B.07.01 W912EP23R0031 HHD Stilling Wells Pre-Proposal Conference Presentation 12-14.pptx
PPTX presentation 6 MB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W912EP23R0031
About this file
This pre-proposal conference presentation outlines requirements for a construction project solicitation to replace stilling wells at two pump stations on the Herbert Hoover Dike in Florida. The solicitation is identified as number W912EP23R0031 and is seeking offers for fabricating walkways, installing piles, conduit, instrumentation, and running data cables. The project value is between $1-5 million and is set aside for small businesses. Offerors must be NAICS code 237990. The completion deadline is 154 calendar days with liquidated damages of $2,412 per day. Proposals are due January 9, 2023 and will be evaluated for price and acceptability of technical experience and past performance. Acceptability will be determined based on the offeror's ability to meet the stated requirements.
View the file
Other files
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE
SOLICITATION NO. W912EP23R0031
HERBERT HOOVER DIKE REHABILITATION PROJECT, PUMP STATIONS S-4 & S-131 STILLING WELL REPLACEMENTS, GLADES COUNTY, FLORIDA
Thank you for joining, we will begin shortly.
Please mute your microphone.
Working Today to Build a Better Tomorrow
PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE: AGENDA
INTRODUCTION
PROJECT INFORMATION
EVALUATION CRITERIA
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS
OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS
Q&A SESSION
CLOSING REMARKS
INTRODUCTION
William Wallace, Contracting Officer
Rasheedah Sneeze, Contract Specialist
Kimberly Daniel-Ray, Deputy Small Business Program
PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE: PROJECT INFORMATION
SOLICITATION NUMBER: W912EP23R0031
PROJECT TITLE: HERBERT HOOVER DIKE REHABILITATION PROJECT, PUMP STATIONS S-4 & S-131 STILLING WELL REPLACEMENTS,GLADES COUNTY, FLORIDA
DESCRIPTION OF WORK: Construction includes fabricating a metal walkway, installing pre-stressed concrete piles, installing below and above grade electrical conduit, constructing a concrete walkway, acquiring, and installing stilling well instrumentation, and running data cable from the stilling well to the onsite control building.
MAGNITUDE OF CONSTRUCTION: $1,000,000 - $5,000,000.00
TYPE OF SOLICITATION & NAICS CODE: This is a 100% Small Business Set-Aside. The NAICS Code for this Project is 237990, Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction. The Small Business Size Standard is $45.0 Million.
PROJECT LOCATION: This project location will be at the Pump Station S-4 and Pump Station S-131 site(s)respectively. Pump Station S-4 is located on the south side of Lake Okeechobee between Clewiston Florida and Moore Haven Florida in Glades County. Pump Station S-131 is located on the north side of Lake Okeechobee east of Lakeport Florida in Glades County. Each pump station pumps water from the landside of Herbert Hoover Dike (HHD) into Lake Okeechobee.
52.211-10 COMMENCEMENT, PROSECUTION, AND COMPLETION OF WORK (APR 1984):
The Contractor shall be required to (a) commence work under this contract within 30 calendar days after the date the Contractor receives the notice to proceed, (b) prosecute the work diligently, and (c) complete the entire work ready for use not later than 154 calendar days after the Contractor receives the notice to proceed. The time stated for completion shall include final cleanup of the premises.
52.211-12 LIQUIDATED DAMAGES--CONSTRUCTION (SEP 2000):
If the Contractor fails to complete the work within the time specified in the contract, the Contractor shall pay liquidated damages to the Government in the amount of $2,412 for each calendar day of delay until the work is completed or accepted.
PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE: EVALUATION CRITERIA
EVALUATION: FAR Part 15 - The Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) Process is selected as appropriate for this acquisition because the best value is expected to result from selection of the lowest evaluated price proposal with an acceptable non-priced proposal (Technical and Past Performance). These non-priced factors will be evaluated on an “Acceptable” or “Unacceptable” basis. In order for an Offeror to be considered eligible for award, the proposal must receive an "Acceptable" rating in every non-priced factor
FACTOR 1 – Price
FACTOR 2 – Demonstrated Corporate Technical Experience
FACTOR 3 – Past Performance
FACTOR 1 – Price
This factor is not rated. Price is evaluated for reasonableness.
Check your math
FACTOR 2 – Demonstrated Technical Experience
This factor evaluates the Organizational Chart, Key Personnel Capabilities and Experience, Quality Control.
A letter of commitment (Attachment 2) must be provided as established under Factor 2 for each Major Subcontractor and each for individual submitted under the Key Project Personnel. Failure to provide a letter of commitment from a proposed major subcontractor or key personnel will be noted as a deficiency.
FACTOR 3 – Past Performance
Failure to provide a completed and signed NAVFAC/USACE Past Performance Questionnaire for each project as described above may result in this Factor being rated Unacceptable.
RATING SYSTEM
The SSEB will assign an adjective rating of “Acceptable”, or “Unacceptable” to each factor to reflect the Government's confidence in each offeror's technical ability, as demonstrated in its proposal, to perform the requirements stated in the Request for Proposal (RFP).
In order for an Offeror to be considered eligible for award, the proposal must receive an "Acceptable" rating in every non-priced factor
Offerors must receive a demonstrated corporate technical experience rating of “Acceptable,” in order to receive a rating of Technically Acceptable for Factor 2.
Ratings for the Demonstrated Corporate Technical Experience factor are shown below:
| Rating | Description |
| Acceptable | Proposal meets the requirements of the solicitation outlined in paragraph 3 |
| Unacceptable | Proposal does not meet the requirements of the solicitation. |
Offerors must receive a demonstrated corporate technical experience rating of “Acceptable,” in order to receive a rating of Technically Acceptable for Factor 2.
Ratings for Past Performance factor are shown below:
| Rating | Description |
| Acceptable | Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort or the offeror’s performance record is unknown. (See note below) |
| Unacceptable | Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government does not have a reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort. |
PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE:
Common ERRORS FOUND IN PROPOSALS
List of noted errors that are commonly found in proposals.
Notes for Factor 2: Demonstrated Technical Experience Letter of Commitments Submit all letter of commitments for key personnel and subcontractors Clearly identify the name and position of the person committing to perform the duties in the letter of commitment, especially for sub-contractors
Organization Chart Read the specifications within the solicitation. Make sure all communication and authority lines are clearly identified.
Follow the requirements for the org. chart and key personnel (which has specific requirements)
Organizational and Management Plans Safety and Quality Control requirements are within the contract and specific to USACE.
When approach to something is required, a list will not suffice. Describe the approach.
Resources, roles, and responsibilities are required for all contractors, including sub-contractors.
Resumes Ensure to follow the instructions; projects and dates to confirm experience are required.
Personnel submitted for consideration shall demonstrate in the resume that they have the experience required in the solicitation.
PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE:
Common ERRORS FOUND IN PROPOSALS
CONTINUED: List of noted errors that are commonly found in proposals.
5. Ensure to schedule for the duration required in the contract
6. Schedule shall be in calendar days. Read carefully how it will be prepared and how it will be evaluated.
7. Include all milestones and activities specified in the Solicitation; the contract provides detailed information for each item listed.
8. A single bare fore Pre-Construction submittals is not acceptable.
9. Government review periods are established in the contract; read the specifications.
10. Offeror shall provide a thorough narrative to touch on all points required in the solicitation.
PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE: SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS
SUBMISSION METHOD:
The Offeror’s proposal must be received by the Government no later than the date/time specified in the solicitation and cited above. Offerors shall submit their proposal using the following link: https://piee.eb.mil/
For instructions on how to post an offer, please refer to the Posting Offer demo in the following link: https://pieetraining.eb.mil/wbt/xhtml/wbt/sol/index.xhtml
Please submit proposals utilizing the link above to Contracting Officer William Wallace at William.J.Wallace@usace.army.mil and carbon copy (CC) Contract Specialist, Rasheedah Sneeze at Rasheedah.S.Sneeze@usace.army.mil. (See 00100A Proposal Requirements and Submission Format paragraph).
SUBMISSION TIME & DATE: Offers are due on January 09, 2023 at 2:00PM, EST
INSTRUCTIONS FOR TECHNICAL INQUIRIES AND QUESTIONS:
ProjNet closes on December 30, 2023 at 05:00 pm, Local Time.
Inquiries must be entered into ProjNet for an official answer.
PAYMENT AND PERFORMANCE BONDS: must be furnished within 10 calendar days after award.
PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE: OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS
AMENDMENTS:
Amendment 0001 issued on 08 December 2023
All Amendments must be acknowledged on the SF1442.
PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE: OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS
PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE: Q&a image8.png image9.png image10.png image11.png image12.svg image1.png image2.png image3.tif image4.tif image5.png image6.png image7.png
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .