Amendment.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to:

a. Provide responses the RFIs received from interested vendors;

b. Modify "General Instructions", paragraph 2b "DURC" to "DURC or Equivalent";

c. Modify the CMR w eb site cited in "Task Order Specific Provisions", paragraph 4. The new w eb site is https://w w w .ecmra.mil/Default.aspx.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 13

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 27-Apr-2018

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W912PF18R0003

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

05-Apr-2018

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

27-Apr-2018

CODE

414TH CSB - PARC AFRICA

ATTN: ELISA MARCHETTI

UNIT 31401 BOX 33

09630 APO

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (THE)

W912PF 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W912PF18R0003

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION B - SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES

The following have been added by full text:

RFI RESPONSES

Interested Vendor Question (Fully Quoted Text) Final Government Response Is there a requirement to have a certain percentage of your labor force be local labor?

No, there is not a requirement to have a certain percentage of labor force to be local labor.

Concerning the solicitation on subject, please, could you clarify what follow: - how the Government will evaluate an offerors whose proposal does not contain the SOA OG11 and contain a SOA OG1 higher than II?

Please refer to Section M paragraph 4.1.1.3.1.:

"Offerors whose proposal does not contain at a minimum, OG 1 Classification II will receive a “Deficiency” when evaluated for this sub-factor. A higher Classification for OG 1 than the minimum may be more favorably rated with a “Strength.”

Offerors whose proposal contains OG Category 11 Classification I or higher (combined with OG 1 Classification II or higher) may be more favorably rated with a “Strength.”

Please kindly clarify the statement in Solicitation Section L - paragraph 2.2.5.1.4. Consorzio entities may participate in this solicitation. Consorzio firms may submit past experience and past performance for the firms which have performed work under their consorzio.

In particular, can a participating Consorzio submit past experience and past performance for a currently associated Consorzio firm even if such firm accomplished a "relevant" and "compliant" contract at a time when it was not yet an associated firm under the participating Consorzio?

Yes.

Construction Experience and Past Performance:

given the new SAM procedure, which is much longer and incompatible with bidding times, and the impossibility of registering new Consorzios on time, would you accept key subcontractors Experience and Past Performance, with a commitment letter.

Please refer to clause 252.204-7004 Alternate A for SAM information.

Consorzios may submit experience and past peformance for those companies which have performed work under the Consorzio.

We read the relevancy criteria. Can the requirement be met (e.g. magnitude, location in Italy, etc.) with a combination of projects, or must they all be met in each single project?

No, projects will be evaluated for recency and relevancy as individual projects, not combined.

Please refer to Section L, paragraph 2.2.4.1.2 "Construction Project Information Sheet (Attachment 3) included in this solicitation is provided for the offeror to submit for each project included for Factor I, Sub-factor 1, Construction Experience. Design Project Information Sheet (Attachment 4) included in this solicitation is provided for the offeror to submit for each project".

[I]n relation to the requested letter of guarantee, we want to know if it’s validity is referred exclusively to protect the contracting authority as regards to an incorrect presentation of the competition’s documentation, and so to support the eventual costs for the rebuilding of that same competition. Also we ask that in case of an eventual award, such a letter of guarantee should be attached/not attached to other forms of request of policies to guarantee the execution of the work. If it were attached to a guarantee for the works, what amount would be guaranteed and in what percentual?

Based on the Government's understanding of this question: the purpose of the bid bond or bid guarantee is to ensure that the offeror will not withdraw an offer within the period specified and will execute a written contract within the time specified.

FAR 28.101-2(b): "The amount shall be adequate to protect the Government from loss should the successful bidder fail to execute further contractual documents and bonds as required."

Please refer to Section H, "PERFORMANCE AND

PAYMENT BONDS - CONSTRUCTION".

We are interested to learn whether this RCO solicitation is open for German (or non-Italian) entities as well?

The solicitation is open for German (or non-Italian) entities.

Could you please advise if projects performed in Germany (or in the European Union) will be considered acceptable for the RCO Evaluation Committee.

Projects performed in Germany (or in the European Union) will not meet the criteria for "relevant and recent" under this solicitation. Please refer to Section L paragraphs 2.2.5.1.1.1. and 2.2.5.1.2.1.

AMENDMENT NOTE: The solicitation has been amended to clarify the submission of the "equivalent" of the DURC requirement for Documentation for Determination of Responsibility in Section "GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS".

It is implied that the main CEP LV panel needs to be modified to power the new equipment. Please confirm that transformers (T-4 and T-5) and feeding lines supplying CEP from substation have sufficient capacity to feed the new HVAC equipment (chiller, cooling tower, pumps, etc).

The transformers and feeding lines supplying the CEP from the substation have sufficient capacity to power the new HVAC equipment.

Note - As part of the commissioning process, the transformers will need to be tested to make sure the load is in equilibrium after modifying the electrical panels. But the transformers and electrical lines outside the CEP do not need to be replaced as part of this project.

Page 70 0f 78 of the solicitation document.

Paragraph 2.2.5.3 Factor III-Organization Paragraph

2. Joint Ventures or A.T.I. (Associazione Temporanea d'Imprese, Temporary Association of Firms) will not be allowed under this contract. Can the Government clarify whether a S.c.a r.l. (Società Consortile a Responsabilità Limitata) is allowed to bid?

Yes. SCARL legal entities may compete as offerors for this requirement

RFP/Solicitation at page 66, Section L, par. 2.2.1 states “Size of Proposal Pages: Proposal pages shall be standard letter size (8-1/2” x 11” or equivalent Italian letter size). The total pages submitted shall not exceed 80 pages. Text font and size will be Times New Roman, 12, respectively. All pages shall be numbered. Any pages over the prescribed limit will not be considered for evaluation”.

On the same page and the following one, at par.

2.2.4, there are described the 9 (nine) tabs/section composing the proposal.

Kindly clarify:

a) which of these tabs/section are to be considered in the 80 pages calculation numbering;

b) if attachments as the one mentioned in tab/section 8 and 9 are to be calculated in the 80 pages;

c) if the 80 pages are intended to be 80 single sided sheets or 80 double sided sheets.

A. All tabs are included in the 80-page count.

Please note, the Government does not consider the 78 page solicitation and amendments to count against this requirement.

B. Yes.

C. Single sided. If double-sided pages are received, each side will count as a single page.

In reference to the Evaluation Factors for Award (Section 4.1), we would like to request clarification regarding “Construction Experience” and “Design Experience.” It was our understanding from the Pre- Proposal Conference & Site Visit conducted on 18 April in Vicenza that only firms that have held contracts (i.e. done business with) the U.S.Government will be considered for award.

Solicitation Sections 4.1.1.1.1 and 4.1.1.2.1 states that “Offerors who submit Construction and Design Experience that meets these criteria (i.e. the stated minimum criteria) and were US Government funded may be more favorably rated with a “Strength.” We would like to request clarification as to whether a firm that possesses the relevant experience meeting the required criteria, but who has not yet done business with the US Government, will be considered for award?

Yes. Please refer to Section M, paragraph

4.1.1.1.1 and paragraph 4.1.1.2.1 "NOTE: Offerors who submit Construction experience that meets these criteria and were US Government funded may be more favorably rated with a "Strength."

Please note that the "SSA will use tradeoff procedures using the price evaluation and combined technical evaluations to make a subjective determination of which offeror’s proposals represent the best value to the Government" (Section M, paragraph 4.4.1.).

In reference to the required BID GUARANTEE, Solicitation Section 1, General Information,states:

Offerors will provide a bidguarantee in the amount and format as required under this section of thesolicitation (Euro 50,000.00). The offeror shall furnish a bid guaranteein the form of a firm commitment supported by a registered bank using the formatprovided at Attachment #7, Sample for Bid Guarantee. We would like toknow if it is acceptable to provide a bid guarantee in the format provided atAttachment #7 using a primary financial institution, insurance company,insurance broker, or financial

No, the offeror shall furnish a bid guarantee in the form of a firm commitment supported by a registered bank (See "General Instructions" in Solicitation).

consortium that is supported by a registeredbank?

In reference to the seed project, can the government please provide the electrical diagrams of the existing pumps (PCHP 1-2-3, SCHP 1-2-3 and Pumps n.CWP1-2-3-4) and the electrical diagrams of the connection of the three cooling towers existing.

See attached documents for electrical as-built drawings. Drawings provided: EP401, EP404, EP414. As-built electrical panel diagrams provided:

QMT-COG - CEP medium voltage, QGBT-C1 -main low voltage, QE-1, QGE-CT, and QGE-CT bis.

The RFP indicates our proposal should be in 12 point type font. Does this font size requirement apply to text in headers and footers, and graphics including tables and charts?

Yes.

Should all Factors be combined into one volume/one binder/one electronic file for submittal?

Refer to paragraph 2.2.4.

In reference to the Evaluation Factors for Award (Section 4.1.1.3.1), we would like to request clarification regarding the required SOA Certifications. Solicitation Section 4.1.1.3.1 states that offerers shall submit certifications for current SOA categories: OG1 and OG11. However, the evaluation factor further states that: “Offeror who’s proposal does not contain at a minimum, OG1 Classification II will receive a “Deficiency” when evaluated for this sub-factor. A higher Classification for OG1 than the minimum may be more favorably rated with a “Strength.” Offerers whose proposal contains OG Category 11 Classification I or higher (combined with OG1 Classification II or higher) may be more favorably rated with a “strength.” Any other OG Categories submitted will not be evaluated. After reading this evaluation factor, it is unclear whether the SOA certification OG11 is an absolute minimum requirement or whether having this certification provides for a more favorable rating. Question: Is the SOA certification OG11 an absolute minimum requirement for a firm to be considered for award or is only the SOA certification OG1 required and having the OG11 certification results in a more favorable rating?

Please refer to Section M, paragraph 4.1.1.3.1.

and evaluation definitions at paragraph 5.2 of the solicitaiton. Offerors who do not submit a SOA OG1 classification II at a minimum, will receive a "deficiency." A deficiency is defined as, "A material failure of a proposal to meet a Government requirement or a combination of significant weaknesses in a proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level. See FAR 15.001"

Offerors who submit SOA OG1 classification II or higher may be more favorably rated with a "Strength". Offerors who submit SOA OG11 with classifications I or higher (combined with OG1 classification II or higher) may be more favorably rated with a "Strength."

In reference to the required cost proposal breakdown to be prepared in response to the subject solicitation, we would like to request a copy of the detailed cost estimate quantities (computo metrico) for the proposed seed project to be used for our detailed price quotation.

The quantities are determined by the contractor for design-build projects. For the K and L breakdown:

All quantities are "K" except for D3030 New Water Chiller and New Cooling Tower line items. For these two items, the "K" percentage should be the costs for installing a 1 MW chiller and cooling tower. The "L" percentage should be the difference in cost between a 3 MW chiller and 1 MW chiller.

In reference to the design and technical specifications, it cannot be ascertained if on the QGBT/C1 Electrical Panel, powered by the two T4 and T5 traps, that we believe to work in parallel with the indicated short-circuit current of 55 kA, if it is possible on this Panel to feed the new chillers and if the sub-panels QGE-CT and QGE-CTBIS are able to withstand the additional electrical load of the pumps and cooling tower? Overall, there would be a required power increase of 662.8 kW. Page 22, Part 3 of the specifications indicate that the electrical panel must be modified to power the new chiller (D5010). The question is whether the current framework is able to withstand the required increase in electrical power demand? Please advise as to whether the existing electrical panel and sub panels can support the increases in electrical demand.

See attached document for electrical as-built drawings. Spare switches were left for the pumps and cooling towers. The additional electrical load was foreseen in the original design of the CEP, so the transformers and feeding lines supplying the CEP have sufficient capacity to power the new equipment.

With regard to the required chemical treatments of condensed water, the technical specifications indicate that the chemical treatments will be adjusted, if necessary. Specification Section D3040 Pag. 22, Part 3 indicates that the physical chemical limits of the water in the circulation, but there is no indication of the sizing of the current water treatment systems.

We request information regarding the current water treatment system, and if, and in what capacity, they will need to be integrated for the required chemical treatments?

See attached document for existing condenser water treatment equipment named, "Condenser_Water_Treatment_Existing_Equipme nt".

Our bank is currently processing the Bid Guarantee for the solicitation. As the Bid Guarantee makes reference to a Performance Bond, the bank would need the text of that document as well for their internal compliance process. Could you please publish the text of the Performance Bond that will be required from the awardee firms, as that is part of the solicitation package requirements.

No text of the performance bond will be provided.

Refer to Section H "PERFORMANCE AND

PAYMENT BONDS - CONSTRUCTION"

Due to the necessary time to obtain some of the requested mandatory Administrative documents, and the Closure of some Departments/Offices due to Italian Holidays (April 25 and May 01 and the related bridge days), this is to kindly request a postponement of the BID cut-off date, of at least one week

No extension to the solicitation due date will be given at this time.

As also requested during the Site Visit, the Bank that will issue the Guarantee needs to know, to exactly calculate the cost and duration of the Bid Guarantee, a due date for the expiring of such Guarantee.

Please confirm via Amendment what you already stated, “that the award will be made by the 31st July 2018”. At this date will be added, by us, other thirty days (might be less but the period falls under summer holidays) that will be needed to the successful offeror for the execution of all contractual documents.

The government intends to award base MATOC awards and a seed project by 31 July 2018.

We think that there are some incongruence between schedules and drawings. One for example:

In the schedule for the Cooling Tower, on drawing M701N, it is proposed a Capacity with a (DELTA)T=35°-30°=5°C and a Flow Qc=155l/s. With this data the total Capacity of the Cooling Tower should be 3.244 kW and not 3.000 kW as stated.

Furthermore if we look at drawing MP603N, it is clearly stated that the Cooling Tower has to have a Flow equal to 166,4 l/s that, if correctly calculated, should have a Total Capacity of 3.482 kW. As you can see this data are a little bit confusing. Please confirm which is correct.

Disregard the flow rate of 168.4 L/s for the new cooling tower on drawing MP603N; this flow rate was listed in error. The capacities and flow rates on M701N are approximate based on manufacturer's information for the equipment used in the concept design. Paragraph D3030 of Part 3 of the scope of work lists the minimum chiller and cooling tower capacities. The actual capacities and flow rates shall be determined by the Contractor, based on equipment selected.

As part of the project we have to build an expansion to the QGBT/C1 to install a new switchgear that will supply the new Chiller, we request the as-built drawings of the existing Power Center, Front Drawing and Schematic.

See attached documents for electrical as-built drawings: QMT-COG medium voltage, QGBT-C1 -main low voltage, QE-1, QGE-CT, and QGE-CT bis

We kindly request if we could receive Attachment#2 “Bid Schedule” in Excel format.

This document is provided on FBO in Excel format.

The following have been modified:

GENERAL INFORMATION

1. DESCRIPTION OF WORK

a. The work includes, but is not limited to, providing zero to 100 percent design effort, reproduction, labor, transportation, materials, equipment, and supervision necessary to accomplish various maintenance, repairs, alterations, construction, demolition, and associated incidental environmental work (including but not limited to UXO and debris removal, asbestos, lead-based paint, mold, heavy metals, site contamination, etc.) to U.S.

Government facilities in Italy, by means of this Multiple Award Task Order Contract (MATOC).

b. Task Orders shall be issued by the Contracting Officer as either a Design-Bid-Build (DBB) or as a Design-

Build (DB).

2. CONTRACT PERIOD

Each contract consists of a base period of 12 months from the award date of the contract, and four (4) 12-month option periods.

3. CONTRACT CAPACITY

The maximum amount the Government will order under all contracts is $49,000,000 as a shared capacity.

4. CONTRACT MAXIMUM AND MINIMUM ORDERING

Refer to clause 52.216-19.

5. TASK ORDER AWARD

Specific instructions for submission criteria and evaluation of individual Task Orders will be provided in each Task Order Request for Proposal(s). When evaluation factors other than proposed price are used as the basis for award, the Contracting Officer may review the Contractor's proposal and may revise the project scope and/or negotiate with the Contractor.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION: All requests for information regarding the solicitation, drawings, specifications, etc., must be submitted to the Government point of contact (Ms. Elisa Marchetti at elisa.marchetti2.ln@mail.mil and Mr. Shaun McAfee at shaun.a.mcafee.civ@mail.mil) by 24 April 2018, 13:30 (Central Europe).

Offerors shall include the following documentation with their proposal:

1. BID GUARANTEE: Offerors will provide a bid guarantee in the amount and format as required under this section of the solicitation (Euro 50,000.00). The offeror shall furnish a bid guarantee in the form of a firm commitment supported by a registered bank using the format provided as Attachment #7, Sample for Bid Guarantee. The Contracting Officer will return bid guarantees:

a. To unsuccessful offerors as soon as practicable after the award of the contract; and

b. To the successful offeror upon execution of all contractual documents and bonds (including any necessary coinsurance or reinsurance agreements), as required by the proposal as accepted.

Failure to submit a valid Bid Guarantee will result in an incomplete proposal which will not be evaluated.

2. DOCUMENTATION FOR DETERMINATION OF RESPONSIBILITY (Volume 2--see Section L). The Government will make an affirmative Determination of Responsibility in accordance with FAR 9.1. The following documents shall be provided to assist in this determination.

a. CERTIFICATE OF CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: Offerors shall provide a copy of the Chamber of Commerce Certificate of Membership (Certificato di Iscrizione alla Camera di Commercio) that is NOT older than six (6) months at the time set forth for the receipt of the offers. The Anti-Mafia Self Certification shall be provided with the Chamber of Commerce Certification. Offerors will use Attachment #6 as an example.

b. DURC or Equivalent: Offerors shall provide a copy of the Documento Unico di Regolarita’ Contributiva

(DURC) that is not older than ninety (90) days at the time set forth for the receipt of the offers. Self-certifications (autocertificazioni) are not allowed. The document must include the following statement: “Con il presente documento si dichiara che l’impresa RISULTA REGOLARE ai fini del DURC” (We hereby declare that the firm IS IN COMPLIANCE with the DURC requirements). A document equivalent to DURC will be accepted only from non-Italian vendors.

c. ESTABLISHMENT OF A POOL OF FIRMS (CONSORZIO): a certified copy (copia autenticata) of the notarized legal document that established the Pool of Firms (Consorzio) and names and addresses of the associated firms proposed to perform the work.

3. PROPOSED DESIGN SUB-CONTRACTOR: Offerors who intend to use a sub-contractor(s) for design work under this contract and/or for the seed project included in this solicitation should provide the company name, address, and point(s) of contact for the proposed sub-contractor. This submission information should be clearly marked and completed on a separate page within the proposal.

SEED PROJECT PROPOSAL SCHEDULE

SEED PROJECT PROPOSAL SCHEDULE

Project # HB-47096-7J Add a New Chiller and Cooling Tower to Central Energy Plant, Bldg. 55

Caserma Del Din, Vicenza, Italy

Item No. Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Price

0001 Construction 1 Job - € ____________________________

0002 Design 1 Job - € ____________________________

0003 CMR 1 Job - € ____________________________

TOTAL (ITEMS 0001 THRU 0003) € ____________________________

Notes for Seed Project Proposal Schedule

1. Seed Project Proposal Schedule may be unable to determine total evaluated pricing or price fair and reasonability. Failure to submit pricing on all CLINs and the Seed Project Schedule may not be evaluated and can lead to contract award ineligibility.

2. All offerors must include Bid Schedule Attachment #2.

3. Offerors are required to complete pricing for Contractor Manpower Reporting (CMR). See "Task Order Specific Provisions" for more information on this reporting requirement.

TASK ORDER SPECIFIC PROVISIONS

TASK ORDER SPECIFIC PROVISIONS

1. GENERAL. All applicable provisions set-forth in the contract shall apply to this task order, except as supplemented by this section. The following revisions and/or requirements apply only to this specific task order.

2. TYPE OF TASK ORDER. The Government contemplates the issuance of a firm-fixed-price Design-Build (D-B) construction task order as a result of this Request For Proposal (RFP).

3. MAGNITUDE OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT. The estimated price range of this work is between €1,000,000 and €5,000,000 [FAR 36.204].

4. CONTRACTOR MANPOWER REPORTING. The Contractor Manpower Reporting (CMR) system is a business process to collect information on funding source, contracting vehicle, organization supported, mission and function performed, and labor hours and costs for contracted efforts.

Contractors report actual labor hours, dollars, and other information from their accounting systems directly into this system, or through their Army Requiring Activity, using their existing timekeeping, personnel, and accounting systems as well as information supplied with the contract CMR data must be accurate and complete and entered into CMR during the data gathering period of 1 October through October 31 for every year, or part of a year, for which the contract is in force. The Contractor can get information about entering data into the web site:

https://www.ecmra.mil/Default.aspx.

5. SECTION I –CONTRACT CLAUSES. All applicable clauses in Section I of the basic MATOC apply to the task order except as revised in this section.

a. 52.211-10 COMMENCEMENT, PROSECUTION, AND COMPLETION OF WORK (APR 1984)

The Contractor shall be required to (a) commence work under this contract within 15 calendar days after the date the Contractor receives the notice to proceed, (b) prosecute the work diligently, and (c) complete the entire work ready for use as stated below:

Performance schedule for projects HB-47096-7J is 373 calendar days split as follows:

163 calendar days to perform the design, to include 14 calendar days for DPW to review the project;

196 calendar days to perform the construction.

The time stated for completion shall include final cleanup of the premises.

(End of clause)

b. 52.211-12 LIQUIDATED DAMAGES--CONSTRUCTION (SEP 2000)

(a) If the Contractor fails to complete the work within the time specified in the contract, the Contractor shall pay liquidated damages to the Government in the amount of €187,67 ($201.17) for each calendar day;

(b) If the Government terminates the Contractor's right to proceed, liquidated damages will continue to accrue until the work is completed. These liquidated damages are in addition to excess costs of repurchase under the Termination clause.

c. 52.236-27 ALT I Site Visit (Construction) (FEB 1995)

(a) The clauses at 52.236-2, Differing Site Conditions, and 52.236-3, Site Investigations and Conditions Affecting the Work, will be included in any contract awarded as a result of this solicitation. Accordingly, offerors are urged and expected to inspect the site where the work will be performed.

(b) An organized site visit has been scheduled for --

18 April 2018, 13:30

(c) Participants will meet at --

The entrance gate no later than 13:30, Caserma Del Din, Vicenza, Italy .

(End of provision)

d. 252.232-7006 WIDE AREA WORKFLOW PAYMENT INSTRUCTIONS (MAY 2013)

(a) Definitions. As used in this clause—

“Department of Defense Activity Address Code (DoDAAC)” is a six position code that uniquely identifies a unit, activity, or organization.

“Document type” means the type of payment request or receiving report available for creation in Wide Area WorkFlow (WAWF).

“Local processing office (LPO)” is the office responsible for payment certification when payment certification is done external to the entitlement system.

(b) Electronic invoicing. The WAWF system is the method to electronically process vendor payment requests and receiving reports, as authorized by DFARS 252.232-7003, Electronic Submission of Payment Requests and Receiving Reports.

(c) WAWF access. To access WAWF, the Contractor shall—

(1) Have a designated electronic business point of contact in the System for Award Management at https://www.acquisition.gov; and

(2) Be registered to use WAWF at https://wawf.eb.mil/ following the step-by-step procedures for self-registration available at this web site.

(d) WAWF training. The Contractor should follow the training instructions of the WAWF Web-Based Training Course and use the Practice Training Site before submitting payment requests through WAWF.

Both can be accessed by selecting the “Web-Based Training” link on the WAWF home page at https://wawf.eb.mil/

(e) WAWF methods of document submission. Document submissions may be via web entry, Electronic Data Interchange, or File Transfer Protocol.

(f) WAWF payment instructions. The Contractor must use the following information when submitting payment requests and receiving reports in WAWF for this contract/order:

(1) Document type. The Contractor shall use the following document type:

Construction Payment Invoice

(2) Inspection/acceptance location. The Contractor shall select the following inspection/acceptance location(s) in WAWF, as specified by the contracting officer.

W582RR

(3) Document routing. The Contractor shall use the information in the Routing Data Table below only to fill in applicable fields in WAWF when creating payment requests and receiving reports in the system.

Routing Data Table*

Field Name in WAWF Data to be entered in WAWF

Pay Official DoDAAC W56FJW

Issue By DoDAAC W912PF

Admin DoDAAC W912PF

Inspect By DoDAAC W582RR

Ship To Code W582RR

Ship From Code N/A

Mark For Code W582RR

Service Approver (DoDAAC) W582RR

Service Acceptor (DoDAAC) W582RR

Accept at Other DoDAAC N/A

LPO DoDAAC N/A

DCAA Auditor DoDAAC N/A

Other DoDAAC(s) N/A

(4) Payment request and supporting documentation. The Contractor shall ensure a payment request includes appropriate contract line item and subline item descriptions of the work performed or supplies delivered, unit price/cost per unit, fee (if applicable), and all relevant back-up documentation, as defined in DFARS Appendix F, (e.g. timesheets) in support of each payment request.

(5) WAWF email notifications. The Contractor shall enter the e-mail address identified below in the “Send Additional Email Notifications” field of WAWF once a document is submitted in the system.

Elisa Marchetti: elisa.marchetti2.ln@mail.mil

(g) WAWF point of contact.

(1) The Contractor may obtain clarification regarding invoicing in WAWF from the following contracting activity’s WAWF point of contact.

USARMY.VICENZA.266-FMC.MBX.266FMC-IFO-CVS-WAWF-OFFICIAL@mail.mil

(2) For technical WAWF help, contact the WAWF helpdesk at 866-618-5988.

e. SUBMITTAL AND RECEIPT OF INVOICES

(1) All requests for progress or final payment shall:

(a) Address the following substantiation:

(i) An itemization of the amounts requested, related to the various elements of work required by the contract covered by the payment requested.

(ii) A listing of the amount included for work performed by each subcontractor under the contract.

(iii) A listing of the total amount of each subcontract under the contract.

(iv) A listing of the amounts previously paid to each subcontractor under the contract.

(v) Proof of subcontractors payment (“fatture quietanzate”).

vi) For final payment, the Contractor shall submit a statement signed by each subcontractor (manleva) stating that the have been paid except for remianing amount which will be satisfied when the Contractor receives final payment (amount to be specified)

(b) Be supported by a COPY CERTIFIED (COPIA AUTENTICATA) and NOT older than ninety (90) days at the time of the request for payment of the Contractor’s DURC (Documento Unico di Regolarità Contributiva). Self certifications (autocertificazioni) are NOT allowed. The document MUST include the following statement: “Con il presente documento si dichiara che l’impresa RISULTA REGOLARE ai fini del DURC”.

(c) Include the certification required by FAR clause 52.232-5 -- Payments under Fixed-Price Construction Contracts. If the Contracting Officer determines that the certification is inaccurate in any material respect, the Contracting Officer will initiate administrative or other remedial action and may refer the matter to the agency official responsible for investigating fraud.

(2) The Contractor is responsible for returning installation passes to the issuing Installation Access Control Office (IACO) or to the COR when the contract is completed or when a Contractor employee no longer requires access or final payment shall not be made.

(3) Offeror should include the payment address in the proposal, if it is different from that shown for the offeror.

(End of Summary of Changes)