Question and Answer for Solicitation W912GY26QA003 as of 3-5-26.pdf
PDF 45 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Fuel Hoses
- Solicitation number
- W912GY26QA003
About this file
This is a Questions and Answers document for federal solicitation W912GY26QA003, dated March 5, 2026. The document does not address specific products or services required, response dates, award dates, pricing terms, or other contract particulars. Instead, it clarifies three technical and specification matters raised by potential offerors.
The Q&A clarifications are: (1) the requirement is not brand-name specific and specifications are detailed in the "Continuation of Description" section on page 3 of the SF1449 form; (2) while the part number MID-TM60-6-50-BLK specifies black color, Tan is also acceptable as an alternative color option (NATO Green was questioned but not explicitly approved); and (3) the reference to standard MIL-H-53073 has been removed from the solicitation because all specifications align with MIL-PRF-370 and the two standards cannot be applied simultaneously. These clarifications provide flexibility on color selection and eliminate conflicting specification standards for offerors responding to this Army Corps of Engineers (W912GY) procurement.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Solicitation W912GY26QA003 Questions and Answers as of 3/5/2026
Question 1: Is this requirement "BRAND" name specific? Equal or better?
Answer 1: No, this is not a brand name specific requirement. Specifications are provided in the “Continuation of Description” section found on page 3 of the solicitation (SF1449).
Question 2: The specifications do not specify a color, however the part MID-TM60-6-50-BLK refers to Black. Is another color like Tan or NATO Green acceptable?
Answer 2: Tan is also acceptable.
Question 3: The reference to MIL-H-53073 should be removed, as all specifications align with MIL- PRF-370, and both standards cannot be applied simultaneously.
Answer 3: Reference to 81349-MIL-H-53073 is removed.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .