Questions-Answers 1.docx
DOCX document 12 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W912HQ-20-R-0002
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Charleston Peninsula IEPR_PWS-RFP (Revised).DOCX | DOCX document | |
| Solicitation W912HQ-20-R-0002(Revised).PDF | ||
| Charleston IEPR Questions-Answers 3.docx | DOCX document | |
| Charleston Peninsula IEPR_Charge Questions.docx | DOCX document | |
| NAVFAC Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf | ||
| Solicitation W912HQ-20-R-0002(Final).PDF | ||
| COI Form_Charleston CSRM IEPR.DOCX | DOCX document | |
| Charleston Peninsula IEPR_PWS (RFI-RFP).DOCX | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Q1. On page 34 General Instructions to Offerors, paragraph 1.b it states that proposals will be via email, but then has language contradicting that in the next sentence.
A1. Only electronic submission is required.
Q2. On page 35, under Factor 1- Management Approach, it asks for a resume for a “Principal-in-charge”. That term cannot be found anyplace else including the labor category definitions. Can USACE please describe the role the Principal-in-charge will fill and which labor category they should be associated with.
A2. USACE would like to see a brief resume for the company principal or officer with oversight responsibility for the proposed work and authority to make financial and resource commitments, for example, if corrective action is needed for deficiencies identified in the work. It is assumed that this person would bill under the Principal Investigator labor category.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .