SF 30 W912L9-25-Q-0001 Amend 1.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

This Amendment allow s the vendor to provide more information if the answ er to section (IV) (b.) of clause 52.212-1 ADDENDUM is "NO".

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 11

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 27-Dec-2024

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street , County, State and Zip Code) X W912L925Q0001

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

16-Dec-2024

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

27-Dec-2024

CODE

USPFO FOR INDIANA-CAMP ATTERBURY

BLDG 244 EGGLESTON RD

EDINBURGH IN 46124

W912L9 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W912L925Q0001

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

The following have been modified:

52.212-1 ADDENDUM

FAR 52.212-1 ADDENDUM

I. QUOTE SUBMISSION INSTRUCTION

Submission Due Date. The offeror must ensure its quote, in its entirety, reaches the required destination before the date and time set for closing of the solicitation. The submission due date for this solicitation is (See block 6 and 8 of the SF 1449).

Submission. The quote submitted in response to this solicitation shall be formatted as stated below and furnished electronically to ROBERT.W.MARSZALEK.CIV@ARMY.MIL and

SHERI.R.HERRIN.CIV@ARMY.MIL

The Government office designated for receipt of the proposal is the email inbox of the addressee indicated above. Notwithstanding the provisions at FAR 52.212-1(f) or FAR 52.215-1(c)(3), delivery is not accomplished until the addressee can open the email; delivery to a server or an email inbox on a server is not considered delivery to the designated Government office and the quotation is not under the Government’s control until the addressee can open the email. The email shall not be considered to be delivered unless the entire content of the email and all attachments can be read by the addressee indicated above. Receipt of an electronic acknowledgment from the addressee establishes that a record was received but does not establish that the content sent corresponds to the content received. Email attachments are limited to no more than 2MB. Offerors are specifically warned that email may be subjected to spam filters or attachment stripping.

Robert or Sheri will send you a “received” e mail in response to the submittal of your quote. If you do not receive a reply e mail from Robert or Sheri, then we did NOT receive your quote and you must contact us right away before the deadline specified in Block 8.

Quote Compliance. The Government must have received from the offeror a fully compliant quote. The quote is compliant when it conforms to all of the requirements, terms, and conditions of the solicitation, including the Performance Work Statement (PWS).

Quote Retention. In accordance with FAR Subpart 4.8, Government Contract Files, the Government will retain one copy of all unsuccessful quotes.

Single Quote Submission. FAR 52.212-1 is hereby tailored to remove subparagraph (e) which does not apply to this solicitation. Offerors are limited to submitting one quote with one approach to meeting all the requirements of this solicitation. Quotes that contain alternative terms and conditions will be considered as taking exception to the requirements of the solicitation.

All or None. FAR 52.212-1(h) is hereby tailored for this solicitation: Offers in response to this solicitation must be submitted for all the requirements identified in the solicitation. Offers submitted for less than all the requirements called for by this solicitation may be rejected or ineligible for award.

II. QUOTE FORMAT

The acceptable electronic formats for quotes shall be compatible with MS Office, specifically MS Word; PDF format is acceptable. All volumes shall be electronic files and not be password protected. The use of this solicitation (SF 1449) and the pricing matrix is the recommended format for quotes. Handwritten answers ARE authorized.

III. QUOTE OFFER SUMMARY

Please fill in boxes below. Handwritten answers ARE acceptable.

3.3.1 Solicitation Number +

acknowledgement of any amendments to this RFQ

W912L9-25-Q-0001 Amendment #1

3.3.2 Date Submitted

3.3.3 Offerors Business name

3.3.4 Offeror’s address and CAGE

code.

3.3.5 Offerors own name and

contact information (For quote point of contact).

Please include a phone number.

3.3.6 All proposed subcontractor(s)

(if applicable)

3.3.7 Address and CAGE code for

each proposed subcontractor (if applicable)

3.3.8 Quote Acceptance Period 30 Days

IV. FACTOR ii Technical Capability:

The National Guard has a dual federal-state mission that is unique to the U.S. military, and which sets it apart from any other reserve component. Because of the importance of National Security, maintaining combat readiness, sanitation, mitigating outside threats, and other such things attributed to the mission of the National Guard, the Indiana National Guard has determined that only commercial sanitation companies, that have been in business a minimum of three (3) years, as of the date of issuance of this solicitation, are eligible for award.

You must answer the following questions: (Handwritten answers ARE acceptable

a. Prime Contractor currently has NAICS code 562991-Septic Tank and Related Service, listed in their SAM registration under Clause 52.219-1 section (c) Representations. NOTE prime contractor is NOT eligible for this award if answer is

NO.

YES OR NO

b. Prime Contractor has continuously operated under the description of NAICS code 562991-Septic Tank and Related Service for at least (3) years as of the date of issuance of this solicitation. Provide separate explanation if answer is no.

YES OR NO

c. Prime Contractor or subcontractor has, in their possession, at least one pumper truck with the capability to pump at least 325 gallons of waste.

YES OR NO

d. Prime Contractor or subcontractor has, in their possession, at least one vehicle to transport latrines and hand wash stations with 1,000 lbs. Hydraulic Lift Gate Toilet Carrier OSHA Requirement to prevent injury.

YES OR NO

e. Prime Contractor or subcontractor has access to at least 700 portable latrines per year as described in the PWS.

YES OR NO

f. Prime Contractor or subcontractor has access to at least 200 hand wash stations per year per as described in the

PWS.

YES OR NO

V. FACTOR iii Past Performance:

The offeror shall submit two (2) REFERENCES minimum, that were performed by the offeror as the prime contractor, within three years of the date of issuance of this solicitation. Relevant contracts are those comparable in scope and magnitude of effort and complexity to the PWS requirement(s).

REFERENCE #1

Provide the name of a reference for which you provided rental services within the last 3 years.

Provide the address of the location where you provided the services.

Provide a contact phone number and or e-mail address of the reference for which you provided services to.

Contract period of performance of the reference for which you provided services to.

Brief description of type of service such as portable toilet rental, hand wash station rental, removal of greywater material.

REFERENCE #2

Provide the name of a reference for which you provided rental services within the last 3 years.

Address

Contact phone number and or e-mail address.

Contract period of performance

Brief description of type of services provided

VI. FACTOR i Price:

The Prices proposed shall be inclusive of all charges for transportation, except during authorized Emergency services, and all requirements found in the PWS such as supplies. Prices shall not include Federal, State or Local taxes. The Governments tax exemption certificate is available.

Offers shall submit pricing on the “Consolidated Price list” provided.

NG Protest Program National Guard Agency Protest Program is intended to encourage interested parties to seek resolution of their concerns with the National Guard (NG) as an Alternative Dispute Resolution forum, rather than filing a protest with the Government Accountability Office (GAO) or other external forum.

Contract award or performance is suspended during the protest to the same extent, and within the same time periods as if filed at the GAO. The NG protest decision goal is to resolve protests within 35 calendar days from filing. An agency protest may be filed with either the Contracting Officer or the NG Agency’s Protest Decision Authority, but not both, in accordance with NG protest procedures.

To be timely, the protests must be filed with the periods specified in FAR 33.103. To file a protest under the NG Agency Protest Program, the protest must request resolution under that program and be sent to the address below:

National Guard Bureau Office of the Director of Acquisitions/ Head of Contracting Activity

ATTN: NGB-AQ-O

111 S. George Mason Dr.

Arlington, VA 22204 Email: ng.ncr.ngb-arng.mbx.ngb-task-order-ombudsman@mail.mil All other agency-level protests should be sent to the Contracting Officer for resolution at the address in the solicitation. See FAR clause 52.233-2.

NG Public-facing, general Protest information is found at:

https://www.nationalguard.mil/Leadership/Joint-Staff/Special-Staff/Director-of-Acquisitions/ Directorate of Acquisitions information for the contracting enterprise is found at https://gko.portal.ng.mil/ngb/STAFF/D01/D01/OI/Protests%20and%20Complaints/Forms/AllIte ms.aspx

(End of provision)

52.212-2 ADDENDUM

52.212-2 ADDENDUM

BASIS OF AWARD- EVALUATION

I. Basis for Contract Award – Evaluation of Offers-Simplified Acquisition Procedures

(a) In accordance with FAR 13.106 and FAR subpart 13.5, the Government will award a five-year ordering period indefinite delivery indefinite quantity (IDIQ) firm fixed price (FFP) contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose proposal conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following shall be used to evaluate offers:

(i) Price

(ii) Technical; and

(iii) Past performance

(b) Options. Options under FAR clause 52.217-8 will be evaluated by using the prices offered for the last ordering period to determine the price for a 6-month extension, which will be added to the five-year ordering period to arrive at a total evaluated price. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

II. Proposal Evaluation: The evaluation process will be accomplished as follows:

A. General: The government intends to make award to the responsible offer who represents the best value to the Government based on (i) Price fair and reasonableness; (ii) Technical capability that has answered “Yes” to the questions shown below. (iii) Past Performance that is Recent, relevant and has a satisfactory or better confidence rating. The government will first evaluate price, and then evaluate the lowest price proposal for acceptability under (ii) technical capability and Recent, relevant and has a satisfactory or better confidence rating under (iii) past performance. If the lowest-price offeror is evaluated as unacceptable, the agency will then consider the acceptability of the next lowest price offer, continuing this process as necessary.

B. PRICE: The government will evaluate your price based on price reasonableness in accordance with FAR 13.106-3(a).

a. Offers shall submit pricing on the “Consolidated Price list” provided.

b. If “Consolidated Price list” is not used no further evaluation will be done.

C. FACTORS TO BE EVALUATED:

FACTOR ii- Technical Capability: The Government will evaluate whether the represented company has answered YES to the following questions:

a) Does the prime contractor currently have NAICS code 562991 - Septic Tank and Related Service, listed in their SAM registration under Clause 52.219-1 section (c) Representations?

b) Has the prime contractor continuously operated under the description of NAICS code 562991- Septic Tank and Related Service for at least (3) years as of the date of issuance of this solicitation?

If answer is no, did prime contractor provide a separate explanation?

c) Does the prime contractor or subcontractor have, in their possession, at least one pumper truck with the capability to pump at least 325 gallons of waste?

d) Does the prime contractor or subcontractor have, in their possession, at least one vehicle to transport latrines and hand wash stations with 1,000 lbs. Hydraulic Lift Gate (Toilet Carrier OSHA Requirement) to prevent injury?

e) Does the prime contractor or subcontractor have access to at least 700 portable latrines per year as described in the PWS?

f) Does the prime contractor or subcontractor have access to at least 200 hand wash stations per year per as described in the PWS?

FACTOR iii- Past Performance: Past Performance is a measure of the degree to which you have satisfied your customers in the past and complied with federal, state, and local laws and regulations. Your past performance is relevant to this competition when you have done recent work that has confronted you with the same kinds of challenges that you would reasonably expect to encounter during performance of the contract described by the RFP. We will assess your past performance on the basis of recency, relevancy, and quality. Past performance information may be obtained from any sources available to the Government

(CPARS)(SAM).

First, we will evaluate recency. For purposes of this evaluation, recency is defined as demonstrated experience (active or completed efforts) performed within the past three (3) years from the issuance date of this solicitation. Second, we will evaluate recent contracts for relevancy as described below. Third, we will evaluate relevant contracts for overall quality.

The evaluation of the Offeror’s (including partnerships and joint venture) present/past performance WILL NOT include the present/past performance of any subcontractors, predecessor companies, affiliates, other divisions or corporate management even though they may perform major or critical aspects of this requirement. Only the Offeror's (includes partnerships and joint ventures) past performance will be evaluated.

Past Performance Evaluation Ratings: As a result of the recency and relevancy assessments of current and prior contracts, a relevancy rating described below will be assigned within the past performance evaluation.

Table 1 – Used to evaluate Relevancy

Adjectival Rating Description Relevant Experience evidence involved same/similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Somewhat Relevant

Experience evidence involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant Experience evidence involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Scope = Type of Work, Functions, Skill Mix and/or Labor Classifications, etc.

Magnitude of effort = Dollar Value and Period of Performance

Complexities = Contract Type (e.g., Indefinite Delivery Contract, Firm-Fixed-Price, FAR-based, Other Government Transaction, UCC), Location (on-base, off-base, geographical), Terms and Conditions (e.g., private, Federal, DoD, Army, National Guard Bureau), etc.

Table 2 – Used to evaluate Quality

Adjectival Rating Description Substantial Confidence Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the Offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the Offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Neutral Confidence No recent/relevant performance record is available or the Offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can reasonably be assigned. The Offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance.

Limited Confidence Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has low expectation that the Offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

No Confidence Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the Offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

(End of Addendum)

(End of Summary of Changes)