Questions and Answers.pdf

Questions and Answers

1.) Question:

Please let us know if it is acceptable to substitute a commercial grade insulated concrete form for the CMU on this project. ICF will eliminate the block masons, much of the structural steel and the insulation subcontractor for the exterior walls on the office portion of the warehouse.

ICFs are permanent forms for building energy efficient concrete buildings. After the concrete cures, the form stays in place and serves as thermal and acoustic insulation. You get a structural wall, fully insulated and ready for interior and exterior finishes all in one fast step for $11 to $15 per sqft. Big Block™ is used for multi-family, hotels, offices, barracks, dormitories, theatres, schools – even firing ranges, airplane hangars and specialized training facilities.

Answer:

Not Acceptable.

2.) Question:

Wondering is the pre bid on July 27th is mandatory?

Is there a bid bond required or just performance bond?

Is there a more specific budget for project I have $10M-$25M?

Answer:

The pre-bid site visit is not mandatory; however, we highly encourage attendance.

Bid guarantee is required besides performance & payment bonds, please refer to FAR Clause 52.228-1

The construction range magnitude for this requirement is 10M-25M, any additional information cannot be disclosed.

3.) Question:

Can you please tell me what the engineer’s estimate of the construction cost is on this project?

Answer:

The construction range magnitude for this requirement is 10M-25M, any additional information cannot be disclosed.

4.) Question:

We are unable to retrieve the plans and specs from your FTP site. Can you please provide us with a method to retrieve them?

Answer:

I have addressed the issue with my IT department; they are in the process of determining what causes that as I am still able to view the documents. Please try to access the documents via this link:

ftp://ftp.usace.army.mil/pub/lrb/BTV%20Specs%20&%20Drawings/

5.) Question:

The FTP site link provided does not have any documents loaded for the above referenced project.

If you can let me know when they will be uploaded, I would appreciate it.

Answer:

I have addressed the issue with my IT department; they are in the process of determining what causes that as I am still able to view the documents. Please try to access the documents via this link:

ftp://ftp.usace.army.mil/pub/lrb/BTV%20Specs%20&%20Drawings

6.) Question:

Please advise recommended arrival time to check-in security desk for 7/27 10:00 AM pre-bid site visit.

I would give yourself at least 20-30 min.

7.) Question:

It does not look like the documents are there on the FTP site.

Please try opening the internet page with Internet Explorer (not Mozilla), and if still unable to view the documents on the FTP site then follow these steps:

1.Tools -> Internet Options -> General tab -> Click on Settings under the Browsing History -> select the radio button to say ‘Every time I visit the webpage’

2. Tools -> Internet Options -> Advanced tab ->place a check mark in the following boxes -Use

SSL 2.0

-Use SSL 3.0

-Use SSl 1.0

-Enable FTP folder view (outside of Internet Explorer

8.) Question:

a.) Division 28, Electronic Safety & Security, is the existing system being expended or would a new system be added?

b.) Will the tasks be individually awarded?

Answer:

a.) Refer to general notes in EY drawings for direction.

b.) This will be a single contract award; therefore there will NOT be individual task awards.

9.) Question:

Will this be under the PLA (project labor agreement), will government awards contract for this public construction project exclusively to unionized firms?

Answer:

Federal government does not require those types of agreements, however, at the minimum you must adhere to the wage rates identified in the Davis-Bacon Act.

10.) Question:

Is this a Design & Build project or has the design stage already been completed?

The Design segment has already been completed; this project will consist of construction ONLY.

11.) Question:

We are wondering if we can purchase a set of plans and specs for this project.

Answer:

The government does not make any documents available for purchase; therefore the solicitation is available by download only. No hardcopies, faxes, or emails will be available.

12.) Question:

Are the plans and specifications for this Project available on a CD? If so, how could we obtain a copy of the cd for purposes of bidding the electrical portion of the project?

Answer:

I am having a few CD's made to take with me to the pre-bid site visit tomorrow.

You can obtain a copy if you are attending. If not, if you can stop by the District Office and pick one up.

13.) Question:

Will there be another walk through?

Additional site visits will not be scheduled.

14.) Question:

Could you please advise who attended the pre-bid site visit on July 27, 2011 and also how do I get a planholder's list? We are interested in bidding this project as a Detention Equipment & Furnishings manufacturer.

In a short amount of time the sign-in sheet from the pre-bid site visit will be posted to FBO as an amendment.

Since the solicitation and all of the corresponding documents are posted on FedBizOps (which makes it available for the entire nation to view) we are unable to generate any type of a plan-holder's list.

This will be a single contract award made to a qualified general contractor.

15.) Question:

Could you please supply me with the plan holder list for Buffalo Federal Detention Facility Expansion project, bidding 8/8/11?

Also, any addenda with changes regarding this project?

Answer:

Proposals are due by 15:00 EST 23 September, 2011.

Since the solicitation and all of the corresponding documents are posted on FedBizOps (which makes it available for the entire nation to view) we are unable to generate any type of a plan-holder's list.

However, in a short amount of time the sign-in sheet from the pre-bid site visit will be posted to FBO as an amendment.

I advise that you continue to check the referenced solicitation on FedBizOps for any further changes and updates.

16.) Question:

Do we have the permission to post the corresponding drawings, plans & specs to our Estimating website in order to solicit subcontractors?

The solicitation and all of the related documents are posted on FedBizOps, therefore available for the public to view. You may utilize your established methods to assist you in being able to prepare a proposal for the project.

17.) Question:

How do I go about purchasing plans and specs for the Buffalo Fed. Detention Facility project, W91P411R0016?

Answer:

The government does not make any documents available for purchase; therefore the solicitation is available by download only. No hardcopies, faxes, or emails will be available.

You can access the solicitation package document on FBO, as well as the hyperlink to access an FTP site with drawings, Plans & Specs.

18.) Question:

Upon reviewing the plans and specs for the above referenced project it has come to my attention that the details (2-A312 for example), show reference to a continuous spray applied vapor barrier, however there is no specification for such a product.

The Henry Company supplies air/vapor barrier products and are readily available in the Buffalo NY area.

I have attached data sheets on 2 products you may wish to consider for your specification.

Please advise if an addendum with be forthcoming.

Addendum will be issued for the bid documents with Relevant description & performance.

19.) Question:

Is there a specific contract document form you require to be included with requests for product approval sent for consideration?

All products will be required to adhere to applicable contract specifications.

20.) Question:

What is the correct procedure to submit questions for the above referenced project? Both for clarification to the solicitation and any technical questions.

Any questions regarding the referenced solicitation must be submitted to the contract specialist via e-mail. If your question is related to contracting it will be answered by a reply. Any questions related to plans, specs, etc will be referred further. A reply will be posted on FedBizOps after the question cut-off period (August 10, 2011) via an answered RFI (Request For Information) document.

21.) Question:

Terry Littell advised that I contact you in regards to the Federal Detention Facility in Buffalo. Most of the Federal prisons we have done have a 22 gauge metal specification. My question is would you entertain a substitution for Englert 22 gauge Bone White SRI 81.4 for the metal on your project?

Answer:

The project is to be bid for materials specified in the construction documents. Consideration of alternates or alternate materials will be conducted during the construction phase.

22.) Question:

We would like to request either the Revit model or a 3D/2D DWF of the drawings for the above mentioned project. Any questions, please feel free to contact me.

These electronic files will not be provided to prospective bidders.

23.) Question:

a. SF 1442 Block 13 asks for an original and four copies but on Page 5 of 145, it calls for an original and three copies. Can you please clarify what needs to be submitted?

b. Page 7 of 145, 4.4 Tab E asks for Corporate Experience and Past Performance. Yet, when you look at the forms on pages 13 and 15 of 145, Corporate Experience is referred to as Tab E and Past Performance is referred to as Tab F. Which one is correct?

c. Page 9 of 145 makes mention of Contractor Team Arrangements (5.1.1) under Corporate Experience but on Page 7 of 145, there is specific direction as to the page count – 18 pages – along with how each page is broken down. Where does the Contractor Team Arrangements go? Do the included agreements impact the page count?

d. Page 8 of 145, Tab G states that the page count for Key Personnel is 10 pages – Two pages per each listed Key Personnel. When you turn to page 10 of 145, 5.2.1 Submission Requirements, it states that the Offeror has to submit resumes for the following Key Personnel and lists eight key personnel, which would make the page total 16 pages. Can you please clarify?

e. Page 10 of 145, 5.3.1 under Submission Requirements, three of the Key Personnel positions are Senior Electrical Engineer, Senior Mechanical Engineer and Senior Civil Engineer. On page 11, there are degree specifications for these individuals. As this is a plans and specifications construction project, what role are the engineers expected to play on this project?

Answer:

a. We will need for you to submit a total of 4(four) sets of Volume II (Original and three copies).

b. Tab E is the correct tab for Corporate Experience & Past Performance. Both Forms on pages 13 and 15, Corporate Experience and Past Performance should be part of TAB E.

c. Offeror’s are to integrate their teaming arrangements into the Corporate Relevant Experience Form and to be mindful of Part 2 (pg. 5 of 145) of Section 00113. If further explanation of teaming arrangements is needed, they can be incorporated into pgs. 2 & 3 of the 3-page allotment for Corporate Relevant Experience IAW Part 4.4 of Section 00113.

We will accept additional pages under the corporate experience ONLY under the condition that it relates to a recognized SBA Joint Ventures, Mentor-Protégé & teaming arrangements.

d & e. We will issue an addendum to Section 00113 of the solicitation package, removing Senior Electrical Engineer, Senior Mechanical Engineer and Senior Civil Engineer from the key personnel.

Offeror’s are to submit a maximum of two pages per identified Key Personnel in Part 5.3.1 in Section 00113. As such, a total of 10-pages will be allowed.

24.) Question:

This is a four-part inquiry.

First, please find attached our formal request for your consideration of Hope’s Security Windows as an approved manufacturer of the detention windows required for this project. Hope’s is the leading manufacturer of detention windows in the United States. Their manufacturing facility and corporate office is located in Jamestown, NY.

In addition to our formal request form you will also find technical data specific to the window type were are requesting your approval.

Second, Section 08 56 63, Part 2 Products, 2.1.3 Tool Resisting Steel Bars requires Grade 2 Composite T.R. Steel bar in accordance with ASTM A627. Based on the selection charts outlined in the ASTM A627-

03 guidelines, a Grade 1 or Grade 2 composite bar is only required in areas of no observation. An example of an application in which there is no observation would be something like a drainage sewer or vent located in a plumbing chase. A Grade 2 bar is typically not require on a detention window application and will drastically increase the cost of the specified windows and are not necessary for this application.

Please review and advise if Grade 3 detention bars will be acceptable.

Third, Section 08 56 63, Part 2 Products, 2.1.1 Stainless Steel. Stainless steel systems are primarily specified for the perceived lower maintenance at exterior applications. Since the exterior is specified to be aluminum, Hope’s recommends the interior frames be changed to factory pre-finished steel. This change would reduce cost by +\- 20% and provide equal value and security to the owner.

Please verify if a factory pre-finished interior steel frame is acceptable, provided all quality assurance criteria are met.

Finally, reference drawing A610, details 4 and 5, SHU Security Window details. The drawings indicate an insulated glazing unit on the exterior of the window, plus another glazing piece located on the interior side of the window. The interior piece requirement is an unusual request for a detention window in that the integral window bars provide the security element, while the exterior glazing offers the insulation factor. The addition of this glazing unit results in added costs for both the additional glass and window fabrication, as well as a maintenance factor.

Answer:

1. Product is Not Equivalent, thus not an acceptable substitution.

2. Grade 3 bars are acceptable.

3. Pre-Finished Steel is Not an Acceptable substitution.

4. There is not a question in the last statement, nothing to respond to.

25.) Question:

I am writing to ask how the quality control and quality assurance will be handled on the project. This would include special inspections and testing of construction materials and work. Normally the contract for these services is with the owner.

Quality control and quality assurance measures are addressed in the solicitation.

26.) Question:

I am a supplier of emergency generators and represent the Generac Generator Line.

Briefly looking through the specification Section 263213, I noticed that the Generator Engine shall operate at 1800 RPM.

I am looking to see if 2300 RPM for the engine speed can be added to the Specification.

This application of running the Engines at higher RPM has been common practice for us for many years and has been accepted widely the New York State Engineering community. We do have many examples of these system in the field if you wish for reference. Also, the increased RPM engines are being produced by another major generator manufacturer that may be looking at this project.

Answer:

We recommend staying with the specified 1800 RPM generator.

(note: From what we understand about the 2300 rpm units, they still drive a 1800 rpm generator through a gear drive unit, which is an additional component to maintain, and possibly fail).

27.) Question:

Our company, U&S Services, has a Building Automation system that covers most of the Federal Detention Center in Batavia, NY.

I notice a project out to bid for the facility but the documents do not include a 230923 DDC Controls section that covers work for Building Automation even though there is a substantial DDC Commissioning specification spec that leads me to believe there is some control work required.

We would be happy to help in any way we can, Please let me know what the status is for the specifications.

Controls are covered on sheet M-701.

28.) Question:

Refer to drawing attached where the question marks are.

The item being refered to indicated that the detail is on drawing c-311,c-311 was not incorporated in the contract documents released to bidders.

Trench drain detail is on sheet C-304. There is no sheet C-311 in the bid documents.

29.) Question:

We would like some clarification on the specifications of the above referenced project. In the Room Finish Schedule, Code 35 Ceramic Wall Tile, American Olean Satinbrites are listed with colors 0Y12 Gloss Almond and 0Y38 Mushroom. The size listed is 4¼” x 4¼”. The Satinbrites are available in 2”x2” tiles only. The Gloss Almond and Mushroom ARE available in the 4¼” x 4¼” size in the American Olean Bright & Matte line. The corresponding color numbers are 0012 and 0038 respectively. Please advise if this description should read 2”x2” Satinbrites or 4¼ x4¼ Bright & Matte.

Answer:

The schedule should read: 4 1/4" x 4 1/4" Bright and Matte.

The corresponding numbers are 0012 Gloss Almond and 0038 Gloss Mushroom.

30.) Question:

Will the Government consider allowing the offeror to provide past performance surveys obtained for other solicitations? With the number of solicitations currently out, continually requesting new ones – and in this case the need to have them returned in a sealed envelope, rather than e-mailing or faxing them back – creates quite a burden upon our clients.

Please consider allowing the offeror to provide past performance surveys obtained for other solicitations.

Answer:

Contractors may use past performance surveys from other solicitations. As such, past performance surveys don’t have to be sealed.

31.) Question:

For the above referenced project, we would like to view the outdoor area where the warehouse is going to go. It is outside the perimeter fence but within the no trespassing area. We were told that we needed to set-up an escort in order to do this. Who is the correct person to speak to about this?

Bidders may observe the site from outside the secured area from the public road at their leisure. If bidders plan to observe the site from the road, they should inform the gate guard what they are doing and how long they will be here. Bidders can park on the road and observe from there. If bidders need to come onto the property, then they must submit a formal request to the USACE with names of all the visitors, the company and time and date at least three days in advance of the site visit. This information will be forwarded to the BFDF for approval. Bidders shall not visit the site until they have been formally approved. Once approved the visitors must report to the gate guard and a pass will be issued. Proper identification will be required to gain entry to grounds.

32.) Question:

The fiber roll required for the toe of the detention ponds and slopes.

What are the astm minimum requirements for the product? it is not addressed in the specs.

Refer to drawing c-151

Also is there a leed certified goal for the project if so what is the goal (silver, gold, ect…….)

Answer:

1. Fiber roll requirements:

Tested and passing ASTM D6459 with the following properties:

Minimum mass per unit area: ASTM D6475 of 8 oz/sq yd

Minimum thickness: ASTM D6525 of 0.25 in

Minimum initial grab tensile strength: ASTM D6818 of 75 x 75 lb/ft

2. LEED documenation covered in section 01 33 29.

33.) Question:

There is supposed to be a specification section 23 09 23 "Direct Digital Control Systems for HVAC" included in the bid documents like this one (See attached) for a recent Niagara Falls Airforce Base project.

Expand capacity and upgrade the existing Andover system as required to accommodate the new equipment. Include all wiring, conduit equipment, accessories, programming, and testing required controlling the new AHUs and terminal units.

34.) Question:

We recommend staying with the specified 1800 RPM generator.

(note: From what we understand about the 2300 rpm units, they still drive a 1800 rpm generator through a gear drive unit, which is an additional component to maintain, and possibly fail).

Answer:

1. Glazing: Outer Glazing is 08 81 00; Insulating Glass Unit (IGU). Inner Glazing is 08 88 53; Type D5.

2. Bars: Grade 3 is acceptable.

35.) Question:

I am with MMI and have a couple of questions for you. Is the bidding closed? If so, is there an intent to award? When is the project slated to start? Is USACE the Construction Managers?

Answer:

Proposal Due Date: Proposals are due by 15:00 EST 23 September, 2011. Proposals shall be delivered to Oksana Strekha, Contracting Division, Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Buffalo District, 1776 Niagara Street, Buffalo, NY 14207-3199.

We anticipate awarding the contract in late September with a start date following soon after.

USACE will oversee this construction contract.

36.) Question:

Is Division 28, Electronic Security System being bid under the above referenced project or will it be bid under a separate contract? We have noticed that the electrical EY series drawings are showing security devices but have a note stating that all devices will be provided under a separate contract. Please advise.

This is essentially the same question as RFI #8 - Please refer to the response for RFI #8 (Question 8).

37.) Question:

For the referenced project, is there a ProjNet site and Bid Inquiry Key for RFI’s?

If not, we have the following question:

1) Since the project is not Design-Build, is it necessary to have a Senior Electrical Engineer, Senior Mechanical Engineer and Senior Civil Engineer per Section 00113, 5.3.1?

Answer:

We will not be utilizing ProjNet site or Bid Inquiry Key for RFI’s. The proper way to submit your RFI's are to e-mail them to me.

We will issue an addendum to Section 00113 of the solicitation package, removing Senior Electrical Engineer, Senior Mechanical Engineer and Senior Civil Engineer from the key personnel. Offeror’s are to submit a maximum of two pages per identified Key Personnel in Part 5.3.1 in Section 00113. As such, a total of 10-pages will be allowed.

38.) Question:

P-1-Reference Specification 22 00 00 Table I Pages 50,51 *The table lists PVC DWV Pipe acceptable for U/G sanitary & storm pipe as well as above ground use. I'm just looking for a clarification that this is true.

Specification section 22 00 00 Table I #20 is correct – no revisions required.

39.) Question:

• Q1.Previous contracts on this project site have encountered Dolomite rock in many areas. Is there a geotechnical survey that was completed for this project?

• Answer: Geotechnical Engineering Report prepared by Terracon Consultants, Inc. as project No.

N6105029 dated July 28, 2010. Available from Contracting Officer.

• Q2.Drawing C-001 -- Demolition notes -- #6 states "All contaminated soil shall be removed and legally disposed of off-site." Please clarify what soil is contaminated and what means of payment should be anticipated for it?

• Answer: Note 6 describes what to do if any contaminated soil is discovered, no contaminated soil is currently anticipated for this project.

• Q3.Drawing C-001 -- Grading notes -- #1 states "All off-site fill that is required shall be certified satisfactory soil per geotechnical recommendations." Please provide a copy of the Geotech report or recommendations so contractors can determine the scope of the requirements.

• Answer: Refer to Question Q1 above for Geotechnical Report.

• Q4.Drawing C-122 -- On the left side of the page, there is an indicator for sheet note #4. No sheet note #4 exists. Please provide.

• Answer: Use plan note #3 – there is no plan note #4.

• Q5.Can the gas and water services shown to be relocated on drawing 142 be tied in using a shut down or are wet/hot taps required?

• Answer: HDR assumes that wet/hot taps are required unless other arrangements can be made with the facility.

• Q5.Drawing C-122 Center Top of Sheet. There is a note that states "Reroute existing storm drain pipe to clear new work. A. Please provide the pipe type and size. B. Are fittings suitable for this relocation or must structures be used?

• Answer: The referenced note is actually on sheet C-142. No data is available on the type of existing piping. It is assumed that the piping material is Sch 40 PVC. Sch 40 PVC shall be used with fittings as required to clear new work, structures not required.

• Q6.Drawing C-300. Detail #3. Heavy Duty Concrete Pavement. Typically double layers of mesh do not support well during placing operations. Would the engineer allow bar reinforcing instead?

• Answer: Bar reinforcement may be used instead of mesh.

• Q7.Drawing C-301. Detail #6. There is a 3/4" dimension in the section just above the 10" of aggregate base. What does this represent?

• Answer: Detail has been revised to eliminate the ¾” dimension, section thickness from top of GrassPave unit to bottom of aggregate base is to be 1.25’ minimum.

• Q8.Drawing C-142. On the plan at the 6" FW line tie-in, the main has a designation of 8". Note #2 call out to assume the existing to be 6". Please clarify 8" or 6".

• Answer: Assume 6” existing pipe size. Gate valve size to match existing pipe size, which is assumed 6”. Filed verify existing pipe size – new piping and fittings to match existing pipe size.

• Q9.Drawing C-141. ST CB 2-3 Calls out a detail 2/C-305. Detail #2 on C-305 is a trench detail.

Please clarify.

• Answer: Use detail 2/C303.

• Q11. Drawing C-305. Detail #3 -- Where is this detail used?

• Answer: Detail 3 not used.

• Q12. Drawing C-305. Detail #3. An inside dimension of 1'-6" x 1'-6" is not large enough to accommodate the 18" RCP shown. Please clarify.

• Answer: Detail 3 not used.

• Q13. Spec Section 31-00-00 1.3.2 Unsatisfactory soils. Include man made fills. A thorough geotechnical report is required to estimate any fill quantities from previous work on the site.

• Answer: Refer to question Q1 for obtaining Geotechnical Report.

• Q14. Spec Section 31-00-00 3.1 Calls for stripping topsoil to a depth of 12". Please confirm that there is 12" of topsoil on site.

• Answer: Refer to Geotechnical Report – topsoil depth varies but must be removed from areas being improved.

• Q15. Spec Section 31-00-00 3.2. Please indicate where the storage/waste areas are on site for surplus satisfactory and unsatisfactory materials

• Answer: Some excess spoils may be wasted on site – under direction of Contracting Officer, but excess spoils shall be removed from site.

• Q16. Spec Section 31-00-00 3.6 Please clarify when this paragraph will be utilized by the Contracting officer. Limiting cut to fill operation may develop significant cost impacts.

• Answer: No grading area limitations are shown or indicated on the drawings.

• Q17. Spec Section 31-00-00 3.12.2 Water Lines Is it the intention that the project fire lines be 7' bury?

• Answer: Fire water piping to have 5 feet of cover.

• Q18. Spec Section 31-00-00 3.12.2 Please confirm that fire lines include all water lines on the project that either have a FW designation or a hydrant on the line. Is this correct?

• Answer: Correct.

• Q19. Spec Section 33-40-00. Storm Drainage. Paragraph 2.4 calls for galvanized steel ladders while Drawings C-305 Details (#5) Co-Polymer rungs. Please clarify.

• Answer: Galvanized steel or co-polymer rungs are acceptable.

• Q20. Drawing C-305 Detail #2. Note -- calls for areas of low permeability fill. No such material is identified in the specification. Please provide a specification for this material.

• Answer: Low permeability backfill: soil material having a maximum particle size of 5 mm designated as silty or clayey soils (ML or CL).

• Q21. Spec Section 31-00-00 3.17 Calls for 6" of topsoil placement. Spec Section 31-23-00 3.13.2 calls for 4" topsoil placement. Please clarify.

• Answer: Place 6” of topsoil.

• Q22.Spec Section 31-32-11 3.3.15 Articulating cellular block system. Is section used? 31113.3.15 systems section used? Clarify.

• Answer: Articulated cellular blocks not used.

• Q23. Spec Section 32-01-16.17 Cold Milling. Where is this specification to be applied?

• Answer: Cold milling MAY be preferred where new pavement ties in to existing pavement to provide a smooth neat transition.

• Q24. There are several references in the specifications to unit price measurement and payment.

(Example Section 32-01-19 field molded servants for sealing joints in rigid pavements). Please clarify that this is a lump sum contract and the unit price references were in error.

• Answer: This work is lump sum.

• Q25. Drawing C-301, Detail #6. Where is the gravel paver 2 porous paver system specified?

• Answer: Refer to C-121 and C-122, porous paver system used for fire lane south of warehouse and for fire/utility lane between SHU Addition and main Building.

• Q26. Spec Section 32-17-24 3.2.2 Raised Reflective Markers. Are any required on this project?

• Answer: No raised reflective markers used.

• Q27. Solicitation Page 105 of 145, paragraph 1.82 - Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) states that the Contractor will implement the SWPPP that was prepared by the A-E as shown on the plans and as directed in these specifications. Specification 01 57 19.00 20 requires the Contractor to submit a SWPPP plan for Government approval. Please clarify if the A-E or the contractor is responsible to prepare the required SWPPP. If the A-E has already prepared the SWPPP, can a copy be provided prior to bid?

• Answer: SWPPP has been prepared and will be provided to Contracting Officer for distribution to Contractor.

• Q28. Section 00700 - Contract Clauses references 52.236-7 Permits and Responsibilities which requires the contractor to be responsible for obtaining all necessary licenses and permits.

Federal Projects typically do not require local building permits and licenses. Are local building permits and licenses necessary for this project?

• Answer: Sewer and water connection permits from the Town of Batavia are required.

• Q29. Drawing AD-101 Demolition Plan does not define wall, ceiling or floor covering types for existing features to be demolished. Note 2 says that contractor shall verify all field conditions in the bidding process. During the site visit, we were not allowed in these areas. Can the Government provide information on existing wall, ceiling and flooring types to facilitate accurate estimating, or does every contractor need to schedule further site visits to take detailed notes in these areas?

• Answer: No additional demolition notes will be provided. Coordinate with Contracting Officer if field visit is required.

• Q30. Specification 01 45 00.00 10 - Quality Control, paragraph 3.4.1 - Personnel Requirements, requires the contractor to have a CQC System Manager and a Design Quality Manager. Is the requirement for the Design Quality Manager an error?

• Answer: There are no design requirements of the Contractor, therefore there is no need for a “Design Quality Manager”.

• Q31. The international Building Code is referenced in the specifications and requires that the owner or the registered design professional in responsible charge acting as the owner’s agent, employs one or more special inspectors to provide inspections during construction on specific aspects of the work. The specifications appear to require many of these same inspections to be completed by the contractor. Are the specified inspections which are also required special inspections per IBC to be completed by an inspection agency retained by the Government or retained by the contractor?

• Answer: All testing shall be completed in accordance with Specification Section 014500.00.

• Q32. Spec Section 23.05.15, Page 10, Paragraph 2.1.5.1 states solder must be 60-40 tin-antimony. This type of solder is no longer allowed in the industry. Industry standard is 95-5-Lead Free. Please advise.

• Answer: Type “L” copper…

• Q33. What type of fitting is required at the exterior building face for all overflow drains?

• Answer: JR Smith 1775-U

• Q34. There is no detail of domestic water tie-ins on DrawingPP-101. - -101.

• Answer: New detail is issued for domestic water tie-in.

• Q35. What is the existing pipe material of the domestic hot and cold water on drawing PP-101?

• Answer: Type “L” copper

• Q36. On drawing PP-101, RCP-2, the domestic hot water recirculation pump is located in the mechanical room. Cannot find a piping detail of the pipe on any drawing. Please advise on how they are to be piped

• Answer: New detail is issued for domestic water re-circulation pump piping.

• Q37. On Drawing P-502, Waste and Vent Isometric does not continue the 3" vent from the floor drain located in room 5136 Mechanical Fire Riser room. Please complete the connection of the vent on Drawing PP-102.

• Answer: Drawing P-502 has been revised.

40.) Question:

• Q1. Box 13a of the Solicitation requires an original and 4 copies of the offer. Section 00113 page 5 para. 2, requires Vol. 1 in original only. Please clarify

• Answer: You will need to submit a total of 4(four) sets of Volume II, original and three copies.

Volume I is only one set.

• Q2. Please advise the amount of the Bid Guarantee. (% of bid or lump sum)

• Answer: FAR Clause is 52.228-1 is included in Section 0700 in the RFP package. Although only included by reference, the bid guarantee amount is 20% of the bid price or $3M, whichever is less.

• Q3. Section 01.11.00 page 3 para1.6. We are assuming the regular work hrs., 8am to 6pm, is a range within which to work, not a mandatory 10 hr. work day. Please confirm.

• Answer: The range of normal work hours is 8am-6pm. Contractors are able to work outside of these hours as long as coordinated with the COR and BFDF.

• Q4. Is a Building Permit required?

• Answer: Building Permit is not required. Note that permits form the Town of Batavia, NY for portable water and sanitary sewer connections are required.

• Q5. Section 03.30.00. What is the level of finish on the underside of the cast-in-place slabs exposed to view?

• Answer: Standard smooth formed is acceptable.

• Q6. Section 07.41.13 pages 9, 22 & 23. Is the non-structural warranty 5yr. or 20yr. Please clarify

• Answer: Warranty form lists 5 years, but section requires 20. Amend form to show 20 yr duration prior to submittal.

• Q7. Asphalt Shingles (07.31.13 page 2, para 1.5.2), Metal Roof Panels (07.41.13 page 9, para 1.8.3) and Metal Building Systems (13.34.19 page 29, para 3.14.3). Does the "contractor" warranty refer to the "installing contractor"?

• Answer: Contractor warranty refers to the General Contractor.

• Q8. Drawing A-451, key note and notes, refers to a drawing A-705. That drawing is not part of the Architectural set. Please clarify.

• Answer: Drawing list identifies A-530 as casework sections to which casework tags refer.

• Q9. Regarding Structural Steel Specification 1.4, 05-12-00, pg 4 calling for Fabricators to be AISC Certified. Several of the AISC Certified fabricators we have talked to are not interested in bidding due to the fact that there is only a minor amount of structural steel in the design. The light iron and misc steel fabricators in the area that are not AISC have declined our request to bid due to the certification requirements. Will requirement for AISC certification be waived due to the fact that there is essentially no structural steel construction involved?

• Answer: HDR will allow a waiver of the AISC requirement if fabricators show a 10-year record of successful work and Contracting Officer concurs.

• Q10. On Drawing C-122 referring to the notation ”SECURE PERIMETER FENCE; MATCH EXISTING” ; we are assuming all the fencing is relocated fence shown on Sheet C-112 . Please confirm New fence posts, hanger arms, barbed wire/ribbon, hardware, etc. will be required – match existing in size, thickness, gauge, shape, color, finish, and material. Reuse/relocate existing fence mesh/fabric which was removed during demolition. The following question was referred by a potential subcontractor: 12. After reviewing the project there appear to be conflicts on the roof and wall panel system we should be supplying.

The walls appear to be insulated panels with a minimum of 24 gage interior and exterior panels (13 34 19, section 2.4.1). However, the next section (13 34 19, section 2.4.2) it mentions 22 gage minimum and same width roof and wall panels. We would interpret that section as being for a single skin panel vs. an insulated panel. As for the roof, in 2 different sections (07 41 13, section

1.10 and 07 41 13, section 2.1.1) the requirement is 18 gage (very thick roof panel!).

However, the aforementioned section (13 34 19, section 2.4.2) indicates that roof and walls should be 22 gage. Please clarify what we are to bid. As an aside not many (if any) metal roof suppliers can roll form 18 gage material. On government work we have historically provided 24 gage or 22 gage material. Please advise.

• Answer: Wall Panels response: Interpretation of wall panels is incorrect. Drawings clearly indicate that wall panels are insulated units as shown in throughout the wall sections and details. Requirements for insulated wall panels are indicated in 13 34 19-2.4.1.

Roof system for metal building is detailed in drawing 6/A-523 as a composite system with integral insulation. Section 13 34 19 article 2.8.3 identifies section 07 21 13 for insulation. At Section 07 41 13 for metal roof panels, revise the sheet steel gage at paragraph 1.10 and sheet steel panel gage at paragraph 2.1.1 to 22 Ga.

41.) Question:

We respectfully submit the following discrepancies we have found. We are aware of the General Notes on the EY drawings. There is another note on drawing EY-001 under the security device list stating “provide back boxes and conduit only for security devices.” Please Advise. Section 011100 – 1.4.1 states the project description and includes security electronic devices. However the included submittal register only includes section 283164.00 10 – Fire Detection and Alarm System, Addressable. Are sections

282001.00 10 Electronic Security Systems and 282323.00 10 Closed Circuit Television Systems intentionally left out or are we to assume they will be included. Please advise.

Answer:

The electronic security devices WILL NOT be part of this bid. The bid shall include raceway (i.e. Conduit and back boxes) only.

42.) Question:

INFORMATION REQUIRED:

• Q1. Specification Section 01 11 00 - Summary of Work, paragraph 1.6 - Work hours, indicates work hours are 8 a.m. to 6 p.m. Specification goes on to state that contractor may start check-in at 6 a.m. How long should contractor anticipate that the check in and check out process will take each day? If contractor checks-in employees prior to 8 a.m., do employees need to wait until 8 a.m. to begin work?

• Answer: Work outside the restricted areas, i.e.: the new warehouse and gate areas, will not be time restricted as far as the Gov't is concerned. Check in to the facility will not be required.

Check in at the main gate will be necessary when the gate is being worked on for security purposes.

• Q2. Specification 01 14 00 - Work Restrictions, indicates to allow two weeks for processing identification badges. Please confirm that badges are only required for workers entering the secure perimeter and that the warehouse and guardhouse work does not require badged workers. Please also advise if delivery truck drivers who deliver materials into the security perimeter are exempt from this requirement?

• Answer: Only workers within the secured area will require a badge. This badge will be on their person at all times. Delivery personnel will be escorted and will not require a badge providing they leave the premises immediately after off loading there cargo. Proper ID will be required to pass through Sally Port gates.

• Q3. Special security requirements were discussed at the site visit regarding access to secure areas. One requirement discussed was the requirement for a tool inventory. Details on how this is to work cannot be found in the documents. Do tools have to be removed from within the security perimeter daily or can secured lockable job boxes be left inside and checked out only when no longer needed?

• Answer: Yes. Gang boxes are permitted. They are to be locked at all times when not be accessed. An inventory of the gang box is to be affixed to the inside cover and a copy with the escorting officers.

• Q4. Specification Section 01 14 00 - Work Restrictions, paragraph 1.3 - Special Scheduling Requirements, states that the SHU and Warehouse shall be ready for operation and approved before work can begin on the remaining buildings and renovation area. Please clarify the following phasing questions:

• a). Drawing G-004 calls the SHU work Phase 1A, New Warehouse 1B and Guardhouse 1C. Is the guardhouse work part of phase 1 with the SHU and Warehouse or can it not start until they are complete as indicated in Specification 01 14 00?

• Answer: Phasing of Guardhouse is independent of SHU and Warehouse. It can be started concurrently with 1A and 1B or started after.

• b). When reviewing the project scope during the site visit, The Phasing indicated on Drawing G-004 was explained to be Phase 1B prior to Phase 2, and Phase 1A prior to Phase 3 A/B. Is this correct, or do both Phase 1A and 1B need to be complete before either Phase 2 or Phase 3 A/B are started?

• Answer: Phase 1A must be substantially complete and operational before Phase 3 A/B begin.

Phase 1B must be substantially complete and operational before Phase 2 begins. There is no requirement that both 1A and 1B are complete before Phases 2 and 3 A/B begin.

• c). Does the Government have durations that must be accounted for in the overall schedule to allow relocation of existing operations into the new facilities prior to demolition and renovation proceeding?

• Answer: A minimum of 30 days shall be provided to relocate existing facilities to new space.

• Q5. Specification Section 22 00 00, paragraph 2.6.1 floor and shower drains states to provide drains with trap primer connections, trap primer and connection piping. Trap primer valves, piping and locations are not shown on the drawings. If trap primer valves and piping are a requirement, please provide revised drawings showing this scope.

• Answer: Trap primers need to be located in the secure chases in the SHU, and above the ceilings or within secure chases in areas 2, and 4.

• Q6. Given the short duration between the availability of the documents to the cut -offs for RFIs, we would like to request an extension of the RFI deadline.

• Answer: RFI’s will no longer be accepted.

• Q7. On Drawing PP-105, Area-2 Waste Piping is missing pipe sizes.

• Answer: Drawing has been revised to show sizing.

• Q8. On Drawing PP-105, Area 2 and 4, the existing pipe sizes are not given. Please revise.

• Answer: Drawing has been revised to show sizing.

• Q9. On Drawing PP-106, Area 2 and 4 is missing a lot of waste vent piping. Please revise drawing to show all piping.

• Answer: Drawing has been revised to show vent piping.

• Q10. The piping run outs to the VAVs on Drawing MP-101 -- are they 3/4 or 1/2 inch pipes?

Please advise and revise the documents.

• Answer: The branch piping serving the VVR's will be 3/4".

• Q11. There is a lot of saw cutting of the floors slabs in Area 2 and 4 for demo and new work.

What are the structural elements of area 2 and 4 slabs on grade?

• Answer: According to the existing building drawings, the existing slab on grade is 152 mm thick with two layers of WWR. Where trenching for utilities, replacement slab shall match existing.

43.) Question:

a. The Solicitation (SF 1442) states that an original and four (4) copies of the Technical Proposal are required. Page 5 of the Solicitation states that an original and three (3) copies are required. How many copies are required?

b. The Solicitation (SF 1442) also indicates that an offer guarantee (bid bond) is required. I do not see anywhere in the bid documents where the amount of the bid bond is specified. Is a bid bond required, and if so, what is the amount of the bid bond?

Answer:

a. We will need for you to submit a total of 4(four) sets of Volume II (Original and three copies).

b. FAR Clause is 52.228-1 is included in Section 0700 in the RFP package. Although only included by reference, the bid guarantee amount is 20% of the bid price or $3M, whichever is less.

44.) Question:

I am looking for a copy of the Geotech report that would go with this project.

I have seen it referenced to in the Specs but have not located it in the available documents.

Any help you could provide in this would be appreciated.

Posted to FBO site by USACE.

45.) Question:

Confirming our conversation from Thursday of last week, you advised that this project does not have a pre-approval request form which needs to be submitted. The review of the product information would be the basis on which the approval would be based. You indicated receipt of our product data but offered to check with your Technical Review group to see if they needed any additional information.

I had not heard back from you and wanted to make sure the information provided for consideration of Hope's Security Windows was sufficient.

Not Approved. Proposed system is not an equivalent.

46.) Question:

a. Spec section Div 10 – 10 10 00 specifies visual display boards which includes marker boards, tack boards, presentation boards, projection screen etc. We have been unable to locate on the drawings.

Please advise.

b. Solicitation page 105 of 145, para. 1.82 states that a SWPPP has been developed as part of this project. Spec. section 01 57 19.00 20 p.15 para. 3.2.2.1 states that the contractor shall submit a SWPPP.

Please clarify.

Answer:

a.Delete Section 10 10 00. Not Required.

b.SWPP has been submitted for the project, pending approval.

47.) Question:

I would like to bid the site furnishings to this project and am having a hard time finding everything on the plans. Is there any chance you have a quantity or locations in which I could find what I need.

Bicycle Rack as detailed on 5/C302. No other site furnishings.

48.) Question:

Q1. Doors G002 and G003 are scheduled to have half light glass (type G). These doors are for the toilet and closet in the guardhouse. Please confirm that these doors should be half light style.

Q2. Drawings A-401 through A-456 have a casework keynote which referring to A-705 for details.

Drawing A-705 was not issued with the documents. Please provide referenced drawing.

Q3. Drawing A-807, detail 1 & 2, indicate that the bunk should be welded to a 8x8x16"" steel block. A specification for the steel block cannot be found in specification 12 55 00. Please provide direction on where a specification for the steel block can be found or issue a specification for it.

Q4. Specification 12 55 00 - Detention Furniture and Equipment, paragraph 2.8 , Wall Hung Bunk is specified to be made of 10 GA steel sheet. Is this carbon or stainless steel? What grade?

Q5. Detail 2 on A-806 and Detail 6 on M-501, both appear provide details for security grilles / security air devices. Is either detail acceptable? Please clarify.

Q6. Detail 2 on A-806 is labeled ""security grille"" and is indicated to be a perforated steel plate.

Specification 12 55 00, paragraph 2.21 for detention barrier grilles call for vertical and horizontal bars.

Specification 05 50 13 paragraph 2.13 has differing requirements for security grilles. Is it the intent of the documents that bar grilles as specified in 12 55 00 to be used where ""security grilles"" are called for on M-101, 102, 111, 501 and A-806 at security level crossings and the perforated plate should be used for HVAC registers, grilles and diffusers at secure locations?

Q7. AS-100 defines the Security Level I and Level II wall perimeters. The drawing does not indicate what floors, ceilings, or roof assemblies are to be considered Level I or Level II. Please clarify.

Q8. Drawing A-809 provides details for the outdoor recreation area and woven rod barriers. There is no detention equipment specification for these barriers. Please confirm that these barriers are to be as provided as specified in specification section 05 50 13, paragraph 2.14 - Woven Rod Barrier.

Answer:

Q1. Sheet A-603: Door G002 & G003 shall be ""F""

Q2. Sheets A-401 thorugh A-456. Revise keynote 3 to reference A-530 in lieu of A-705.

Q3. Addressed in Addendum 1.

Q4. Steel Bunk per materials specified in 2.1

Q5. Provide detail 6/M-501

Q6. Details Shown on 1/A-806 are in conjunction with 12 55 00, Par. 2.21. Par. 2.13 in section 05 50 13 does not apply to details on 1/A-806.

Q7. Security levels defined as walls on AS-100 are floor to deck. Penetrations in horizontal elements are thus protected at the more stringent wall requirement for that room.

Q8. 05 50 13 - 2.14 Woven Rod Barrier is the correct specification."

49.) Question:

I'm not able to locate specification for the safety padding in cell S129. Please advise.

Included in Addendum 1

50.) Question:

Security hardware set SH-11 is called for sheet A-604 door schedule but is not listed in section 087163, page 18. Please advise.

Answer:

"SH-11 Type 7 Lock Mechanical spring lock for use on chase and access doors with the following features.

a. Mogul key operated one side only.

b. Five lever tumblers with spring temper brass/bronze springs.

c. Malleable iron case and cover.

d. Bolt retracted by key 25 by 12.7 mm with 11 mm one by 1/2 inch with 7/16 inch throw.

e. Lock case and cover primed for paint.

f. Mounting screws and strike.

Type A8192HT hinges - PC, SHS

51.) Question:

Is there any chance this bid can be pushed back one week? There is another very large project bidding at the same time as this.

The proposal due date has just been extended until 23 September 2011.

52.) Question:

The solicitation indicates that a bid bond is required but we do not find an amount or what form is needed. Can you clarify?

Answer:

FAR Clause is 52.228-1 is included in Section 0700 in the RFP package. Although only included by reference, the bid guarantee amount is 20% of the bid price or $3M, whichever is less.

53.) Question:

Can you clarify if Bid Option 009 is the same work shown on drawings AD-101 section 2 and drawing A- 102 section 2?

Answer:

Bid Option 009 includes the work listed in 2/AD-101. Bid Option 009 separates potential cost (if any) of performing all work in Phase 3 under separate sub-phases (3A & 3B) versus performing…