B08 Solicitation Amendment W912HZ26QA0270001 SF 30_15Jul2026.pdf

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER.

If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

Previous edition unusable STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016) Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

Solicitation/Contract Form Continuation

The following changes have been made:

INFORMATION FROM TO

Response Due Time

02:00 PM 12:00 PM

Response Due Date

17 Jul 2026 20 Jul 2026

List of Contract Documents, Exhibits, or Attachments

The attachments table has changed from:

Identifie r

Document Name

Document Description Reference Identifier

Date Line Item Page N umbers

Docum ent Type

Provide d Under Separat e Cover

0001 Attachment 01

- Pricing Schedule

Pricing Schedule 03 Jun 2026 Attach ment

No

0002 Attachment 02

- Past Performance Questionnaire

Past Performance Questionnaire 03 Jun 2026 Attach ment

No

To:

Identifie r

Document Name

Document Description Reference Identifier

Date Line Item Page N umbers

Docum ent Type

Provide d Under Separat e Cover

0001 Attachment 01

- Pricing Schedule

Pricing Schedule 03 Jun 2026 Attach ment

No

0002 Attachment 02

- Past

Past Performance Questionnaire 03 Jun 2026 Attach ment

No

W912HZ26QA0270001

Performance Questionnaire

Addendum to Evaluation - Commercial Product and Commercial Services

Miscellaneous text in this section has been modified to:

Section M - Evaluation Factors for establishing BPA

1.0 OVERVIEW

The Government will evaluate the quote in accordance with the evaluation factors stated in this solicitation. The evaluation factors in this solicitation are described herein using the evaluation rating systems outlined for selection procedures.

2.0 BASIS OF ESTABLISHING BPAs

In accordance with the Class Deviation - Revolutionary Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Overhaul Part 12, Defense FAR Supplement (DFARS) Part 212 (2026-O0028) this requirement will follow the simplified procedures associated with the acquisition of commercial products and commercial services. The Government will consider suppliers whose past performance has shown them to be dependable, who offer quality supplies or services at consistently lower prices, and who have provided numerous purchases at or below the simplified acquisition threshold. BPAs will be established with offerors the Government determines will be able to accomplish the necessary work in the manner most advantageous to the Government and whose offers represents the best value to the Government, after considering all factors, including evaluated cost. Best value tradeoff means the expected outcome of an acquisition that, in the Government's evaluation, provides the greatest overall best value in response to the requirement. BPAs will be established based on the overall best value quotations determined to be the most beneficial to the Government. BPAs will not be established with any contractor unless the contractor's combined technical rating is acceptable or higher. The Government plans to award around 3-5 Blanket Purchase Agreements based on the evaluation factors listed in this document. Quotes will be evaluated utilizing the following evaluation procedures and factors:

EVALUATION PROCUEDURES:

Factor I - Technical and Factor II - Past Performance are of equal importance and when combined are significantly more important than Factor III - Price.

The Government intends to select multiple contractors for establishing BPAs for this effort. For the purpose of establishing BPAs, the government shall evaluate offers based on the evaluation factors described below:

3.0 Evaluation Factors

Factor Location Description

FACTOR 1 VOLUME 1 Technical - Offerors shall describe their Corporate Capacity and Key Personnel.

FACTOR 2 VOLUME 2 Past Performance - Offeror shall demonstrate past performance.

FACTOR 3 VOLUME 3 Standard Form 1449 and pricing schedule (Reference Attachment 01).

The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:

I. FACTOR 1 - Technical Capability

The Offeror must submit evidence of its capability as specified in this solicitation. Contractors will be evaluated on the following.

Factor 1 - Subfactor 1: Corporate Capacity:

The Offeror's Corporate capacity will be evaluated on the offeror's demonstrated ability to execute BPA requirements. Corporate capacity shall be proven through providing the Blanket Purchase Call Execution Plan which shall include the standard operating procedures for BPA Call request for quotes through final delivery of supplies. Contractor shall also provide Relevant Experience for requirements similar in size and scope as this requirement. Contractors that demonstrate relevant experience and capacity to execute BPA requirements will be judged more favorably

Factor 1 - Subfactor 2: Key Personnel

a. Chief Executive Officer/President: Experience managing a company and providing quality supplies, meeting delivery requirements, and history of responsiveness for numerous purchases at or below the simplified acquisition threshold similar in size and scope to this requirement.

b. Procurement Specialist: Experience purchasing quality supplies, meeting delivery requirements, and history of responsiveness for numerous purchases at or below the simplified acquisition threshold similar in size and scope to this requirement. Contractors that demonstrate they can provide personnel experienced with BPA requirements will be evaluated more favorably.

FACTOR 1 TECHNICAL CAPABILITY RATING SYSTEM AND DEFINITIONS

Technical Factors Rating.

TABLE 1 - COMBINED TECHNICAL/RISK RATINGS

Rating Description

Exceeds Quote exceeds the baseline requirements, demonstrating exceptional corporate capacity or key personnel experience that provides direct mission benefit.

Meets Quote meets the baseline requirements and demonstrates adequate capacity/experience

Does Not Meet Quote fails to meet the baseline requirements; unawardable.

II. Factor 2 - Past Performance

To demonstrate past performance, the Offeror shall provide past performance that has shown them to be dependable, offer quality supplies at consistently lower prices, and who have provided numerous purchases at or below the simplified acquisition threshold. These must have been completed within five (5) years from the date of this solicitation, include references, with names and contact information of the references who can verify such past performance.

New Corporate Entities -- New corporate entities may submit data on prior relevant and recent contracts (within the last 3 calendar years) involving its officers and employees. However, in addition to the other requirements in this section, the Offeror shall discuss in detail the role performed by such persons in the prior contracts cited. Past performance information on work for state and local governments, private sector clients, and subcontractors that are similar to the Government requirement will be evaluated equally with similar federal contracts. Offeror may submit information on key personnel, major subcontractors, and work performed as part of a team or joint venture and other previous reincarnation of its current organization.

In addition to the above, the Government may review any other sources of information for evaluating past performance. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), including Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), using all CAGE/DUNS numbers of team members (partnership, joint venture, teaming arrangement, or parent company /subsidiary/affiliate) identified in the offeror's proposal, inquiries of owner representative(s), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), and any other known sources not provided by the offeror. While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the Offeror.

a. Past Performance Evaluation. There are two aspects to the past performance evaluation. The first is to evaluate the offeror's past performance to determine how relevant a recent effort accomplished by the offeror is to the effort to be acquired. In establishing what is relevant for the acquisition, consideration should be given to those aspects of an offeror's contract history that would give the greatest ability to measure whether the offeror will satisfy the current requirement.

b. The second aspect of the past performance evaluation is to determine how well the contractor performed on the contracts. The past performance evaluation performed in support of a current source selection does not establish, create, or change the existing record and history of the offeror's past performance; rather, the past performance evaluation process gathers information from customers on how well the offeror performed on those past contracts.

The Government's assessment will focus on contracts that meet the following conditions:

Recency. Only contracts completed within five (5) years from the date of this solicitation will be considered.

Relevancy. Only contracts which were/are relevant in size and scope of work will be considered.

The Government will examine the Offeror's record of satisfying customer requirements, including consideration of the Offeror's:

1. Technical performance, including technical performance, staffing, subcontractor management, quality control, safety, and commitment to customer satisfaction as evidenced by reasonable and cooperative behavior.

2. Cost Controls. Record of containing and forecasting costs on previously performed contracts.

3. Schedule. Record of adherence to contractual schedules.

The Government will use data provided in the Offeror's quote and data obtained from other sources. The Offeror is cautioned that while the Government will consider data from other sources, the burden of demonstrating satisfactory past performance rests with the Offeror. In the case of an Offeror without a record of recent and/or relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available, the Offeror will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance, providing the Offeror supplies a certified statement with their offer that no past performance information is available.

The Government will evaluate the recency, relevancy, and the offeror's past performance record to assess the Government's confidence in their ability to successfully execute the BPA.

The Government will assign a single, simplified of Confidence Assessment High Confidence, based on the recency (within 5 years) and Low Confidence, or Neutral/Unknown Confidence similarity of previous work.

TABLE 1 - COMBINED Past Performance RATINGS

Rating Description

High Confidence

Based on the offeror's recent and relevant performance record, the Government has an exceptionally high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

The offeror's history demonstrates consistent dependability, high-quality supply delivery, and proactive customer service on efforts of similar size and scope.

Low Confidence Based on the offeror's recent and relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort. The record features significant or recurring performance, delivery, or quality issues that were not proactively resolved by the contractor.

Neutral /Unknown Confidence

No recent or relevant performance record is available, or the offeror's performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. In accordance with FAR guidelines, a rating of "Neutral" shall not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably.

III. FACTOR 3 - PRICE

The contractor shall submit a completed Standard Form 1449 and pricing schedule (Reference Attachment 01). Each unit cost will be evaluated to determine price reasonableness for each item and for the overall quotation.

It is incumbent upon the offeror to submit sufficient information for the Government to determine technical capability and price. Failure to submit sufficient information will cause rejection of the entire quotation.

To be considered acceptable for award, an offer must demonstrate the offeror's capability for meeting calls at each location listed in the Solicitation, Continuation of Description, section 6.0 Location and Descriptions of Facilities. Offers that do not affirmatively demonstrate capability for meeting calls at each location will not be considered acceptable.

By submission of an offer pursuant to this solicitation, the Offeror agrees that the capability presented in the quotation becomes a contract requirement upon establishment of BPAs. No changes, substitutions, or deviations from the accepted quotation may be made without the approval of the Contracting Officer. You, as the Offeror, agree that the explicit capability presented in your quotation shall be provided under this contract at the stated price.

ERDC CONTRACTING OFC, 3909 HALLS FERRY ROAD

VICKSBURG, MS 39180-6199

UNITED STATES

ANNA CRAWFORD, EMAIL: ANNA.CRAWFORD@USACE.ARMY.MIL TELEPHONE: (601) 634-5320

AdminBy:

SCD: PAS: