ATTACHMENT 2 PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONAIRE.docx
DOCX document 278 KB Posted
- Attached to
- FULL FOOD SERVICE IDIQ-CANCELLATION Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- W912JA20R0005
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| SF 1449_W912JA20R00050002.docx | DOCX document | |
| Cancellation of Solicitation W912JA20R0005.docx | DOCX document | |
| ATTACHMENT 4 PWS_PRS.pdf | ||
| ATTACHMENT 1 SCA WD 15-4588 REV.12.txt | TXT text file | |
| SF 1449_W912JA-20-R-0005-0001.pdf | ||
| ATTACHMENT 3 PRICE MODEL.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
USPFO Alabama Purchasing & Contracting Office Past Performance Questionaire Name
Phone
Contracting Office Information:
Contracting Office Organization :
Contracting POC:
Contracting POC Phone:
Contracting POC email
Evaluated Contractor:
Contractor Name:
Contractor Phone:
Contractor Address:
Contractor Cage/DUNS:
Contract Information:
Contract Number:
TO/DO (if applicable):
Contract Period of Performance:
Contract Administrative Evaluation (non-numeric evaluation):
1. What is the period of performance of this contract?
2. What is the status of the contract (closed, open, terminated, etc.)?
3. What type of contract was used (FFP, etc.)?
4. How many Full Time Equivalents (FTE) are contracted?
5. Has there been unsatisfactory performance resulting in additional cost, scheduling issues or other?
5a. Please provide details:
6. Was a cure notice, other notices, or other corrective action issued or taken by the government?
6a. Please provide details:
7. Would you contract with this company again?
Rating Information:
Using the rubric and number values below, rate the contractor’s performance relating to the contract referenced above.
| Rating |
| Criteria |
| Excellent = 5 |
| Performance is at a very low risk: It meets all contractual |
requirements, and exceeds the majority of requirements.
| Very Good = 4 |
| Performance is at a low risk: It meets all contractual |
requirements, and exceeds some but less than half of requirements.
| Meets Expectations = 3 |
| Performance is at an acceptable risk: It meets all contractual |
requirements.
| Marginal = 2 |
| Performance is at a high risk: It does not meet less than half of |
contractual requirements. The contractor has implemented corrective action, but the corrective action was ineffective on the majority of deficiency; or the contractor has not implemented any corrective action.
| Needs Significant Improvement = 1 |
| Performance is at a very high risk: It does not meet the majority |
of contractual requirements. The contractor may or may not have implemented corrective action.
| Not Observed or Unknown = 0 |
| Contractor has no past performance on which to base any |
evaluation or the contractor’s capabilities were not observed respective to the requirement.
| Not Applicable = N/A |
| The question does not pertain to the evaluated performance. |
Contract Performance Evaluation:
Schedule or Timeliness of Performance
1. The contractor provided the FTE as per the contract.
5 4 3
2 1 0
N/A
2. The contractor demonstrated the ability to replace FTE, lost due to turnover, in a timely manner.
5 4 3
2 1 0
3. The contractor met compliance, reliability, and timeliness standards for this contract.
5 4 3
2 1 0
4. Please rate the overall schedule or timeliness of performance.
5 4 3
2 1 0
Quality of Service
1. The contractor consistently complied with the performance work statement for this contract.
5 4 3
2 1 0
2. The contractor managed their obligations under the contract such that personnel met expected qualifications, personnel maintained a high level of professionalism in both appearance and performance, and that performance issues were addressed and corrected.
5 4 3
2 1 0
3. Please rate the overall quality of this contractor and the service or performance under this contract.
5 4 3
2 1 0
Business Relations
1. The contractor was quick to respond to any and all issues or deviations to the contract or PWS.
5 4 3
2 1 0
2. The contractor invoiced using appropriate systems and in a timely manner.
5 4 3
2 1 0
3. The contractor consistently worked well with the government and showed concern for the mission for which the contract was established.
5 4 3
2 1 0
4. Please rate the overall business relations with this contractor.
5 4 3
2 1 0
Management of Key Personnel
1. Contractor’s key personnel were identified and available to support this contract.
5 4 3
2 1 0
2. Please rate the contractor’s overall management of key personnel
5 4 3
2 1 0
Comments Please provide comments, you may feel are appropriate, for any scores that are anything other than a 3 (Meets Expectations) or continue with details for any of the questions above in the space below:
Signature:
Date:
Typed Name:
Organization:
image1.png image2.png
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .