A22.W912EK22R0020 0001.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The reason for this amendment is to extend the offer due date, modify the SSP (changes can be found in yellow ), include Appendix D, delete

FAR clauses 5152.211-9000 and 5152.211-9001, modify FAR clauses 52.252-1, 52.211-10 and 52.228-1, add FAR clauses 52.217-5, 52.217-7 and 252.219-7003, update w age rates, modify a page in PLAN_SET_SOL-2022-06-06-L21_22_KEV_CONC_REPAIR, and upload compressed versions of a Plan Set and a Reference Images File, w hich w ere previously unable to be uploaded, to SAM.gov.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 80

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 06-Jul-2022

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W912EK22R0020

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

16-Jun-2022

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE

RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

22-Jun-2022

CODE

CONTRACTING DIVISION

US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS 1500 ROCK ISLAND D

ROCK ISLAND IL 61201

W912EK 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W912EK22R0020

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION 00010 - SOLICITATION CONTRACT FORM

The required response date/time has changed from 18-Jul-2022 02:00 PM to 25-Jul-2022 02:00 PM.

SECTION 00100 - BIDDING SCHEDULE/INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS

The following have been modified:

SOURCE SELECTION

A. BASIS FOR AWARD

This acquisition is a full and open, competitive procurement utilizing Lowest

Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) best value continuum source selection procedures in accordance with FAR 15.101-2.

A single award will be made to the Offeror who provides a technically acceptable proposal with the lowest evaluated price.

Proposed prices will be evaluated but not scored or otherwise combined with the other aspects of the proposal evaluation.

B. FACTORS TO BE EVALUATED

Factor 1: Price

Factor 2: Technical

Factor 3: Past Performance

C. EVALUATION APPROACH

All proposals will be evaluated by the Source Selection Team (SST). In order for any offeror to price factor. The two non-price factors are Technical and Past Performance.

Factor 1: Price

Price will be evaluated and considered but will not be scored or combined with other aspects of the proposal evaluation. An award will be made to the lowest priced, technically acceptable proposal. The lowest price will be determined by adding up all listed line items. Offerors shall complete and submit the Schedule of Prices with its proposal and include a price for each line item. Failure to submit a price for any of the required line items on the Schedule of Prices will roposal as ineligible for award. Offerors will be allowed one proposal submission.

unbalanced pricing is not present in accordance with FAR 15.404-1 to determine price reasonableness. Price reasonableness will be determined by comparing all proposed prices, the

Independent Government Estimate, and pricing of previous work that is equivalent or similar to the requirement.

The otherwise technically acceptable lowest priced Offeror may be required to confirm/validate their offered price. Certified cost and pricing data are not currently required; however, the

Government reserves the right to request such data prior to award.

Factor 2: Technical

The Government will evaluate the Technical Proposal on an Acceptable/Unacceptable basis.

This factor identifies the minimum requirements that are imperative to successful contract performance.

below to determine whether the technical proposal is Acceptable or Unacceptable. To be considered acceptable, all factors under the technical proposal must receive an acceptable rating. The adjectival rating depicts whether or not Proposal factor requirements.

Table C-1

Technical Proposal

Acceptable/Unacceptable Ratings

Rating Description

ACCEPTABLE Proposal meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

UNACCEPTABLE Proposal does not meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Subfactor 1: Schedule

Minimum requirements for this factor include a preliminary bar chart schedule showing the following activities, for each site as applicable, as outlined in Specification Section 01 14 00, WORK RESTRICTIONS:

a. Survey of existing lock components

b. Fabrication and delivery of traveling bitt

c. Upstream guidewall kevel rail replacement

d. Upstream guide wall checkpost removal

e. Upstream guide wall checkpost replacement

Technical Subfactor 1 construction contract.

f. Downstream guide wall checkpost replacement

g. Downstream guide wall resurfacing

h. Horizontal resurfacing of the lock wall

i. Vertical joint repairs on both walls

j. Electrical repairs

k. Commissioning

l. Curing of concrete

The Government will evaluate the schedule based on demonstration of all activities listed above being complete by the end of the lock closure period.

The Government will evaluate Subfactor 1: Schedule on an Acceptable/Unacceptable basis based on the descriptions outlined in Table C-2.

be eligible for award.

Table C-2. Subfactor 1: Schedule Evaluation Ratings

Rating Description

ACCEPTABLE The proposed Schedule includes all required activities and sequences, and shows completion of all activities by the end of the closure period. Based on the Schedule proposed by the

Offeror, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the

Offeror will successfully perform the required effort

UNACCEPTABLE The proposed Schedule does not include all required activities and/or sequences, or does not show completion of all activities by the end of the closure period. Based on the

Schedule proposed by the Offeror, the Government does not have a reasonable expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Subfactor 2: Experience

The Government will evaluate relevant experience of the Offeror, and/or committed sub-contractor. Relevant experience is what an Offeror, Joint Venture (JV), and/or committed sub-contractor(s), has done on past projects.

The Offeror shall submit a minimum of two (2) projects within the last ten (10) years which demonstrate experience in the following features of work:

1) Offeror or subcontractor must have at least one (1) project demonstrating experience with working on a lock or dam structure.

2) Offeror or subcontractor must have at least two (2) projects demonstrating experience with construction of concrete structures involving formwork over 4 feet high.

3) Offeror or subcontractor must have at least two (2) projects demonstrating experience with fabricating steel structures weighing more than 1000 pounds.

All information submitted must be accurate and complete. Project examples provided must be substantially complete. Substantially complete as defined for this solicitation is when the project is sufficient for the use of which it is intended, as of the closing date of this solicitation.

All project examples shall contain a Point of Contact (POC) as well as one alternate Point of

Contact, to include the name, job title of the POC, address, telephone, and e-mail address. The

POC and alternate shall be familiar with the scope and details of the project, and be a representative of the owner/customer/prime contractor, not affiliated with the Offeror. The POC and alternate shall be able to verify the experience cited.

For the purpose of this requirement, projects completed by a subcontractor cannot be submitted as relevant prior experience unless that subcontractor is expected to perform ten (10%) percent or more of the proposed effort.

For the purpose of this requirement, projects completed by a joint venture cannot be submitted as relevant prior experience unless that joint venture is expected to perform thirty-three (33%) percent or more of the proposed effort.

The Government will evaluate Subfactor 2: Experience on an Acceptable/Unacceptable basis based on the descriptions outlined in Table C-3.

will not be eligible for award.

Table C-3. Subfactor 2: Experience Evaluation Ratings

ACCEPTABLE Offerors (in combination with experience of their JV partners or committed key subcontractors) who provide examples of experience with the features of work described in the experience subfactor within the past ten (10) years will be determined to meet the minimum requirements of the contract and will be found Acceptable.

UNACCEPTABLE Offerors (in combination with the experience of their JV partners or committed key subcontractors) failing to provide examples of experience with the features of work described in the experience subfactor within the past ten (10) years will be found Unacceptable.

Factor 3: Past Performance previous construction projects. The Government will evaluate the information/performance data provided by Offerors. Evaluations of past performance shall be in accordance with this plan while utilizing the Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQ) and forms in Appendix D, Enclosure

1.

projects with a dollar value equal to, or greater than three million dollars. If more than five (5) are submitted, only the five (5) most recent projects will be considered. The forms shall identify whether the contract is active or complete, whether the contract was with a Government (federal, state, local, etc) or a commercial entity, and whether the Offeror was the prime contractor, a subcontractor, or member of a joint venture. The PPQ respondent must have been a client, or client representative, with whom the Offeror/subcontractor had a contract, or subcontract (if applicable) for one or more projects.

The PPQ respondent must hold, or have held at the time, a senior position in the client organization with responsibilities for either contract administration, quality control, engineering, or technical supervision, or was otherwise in a position to evaluate the Offeror performance in executing the contract or subcontract. The PPQ respondent must have first-hand knowledge of the performance.

In addition to the above, past performance information may be obtained from established systems such as the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), Federal

Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract

Reporting System (eSRS), or other databases; and may be obtained from other sources available to the Government, such as the Defense Contract Management Agency; and interviews with

Program Managers, Contracting Officers, and Fee Determining Officials.

The Government reserves the right to evaluate the past performance of any subcontractor proposal.

While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the Offeror.

The Government will evaluate the Past Performance factor on an Acceptable/Unacceptable basis based on the descriptions outlined in Table C-4.

will not be eligible for award.

Table C-4. Past Performance Evaluation Ratings

ACCEPTABLE Offerors whose past performance information demonstrates all of the elements being rated at satisfactory or above, or whose performance record is unknown (see note below), will be rated Acceptable for Past Performance.

UNACCEPTABLE Offerors whose past performance information demonstrates any of the element being rated as marginal or lower will be rated Unacceptable for Past Performance.

Note: In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iv)). Therefore, the offeror shall be three

D. PROPOSAL SUBMISSION

INTRODUCTION: electronically to the Contract

Specialist, Bradley Grothus, Bradley.J.Grothus@usace.army.mil, as set forth below. The

DoD SAFE Website may be utilized for larger files at https://safe.apps.mil/. The first page of the Standard Form 1442, or solicitation, provides the Government address and receipt date for proposal submittal.

The O three (3) volumes:

I Price Proposal

II Technical Proposal

III- Past Performance

Files shall not contain classified data. The use of hyperlinks in proposals is prohibited.

Work with a statement of intent to perform does not reflect an understanding of the requirement or capability to perform. Offerors are responsible for including sufficient details to permit a complete and accurate evaluation of each proposal. Proprietary information shall be clearly marked.

PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS: The proposal submission requirements are as follows:

Each volume shall be submitted as a separate PDF file. Each volume shall be clearly labeled with its title. Offeror shall sign the first two pages of SF 1442.

Typing should be single spaced. Each paragraph shall be separated by at least one (1) blank line. A standard, 12-point minimum font size applies. Arial or New Times Roman fonts are required. Tables and illustrations may use a reduced font size no less than 8-point and may be landscape.

Table D-1 illustrates the volumes of material that shall be submitted:

mailto:Bradley.J.Grothus@usace.army.mil

Table D-1: Proposal Submission Requirements

VOLUME TITLE

DIGITAL

COPIES

MAXIMUM

PAGES

I - Price Proposal 1 N/A

Signed SF1442 and Acknowledgement of Amendments

N/A

Schedule of Prices N/A

Representations, Certifications, and other

Solicitation, Offer and Award

Documents

N/A

Bid Guarantee (Bid Bonds) N/A

Joint Venture and/or Articles of

Organization for LLC, if applicable

N/A

**Small Business Subcontracting Plan-

IF A LARGE BUSINESS

N/A

II Technical Proposal 1 30

Schedule

Experience

III - Past Performance 1 20

** A Small Business Subcontracting Plan shall be prepared in accordance with FAR 52.219-

9 and is excluded from the page count.

Note: Pages that exceed the required page limitations will not be evaluated. Additional pages over the maximum allowed will be removed or not read and will not be evaluated by the

Government. Pages submitted for organization purpose to include cover sheets, title pages, and indexes do not count toward to page limitations. Past Performance Questionnaires do not count toward page limitations.

PROPOSAL FILES:

a. Format. The submission shall be clearly indexed and logically assembled. Each volume shall be clearly identified and shall begin at the top of a page. All pages of each volume shall be appropriately numbered and identified by the complete company name, date and

RFP number in the header and/or footer. A Table of Contents should be created using the

Table of Content feature in MS Word. MS Word (doc) files shall use the following page setup parameters:

Margins Top, Bottom, Left, Right

Gutter

From Edge

Page Size, Width

Page Size, Height

NOTE: 11x17 pages are acceptable for tables/graphic representations; however, each

11x17 page counts as two (2) pages.

b. File Packaging. Files shall be in read-only format, using PDF files. If disc are submitted, each disc shall be externally labeled with the volume number, date, and the O

**Note Self extracting exe. files are not acceptable.

CONTENT ORGANIZATION:

All information shall be confined to the appropriate file. The Offeror shall confine submissions to essential matters, sufficient to define the proposal in a concise manner, to permit a complete and accurate evaluation of each proposal. Proprietary information shall be clearly marked. Each volume of the proposal shall consist of a Table of Contents, along with the detailed information provided below:

VOLUME I Price Proposal: The volume shall consist of all information required to support the offered price. Certified cost and pricing data are not currently required; however, the

Government reserves the right to request such data prior to award. No pricing information shall be contained in any other volume of this proposal. There are no page limits for this volume.

Other than U.S. Small Business Offerors must submit a subcontracting plan meeting the requirements of FAR 52.219-9 and DFARS 252.219-7003 (or DFARS 252.219-7004 if the

Offeror has a comprehensive subcontracting plan) to be eligible for award. The

Subcontracting Plan is NOT rated

VOLUME II Technical Proposal: The volume shall consist of all information required to support the technical requirements and shall not exceed fifty (50) pages. No technical information shall be contained in any other volume. The volume shall be organized into the following sections:

Subfactor 1: Schedule

Subfactor 2: Experience

VOLUME III Past Performance Proposal:This volume shall contain past performance information and shall not exceed 20 pages.

Past Performance Questionnaires do not count toward the page limitation.

No past performance information should be contained in any other volume of this proposal.

Past Performance Questionnaire:

The Offeror shall submit up to five (5) Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) Forms which identify if the contract is active or complete; if the contract was for the Government (Federal, state, local, etc.) or commercial; and if the Offeror was the prime contractor, a teaming partner, and/or joint venture. If more than five (5) are submitted, only the five (5) most recent projects will be considered. The PPQ respondent must have been a client, or client representative, with whom the Offeror/subcontractor had a contract, or subcontract (if applicable) for one or more projects. Contracts shall be at least six (6) months old to be considered. Contracts with expiration dates prior to 2010 shall not be considered. Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires.

In addition to the above, the Government may review any other sources of information for evaluating past performance. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the Government-wide Past Performance

Information Application using all CAGE/DUNS numbers of team members (partnership, joint venture, teaming arrangement, or parent company/subsidiary/affiliate) identified in the

System (eSRS), and any other known sources not provided by the Offeror. While the

Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the Offeror.

E. DISCUSSIONS

GENERAL INFORMATION:

In accordance with FAR 15.306(d), discussion sessions with each Offeror may be held.

Should discussions take place, all Offerors in the competitive range will be allowed a minimum of seven (7) calendar days to submit Final Proposal Revisions. However, award may be made without discussions.

DISCUSSION SCHEDULING:

If discussions are conducted, the Contracting Officer will schedule the discussion sessions, and each Offeror will be notified of the time and place at least three (3) business days prior to their discussion session. Appropriate security clearances should be provided by the Offerors in sufficient time to process the requests. The Contracting Officer will provide additional instructions with the notification. The discussion sessions will take place by the method of the Gov

APPENDIX D

Enclosure 1

USACE Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ)

CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)

1. Contractor Information

Firm Name: CAGE Code:

Address: DUNs Number:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:

2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture

Other (Explain)

Percent of project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):

3. Contract Information

Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement

Other (Please specify):

Contract Title:

Contract Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Contract Completion Date

(mm/dd/yy):

Actual Completion Date

(mm/dd/yy):

Explain Differences:

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):

Explain Differences:

4. Project Description:

Complexity of Work: High Med Routine

How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)

CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)

5. Client Information

Name:

Title:

Phone

Number:

Email

Address:

6. Describe the client s role in the project:

7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):

8. Client s Signature:

NOTE: USACE requests that the client completes this questionnaire and submits directly back to the Offeror.

The Offeror will submit the completed questionnaire to USACE with their proposal, and may duplicate this questionnaire for future submission on USACE solicitations. Clients are highly encouraged to submit questionnaires directly to the Offeror. However, questionnaires may be submitted directly to USACE. Please contact the Offeror for USACE POC information. The

Government reserves the right to verify any and all information on this form.

USACE Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ)

TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT

ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT YOUR

EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR S PERFORMANCE

Form PPQ -0

RATING DEFINITION NOTE

(E) Exceptional Performance met contractual requirements and exceeded many to the Government/Owner s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.

An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the

Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

(VG) Very Good Performance met contractual requirements and exceeded some to the Government s/Owner s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the

Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.

(S) Satisfactory Performance met minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.

Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.

(M) Marginal Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflected a serious problem for which the contractor did not perform satisfactory corrective actions. The contractor's corrective actions were only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the

Government/Owner.

(U)

Unsatisfactory

Performance did not meet most contractual requirements and recovery was not made in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contained serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions, if any, were ineffective.

An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.

(N) Not

Applicable

No information or did not apply to your contract Rating will be neither positive nor negative.

PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING

WHICH BEST REFLECTS YOUR EVALUATION

OF THE CONTRACTO S PERFORMANCE.

1. QUALITY:

a) Quality of technical work completed E VG S M U N

b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance

E VG S M U N

c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance

E VG S M U N

d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements

(without adverse effect on performance)

E VG S M U N

2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below)

E VG S M U N

b) Rate the contractor s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract

E VG S M U N

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project? E VG S M U N

b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes)

E VG S M U N

c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer?

E VG S M U N

d) Overall customer satisfaction E VG S M U N

4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR

a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force?

E VG S M U N

b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort

E VG S M U N

c) Government Property Control (if applicable) E VG S M U N

d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel E VG S M U N

e) Utilization of Small Business concerns E VG S M U N

f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple disciplines within the project

E VG S M U N

g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to requested changes

E VG S M U N

h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)

E VG S M U N

5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)?

E VG S M U N

b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client

E VG S M U N

c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the

Contractor timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances

(under runs or overruns)

E VG S M U N

d) Is the Contractor s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in

Remarks section.

Yes

No

e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.

f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below.

6. SAFETY/SECURITY

a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues? (Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.)

E VG S M U N

b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements.

E VG S M U N

7. GENERAL

a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting

Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues).

E VG S M U N

b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues)

E VG S M U N

c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below)

Yes No

d) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor.

E VG S M U N

Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks. Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk

(please attach additional pages if necessary)

52.252-1 SOLICITATION PROVISIONS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE (FEB 1998)

This solicitation incorporates one or more solicitation provisions by reference, with the same force and effect as if they were given in full text. Upon request, the Contracting Officer will make their full text available. The offeror is cautioned that the listed provisions may include blocks that must be completed by the offeror and submitted with its quotation or offer. In lieu of submitting the full text of those provisions, the offeror may identify the provision by paragraph identifier and provide the appropriate information with its quotation or offer. Also, the full text of a solicitation provision may be accessed electronically at this address:

www.acquisition.gov

(End of provision) http://www.acquisition.gov/

The following have been deleted:

5152.211-9000 EVALUATION OF SUBLINE ITEMS (DEC 2019) APR 2020

SECTION 00700 - CONTRACT CLAUSES

The following have been added by full text:

52.217-5 EVALUATION OF OPTIONS (JUL 1990)

Except when it is determined in accordance with FAR 17.206(b) not to be in the Government's best interests, the

Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. Evaluation of options will not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

52.217-7 OPTION FOR INCREASED QUANTITY--SEPARATELY PRICED LINE ITEM (MAR 1989)

The Government may require the delivery of the numbered line item, identified in the Schedule as an option item, in the quantity and at the price stated in the Schedule. The Contracting Officer may exercise the option by written notice to the Contractor by 01 November 2022. Delivery of added items shall continue at the same rate that like items are called for under the contract, unless the parties otherwise agree.

(End of clause)

252.219-7003 SMALL BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTING PLAN (DOD CONTRACTS) (DEC 2019)

This clause supplements the Federal Acquisition Regulation 52.219-9, Small Business Subcontracting Plan, clause of this contract.

(a) Definition. As used in this clause--

Summary Subcontract Report (SSR) Coordinator means the individual who is registered in the Electronic

Subcontracting Reporting System (eSRS) at the Department of Defense level and is responsible for acknowledging receipt or rejecting SSRs submitted under an individual subcontracting plan in eSRS for the Department of Defense.

(b) Subcontracts awarded to qualified nonprofit agencies designated by the Committee for Purchase From People

Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled (41 U.S.C. 8502-8504), may be counted toward the Contractor's small business subcontracting goal (section 8025 of Pub. L. 108-87)

(c) A mentor firm, under the Pilot Mentor-Protege Program established under section 831 of Public Law 101-510, as amended, may count toward its small disadvantaged business goal, subcontracts awarded to--

(1) Protege firms which are qualified organizations employing the severely disabled; and

(2) Former protege firms that meet the criteria in section 831(g)(4) of Public Law 101-510.

(d) The master plan is approved by the cognizant contract administration activity for the Contractor.

(e) In those subcontracting plans which specifically identify small businesses, the Contractor shall notify the

Administrative Contracting Officer of any substitutions of firms that are not small business firms, for the small business firms specifically identified in the subcontracting plan. Notifications shall be in writing and shall occur within a reasonable period of time after award of the subcontract. Contractor-specified formats shall be acceptable.

(f)(1) For DoD, the Contractor shall submit reports in eSRS as follows:

(i) The Individual Subcontract Report (ISR) shall be submitted to the contracting officer at the procuring contracting office, even when contract administration has been delegated to the Defense Contract Management Agency.

(ii) Submit the consolidated SSR for an individual subcontracting plan to the “Department of Defense.”

(2) For DoD, the authority to acknowledge receipt or reject reports in eSRS is as follows:

(i) The authority to acknowledge receipt or reject the ISR resides with the contracting officer who receives it, as described in paragraph (f)(1)(i) of this clause.

(ii) The authority to acknowledge receipt of or reject SSRs submitted under an individual subcontracting plan resides with the SSR Coordinator.

(g) Include the clause at Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) 252.219-7004, Small

Business Subcontracting Plan (Test Program), in subcontracts with subcontractors that participate in the Test

Program described in DFARS 219.702-70, if the subcontract is expected to exceed the applicable threshold specified in Federal Acquisition Regulation 19.702(a), and to have further subcontracting opportunities.

52.211-10 COMMENCEMENT, PROSECUTION, AND COMPLETION OF WORK (APR 1984)

The Contractor shall be required to (a) commence work under this contract within 15 calendar days after the date the

Contractor receives the notice to proceed, (b) prosecute the work diligently, and (c) complete the entire work ready for use not later than 01 May 2023. The time stated for completion shall include final cleanup of the premises.

See Section 01 14 00 for additional requirements.

52.228-1 BID GUARANTEE (SEP 1996)

(a) Failure to furnish a bid guarantee in the proper form and amount, by the time set for opening of bids, may be cause for rejection of the bid.

(b) The bidder shall furnish a bid guarantee in the form of a firm commitment, e.g., bid bond supported by good and sufficient surety or sureties acceptable to the Government, postal money order, certified check, cashier's check, irrevocable letter of credit, or, under Treasury Department regulations, certain bonds or notes of the United States.

The Contracting Officer will return bid guarantees, other than bid bonds, (1) to unsuccessful bidders as soon as practicable after the opening of bids, and (2) to the successful bidder upon execution of contractual documents and bonds (including any necessary coinsurance or reinsurance agreements), as required by the bid as accepted.-

(c) The amount of the bid guarantee shall be 20 percent of the bid price or $3,000,000.00, whichever is less.-

(d) If the successful bidder, upon acceptance of its bid by the Government within the period specified for acceptance, fails to execute all contractual documents or furnish executed bond(s) within 10 days after receipt of the forms by the bidder, the Contracting Officer may terminate the contract for default.-

(e) In the event the contract is terminated for default, the bidder is liable for any cost of acquiring the work that exceeds the amount of its bid, and the bid guarantee is available to offset the difference.

The following have been deleted:

5152.211-9001 VARIATIONS IN ESTIMATED QUANTITIES —

SUBLINE ITEMS (DEC 2019)

APR 2020

SECTION 00800 - SPECIAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS

WAGE RATES

"General Decision Number: IL20220015 07/01/2022

Superseded General Decision Number: IL20210015

State: Illinois

Construction Types: Heavy and Highway

Counties: Adams, Brown, Cass, Champaign, Christian, Clark, Coles, Cumberland, De Witt, Douglas, Edgar, Logan, Macon, Mason, Menard, Morgan, Moultrie, Piatt, Pike, Sangamon, Schuyler, Scott, Shelby and Vermilion Counties in Illinois.

DE WITT COUNTY:

HEAVY CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS (including Sewer & Water Line

Construction & Drainage Projects) & HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION

PROJECTS (excluding tunnels, building structures in rest area projects, and railroad construction; bascule, suspension & spandrel arch bridges; bridges designed for commercial navigation; bridges involving marine construction, other major bridges).

Note: Contracts subject to the Davis-Bacon Act are generally required to pay at least the applicable minimum wage rate required under Executive Order 14026 or Executive Order 13658.

Please note that these Executive Orders apply to covered contracts entered into by the federal government that are subject to the Davis-Bacon Act itself, but do not apply to contracts subject only to the Davis-Bacon Related Acts, including those set forth at 29 CFR 5.1(a)(2)-(60).

|If the contract is entered |. Executive Order 14026 |

|into on or after January 30, | generally applies to the |

|2022, or the contract is | contract. |

|renewed or extended (e.g., an |. The contractor must pay |

|option is exercised) on or | all covered workers at |

|after January 30, 2022: | least $15.00 per hour (or |

| | the applicable wage rate |

| | listed on this wage |

| | determination, if it is |

| | higher) for all hours |

| | spent performing on the |

| | contract in 2022. |

|If the contract was awarded on|. Executive Order 13658 |

|or between January 1, 2015 and| generally applies to the |

|January 29, 2022, and the | contract. |

|contract is not renewed or |. The contractor must pay all|

|extended on or after January | covered workers at least |

|30, 2022: | $11.25 per hour (or the |

| | applicable wage rate listed|

| | on this wage determination,|

| | if it is higher) for all |

| | hours spent performing on |

| | that contract in 2022. |

The applicable Executive Order minimum wage rate will be adjusted annually. If this contract is covered by one of the

Executive Orders and a classification considered necessary for performance of work on the contract does not appear on this wage determination, the contractor must still submit a conformance request.

Additional information on contractor requirements and worker protections under the Executive Orders is available at https://www.dol.gov/agencies/whd/government-contracts.

Modification Number Publication Date

0 01/07/2022

1 01/14/2022

2 02/25/2022

3 03/11/2022

4 04/08/2022

5 04/22/2022

6 05/06/2022

7 05/13/2022

8 06/03/2022

9 06/10/2022

10 06/17/2022

11 07/01/2022

BRIL0008-011 05/01/2020

LOGAN, MORGAN and SCOTT COUNTIES

Rates Fringes

CEMENT MASON/CONCRETE FINISHER...$ 31.91 21.93

CARP0237-012 05/15/2020

MASON COUNTY

CARPENTER........................$ 33.55 30.07

PILEDRIVERMAN....................$ 33.55 30.07

CARP0237-021 05/01/2021

DE WITT COUNTY

CARPENTER........................$ 37.06 31.16

PILEDRIVERMAN....................$ 37.06 31.16

CARP0243-001 05/15/2020

CHAMPAIGN, EDGAR, AND VERMILION COUNTIES

CARPENTER........................$ 37.85 25.77

PILEDRIVERMAN....................$ 37.85 25.77

CARP0243-006 05/15/2020

COLES, CUMBERLAND, MOULTRIE, and SHELBY COUNTIES

CARPENTER........................$ 35.65 27.97

PILEDRIVERMAN....................$ 35.65 27.97

CARP0243-009 05/15/2020

DOUGLAS COUNTY

CARPENTER........................$ 35.65 27.97

PILEDRIVERMAN....................$ 35.65 27.97

CARP0243-014 05/01/2017

CLARK COUNTY

CARPENTER........................$ 36.20 21.92

PILEDRIVERMAN....................$ 37.20 21.92

CARP0270-004 05/01/2017

CHRISTIAN, MENARD, AND SANGAMON (Except Illiopolis) COUNTIES

CARPENTER........................$ 32.15 25.97

PILEDRIVERMAN....................$ 33.15 25.97

CARP0270-007 05/01/2017

ADAMS COUNTY

CARPENTER........................$ 31.55 25.97

PILEDRIVERMAN....................$ 32.55 25.97

CARP0270-016 05/15/2020

MACON, MOULTRIE (North of Rt #133), PIATT (Southwestern Half), SANGAMON (Illiopolis) AND SHELBY (Moweaqua & North thereof)

COUNTIES

CARPENTER........................$ 35.05 28.57

PILEDRIVERMAN....................$ 35.05 28.57

CARP0270-021 05/15/2020

LOGAN COUNTY

CARP0270-024 05/15/2020

BROWN, CASS, MORGAN, PIKE, AND SCOTT COUNTIES

CARP0270-026 05/01/2017

SCHUYLER COUNTY

CARPENTER........................$ 32.15 25.97

ELEC0034-012 03/01/2019

MASON (Except Bath, Crane Creek, Kilbourne, Lynchburg, Mason

City, & Salt Creek TWPS) COUNTY

ELECTRICIAN......................$ 37.51 21.67

ELEC0034-015 03/01/2019

ELECTRICIAN......................$ 31.00 18.40

ELEC0051-003 03/07/2022

ADAMS, BROWN, CASS, CHAMPAIGN, CHRISTIAN, DEWITT, DOUGLAS,

EDGAR, LOGAN, MACON, MASON, MENARD, PIATT, SCHUYLER, SCOTT,

VERMILION, COLES (East Oakland, Humboldt, Morgan, North Okaw, and Seven Hickory TWPS), MORGAN, MOULTRIE (Except Whitley TWP), PIKE, SANGAMON, & SHELBY (that portion West of Holland, Prairie, Richland, and Windsor TWPS) COUNTIES

Line Construction

Groundman/Equipment

Operator (All crawler type equipment larger than D-4, 15 ton crane or larger).....$ 50.97 32.5%+7.00

Groundman/Truck Driver......$ 38.66 32.5%+7.00

Lineman and Substation

Technician..................$ 56.74 32.5%+7.00

ELEC0146-003 06/01/2022

CHRISTIAN, COLES, CUMBERLAND, DE WITT (Harp, Wapella, Barnett, Clintonia, De Witt, Turnbridge, Texas, Creek & Nixon TWPS), DOUGLAS (Arcola, Burbon, Garrett TWPS & the portion of Tuscola lying West of the City of Tuscola & Illinois Central Railroad tracks), MACON, MOULTRIE, PIATT (Goose Creek, Willow Branch, Cerro Gordo, Bement & Unity TWPS), AND SHELBY COUNTIES

ELECTRICIAN......................$ 41.00 20.68

ELEC0193-004 06/01/2022

ELECTRICIAN

CASS, LOGAN, MASON (Bath, Crane Creek, Kilbourne, Lynchburg, Mason City &

Salt Creek TWPS), MENARD, MORGAN, SANGAMON and SCOTT

COUNTIES....................$ 39.36 5%+18.95

ELEC0193-010 04/04/2022

CASS, LOGAN, MASON (Townships of Lynchburg, Bath, Kilbourne, Crane Creek, Salt Creek, and Mason), MENARD, MORGAN, SCOTT, AND

SANGAMON COUNTIES

Groundman - Equipment

Operator (Class I, all crawler type equipment larger than D-4, 15 ton crane or larger)............$ 52.50 29.5%+7.00

Groundman - Truck Driver

(with winch, may operate diggers, 5th wheel type trucks, crawler-type equipment, D-4 and smaller, backhoe 3/4 yard and under, rubber tire and crawler w/end loader, and may drive bucket truck and live boom type line trucks).$ 39.81 29.5%+7.00

Groundman - Truck Driver

(without winch).............$ 37.49 29.5%+7.00

Groundman (Class A).........$ 35.66 29.5%+7.00

Lineman & Substation Tech...$ 58.44 29.5%+7.00

ELEC0197-003 12/01/2021

Electricians:....................$ 41.25 21.30

ELEC0538-008 06/01/2022

VERMILION COUNTY

ELECTRICIAN......................$ 37.80 22.66

ELEC0702-002 01/01/2022

ALEXANDER, CLAY, CRAWFORD, EDWARDS, EFFINGHAM, FRANKLIN,

FAYETTE (Excludes portion North Avena), GALLATIN, HAMILTON, HARDIN, JACKSON, JASPER, JEFFERSON, JOHNSON, LAWRENCE, MARION, MASSAC, PERRY, POPE, PULASKI, RANDOLPH (Except Red Bud Twps), RICHLAND, SALINE, UNION, WABASH, WAYNE, WHITE, AND WILLIAMSON

COUNTIES;

CLARK, COLES (Southern Half), CUMBERLAND, MOULTRIE (Whitley

TWP), and SHELBY (Except West of Holland, Prairie, Richland, &

Windsor TWPS) COUNTIES;

BOND (Eastern Half), and WASHINGTON (OKAWVILLE & VENDY TWPS)

Groundman - Class A.........$ 34.43 29%+8.35

Groundman - Equipment

Operator Class II (all other equipment)............$ 41.93 29%+8.35

Heavy - Equipment Operator

Class I (all crawler type equipment D-4 and larger)...$ 47.02 29%+8.35

Lineman.....................$ 59.09 29%+8.35

ENGI0649-006 04/01/2022

OPERATOR: Power Equipment

Group 1.....................$ 43.96 38.05+A

Group 2.....................$ 40.65 38.05+A

Group 3.....................$ 35.19 38.05+A

POWER EQUIPMENT OPERATOR CLASSIFICATIONS

GROUP 1: Cranes: Overhead Cranes; Hydro Crane; Shovels;

Crane type Backfiller; Tower Cranes-Mobile, Crawler, Stationary; Derricks, Hoist (3 drum); Draglines; Drott

Yumbo & similar types considered as Cranes; 360 Degrees

Swing Excavator, Backhoe; Derrick Boats; Pile Driver and

Skid Rigs; Clam Shell; Locomotive Cranes; Road Pavers

(Single Drum, Dual Drum, Tri Batcher); Motor Patrol & Power

Blades (Dunmore, Elevating & similar types); Mechanics;

Central Concrete Mixing Plant Operator; Asphalt Batch Plant

Operator and Plant Engineer; Gradall; Caisson Rigs; Skimmer

Scoop, Koehring Scooper; Dredges (all types); Hoptoe; All

Cherry Pickers; Work Boat; Ross Carrier; Helicopter; Dozer;

Tournadozer; Tournapulls (all & similar types); Concrete and all recycle machines, Multiple Unit Earth Movers; 75 cents per hour for each scoop over one; Scoops (all sizes);

Pushcats; Endloaders (all types); Asphalt Surfacing

Machine; Slip Form Paver; Rock Crusher; Material Crusher

(outside pits and quarries); Screening Plants (outside pits and quarries); Tunnel Boring Machine; Heavy Equipment

Greaser (Top Greaser on Spread); CMI, Auto Grade, CMI Belt

Placer (3 track & similar types); Side Booms; Starting

Engineer on Pipeline or Construction (eleven 11 pieces or more); Asphalt Heater & Planer Combination; Wheel Tractors with Dozer, Hoe or End Loader attachements; CAT Earthwork

Compactors and similar types; Blaw Knox Spreader & similar types; Trench Machines; Pump Crete, Belt Crete, Squeeze

Crete, Screw Type Pumps & Gypsum; Creter Crane; Concrete

Pump Truck; Formless Finishing Machines; Flaherty Spreader or similar types; Screedman on Laydown Machine; Vermeer

Concrete Saw; Laser Screed; Span Saw; Dredge Leverman;

Dredge Engineer; Lull or similar type; Hydro-Boom Truck;

Guard Rail Machine.

GROUP 2: Bulker & Pump; Power Launches; Boring Machine &

Pipe Jacking Machine; Dinkeys; Carts, powered haul unit for a boring machine; P-H one Pass Soil Cement Machines and similar types: Wheel Tractor; Back Fillers; Euclid Loader;

Fork LIfts; Jeep with Ditching Machines or other attachments; Tuneluger; Automatic Cement & Gravel Batching

Plants; Mobile Drills Soil Testing and similar types);

Pugmill with Pump; All 1 and 2 Drum Hoists; De-watering

Systems; Straw Blower; Hydro Seeder; Bump Grinders, Self

Propelled; Assistant Heavy Equipment Greaser; Apsco

Spreader Tractors (Track-Type w/o Power Units pulling

Rollers); Rollers on Asphalt, Brick, or Macadam; Concrete

Breakers; Concrete Spreaders; Cement Strippers; Cement

Finishing Machines & CMI Texture & Reel Curing Machines;

Vibro-Tampers & similar types self-propelled; Mechanical

Bull-Floats; Self-Propelled Concrete Saw; Truck Mounted

Power Saws; Curb Cutters; Mixers over 3 bags to 27E; Winch

& Boom Trucks; Tractor pulling Power Blade or Elevating

Grader; Porter Rex Rail; Clary Screed; Mule pulling

Rollers; Pugmill w/o Pump; Barber Greene or similar

Loaders; Track Type Tractor with power unit attached;

Fireman; Spray Machine on paving; Curb Machine; Paved Ditch

Machine; Power Broom; Self-Propelled Sweepers; Self-

Propelled Conveyors; Power Subgrader; Oil Distributor;

Straight Tractor; Truck Crane Oiler; Truck Type Oilers;

Directional Boring Machine; Horizontal Directional Drill;

Articulating End Dump Vehicles; Starting Engineer (6 to 10 pieces).

GROUP 3: Straight Framed Truck and Truck Mounted Vac Unit, Starting Engineer (3 to 5 pieces); Trac Air Machine w/o attachments; Rollers, 5 tons & under on earth & gravel;

Form Grader; Bulk Cement Plant; Oilers.

- Escalated Rate on Crane, Derrick Booms, and Tower Cranes:

Additional $1.00 per hour over scale when Crane or Derrick is positioned 50 ft. or more above adjacent ground level or water level. $.05 per hour, per foot, over 90 feet including jib. $0.02 per hour, per ton - over 50-ton capacity.

- Operating engineers who operate Lattice Boom Crawler

Cranes, Lattice Boom Truck Cranes, Telescopic Boom Cranes less than 17.5 Tons, Tower Cranes, Overhead Cranes and have been Certified by hte National Commission for the

Certification of Crane Operators on the equipment they operate shall receive $1.60 per hour over scale.

A. On designated Hazardous Waste jobs, operators shall receive:

Level A add $4.00 to the appropriate group rate; Levels B…