B.07.01_Pre-Proposal Conference Slides_21R0007.pptx
PPTX presentation 840 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W912EP21R0007
About this file
This document provides details for a federal contract solicitation to perform maintenance dredging of the Anclote River in Pinellas and Pasco Counties, Florida. The scope of work includes dredging the 9-foot channel and turning basin and transporting the material to a temporary upland dredged material management area to be constructed. Incidental work comprises endangered species monitoring, sea turtle trawl capture and relocation for hopper dredges, bird monitoring, and gopher tortoise capture and relocation. Offerors must submit proposals through the DoD Secure Access File Exchange by April 5, 2021. The award will be made based on best value determined by evaluating technical merit and past performance. This is a small business set-aside with a performance period of approximately 365 days and a contract value estimated between $1,000,000 and $5,000,000. The soliciting agency is the Department of the Army Corps of Engineers Engineering District Jacksonville.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Anclote River Maintenance Dredging, 9-Foot Project, Pinellas and Pasco Counties, Florida
US Army Corps of Engineers
BUILDING STRONG®
Pre-Proposal Conference March 12, 2021
Halis Batista, Contract Specialist Claurice Dingle, Contracting Officer
BUILDING STRONG®
Agenda Welcome and Introduction Ground Rules Project Overview Business/Contracting Processes Source Selection Proposal and Related Evaluation Factors Definitions Ratings Submissions ProjNet Contact Information
Rules for the Pre-Proposal Conference Unofficial and non-binding
If there is any conflict between the information discussed during this conference and the solicitation, the terms and conditions of the solicitation will govern
Project Overview The scope of work for this project consists of maintenance dredging for the 9-foot Anclote River Channel and Turning Basin, a required depth of 9 feet with a 1-foot allowable overdepth. The resulting material will be transported to and placed in a temporary upland dredged material management area (DMMA) to be constructed as part of this contract. Excavating and disposal of dredged material from the DMMA and deconstruction of the DMMA are not part of this contract. Work incidental to dredging includes endangered species monitoring and turbidity monitoring.
The DMMA will consist of an earthen-diked containment basin with a corrugated metal half-pipe an wier dewatering structure. Incidental work associated with construction and operation of the DMMA includes processing borrow onsite, importing fill in the event the borrow onsite is insufficient, gopher tortoise capture and relocation, installation of land-based pipeline, installation of three buried pipeline street crossings, traffic control, fencing, bird monitoring, and turbidity monitoring.
Project Overview This is for a single award contract for Anclote River Maintenance Dredging 9-Foot Project in Pinellas and Pasco Counties, Florida.
Total Small Business Set-Aside
The period of performance is approximately 365 calendar days after Notice to Proceed.
The magnitude of construction is estimated between $1,000,000.00 and $5,000,000.00.
Source Selection BASIS FOR AWARD: Best Value Trade-Off
The Government will award one (1) Firm Fixed Price contract that is considered fair and reasonable with regard to pricing and whose proposal offers the best overall value to the Government, considering the price and non-price factors described in the solicitation.
Source Selection The Government intends to make award without holding discussions with offerors unless the Contracting Officer/Source Selection Authority later determines it to be necessary.
Contractors submitting an offeror as a joint venture must provide a written copy of the joint venture agreement with the initial proposal. The joint venture must be signed by both parties. The SF 1442 and all future documents must also be signed by both parties.
The joint venture must be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) as a joint venture in order for an award to be made.
Debarred List: Offerors will be checked in SAM to ensure there are no exclusions listed. Any offeror who is listed with exclusions will be eliminated without further considerations.
Proposal and Evaluation Factors
FACTOR 1 : Technical Merit Element 1 – Technical Approach Plan Element 2 – Construction Schedule Any conflicts between Element 1 and Element 2 may be noted as weakness.
FACTOR 2 : Past Performance FACTOR 3: Price and Price Related Information
Factor 1, Technical Merit is equal to Factor 2, Past Performance. All evaluation factors other than price, when combined are significantly more important than price.
Definitions Deficiency: A material failure of a proposal to meet a Government requirement or a combination of significant weaknesses in a proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level. See FAR 15.001.
Weakness: A flaw in the proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance. See FAR 15.001.
Significant Weakness: A flaw in the proposal that appreciably increase the risk of unsuccessful contract performance.
Strength: An aspect of a proposal that, when judged against a stated evaluation criterion, enhances the merit of the proposal or increases the probability of successful performance of the contract.
Significant Strength: A significant strength appreciably enhances the merit of a proposal or appreciably enhances the probability of successful contract performance.
Deviation: Proposal implies or specifically offers a deviation below the specified criteria. The offeror may or may not have called the deviation to the Government’s attention. A deviation is a deficient. The proposal must conform to the solicitation requirements for award.
Combined Technical/Ratings
Color Rating Adjectival Rating Description
| Blue | Outstanding | Proposal indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements and contains multiple strengths, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low. |
| Purple | Good | Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and contains at least one strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low to moderate. |
| Green | Acceptable | Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate. |
| Yellow | Marginal | Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is high. |
| Red | Unacceptable | Proposal does not meet requirements of the solicitation, and thus, contains one or more deficiencies, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is unacceptable. Proposal is unawardable. |
Past Performance Ratings
Past Performance Relevancy Rating Definitions
| Adjectival Rating | Description |
| Very Relevant | Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation |
requires.
Relevant Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.
Somewhat Relevant Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.
Not Relevant Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.
Past Performance Ratings
Past Performance Confidence Assessments Rating Definitions
| Adjectival Rating | Description |
| Substantial Confidence | Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. |
| Satisfactory Confidence | Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. |
| Neutral Confidence | No recent/relevant performance record is available, or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. The offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance. |
| Limited Confidence | Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. |
| No Confidence | Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort. |
Submitting the Proposal Offerors shall utilize the DoD Secure Access File Exchange (DoD SAFE) at https://safe.apps.mil/ system for proposal submission.
Submit proposals in Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF).
Email the Contract Specialist and the Contracting Officer to request the Upload Code/Drop-Off.
DoD SAFE website will ask you to enter email addresses for the recipients. Enter the email addresses of the Contract Specialist and the Contracting Officer.
Submitting the Proposal Offerors are responsible for submitting a clear, well organized proposal. Proposals without the specified content stated in the solicitation may be determined Unacceptable and removed from the competition. The Government will not make assumptions concerning intent, capabilities, or experiences.
The Proposal shall contain the offeror’s Name/Address/Telephone Number/E-mail address, and if applicable: Table of Contents, List of Tables, List of Figures and/or List of Appendixes. No information may be incorporated into the proposal by reference.
Each filename shall begin with the solicitation number, followed by the word RESPONSE, followed by your firm’s name and finally a brief file description. Example: W912EP21R0007 RESPONSE Firmname Volume I
Instructions for Technical Inquiries and Questions
Technical inquiries and questions relating to this solicitation are to be submitted via Bidder Inquiry in ProjNet at https://www.projnet.org no later than March 26, 2021, close of business.
All timely questions and approved answers will be made available through ProjNet.
The Solicitation Number is: W912EP21R0007 The Bidder Inquiry Key is: 49WW4P-KD51RC
Instructions for Technical Inquiries and Questions Specific Instructions for ProjNet Bid Inquiry Access from ProjNet home page:
Identify the Agency. This should be marked as USACE.
Email. Enter the email address you would like to use for communication.
Key. Enter the Bidder Inquiry Key listed above.
Click Continue. A page will then open saying that a user account was not found and will ask you to create one using the provided form.
Enter your First Name, Last Name, Company, City, State, Phone, Email, Secret Question, Secret Answer, and Time Zone. Make sure to remember your Secret Question and Answer as they will be used from this point on to access the ProjNet system.
Click Add User. Once this is completed you are now registered within ProjNet and are currently logged into the system.
Instructions for Technical Inquiries and Questions Specific Instructions for Future ProjNet Bid Inquiry Access from ProjNet home page:
For future access to ProjNet, you will not be emailed any type of password. You will utilize your Secret Question and Secret Answer to log in.
Identify the Agency. This should be marked as USACE.
Email. Enter the email address you used to register previously in ProjNet.
Key. Enter the Bidder Inquiry Key listed above.
Click Continue. A page will then open asking you to enter the answer to your Secret Question.
Enter your Secret Answer and click Login. Once this is completed you are now logged into the system.
Contact Information Halis Batista, Contract Specialist Halis.L.Batista@usace.army.mil
Claurice Dingle, Contracting Officer Claurice.M.Dingle@usace.army.mil
Ms. Melisa Barbee, Deputy for Small Business Melisa.M.Barbee@usace.army.mil
Nicole Batista-Cruz, Small Business Specialist Nicole.M.Batista-Cruz@usace.army.mil image9.png image2.png image1.jpeg image3.jpeg image4.jpeg image5.jpeg image6.jpeg image7.png image8.png
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .