Enclosure 2 - POST DIVE SURVEY .pdf

Post-Dive Survey; 26 July 2012

POST DIVE SURVEY

U.S. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT, NEW ORLEANS

Contract No: W912P8- Contractor: Specialty Diving

Location: Task Order #:

Survey Ratings By: Date:

Dive Supervisor:

Rating “E” for Exceptional; “G” for Very Good; “S” for Satisfactory; “M” for Marginal;

“U” for Unsatisfactory; “N/A” for Not Applicable. See next page for rating description.

R A T I N G

C O M M E N T S

GENERAL DIVE PERFORMANCE

1. Did the Contractor arrive at the designated location at the specified time?

2. Upon arrival at job site did Contractor have the required personnel, administrative paperwork (Safety Manual, Dive Plan, Dive Log, etc.), and equipment necessary to perform the dive in accordance to US Amy Corps of Engineers Safety and Health Requirements Manual (EM 385-1-1)?

3. Did Contractor carry out all Administrative and Equipment checks in a thorough and timely manner?

4. Was the Contractor able to perform the dive and accomplish the work required in a thorough and timely manner?

5. Upon Completion of the dive did Contractor perform all the required Equipment checks, and prepare all the necessary Administrative paperwork to document the dive?

6. Was Contractor’s overall performance on the job acceptable, having met all requirements found in Safety and Health Requirements Manual (EM 385-1-1)?

Comments:

Post-Dive Survey; 26 July 2012

Comments to Designated Dive Coordinator:

Rating “E” for Exceptional – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Rating “G” for Very Good – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Rating “S” for Satisfactory – Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Rating “M” for Marginal – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Rating “U” for Unsatisfactory – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective action appear or were ineffective.

Rating “N/A” for Not Applicable – was not required to perform in this area.