Questions and Answers for Solicitation W912GY25QA004 9-30-25.pdf
PDF 44 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Automatic Bagger
- Solicitation number
- W912GY25QA004
About this file
This document is a Questions and Answers (Q&A) file for Solicitation W912GY25QA004 for an Automatic Bagger. The Q&A addresses a specific inquiry about the Manufacturer's CAGE code and Part Number listed on the SF 1449 form for Contract Line Item (CLIN) 0001. The government clarifies that the previously listed manufacturer details were merely placeholders and not a brand-name requirement. Potential offerors are advised that an equivalent product meeting all salient characteristics is acceptable, and are directed to review the Continuation of Description for CLIN 0001 on page 4 of the solicitation for detailed specifications.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| W912GY25QA004.pdf | ||
| W912GY25QA004.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Questions and Answers for Solicitation W912GY25QA004 – Automatic Bagger
Question 1: On SF 1449 for CLIN 0001, the form lists Manufacturer’s CAGE 6C9F9 and Part Number R3200. Can you confirm if this constitutes a brand-name requirement, or may we propose an equal that meets all salient characteristics?
Answer 1: These were used as a placeholder for reference and are not to be used as a brand name requirement. The Manufacturer's Part Number and Manufacturer's CAGE have been removed from the solicitation for reference. While the R3200 does meet the specs, please see the Continuation of Description for CLIN 0001 found on page 4 of the solicitation for all salient characteristics. Yes, an equal that meets all salient characteristics is acceptable. Please see page 7 of the solicitation for the addendum to FAR 52.212-1.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .