13R10ph2vol1.pdf

Robins AFB Georgia

Solicitation Number

W912HN-13-R-0010

Design-Build to Replace Roof, Fire Alarm, and Fire Suppression, Building 125 Volume 1 of 2 - Sections 00010 through 00800, Technical Provisions - Division 01, and Appendices A-D and F- I

PN UHHZ110183

April 2013

PHASE TWO OF TWO-PHASE DESIGN/BUILD

SELECTION PROCESS

This project is solicited through full and open competition, using a 2-Phase Design-Build Selection Process. This acquisition includes a price evaluation preference for

HUBZone small business concerns.

U.S. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT, SAVANNAH

CORPS OF ENGINEERS

100 WEST OGLETHORPE AVENUE

SAVANNAH, GEORGIA 31401-3640

US Army Corps of Engineers Savannah District

Roof and Fire Suppression, Bldg 125 13R10, Phase 2 Robins AFB, GA

PHASE 2

PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS

DIVISION 01 - GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

01 01 00 GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND DESIGN REQUIREMENTS

01 01 20 DESIGN AFTER AWARD (DESIGN/BUILD)

01 04 00 SITE REQUIREMENTS

01 32 01.00 10 PROJECT SCHEDULE

01 33 00 SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES

SUBMITTAL REGISTER

01 42 00 SOURCES FOR REFERENCE PUBLICATIONS

01 45 00.10 10 QUALITY CONTROL SYSTEM (QCS)

01 45 04.10 06 CONTRACTOR QUALITY CONTROL

01 50 00 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION FACILITIES AND CONTROLS

01 54 00 GREEN PROCUREMENT AND POLLUTION PREVENTION

01 56 00 ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS CHECKLIST

01 57 20 CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION WASTE MANAGEMENT

01 57 23 TEMPORARY STORM WATER POLLUTION CONTROL

01 62 35 RECYCLED / RECOVERED MATERIALS

01 78 00 CLOSEOUT SUBMITTALS

APPENDICES

Appendix 1A Robins AFB Base Fire Alarm System Guide Specification Appendix 1B Robins AFB Base Facility Standard Appendix 1C Robins AFB Weather Data Appendix 1D Example Permits and Reports Appendix 1E Reference Drawings (electronic copy only) Appendix 1F Environmental Reports (electronic copy only) Appendix 1G Fire Water Flow Test Appendix 1H Additional Fire Protection Requirements Appendix 1I 2008 Fire Pump Test Results

-- End of Project Table of Contents --

W912HN-13-R-0010-0006

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION TO REPLACE ROOF, FIRE ALARM, FIRE SUPPRESSION, BUILDING 125 AT

ROBINS AIR FORCE BASE, GEORGIA UHHZ110183

The project is solicited through Full and Open Competition, using Tw o-Phase, Design-Build Selection Process. This acquisition includes a price evaluation preference for HUBZone small business concerns.

Wage Determination GA152 is attached.

The proposal of the successful Offeror shall be considered incorporated by reference upon aw ard of contract.

Contract Specialist: Jennifer Casey Phone: 912-652-5539 Email: jennifer.s.casey@usace.army.mil

JENNIFER K SLATE 912-652-5539

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".

10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS

NEGOTIATED

07-Feb-2013

(RFP)

(IFB)

X

CALL:

B. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS)

See Item 7

2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

SEALED BID

3. DATE ISSUED

9. FOR INFORMATION A. NAME

SOLICITATION

NSN 7540-01-155-3212 1442-101 STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 4-85)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.236-1(e)

11. The Contractor shall begin performance w ithin _______10 calendar days and complete it w ithin ________ calendar days after receiving aw ard, X notice to proceed. This performance period is X mandatory, negotiable. (See _________________________ Section 00800

12 A. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS?

(If "YES," indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12B.)

X YES NO

13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:

A. Sealed offers in original and __________6 copies to perform the w ork required are due at the place specified in Item 8 by ___________ local time ______________21 May 2013 (date). If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers must be publicly opened at that time.

shall be marked to show the offeror's name and address, the solicitation number, and the date and time offers are due.

B. An offer guarantee X is, is not required.

C. All offers are subject to the (1) w ork requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.

D. Offers providing less than _______90 calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due w ill not be considered and w ill be rejected.

SOLICITATION, OFFER,

AND AWARD

(Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

1. SOLICITATION NO.

IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by offeror.

4. CONTRACT NO.

7. ISSUED BY CODE

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SAVANNAH D

100 WEST OGLETHORPE AVE

SAVANNAH GA 31402

W912HN

PAGE OF PAGES

1 OF

CODE

(Title, identifying no., date):

12B. CALENDAR DAYS

02:00 PM (hour)

Sealed envelopes containing offers

5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NO. 6. PROJECT NO.

8. ADDRESS OFFER TO (If Other Than Item 7)

FAX:TEL: TEL: FAX:

20B. SIGNATURE

(REV. 4-85)STANDARD FORM 1442 BACK

TO SIGN

NSN 7540-01-155-3212

SOLICITATION, OFFER, AND AWARD (Continued) (Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

CODE FACILITY CODE

17. The offeror agrees to perform the w ork required at the prices specif ied below in strict accordance w ith the terms of this solicitation, if this offer is accepted by the Government in w riting w ithin ________ calendar days after the date offers are due.

the minimum requirements stated in Item 13D. Failure to insert any number means the offeror accepts the minimum in Item 13D.)

AMOUNTS SEE SCHEDULE OF PRICES

18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.

19. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation -- give number and date of each)

AMENDMENT NO.

DATE

20A. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN

OFFER (Type or print)

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

21. ITEMS ACCEPTED:

22. AMOUNT 23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

24. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN ITEM

(4 copies unless otherwise specified)

CODE

(Insert any number equal to or greater than

20C. OFFER DATE

25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PURSUANT TO

10 U.S.C. 2304(c) 41 U.S.C. 253(c)

CODE27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY:26. ADMINISTERED BY

(Include ZIP Code)14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR 15. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code)

See Item 14

(Include only if different than Item 14)16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS

30B. SIGNATURE

29. AWARD (Contractor is not required to sign this document.)

document and return _______ copies to issuing office.) Contractor agrees Your of f er on this solicitation, is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This award con-to f urnish and deliv er all items or perf orm all work, requisitions identif ied summates the contract, which consists of (a) the Gov ernment solicitation and on this f orm and any continuation sheets f or the consideration stated in this y our of f er, and (b) this contract award. No f urther contractual document is contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract shall be necessary .

gov erned by (a) this contract award, (b) the solicitation, and (c) the clauses, representations, certif ications, and specif ications or incorporated by ref er-ence in or attached to this contract.

30A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED 31A. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

30C. DATE

(Type or print)

TEL: EMAIL:

31B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 31C. AWARD DATE

BY

CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE

(Contractor is required to sign this28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT

(M ust be fully completed by offeror)OFFER

Section 00010 - Solicitation Contract Form

SCOPE OF WORK

B125 SUMMARY SCOPE

A. Building 125 is a large aircraft hangar constructed in the early 1940’s. It is an AMXG (Aircraft Division) Facility consisting of four (4) large docks utilized for the Programmed Depot Maintenance (PDM) and overhaul of C-5 cargo aircraft. There are north/south annexes, and center high-low monitor areas that contain administrative offices and maintenance shops. The project will be design build (DB).

B. This project includes the removal and replacement of the existing corrugated metal (Galbestos coated) barrel roof at docks 1-4 totaling approximately 256,000 SF, and the removal and replacement of existing dock corrugated metal (Galbestos coated) side wall panels totaling approximately 129,000 SF. Included are internal gutters that need replacement. The dock roofs and walls have exceeded their life expectancy. This roofing will be replaced with 100’ continuous panels.

C. This project also includes heavy metal (chromium III, chromium VI, lead (non-paint) and cadmium) dust cleaning, stripping paint from existing structural steel framing within the dock bays, and repainting.

D. This project also includes the removal and replacement of existing built-up roof system for the north/south annexes, center high-low monitor roofs and out building roofs adjoining B125 totaling approximately 253,000 SF, with a new roofing system, including interior roof drain assemblies where required, gutters, downspouts, flashing, etc. The built-up roofs are approaching their life expectancy.

E.This project also includes the design and installation of a new lightning protection system and a new Fire Protection & Suppression system.

F. The design shall address the requirements for worker notification, abatement, and disposal of all hazardous materials including asbestos, pcb, heavy metals and lead paint.

Note: Galbestos coated corrugated metal contains asbestos and pcbs.

NOTES TO OFFERORS

REPAIR ROOF, FIRE ALARM, FIRE SUPPRESSION, BUILDING 125

ROBINS, AFB, GEORGIA

SECTION 000010 - NOTES TO OFFERORS

Only offerors who have been selected to move to Phase 2 shall submit a proposal for the Phase 2 solicitation.

ELECTRONIC PROPOSAL SUBMISSION, TO INCLUDE E-MAIL AND FACSIMILE

TRANSMISSIONS, IS NOT AUTHORIZED.

HAND CARRIED PROPOSAL SUBMISSION, except for delivery by Federal Express and United Parcel Service, IS NOT AUTHORIZED.

Proposals must be delivered by U.S. Mail, including U.S. Express Mail, Federal Express or United Parcel Service.

All proposals must be clearly identified with the contractor’s name and address. To ensure timely and proper handling, the lower left corner of the outermost wrapper should indicate the following:

Request For Proposal No: W912HN-13-R-0010 Due Date of Proposal: May 16, 2013 Time by which Proposals are Due: 2:00 P.M. (E.T.)

Title of Project: REPAIR ROOF, FIRE ALARM, FIRE SUPPRESSION, BUILDING 125, ROBINS, AFB

Proposals must be addressed as indicated below.

U.S. Army Engineer District, Savannah ATTN: CECT-SAS-E (Jennifer Casey) 100 West Oglethorpe Avenue Savannah, Georgia 31401-3640

The date and time of delivery established by commercial carriers is not the official time of receipt by the Government. Security Guards posted at the loading dock entry for the building do not receive proposals and will contact Mailroom personnel. Once Mailroom personnel are available, the proposal will be processed by the Security Guards using established security procedures and subsequently picked up by Mailroom personnel. After receipt by the Mailroom personnel, a record will be made of the receipt of the proposal. Completion of these actions will constitute delivery of the proposal by the date and time designated for receipt of proposals in Block 13 of the SF 1442.

Offerors are responsible for allowing sufficient time for the proposal to be processed for receipt and are cautioned that sufficient time may be as much as 24 hours prior to the date and time designated for receipt of proposals.

Offerors that use U.S. Mail or U.S. Express Mail must allow sufficient time for proposals to be received by Mailroom personnel by the time specified for receipt of proposals in Block 13 of the SF 1442. Offerors are responsible for allowing sufficient time for the proposal to be processed for receipt and are cautioned that sufficient time may be as much as 24 hours prior to the date and time designated for receipt of proposals.

The Government will not be responsible for proposals delivered to any location or to anyone other than those designated to receive proposals on its behalf. Offerors are responsible for ensuring that proposals are submitted so as to reach the office designated for receipt of proposals. Offerors are responsible for allowing sufficient time for the proposal to be physically received and processed by Mailroom personnel in accordance with the information provided.

time.

TECHNICAL MATTERS: Technical inquiries are to be submitted via Bidder Inquiry in ProjNet at www.projnet.org\projnet

All questions regarding this Request for Proposal (RFP) must be submitted in writing via Bidder Inquiry in ProjNet within no less than 10 calendar days prior to the date established in the RFP for receipt of proposals. The Government reserves the right to decline addressing questions received less than 10 calendar days prior to receipt of proposals.

If an Offeror believes that the requirements in this Request for Proposal contain an error, omission, or are otherwise unsound; the offeror shall immediately notify the Contract Specialist in writing with supporting rationale. The Offeror is reminded that the Government reserves the right to award this Request for Proposal based on the initial proposal, as received, without discussion.

To submit and review bid inquiry items, bidders will need to be a current registered user or self-register into system. To self-register go to web page, click BID tab select Bidder Inquiry, select agency USACE, enter Key for this solicitation listed below, and your e-mail address, click login.

Fill in all required information and click create user. Verify that information on next screen is correct and click continue. From this page you may view all bidder inquiries or add inquiry.

Bidders will receive an acknowledgement of their question via email, followed by an answer to their question after it has been processed by our technical team.

W912HN-13-R-0010

Replace Roof, Fire Alarm, Fire Suppression, Building 125 Robins AFB, GA Bidder Inquiry Key: 4RJ82Q-PKWAQ9

CONSTRUCTION COST LIMITATION FOR DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION COSTS

The contract award for design and construction shall not exceed $40,303,401.00 for this project.

Offerors are under no obligation to approach this amount. However, the Government may not be able make an award, if the dollar amount set for this project is exceeded.

Section 00100 - Bidding Schedule/Instructions to Bidders

SECTION 00100

SECTION V

SECTION 00100

PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS AND INSTRUCTIONS

1. OVERVIEW.

1.1 This Request for Proposal (RFP) solicits for a single C-Type Contract using a Two (2) Phase Solicitation Process for Replace Roof, Fire Alarm, Fire Suppression Building 125 Robins AFB, GA. .

(See solicitation section 00010 for the complete scope of the anticipated contract to be awarded under this RFP.)

1.2 The purpose of the Source Selection plan is to establish a uniform evaluation procedure for the technical evaluation of proposals by the Source Selection Evaluation Board (SSEB) and the development of the Best Value Decision by the Source Selection Authority (SSA) using the Trade-Off Process (See Federal Acquisition Regulation 15.101-1). In as much as the proposal shall describe the capability of the Offeror to perform the resulting contract, the proposal should be specific and complete in every detail as well as be prepared simply and economically, providing a straightforward and concise description of capabilities to satisfactorily perform the contract.

1.3 For the purposes of this solicitation, the Government will utilize the Two (2) Phase Solicitation Process for this Design Build project. In Phase 1 of the two phase design-build selection procedure, interested Offeror’s submit certain specified performance capability proposals for review and consideration by the Government.

1.4 The Government will evaluate the performance capability proposals in accordance with the criteria described herein and will select up to five (5) of the highest rated Offeror’s to participate in Phase 2.

1.5 In Phase 2 of this process, the Government will evaluate both technical capability and price.

1.6 Only those Offeror’s who receive a written notification from the Savannah District Contracting Officer that their firm has been selected to participate in Phase 2 of this solicitation are invited to submit a Phase 2 proposal. The Government intends to announce the name of Offeror’s selected for Phase 2 in the FEDBIZOPS website. An Offeror that does not want this information released must provide a written notification and explanation of its objections to release of the information. Those Offeror’s selected for Phase 2 will be provided the technical requirements package for the contract.

2. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

2.1 Firms formally organized as design-build entities, design firms and construction contractors that have associated specifically for performance of this contract, consortia of firms, or any other interested parties may submit proposals. A design firm or construction contractor may offer more than one proposal by entering into more than one association. Associations may be joint ventures or include key team subcontractors. Any legally organized Offeror may submit a proposal.

2.2 Contractor Team Arrangements. Contractor Team Arrangements are considered an arrangement in which (1) two or more companies form a partnership or joint venture to act as a potential prime contractor; or (2) a potential prime contractor agrees with one or more other companies to have them act as its subcontractors under a specified Government contract or acquisition program. In accordance with FAR Subpart 9.6, the Government will recognize the integrity and validity of contractor team arrangements; provided, the arrangements are identified and company relationships are fully disclosed in the offer. The Offeror shall identify the major or critical aspects of the requirement to be performed by those identified in the Contractor Team Arrangement. The submission must contain a narrative that clearly explains the relevance to a particular factor of information concerning a company that is part of a Contractor Team Arrangement. The Government will consider the adequacy of this explanation in deciding the relevance of the information to this procurement. Any narrative provided should be incorporated into the Offeror’s proposal at Tab E.

2.3 Notwithstanding the specific requirements of any other area of the RFP, information submitted about any company other than the Offeror, whether a predecessor company, affiliated company, subsidiary (including wholly owned subsidiaries), or subcontractors that will perform major or critical aspects of this requirement, or other associated business, WILL NOT be evaluated for any factor unless the proposal contains a detailed narrative explaining why this submitted information is relevant to this acquisition. The Government will consider the adequacy of this explanation in deciding the relevance and weight, if any, of the information to this procurement. Where information about a subcontractor is properly submitted and given significant weight during the evaluation, the failure of the Offeror to actually perform with that subcontractor may be grounds for termination for default. Any narrative provided should be incorporated into the Offeror’s proposal at Tab E.

2.4 Offerors shall submit their proposal to the address shown in Block 7 of Standard Form 1442.

2.5 Proposals are due no later than the time and date specified in Block 13 of Standard Form 1442.

3. GENERAL PROPOSAL FORMAT -- PHASE 1 & PHASE 2:

3.1 Title Page. Include the title of the solicitation, solicitation number, Offeror name, and date of the submittal.

3.2 Table of Contents. Each volume of the proposal shall contain a detailed table of contents. If more than one binder is used, the complete table of contents shall be included in each. Any materials submitted but not required by this solicitation (such as company brochures) shall be relegated to appendices.

3.3 Printed Matter Submissions. Written material shall be on 8 ½ x 11 inch paper printed in no less than a 10 pitch or 10 font. Page limitations, where specified in the RFP, shall be considered a maximum.

Pages in excess of any specified limitation shall not be evaluated. A single 8 ½ x 11 inch sheet with written material on one side only shall constitute one page. However, if both sides of the sheet bear written material then this single sheet shall be counted as two pages.

3.4 Binders. Proposals shall be submitted in tabbed, three ring binders.

3.5 Number of Copies. Offerors SHALL submit a hard copy of the original Volume I and a hard copy of the original Volume II for Phase 1. Offerors SHALL also submit five (5) additional hard copies of Volume II and one (1) electronic copy of Volume II on a CD for Phase 1. Given the limited time and resources of the evaluation board, failure to provide the requisite number of copies may hinder the board's ability to evaluate the Offeror's proposal. Failure to provide any copies of Volume I or Volume II may result in the Offeror’s proposal being determined ineligible for award. For those Offeror’s invited to participate in Phase 2, Offeror’s shall submit an original of Volume One and an original and five (5) hard copies of Volume Two.

3.6 Electronic Submission. In addition to the hard copies required in paragraph 3.5, all Offerors that advance to Phase 2 shall submit portions of the proposal on a CD-ROM. This includes the Phase 1 submission and Volume II of the Phase 2 submission, including all drawings. Written portions of the proposal should be in MS Word or Adobe Acrobat PDF format. The electronic version shall be either a single file tabbed in the same order as the hard copy or multiple files hyperlinked to a single table of contents. Drawings should be in one of the following formats: Microstation DGN, Adobe Acrobat PDF, Max View CAL (with Sendable INDEX,SVD), or Auto Cad DWG. Any portion of the proposal not available in electronic format, i.e. cut sheets, should be scanned in Adobe Acrobat PDF format. The CD- ROM must be clearly labeled by solicitation number, project name, installation, and Offeror’s name. In the event of any conflict between the electronic submission and the hard copy submission, the hard copy submission will govern and will be the material upon which the Government bases its evaluation and ultimately, its decision.

3.7 Drawings. For Offerors invited to participate in Phase 2, drawings submitted for the proposal may be done with any CADD software available to the Offeror. However, the drawings for 60% and Final design submittals will be done and submitted in the latest version of Microstation format only. Conversions from Microstation are discouraged because of the file incompatibility and the added work necessary for the conversion.

3.8 Tabs. See paragraph 8 for Phase 2 specific tabbing requirements. Phase 1 proposal shall be organized and tabbed as follows:

VOLUME I Phase 1 & 2

TAB A – Standard Form 1442, completed and signed by authorized individual(s) of the Offeror. Offers submitted in the name of a Joint Venture must be signed in accordance with the terms and conditions specified in the joint venture agreement as evidenced in the proposal.

TAB B – Proposal Pricing Schedule (for Phase 2 only), Section 00010—Schedule A.

TAB C - Section 00600 – Representations and Certifications.

TAB D – Proposal Data Sheet – See Attachment 1 provided at the end of this section. Offerors should ensure telephone number, fax number, e-mail address and DUNS number are all included. The DUNS number provided will be used to access Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) data. If a separate DUNS has been created for a joint venture (J-V) it must be submitted. A DUNS number shall also be provided for each company identified in any other proposed association of firms or Contractor Team Arrangement. The Offeror should also submit their Tax ID number on the proposal data sheet.

TAB E – Teaming Agreements and Narratives, if applicable. See paragraph 2.2 and 2.3.

PHASE 1 VOLUME II

TAB E –Teaming Agreement (Duplicate of Volume I)

TAB F– FACTOR 1 Past Performance

TAB G – FACTOR 2 Design Experience

4. Phase 1 TAB F—FACTOR 1 –PAST PERFORMANCE

4.1 SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS.

4.1.1 The Offeror shall demonstrate a record of performance on recent relevant projects using the Past Performance Questionnaire Summary Sheet, Attachment 2 and the Past Performance Questionnaire, Attachment 3 at the end of this section. The Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) is provided for the offeror or its team members to submit to the client (Point of Contact) for each relevant project submitted.

Offeror must ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client. Completed PPQs must be submitted with your proposal by the specified closing date and time. Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a point of contact for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the Offeror shall complete blocks 1 – 5 of the PPQ and submit it with the proposal. Please note that, at a minimum, this first page of the PPQ must contain sufficient information for the government to determine the relevancy of the project. In addition, this will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). The Government may call and confirm information provided by the Offeror on the PPQs with the points of contact, to the extent necessary to verify the information in the PPQ or to obtain additional information. The Government reserves the right to interview other individuals if the point of contact is not available. By exception, the client may request, submission of questionnaires directly to the Government’s point of contact (Contract Specialist), Constance McLamore. Request may be made via email to constance.v.mclamore@usace.army.mil. This request must be coordinated by the client in advance not later than 5 business days before the proposal due date. PPQ’s submitted directly to the Contract Specialist shall be mailed via trackable means (certified US Mail, FedEx, UPS). If the PPQ fails to arrive before the closing date and time, or if the information on the PPQ is insufficient to determine the Offeror name and appropriate solicitation number, it will not be considered.

Offerors are cautioned that the information submitted pertaining to a project shall be limited to the PPQ form and shall contain enough information to determine relevancy of a project. Likewise, Project Information submitted in a format other than or in lieu of the PPQ (to include CCASS /ACASS) will not be considered. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation. Offerors may submit PPQ submitted on other procurements.

In addition to the PPQ, the Offeror’s proposal shall include the Past Performance Questionnaire Summary Sheet (Attachment 2) to provide a summary of the PPQs included and/or submitted to clients. The summary sheet at a minimum shall include the following: 1) Project name; 2) Team member submitting the project; 3) Contract Number; 4) Construction percent completed at the time of the solicitation; 5) Scheduled completion date; and 6) Indicate if the project was design-bid-build, design build or CMS at Risk.

The offeror may include performance recognition documents received within the last five (5) years for only the projects submitted, such as awards, award fee determinations, customer letters of commendation, and any other forms of performance recognition. Performance recognition documents shall not exceed eight (8) documents for the entire team.

Offerors should identify state and local government and private contracts that are similar to the Government’s requirements described in 4.1.2 and 4.2.2. If the Offeror is a joint venture, each firm shall provide information, demonstrating experience relevant to their expected role on this contract. If any firm has multiple functions or divisions, limit the project examples to those performed by the division, unit or team member submitting the offer.

4.1.2. Offeror shall submit projects with a minimum value of no less than $20 Million dollars and demonstrate new or replacement roof, fire alarm/suppression system construction or renovation work.

Projects shall be similar in scope and magnitude of effort and complexities as this solicitation requires.

Projects submitted must be recent, successfully completed, or substantially completed (fully designed and at least 50% construction progress completed) within five (5) years preceding the date of this solicitation.

Projects that meet this criterion will be evaluated on how relevant they are compared to the effort to be acquired through this procurement. Reference paragraph 4.2.2 for specific characteristics of relevant projects.

4.1.3. Offerors shall submit no more than five (5) PPQs (Attachment 3). Project information shall be limited to the PPQ. Additional project information attached to the PPQ will not be evaluated.

Where a project was awarded as a task order or delivery order under an IDIQ type contract, offerors are cautioned to submit information specific to the task or delivery order considered relevant to the requirements of this RFP, rather than the umbrella contract. For purposes of this Request for Proposal, if the Offeror represents the combining of two or more companies in a Contract Team Arrangement as defined in paragraph 2.2 above, no more than five (5) total project examples may be submitted for the entire team. If an Offeror submits more than five (5) total project examples, only the first five (5) will be evaluated. Offerors are advised to submit projects wherein the Offeror, or proposed team members, played a significant role and to clearly define those roles.

4.1.4 If any firm has multiple functions or divisions, limit the project examples to those performed by the division, unit or team member submitting the offer.

4.1.5 While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the offeror must provide detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information for evaluation by the Government.

4.1.6 The experience and/or past performance of individuals will NOT be considered under this factor.

4.2 EVALUATION CRITERIA PHASE 1.

4.2.1 Past Performance Evaluation. The past performance evaluation results in an assessment of the Government’s confidence in the ability of the Offeror to meet the solicitation requirements. The past performance evaluation considers each Offeror’s demonstrated record of performance on recent and relevant projects that involve a similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities as this solicitation requires. One performance confidence assessment rating is assigned for each Offeror after evaluating the Offeror’s recent past performance, focusing on performance that is relevant to the contract requirements.

4.2.2 Relevancy Evaluation: Projects will only be evaluated that meet the recency requirements such that they are successfully completed, or substantially completed (fully designed and a least 50% construction progress completed) within five (5) years preceding the date of this solicitation. Projects must have the minimum value of $20M and demonstrate new construction or replacement/renovation type work as referenced in paragraph 4.1.2. Projects that meet the criteria in 4.1.2 will be evaluated to determine how relevant the projects are compared to the effort to be acquired through this solicitation. Aspects of relevant projects include similarity of scope, type of work, complexity, contract type, and the degree of subcontracting or teaming proposed by the Offeror. Projects will be evaluated using, but not limited to, the characteristics identified below. The characteristics identified are not intended to be a comprehensive list. However, projects that meet the criteria in 4.1.2 and that also include the criteria below may be considered more relevant. The project description in section 4 of the PPQ shall include the characteristics of the projects.

Design Build experience Large Galbestos Roof and Fire System replacement projects:

20,000 SF or more that involved complete removal and replacement of galbestos roofing; or 20,000 SF or more buildings completely refurbished, where roofing have been replaced and fire protection have been upgraded to code; or 20,000 SF or more historic structure that has had the barrel roof replaced with the majority of their fire protection, upgraded, while maintaining their exterior historic appearance and finishes.

New continuous roof panel (greater than 75 feet per continuous panel) installation on barrel type roofs.

Hazardous heavy metal dust cleanup in existing buildings greater than 20,000 SF.

The role of the offeror or team member on submitted projects is similar to or more significant than the role the offeror or team member is expected to perform on this contract.

4.2.3 The Government will not consider multiple projects, such as individual task orders, combined to meet the minimum value.

4.2.4 Relevancy. There are four levels of relevancy as shown in the following Table. With respect to relevancy, more relevant past performance will typically be a stronger predictor of future success and have more influence on the past performance confidence assessment than past performance of lesser relevance.

Past Performance Relevancy Ratings.

Ratings Definitions Very Relevant Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Relevant Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Somewhat Relevant

Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

4.2.5 The Government will evaluate the Offeror's past performance using the sources available to it including but not limited to: the example projects identified by the Offeror and submitted on the PPQs and any additional information received from references, ACASS, and CCASS or other sources. Offerors may be provided an opportunity to address any negative past performance information about which the Offeror has not previously had an opportunity to respond if such information is determined to impact the rating to be assessed.

4.2.6 The Government will consider past performance of the prime construction contractor and the design firm, (or the prime contractor if design is to be self-performed). If a firm has multiple functions or divisions, the Government will only evaluate the past performance of the unit or division submitting the offer. The Government may also consider the past performance information submitted on any other team member. However, in accordance with paragraphs 2.2 and 2.3, above, the consideration and weight given to past performance information concerning other than the prime contractor will be based on the extent of involvement of the team member in the project and the adequacy of the proposal in identifying and addressing such arrangements and roles. Past performance information submitted on a team member who does not perform a major or critical role on the project or whose role has not been clearly or adequately described as required will not be considered. Where the Government views an Offeror’s role, or that of its team members, if any, as not significant or as not clearly defined, the Government reserves the right to view this lack of involvement, or clarity, as affecting the determination of relevancy and the usefulness of the information in determining a confidence rating despite the quality of recent, relevant past performance information.

4.2.7 Other Sources. In addition to the above, the Government may review any other sources other than those provided by the Offeror for evaluating past performance. These other sources may include but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), including Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), using all CAGE/DUNS numbers of team members (partnership, joint venture, teaming arrangement, or parent company/subsidiary/affiliate) identified in the proposal on the Proposal Data Sheet, inquiries of owner representative(s), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), and any other known sources not provided by the offeror. The Government will also consider available CCASS ratings on relevant projects submitted by the Offeror under this factor and may consider up to five (5) additional CCASS ratings on recent, relevant projects as needed to evaluate past performance for any team member. The Government will consider available ACASS ratings on all relevant projects submitted by the Offeror under Factor 1, Past Performance, and may consider up to five (5) additional ACASS ratings on recent, relevant projects as needed to evaluate past performance.

4.2.8 The Government will consider the relevant past performance information, source of this information, context of the data, and general trends in contractor performance on recent projects to reach a performance confidence assessment using the ratings in 4.2.11.

4.2.9 If no recent/relevant performance record is available or the Offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned this factor will be assigned a rating of “Unknown Confidence (Neutral).

4.2.10 Past Performance Confidence Ratings

4.2.10.1 SUBSTANTIAL CONFIDENCE - Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

4.2.10.2 SATISFACTORY CONFIDENCE - Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

4.2.10.3 LIMITED CONFIDENCE - Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

4.2.10.4 NO CONFIDENCE - Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

4.2.10.5 UNKNOWN CONFIDENCE (NEUTRAL) - No recent/relevant performance record is available or the Offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.

5. Phase 1 TAB G—FACTOR 2- DESIGN EXPERIENCE

5.1 SUBMISSION REQUIRMENTS: The Offeror shall demonstrate its capability to perform design work as required under this contract using the Standard Form 330 (SF330). The Offeror is required to complete ALL sections of Part I and Part II of the SF330. Directions for the Standard Form 330 can be found at Attachment 4. The Government will evaluate the completed SF330.

5.1.1 Specialized Experience and Technical Competence. No more than five (5) total project examples may be submitted for the entire A-E team, even if the proposed Architect-Engineer Firm represents the combining of two or more companies. If more than five (5) projects are submitted, only the first five (5) will be evaluated. Projects must be at least 50% design progress completed or successfully completed within five (5) years preceding the date of this solicitation. Projects shall be identified in Section F of the SF330. These projects should demonstrate experience and technical competence in the design of projects containing the criteria for relevant projects with regards to dollar value and type of work specified in paragraph 4.2.2.

5.1.2 Staffing and Professional Qualifications. In Section E of the SF330, provide professional qualifications (appropriate education, experience and professional registration) for the following disciplines:

a. Architect (required)

b. Structural Engineer (required)

c. Fire Protection Engineer (required)

d. Certified Industrial Hygienist(required)

5.1.3 Design Standards and Practices. The Architect-Engineer Firm must submit a narrative, using Section H of the SF330. Section H of the SF330 shall not exceed two (2) pages. This two (2) page narrative shall demonstrate the firm’s capability to perform the following:

a. Sustainable development and design for new or replacement roofs and fire suppression/alarm systems, and;

b. Comply with the uniform facility criteria documents and the military base installation design guides;

c. Seal designs;

d. Attend meetings; perform site visits and surveys at the installations within 48 hours of Government notification;

e. Prepare design files in AUTOCAD formats and BIM Model and associated Facility Data files in Bentley Systems BIM platform

5.2 EVALUATION CRITERIA:

5.2.1 Specialized Experience and Technical Competence. The Government will evaluate all information available to determine depth of experience and competence. The Government may contact and interview the points of contact and reserves the right to interview other individuals if the points of contacts are not available.

5.2.2 Staffing and Professional Qualifications. The Government will evaluate the proposed staffing and qualifications of the staffing. Lack of staffing or qualifications may result in lack of efficiency and delays in accomplishment of work when engineering disciplines must be added to accomplish design.

5.2.3 Design Standards and Practices. Offerors will be evaluated on their ability to design roofs and fire suppression/alarm systems to comply with applicable building codes, uniform facility criteria documents and installation design guides, seal designs, report to the construction site within 48 hours of Government notification, prepare design files in AUTOCAD formats, and BIM Model and associated Facility Data files in Bentley Systems BIM platform.

5.2.4. Factor 2 Evaluation Standards. Factor 2 will be rated using the following adjectival descriptions.

The information in the SF330 must clearly establish that the Offeror’s submittal meets the definitions established below.

5.2.4.1 OUTSTANDING - Proposal meets requirements and indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements. Strengths far outweigh any weaknesses. Risk of unsuccessful performance is very low.

5.2.4.2 GOOD - Proposal meets requirements and indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements. Proposal contains strengths which outweigh any weaknesses. Risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

5.2.4.3 ACCEPTABLE - Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. Strengths and weaknesses are offsetting or will have little or no impact on contract performance. Risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

5.2.4.4 MARGINAL - Proposal does not clearly meet requirements and has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. The proposal has one or more weaknesses which are not offset by strengths. Risk of unsuccessful performance is high.

5.2.4.5 UNACCEPTABLE - Proposal does not meet requirements and contains one or more deficiencies. Proposal is unawardable.

6. PHASE 1 PROPOSAL EVALUATION.

6.1 The SSEB will be established to conduct the evaluation of proposals received in response to this solicitation. The evaluation will be based on the content of the proposal, proposal revisions and any information obtained from other sources, e.g. past performance information. The SSEB will not consider any documents incorporated by reference, except as expressly allowed by this solicitation.

6.2 Each member of the SSEB will independently consider all information provided in the proposal.

Once these individual analyses are completed, the SSEB will assign a consensus rating for each evaluation factor. It is the responsibility of each member of the SSEB to provide and document sufficient strengths, weaknesses, and/or deficiencies to support the assigned rating for each factor. Comments are required for all ratings.

6.3 The final ratings on individual factors, to include all support documentation, will be provided to the Source Selection Authority. The Source Selection Authority, independently exercising prudent business judgment, will determine which Offerors will be selected to participate in Phase 2.

6.4 No proposal which receives a confidence level of Limited Confidence or No Confidence will be selected to participate in Phase 2 regardless of the total number of proposals received.

6.5 Offeror’s are cautioned to put forth their best efforts for the Phase 1 submission, and to furnish all information clearly to allow the Government to determine their performance capability. Offeror’s should not assume that they will have an opportunity to clarify or correct anything in the proposal after submitting it in response to Phase 1.

ATTACHMENT 1

TAB D

PROPOSAL DATA SHEET

Replace Roof, Fire Alarm, Fire Suppression, Building 125 Robins AFB, GA

1. Offeror:

Address:

Phone:

Fax:

E-mail:

DUNS # (used for accessing CCASS) Tax ID #

Please include name, address, and DUNS number of any proposed team members as defined in paragraph 2.2 of the RFP. (Note: Information regards the nature of team associations and such should NOT be included here. IAW Section 00100, paragraph 2.2 provide at Tab E.)

Team Member:

Team Member:

Team Member:

2. AUTHORIZED NEGOTIATORS. FAR 52.215-11

The Offeror represents that the following persons are authorized to negotiate on its behalf with the Government in connection with this Request for Proposals (RFP).

[List names, titles, and telephone number of the authorized negotiator.]

Name of Person Authorized to Negotiate:

Negotiator's Address:

Negotiator's Telephone:

Negotiator’s E-mail:

ATTACHMENT 2

TAB H

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE SUMMARY SHEET

Replace Roof, Fire Alarm, Fire Suppression, Building 125 Robins AFB, Georgia

The Offeror’s proposal shall include the Past Performance Questionnaire Summary Sheet to provide a summary of the PPQs included and/or submitted to clients. The summary sheet at a minimum shall include the following:

1) Project name; 2) Team member submitting the project; 3) Construction percent completed at the time of the solicitation; 4) Scheduled completion date; and 5) Indicate if the project was design-bid-build, design build or CMS at Risk.

No.

Project Name

Contractor

Contract# Construction % Complete @

Time of Solicitation

Scheduled

Completion Date

Design Build or Design Bid Build or CMS at Risk?

ATTACHMENT 3

TAB H

(Page 1 of 2)

(Adobe fill-able format available for this questionnaire as a separate attachment)

NAVFAC/USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ-0)

CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)

1. Contractor Information

Firm Name: CAGE Code:

Address: DUNs Number:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:

2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain)

Percent of project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):

3. Contract Information

Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please specify):

Contract Title:

Contract Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Explain Differences:

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):

Explain Differences (see previous page):

4. Project Description:

Complexity of Work High Med Routine

How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)

CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 6-8)

5. Client Information

Name:

Title:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

6. Describe the client’s role in the project:

7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):

8. Client’s Signature:

NOTE: USACE REQUESTS THAT THE CLIENT COMPLETES THIS QUESTIONNAIRE AND SUBMITS DIRECTLY BACK TO THE OFFEROR. THE OFFEROR WILL SUBMIT THE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO USACE WITH THEIR PROPOSAL, AND MAY DUPLICATE THIS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FUTURE SUBMISSION ON USACE SOLICITATIONS. CLIENTS ARE HIGHLY ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT QUESTIONNAIRES DIRECTLY TO THE OFFEROR. HOWEVER, BY EXCEPTION, QUESTIONNAIRES MAY BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO USACE.

PLEASE CONTACT THE OFFEROR FOR USACE POC INFORMATION. THE GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE

RIGHT TO VERIFY ANY AND ALL INFORMATION ON THIS FORM.

ATTACHMENT 3, TAB H

ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE

RATING DEFINITION NOTE

(E) Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.

An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

(VG) Very Good

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner.

There should have been no significant weaknesses…