM of 16-18 inch (medium load design) 700 PSI flex-strength Portland Cement Concrete aircraft parking ramp; 11,830 SM asphalt shoulders, base and sub-base, drainage systems, apron lighting, edge lighting, pavement markings, site work, earth berm, revetments, utilities, preformed compression joint seals, aircraft tie-downs and grounding points, AGE yard, road relocation, new access roads, vehicle parking lot, sunshades, security fence, associated demolition and all other work as necessary. Design and construct a 14,300 gross square feet LOLA Crew Operations Facility.

Building will have a reinforced concrete foundation and floor slab, structural steel frame, masonry walls, standing metal seam roof, fire detection/protection. Site improvements shall include, utilities including sanitary sewer, water mains and fire hydrants, parking for 200 vehicles, other pavements and communications support. Facilities will be designed as permanent construction in accordance with the DoD Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC) 1-200-01. This project will comply with DoD antiterrorism/force protection requirements per UFC 4-101-01.

The solicitation will be prepared in accordance with FAR 15, and include evaluation factors, developed in accordance with FAR 15.304.

THIS IS A UNRESTRICTED PROCUREMENT. This will be a Competitive Request for Proposal (RFP),using BEST VALUE TRADE-OFF procedures, resulting in a firm fixed price contract. The estimated cost range of this procurement is $25,000,000.00 - $50,000,000.00.

10 see 007300

X X *Section 00 73 00

X 10

4 2 PM

March 17 2017

X

OFFER (Must be fully completed by offeror)

STANDARD FORM 1442 BACK (REV. 4-85)

14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR (Include ZIP Code) 15. TELEPHONE NUMBER (Include area code)

16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS (Include only if different than Item 14)

CODE FACILITY CODE

17. The offeror agrees to perform the work required at the prices specified below in strict accordance with the terms of this solicitation, if this offer is accepted by the Government in writing within calendar days after the date offers are due. (Insert any number equal or greater than the minimum requirement stated in 13D. Failure to insert any number means the offeror accepts the minimum in Item 13D.)

AMOUNTS

18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.

19. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF AMENDMENTS

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation - give number and date of each)

AMENDMENT NO.

DATE

20A. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN OFFER (Type or print) 20B. SIGNATURE 20C. OFFER DATE

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

21. ITEMS ACCEPTED

22. AMOUNT 23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

24.SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN

(4 copies unless otherwise specified)

ITEM 25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PURSUANT TO

10 U.S.C. 2304(c) ( ) 41 U.S.C. 253(c) ( )

26. ADMINISTERED BY 27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BYCODE

CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE

28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT (Contractor is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.) Contractor agrees to furnish and deliver all items or perform all work requirements identified on this form and any continuation sheets for the consideration stated in this contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract shall be governed by (a) this contract award, (b) the solicitation, and

(c) the clauses, representations, certifications, and specifications incorporated by reference in or attached to this contract.

29. AWARD. (Contractor is not required to sign this document.) Your offer on this solicitation is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This award consummates the contract, which consists of (a) the Government solicitation and your offer, and (b) this contract award. No further contractual document is necessary.

30A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN

(Type or print)

30B. SIGNATURE 30C. DATE

31A. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

31B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 31C. AWARD DATE

BY

DUNS NO.: TAX ID NO.:

CAGE CODE NO.:

( ) - ; FAX ( ) -

SEE PRICING SCHEDULE

SECTION 00 22 00 - 1

SECTION 00 22 00 - SUPPLEMENTARY INSTRUCTIONS

I. GENERAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

II. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS:

III. SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE PRICE PROPOSAL (VOLUME I):

IV. SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL (VOLUME II):

V. PROPOSAL COVER SHEET:

VI. PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT

VII. SMALL BUSINESS PARTICIPATION PLAN (FORM)

VIII. SAMPLE COVER LETTER

IX. NAVFAC/USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ-0)

SECTION 00 22 00 - 2

I. GENERAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

In order to effectively and equitably evaluate all offers, the Contracting Officer must receive sufficiently detailed information that clearly responds to the technical evaluation factors listed in Section 00 22 16.

Proposers shall submit their proposal packages in accordance with the instructions outlined in Section 00 21 00, 52.0000-4001-Directions for Submitting Offers.

Each Proposer must submit their responses to the technical evaluation factors in a Technical Proposal (Original Plus 4 copies) and Price Proposal (Original only). The Technical Proposal and Price Proposal must be submitted as separate distinct volumes. Both the Price Proposal (Volume I) and the Technical Proposal (Volume II) must be received by the closing date and time set for receipt of proposals.

No dollar amounts or pricing information from the Price Proposal are to be included in the responses to the technical evaluation factors.

All information intended by the Proposer to be evaluated must be submitted as part of the Technical Proposal.

II. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS:

All written portions: Use only 8 ½ by 11 inch paper, unless another size is specifically authorized elsewhere in this section for a particular submission. Do not use 11” X 14” or 11” X 17” size sheets (e.g. fold-outs) unless specifically authorized in this section for a particular submission. Do not use a font size smaller than 10, an unusual font style such as script, or condensed print.

Three-ring binders are preferred. Do not use spring clamps or exceed the recommended capacity of the fastener or binder. Do not use plastic multi-hole/spiral binding systems, heat binding systems, or other systems which do not facilitate the ready insertion of additional pages.

“Confidential” projects cannot be submitted to demonstrate capability unless all of the information required for evaluation as specified herein can nonetheless be provided to the Government as part of the Proposer’s Technical Proposal. Proposers that include in their proposals information that they do not want disclosed to the public for any purpose, or used by the Government except for evaluation purposes, must be clearly marked in accordance with the instructions at FAR 52.215-1, “Instructions to Proposer—Competitive Acquisition”, paragraph (3), “Restriction on disclosure and use of data”.

The Corps of Engineers recognizes that submittals by the Proposer may contain confidential or proprietary information; however, the Government reserves the right to make inquiries into the information disclosed. The submission of false or misleading information may be grounds for disqualification of the proposal.

Proposer(s) shall submit their proposal packages to the Los Angeles District Corps of Engineers (COE) in accordance with Section 00 21 00 of the solicitation.

SECTION 00 22 00 - 3

III. SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE PRICE PROPOSAL (VOLUME I):

Number of Sets of the Price Proposal: Submit One (1) original only.

Format and Contents of the Price Proposal/List of Tabs:

The Price Proposal shall be appropriately labeled as such and shall be organized as indicated in the following chart.

TAB CONTENTS OF THE PRICE PROPOSAL

TAB #1 SF 1442 Acknowledgement Sheet

TAB #2

CLIN Schedule (See Section 00 10 00) and Completed

Corporate Principal (See Section 00 01 05)

TAB #3 Bid Bond

TAB #4 Representations & Certifications

TAB #5 Joint Venture/Teaming Agreement (If Applicable)

TAB #6 Small Business Subcontracting Plan (If Applicable)

IV. SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL (VOLUME

II):

Number of Sets and Pages of the Technical Proposal: Submit original and four (4) additional sets of the written Technical Proposal, with each set separately packaged. In addition, submit one complete copy of the technical proposal on Compact Disk (CD) using a searchable “.pdf” file format. The Technical Proposals shall be in 8-1/2" x 11" format, bound as a single document, with single-sided or double-sided pages being acceptable. Condensed print is not permitted. The Proposals shall be separated with section tabs, and the tabs shall clearly identify the contents of each section. The Maximum number of pages for the Technical Proposal is fifty (50) pages single sided or twenty-five (25) pages double sided. The following items will not count against the page count: Table of Contents, Section Tabs, letters of appreciation and similar correspondence, up to 1 page per resume for each proposed team member (required from Factor 4) (single sided) of Resumes, CCASS/ACASS and the Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQs). Material contents of Technical Proposals that exceed fifty (50) pages will not be evaluated after page fifty (50). Each page shall be sequentially numbered for that section.

Format and Contents of the Technical Proposal/List of Tabs: The original and all copies of the technical proposal will be appropriately labeled as such. Each set shall be organized using the tabs specified in the chart below. The tabs directly correlate to the evaluation factors identified in Section 00 22 16.

SECTION 00 22 00 - 4

TAB CONTENTS OF VLOUME II TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

TAB #1 FACTOR 1: EXPERIENCE ON SIMILAR CONTRACTS

TAB #2

FACTOR 2: TECHNICAL APPROACH, METHODS AND

PROCEDURES

TAB #3

FACTOR 3: PAST PERFORMANCE ON RECENT AND

RELEVANT CONTRACTS

TAB #4 FACTOR 4: CORPORATE MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE

TAB #5 FACTOR 5: SCHEDULE

TAB #6 FACTOR 6: SMALL BUSINESS PARTICIPATION PLAN

Detailed Submission Requirements for the Technical Proposal: Submit detailed responses to the evaluation factors under each of the tabs. Specifics for the required information to be submitted are described in detail in Section 00 22 16.

FACTOR #1 EXPERIENCE ON SIMILAR CONTRACTS

FACTOR #2 TECHNICAL APPROACH, METHODS AND PROCEDURES

FACTOR #3 PAST PERFORMANCE ON RECENT AND RELEVANT CONTRACTS

FACTOR #4 CORPORATE MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE

FACTOR #5 SCHEDULE

FACTOR #6 SMALL BUSINESS PARTICIPATION PLAN

SECTION 00 22 00 - 5

V. PROPOSAL COVER SHEET:

Format for the Proposal Cover Sheet:

The proposal cover sheet is required by FAR 52.215-1(c) (i)-(v). This provision, titled “Instructions to Proposers—Competitive Acquisition,” has been provided in full text in Section 00 21 16. The format is as follows:

PROPOSAL COVER SHEET

1. Solicitation Number: W912PL-17-R-0017

2. The name, address, and telephone and facsimile numbers of the Proposer and electronic address (if available):

3. A statement specifying the extent of agreement with all terms, conditions, and provisions included in the solicitation and agreement to furnish any or all items upon which prices are offered at the price set opposite each item.

4. Names, titles, and telephone and facsimile numbers (and electronic addresses if available) of persons authorized to negotiate on the Proposer’s behalf with the Government in connection with this solicitation:

5. Name, title, and signature of person authorized to sign the proposal. Proposals signed by an agent shall be accompanied by evidence of that agent’s authority, unless that evidence has been previously furnished to the issuing office.

SECTION 00 22 00 - 6

VI. PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT

(To be completed by Proposer)

1. Contractor (Firm being evaluated):

Name: Address:

2. Contract Number: Task Order (TO) Number if Applicable:

3. Solicitation Type: Negotiated or Sealed Bid

4. Contract/TO Type: Fixed-Price Cost, Reimbursement, Hybrid (explain)

5. Routine Difficult (low to high) Complexity of Work 1 2 3 4 5

6. Contract/TO Dollar Value:

7. Contract/TO Status: Active Complete Completion Date (w/ extensions):

8. Description, location & relevancy of work:

9. Problems encountered and how resolved:

10. Name, Address, Telephone Number and E-mail of the Procuring Contracting Officer and/or the Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) (and other references, e.g., Administrative Contracting Officer, if applicable):

SECTION 00 22 00 - 7

11. Check one of the following blocks:

A written performance evaluation was received for this project and is attached.

A written performance evaluation was not received for this project. A Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) has been sent to the reference(s) listed in

Block 10, with a letter requesting that the completed questionnaire be returned directly to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers by the closing date for this solicitation.

SECTION 00 22 00 - 8

VII. SMALL BUSINESS PARTICIPATION PLAN (FORM)

(1) Check the applicable size and categories for the PRIME Offeror -- Check all applicable boxes:

{ } Large Prime or

{ } Small Business Prime; also categorized as a { } Small Disadvantaged Businesses { } Woman-Owned Small Business { } HUB Zone Small Business { } Veteran Owned Small Business { } Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business { } HBCU/MIs

(2) Submit the total combined percentage (must equal 100%) of work to be performed by both large and small businesses (include the percentage of work to be performed both by Prime and Sub-contractors):

Example: If Prime proposes a price of $1,000,000 (including all options), and small business(es) will provide $250,000 in services/supplies as a prime or subcontractor, the % planned for small businesses is 25%; and 75% for large business equaling 100%.

Percentage of Total Contract Dollars/Price

Total Percentage planned for Large Business(es) _______% Total Percentage planned for Small Business(es) _______%

(3) Please indicate the total percentage of participation to be performed by each type of small business.

The percentage of work performed by Small Businesses that qualify in multiple small business categories may be counted in each category:

Example: Victory Prop Mgt (WOSB and SDVOSB) performing 2%; and Gentleman Concierge (HubZone) and WOSB) performing 3%. Results equate to: HubZone 3%; WOSB 5%; SDVOSB

2%; VOSB 2%);.

SDVOSBs are also VOSBs automatically; however VOSBs are not automatically SDVOSBs.

Small Disadvantaged Businesses _________% HUB Zone Small Business _________% Woman Owned Small Business _________% Service Disabled Veteran Owned SB _________% Veteran Owned Small Business _________% HBCU/MIs _________%

(4) List principle supplies/services to be performed by Small Businesses:

Example: If a Small Business qualifies also as a WOSB and a SDVOSB, and you can add them

SECTION 00 22 00 - 9

to each category below in which they qualify.

Name of Company Identify Type of Service/Supply

Small:

Small Disadvantaged Businesses:

Women-Owned Small:

HUB Zone Small:

Veteran Owned Small:

Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small:

HBCU/MI:

(5) Describe the extent of commitment to use small businesses (for example, what types of commitments if any are in place for this specific acquisition either -- written, verbal, enforceable, non-enforceable, joint venturing, mentor-protégé, etc.)

SECTION 00 22 00 - 10

(6) Large Business Subcontracting Past Performance: Describe the extent to which you attained applicable goals for contracts that required you to submit a Subcontracting Plan. You may include copies of up to three ISRs (Individual Subcontracting Reports) to validate your past performance. You may also submit an explanation of your efforts, where you failed to meet goals.

Additional Important Note for Large Businesses only.

Small Business Sub-Contracting Plans (FAR 52.219-9)

Separate from the Small Business Participation Plan, large business offerors must also submit a Subcontracting Plan (Individual Contract Plan) as required by FAR 52.219-9. Large businesses will not be eligible for award if they fail to submit an acceptable Subcontracting Plan.

Subcontracting Plans shall reflect and be consistent with the commitments offered in the Small Business Participation Plan. In accordance with DFARS 215.304(c), when an evaluation assesses the extent that small businesses are specifically identified in proposals, the small businesses considered in the evaluation shall be listed in any subcontracting plan submitted.

SECTION 00 22 00 - 11

VIII. SAMPLE COVER LETTER

Date

SUBJECT: NAVFAC/USACE Past Performance Questionnaire

Name and Address of Reference

Ladies and Gentlemen:

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Los Angeles District, is conducting a review of our past performance history as part of an upcoming source selection acquisition.

Please complete the attached NAVFAC/USACE Past Performance Questionnaire to aid the Government in its evaluation of our past performance and FAX it directly to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, ATTN: Ryan Rivas at (213) 452-3176. If you prefer, you may provide the requested information by email to ryan.e.rivas@usace.army.mil.

The Government is requesting receipt of this information five calendar days before proposal due date.

You are advised that it is Government policy that the identity of sources providing past performance information will not be released outside the Government.

We appreciate your efforts to help the Government fairly evaluate our record of past performance. Should you have any questions related to this matter, please contact Mr. Ryan Rivas at telephone (213) 452-3310.

Sincerely, Contractor

Attachment mailto:Christina.chavez@usace.army.mil

SECTION 00 22 00 - 12

IX. NAVFAC/USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form

PPQ-0)

CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)

1. Contractor Information Firm Name: CAGE Code:

Address: DUNs Number:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

Point of Contact:

Contact Phone Number:

2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain) Percent of project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):

3. Contract Information Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please specify):

Contract Title:

Contract Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Explain Differences:

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):

Explain Differences:

4. Project Description:

Complexity of Work High Med Routine How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)

CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)

SECTION 00 22 00 - 13

5. Client Information Name:

Title:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

6. Describe the client’s role in the project:

7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):

8. Client’s Signature:

NOTE: NAVFAC/USACE REQUESTS THAT THE CLIENT COMPLETES THIS

QUESTIONNAIRE AND SUBMITS DIRECTLY BACK TO THE PROPOSER. THE

PROPOSER WILL SUBMIT THE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO USACE WITH

THEIR PROPOSAL, AND MAY DUPLICATE THIS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FUTURE

SUBMISSION ON USACE SOLICITATIONS. CLIENTS ARE HIGHLY

ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT QUESTIONNAIRES DIRECTLY TO THE PROPOSER.

HOWEVER, QUESTIONNAIRES MAY BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO USACE.

PLEASE CONTACT THE PROPOSER FOR USACE POC INFORMATION. THE

GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO VERIFY ANY AND ALL

INFORMATION ON THIS FORM.

ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE

RATING DEFINITION NOTE

(E) Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.

An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating.

Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

SECTION 00 22 00 - 14

(VG) Very Good

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.

(S) Satisfactory Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.

(M) Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.

(U) Unsatisfactory

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.

(N) Not Applicable

No information or did not apply to your contract

Rating will be neither positive nor negative.

SECTION 00 22 00 - 15

TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT

PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.

1. QUALITY:

a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts E VG S M U N

b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance

E VG S M U

N

c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance

E VG S M U

N

d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance)

E VG S M U

N

2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF

PERFORMANCE:

a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below)

E VG S M U

N

b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract

E VG S M U

N

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project?

E VG S M U

N

b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes; responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication)

E VG S M U

N

c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer?

E VG S M U

N

d) Overall customer satisfaction E VG S M U N

4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR

a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force?

E VG S M U

N

b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce

E VG S M U

N

SECTION 00 22 00 - 16

to this effort

c) Government Property Control E VG S M U N

d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel

E VG S M U

N

e) Utilization of Small Business concerns E VG S M U N

f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines

E VG S M U

N

g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes

E VG S M U

N

h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)

E VG S M U

N

SECTION 00 22 00 - 17

5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)?

E VG S M U

N

b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client

E VG S M U

N

c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns)

E VG S M U

N

d) Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section.

Yes No

e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?

Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.

Yes No

f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below. Yes No

6. SAFETY/SECURITY

a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues? (Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.)

E VG S M U

N

b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements.

E VG S M U

N

7. GENERAL

a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues).

E VG S M U

N

b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues)

E VG S M U

N

c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below) Yes No

SECTION 00 22 00 - 18

d) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor.

E VG S M U

N

Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks.

Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary).

FY 16 Live Ordnance Loading Area (LOLA) W912PL-17-R-0017

SECTION 00 22 16-1

Source Selection Information

SECTION 00 22 16 - SUPPLEMENTRAY INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS

I. ELIGIBILITY FOR CONTRACT AWARD

II. SOURCE SELECTION USING THE TRADE-OFF PROCESS

III. LIST OF THE TECHNICAL EVALUATION FACTORS

IV. THE RELATIVE WEIGHTS OF THE TECHNICAL EVALUATION

FACTORS

V. TECHNICAL RATING

VI. DEFINITIONS

VII. DEBRIEFING OFFERORS

VIII. TECHNICAL EVALUATION FACTORS AND EVALUATION CRITERIA 6

IX. PERFORMANCE CONFIDENCE ASSESSMENT

X. EVALUATION OF THE PRICE PROPOSAL

XI. INTENT TO AWARD WITHOUT DISCUSSIONS

XII. PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL

SECTION 00 22 16- 2

I. ELIGIBILITY FOR CONTRACT AWARD

In accordance with the Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR), no contract will be entered into unless the Contracting Officer ensures that all requirements of law, executive orders, regulations, and all other applicable procedures, including clearances and approvals, have been met. This includes the FAR requirement that no award shall be made unless the Contracting Officer makes an affirmative determination of responsibility. To be determined responsible, a prospective contractor must meet the general standards in FAR Part 9 and any special standards set forth in the solicitation.

II. SOURCE SELECTION USING THE TRADE-OFF PROCESS

The Government will select the offer that represents the best value to the Government by using the trade-off process described in FAR Part 15. This process permits tradeoffs between price and technical merit/quality and allows the Government to accept other than the lowest priced offer.

The award decision will be based on a comparative assessment of proposals against all source selection criteria in the solicitation.

All non-cost (i.e., technical) evaluation factors, when combined, are approximately equal to price. The Government is concerned with striking the most advantageous balance between Technical merit (quality) and cost to the Government (the price). The degree of importance of price could become greater depending upon the equality of the proposals for the non-price technical evaluation factors. Where competing technical proposals are determined to be substantially equal, price could become the controlling factor.

III. LIST OF THE TECHNICAL EVALUATION FACTORS

The Technical Proposal will be evaluated based on the following technical evaluation factors

The solicitation will be issued as a design-build RFP and the following factors will be included:

• Factor 1: Experience on Similar Contracts

• Factor 2: Technical Approach, Methods, and Procedures

• Factor 3: Past Performance on Recent, Relevant Contracts

• Factor 4: Corporate Management Structure

• Factor 5: Schedule

SECTION 00 22 16- 3

• Factor 6: Small Business Participation Plan

IV. THE RELATIVE WEIGHTS OF THE TECHNICAL EVALUATION FACTORS

All non-cost (i.e., technical) evaluation factors, when combined, are approximately equal to price. The Government is concerned with striking the most advantageous balance between Technical merit (quality) and cost to the Government (the price). The degree of importance of price could become greater depending upon the equality of the proposals for the non-price technical evaluation factors. Where competing technical proposals are determined to be substantially equal, price could become the controlling factor.

The non-price evaluation factors are listed in descending order of importance.

The following factor is the most important and when combined with Factor 2 is worth significantly more than the combined weight of remaining factors.

Factor 1 EXPERIENCE ON SIMILAR CONTRACTS

The following factor (Factor 2) is approximately equal in importance to Factor 1.

Factor 2 TECHNICAL APPROACH, METHODS AND PROCEDURES

The following factor (Factor 3) is less important than the previous factors (Factors 1 and 2).

Factor 3 PAST PERFORMANCE ON RECENT RELEVANT CONTRACTS

The following factor (Factor 4) is less important than the previous factor (Factor 3).

Factor 4 CORPORATE MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE

The following factor (Factor 5) is equal in importance to the previous factor (Factor 4).

Factor 5 SCHEDULE

SECTION 00 22 16- 4

The following factor (Factor 6) is less important than Factor 4 and 5.

Factor 6 SMALL BUSINESS UTILIZATION

V. TECHNICAL RATING

The Source Selection Team (SST) will use a combined technical/risk rating system that includes consideration of risk in conjunction with the strengths, weaknesses, and deficiencies in determining technical ratings. Assessment of technical risk, which is manifested by the identification of weakness(es), considers potential for disruption of schedule, increased costs, degradation of performance, the need for increased Government oversight, and/or the likelihood of unsuccessful contract performance. Combined technical/risk evaluations shall utilize the combined technical/risk ratings listed in Table 1 and the risk descriptions set forth in Table 2.

Table 1. Combined Technical/Risk Ratings Color Rating Description

Blue

Outstanding

Proposal indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements and contains multiple strengths, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

Purple

Good

Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and contains at least one strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low to moderate.

Green

Acceptable

Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

Yellow

Marginal

Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is high.

SECTION 00 22 16- 5

Red

Unacceptable

Proposal does not meet requirements of the solicitation, and thus, contains one or more deficiencies, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is unacceptable. Proposal is unawardable.

Table 2. Technical Risk Rating Method

Rating Description

Low Proposal may contain weakness(es) which have little potential to cause disruption of schedule, increased cost or degradation of performance. Normal contractor effort and normal Government monitoring will likely be able to overcome any difficulties.

Moderate

Proposal contains a significant weakness or combination of weaknesses which may potentially cause disruption of schedule, increased cost or degradation of performance. Special contractor emphasis and close Government monitoring will likely be able to overcome difficulties.

High

Proposal contains a significant weakness or combination of weaknesses which is likely to cause significant disruption of schedule, increased cost or degradation of performance. Is unlikely to overcome any difficulties, even with special contractor emphasis and close Government monitoring.

Unacceptable

Proposal contains a material failure or a combination of significant weaknesses that increases the risk of unsuccessful performance to an unacceptable level.

VI. DEFINITIONS

Rating: The rating for the Technical factor will be expressed as an adjectival assessment of Outstanding, Good, Acceptable, Marginal, or Unacceptable.

Deficiency: A material failure of a proposal to meet a Government requirement or a combination of significant weaknesses in a proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level.

Strength: Any aspect of an offeror’s proposal that has merit or exceeds specified performance or capability requirements in a way that will be advantageous to the Government during contract performance.

SECTION 00 22 16- 6

Weakness: A flaw in the proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance.

VII. DEBRIEFING OFFERORS

Offerors may request a debriefing in accordance with FAR 15.505 Pre-award Debriefing of offerors, and FAR 15.506 Post-award Debriefing of offerors.

VIII. TECHNICAL EVALUATION FACTORS AND EVALUATION CRITERIA

The weighting of the evaluation factors takes into consideration not only how important that particular factor is to the overall project, but also the latitude for the Offeror to provide features that would be more advantageous to the Government. An evaluation of technical quality/technical merit is inherent in these criteria. Proposals, which exceed the minimum criteria or include desirable betterments will therefore be rated higher than proposals which only meet the minimum criteria in accordance with the value of these features to the Government.

Risk to the Government will be evaluated. Proposal risk is an assessment of the weaknesses and risks associated with the Offerors proposed approach derived from the technical evaluation.

Performance risk is an assessment of the Offeror’s demonstrated performance on recent, relevant contracts relative to the past performance factor.

FACTOR 1: EXPERIENCE ON SIMILAR CONTRACTS

This factor will evaluate the extent of an offeror’s successful experience and proposed team’s experience (key subcontractors) on projects of similar type, scope, magnitude and complexity as compared to the work that is required under this RFP.

The following are the minimum requirements that are key to successful contract performance to demonstrate experience on similar contracts. Offeror must show a minimum 2 projects completed or substantially completed (70% complete) each with Contract Values of $20M or more where they acted as the General Contractor. Offeror shall show experience utilizing Design Build method of construction (one project with a value of $7.5 M or greater). Offeror shall also show experience in vertical building construction with an approximate value of $7.5M or greater (one project). All of these projects should have been completed within 5 years.

The Offeror, Joint Venture Partner, Teaming partner or Key Subcontractor that will perform the paving portion of the project must show a minimum of two projects of concrete airfield paving completed or substantially completed (70% complete) within the last 5 years with each project

SECTION 00 22 16- 7

having an value of $7.5M or greater for the paving portion of the work. Paving must have used the slip form method. At least one of the paving projects submitted shall demonstrate experience on paving for military construction projects utilizing specification UFGS 32 13 11 "Concrete Pavements for Airfields". Joint Venture Partner, Teaming partner or Key Subcontractor must provide documentation signed by an Officer of the Company that they are committed to performing the airfield paving work as specified in the RFP

Offeror’s Designer shall show experience in large scale concrete Airfield Paving as well as building/facility design. Offerors Design Subcontractor shall show a minimum of two projects completed or substantially completed (70% complete) within the last 5 years showing this experience (Note: projects do not need to show both airfield paving and building/facility in the same projects, they may be different projects, however two projects need to be shown for each work type). For the airfield paving projects, projects shall be designed for military concrete airfield paving utilizing Corps of Engineers PCASE and using UFGS 32 13 11 "Concrete Pavements for Airfields". Projects submitted should be similar in, scope and complexity of this

RFP.

Project description should explain how and why Offeror considers this to be similar to the RFP project. Provide a brief description of each project, describe its scope of the work, total dollar value of the contract at the time of award and at the time of completion. It is anticipate that the following will be the maximum amount of projects submitted:

No Demonstrating Value Remarks 2 GC Management $20M 1 GC utilizing DB $7.5M 1 GC Vertical Building $7.5M

2 Key Sub Paving $7.5M Emphasis on MIL Concrete Paving

2 A/E Building Similar 2 A/E Paving Similar Must be MIL Concrete Paving

Provide the name, address and telephone number of the owner. In the case of a federal, state or local government project, provide the name, address, and telephone number of the contracting officer. Information submitted on projects currently under construction will only be evaluated if the work is completed to an extent, from which experience can be creditable, i.e., at least 70% complete. Projects older than five years will carry little weight for evaluation purposes.

Standard for Acceptability: This standard is met when the Offeror can identify completed projects for each of the requirements noted above and that are similar in scope, magnitude and

SECTION 00 22 16- 8

complexity and meet Factor 1 requirements.

FACTOR 2: TECHNICAL APPROACH, METHODS AND PROCEDURES

Proposals will be evaluated as to the Offeror’s…