2020.10.07 Phase 1 Complete Bidder Inquiry Report.pdf

UNCLASSIFIED\\FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Bid Inquiry Contractor Report All Inquiries

Project: Multi-Location SATOCs Review: Phase 1 Bidder Inquires (00001) (sorted by CommentID ) Displaying 49 inquiries.

Id Discipline Sheet Detail Spec 8823457 General Page 13 of 88 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

If you have a formal teaming agreement can you use experience of teaming partner as well.

On: Sep 11 2020.

Government Response. . The experience of the partner can be used if you are submitting as a joint venture. On: Sep 17 2020 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8823535 General Page 6 of 88 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

The SF1442 indicated 3 Offerors per location will be invited to participate in Phase 2 and pg 6 of 88 indicated there will be 5 shortlisted per location. Please confirm.

On: Sep 11 2020.

Government Response. . Five will be shortlisted per location. On: Sep 17 2020 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8823545 Contracting Detail Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Would the Government consider decreasing the Project Magnitude requirement to less than $2M?

On: Sep 11 2020.

Government Response. . No. On: Sep 17 2020 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8823748 General 13 of 88 13 of 88 13 of 88 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Solicitation page 13 of 88, Section 4.1.2 - "A higher confidence level could be achieved with the submission of 3 or more design-build projects" Please confirm if a higher confidence level will or will not be achieved with the submission of 3 or more design-build projects.

On: Sep 11 2020.

Government Response. . Reference 4.2.3 Confidence Assessment. Your confidence assessment may increase or decrease based on the size, scope, complexity and location of the project submitted. On: Sep 17 2020 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8823756 General General General General Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Please confirm the minimum and maximum dollar value range for individual task orders.

On: Sep 11 2020.

Page 1 of 11ProjNet: Logged In User

10/7/2020https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicPublicReportAl...

Government Response. . Maximum order is $5,000,000 - See Clause 52.216-19 Order Limitations. On:

Sep 17 2020 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8823765 General General General General Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

If the minimum dollar value for individual task orders for this SATOC is less than $2 Million, will the government consider decreasing the $2 Million minimum for the 3-5 recent relevant projects.

On: Sep 11 2020.

Government Response. . No. On: Sep 17 2020 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8823777 General General General General Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Please confirm if is a requirement that a minimum (3) of the (5) of the submitted recent relevant projects must be Design-Build.

On: Sep 11 2020.

Government Response. . Confirm. On: Sep 17 2020 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8823811 General 16 of 88 General General Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Solicitation, Page 16 of 88, Section 5.1.1 - If the SATOC bidder is submitting the intended DOR's design experience on Design Build projects for this section, would the government like to know the total design cost in lieu of construction cost of the reference projects? If the designer of record does not know the final construction cost (because they were the designer not the builder), how should we proceed?

On: Sep 11 2020.

Government Response. . No, IAW 5.1.1 - In the narrative, clearly state the project construction cost, if design-build or design-bid-build, the role of the A-E, and date of design completion. On: Sep 17 2020 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8827037 Contracting Section 00 21 00 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

On solicitation page 13 it says that "Offerors may also submit a CPARS evaluation for each relevant project. Ensure that the PPQs or CPARS evaluations submitted..." Does this mean that offerors can provide CPARS evaluations for Factor 1 projects instead of PPQs? USACE and NAVFAC RFPs for construction contracts typically insist that if a CPARS evaluation exists for a project that the CPARSs evaluation (and not a PPQ) is provided in a past performance section.

On: Sep 15 2020.

Government Response. . Yes. On: Sep 17 2020 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8827038 Contracting Section 00 21 00 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

The instructions for Factor 1 (Sections 4.1.1. and 4.1.3) indicate that an additional page may be used (per project, we assume) to provide information on a project's relevance to this SATOC. Are there any restrictions regarding margin size or font size?

On: Sep 15 2020.

Page 2 of 11ProjNet: Logged In User

Government Response. . 1" Margins, Minimum 11 pt Font. On: Sep 17 2020 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8827040 Contracting Section 00 21 00 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Section 5.1.1. says that the narrative for the DOR's relevant experience is "not to exceed a total of five (5) pages."

Are there any restrictions regarding margin size or font size?

On: Sep 15 2020.

Government Response. . 1" Margins, Minimum 11 pt Font. On: Sep 17 2020 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8827041 Contracting Section 00 21 00 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Section 5.1.7. says: "In addition to the five (5) page narrative, Offerors may submit an additional two (2) pages describing the relationship between the Prime and the Designer of Record for the performance of a subsequent contract (business agreement, formal arrangement, etc.)." It appears as though teaming agreements (if any) do not need to be included in an offeror's proposal. Is this correct?

On: Sep 15 2020.

Government Response. . Correct. On: Sep 17 2020 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8828208 Construction Phasing

4. Phase One - Tab G - Factor 1 - Past Performance

4.1 Submission

Requirements 4.1.2

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Will the Government consider reducing the requirement on past experience to a threshold of $250,000 versus $2M, considering this is a HUBZone set aside?

On: Sep 15 2020.

Government Response. . No. On: Sep 17 2020 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8829365 Construction Management Volume 2, Tab G 4.1.2

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Can project completion date be extended from 5 years to 8 years?

On: Sep 16 2020.

Government Response. . No. On: Sep 17 2020 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8829367 Construction Management Page 9

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Due to administrative challenges related to the Pandemic, is it possible to request a 2 week extension?

On: Sep 16 2020.

Government Response. . A 2 week extension will not be allowed. On: Sep 28 2020 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

Page 3 of 11ProjNet: Logged In User

8829748 General General Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Please confirm the type of software that will be required for Government unit pricing structure. Will it be RS Means online, 4 Clicks, EUROJOC, or some other RS Means database system?

On: Sep 16 2020.

Government Response. . RS Means Online. On: Sep 17 2020 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8829749 General General Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Will Task Order negotiations on future Task Orders be conducted with USACE or DPW staff?

On: Sep 16 2020.

Government Response. . USACE Staff. On: Sep 17 2020 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8829750 General General Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

What is the typical turn around time for future D/B Task Orders on this SATOC? 30 days or sooner?

On: Sep 16 2020.

Government Response. . 45-60 days. On: Sep 17 2020 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8829751 Construction Management General

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Will Field Team (Superintendent, QC and SSHO) require full time commitment on each awarded Task Order or will a dual role structure be allowed on smaller Task Orders?

On: Sep 16 2020.

Government Response. . It will be negotiable on a task order basis. On: Sep 17 2020 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8833074 General Page 7 Section 3.1 Title Page Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

The solicitation says that "Offerors MUST clearly indicate the location in which they are submitting on the Title Page of their proposal"

I'm assuming that we can list all three in the order of preference? Thanks.

On: Sep 18 2020.

Government Response. . You must clearly indicate the location(s) you are submitting for as not everyone will be submitting for all 3 locations.

Contractors will not be deciding the order of preference.

Per the solicitation section 3.1, the Government will be awarding in contracts in this order (1) SRM02, Ft.

Bragg $49M SB SATOC; (2) SRM05, Ft. Gordon $49M HZ SATOC, AND (3) SRM08, Ft. Stewart $30M HZ SATOC. On: Sep 21 2020 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

Page 4 of 11ProjNet: Logged In User

8835078 Contracting Solicitation Past Performance Requirement

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Is there an upper limit on the projects submitted for experience/past performance to be considered relevant? We see there is a lower limit of $2 million.

On: Sep 21 2020.

Government Response. . No upper limit on dollar value. On: Sep 24 2020 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8835082 Contracting Solicitation Proposal Format Past Performance Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

May previously obtained PPQs be submitted (actual inclusion, not incorporated by reference) to satisfy past performance requirements or must offerors obtain a new PPQ?

On: Sep 21 2020.

Government Response. . Yes. All other requirements related to the PPQs must still be met. On: Sep 21 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8837233 General 4 4.1 4.1.1 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

If the Offeror has a 40% owner, will that minority owner's past performance be considered for the Offeror's past performance?

On: Sep 22 2020.

Government Response. . You can use it if there is a valid Joint Venture with the minority owner. On:

Sep 28 2020 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8838716 Contracting Solicitation Past Performance Comment Classification: UNCLASSIFIED (U)

Response 8835082 clarification. Please confirm previously obtained PPQs may be used to satisfy past performance.

On: Sep 23 2020.

Government Response. . Confirm.

They must meet all other related requirements of the PPQ.

One example is the project must be successfully completed or fully designed and at least 50% construction progress completed within five (5) years preceding the date of this solicitation. On: Sep 28 2020 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8839150 General 4 4.1 4.1.1 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

If the Offeror does not have past performance that meets the minimum $2M requirement, but is 40% owned by a company who meets all requirements AND is in a mentor-protégé agreement with the Offeror, will the government accept the past performance of the minority owner as the past performance of the Offeror?

On: Sep 23 2020.

Government Response. . If the Offeror is a joint venture, the projects do not have to have been performed by the joint venture submitting the offer. The projects could have been performed by either company in the joint venture. Offerors are advised to submit projects wherein the Offeror, or proposed joint venture members, played a significant role and to clearly define those roles. On: Sep 28 2020

Page 5 of 11ProjNet: Logged In User

Government Response. . The text below appends or clarifies ALL previous replies.

The Offeror must be a joint venture. A mentor-protégé alone is not sufficient. On: Sep 28 2020 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8839968 General Clauses Incorporated by Reference

52.215-22 Limitations on Pass-Through Charges (2)

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

In the RFP, the Gov't includes FAR 52.215-22 which states under (c), Performance of work by the Contractor or a subcontractor. (1) The offeror shall identify in its proposal the total cost of the work to be performed by the offeror, and the total cost of the work to be performed by each subcontractor, under the contract, task order, or delivery order.

Please clarify if we are to include cost of work performed by the offeror and subcontractors in our Phase I proposal, although Phase I does not require Pricing.

On: Sep 23 2020.

Government Response. . This is for Phase 2. On: Sep 28 2020 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8839988 General Clauses Incorprated by Full Text

52.215-22 Limitations on Pass-Through Charges (2)

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

The Gov't provides FAR 52.215-22 in the RFP, which states: (2) If the offeror intends to subcontract more than 70 percent of the total cost of work to be performed under the contract, task order, or delivery order, the offeror shall identify in its proposal--

Please clarify if this is to be submitted with Phase I, although Pricing is not submitted until Phase II.

On: Sep 23 2020.

Government Response. . This is for Phase 2. On: Sep 28 2020 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8839993 General Clauses Incorprated by Full Text

52.215.22 Limitations on

Pass-through charges (3)

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

The Gov't provides FAR 52.215-22 in the RFP, which states: (3) If any subcontractor proposed under the contract, task order, or delivery order intends to subcontract to a lowertier subcontractor more than 70 percent of the total cost of work to be performed under its subcontract, the offeror shall identify in its proposal--

Please clarify if this requirement is to be submitted with Phase I, although Pricing is not submitted until Phase II.

On: Sep 23 2020.

Government Response. . This is for Phase 2. On: Sep 28 2020 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8839998 General Section 00 21 00 4.1 Submission Requirements 4.1.2

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

The Government states, "Please note that projects submitted by design firms will not be evaluated in this factor.

Design firms shall submit projects in accordance with the requirements in Factor 3", listed under Factor 1 - Past Performance.

Please clarify if the Government meant to state "Factor 2 - Design Experience" instead of "Factor 3 - Technical Approach".

Page 6 of 11ProjNet: Logged In User

On: Sep 23 2020.

Government Response. . The Government intended to state "Factor 2 - Design Experience" instead of Factor 3. On: Oct 02 2020 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8841681 Construction Management 01 45 00

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Please confirm that the CQC Personnel / Matrix Experience as shown in General Specifications 014500 – Quality Control, will not be required within the Coefficient submitted in Phase II. This CQC Personnel requirement will be a project by project assessment and part of final negotiations on the Task Orders. Secondly, please confirm that this matrix of personnel will not be required within the FOOH rate in Phase II. This personnel matrix will require five (5) or more additional staff by the General Contractor.

On: Sep 24 2020.

Government Response. . Requirements for what is included in the coefficient will be addressed in the Phase II solicitation. Personnel required for Quality Control are evaluated per task order. On: Sep 28 2020 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8841688 Construction Management Scheduling

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Please confirm P6 Software will be required for all the small Task Order type work associated with the SATOC.

Typically, these smaller Task Orders do not require a full P6 type cost-loaded schedule. Secondly, is this P6 scheduler part of the Coefficient or FOOH rate?

On: Sep 24 2020.

Government Response. . Scheduling requirements are determined on a task order basis. Requirements for what is included in the coefficient will be addressed in the Phase II solicitation. On: Sep 28 2020 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8841691 General General Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Please confirm how Design fees will be handled on future Task Orders. Will Design fees be a negotiated item for each individual task order or will the Design fees be determined by RS Means line items?

On: Sep 24 2020.

Government Response. . Design fees are negotiated on a task order basis based on the level of design required for each project. On: Sep 28 2020 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8843656 Construction Management General

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

This SATOC is a Small Business contract and typically small business structures do not have the staffing and/or resources to have the CQC Personnel / Matrix Experience as shown in General Specifications 014500 – Quality Control. Please consider allowing subcontractor support for the CQC Personnel / Matrix shown in Division One specifications in lieu of in-house General Contractor staff.

On: Sep 25 2020.

Government Response. . CQC personnel requirements are determined on a per task order basis. On:

Sep 28 2020 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

Page 7 of 11ProjNet: Logged In User

8844832 Contracting Solicitation Bonding Letter Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Would the Government please consider allowing the letter evidencing of bonding capacity to be submitted with the electronic proposal rather than via hard copy. If the requirement for a hard copy remains, please clarify whether it is due prior to the submission of the proposal or may be received within 48 hours after the due date/time.

On: Sep 27 2020.

Government Response. . The requirement is for hard copy only. We need the original with the raised seal. Electronic is unacceptable. It is due prior to the submission of the proposal, not after or it's considered late. On: Sep 30 2020 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8844833 Contracting Solicitation Evidence of Financial Strength

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

In the case of a JV, are the documents in Volume I, Tab E, Financial Information required for each JV member?

On: Sep 27 2020.

Government Response. . Yes. We need combined financial and separate for each company. On: Sep 28 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8847498 Other N/A N/A N/A Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Is SF-LLL "Disclosure of Lobbying Activities" required in the Phase I or Phase II submission? If Phase I, please provide appropriate placement of the document.

On: Sep 29 2020.

Government Response. . Include this in Phase 1. Tab B – Section 00 45 00 – Representations and Certifications. On: Oct 02 2020 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8847723 General Page 3 of 88 n/a Comment Classification: UNCLASSIFIED (U)

It is noted to ***SEE SCHEDULE A NOTES*** for coefficient. Schedule A Notes are not included in this Solicitation, will it be provided for Phase One or will it be provided for Phase Two offerors only?

On: Sep 29 2020.

Government Response. . Provided in Phase 2. On: Sep 30 2020 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8847833 Contracting 12 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Is any pricing due with Phase 1 (e.g. CLIN Item 0001)?

On: Sep 29 2020.

Government Response. . No. On: Oct 02 2020 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8847837 Contracting 3 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Page 8 of 11ProjNet: Logged In User

If we are submitting on all 3 locations, are we required to submit 3 separate proposal, one for each location? Or can we submit 1 proposal, listing all 3 locations?

On: Sep 29 2020.

Government Response. . You can submit one proposal listing all 3 locations. You still must meet the eligibility requirements. On: Oct 02 2020 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8847841 Contracting 15 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

We have PPQs from past proposals, on the same form. Can these be submitted in lieu of requesting new PPQs for the same client/project?

On: Sep 29 2020.

Government Response. . Confirm.

They must meet all other related requirements of the PPQ.

One example is the project must be successfully completed or fully designed and at least 50% construction progress completed within five (5) years preceding the date of this solicitation. On: Sep 30 2020 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8847844 Contracting 15 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Section 4 Submission requirements, Paragraph 4.1.2 states "A higher confidence level could be achieved with the submission of 3 or more design-build projects." Later, in the paragraph, it states "No less than three (3) of the five

(5) projects should be Design-Build construction". Will the Government allow less than 3 of the submitted projects of $2M or more to be Design-Build? Alternately, will the government allow the dollar threshold on DB to be $1.3M? We have several DB projects in construction but for various factors do not meet all 3 of the thresholds identified (i.e., $2M, DB, and 50% construction).

On: Sep 29 2020.

Government Response. . If the Offeror submits less than 3 Design-Build projects, it may negatively affect the level of confidence during evaluation (see 4.2.3 Confidence Assessment).

Dollar thresholds will not be changed. On: Oct 02 2020 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8848335 General Page 11 of 88 TAB E Comment Classification: UNCLASSIFIED (U)

What is the Bonding Capability limits that are being required for this solicitation, Single and Aggregate? Surety Letter is being requested but no amount for single or aggregate is discussed within the solicitation.

On: Sep 29 2020.

Government Response. . No bonding capability limits required for the solicitation. Surety Letter should indicate your company's single and aggregate bonding capability. On: Oct 05 2020 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8849905 Construction Management

PHASE 1-TAB H - FACTOR

2 - DESIGN EXPERIENCE

PHASE 1-TAB H - FACTOR

2 - DESIGN EXPERIENCE

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

PHASE 1-TAB H - FACTOR 2 - DESIGN EXPERIENCE

Are PPQs required for the Design Team's 3-5 projects in Factor? Solicitation states - Offeror shall submit a narrative not to exceed a total of five (5) pages describing its Design Experience or the intended Designer of Record's (DOR) experience. In the narrative, clearly state the project construction cost, if design-build or design-bid-build, the role of

Page 9 of 11ProjNet: Logged In User the A-E, and date of design completion. Please confirm if Design Firm Projects must include acass evaluations or completed PPQ-0 forms with the Phase I submission?

On: Sep 30 2020.

Government Response. . No to both. On: Oct 02 2020 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8850854 General section 4.1.1 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

In section 4.1.1 o0f the solicitation it states "Offerors may also submit a CPARS evaluation for each relevant project"

Can Offerors submit both PPQ and CPARS for each project submitted for consideration?

On: Oct 01 2020.

Government Response. . Yes. On: Oct 02 2020 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8851896 General 4 4.1 4.1.1 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

In Section 4.1.1 of the solicitation it states, "Offerors may attach one additional single-sided page (per PPQ) to further describe how the project is similar to the RFP requirements."

No additional page allotment was give for those projects in which a CPARS is submitted in lieu of a PPQ. CPARS do not contain all of the pertinent, relevant information required for proper evaluation. This creates a disparity between those Offerors who submit PPQs versus those who submit CPARS.

Will the Government allow an additional single-sided page (per CPARS) to further describe how the project is similar to the RFP requirements?

On: Oct 01 2020.

Government Response. . Yes. On: Oct 02 2020 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8853924 Construction Phasing due date

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

We respectfully request a 7 day extension from the original due-date.

On: Oct 02 2020.

Government Response. . 7 day extension will not be granted. On: Oct 05 2020 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8855210 General 7 3 3 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Would the Government please confirm that any Cover Sheets, Table of Contents and Tabs do not count against any page limitations indicated in this Solicitation?

On: Oct 05 2020.

Government Response. . Confirm. On: Oct 06 2020 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8855238 General 11 2 2 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Page 10 of 11ProjNet: Logged In User

Would the Government please confirm how Offerors should reflect in their Submission that they have indeed submitted their hard copy of the required Surety Letter? Would the Government accept a "Proof of Delivery" Letter in their Volume I Tab E as proper proof of this requirement?

On: Oct 05 2020.

Government Response. . No submittal verification required. We will verify the Surety Letters received at the deadline. On: Oct 06 2020 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

8855470 Contracting SF1442 SF1442 - 13 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Can contracting grant a 7 day extension to the bid date?

On: Oct 05 2020.

Government Response. . No extension will be granted. On: Oct 06 2020 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

Report Complete

UNCLASSIFIED\\FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Patent 11/892,984 ProjNet property of ERDC since 2004.

Page 11 of 11ProjNet: Logged In User