Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 34 KB Posted

Attached to
Self Awareness - Professional Development Training
Solicitation number
W912LN-17-T-0001
Issued by

About this file

Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Amendment_0002.pdf PDF
Self-Awareness_Q_and_A.pdf PDF
Amendment_0001.pdf PDF
Past_Performance_Questionnaire_Letter.pdf PDF
W912LN-17-T-0001_Self_Awareness_Training.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION (SEE FAR 3.104)

PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE FORM

Contractor:____________________ Contract No.:____________________________ Subcontract No. (if applicable):_________________________________ POC:________________________ Title:________________________ (Name) (E.G. PCO/ACO/TM) (Agency, Telephone No., E-mail Address & Fax Number)

The following questions pertain to the contractor’s record of past (within the past three years) and current performance. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of a federal contract. Therefore, it is important that our information be as factual and accurate as possible. Please provide examples and/or explanations (use additional pages if necessary). The following adjectival ratings shall be used in your response.

Outstanding: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Acceptable: Performance meets contractual requirements. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

Marginal: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective.

Unacceptable: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective.

PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)

A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

Contractor/Company Name/Division:

Address:

Program Identification/Title:

Contract Number:

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION (SEE FAR 3.104)

Contract Type:

Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):

Contract Award Date:

Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:

Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:

B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number:

Address:

E-mail Address:

PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent)

A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship

Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Good Acceptable Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

Comments:

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION (SEE FAR 3.104)

B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).

Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Good Acceptable Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

Comments:

C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.

Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Good Acceptable Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION (SEE FAR 3.104)

D. Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Estimated Costs (Use this Question on Cost Reimbursement Type Contracts Only).

Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Good Acceptable Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

Comments:

E. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest

Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Good Acceptable Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION (SEE FAR 3.104)

F. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.

G. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:

Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?

If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:

H. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:

Organization:

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number Address:

E-mail Address:

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION (SEE FAR 3.104)

PART III. RETURN INFORMATION

Please return this completed Questionnaire via e-mail to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter.

Thank you for your assistance.

Signature Date

Typed or Printed Name

ARMY
SOURCE SELECTION SUPPLEMENT (AS3)
TO THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE SOURCE SELECTION PROCEDURES
December 21, 2012
APPENDIX C__________________________SECURITY CONSIDERATIONS
CHAPTER 1: PURPOSE, ROLES, AND RESPONSIBILITIES
1.1 Purpose
1.2 Best Value Continuum – No Army Text
1.3 Applicability
1.4 Source Selection Team (SST) Roles & Responsibilities
Figure 1-4
Administrative Support Considerations

1.5 Program Management/Requirements Office Roles & Responsibilities – No Army Text

CHAPTER 2: PRE-SOLICITATION ACTIVITIES
2.1 Conduct Acquisition Planning
2.2 Develop a Source Selection Plan
Figure 2-5
Steps Involved in Formulating Evaluation Factors and Subfactors
2.3 Develop the Request for Proposals
Figure 2-6
Sample Tracking of Typical Acquisition Documents

2.4 Release the Request for Proposals – No Army Text

CHAPTER 3: EVALUATION AND DECISION PROCESS
3.1 Evaluation Activities
3.2 Documentation of Initial Evaluation Results
Addendum to Chapter 3 - Exchanges with Offerors
The PCO controls all exchanges with offerors. Before participating in any exchanges, the PCO shall review the ground rules with the team members.
3.3 Award without Discussions
3.4 Discussion Process
3.5 Final Proposal Revisions
3.6 Documentation of Final Evaluation Results
3.7 Conduct and Documentation of Comparative Analysis
3.8 Best-Value Decision
3.9 Source Selection Decision Document
3.10 Debriefings
CHAPTER 4: DOCUMENTATION REQUIREMENTS
CHAPTER 5: DEFINITIONS
APPENDIX A
APPENDIX B
Debriefing Guide
APPENDIX C
SECURITY CONSIDERATIONS
APPENDIX D
PERSONNEL CONSIDERATIONS
APPENDIX E
ORAL PRESENTATIONS AND PROPOSALS
APPENDIX F
USING CURRENT AND PAST PERFORMANCE
AS A SOURCE SELECTION FACTOR
APPENDIX G
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRES AND INTERVIEWS
APPENDIX H
SMALL BUSINESS PARTICIPATION
APPENDIX I
COST REALISM ANALYSIS
APPENDIX J
ON-LINE REVERSE AUCTIONS

APPENDIX K

Contractor
IGCE
Blank Page
Blank Page

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .