W912JB10R4004 Q A 27May2010.pdf
PDF 62 KB Posted
- Attached to
- SOLICITATION Selfridge ANGB MATOC - Indefinite Delivery-Indefinite Quantity NAICS 236220 and 237990
- Solicitation number
- W912JB10R4004
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Pending QA 17 June 2010.pdf | ||
| W912JB10R4004 Q A 17Jun2010.pdf | ||
| W912JB10R4004 Q A 17Jun2010 Updated Pending.pdf | ||
| W912JB10R4004 Q A 16Jun2010.pdf | ||
| W912JB10R4004 Q A 15Jun2010.pdf | ||
| REVISED MATOC EXHIBIT E Jan 09.docx | DOCX document | |
| W912JB10R4004 Q A 11Jun2010.pdf | ||
| 10-R-4004 MATOC Conformed Copy 2.pdf | ||
| Amendment 0003.pdf | ||
| W912JB10R4004 Q A 4Jun2010.pdf | ||
| Important Info regarding the DD 2345.pdf | ||
| Amendment 0002.pdf | ||
| 10-R-4004 MATOC Conformed Copy.pdf | ||
| W912JB10R4004 QA 27May2010 | — | |
| SANGB MATOC Pre-Proposal Conference.pptx | PPTX presentation | |
| Pre Performance Conference Attendance Sheet.pdf | ||
| Amendment 0001.pdf | ||
| W912JB-10-R-4004 MATOC.pdf | ||
| set-aside Exhibit E-1 corrected.docx | DOCX document | |
| MATOC EXHIBIT E Jan 09.docx | DOCX document | |
| MATOC EXHIBITS A-D F and G Jan 09_corrected.docx | DOCX document | |
| A-4 Sources Sought Info Req Form UF Jan 10.docx | DOCX document |
Show all 22
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
W912JB10R4004
Questions and Answers
27 May 2010
Q1. Can you give examples of possible design build projects/TO’s?
A1. Pending
Q2. Is there opportunity for Engineering (Elect) design in this package?
A2. Pending
Q3. Do joint ventures & teaming have to be pre‐approved? If so, by what agency?
A3. Pending
Q4. Some small businesses may not have six (6) general construction projects. Can we utilize subcontractors past performance experiences? OR would we be disqualified if we provide fewer than six
(6) past performance experiences?
A4. Pending
Q5. Past performance: requiring six (6) past performance. Relevancy questionnaires are generally required for “large” competitors and three (3) for small. Will the government reduce the amount of past performance questionnaires from six (6) to three (3)?
A5. Pending
Q6. As part of the DB option, does the A/E have to submit past performance survey as part of the
SF330?
A6. Pending
Q7. What contracting decisions were made based on the sources sought submittals?
A7. Pending
Q8. Would architect/engineering firms be allowed to submit on their own (ie without being part of a design‐build team) for evaluation for design‐build work? Meaning they could be awarded a contract for design whenever task orders require design‐build.
A8. Pending
Q9. Is the prototypical project – CE Admin Facility a design‐build project?
A9. Pending
Q10. If we are in a joint partnership with a company, does either company fill out exhibit “B”?
A10. Pending
Q11. If we are in a joint partnership can the evals & past experience be a combination from the joint partnership or do they have to be from just one company?
A11. Pending
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .