Preproposal Conf Slides_W912HV26RA009 DESC2103C Fuel Tank.pdf

Prepared by: 製作者 ：

Project Manager （プロジェクトマネジャー） Sean Higginbotham ショーン · ヒギンボッサム

Project Engineer （プロジェクトエンジニア） Justin Sakamoto ジャスティンン · サカモト

Technical Lead （技術リード） Michael Teller マイケル · テラー

Contracting Officer （契約官） Ryan Marzetta ライアン · マーチェッタ

Contract Specialist （契約専門官） Jiro Miyairi 宮入 二朗

DESC2103C - BULK FUEL STORAGE TANKS PHASE II

YOKOTA AIR BASE, JAPAN

SOLICITATION #: W912HV26RA009

PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE

DATE: 10 SEPTEMBER 2026

横田基地における燃料貯蔵タンク建設工事 フェーズ２

公示番号： W912HV26RA009

入札前会議 日時：2026年9月10日

本プレゼンテーションに含まれる見解、意見及び所見は著者のものであり、他の公的な書類で指定されていない場合、公式な米陸軍省の見解、方針又は決定と 解釈されるべきではありません。

If there is any conflict between the information discussed during this conference and the solicitation, the terms and conditions of the solicitation will govern.

WELCOME

歓 迎

Virtual Roll Call 実質的な参加者の点呼

Your Company name will be called. Please have one representative from your company identify themselves and identify who is on the line.

会社名をお呼びしましたら代表の方が今回参加されている全員の方のお名前をお伝えく ださい。

Introduction of Government Personnel 米政府関係者紹介

USACE, Japan Engineer District 米陸軍工兵隊・日本地区 discussed during this conference and the solicitation, the terms and conditions of the solicitation will govern.

DISCUSSION OVERVIEW

説明会概要

Rules of Conference 説明会のルール

Quick Tips for Solicitations 入札公告の参考情報

Contracting Requirements 契約要件

Site Location 工事現場所在地

Project Scope 工事内容

General Construction Requirements 全般的工事要件 discussed during this conference and the solicitation, the terms and conditions of the solicitation will govern.

Conference will be presented in English. The Japanese translation is provided as a courtesy.

本会議は英語で行われる。日本語の翻訳は厚意によるものである。

Please keep phones on mute. 電話をミュートにすること。

Unofficial and non-binding 非公式で法的拘束力はない。

If there is any conflict between the information discussed during this conference and the solicitation, the terms and conditions of the solicitation will govern 当説明会で協議される情報と入札案内書に矛盾がある場合は、入札案内書の契約条件が優先さ れる。

All questions are to be submitted in writing via MS-Forms 質問/問合わせは全てMS-Formsを通じ書面で提出すること。

RULES FOR CONFERENCE

説明会のルール discussed during this conference and the solicitation, the terms and conditions of the solicitation will govern.

Review all the solicitation requirements 全ての入札要件を確認する。

Follow solicitation format as required 入札要件に指示されているフォーマットに従う。

Acknowledge all amendment(s) 全ての改訂（アメンドメント）を確認同意する。

Respond to every submission requirement 全ての提出要件に回答・対応する。

QUICK TIPS FOR ALL SOLICITATIONS

全ての入札公告に対する参考情報

RFP SOLICITATION FORMAT

フォーマット

If there is any conflict between the information discussed during this conference and the solicitation, the terms and conditions of the solicitation will govern.

Standard Form 1442 フォーム1442

Section 00 10 00, CLIN Schedule 契約項目一覧表

Section 00 21 16, POJ Supplemental Instructions 日本地区 補足説明

Section 00 22 00, Proposal Submission Requirements 入札書提出要件

Section 00 22 16, Evaluation Factors for Award 評価要素

Section 00 45 00, Representation and Certifications 表明と証明書

Section 00 70 00, Conditions of the Contract 契約条件

Section 00 72 00, General Conditions 一般条件

Section 00 73 00, Supplementary Conditions 補足条件

Division 01, General Requirements 一般要件

Divisions 02 thru 33, Technical Divisions 技術要件

Drawings 図面

Make sure to note the proposal due date and time in Block 13A of SF1442.

SF1442のブロック１３Aに記載された入札提出期日及び時間を必ず確認する。

Proposals due January 25, 2027 at 1400 hrs JST 入札書類の提出期限は日本時間の2027年1月25日、午後2時

Period for acceptance of proposals shall be no less than 120 calendar days for Government acceptance (see block 13D).

政府が受諾するための入札価格の有効期間は120日間以上とする。 （ブロック13D参照）

Fill out Blocks 14, 15, 17, 19, 20A, 20B, and 20C.

ブロック14, 15, 17, 19, 20A, 20B, 20Cにもれなく記入する。

STANDARD FORM (SF) 1442

If there is any conflict between the information discussed during this conference and the solicitation, the terms and conditions of the solicitation will govern.

CONTRACT LINE ITEM NUMBER (CLIN) SCHEDULE

契約項目一覧

SECTION 00 10 00

SOLICITATION, CONTRACT LINE ITEM NUMBER (CLIN) SCHEDULE

契約項目一覧

If there is any conflict between the information discussed during this conference and the solicitation, the terms and conditions of the solicitation will govern.

ITEM

NO.

SUPPLIES/SERVICE

詳 細

QUANTITY

数 量

UNIT

単位

UNIT

PRICE

単 価

AMOUNT

合 計

Construct Fuel Storage Tank and

Supporting Facility Systems 1 Job

Option Line Item

Installation of Automatic Tank Gauging, Level Transmitter /Temperature Probe (OPTION 1)

1 Job

契約項目一覧

If there is any conflict between the information discussed during this conference and the solicitation, the terms and conditions of the solicitation will govern.

NOTES 注記:

1. Failure of the offeror to propose prices for all items in the CLIN Schedule may be cause for rejection of the proposal as unacceptable. 契約項目一覧表の全ての項目に対し金額を提案 しない入札者は入札が認められない場合があります。

2. Any reference to “bid”, “bidder”, or “bidding schedule” shall be construed to mean “offer”, “offeror” and “CLIN schedule”. 「bid 」、「bidder 」、「bidding schedule」は「offer 入札」 「offeror 入札者」「CLIN schedule 入札一覧表」と解釈されるものとします。

3. See Section 01 20 00, for additional line item description. 追加の契約項目内容については セクション01 20 00を参照。

契約項目一覧

If there is any conflict between the information discussed during this conference and the solicitation, the terms and conditions of the solicitation will govern.

NOTES 注記:

4. The Government reserves the right to exercise option item(s) by written notice to the Contractor either singularly or in any combination, within ONE HUNDRED EIGHTY (180) calendar days of contract award of the Base Schedule at the prices stated in the CLIN Schedule. Completion of the added option(s) shall continue at the same schedule as the Base Schedule unless otherwise noted in Section 00 73 00, COMMENCEMENT, PROSECUTION AND COMPLETION OF WORK.

米政府は、契約項目一覧表の価格で基本契約の締結時から180日以内に、業者へ書面で通知す

ることによりオプション項目を任意の組み合わせで行使する権利を有します。追加オプションが行使 されても工事完了は、セクション00 73 00, 開始、施工、工事完了に記載が無ければ、基本契約と 同じ工期とします。

5. LEGEND 凡例: JB = Job 作業

SECTION 00 21 16

POJ SUPPLEMENTAL INSTRUCTIONS

日本地区 補足説明

If there is any conflict between the information discussed during this conference and the solicitation, the terms and conditions of the solicitation will govern.

Electronic delivery of proposals through PIEE Solicitation Module website – requires advance vendor registration on https://piee.eb.mil/. – see solicitation for specific instructions.

PIEEサイトを利用した電子的な入札（提案）書類の提出 – https://piee.eb.mil/.にて事前に業者登録をし ておく必要があります。 具体的な手順については入札案内書をご覧ください。

Magnitude of the Proposed Project: 工事の規模： ► ¥7,500,000,000 and ¥15,000,000,000 75億円から150億円 https://piee.eb.mil/

POJ SUPPLEMENTAL INSTRUCTIONS

日本地区 補足説明

If there is any conflict between the information discussed during this conference and the solicitation, the terms and conditions of the solicitation will govern.

Requests For Information (RFIs): ALL Questions / Inquiries shall be submitted via MS-Forms at:

https://forms.osi.apps.mil/r/GFTjcvnDK6 Please see the solicitation for additional details and instructions.

質問書（RFI)：全ての質問/問い合わせはMS-Formsのサイトhttps://forms.osi.apps.mil/r/GFTjcvnDK6 を介して提出して下さい。追加の詳細及び手順に関しては入札案内書を参照して下さい。

Requests For Information (RFIs) Due: RFI（質問書）期日： ► 11:59 (midnight) on 5 October 2026 (JST)

日本時間2026年10月5日 23：59 https://forms.osi.apps.mil/r/GFTjcvnDK6 https://forms.osi.apps.mil/r/GFTjcvnDK6

POJ SUPPLEMENTAL INSTRUCTIONS

日本地区 補足説明

If there is any conflict between the information discussed during this conference and the solicitation, the terms and conditions of the solicitation will govern.

SIGNATURE ON OFFERS. Offers must be signed by an officer of the company or an individual who is authorized to sign offers for and on behalf of the company. An individual, other than an officer of the company, who signs an offer must submit evidence of his authority to sign such offer. This evidence must accompany the offer. Failure to comply with this requirement may be cause for rejection of the offer.

入札書類の署名。 入札書類は、会社を代表して入札書類に署名する権限を持つ会社の役員又は個人が署名しな ければなりません。役員以外の個人が入札書類に署名する場合は、署名する権限があることを示す証拠を、入札 書類に添付して提出しなければなりません。この要件に従わない場合は、入札が却下される可能性があります。

JOINT VENTURE. In the event the offeror is a joint venture, the offer must be signed by an authorized representative of each participant in the joint venture. The joint venture as an entity shall also have an active System for Award Management (SAM) registration – See FAR 52.204-7 System for Award Management.

Failure to comply with this requirement may be cause for rejection of the offer.

合弁企業。 入札者が合弁企業である場合、入札書類は合弁企業の構成企業全てからの署名権限を持つ代表者

によって署名されなければなりません。合弁企業は、企業としてSAMの登録が有効でなければなりません。FAR

52.204-7、契約管理システム（SAM）を参照。この要件に従わない場合は、入札が却下される可能性があります。

14SECTION 00 21 16

POJ SUPPLEMENTAL INSTRUCTIONS

日本地区 補足説明

If there is any conflict between the information discussed during this conference and the solicitation, the terms and conditions of the solicitation will govern.

OFFEROR ELIGIBILITY.

a. This contract will be performed in its entirety in the country of Japan and is intended only for local sources.

Only local sources will be considered under this solicitation. Local sources are sources (e.g. corporations, partnerships, or Joint Ventures [For a Joint Venture, the Joint Venture as an independent entity must satisfy the local source requirements or, in the alternative, each member of the Joint Venture must individually satisfy the local source requirements]) that are physically located in Japan and authorized (i.e. licensed and registered) to perform construction in Japan. Specifically, a prospective offeror must be duly authorized to operate and conduct construction business in Japan and must fully comply with all applicable laws, decrees, labor standards, and regulations of Japan during the performance of the resulting contracts.

入札者資格。

a. 本契約は全て日本国内で施工され、日本の業者のみを対象としています。日本の業者のみが本入札の下で検討

されます。日本の業者とは、物理的に日本に所在し、日本で建設工事を行う権限を与えられた（すなわち、許可及び登 録された）業者（例えば、法人、パートナーシップ、又は合弁企業）を指します。合弁企業の場合、合弁企業が独立した 事業体として日本の要件を満たすか、又は代わりに合弁企業の全ての参加企業が個々に日本の要件を満たす必要 があります。具体的には、入札予定者は、日本で建設事業を運営し、実施するための正式な権限を有し、かつ、その 結果生じる契約の履行中、日本で適用されるすべての法律、政令、労働基準及び規制を完全に遵守しなければなりま せん。

15SECTION 00 21 16

POJ SUPPLEMENTAL INSTRUCTIONS

日本地区 補足説明

If there is any conflict between the information discussed during this conference and the solicitation, the terms and conditions of the solicitation will govern.

OFFEROR ELIGIBILITY. (cont.)

b. In addition, offerors must possess a Japanese civil construction (doboku isshiki koji) license or Japanese architectural construction (kenchiku isshiki koji) license by the proposal due date and time. The U.S.

Government will verify that the offeror has the license through the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (MLIT) website at https://etsuran2.mlit.go.jp/TAKKEN. It is the responsibility of the offeror to ensure that it has the license (Japanese civil construction or Japanese architectural construction), and that it is accurately shown on the MLIT website, by the proposal due date and time. Failure to comply with this requirement will be cause for rejection of your offer.

入札者資格（続き）

b. また、入札者は、入札書の提出期限までに、日本の土木一式工事許可又は建築一式工事許可を取得していなけ ればなりません。米政府は、国土交通省のホームページ（https://etsuran2.mlit.go.jp/TAKKEN）を通じて、入札者が

許可を取得していることを確認します。入札書の提出期限までに、入札者が許可（日本の土木工事又は日本の建築工 事）を持っていること、そして国土交通省のホームぺージ上でその許可証が正確に表示されていることを確認しておく ことは、入札者の責任です。国土交通省のホームぺージ上で許可証が確認できなかった場合は、入札を却下すること があります。

POJ SUPPLEMENTAL INSTRUCTIONS

日本地区 補足説明

If there is any conflict between the information discussed during this conference and the solicitation, the terms and conditions of the solicitation will govern.

JAPANESE CONSUMPTION TAX. By virtue of Article XII of the Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA), materials, supplies, equipment and services procured for official purposes in Japan by the United States armed forces, or its authorized procurement agencies are EXEMPT from various Japanese Taxes, including Consumption Tax. The exemption from the Japanese Consumption Tax applies not only to Japanese prime contractors, but also to Japanese subcontractors or suppliers at every level regardless of the nationality of the prime contractor whether a Japanese or a Foreign firm.

日本の消費税. 日米地位協定（SOFA）第12条により、米軍又はその権限を与えられた調達機関が日

本国内で公的な目的のために調達する材料、物資、機器及びサービスは、消費税を含む日本の各種 税金から免除されます。消費税の免除は、日本の元請業者だけでなく、元請業者の国籍が日本か外国 かにかかわらず、あらゆるレベルの日本の下請業者又は供給業者にも適用されます。

17SECTION 00 22 00

PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

入札書類提出要件

If there is any conflict between the information discussed during this conference and the solicitation, the terms and conditions of the solicitation will govern.

Electronic submission: Proposals shall be submitted electronically via Procurement Integrated Enterprise Environment (PIEE) Solicitation Module. Proposals must be received by the due date and time for proposals specified in the solicitation. The Government will only accept electronic proposals.

Physical or paper copy proposals will not be accepted. See Section 00 21 16.

電子的提出：入札書類は電子的に提出するものとし、入札書類提出の期日と時間までにPIEEモジュール経

由で米政府に受領されなければなりません。米政府は電子的な提案のみを受付けます。物理的又は紙のコ

ピーの入札書類は受理されません。セクション00 21 16を参照して下さい。

Electronic proposals shall be submitted in two (2) separate PDF files for two (2) separate volumes

電子的入札書は2つの別々のボリュームに対し、それぞれ異なる2つのPDFファイルを提出するものとします。

Volume I – Technical Proposal 技術提案 Volume II – Price Proposal 価格提案

See solicitation for specific details and submission instructions.

詳細及び提出方法については入札案内書を参照して下さい。

18SECTION 00 22 00

入札書類提出要件

If there is any conflict between the information discussed during this conference and the solicitation, the terms and conditions of the solicitation will govern.

Volume I – Technical Proposal ボリューム1－技術提案 one (1) Electronic PDF copy 電子版 PDF 1 部

Tab Documents to be Submitted 提出書類

1 Cover Sheet. See Paragraph 2.3.1.3.1 below カバーシート（表紙） 下記の第2.3.1.3.1項を参照

2 Construction Experience: Section 00 22 00, Attachment I “Construction Experience Sheet.” Submit one Construction Experience sheet per project. Proposal shall include at least one (1) project but not more than three (3) projects. See Paragraph 2.3.1.3.2 添付I－「建設施工経験シート」。１事案当たり１枚の建設施工経験シートを提出して下さい。最低1件の事案（最大で3件）を提出し

てください。第2.3.1.3.2項を参照。

3 Subcontractor Experience: Section 00 22 00, Attachment II "Subcontractor Experience Sheet - System Supplier." Submit a minimum of five (5) but not more than seven (7) construction projects. See Paragraph 2.3.1.3.3 添付Ⅱ－「設備供給者の下請け業者経験に関する事案情報シート」。最低5つの事案（最大で7つ）を提出してください。2.3.1.3.3 項を参照。。

4 Past Performance: Section 00 22 00, Attachment III “Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ).” Submit one Past Performance Questionnaire for each project submitted under Factor 1 – Construction Experience. See Paragraph 2.3.1.3.4

添付III－「過去の実績質問票」。要素1-建設施工経験の基で提出された各事案について1つの過去の実績質問票を提出して下さ

い。第2.3.1.3.4項を参照。

19SECTION 00 22 00

入札書類提出要件

If there is any conflict between the information discussed during this conference and the solicitation, the terms and conditions of the solicitation will govern.

FACTOR 1 – Construction Experience 要素1－建設施工経験 The Construction Experience Sheet (Attachment I) included in this solicitation is provided for the offeror to submit for each project included for Factor 1, Construction Experience.

本入札案内書に含まれる建設施工経験シート（添付I）は、入札者が各事案について要素1、建設施工経験を提出する

ためのものです。

Use Attachment I - Construction Experience Sheet to submit a minimum of one (1) but not more than three (3) construction projects. Each submitted project information sheet shall not exceed five (5) pages per project except JV agreements do not count towards the information sheet page limitation. Offerors should ensure all minimum acceptability criteria for the factor are addressed (See Section 00 22 16). The Government will not evaluate more than three (3) projects under this factor for each offeror's proposal. If more than three (3) projects are submitted for this factor, the Government will only evaluate the first three (3) projects submitted for this factor in the order presented in the proposal submitted by the offeror.

添付I－建設施工経験シートを使用し、少なくとも１件最大で３件まで工事事案を提出して下さい。提出する各事案情報

シートは、合弁事業契約書を除き事案１件当たり５ページまでとします。合弁事業契約書は情報シートのページ数の制 限に数えてはなりません。入札者は要素に関する最小限の受入可能基準全てに対応する必要があります（セクション00 22 16 を参照）。米政府は、各入札者の提案についてこの要素の下で３件までを評価します。この要素について4件以上 が提出されても、米政府は、入札者が提出した入札書に提示された順番で、この要素に関する最初の3件の事案のみ を評価します。

20SECTION 00 22 00

入札書類提出要件

If there is any conflict between the information discussed during this conference and the solicitation, the terms and conditions of the solicitation will govern.

FACTOR 2 – System Supplier Subcontractor Experience 要素2－設備供給者下請け業者経験 The Subcontractor Experience Sheet - System Supplier (Attachment II) included in this solicitation is provided for the offeror to submit for each project included for Factor 2, System Supplier Subcontractor Experience.

本入札案内書に含まれる下請け業者経験シート（添付II）は、入札者が各事案について要素2、設備供給者下請け業者経験を提出するためのものです。

Use Attachment II - Subcontractor Experience Sheet to submit a minimum of five (5) but not more than seven (7) construction projects. Each submitted project information sheet should not exceed four (4) pages per project. Offerors should ensure all minimum acceptability criteria for the factor are addressed (See Section 00 22 16). The Government will not evaluate more than seven (7) projects under this factor for each offeror‘s proposal. If more than seven (7) projects are submitted for this factor, the Government will only evaluate the first seven (7) projects submitted for this factor in the order presented in the proposal submitted by the offeror. Per specification Section 33 52 43.11, para 2.2.2: “System Supplier must be a company whose regular, normal, and primary business is representing manufacturers in the distribution and start-up of aviation fueling facilities, and have no affiliation with the Contractor other than as a seller to the Contractor. Supplier must provide all equipment and appurtenances regardless of manufacture, be a factory authorized certified representative, and be responsible to the Contractor for satisfactory operation of the entire system, and must oversee the installation of the equipment.“

添付II－下請け業者経験シートを使用し、少なくとも5件最大で7件まで工事事案を提出して下さい。提出する各事案情報シートは、１件当たり4ページまで

とします。入札者は要素に関する最小限の受入可能基準全てに対応する必要があります（セクション00 22 16 を参照）。米政府は、各入札者の提案につ いてこの要素の下で7件までを評価します。この要素について7件を超える提出があっても、米政府は、入札者が提出した入札書に提示された順番で、こ の要素に関する最初の7件の事案のみを評価します。「システムサプライヤーは、航空燃料供給施設の流通および稼働開始において製造業者を代理す ることを、常態的かつ主要な事業としている企業でなければならず、請負業者への販売業者としての関係以外、請負業者と何らの提携関係も有してはな らない。供給業者は、製造元にかかわらずすべての機器および付属品を提供し、メーカー公認の認定代理店であり、システム全体の適切な稼働について 請負業者に対して責任を負うとともに、機器の設置を監督しなければならない。」（セクション 33 52 43.11 パラグラフ2.2.2 を参照）

21SECTION 00 22 00

入札書類提出要件

If there is any conflict between the information discussed during this conference and the solicitation, the terms and conditions of the solicitation will govern.

FACTOR 3 – Past Performance 要素3－過去の実績

Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQ) – Attachment III, included in this solicitation, is provided for the offeror to submit past performance information for each project submitted for Factor 1, Construction Experience on the Construction Experience Sheet – Attachment I.

本入札案内書に含まれる添付III－過去の実績質問票（PPQ）は、要素1、建設施工経験シート ｰ 添付Iで

提出される各事案の過去の実績情報を入札者が入手するためのものです。

i. Completed Past Performance Questionnaires shall be submitted with your proposal, unless unavailable. If the offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the offeror shall complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ, which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s).

i. 記入した過去の実績質問票は、入手できない場合を除き、入札書類に添付して提出しなくてはなりませ

ん。入札者が入札書類提出締切日前に取引先から記入された過去の実績質問票を入手できない場合、

入札者は各事案の契約及び顧客情報を提供する過去の実績質問票の最初のページを記入し、入札書類

と一緒に提出しなくてはなりません。

22SECTION 00 22 00

入札書類提出要件

If there is any conflict between the information discussed during this conference and the solicitation, the terms and conditions of the solicitation will govern.

FACTOR 3 – Past Performance 要素3－過去の実績

ii. The responsibility to send out the past performance questionnaire rests solely with the offeror. Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires with their proposal. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government’s point of contact, Mr. Jiro Miyairi via e-mail at Jiro.Miyairi@usace.army.mil and Mr. Ryan Marzetta via e-mail at Ryan.J.Marzetta@usace.army.mil, prior to proposal closing date.

ii. 過去の実績質問票を送付する責任は、入札者のみにあります。入札者は、入札書類と一緒に質問票を適時に提出できるよう、顧

客/照会先にフォローアップを行うことが必要です。顧客から要請があれば、入札書類の締切日前に、米政府の窓口である宮入二朗

氏（電子メール：Jiro.Miyairi@usace.army.mil）及びライアン・マーチェッタ氏（電子メール：Ryan.J.Marzetta@usace.army.mil）に質

問票を直接電子メールで提出することもできます。

iii. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation.

While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the Offeror.

iii. 入札者は、過去に他の入札で提出した過去の実績質問票を参照する形で組み込むことはできません。ただし、米政府が過去に

提出された実績質問票情報を過去の実績評価のために利用することを妨げるものではありません。米政府が、他の情報源からの

データを考慮することはできますが、詳細、最新、正確かつ完全な過去の実績情報を提供する責任は、入札者にあります。 mailto:Ryan.J.Marzetta@usace.army.mil mailto:Ryan.J.Marzetta@usace.army.mil mailto:Ryan.J.Marzetta@usace.army.mil

23SECTION 00 22 00

入札書類提出要件

If there is any conflict between the information discussed during this conference and the solicitation, the terms and conditions of the solicitation will govern.

FACTOR 3 – Past Performance – Continued 要素3－過去の実績 － 続き

iv. The Government reserves the right to obtain or verify an Offeror’s past performance information using CAGE/DUNS/SAM UEI numbers of team members (partnership, joint venture, teaming arrangement, or parent company/subsidiary affiliate firm) identified in the offeror’s proposal, from other sources, including, but not limited to Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), and Electronic Subcontracting Reporting System (eSRS) Evaluators in determining the offeror’s past performance confidence rating. Government evaluators may contact your points of contact/references for the projects submitted to verify an Offeror’s past performance on these projects. The Government may consider relevant past performance data obtained from any source in determining the performance confidence rating.

iv. 米政府は、入札者の入札書類で特定されたチーム・メンバー（パートナーシップ、合弁事業、契約、又は親会社/子

会社関連会社）の CAGE/DUNS/SAM UEI 番号を使用して、下記を含む他の情報源から入札者の過去の実績情報

を入手又は確認する権利を留保します。 過去実績情報検索システム(PPIRS)、元受業者実績評価報告システム

(CPARS)、連邦受賞者実績・誠実性情報システム(FAPIIS)、入札者の過去の実績信頼度評価における電子下請け

契約報告システム(eSRS)評価を含みますが、これらに限定されません。米政府の評価者は、提出された事案の連絡

先/参照先に連絡し、これらの事案における入札者の過去の実績を確認することがあります。米政府は、実績信頼度

評価を決定するにあたり、あらゆる情報源から入手した関連する過去の実績データを考慮する可能性があります。

24SECTION 00 22 00

入札書類提出要件

If there is any conflict between the information discussed during this conference and the solicitation, the terms and conditions of the solicitation will govern.

FACTOR 3 – Past Performance – Continued 要素3－過去の実績 － 続き

v. Offerors may submit Contract Performance Assessment Report (CPAR) generated from the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) and other official contract performance assessment records in lieu of the PPQ, Attachment III for any project.

v. 入札者は、いかなる事案についても、過去の実績質問票、添付Ⅲの代わりに、過去実績情報検索シス

テム（PPIRS）から作成された契約実績評価報告書（CPAR）及びその他の正式な契約実績評価記録を提

出することができます。

25SECTION 00 22 00

入札書類提出要件

If there is any conflict between the information discussed during this conference and the solicitation, the terms and conditions of the solicitation will govern.

Documents to be Submitted 提出書類

Cover Sheet. See Paragraph 2.3.2.2.1.

カバーシート（表紙） 。第2.3.2.2.1項を参照。 Standard Form (SF) 1442. Front and back page. Back page completed and signed.

標準様式(SF) 1442 – 表と裏のページ – 裏は記入と署名

Section 00 10 00 – Proposal Schedule セクション00 10 00 – 契約項目一覧

Section 00 45 00 – Representations and Certifications.

セクション00 45 00 – 表明と証明書 Joint Venture Agreement (If proposing as a Joint Venture): If a Joint Venture (JV) is identified in Block 14 of the SF 1442, then a signed joint venture agreement must be submitted with the proposal.

合弁事業契約書（合弁事業の場合）:SF1442のブロック14で合弁事業と特定された場合

、署名された合弁事業契約書を提案書とともに提出しなければならない。 SF30 – Front page for each amendment (if issued) – Completed and Signed

標準様式(SF) 30 – 全ての改定の表のページ(改定が発行されている場合） –

記入と署名

Volume II – Price Proposal ボリュームII － 価格提案 one (1) Electronic PDF copy 電子版 1 部

Tab

Offerors are advised that the Government intends to make an award on the basis of initial proposals without conducting discussions, clarifications or any contact with the offerors. However, the Government reserves the right to discuss aspects of proposals with Offerors in the competitive range, if one is determined to be necessary, upon completion of the evaluation.

米政府は、最初の入札提案に基づき、入札者との協議、説明、接触を行うことなく発注を行う意向である ことを、入札者に忠告します。ただし、米政府は、評価が完了した時点で、競争適格者の範囲に含まれる 提案の側面について、必要であると判断される場合には、入札者と協議する権利を留保します。

Therefore, proposals should be submitted initially on the most favorable terms from a price and technical standpoint. Offerors shall not assume that they will be contacted or afforded an opportunity to clarify, discuss or revise their proposal.

従って、入札提案は、当初、価格及び技術的観点から最も好ましい条件で提出すべきです。入札者は、 提案内容を明確にしたり、議論したり、修正したりするために、連絡を受けたり、機会を与えられたりする ことを想定してはなりません。

SECTION 00 22 16

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

評価要素

If there is any conflict between the information discussed during this

27SECTION 00 22 16

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

評価要素

If there is any conflict between the information discussed during this conference and the solicitation, the terms and conditions of the solicitation will govern.

Contract award will be made to the responsible Offeror whose proposal represents the best value to the Government utilizing the Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) source selection process.

To be eligible for award, an offeror must be evaluated as “acceptable” for Factors 1, 2 and 3.

実施要領で要求された最低技術要件をみたす入札の中で、最低価格の入札をした企業と契約を結ぶ方式

(LPTA)を利用して、米政府に最高価値を与える入札を提示した入札者と契約を締結します。契約締結の

資格を得るために、入札者は要素1, 2と3について「受入可能」と評価されなくてはなりません。

Lowest Price Technically Acceptable Source Selection Process. A process used in competitive negotiated contracting where the best value is expected to result from selection of the technically acceptable proposal with the lowest evaluated price.

実施要領で要求された最低技術要件をみたす入札の中で、最低価格の入札をした企業と契約を結ぶ方式。

実施要領で要求された最低技術要件をみたす入札の中で、最低価格の入札を選択することで最高価値を もたらすと期待される企業と契約をする方式です.

SECTION 00 22 16

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

評価要素

If there is any conflict between the information discussed during this conference and the solicitation, the terms and conditions of the solicitation will govern.

FACTOR 1 – Construction Experience 要素1－建設施工経験 Evaluation Criteria: The Government will evaluate the construction experience demonstrated by the Offeror. The minimum requirements for this technical evaluation factor will be met if the Offeror demonstrates experience on a minimum of one (1) project that individually meet all of the below criteria for minimum acceptability:

評価基準： 米政府は、入札者の建設施工経験を評価します。技術評価要素の最低要件は、入札者が下記の最低受入可能基準を 個々に全て満たす最低１件の事案の建設施工経験を証明できることです：

(1) Offeror was the Prime Contractor of the project at time of completion; 入札者が元請として完成したものであること。

(2) Project was completed no longer than twenty (20) years preceding the date of this solicitation (project completion date shall be no older than 20 years preceding the solicitation issuance date); 本募集日に先立つ20年以内に完成した事案であるこ と（事案の完了日が、本入札公示日に先立つ20年以内であること）。

(3) At time of project completion, the project had a total contract value greater than or equal to 1,000,000,000 JPY (or $10,000,000 U.S. dollars equivalent); and 工事の完成時点で、契約総額が10億円（又は1,000万米ドル相当額）以上であること。

(4) Project was for new construction of a fuel facility which included construction of bulk storage tank(s) as part of the project scope. Fuel types serviced by the constructed facility may include, but is not limited to, the following types of fuel: Jet A, JP-5, JP-8, and /or diesel. 事案は、大量貯蔵タンクを含む燃料設備の新規建設工事事案であること。燃料は Jet A 、JP -5、JP -8、 ディーゼルの燃料タイプを含むがそれらに限定されるものではない。

FACTOR 1 要素1 – CONSTRUCTION EXPERIENCE 建設施工経験

If a proposal cannot demonstrate experience on at least one (1) project which individually meets all of the criteria (1) through (4), then the proposal will be considered "unacceptable" and rejected.

(1)～(4)の評価基準全てを個々に満たす建設施工経験を少なくとも１件を示すことができない場合、 その入札提案は「受入不可能」と判断され、却下されます。

Construction Experience will be rated on an “Acceptable” or “Unacceptable” basis utilizing the rating method in Table 1.

建設施工経験は表1の評価法を利用して、「受入可能」又は「受入不可能」に評価されます。

SECTION 00 22 16

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

評価要素

If there is any conflict between the information discussed during this

FACTOR 1 要素1 – CONSTRUCTION EXPERIENCE 建設施工経験

Construction Experience will be rated on an “Acceptable” or “Unacceptable” basis utilizing the rating method in Table 1.

建設施工経験は表1の評価法を利用して、「受入可能」又は「受入不可能」に評価されます。

Table 1: Factor 1, Construction Experience, Rating Method 表1：要素1、建設施工経験、評価法

Adjectival Rating 評価

Description 詳細

Acceptable 受入可能

Proposal meets the requirements of the solicitation.

入札提案が入札要件を満たす

Unacceptable 受入不可能

Proposal does not meet the requirements of the solicitation.

入札提案が入札要件を満たさない

SECTION 00 22 16

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

評価要素

If there is any conflict between the information discussed during this

SECTION 00 22 16

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

評価要素

If there is any conflict between the information discussed during this conference and the solicitation, the terms and conditions of the solicitation will govern.

FACTOR 2 – System Supplier Subcontractor Experience 要素2－設備供給者下請け業者経験 Evaluation Criteria: The Government will evaluate the past experience demonstrated by the System Supplier Subcontractor. The minimum requirements for this technical evaluation factor will be met if the Offeror demonstrates the below criteria for minimum acceptability on a minimum of 5 (five) projects:

評価基準： 政府は、システムサプライヤーの下請業者が示した過去の実績を評価する。この技術評価要素の最低要件は、入札者 が少なくとも5件のプロジェクトにおいて、以下の最低受入基準を満たしていることを実証した場合に満たされるものとする：

(1) Project was completed no longer than five (5) years preceding the date of this solicitation (project completion date shall be no older than 5 years preceding the solicitation issuance date). 本公募の日付から遡って5年以内に完了して いること（プロジェクトの完了日は、公募の発行日から遡って5年以内であること）。

(2) Project demonstrates System Supplier provided and installed: システムサプライヤーが以下を提供・設置したことが 実証されていること：

i. Systems for dispensing liquid petroleum fuel with pumps, pump controls, piping, and valves; AND ポンプ、ポンプ制 御装置、配管、およびバルブを備えた液化石油燃料の給油システム；かつ

ii. The system demonstrates integrating, commissioning, and balancing, of instrumentation, controls, and pumps. 計 装、制御装置、およびポンプの統合、試運転、およびバランス調整が実施されたことが実証されていること。

FACTOR 2 要素2 – System Supplier Subcontractor Experience 設備供給者下請け業者 経験

* If a proposal cannot demonstrate subcontractor experience on at least five projects which individually meets all of the criteria (1) through (2), then the proposal will be considered "unacceptable" and rejected.

(1)～(2)の評価基準全てを個々に満たす設備供給者下請け業者経験を少なくとも5件を示すことが できない場合、その入札提案は「受入不可能」と判断され、却下されます。

System Supplier Subcontractor Experience will be rated on an "Acceptable" or "Unacceptable" basis utilizing the rating method in Table 2.

設備供給者下請け業者経験は表2の評価法を利用して、「受入可能」又は「受入不可能」に評価され ます。

SECTION 00 22 16

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

評価要素

If there is any conflict between the information discussed during this

FACTOR 2 要素2 – SYSTEM SUPPLIER SUBCONTRACTOR EXPERIENCE 設備供給者下請

け業者経験

System Supplier Subcontractor Experience will be rated on an “Acceptable” or “Unacceptable” basis utilizing the rating method in Table 2.

設備供給者下請け業者経験は表2の評価法を利用して、「受入可能」又は「受入不可能」に評価されます。

Table 2: Factor 2, System Supplier Subcontractor Experience , Rating Method 表2：要素2、設備供給者下請け業者経験、評価法

Adjectival Rating 評価

Description 詳細

Acceptable 受入可能

Proposal meets the requirements of the solicitation.

入札提案が入札要件を満たす

Unacceptable 受入不可能

Proposal does not meet the requirements of the solicitation.

入札提案が入札要件を満たさない

SECTION 00 22 16

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

評価要素

If there is any conflict between the information discussed during this

FACTOR 3 要素3 – PAST PERFORMANCE 過去の実績

Evaluation Criteria: : Past performance will first be evaluated to determine whether the offeror’s past performance is recent and relevant, or not relevant, to the effort to be acquired. Only recent and relevant projects will be considered for this factor. Performance on a project is deemed recent and relevant if the project individually meets all the criteria listed in Factor 1, Construction Experience (see 2.1.1). 評価基準：過去の実績は、まず、入札者の過去の実績が最近のものであり、かつ関連性がある

かどうか評価されます。最近のものでかつ関連した事案のみが本要素について検討されます。提出された事 案が個別に要素1「建設施工経験」の評価基準全てを満たしている場合、最近の実績であり、関連性があると みなされます（2.1.1項を参照）。

Second, the past performance evaluation will determine how well the offeror performed on recent and relevant projects. As a minimum, the offeror shall demonstrate overall satisfactory performance (to include a showing of adequate corrective action on adverse past performance information) on recent and relevant projects. 次に、過去の実績評価では、最近の関連する事案において、入札者がどの程度の

実績を残したかを判断します。最低限、入札者は、最近の関連する事案において、全体的に満足のいく工事 内容（良くない実績情報に対する適切な是正措置の提示を含む）を実証するものとします。

SECTION 00 22 16

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

評価要素

If there is any conflict between the information discussed during this

FACTOR 3 要素 3 – PAST PERFORMANCE 過去の実績

Factor 3, Past Performance, will be rated on an acceptable / unacceptable basis utilizing the rating method in Table 3. 要素3、過去の実績を表3の評価法を利用して受入可能 / 受入不可能かで評価します。

Table 3: Factor 3, Past Performance, Rating Method 表3：要素3、過去の実績、評価法

Adjectival Rating 評価 Description 詳 細

Acceptable 受入可能

Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown. (See note below).

入札者の実績記録に基づき、米政府はその入札者が必要な作業を首尾よく実施できると期待することが妥当で

ある、又は入札者の実績記録が不明である（下記の注意を参照）。

Unacceptable 受入不可能 Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government does not have a reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

入札者の実績記録に基づき、米政府はその入札者が必要な作業を首尾よく実施できると期待することが妥当で

はない。

SECTION 00 22 16

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

評価要素

If there is any conflict between the information discussed during this

FACTOR 3 要素 3 – PAST PERFORMANCE 過去の実績

Note: In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or is so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iv)). Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have “Unknown” or “Neutral” past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, a neutral rating shall be considered “Acceptable”.

注意： 関連する過去の実績記録が無い、又は入手不可能又は少なくて妥当で有意義な評価ができな

い入札者の場合、過去の実績に関し有利にも不利にも評価できません（FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iv))を参照）。

従って、この入札者は過去の実績に関して、「不明」又は「中立」と判断されるものとします。受入可能性

/受入不可能性についての文脈では、中立という評価は「受入可能」とみなされるものとします。

SECTION 00 22 16

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

評価要素

If there is any conflict between the information discussed during this

FACTOR 4 要素4 – PRICE 価格 Evaluation of Price 価格の評価

A price analysis will be performed in accordance with RFO 15.404-1, to determine the fairness and reasonableness of the price, and the adequacy of the offer in fulfilling the requirements of the solicitation in their proposal. This analysis will also check for the appearance of unbalanced line item prices. The Government may utilize historical pricing data, price competition, the Independent Government Estimate (IGE) and/or any other pricing tools necessary to determine fairness and reasonableness. 価格分析は、RFO 15.404-1に従って行われ、募集要件を満たす上での価格の公正

さと適正さ、及び提案の妥当性を判断するために行われます。この分析では、不釣り合いな品目価格も チェックします。米政府は、公正さ及び合理性を判断するために必要な過去の価格データ、価格競争、独

立米政府見積もり（IGE）及び/又はその他の価格ツールを利用することがあります。

Offerors shall ensure the data in Section 00 10 00 is complete and accurate. Failure to provide all price/cost data requested may be cause for determination of proposals as unacceptable. 入札者 はセクション00 10 00 のデータを全て正確に記入するものとします。要求される価格/コストデータの全て を記入していない提案は、受入れられないと判断される場合があります。

SECTION 00 22 16

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

評価要素

If there is any conflict between the information discussed during this

24SECTION 00 45 00 REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS

表明及び証明書

If there is any conflict between the information discussed during this conference and the solicitation, the terms and conditions of the solicitation will govern.

Ensure the following is completed and submitted with proposal (as applicable) 以下の該当する事項を全て記入し提案書と共に提出して下さい（該当する場合）。

Completed Corporate Certificate 記入した企業証明書 If Joint Venture, Completed Certificate for each member of joint venture 合弁事業の場合は記入した各メンバーの企業証明書

FAR Provision 52.204-8, Annual Representation and Certification

FAR 52.204-8項、年次表明及び証明書

FAR Provision 52.209-7, Information Regarding Responsibility Matters

FAR 52.209-7項、責任事項に関する情報

FAR 52.229-11, Tax on Foreign Procurements – Notice and Representation (w/ completed IRS Form W-14, if applicable)

FAR 52.229-11項、外国からの調達に対する税金－ 報告及び表明 (該当する場合は記入済のIRS書式W-14)

DFARS Clause 252.204-7007 Alt A, Annual Representations and Certifications

DFARS 252.204-7007項 代替A、年次表明及び証明書

DFARS 252.204-7017, Prohibition on the Acquisition of Covered Defense Telecommunications Equipment or Services—Representation

DFARS 252.204-7017項、対象となる防衛用通信機器又はサービスの取得の禁止 － 表明

If there is any conflict between the information discussed during this conference and the solicitation, the terms and conditions of the solicitation will govern.

Ensure the following is completed and submitted with proposal (as applicable) 以下の該当する事項を全て記入し提案書と共に提出して下さい（該当する場合）。

DFARS Clause 252.229-7001, Tax Relief

DFARS 252.229-7001項、税控除

SECTION 00 70 00, 00 72 00 AND 00 73 00

CONDITIONS OF THE CONTRACT, GENERAL CONDITIONS AND

SUPPLEMENTARY CONDITIONS

契約要件 conference and the solicitation, the terms and conditions of the solicitation will govern.

Commencement, Prosecution, and Completion of Work 作業の開始、実行及び完了

Period of Performance: 1,020 Calendar Days after Notice to Proceed (NTP) 契約作業期間：着工命令から1,020歴日

FAR Clause 52.211-12, Liquidated Damages – Construction

連邦調達規則(FAR) 52.211-12 遅延損害－建設工事

¥615,000 for each Calendar Day of delay 遅延損害金1暦日につき615,000円

SECTION 00 70 00, 00 72 00 AND 00 73 00

CONDITIONS OF THE CONTRACT, GENERAL CONDITIONS AND

conference and the solicitation, the terms and conditions of the solicitation will govern.

FAR 52.211-15 DEFENSE PRIORITY AND ALLOCATION REQUIREMENTS This is a rated order certified for national defense, emergency preparedness, and energy program use, and the Contractor shall follow all the requirements of the Defense Priorities and Allocations System regulation (15 CFR 700).

FAR 52.211-15 国防優先及び割当要件 本契約は国防、緊急事態準備、エネルギー事業用途として認定さ

れた等級注文です。 業者は国防優先及び割当システム規則（15 CFR 700)の全ての要件に従うものとします。

PRIORITY RATING. This paragraph supplements FAR clause 52.211-15, Defense Priority and Allocation Requirements. Priority rating is DO-C2. Information regarding the Defense Priorities and Allocations System Program (DPAS) can be found at https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/other-areas/strategic-ind ustries-and-economic-security-sies/defense-priorities-a-allocations-system-program-dpas .

優先等級。本項はFAR 52.211-15項、国防優先及び割当要件を補足するものであり、優先等級はDO-C2です。

国防優先及び割当システムプログラム（DPAS）についての情報は下記にあります。

https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/other-areas/strategic-ind ustries-and-economic-security-sies/defense-priorities-a-allocations-system-program-dpas

SECTION 00 70 00, 00 72 00 AND 00 73 00

CONDITIONS OF THE CONTRACT, GENERAL CONDITIONS AND

SUPPLEMENTARY CONDITIONS

契約要件 https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/other-areas/strategic-industries-and-economic-security-sies/defense-priorities-a-allocations-system-program-dpas https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/other-areas/strategic-industries-and-economic-security-sies/defense-priorities-a-allocations-system-program-dpas https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/other-areas/strategic-industries-and-economic-security-sies/defense-priorities-a-allocations-system-program-dpas https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/other-areas/strategic-industries-and-economic-security-sies/defense-priorities-a-allocations-system-program-dpas https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/other-areas/strategic-industries-and-economic-security-sies/defense-priorities-a-allocations-system-program-dpas https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/other-areas/strategic-industries-and-economic-security-sies/defense-priorities-a-allocations-system-program-dpas https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/other-areas/strategic-industries-and-economic-security-sies/defense-priorities-a-allocations-system-program-dpas https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/other-areas/strategic-industries-and-economic-security-sies/defense-priorities-a-allocations-system-program-dpas https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/other-areas/strategic-industries-and-economic-security-sies/defense-priorities-a-allocations-system-program-dpas https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/other-areas/strategic-industries-and-economic-security-sies/defense-priorities-a-allocations-system-program-dpas https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/other-areas/strategic-industries-and-economic-security-sies/defense-priorities-a-allocations-system-program-dpas https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/other-areas/strategic-industries-and-economic-security-sies/defense-priorities-a-allocations-system-program-dpas https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/other-areas/strategic-industries-and-economic-security-sies/defense-priorities-a-allocations-system-program-dpas https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/other-areas/strategic-industries-and-economic-security-sies/defense-priorities-a-allocations-system-program-dpas https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/other-areas/strategic-industries-and-economic-security-sies/defense-priorities-a-allocations-system-program-dpas https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/other-areas/strategic-industries-and-economic-security-sies/defense-priorities-a-allocations-system-program-dpas https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/other-areas/strategic-industries-and-economic-security-sies/defense-priorities-a-allocations-system-program-dpas https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/other-areas/strategic-industries-and-economic-security-sies/defense-priorities-a-allocations-system-program-dpas https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/other-areas/strategic-industries-and-economic-security-sies/defense-priorities-a-allocations-system-program-dpas https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/other-areas/strategic-industries-and-economic-security-sies/defense-priorities-a-allocations-system-program-dpas https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/other-areas/strategic-industries-and-economic-security-sies/defense-priorities-a-allocations-system-program-dpas https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/other-areas/strategic-industries-and-economic-security-sies/defense-priorities-a-allocations-system-program-dpas https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/other-areas/strategic-industries-and-economic-security-sies/defense-priorities-a-allocations-system-program-dpas https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/other-areas/strategic-industries-and-economic-security-sies/defense-priorities-a-allocations-system-program-dpas https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/other-areas/strategic-industries-and-economic-security-sies/defense-priorities-a-allocations-system-program-dpas https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/other-areas/strategic-industries-and-economic-security-sies/defense-priorities-a-allocations-system-program-dpas https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/other-areas/strategic-industries-and-economic-security-sies/defense-priorities-a-allocations-system-program-dpas https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/other-areas/strategic-industries-and-economic-security-sies/defense-priorities-a-allocations-system-program-dpas https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/other-areas/strategic-industries-and-economic-security-sies/defense-priorities-a-allocations-system-program-dpas https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/other-areas/strategic-industries-and-economic-security-sies/defense-priorities-a-allocations-system-program-dpas https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/other-areas/strategic-industries-and-economic-security-sies/defense-priorities-a-allocations-system-program-dpas https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/other-areas/strategic-industries-and-economic-security-sies/defense-priorities-a-allocations-system-program-dpas https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/other-areas/strategic-industries-and-economic-security-sies/defense-priorities-a-allocations-system-program-dpas https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/other-areas/strategic-industries-and-economic-security-sies/defense-priorities-a-allocations-system-program-dpas https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/other-areas/strategic-industries-and-economic-security-sies/defense-priorities-a-allocations-system-program-dpas https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/other-areas/strategic-industries-and-economic-security-sies/defense-priorities-a-allocations-system-program-dpas https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/other-areas/strategic-industries-and-economic-security-sies/defense-priorities-a-allocations-system-program-dpas https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/other-areas/strategic-industries-and-economic-security-sies/defense-priorities-a-allocations-system-program-dpas https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/other-areas/strategic-industries-and-economic-security-sies/defense-priorities-a-allocations-system-program-dpas https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/other-areas/strategic-industries-and-economic-security-sies/defense-priorities-a-allocations-system-program-dpas https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/other-areas/strategic-industries-and-economic-security-sies/defense-priorities-a-allocations-system-program-dpas https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/other-areas/strategic-industries-and-economic-security-sies/defense-priorities-a-allocations-system-program-dpas https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/other-areas/strategic-industries-and-economic-security-sies/defense-priorities-a-allocations-system-program-dpas https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/other-areas/strategic-industries-and-economic-security-sies/defense-priorities-a-allocations-system-program-dpas https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/other-areas/strategic-industries-and-economic-security-sies/defense-priorities-a-allocations-system-program-dpas https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/other-areas/strategic-industries-and-economic-security-sies/defense-priorities-a-allocations-system-program-dpas https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/other-areas/strategic-industries-and-economic-security-sies/defense-priorities-a-allocations-system-program-dpas https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/other-areas/strategic-industries-and-economic-security-sies/defense-priorities-a-allocations-system-program-dpas https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/other-areas/strategic-industries-and-economic-security-sies/defense-priorities-a-allocations-system-program-dpas https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/other-areas/strategic-industries-and-economic-security-sies/defense-priorities-a-allocations-system-program-dpas https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/other-areas/strategic-industries-and-economic-security-sies/defense-priorities-a-allocations-system-program-dpas https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/other-areas/strategic-industries-and-economic-security-sies/defense-priorities-a-allocations-system-program-dpas

DFARS 252.225-7045, Balance of Payments Program – Construction Material Under Trade Agreements – (FEB 2024) – See solicitation for full clause.

DFARS 252.225-7045、国際収支プログラム－建設資材貿易合意－（ 2024 年2月）－全項は入札案

内書を参照。

(c) The contractor shall use only domestic (U.S.) or designated country construction material in performing this contract, except for – 業者は下記を除き、本契約の実施に際し、米国製又は指定された国で製造された建設資材のみ を使用すること。

Designated Country” includes Japan. See clause in solicitation for full list of designated countries.

「指定された国」には日本を含みます。指定された国の全リストは入札案内書の条項を参照し て下さい。

If there is any conflict between the information discussed during this conference and the solicitation, the terms and conditions of the solicitation will govern.

SECTION 00 70 00, 00 72 00 AND 00 73 00

CONDITIONS OF THE CONTRACT, GENERAL CONDITIONS AND

conference and the solicitation, the terms and conditions of the solicitation will govern.

DFARS 252.225-7967, Prohibition Regarding Russian Fossil Fuel Business Operations (Deviation 2024- O0006) (Feb 2024) See solicitation for full clause.

DFARS 252.225-7967 ロシアの化石燃料事業運営 に関する禁止事項(逸脱2024-O0006)(2024年2月) 全項につ

いては入札案内書を参照。

(b) Prohibition. In accordance with section 804 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2024 (Pub. L. 118-31), the Contractor is prohibited from entering into a subcontract or other contractual instrument for the procurement of products or services with any entity or individual that is known to be, or that is known to have fossil fuel business operations with an entity or individual that is, not less than 50 percent owned, individually or collectively, by - (1) An authority of the government of the Russian Federation;

or (2) A fossil fuel company that operates in the Russian Federation, except if the fossil fuel company transports oil or gas…

(b) 禁止。2024 年度米国防権限法セクション804項（公法 118-31） に基づき、業者は、（1）ロシア連邦政府当局、 又は（2）ロシア連邦で運営する化石燃料会社（ただし、化石燃料会社が石油又はガスを輸送する場合を除く）が、個 人又は集団で50％以上所有して化石燃料事業を運営していることが判明している事業体又は個人と、製品又は サービスの調達のための下請契約又はその他の契約文書を締結することが禁止されています。

SECTION 00 70 00, 00 72 00 AND 00 73 00

CONDITIONS OF THE CONTRACT, GENERAL CONDITIONS AND

44SECTION 00 70 00, 00 72 00 AND 00 73 00

CONDITIONS OF THE CONTRACT, GENERAL CONDITIONS AND

SUPPLEMENTARY CONDITIONS

契約要件

If there is any conflict between the information discussed during this conference and the solicitation, the terms and conditions of the solicitation will govern.

DFARS 252.247-7023, Transportation of Supplies by Sea 海路による補給品の輸送

Required to utilize U.S. ocean transportation 米国の海上輸送会社を利用すること。

Submit any request for use of foreign-flag vessels in writing to the Contracting Officer at least 45 days prior to the sailing date necessary to meet its delivery schedules 外国の海上輸送会社の利用を希望する場合は、納期を満たすために必要な出航日の少なくとも 45日前までに、契約担当官に書面で提出すること。

SITE LOCATION

現場所在地

Main Gate メインゲート

Supply Gate 第５ゲート

Project Location 施行現場

Haul Route 運搬経路

Refer to G-101 for Haul Route and Laydown Areas

運搬経路と資材置き場について はG-101を参照

North 北

Project Location 施行現場

Phase I Project 施行現場

If there is any conflict between the information discussed during this

GENERAL SCOPE OF WORK

全般的工事内容

• Provide (1) “Cut and Cover” 100,000 barrel jet fuel storage tank, pumphouse, and access tunnel.

• Provide connections from the new jet fuel storage tank and pumphouse to the existing fuel-filter facility.

• The work also includes site improvements and the installation of an Automatic Tank Gauge for the new jet fuel storage tank.

Project Location 施行現場

If there is any conflict between the information discussed during this

IMPORTANT SCOPE…