W912PL-17-R-0011_Amendment0001.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICAITON NO. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicble)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

FACILITY CODE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICIATION NO.

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a)By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment your desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPIRATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc. ) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15C. DATE SIGNED

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION ( Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

PAGE OF PAGES

6. ISSUED BY CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)

CODE

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

Previous edition unusable

0001 Apr 21, 2017

W912PL

CONTRACTING DIVISION

915 Wilshire Blvd

LOS ANGELES, CA 90053-2325

SEE ITEM 6

W912PL-17-R-0011

Mar 24, 2017

FY 16 F-35 Airfield Pavements, Nellis AFB, Nevada

1. Please see attached Amendment 0001 summary sheet for all revisions.

Sandra Oquita

CONTRACTING OFFICER

INSTRUCTIONS

Instructions for items other than those that are self-explanatory, are as follows:

Item 1 (Contract ID Code) . Insert the contract type identification code that appears in the title block of the contract being modified.

Item 3 (Effective date) .

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

For a solicitation amendment, change order, or administrative change, the effective date shall be the issue date of the amendment, change order, or administrative change.

For a supplemental agreement, the effective date shall be the date agreed to by the contracting parties.

For a modification issued as an initial or confirming notice of termination for the convenience of the Government, the effective date and the modification number of the confirming notice shall be the same as the effective date and modification number of the initial notice.

For a modification converting a termination for default to a termination for the convenience of the Government, the effective date shall be the same as the effective date of the termination for default.

For a modification confirming the contacting officer's determination of the amount due in settlement of a contract termination, the effective date shall be the same as the effective date of the initial decision.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

Item 6 (Issued By) . Insert the name and address of the issuing office. If applicable, insert the appropriate issuing office code in the code block.

Item 8 (Name and Address of Contractor) . For modifications to a contract or order, enter the contractor's name, address, and code as shown in the original contract or order, unless changed by this or a previous modification.

Item 9, (Amendment of Solicitation No. - Dated), and 10, (Modification of Contract/Order No. - Dated ). Check the appropriate box and in the corresponding blanks insert the number and date of the original solicitation, contract, or order.

Item 12 (Accounting and Appropriation Data) .

When appropriate, indicate the impact of the modification on each affected accounting classification by inserting one of the following entries.

(2) Accounting classification Net decrease $

Include subject matter or short title of solicitation/contract where feasible.

Item 16B . The contracting officer's signature is not required on solicitation amendments. The contracting offier's signature is normally affixed last on supplemental agreements.

(i)

NOTE: If there are changes to multiple accounting classifications that cannot be placed in block 12, insert an asterisk and the words "See continuation sheet".

Item 13 . Check the appropriate box to indicate the type of modification. Insert in the corresponding blank the authority under which the modification is issued. Check whether or not contractor must sign this document. (See FAR 43.103.)

Item 14 (Description of Amendment/Modification) .

Organize amendments or modifications under the appropriate Uniform Contract Format (UCF) section headings from the applicable solicitation or contract. The UCF table of contents, however, shall not be set forth in this document Indicate the impact of the modification on the overall total contract price by inserting one of the following entries:

Total contract price increased by $

Total contract price decreased by $

Total contract price unchanged.

State reason for modification.

When removing, reinstating, or adding funds, identify the contract items and accounting classifications.

When the SF 30 is used to reflect a determination by the contracting officer of the amount due in settlement of a contract terminated for the convenience of the Government, the entry in Item 14 of the modification may be limited to --

A reference to the letter determination; and

A statement of the net amount determined to be due in settlement of the contract.

(g)

(h)

(i)

(ii)

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(i)

(ii)

(iii)

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83) BACK

(1) Accounting classification Net increase $

RFP No. W912PL-17-R-0011

U.S. ARMY CORPS

OF ENGINEERS

LOS ANGELES DISTRICT

FY16 F-35 Airfield Pavements

Nellis Air Force Base, Nevada

Unrestricted Request for Proposal

Design-Bid-Build Best Value Trade-Off

Construction Solicitation and Specifications

March 2017

FY16 F-35 Airfield Pavements Nellis AFB, NV

W912PL-17-R-0011

Amendment 0001

TABLE OF CONTENTS - 1

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SF-1442 Solicitation, Offer and Award

DIVISION 00 – BIDDING REQUIREMENTS, CONTRACT FORMS AND CONTRACT

CONDITIONS

00 01 05 Certification Page (Corporate Principal) 00 10 00 Solicitation Contract Line Item (CLIN) Schedule 00 20 00 Instructions for Procurement 00 21 16 Instructions to Proposers Am1 00 22 00 Supplementary Instructions 00 22 16 Supplementary Instructions to Proposers Am1 00 45 00 Representations and Certifications 00 70 00 Conditions of the Contract 00 73 00 Supplementary Conditions Am1 00 73 46 Wage Rates

DIVISION 01 – GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

01 00 00 General Requirements 01 32 01 Project Schedule 01 33 00 Submittal Procedures 01 33 29 Sustainability Reporting 01 35 13 Special Project Procedures Airfield Safety 01 35 26 Governmental Safety Requirements 01 42 00 Sources for Reference Publications 01 45 00 Quality Control 01 45 00.10 Quality Control System QCS 01 50 00 Temporary Construction Facilities and Controls 01 57 20 Environmental Protection Am1 01 57 23 Temporary Storm Water Pollution Control 01 74 19 Construction and Demolition Waste Management 01 78 00 Closeout Submittals 01 78 23 Operation and Maintenance Data

DIVISION 02 – EXISTING CONDITIONS

02 41 00 Demolition

W912PL-17-R-0011

Amendment 0001

TABLE OF CONTENTS - 2

DIVISION 03 – CONCRETE

03 30 53 Miscellaneous Cast-In-place Concrete 03 42 13 Plant-Precast Concrete Products for below Grade Construction

DIVISION 26 – ELECTRICAL

26 20 00 Interior Distribution System 26 56 00 Exterior lighting 26 56 20 Airfield and Heliport Lighting and Visual Navigation Aids

Division 31 – EARTHWORK

31 00 00 Earthwork

DIVISION 32 - EXTERIOR IMPROVEMENTS

32 01 19 Field Molded Sealants for Sealing Joints in Rigid Pavements 32 11 16 Subbase Course 32 11 23 Aggregate Base Course 32 12 10 Bituminous Tack Coats 32 12 15.13 Hot-Mix Asphalt Airfield Paving 32 13 11 Concrete Pavement for Airfield and other Heavy-Duty Pavements 32 13 73 Compression Joint Seals for Concrete Pavements 32 15 00 Aggregate Surface Course 32 17 24 Pavement Markings 32 31 13 Chain Link Fences and Gates

DIVISION 33 – UTILITIES

33 11 00 Water Distribution 33 30 00 Sanitary Sewers 33 40 00 Storm Drainage Utilities 33 71 02 Underground Electrical Distribution 33 82 00 Telecommunications Outside Plant Osp

DIVISION 34 – TRANSPORTATION

34 73 13 Mooring and Grounding Points for Aircraft

W912PL-17-R-0011

Amendment 0001

TABLE OF CONTENTS - 3

DRAWINGS

- Civil Sheets –

- Electrical Sheets

DESIGN ANALYSIS – 100% PHASE

- Design Analysis No: 229-11-704

- Drawing File No: 229-25-706

- Specification No 2070

SOLICITATION, OFFER,

AND AWARD

(Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

1. SOLICITATION NUMBER 2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

SEALED BID (IFB)

NEGOTIATED (RFP)

3. DATE ISSUED PAGE OF PAGES

IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by the offeror.

4. CONTRACT NUMBER 5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NUMBER 6. PROJECT NUMBER

7. ISSUED BY CODE 8. ADDRESS OFFER TO

9. FOR INFORMATION CALL

A. NAME B. TELEPHONE NUMBER (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS)

SOLICITATION

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".

10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS (Title, identifying number, date):

11. The Contractor shall begin performance within calendar days and complete it within calendar days after receiving award, notice to proceed. This performance period is mandatory, negotiable. (See .)

12A. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE PAYMENT BONDS?

(If "YES," indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12B.)

12B. CALENDAR DAYS

YES NO

13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:

A. Sealed offers in original and copies to perform the work required are due at the place specified in Item 8 by (hour) local time (date). If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers will be publicly opened at that time. Sealed envelopes containing offers shall be marked to show the offeror’s name and address, the solicitation number, and the date and time offers are due.

B. An offer guarantee is, is not required.

C. All offers are subject to the (1) work requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.

D. Offers providing less than calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due will not be considered and will be rejected.

NSN 7540-01-155-3212

Designed using Perform Pro, WHS/DIOR, Oct 96

1442-103 STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 4-85) (EG)

Prescribed by GSA - FAR (48 CFR) 53.236-1(d)Amendment 0001

W912PL-17-R-0011

X

Mar 24 2017 1 OF 2

USACE, Los Angeles District Contracting Division, East Region Branch 915 Wilshire Blvd Los Angeles, CA 90017

See Item 7

Jimmy L. Barton (213) 452-3251

Design-Bid-Build FY 16 F-35 Apron Airfield Pavements, Nellis AFB, Nevada Construct airfield pavements using 86,100 SM of 15 to 18-inches (medium load design) 700 PSI flex-strength Portland Cement Concrete for aircraft parking ramp; includes 66,100 SM of asphalt shoulders, base and sub-base, drainage systems, apron lighting, edge lighting, pavement marking, earthwork and grading, utilities, pre-formed compression joint seals, aircraft tie-downs and grounding points, replace satellite fire station parking lot, AGE yard, road relocation, spall repair, concrete apron and joint seal replacement, and all other work as necessary. Facilities will be designed as permanent construction in accordance with the DoD Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC) 1-200-01.

This project will comply with DoD antiterrorism/force protection requirements per UFC 4-101-01.

The solicitation will be prepared in accordance with FAR 15, and include evaluation factors, developed in accordance with FAR 15.304.

THIS IS AN UNRESTRICTED PROCUREMENT. This will be a Competitive Request for Proposal(RFP),using Best Value Lowest price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) procedures, resulting in a firm fixed price contract. The estimated cost range of this procurement is $25,000,000.00 - $50,000,000.00.

10 see 007300

X X *Section 00 73 00

X 10

3 2 PM

May 9, 2017

X

OFFER (Must be fully completed by offeror)

STANDARD FORM 1442 BACK (REV. 4-85)

14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR (Include ZIP Code) 15. TELEPHONE NUMBER (Include area code)

16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS (Include only if different than Item 14)

CODE FACILITY CODE

17. The offeror agrees to perform the work required at the prices specified below in strict accordance with the terms of this solicitation, if this offer is accepted by the Government in writing within calendar days after the date offers are due. (Insert any number equal or greater than the minimum requirement stated in 13D. Failure to insert any number means the offeror accepts the minimum in Item 13D.)

AMOUNTS

18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.

19. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF AMENDMENTS

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation - give number and date of each)

AMENDMENT NO.

DATE

20A. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN OFFER (Type or print) 20B. SIGNATURE 20C. OFFER DATE

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

21. ITEMS ACCEPTED

22. AMOUNT 23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

24.SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN

(4 copies unless otherwise specified)

ITEM 25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PURSUANT TO

10 U.S.C. 2304(c) ( ) 41 U.S.C. 253(c) ( )

26. ADMINISTERED BY 27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BYCODE

CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE

28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT (Contractor is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.) Contractor agrees to furnish and deliver all items or perform all work requirements identified on this form and any continuation sheets for the consideration stated in this contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract shall be governed by (a) this contract award, (b) the solicitation, and

(c) the clauses, representations, certifications, and specifications incorporated by reference in or attached to this contract.

29. AWARD. (Contractor is not required to sign this document.) Your offer on this solicitation is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This award consummates the contract, which consists of (a) the Government solicitation and your offer, and (b) this contract award. No further contractual document is necessary.

30A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN

(Type or print)

30B. SIGNATURE 30C. DATE

31A. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

31B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 31C. AWARD DATE

BY

Amendment 0001

DUNS NO.: TAX ID NO.:

CAGE CODE NO.:

( ) - ; FAX ( ) -

SEE PRICING SCHEDULE

FY16 F-35 Airfield Pavements W912PL-17-R-0011 Nellis, AFB, NV Amendment No. 0001

SF‐30 cont. ‐ 1 Amendment 0001

Specifications

Cover Page Change Description from Design‐Build to Design‐Bid‐Build

00 22 16 (1) Page 4, Under Standard Acceptability, change Design‐Build to Design‐Bid‐

Build.

(2) Page 9, Under Standard Acceptability, change Design‐Build to Design‐Bid‐

Build.

00 73 00 Delete the following Design‐Build related Clauses:

Sequence of Design‐Construction

52.236‐25 Requirements for Registration of Designers (Jun 2003)

52.236‐5004 Responsibility of the Contractor for Design (May 2002)

52.236‐5005 Warranty of Design (Firm‐Fixed Price Design‐Build Contract) May

2002)

52.236‐5006 Deviating from the Accepted Design (Jun 2002)

52.236‐5007 Constructor’s Role during Design Process (Jun 1998)

52.236‐5008 Value Engineering after Award (Jun 1999)

52.236‐5010 Government Re‐Use of Design (May 2006)

01 57 20 Environmental Protection – Delete Section in its entirety and Replace

SF‐1442 Change Project Description from Design‐Build to Design‐Bid‐Build.

FY16 F-35 Pavements, Nellis, AFB, NV W912PL-17-R-0011

SECTION 00 22 16-1

SECTION 00 22 16 - SUPPLEMENTRAY INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS

I. ELIGIBILITY FOR CONTRACT AWARD

II. SOURCE SELECTION USING THE TRADE-OFF PROCESS

III. LIST OF THE TECHNICAL EVALUATION FACTORS

IV. THE RELATIVE WEIGHTS OF THE TECHNICAL EVALUATION FACTORS

V. TECHNICAL EVALUATION FACTORS AND EVALUATION CRITERIA

VI. EVALUATION OF THE PRICE PROPOSAL

VII. INTENT TO AWARD WITHOUT DISCUSSION

VIII. DISCUSSION PROCESS

IX. FINAL PROPOSAL REVISIONS

X. DEBRIEFINGS

XI. PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL

FY 16F-35 Pavements, Nellis AFB, NV W912PL-17-R-0011

SECTION 00 22 16- 2

SECTION 00 22 16

SUPPLEMENTRAY INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS

I. ELIGIBILITY FOR CONTRACT AWARD

In accordance with the Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR), no contract will be entered into unless the Contracting Officer ensures that all requirements of law, executive orders, regulations, and all other applicable procedures, including clearances and approvals, have been met. This includes the FAR requirement that no award shall be made unless the Contracting Officer makes an affirmative determination of responsibility. To be determined responsible, a prospective contractor must meet the general standards in FAR Part 9 and any special standards set forth in the solicitation.

II. SOURCE SELECTION USING THE TRADE-OFF PROCESS

The Government will select the offer that represents the best value to the Government by using the trade-off process described in FAR Part 15. This process permits tradeoffs between price and technical merit/quality and allows the Government to accept other than the lowest priced offer.

The award decision will be based on a comparative assessment of proposals against all source selection criteria in the solicitation.

All non-cost (i.e., technical) evaluation factors, when combined, are approximately equal to price. The Government is concerned with striking the most advantageous balance between Technical merit (quality) and cost to the Government (the price). The degree of importance of price could become greater depending upon the equality of the proposals for the non-price technical evaluation factors. Where competing technical proposals are determined to be substantially equal, price could become the controlling factor.

III. LIST OF THE TECHNICAL EVALUATION FACTORS

The Technical Proposal will be evaluated based on the following technical evaluation factors

FACTOR 1 - EXPERIENCE ON SIMILAR CONTRACTS

FACTOR 2 - TECHNICAL APPROACH, METHODS AND PROCEDURES

FACTOR 3 - PAST PERFORMANCE ON RECENT, RELEVANT CONTRACTS

FACTOR 4 - CORPORATE MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE FACTOR

FACTOR 5 - SCHEDULE

FACTOR 6 - SMALL BUSINESS UTILIZATION PLAN

IV. THE RELATIVE WEIGHTS OF THE TECHNICAL EVALUATION FACTORS

The non-price evaluation factors are listed in descending order of importance.

Nellis AFB, NV W912PL-17-R-0011

SECTION 00 22 16- 3

The following factor is the most important and when combined with Factor 2 and 3 is worth significantly more than the combined weight of remaining factors.

Factor 1 EXPERIENCE ON SIMILAR CONTRACTS

The following factor (Factor 2) is slightly less important than Factor 1.

Factor 2 TECHNICAL APPROACH, METHODS AND PROCEDURES

The following factor (Factor 3) is equal in importance to Factor 2.

Factor 3 PAST PERFORMANCE ON RECENT RELEVANT CONTRACTS

The following factor (Factor 4) is less important than Factor 2 and Factor 3.

Factor 4 CORPORATE MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE

The following factor (Factor 5) is equal in importance to the previous factor (Factor 4).

Factor 5 SCHEDULE

The following factor (Factor 6) is less important than Factor 4 and 5.

Factor 6 SMALL BUSINESS UTILIZATION

V. TECHNICAL EVALUATION FACTORS AND EVALUATION CRITERIA

The weighting of the evaluation factors takes into consideration not only how important that particular factor is to the overall project, but also the latitude for the Offeror to provide features that would be more advantageous to the Government. An evaluation of technical quality/technical merit is inherent in these criteria. Proposals, which exceed the minimum criteria or include desirable betterments will therefore be rated higher than proposals which only meet the minimum criteria in accordance with the value of these features to the Government.

Risk to the Government will be evaluated. Proposal risk is an assessment of the weaknesses and risks associated with the Offerors proposed approach derived from the technical evaluation.

Performance risk is an assessment of the Offeror’s demonstrated performance on recent, relevant contracts relative to the past performance factor.

FACTOR 1: EXPERIENCE ON SIMILAR CONTRACTS

Nellis AFB, NV W912PL-17-R-0011

SECTION 00 22 16- 4

This factor will evaluate the extent of an offeror’s successful experience and proposed team’s experience (key subcontractors) on projects of similar type, scope, magnitude and complexity as compared to the work that is required under this RFP.

The following are the minimum requirements that are key to successful contract performance to demonstrate experience on similar contracts. Offeror must show a minimum 2 projects completed or substantially completed (70% complete) with Contract Values of $20M or more where they acted as the General Contractor. At least one of the projects shall be horizontal-civil type construction. All of these projects should have been substantially completed within 5 years.

The Offeror, Joint Venture Partner, Teaming partner or Key Subcontractor responsible for the paving must show a minimum two projects of concrete airfield paving completed or substantially completed (70% complete) within the last 5 years with a value of $7.5M or greater for the paving portion of the work. Paving must have used the slip form method. At least one of the paving projects shall be military construction paving utilizing specification UFGS 32 13 11 "Concrete Pavements for Airfields". Joint Venture Partner, Teaming partner or Key Subcontractor must provide documentation signed by an Officer of the Company that they are committed to performing the airfield paving work as specified in the RFP

Project description should explain how and why Offeror considers this to be similar to the RFP project. Provide a brief description of each project, describe its scope of the work, total dollar value of the contract at the time of award and at the time of completion. Provide the name, address and telephone number of the owner. In the case of a federal, state or local government project, provide the name, address, and telephone number of the contracting officer. Information submitted on projects currently under construction will only be evaluated if the work is completed to an extent, from which experience can be creditable, i.e., at least 70% complete.

Projects older than five years will carry little weight for evaluation purposes.

Standard for Acceptability: This standard is met when the Offeror can identify completed projects for each of the requirements noted above and that are similar in scope, magnitude and complexity and meet Factor 1 requirements.

FACTOR 2: TECHNICAL APPROACH, METHODS AND PROCEDURES

Proposals will be evaluated as to the Offeror’s ability to perform and to satisfy all contract requirements. The Technical Approach should demonstrate a clear understanding of the following:

a. Airfield Grading and Paving process. As a minimum, Offeror shall discuss grading plan, excavated material disposal, tying into the existing apron, proposed aggregate supplier and testing/approval of mix design, concrete plant erection and operation, paving operation, mooring and grounding points, testing, and project acceptance procedures.

Offeror shall describe mixing, placement and testing operations.

b. Site Utilities, Roads, Parking and Drainage construction. As a minimum, Offeror shall discuss, site utility work including various utility relocations or tie-ins, drainage structures, new roadway relocation and tie-in, and apron electrical and lighting.

c. Safety and security plans and issues working on an active flight line.

Nellis AFB, NV W912PL-17-R-0011

SECTION 00 22 16- 5

d. Any environmental issues.

e. Contractor CQC system implementation and utilization of the Corps of Engineers RMS system.

Standard Acceptability: This standard is met when the Offeror demonstrates a commitment to accomplish all the work in accordance with the Design-Bid-Build technical solicitation requirements and the requirements of Factor 2.

FACTOR 3: PAST PERFORMANCE ON RECENT, RELEVANT PROJECTS

This area considers the Offeror's capabilities and past performance for successful completion of recent, relevant construction projects. Offeror(s) shall submit the following as part of their offers.

Evaluation Factor: The following are the minimum requirements that are key to successful contract performance to demonstrate contractor capability to perform the proposed effort. The criteria to establish what is recent and relevant and how well the contractor performed on the contracts will be based upon the efforts of similar scope, magnitude, and complexity of projects successfully completed within the past five years (projects in Tab #1) and projects substantially completed. In the event of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or of whom information on past performance is not available, the offeror will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on this factor.

1. Identify all contracts, including Federal, State, local government and private/commercial, for efforts similar to the Government requirement of similar scope, magnitude, and complexity which are either successfully completed within the past five years. Projects included in Factor 1 will carry more weight and be evaluated more heavily. For each project identified, describe the scope of the work, contract price at the time of award, project cost growth during contract performance, and contract price at the time of completion. Include explanation of the reasons for cost growth. Describe for each project the contract performance period set forth in the contract, time growth during contract performance, if any, and the number of days from the start of the project to acceptance by the owner/government agency. Include explanation for reasons for time growth. Identify and describe any warranty issues raised by the owner, and how the problems were resolved; if no warranty issues were raised, offerors should so state.

Offeror is encouraged to provide information on problems encountered on the projects and the offeror’s corrective action. Past performance on State, local, and private/ commercial contracts will be evaluated equally with past performance on Federal contracts. Offeror(s) are encouraged to provide information regarding predecessor companies, key personnel who have relevant experience or subcontractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement when such information is relevant to this solicitation. Important Note: See paragraph 5 below regarding required consent for release of subcontractor past performance information. For each project, submit the following information in the formats provided at the end of this Section:

Nellis AFB, NV W912PL-17-R-0011

SECTION 00 22 16- 6

a. Furnish a Performance Assessment Report (PAR) for each referenced contract.

A Contractor Performance Assessment Report (CPARS) may be provided in-lieu of a PAR. If an official written performance evaluation/rating was not received, so indicate. A past performance questionnaire must be sent to the reference if a written performance evaluation/rating is not included in the proposal as an attachment to the Performance Assessment Report. The Offeror(s) is also encouraged to submit any letters of appreciation or similar correspondence that the Contractor received from the Owner/Customer at the time of contract performance/completion. However, the Offeror(s) is neither required nor requested to have the Owner/Customer write such a letter for the purpose of this solicitation. The Performance Assessment Report or the Contractor Performance Assessment Report will not be included in the page count limitation. Formats for the Performance Assessment Report have been provided at the end of this Section titled: Performance Assessment Report.

b. The Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) included in the solicitation is provided for the offeror to submit to the client for each project the offeror includes in its proposal for Factor 2 for PAST PERFORMANCE where a written performance evaluation/rating is not included in the proposal as an attachment to the performance assessment report. Ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. Complete PPQ should be submitted with your proposal. If the offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the offeror should complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ, which will provide contact and client information for the respective project(s). Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government point of contract, Mr. Jimmy Barton via email at Jimmy.l.barton@usace.army.mil prior to proposal closing date. The preferred method is to include with the proposal. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs.

However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation. Also include performance recognition documents received within the last five (5) years such as awards, award fee determinations, customer letters of commendation, and any other forms of performance recognition. The Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) will not be included in the page count limitation. Formats for the Past Sample Cover Letter and Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) has been provided at the end of this Section titled: Sample Cover Letter and Performance Questionnaire (PPQ).

2. In addition to the above, the Government may review any other sources of information available for evaluating past performance. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), included Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting Systems (CPARS), using all CAGE/DUNS number of team members (partnership, joint

Nellis AFB, NV W912PL-17-R-0011

SECTION 00 22 16- 7

venture, teaming arrangement, or parent company/subsidiary/affiliate) identified in the offeror’s proposal, inquiries of owners representatives(s), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), and any other known sources not provided by the offeror. While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the Offeror.

3. In conducting the performance risk assessment, the government may use data provided by the Offeror and data obtained from other sources, including automated databases, contacting the owner or contracting officer of the project. The “References’ Past Performance/Quality Questionnaire” (Past Performance Reference Check in Section 00 22 00) is one of the means that may be used by the government to collect past performance information. The Government may contact references other than those identified by the Offeror. The Government may also take into consideration the Offerors performance of contracts with the Agency.

4. The evaluation will take into consideration the Offerors record of conformance to contract specifications and standards of good workmanship; the Offerors safety performance, the Offerors adherence to contract cost, the Offerors adherence to contract schedule, including the administrative aspects of performance; the Offerors history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, commitment to customer satisfaction, and timely award and management of subcontracts;

5. The evaluation will take into account the number and severity of problems, the demonstrated effectiveness of corrective actions taken, and the overall work record.

6. The performance record of proposed major subcontractors and proposed key personnel might also be considered.

7. “Confidential” projects cannot be submitted unless all of the information required for evaluation purposes as specified herein can nonetheless be provided to the Government as part of the Offeror(s) technical proposal. Offeror(s) that include in their proposals information that they do not want disclosed to the public for any purpose, or used by the Government except for evaluation purposes, must be clearly marked in accordance with the instructions at FAR 52.215-1, “Instructions to Offeror(s)—Competitive Acquisition”, paragraph (e), “Restriction on disclosure and use of data”.

8. Release of Subcontractor Past Performance Information. Past performance information pertaining to a proposed subcontractor cannot be disclosed to the Offeror(s) by the Government without the proposed subcontractor’s consent. Therefore, if subcontractor past performance information is being utilized by the Offeror(s), the Offeror(s) must also submit as part of its technical proposal the subcontractor’s consent to release of its past performance information by the Government to the Offeror(s). If there is a problem with the proposed subcontractor’s past performance, the prospective prime contractor can be notified, but no details can be discussed without the proposed subcontractor’s permission.

Nellis AFB, NV W912PL-17-R-0011

SECTION 00 22 16- 8

Standard of Acceptability: This standard is met when the Offeror has an overall satisfactory performance evaluation or higher, on similar contracts/completed within the past five (5) years has been demonstrated. This standard is met when the Offeror’s performance is consistently satisfactory. In the event that the Offeror does not provide a record of relevant past performance, the Offeror will receive a neutral rating on this factor.

FACTOR 4: CORPORATE MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE

Proposals will be evaluated as to the offeror’s ability to satisfy all contract requirements within its Management Plan. The Government will evaluate corporate and construction management structure, experience and qualifications of the key personnel and major subcontractors proposed for the project to include the capability to staff, manage, resource and control successful projects.

Personnel will be evaluated on their overall professional education, training and experience and on specific experience on projects of similar type, scope, and complexity to the work required under this RFP.

The Government will evaluate the management structure from start to construction-complete.

Offeror should show organizational charts, level of personnel authority of the individuals involved specifically with this project. Offeror shall identify key subcontractors and provide a brief resume demonstrating experience with this type project. Key subcontractors shall include but not be limited to excavation and grading company, paving company, testing company and electrical company.

The Government will evaluate the proposed Project Manager, Construction Site Superintendent, Grading and Paving Construction Site Superintendent/Foreman, Safety Manager, and Quality Control (QC) Manager respective qualifications, responsibilities, and authority levels. Brief resumes shall be submitted for each of these individuals. Note, it will be acceptable for the Quality Control Manager to have 10 years construction experience with at least 5 years functioning as a Quality Control Manager in lieu of the specified college education requirement.

This must be expressly shown in the CQCM resume.

The Offeror shall provide a narrative on how they plan to manage and execute this project and describes major tools or methods to accomplish this. The Offeror must demonstrate they have sufficient capacity based on on-going work load to execute this project and identify the percent of time each of the key team members will be assigned to this project.

Standard of Acceptability: The standard is met when the Offeror has demonstrated the capability to successfully staff, manage, and control the project.

FACTOR 5: SCHEDULE

Proposals will be evaluated as to the offeror’s ability to schedule the construction of the project.

Nellis AFB, NV W912PL-17-R-0011

SECTION 00 22 16- 9

Evaluation Factor: The Government will evaluate the proposed schedule to determine if the Offeror’s plan assures completion within the specified time stated in Section 00 73 00 or a shorter time proposed by the Offeror. The schedule will be evaluated to determine whether it is, complete, reasonable, realistic, and achievable. A schedule proposing less time than required in Section 00 73 00 will be considered advantageous and will become the revised contract completion time. The Schedule may be submitted on 11x 17 with each page counting as one page towards the page count. State in the narrative the total number of calendar days you have shown in your proposed schedule for project execution and acknowledge that this duration will become contractually binding should you receive the award.

This schedule shall clearly show how it compares to the number of calendar days and the sequence of construction as stated in the RFP. The schedule shall be task oriented, indicating the number of calendar days, after notice to proceed, by which milestones are to be achieved.

Give special attention to the following tasks and provide a Narrative explaining the results and methodology of the Offeror’s schedule:

(a) Show the key submittals. Include events associated with coordinating these submittals and for Government review. Government review time will be shown for the maximum duration stated in the RFP.

(b) Show the construction phase for all key activities and each major feature of construction. Show any impacts including environmental and existing site/operational constraints.

(c) Show any long lead materials and equipment.

(d) Show proposed completion date of the project and the total proposed project duration in calendar days.

(e) Fast Track design and construction is authorized for this project, but is subject to the Contracting Officer’s discretion to approve its use. A schedule based on a Fast Track process must explain how it will be used in this project and how it will affect the schedule. Fast Track may not be used as a reason to reduce Government review periods for design or construction submittal.

Standard of Acceptability: The standard is met when the Offeror has demonstrated the capability to successfully staff, manage, and control the Design-Bid-Build project.

FACTOR 6: SMALL BUSINESS UTILIZATION PLAN

Submission Requirements:

All offerors (both large and small businesses) will be evaluated on the extent of participation of small business concerns in performance of this contract opportunity.

Nellis AFB, NV W912PL-17-R-0011

SECTION 00 22 16- 10

The offeror’s Technical Proposal must demonstrate, through the Small Business Participation Plan, that the offeror will meet the minimum mandatory Total Small Business participation goal of 20% based on the total contract value (through collective small business participation from any type of small business or sub-category small business). The work to be performed directly by a small business prime offeror will also be evaluated as Small Business participation.

All offerors must complete and submit the Small Business Participation Plan form. (See at end of this section).

Standard of Acceptability: The standard is met when the Offeror has demonstrated they meet or exceed the RFP Small Business Utilization requirements.

VI. EVALUATION OF THE PRICE PROPOSAL

Price or cost to the Government will be evaluated and considered in the trade-off process but will not be scored or combined with other aspects of the evaluation. The proposed price will be analyzed for reasonableness. It may also be analyzed to determine whether it is realistic for the work to be performed; reflects a clear understanding of the requirements; and is consistent with the Offerors Technical Proposal. All offers with separately priced line items or sub line items will be analyzed for unbalanced pricing.

VII. INTENT TO AWARD WITHOUT DISCUSSION

Offerors may be given a chance to clarify certain aspects of their proposal and to resolve minor or clerical mistakes. However, offerors are not given an opportunity to respond to any identified weaknesses or deficiencies or revise their proposals.

The Government intends to evaluate proposals and issue a Contract without discussions, but reserves the right to conduct discussions and receive revised proposals if later determined to be necessary.

VIII. DISCUSSION PROCESS

The primary objective of discussions is to maximize the Government’s ability to obtain best value, based on the requirement and the evaluation factors set forth in the solicitation.

As a minimum, during discussions, the SSEB through the PCO shall indicate to, or discuss with, each offeror in the competitive range the following: (a) any adverse past performance information to which the offeror has not yet had an opportunity to respond, (b) significant weaknesses, and (c) any deficiencies that have been identified during the evaluation.

This is accomplished through the release of Evaluation Notices (ENs). All ENs shall clearly indicate the type of exchange being conducted (e.g. clarification, communication, etc). Any EN

Nellis AFB, NV W912PL-17-R-0011

SECTION 00 22 16- 11

addressing a proposal deficiency or weakness shall clearly indicate that a deficiency/weakness exists. The PCO is encouraged to discuss other aspects of the offeror’s proposal that could in the opinion of the PCO be altered or explained to enhance materially the proposal’s potential for award.

IX. FINAL PROPOSAL REVISIONS

At the conclusion of discussions, each offeror still within the competitive range shall be given an opportunity to submit a Final Proposal Revision (FPR) by a common cutoff date and time.

After receipt of the FPR, the SSEB shall complete evaluation of the FPR. The evaluation criteria from the solicitation shall continue to be the basis for evaluation.

X. DEBRIEFINGS

The PCO shall ensure offerors are debriefed, if requested, in accordance with FAR 15.505 and FAR 15.506, as applicable.

XI. PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL

The proposal submission instructions are written to give prospective contractors, where feasible, an indication of the level of detail desired by the Government. The offeror’s failure to include information that the Government has indicated should be included may result in the proposal being downgraded and/or being found deficient if inadequate detail is provided. Material omission(s) may cause the technical proposal to be rejected as unacceptable. The technical proposals will be reviewed for compliance with the technical specifications and applicable building codes and regulations. Non-compliance with the technical specifications and/or applicable building codes and/or regulations will be considered a deficiency. Proposals which are generic, vague, or lacking in detail, may be downgraded.

-END OF SECTION-

Nellis AFB, NV Amendment 0001

SECTION 00 73 00-1

SECTION 00 73 00 – SUPPLEMENTARY CONDITIONS

UNAUTHORIZED INSTRUCTIONS FROM GOVERNMENT OR OTHER PERSONNEL:

ACCRUALS:

REQUIRED INSURANCE:

WARRANTY OF CONSTRUCTION WORK

52.211-10 COMMENCEMENT, PROSECUTION, AND COMPLETION OF WORK (APR 1984) .. 5

52.211-12 LIQUIDATED DAMAGES--CONSTRUCTION (SEP 2000)

52.211-13 TIME EXTENSIONS (SEP 2000)

52.222-23 NOTICE OF REQUIREMENT FOR AFFIRMATIVE ACTION TO ENSURE EQUAL

EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY FOR CONSTRUCTION (FEB 1999)

52.225-11 BUY AMERICAN—CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS UNDER TRADE AGREEMENTS

(MAY 2014)

52.225-12 NOTICE OF BUY AMERICAN REQUIREMENT—CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS

UNDER TRADE AGREEMENTS (MAY 2014)

52.227-4 PATENT INDEMNITY—CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS (DEC 2007)

52.232-5 PAYMENTS UNDER FIXED-PRICE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS. (MAY 2014)

52.236-1 PERFORMANCE OF WORK BY THE CONTRACTOR (APR 1984)

52.236-2 DIFFERING SITE CONDITIONS (APR 1984)

52.236-4 PHYSICAL DATA (APR 1984)

52.236-13 ACCIDENT PREVENTION (NOV 1991)

ER 415-1-15 (OCT 1998) TIME EXTENSION FOR UNSUALLY SEVERE WEATHER

52.231-5000 EQUIPMENT OWNERSHIP AND OPERATING EXPENSE SCHEDULE (MAR 1995) . 21

52.236-5001 KEY PERSONNEL, SUBCONTRACTORS AND OUTSIDE ASSOCIATES OR

CONSULTANTS (MAY 2006)

52.236-5002 GOVERNMENT-FURNISHED RFP DRAWINGS, SURVEYS, AND

SPECIFICATIONS IN THE REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (JUL 2002)

52.236-5003 GOVERNMENT-FURNISHED SPECIFICATIONS AND DRAWINGS FOR

CONSTRUCTION (JUL 2003)

52.236-5009 PARTNERING (FEB 2000)

52.249-5000 BASIS FOR SETTLEMENT OF PROPOSALS

SECTION 00 73 00-2

252.227-7022 GOVERNMENT RIGHTS (UNLIMITED) (MAR 1979)

252.227-7023 DRAWINGS AND OTHER DATA TO BECOME PROPERTY OF GOVERNMENT.

(MAR 1979) 23

252.236-7000 MODIFICATION PROPOSALS - PRICE BREAKDOWN. (DEC 1991)

252.236-7001 CONTRACT DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS (AUG 2000)

252.236-7008 CONTRACT PRICES - BIDDING SCHEDULES. (DEC 1991)

SECTION 00 73 00-3

UNAUTHORIZED INSTRUCTIONS FROM GOVERNMENT OR OTHER

PERSONNEL:

Authorities/Technical Direction: The Contractor shall take no direction from any Government employee or any other person other than the Government contracting Officer that changes the terms and conditions of this contract action, the scope, or any change that impacts the cost, price, or schedule. Changes authorized by the Contracting Officer will be in the form of a written, official, signed modification to the contract action received by the Contract before the Contractor will act upon those changes. The Contract will comply with the Changes clause of this contract when the contractor believes direction has been given from persons other than the Government Contracting Office that equate to a change by notifying the Contracting Officer as directed by the clause. Any direction given by any Government employee or any other person outside their authority must be reported to the Contracting Officer. Contracting Officer Representative (CORs) are limited to the authorities stated in the COR appointment letters. If a COR is appointed under this contract, they will be appointed by written letter from the Contracting Officer to the Contractor and COR specific to this contract only. COR appointment letters from previous contract at this installation are not valid for this contract

ACCRUALS:

In accordance with USACE Engineer Financial Regulation (ER) 37-1-30, and other applicable Federal and DOD financial accounting standards, the Contractor is required to assist government personnel with providing reasonably accurate accrual estimates. The accrual is from the thru date of the period of performance (Eng Form 93, block 9) to the end for the month of the value of goods and/or services rendered/expected to be rendered to the Government pursuant to this contract. This is for each calendar month during which goods and services are delivered. Standard forms with instructions will be provided by the Government to assist with meeting this requirement. These monthly estimates, which facilitate timely entry of accruals, must be received by the Government on or before six (6) business days prior to each calendar month-end.

(End of Clause)

REQUIRED INSURANCE:

Insurance is required as follows:

a. Either Workman's Compensation or Employer's Liability Insurance with a minimum limit of $100,000.00.

b. General Liability. The Contracting Officer shall require bodily injury liability insurance coverage written on the comprehensive form or policy of at least $500,000.00 per occurrence.

c. Automobile Liability Insurance for Bodily Injury and Property Damage with minimum

SECTION 00 73 00-4

limits of $200,000.00 for injury or death of any one person; $500,000.00 for each accident or occurrence of bodily injury liability; and $20,000.00 for each accident or occurrence for property liability.

d. In every case the insurance coverage shall amount to at least the limits stated above.

However, where the Financial Responsibility Compulsory Insurance Law of the State in which the installation is located requires higher limits, the Automobile Liability Insurance Policy should provide coverage of at least those limits.

Prior to the commencement of work hereunder, the Contractor shall furnish to the Contracting Office a certificate or written statement of the above required insurance. The policies evidencing required insurance shall contain an endorsement to the effect that cancellation or any material change in the policies adversely affecting the interests of the Government in such insurance shall not be effective until 10 days after written notice thereof to the Contracting Officer.

The Contractor agrees to insert the substance of this clause, including this paragraph, in all subcontracts hereunder.