A02AppendixD1D2D4Standardtest.pdf
PDF 186 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Rock, Stone, Sand and Clay for Carlyle Lake
- Solicitation number
- W912P918B0014
About this file
Appendix
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| B01.BIDSUMMARYSHEET..pdf | ||
| A02AppendixEMVSStoneSourceList.pdf | ||
| A22W912P918B0014.pdf | ||
| A02RockAppendixA1.pdf | ||
| A02AppendixC..pdf | ||
| A02AppendixBwithRedboundary.pdf | ||
| A02RockAppendix_A.PDF | ||
| A02RockAppendixA2.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
3765D
STANDARD TEST FOR GRADATION OF RIPRAP
A. Select a representative sample (Note No.1), weigh and dump on hard stand.
B. Select specific sizes (see example) on which to run “individual weight larger than” test. (See Note No. 2). Procedure is similar to the standard aggregate gradation test for “individual weight retained.”
C. Determine the largest size stone in the sample. (100 percent size)
D. Separate by “size larger than” the selected weights, starting with the larger sizes. Use reference stones, with identified weights, for visual comparison in separating the obviously “larger than” stones. Stones that appear close to the specific weight must be individually weighed to determine size grouping. Weigh each size group, either individually or cumulatively.
E. Paragraph d above will result in “individual weight retained” figures. Calculate individual percent retained (heavier than), cumulative percent retained, and cumulative percent passing (lighter than). Plot percent passing, along with the specification curve on Eng Form 4055.
Notes
1. Sample Selection. The most important part of the test and least precise is the selection of a representative sample. NO “standard” can be devised; larger quarry run stone is best sampled at the shot or muck pile by given direction to the loader; small graded riprap is best sampled by random selection from the transporting vehicles. If possible, all parties should take part in the sample selection, and agree before the sample is run, that the sample is representative.
2. Selection of Size for Separation. It is quite possible and accurate to run a gradation using any convenient sizes for the separation, without reference to the specifications.
After the test is plotted on a curve, the gradation limits may be plotted. Overlapping gradation with this method are no problem. It is usually more convenient, however, to select points form the gradation limits, such as the minimum 50 percent size, the minimum 15 percent size, and one or tow others, as separation points.
Example Gradation
Specifications
Stone Weight in Lbs Percent Finer by Weight
400-160 100 160-80 5
APPENDIX D-1
Example Worksheet
Cumulative Cumulative Stone Size Individual Individual Percent Percent Lbs Wt Retained Percent Retained Retained Passing
400 0 0 - 100
160 9,600 30 30 70
80 11,200 35 65 35
20 8,000 25 90 10
30 3,200 10 100 - 32,000Lbs
NOTE:
Largest stone 251 lbs
APPENDIX D-2
GRADATION TEST DATA SHEET
Sample No. 1 ________________________
Type of
Quarry___________________________ Stone Tested ________________________
Date of Test_______________________ Testing Rate ____________________Tons
Contractor________________________ Location ____________________________
TEST REPRESENTS
Contract No. District Tons
TOTAL
GRADATION
Stone Size Weight Individual Cumulative Specification (lbs) Retained % Retained % Ret. % Pass % Finer by wt
Total Weight
Remarks________________________________________________________________
I certify that the above sample is representative of the total tonnage covered by this test report
Contractor Representative______________________________________________________
Government Representative_____________________________________________________
APPENDIX D-3
File details come from the government source that posted it.