W912P824B0054 AM0001.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The subject solicitation for USACE - New Orleans District United States Dredge Wheeler Drydocking and Repairs, Louisiana, is hereby amended as follows:

1) Provide Government Responses to prospective Bidders' questions. See attached continuation pages.

2) To re-open the opportunity for Bidders to submit follow -up questions. The deadline for the submission of questions is 10:00 AM local time, Friday, August 9, 2024. Another amendment w ill be forthcoming providing Government responses to the supplemental questions.

3) The response date for this Invitation for Bid remains unchanged, 10:00 AM local time, Friday, August 23, 2024.

***PLEASE ACKNOWLEDGE THIS AMENDMENT AND SUBMIT WITH YOUR BID***

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 11

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 02-Aug-2024

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street , County, State and Zip Code) X W912P824B0054

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

19-Jul-2024

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

02-Aug-2024

CODE

CONTRACTING DIV- CHIEF

7400 LEAKE AVENUE, ROOM 172

NEW ORLEANS LA 70118-3651

W912P8 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W912P824B0054

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

The following have been added by full text:

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Question 1: What drawing format does the USACE provide? Will the Contractor be responsible for recreating drawings in CAD to produce the “as-built” drawings specified in Section C, Part 1, GN-4?

Answer 1: USACE-provided drawings will be in PDF format. “As-built” drawings can be red-lined (hand-drawn) or created with CAD.

Question 2: Will there be any additional Services required beyond Contract specifications in Section H-4 due to the disconnection of the switchgear?

Answer 2: The additional services for the switchgear are defined in its scope of work.

Question 3: Will you accept different subcontractors than what is called out on the solicitation if they offer the same OEM repair services?

Answer 3: The Contractor may submit an alternative subcontractor to USACE for consideration.

Question 4: Will the Contractor schedule ABS during the drydocking and repairs?

Answer 4: USACE will pay for ABS services through a separate contract. However, USACE would prefer if the shipyard will send callout and schedule ABS to expedite inspections.

Question 5: Can USACE clarify the RFP process and commit to a timeline to respond with a Notice to Proceed?

Answer 5: An acceptable process for both parties will be established after award. An example of the process follows. A Request for Proposal will be submitted to the Contractor by the Contracting Officer Representative. Once the time and cost proposal is submitted to the COR, it will be evaluated. Review of cost, proposed schedule delays and the necessary agency approvals from ABS and USCG are all part of the technical analysis process, prior to USACE acceptance. Upon completion, the proposal will be accepted, negotiated, or cancelled. Due to the varying complexity of the technical analysis of each proposal, USACE will not define a response time to be applied to all RFPs. USACE is heavily embedded in the process and committed to timely responses.

Question 6: Can USACE provide wind and seismic requirements to help the shipyard prepare for adverse weather conditions?

Answer 6: USACE does not possess wind and seismic documentation for the ship. The shipyard must prepare for adverse weather in accordance with item DD-1.

Question 7: Will USACE please clarify the process and timeline for the blocking plan submission by the Contractor?

Answer 7: The blocking plan and blocking loading calculation should be provided to USACE after contract award and at least 48 hours prior to the ship entering drydock. USACE will provide liquid report within the forementioned timeframe.

Question 8: Will USACE provide liquid load reports prior to drydocking for Docking Plan calculations and for replenishing of fluids prior to undocking?

Answer 8: Yes. Liquid load report will be provided.

Question 9: Can the new emergency switchboard panel be rotated to fit through the doorway without cutting the hull?

Question 9: Yes, the subcontractor that designed the new emergency switchboard has assured that it can fit through the doorway.

Question 10: Where do the cables leading to the emergency switchgear penetrate from? Can we pull the cables back if needed during removal/installation?

Answer 10: The cables from the emergency switchboard penetrate the forward bulkhead and enter the port side of the fan room on the poop deck. The cables can be pulled back into the fan room.

Question 11: What is the pressure inside of the steering gear pumps?

Answer 11: The operating pressure is 397 PSI, with system relief valve setting at 750 PSI.

Question 12: For steel replacement items, many specify beveling both sides of the plating and welding from both sides. Instead of beveling and welding both sides of the plating, can the contractor use a ceramic backing?

Answer 12: The contractor must submit the ABS approved welding procedure to USACE for review before accepting.

Question 13: What is the estimated dimensions of the hopper slope plating along center well bulkhead being replaced?

Answer 13: Estimate 320 square feet.

Question 14: What is the estimated square footage of the doubler along the centerwell.

Answer 14: Estimate 1000 square feet.

Question 15: Under paragraph F-7 sub-paragraph b it calls out the qualifications test of the ABS or the U.S. Navy

Department, will qualifications under MARMC be accepted as a substitute for U.S. Navy Department?

Will qualifications held under NAVSEA S9074-AQ-GIB-010/248 be acceptable for this project? Please provide which if any USCG requirements for welding certifications will be needed for welding.

Answer 15: Since all structural, pipe, steel weldings on the Dredge Wheeler shall be inspected (as specify in INSPECTION POINT in the solicitation) and approved by local ABS and USCG inspectors and their local/regional offices, the government (Corps of Engineers) shall accept any welding procedures and specifications that are recognized, accepted, and approved by local or regional ABS offices and USCG offices and their respective inspectors.

Question 16: During the ship-check occurring on 2-16-24, it was observed the dredge and sludge tank areas contained heavy amounts of dredged material from a previous mission. Since environmental laws can differ between states, can the ship’s crew open the seaward accesses while underway to the repair facility in order flush out as much sludge as possible within those areas?

Answer 16: The government shall open all hopper doors prior to entering the contractor facility to clear out majority of mud and materials from previous mission. However, a lot of mud shall be collected on the beams, stringers, and other steel structures in the hopper, which require a proper wash down with fire hose. The contractor shall perform the wash down of any mud, materials in the hopper per section DD-1 in the solicitation. To the best knowledge of the Corps of Engineers, there is no hazardous materials in the hopper or on the ship.

Question 17: For specification item 0080 MD-2 – WI Second Paragraph in looking at Reference 70006-2725-005 the five numbered pieces 106, 108, 111, 115, 117 to renew are in No.5 Port Void.

Answer 17: These pipes are located in No. 5 Port Void.

Question 18: For specification item 0080 MD-2 – Fourth Paragraph, First Sentence, “The contractor shall then remove pipes 106, 108, 111, 115, 117 and the two Y-pipes 109H & 109I.” Are pipes 109H & 109I just to be removed as interferences or are they to be renewed? If they are to be renewed are they GFM?

Please advise.

Answer 18: Y-Pipes 109H & 109I to be removed as interferences. These two pipes shall not be renewed and shall be re-installed.

Question 19: For specification item 0080 MD-2 – Reference drawing 70006-2725-005. Pipe Piece numbers 106 &

108. The pipe lengths are not legible. Please provide the pipe overall lengths for both pieces.

Answer 19: Drawing 70006-2725-005 and 70006-2725-008 are attached for reference only. The length for pipe No

106 is approximately 8.5 ft; the length for pipe No. 108 is approximately 11 ft. However, the contractor MUST field measure old pipes and/or jig old pipes to fabricate new pipes to ensure accuracies of pipe length.

Question 20: For specification 99 LW-1 – Is the STBD main engine being removed from the vessel or worked in place?

Answer 20: The starboard main engine shall be removed from the launch and transport to a machine shop. The contractor shall have option to ship engine to suggested subcontractor’s shop or work at contractor facility under the supervision of suggested subcontractor.

Question 21: For specification 0006-0018 – Reference drawing 7006-4013-902 states in the notes that the doors need to be heat treated after welding. Is it the intent to have each repair subjected to the heat treating?

Answer 21: There is no need for heat treating after repair.

Question 22: For specification 0006-0018 – WI 0008 DD-6.2 calls for 10 plates to be addressed but states 1 plate per door, one with center seal and one without center seal. Please clarify how many plates of each is to be addressed. Is it 10 total plates, 10 with the seal and ten without or five of each?

Answer 22: For bidding purpose, estimate (5) doors without center seal and (5) doors with center seal.

Question 23: For specification 0006-0018 – WI 0009 DD-6.3 calls for the 1-3/4” plate to be renewed IAW 7006 –

4013 – 902. Provide a detail that shows the referenced plate and installation location.

Answer 23: Plate thickness 1-3/4” is shown on drawing 70006-4013-902, Rev F & G.

Location of doors to be worked on will be determined at drydock by visual inspection.

Question 24: For specification 0006-0018 – WI 0009 DD-6.3 section B – B of DWG 7006 – 4013 – 902 has a reference to Detail “D”. Please indicate where on the drawing Detail “ D” can be found and is this the detail required for the renewal of the 1-3/4” plate?

Answer 24: Detail D is on upper right corner of dwg 70006-4013-902. All dimensions are shown on drawing 70006-4013-902, rev G & F.

Question 25: Please confirm that coatings can be applied via brush and roll (where needed and deemed appropriate) if the proper dry film thickness is achieved.

Answer 25: Yes, brush and roll can be used where needed and deemed appropriate.

Question 26: For specification 058-HH-20.3.2 – What is the total amount of surface area (in square feet) for this item?

Answer 26: The government does not provide total surface area. The contractor shall estimate using referenced drawings.

Question 27: For specification 058-HH-20.3.2 – The Item directs spot blasting, but no percentage of the area or square footage was provided. Please provide an amount of area.

Answer 27: An estimate total area of 20,000 square feet, mainly at the flat bottom of the ship, shall be spot blasted.

Question 28: For specification 058-HH-20.3.2 – We are to spray the entire area with cleaner (GMA 571) and then pressure wash. At what pressure should we allow for (3,000 PSI or 5,000 PSI)?

Answer 28: Pressure wash pressure can be used up to 5000 PSI.

Question 29: For specification 058-HH-20.3.3 – What is the total amount of surface area (in square feet) for this item?

Answer 29: The government does not provide total surface area. The contractor shall estimate using referenced drawings.

Question 30: For specification 058-HH-20.3.3 – The Item directs spot blasting, but no percentage of the area or square footage was provided. Please provide an amount of area.

Answer 30: An estimate total area of 5,000 square feet shall be spot blasted.

Question 31: For specification 058-HH-20.3.3 – We are to spray the entire area with cleaner (GMA 571) and then pressure wash. At what pressure should we allow for (3,000 PSI or 5,000 PSI)?

Answer 31: Pressure wash pressure can be used up to 5000 PSI.

Question 32: For specification 058-HH-20.3.4 – What is the total amount of surface area (in square feet) for this item?

Answer 32: The government does not provide total surface area. The contractor shall estimate using referenced drawings.

Question 33: For specification 058-HH-20.3.4 – The Item directs spot blasting, but no percentage of the area or square footage was provided. Please provide an amount of area.

Answer 33: An estimate total area of 5,000 square feet shall be spot blasted

Question 34: For specification 058-HH-20.3.4 – We are to spray the entire area with cleaner (GMA 571) and then pressure wash. At what pressure should we allow for (3,000 PSI or 5,000 PSI)?

Answer 34: Pressure wash pressure can be used up to 5000 PSI.

Question 35: For specification 058-HH-20.4.1 – During the washing process would there be any existing mud / muck that would require removal? If so, how much (in M3 or tons) Answer 35: For bidding purpose, estimate 2 cubic yard of mud.

Question 36: For specification 058-HH-20.4.1 – What is the amount of surface area in the chain lockers (in square feet) to be cleaned and coated?

Answer 36: Estimate 950 square feet total.

Question 37: For specification 058-HH-20.4.1 – Due to the safety hazards of UHP water blasting inside of tightly confined spaces, could the contractor utilize grit blasting to an SP-7 (which is the equivalent to a WJ-4) in this space? Or could hand tools (SP-2) and power tools (SP-3) be used?

Answer 37: Yes, the contractor can use grit blasting and hand/power tools. If grit blasting is used, the contractor shall contain all grit, sand in a closed system so that these materials shall not be exposed to open air and potentially contaminate all equipment and adjacent spaces.

Question 38: For specification 058-HH-20.4.2 – Due to the hazards of UHP water blasting inside of tanks, could the contractor utilize grit blasting to an SP-6 (which is the equivalent to a WJ-3) in these tanks? Or could power tools (SP-3) be used?

Answer 38: No, grit blasting is not allowed in potable water tanks due to the possibility of grit/sand to be remained in the tanks, which poses health hazard to the potable water system and the crew. The potable water tanks are large enough for water blasting methods, which have been used in all previous drydocks.

Question 39: For specification 058-HH-20.4.2 – What is the amount of surface area in the potable water tanks (in square feet) Answer 39: The government does not provide total surface area. The contractor shall estimate using referenced drawings.

Question 40: For specification 058-HH-20.4.2 – The item directs to spot prepare to remove “loose paint and rust”.

What is the amount of surface area (in square feet) to be prepared?

Answer 40: Estimate 1,376 square feet for each tank.

Question 41: For specification 058-HH-20.4.3 – What is the amount of surface area for each of the spaces listed

(in square feet) to be cleaned?

Answer 41: The government does not provide total surface area. The contractor shall estimate using referenced drawings and field visit.

Question 42: For specification 058-HH-20.4.4 – What is the amount of surface area of the items / spaces listed (in square feet) to be cleaned?

Answer 42: The government does not provide total surface area. The contractor shall estimate using referenced drawings and field visit.

Question 43: For specification 086 MA-2 – What is the amount of surface area in these tanks (in square feet)?

Answer 43: The government does not provide total surface area. The contractor shall estimate using referenced drawings and field visit.

Question 44: For specification 086 MA-2 – The item directs to spot prepare select area, what is the amount of surface area (in square feet) to be prepared?

Answer 44: Estimate 100 square feet per tank.

Question 45: For specification 089 MA-5 – Due to the hazards of UHP water blasting inside of tanks, could the contractor utilize grit blasting to an SP-6 (which is the equivalent to a WJ-3) in these tanks? Or could power tools (SP-3) be used?

Answer 45: No, grit blasting is not allowed in potable water tanks due to the possibility of grit/sand to be remained in the tanks, which poses health hazard to the potable water system and the crew. The potable water tanks are large enough for water blasting methods, which have been used in all previous drydocks.

Question 46: Would the USACE allow progress billing if awarded. As a small business cash flow is an issue and to facilitate more small business to bid this opportunity and in turn including more offerors; would the Government consider Progress billing such as 20/40/60/80 and 100%. In addition, any identified material costs for major items could be INVOICED upon ordering. Once again this would assist small business offerors submitting a best response.

Answer 46: Partial invoicing will be allowed. After award, the Contracting Officer Representative (COR) can discuss an acceptable review duration (weekly, biweekly, monthly, etc) for completed work. Each progress review will be documented and invoicing can match the agreed upon percentages throughout the duration of the project.

Question 47: We would like clarification on the Performance Work Statement Part 2- Drydocking paragraph 3 “The blocks in the drydock (graving or floating docks) must be minimum of six (6) feet high (Note: Blocks are less than 5 feet high shall not be accepted).” Will 5’ cribbing blocks be acceptable?

Answer 47: No, 5’ cribbing blocks are not acceptable.

Question 48: Wanted to confirm docking draft of 18’ fwd and 22’ aft.

Answer 48: The ship will arrive as close to these conditions as possible. The docking conditions will be updated closer to arrival to ensure accurate accurate calculations/docking plan.

Question 49: WI 0063 – Please advise if the shipyard or government is shipping the tailshaft, if it is the shipyard please provide destination.

Answer 49: The government will ship the tailshaft to the contractor facility.

Question 50: WI 0064 – Item states that the blade bolts (QTY 32) are contractor furnished in the list of materials but then states “Test each propeller blade bolt (either Government furnished bolts or bolts previously removed – total quantity of 32). Please advise who is providing the blade bolts.

Answer 50: WI 0064 states that the contractor will furnish blade bolt washers, not the blade bolts themselves.

The contractor should test the removed blade bolts as specified and re-use them if they are in good condition.

Question 51: WI 0071 – Item states there is a quantity of 23 valves but also states the quantity is 14. Please advise as to how many valves are being inspected.

Answer 51: The work item states that there is a quantity of 23 valves total, 14 of which are 18-inch bore located in the hopper bay area.

Question 52: Work Item calls for HARDOX 400 materials. This material is not readily available in the sizes indicated.

Can the Customer supply these materials or provide a vendor to contact?

Answer 52: ASTM-A242 (CORTEN) steel can by used in lieu of HARDOX 400.

Question 53: Please provide the estimated Liquid Load for arrival in regards to the planned yard period.

Answer 53: USACE can provide a liquid load report prior to drydocking at the contractor facility. For planning purposes, the contractor should use the provided stability booklet and estimated draft conditions upon arrival.

Question 54: Please provide the make, model number, horsepower rating and shaft size for the Oil Water Separator

Motor. This information is required for quoting purposes.

Answer 54: See attachment OWS 9-23-13 (a). The contractor should work with the Alfa Laval technical representative for detailed quotation.

Question 55: Spec for work item 0043 HH-9.1 calls for prepping for paint with UHP water blasting to WJ-1. This standard is extremely difficult to attain. Contractor proposes UHP blasting to WJ-2, considered the equivalent to SSPC SP-10, Near White.

Answer 55: Yes, WJ-2 would be acceptable for item HH-9.1.

Question 56: Will the US Army Corps of Engineers consider reducing the performance and payment bond from

100% of the original contract price to 20% of the original contract price?

Answer 56: No, USACE will require performance and payment bonds at 100% of the original contract price.

Question 57: PARAGRAPH 3. Center Door Seals: The paragraph states “A quantity (4) locations, one for each door with a center seal, shall be replaced.” There are 14 door sets. Please clarify this paragraph. Is it (4) door sets or (14)?

Answer 57: All 14 center seals are being replaced. The four (4) locations specified in paragraph 3 of the item is referring to the retaining flat bar for the center seal. The government will direct the contractor on which four (4) retaining bars we would like to replace after inspection.

USACE would also like to clarify for item DD-6.13, when we specify a complete gasket set for each door assembly, we are referring to the four (4) peripheral seals and one (1) center seal. For all 14 hopper door assemblies, there will be a total of fifty-six (56) peripheral seals replaced and fourteen

(14) center seals replaced.

Question 58: Will the Owners have their own independent paint representative on this project, or will the coatings manufacture representative be handling inspections and oversight?

Answer 58: The contractor should supply the on-site services of the paint manufacturer’s representative.

Question 59: Item 0001: Drydocking

Cleaning of the Hopper (page C-19, can the owner provide assistance on how to price this item? It is impossible to accurately estimate the amount of cleaning required in the Hopper upon arrival. Could we provide Level of Effort pricing / day rate pricing / man hour rates, T&M?

Answer 59: In reference to item DD-1, the contractor should anticipate a minimal washdown of the hopper structures mentioned in DD-1 and hopper seal areas where residual mud is trapped. Focus should be on areas where work is planned such as the transverse beams and hopper door areas. USACE will not accept an alternative to firm fixed pricing for this contract.

Question 60: Item HH-2: Hopper Bay Plating and Other Steel Repairs

For the touch up items, most provides direction for the touch up coating of the interior and exterior.

Where the term “power tool clean” is used can we assume this to be power tool clean to an SP-3 standard?

Answer 60: Where power tool clean is specified, it is acceptable to assume it is to be cleaned to SP-3 standard.

Question 61: Item 058 HH-20.4.3: Bilges, Bilge Drain Wells and Tank Tops Can the owner provide assistance on how to price this item? It is impossible to accurately estimate the amount of cleaning required in these spaces at the end of the availability when its condition at arrival isn’t known and how dirty it will become during the repair period cannot be ascertained. Could we provide Level of Effort pricing / day rate pricing / man hour rates, T&M?

Answer 61: In reference to item HH-20.4.3, the contractor should anticipate oil residue and oily water in these areas. Any water generated from cleaning this will need to be pumped out by the contractor. At the end of the availability period, there is typically trash left behind in these spaces that should be removed. USACE will not accept an alternative to firm fixed pricing for this contract.

Question 62: Item 058 HH-20.4.4: Floor Plates and Incline Ladders

Can the owner provide assistance on how to price this item? It is impossible to accurately estimate the amount of cleaning required in these spaces at the end of the availability when its condition at arrival isn’t known and who dirty it will become during the repair period cannot be ascertained. Could we provide Level of Effort pricing / day rate pricing / man hour rates, T&M?

Answer 62: In reference to item HH-20.4.4, the contractor should anticipate wiping down handrails and sweeping the decks as needed. USACE will not accept an alternative to firm fixed pricing for this contract.

Question 63: How much fuel will need to be removed from the vessel and / or disposed of?

Answer 63: Estimate 50,000 gallons of fuel to be removed.

Question 64: Work item states to estimate 8,000 gallons of oily water to pump out and dispose of……is this correct?

Please state which ballast tanks have oily water in them.

Answer 64: Oily water would more than likely be present in the open void double bottoms resulting from equipment hydraulic leaks rather than the closed ballast tanks. The 8,000 gallons is only counted towards those spaces listed in item HH-16 and not the dirty lube oil, oily bilges and sludge tanks listed in item HH-17 that also need to be pumped out and cleaned. The contractor should plan for the tanks in item HH-17 being filled to their capacity.

Question 65: Paragraph H-4(h) of the Solicitation requires the Contractor to provide security for the main gangway. Please clarify if the security personnel are required to be armed or unarmed.

Answer 65: Security can be unarmed.

Question 66: The solicitation includes FAR 52.228-16 Performance and Payment Bonds – Other Than Construction (Nov 2006) with a requirement to furnish both a performance bond and a payment bond in an amount equal to 100% of the original contract price. There is an allowance in the solicitation to provide an irrevocable letter of credit in lieu of the bond. Please confirm large corporations with a history of successfully executing this type of work can document this past history and are not required to provide the bonds specified (performance bond or payment bond) or the irrevocable letter of credit.

Answer 66: Payment and Performance bonds will be required from all interested firms for this procurement.

Question 67: On item 0068 MP-3.1 the spec calls for a Rolls-Royce technical representative but according to Rolls- Royce the steering gear is no longer part of Rolls-Royce and was directed us to reach out to Kongsberg directly.

Please confirm Kongsberg is an acceptable substitution for Rolls-Royce as the technical representative for this item?

Answer 67: Kongsberg is an acceptable substitute technical representative for item MP-3.1.

VENDOR Q&A #1

W912P824B0054 Questions and Answers

Question: WI 0089 – this item states to clean, blast and paint the two potable water tanks but those tanks are currently in WI’s 0058 and 0059 for blasting and coating. Please advise if we are to price these tanks twice or if there will be a revised work item forthcoming.

Answer: WI 0089 references item 0058 and 0059 within the scope for cleaning, blasting, and painting. Pricing for cleaning, blasting, and painting should therefore be included in items 0058 and 0059 and not item 0089. All other work included in WI 0089 should be priced in that item.

Question: WI 0079 – is staging required to complete these works?

Answer: No

Question: WI 0080 – is staging required to complete these works?

Answer: Yes

Question: Item 0001 DD-1 states the contractor must have a drydock facility available between the dates of 01-September and 01-Decemeber 2024 however, the actual entrance and exit dates for Drydocking will be negotiated after contract award and documented in a bilateral contract modification. Please confirm the contractor can propose drydock dates outside of the 01-September to 01-Decemeber 2024 timeframe as part of their bid package and still be compliant to the solicitation requirements.

Answer: Yes, the contractor can submit availability outside of the requested timeframe.

Question: Section I of the contract has clause 52.217-9 OPTION TO EXTEND THE TERM OF THE CONTRACT (MAR 2000) which states in c) the total duration of this contract, including the exercise of any options under this clause, shall not exceed 80 calendar days. When would the Army Corps intended to turn on any option works as the option works will take some time to complete. Would they be turned on before arrival or within 10%/20%/30% of availability duration?

Answer: Optional items are issued as USACE inspectors, Coast Guard and ABS can inspect structure and equipment on the ship. USACE will not garunte a timeframe of issuance since these items are meant for use as the need arises. Reference section H-2 of the contract for additional information regarding optionals.

SECTION H - SPECIAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS

The following have been deleted:

252.217-7003 Changes DEC 1991 252.217-7004 Job Orders and Compensation MAY 2006 252.217-7005 Inspection and Manner of Doing Work JUL 2009 252.217-7006 Title DEC 1991 252.217-7007 Payments DEC 1991 252.217-7008 Bonds DEC 1991 252.217-7009 Default DEC 1991 252.217-7010 Performance JUL 2009 252.217-7011 Access to Vessel DEC 1991 252.217-7012 Liability and Insurance AUG 2003 252.217-7013 Guarantees DEC 1991 252.217-7014 Discharge of Liens DEC 1991 252.217-7015 Safety and Health DEC 1991 252.217-7016 Plant Protection DEC 1991

SECTION I - CONTRACT CLAUSES

The following have been added by reference:

52.249-8 Default (Fixed-Price Supply & Service) APR 1984

The following have been deleted:

52.249-4 Termination For Convenience Of The Government (Services)

(Short Form)

APR 1984

52.249-8 Default (Fixed-Price Supply & Service) APR 1984 252.225-7048 Export-Controlled Items JUN 2013

(End of Summary of Changes)