COI Form_Charleston CSRM IEPR.DOCX
DOCX document 15 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W912HQ-20-R-0002
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Charleston Peninsula IEPR_PWS-RFP (Revised).DOCX | DOCX document | |
| Solicitation W912HQ-20-R-0002(Revised).PDF | ||
| Charleston IEPR Questions-Answers 3.docx | DOCX document | |
| Questions-Answers 1.docx | DOCX document | |
| Charleston Peninsula IEPR_Charge Questions.docx | DOCX document | |
| NAVFAC Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf | ||
| Solicitation W912HQ-20-R-0002(Final).PDF | ||
| Charleston Peninsula IEPR_PWS (RFI-RFP).DOCX | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Conflicts of Interest Questionnaire Independent External Peer Review Charleston Peninsula Coastal Flood Risk Management Study Charleston, South Carolina
The purpose of this document is to help the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers identify potential organizational conflicts of interest on a task order basis as early in the acquisition process as possible. Complete the questionnaire with background information and fully disclose relevant potential conflicts of interest. Substantial details are not necessary; USACE will examine additional information if appropriate. Affirmative answers will not disqualify your firm from this or future procurements.
NAME OF FIRM: _____________________________
REPRESENTATIVE’S NAME: _____________________________
TELEPHONE: ___________________
ADDRESS: __________________________________________________________
EMAIL ADDRESS: ___________________________________________________
I. INDEPENDENCE FROM WORK PRODUCT. Has your firm been involved in any aspect of the preparation of the subject study report and associated analyses (field studies, report writing, supporting research etc.) No Yes (if yes, briefly describe):
II. INTEREST IN STUDY AREA OR OUTCOME. Does your firm have any interests or holdings in the study area, or any stake in the outcome or recommendations of the study, or any affiliation with the local sponsor? No Yes (if yes, briefly describe):
III. REVIEWERS. Do you anticipate that all expert reviewers on this task order will be selected from outside your firm? No Yes (if no, briefly describe the difficulty in identifying outside reviewers):
IV. AFFILIATION WITH PARTIES THAT MAY BE INVOLVED WITH PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION. Do you anticipate that your firm will have any association with parties that may be involved with or benefit from future activities associated with this study, such as project construction? No Yes (if yes, briefly describe):
V. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. Report relevant aspects of your firm’s background or present circumstances not addressed above that might reasonably be construed by others as affecting your firm’s judgment. Please include any information that may reasonably: impair your firm’s objectivity; skew the competition in favor of your firm; or allow your firm unequal access to nonpublic information.
YOUR SIGNATURE DATE
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .