B.08.03 Solicitation Amendment W912EF26RA0040001 SF 30.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

J

PAGE OF PAGES

1 22

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

15 DEC 2025

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

NA

6. ISSUED BY CODE W912EF 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

US ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT WALLA WAL

KO CONTRACTING DIVISION, 201 NORTH 3RD AVE

WALLA WALLA, WA 99362-1876

UNITED STATES

CHANDRA CROW, EMAIL: CHANDRA.D.CROW@USAC

527-7202

E.ARMY.MIL TELEPHONE: 509-

SCD: PAS:

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X ) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

W912EF26RA004

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

20 NOV 2025

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE

11. THIS IT

FACILITY CODE

EM ONLY APPLIES TO A

MENDMENTS OF

S

OLIC

ITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE

RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER.

If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

SEE SECTION G - CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION DATA

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

The purpose for this amendment is to clarify the project submission requirements for offerors. The updated language specifies a maximum of eight (8) total projects for the prime contractor and all major subcontractors combined. It also defines that projects must have been awarded within the past seven (7) years or are currently in performance and clarifies that both Government and commercial contracts are acceptable. All changes are indicated in red text.

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

CYNTHIA H. JACOBSEN

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

15 DEC 2025

Previous edition unusable STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016) Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

W912EF26RA0040001

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

Section 00 10 00 - Solicitation, Contract Line Item Number

(CLIN) Schedule

The following CLIN(s) / SLIN(s) / ELIN(s) were modified:

INFORMATION FROM TO CHANGED BY

North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) 238290

Option Line Item 0002

INFORMATION FROM TO CHANGED BY

North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) 238290

Option Line Item 0003

INFORMATION FROM TO CHANGED BY

North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) 238290

Section 00 21 00 - Instructions

Miscellaneous text in this section has been modified to:

NOTICE: PROJECT LABOR AGREEMENT (PLA)

This statement clarifies the applicability of Project Labor Agreements (PLAs) to the Crane Multiple Award Task Order Contract (MATOC). While the overarching MATOC does not require a PLA, PLAs may be required at the Task Order level, consistent with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) guidance.

Specifically, FAR 22.503(d) outlines agency procedures for utilizing PLAs under an IDIQ. These regulations allow contracting officers to either require or not require a PLA on individual Task Orders based on a project-specific data, considering factors such as project size, potential cost, complexity, and risk for labor disputes.

Therefore, offerors should be aware that individual Task Orders issued under this MATOC may require adherence to a PLA. The Request for Proposal (RFP) for each Task Order will explicitly state whether a PLA is required, and if so, will provide the specific PLA document to be followed. The Contracting Officer anticipates limited use of PLAs under this IDIQ, and their application will be carefully evaluated on each Task Order in accordance with FAR and DFARS regulations.

ATTENTION TO OFFERORS

Offeror(s) may be asked to provide the following information for the Government's use in the determination of offeror(s) responsibility, pursuant to FAR Part 9. Do not include it with your offer.

1. Current Balance Sheet and latest Profit and Loss Statement prepared from the most recent fiscal

/calendar year and certified by an officer of the company.

2. The name of your banking institution, telephone number and the name of the individual to contact for a line-of-credit reference. (If you are notified of being in the competitive range, please contact your bank reference to let him/her know our office will be calling for financial information.)

Email Address Contact Telephone Number Bank Institution

3. Tax Identification Number

4. List of present work to include agency or firm name, address, telephone number, and email address of primary point of contact responsible for inspection and acceptance of the work. (Attach list) Will performance of the present work inhibit your ability to perform this contract?

5. Offeror's email address:

Return completed form with all attachments to:

Email: chandra.d.crow@usace.army.mil

OR

Physical/Mailing Address: Walla Walla District Corps of Engineers, 201 N. 3rd Ave, Walla Walla, WA 99362-1876.

REQUIRED LIABILITY INSURANCE PURSUANT TO FAR 28.306

In accordance with the clause 52.228-5 Insurance - Work on a Government Installation, the Contractor shall procure and maintain during the entire period of his performance under this contract the following minimum insurance:

(i) Coverage complying with state laws governing insurance requirements pertaining to Workmen's Compensation and Employers" Liability Insurance.

(ii) Bodily injury liability insurance with minimum limits of $500,000 per occurrence shall be required on the comprehensive form of policy.

(iii) Automobile bodily injury and property damage liability with minimum limits of $200,000 per person and $500,000 per occurrence for bodily injury liability; and $20,000 per occurrence for property damage liability shall be required.

(iv) The coverage required under Longshore and Harbor Workers Compensation Act, if applicable.

(v) The Insurance Certificate will name the Walla Walla District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 201 N. Third Avenue, Walla Walla, Washington 99362 as the Certificate Holder.

CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBILITY, PREAWARD SURVEY

In order to determine a contractor's responsibility for purposes of contract award the contractor is required to provide a statement regarding previous experience and past performance in performing comparable work, information related to the business organization, financial resources, and/or plant to be used in performing the work. (See the Attention to Offerors form included in this solicitation.) In accordance with FAR 9.104-1, to be determined responsible, a prospective contractor must -mailto:chandra.d.crow@usace.army.mil

(a) Have adequate financial resources to perform the contract, or the ability to obtain them;

(b) Be able to comply with the required or proposed delivery or performance schedule, taking into consideration all existing commercial and governmental business commitments;

(c) Have a satisfactory performance record. (A prospective contractor shall not be determined responsible or Non responsible solely on the basis of a lack of relevant performance history except as provided in FAR 9.104-2);

(d) Have a satisfactory record of integrity and business ethics;

(e) Have the necessary organization, experience, accounting and operational controls, and technical skills, or the ability to obtain them;

(f) Have the necessary production, construction, and technical equipment and facilities, or the ability to obtain them; and

(g) Be otherwise qualified and eligible to receive an award under applicable laws and regulations.

BIDDER INQUIRY:

Bidder/Offeror Solicitation Questions:

All inquiries regarding this solicitation are to be submitted via Bidder Inquiry. Telephone and email inquiries will not be accepted. Bidder Inquiry is a web-site that allows bidders to post questions regarding the solicitation and view all questions by other bidders and responses by USACE. Bidder Inquiry can be accessed through ProjNet at (https://www.projnet.org)

Offerors are encouraged to submit bidder inquiries promptly. The Government will make every effort to answer all inquiries; however, the closer to the proposal due date an inquiry is received, the less likely it is that a timely response can be provided.

To submit and review inquiry items, prospective vendors will need to use the Bidder Inquiry Key presented below and follow the instructions listed below the key for access. A prospective vendor who submits a comment /question will receive an acknowledgement of their comment/question via email.

Another email to the same address will notify the prospective vendor once the reply is available for viewing.

The Bidder Inquiry Key is: TSGA66-EYN4HI

Specific Instructions for ProjNet Bid Inquiry Access:

1. From the ProjNet home page linked above, click on Quick Add on the upper right side of the screen.

2. Identify the Agency. This should be marked as USACE.

3. Key. Enter the Bidder Inquiry Key listed above.

4. Email. Enter the email address you would like to use for communication.

5. Click Continue. A page will then open saying that a user account was not found and will ask you to create one using the provided form.

6. Enter your First Name, Last Name, Company, City, State, Phone, Email, Secret Question, Secret Answer, and Time Zone. Make sure to remember your Secret Question and Answer as they will be used from this point on to access the ProjNet system.

7. Click Add User. Once this is completed you are now registered within ProjNet and are currently logged into the system.

Instructions for Entering Questions:

1. After you are logged in click on the "post new inquiry", it is on the left side of the window under the Word "Submit" a.) This is the window where you will enter your questions b.) Comment Classification: Click on the down arrow to the right of the words "Please select from below", select "Public" http://www.projnet.org/ c.) Discipline: This is where you select who this question should be directed to. Example: if the question is about an electrical drawing or specification select: "Electrical" from the pull-down list.

d.) Sheet. Enter the sheet number of the drawing you are asking about.

e.) Detail. Enter the detail name of the detail shown on the drawing that you are asking about.

f.) Specification. Enter the Specification number and paragraph number.

g.) File. Use this if you are going to attach a pdf file.

h.) Question. Enter your question here.

Specific Instructions for Future ProjNet Bid Inquiry Access:

1. For future access to ProjNet, you will not be provided any type of password. You will utilize your Secret Question and Secret Answer to log in.

2. From the ProjNet home page linked above, click on Quick Add on the upper right side of the screen.

3. Identify the Agency. This should be marked as USACE.

4. Key. Enter the Bidder Inquiry Key listed above.

5. Email. Enter the email address you used to register previously in ProjNet.

6. Click Continue. A page will then open asking you to enter the answer to your Secret Question.

7. Enter your Secret Answer and click Login. Once this is completed you are now logged into the system.

For questions about the ProjNet Bidder Inquiry, please contact the Call Center help desk toll free at 1- 800- 428-HELP, which operates from 8AM to 5PM (Central US time zone). Bidder inquiry help questions can also be emailed to the helpdesk at staff@rcesupport.com.

The following are the primary requirements/key elements from the various Division 01 specifications that will be included in each task order. Each task order will contain the complete set of specifications needed to perform the work.

1. AT-OPSEC: Task orders will contain specification SECTION 01 14 00.90 28 INTEGRATING ANTITERRORISM (AT) AND OPERATIONS SECURITY (OPSEC) or similar. Depending on factors such as escort requirements, the Contractor needing to access inside a government facility, access to government information systems or sensitive areas, classified information or material, and duration of the project will determine what training contractor personnel are required to complete and documents to submit. Contractors shall also comply with the requirements set forth in FAR52.222-54 Employment Eligibility Verification and FAR 22.18 in using the E-Verify Program to meet the contract employment eligibility requirements.

2. Project Schedule: Project schedule requirements are addressed in specification SECTION 01 32

01.00 28 PROJECT SCHEDULE or similar. Scheduling software used by the contractor must be commercially available from the software vendor for purchase with vendor software support agreements available. The software routine used to create the required sdef file must be created and supported by the software manufacturer. The Government intends to use Primavera P6. If the contractor chooses software other than Primavera P6, the contractor shall provide two software licenses and two computers for Government-use, and training for two Government employees in the use of the software. These computers are stand-alone and not connected to the Government network. Computers and licenses are returned at project completion. Project scheduler qualifications for the contractor's designated representative for preparing and updating the schedule shall be submitted to demonstrate experience scheduling projects of similar size and nature with the scheduling software. For projects that are smaller in size, scope and complexity, software such as Microsoft Project may be authorized.

3. Submittal Procedures: Submittal procedures and requirements are included in specification SECTION 01 33 00SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES or similar. Submittals requirements are specified in the technical sections in the task order. Submittals are identified by Submittal Description (SD) numbers and titles as follows:

SD-01 Preconstruction Submittals mailto:staff@rcesupport.com

SD-02 Shop Drawings SD-03 Product Data SD-04 Samples

SD-05 Design Data SD-06 Test Reports SD-07 Certificates SD-08 Manufacturer's Instructions SD-09 Manufacturer's Field Reports SD-10 Operation and Maintenance Data SD-11 Closeout Submittals

Each submittal is submitted in PDF format, unless otherwise noted, through RMS CM and via e-mail to the Contracting Officer's Representative (COR) and the transmittal mailbox designated for the particular district. Each submittal has an ENG Form 4025 completed in RMS 3.0 Contractor Mode. The majority of submittals are classified as "G" which require Government approval or an "I" (or no designation for most districts) which are information only and do not require Government approval. The standard Government review time is 30 calendar days from receipt of the submittal unless otherwise noted. Submittals are returned to the contractor with one of the notations listed on the ENG Form 4025. For Design Build task orders, there are Contractor-generated design submittals. Code "D" require the Contractor's designer of record approval, code "C' are for submittal that the Government will be reviewing, i.e. intermediate or final designs, code "R" are for deviations for the approved design that do not require contract modification, and code "A" are for deviations from the approved design that do require a contract modification.

4. Design Data (Design After Award): Design Build task orders will include specification SECTION01 33 16.00 28 DESIGN DATA (DESIGN AFTER AWARD) or similar. Some districts will have 01 33

00.36 for 60 PERCENT DESIGN REQUIRMENTS and 01 33 00.38 for 100 PERCENT DESIGN REQUIREMENTS. The specification will contain the requirements and standards for design quality control plans, Designer of Record (DOR) requirements, design submittals requirements, standards, and programs/software to use for design drawings, specifications, models, and design analysis. For specifications, utilize the Unified Facility Guide Specifications (UFGS) current at time of award and process using Specs Intact software. Drawings shall be compliant with ERDC/ITLSR-23-1 A/E/C Graphics Standard and ERDC/ITL SR-24-3 A/E/C CAD Standard and produced in Autodesk format using the latest version to produce all contract drawings.

5. Safety Requirements: Safety requirements for on-site work are addressed in specification SECTION 01 3529.10 28 GOVERNMENT SAFETY REQUIREMENTS or similar. The latest version of forms listed are available at:

https://www.publications.usace.army.mil/USACE-Publications/Engineer-Forms/

Primary requirements include, but are not limited to the following:

Accident Prevention Plan (APP): A site-specific APP is submitted in accordance with the format and requirements of EM 385-1-1 using ENG FORM 6293 Accident Prevention Plan Worksheet.

Activity Hazard Analysis (AHA): An AHA is required before beginning each activity, task or Definable Feature of Work (DFOW) involving a type of work presenting hazards not experienced in previous project operations, or where a new work crew or subcontractor is to perform the work. Use ENG FORM 6206, Activity Hazard Analysis. AHA requirements are in EM385-1-1, Chapter 2-6.

Lockout/Tagout (Loto)-Safe Clearance or Hazardous Energy Control Program (HECP) Procedures: Safe Clearance procedures are used by Project and contractor personnel to protect personnel, equipment and the environment as well as ensuring continuity of service. Any work performed by the contractor that requires taking project operated equipment out of service is done only after a formal clearance is obtained through the Government. Government HECP procedures are used on equipment/systems owned by the Government and on all points interfacing with Government owned equipment/systems. Contractor, http://www.publications.usace.army.mil/USACE-Publications/Engineer-Forms/ subcontractor, vendors, and visitors shall take the appropriate level of HECP Procedure training commensurate with their job duties. The three types are Awareness Level Training, Affected Persons and Authorized Individuals. Typically, only HECP certificates generated from the specific District, or the project are acceptable as each district has its own training requirements.

Based on the scope of work and size of crew, the contractor is required to have the appropriate number of Authorized Individuals trained to ensure that there are no delays. All contractor personnel working in areas under a Safe Clearance are trained as Affected Persons. Any non-working personnel, vendors and visitors, entering an area under Safe Clearance take Awareness Level training. Training and written tests for the modules below are completed on-line prior to commencing on-site work. Time estimates for training follow:

a. Awareness Level Training: Approximately 1 hour (non-working personnel, vendors and visitor

b. Affected Persons: Approximately 2 hours in addition to Awareness Level training

c. Authorized Individuals: Approximately 3 hours in addition to Awareness Level training and Affected Personnel Training

Training is an annual requirement and expires one year from completion date. The training website will be provided per each district's requirements.

Standard Lift Plan (SLP): A written SLP in accordance with EM 385-1-1, Chapter16-7.b, using ENG FORM 6203 is required for every lift or series of lifts (if duty cycle or routine lifts are being performed).

The SLP is developed, reviewed and accepted by all personnel involved in the lift in conjunction with the associated AHA. Signature on the AHA constitutes acceptance of the plan.

Critical Lift Plan (Crane or Load Handling Equipment): A Critical Lift Plan is required by EM 385-1-1, Chapter16-7.a, 16-7.b, 16-7.d, using ENG 6213 FORM. Critical lifts require detailed planning and additional or unusual safety precautions. Comply with load testing requirements in accordance with EM 385-1-1.

Crane Wheel and Outrigger Loading Diagram and Deck Protection for Outriggers: A submittal is required prior to using any crane on any of the Project decks at the dams. Cranes and equipment furnished conform to all applicable OSHA Requirements and EM 385-1-1.

Crane Operators/Riggers: Crane operators shall meet the requirements in EM 385-1-1, Chapter 15-3 for Riggers and Chapter 16-3 for Crane Operators. In addition, for mobile cranes with Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) rated capacities of 50,000 pounds or greater, designate crane operators qualified by a source that qualifies crane operators (i.e., union, a government agency, or an organization that tests and qualifies crane operators). Provide proof of current qualification.

SSHO And Alternate SSHO: A SSHO is required that meets the requirements of EM385-1-1 Chapter 2.

The SSHO ensures that the requirements of 29 CFR 1926.16 are met for the project. Provide a safety oversight team that includes a minimum of one (1) person at each project site to function as the SSHO.

The SSHO or an equally qualified Alternate SSHO is at the work site at all times, with the exception of temporary absences less than 24 hours, to implement and administer the contractor's safety program and government-accepted Accident Prevention Plan. The SSHO and Alternate SSHO have the required training, experience, and qualifications in accordance with EM 385-1-1 Chapter 2-3.b, and all associated sub-paragraphs including the following.

The SSHO is employed by the prime contractor and meets the following requirements:

a. A minimum of 5 years safety work on similar projects

b. 30-hour OSHA construction safety class or equivalent within the last 5 years

c. Provide documentation that shows the completion of a minimum of 8 hours of formal, on-line, or self-study safety and health related coursework each year during the last five (5) years

6. Contract Administration: The Government uses the Resident Management System (RMS) to assist in its monitoring and administration of task orders. Specifications include SECTION 0145 01.00 28 RESIDENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM CONTRACTOR MODE (RMS CM) or similar. The Government accesses the system using the Government Mode of RMS (RMS GM) and the contractor accesses the system using the Contractor Mode (RMS CM). The term RMS is used in the remainder of this section for both RMS GM and RMS CM. The joint Government-Contractor use of RMS facilitates electronic exchange of information and overall management of the contract. The contractor accesses RMS to record, maintain, input, track, and electronically share information with the Government throughout the contract period in the following areas: Administration, Finances, Quality Control, Submittal Monitoring, Scheduling, Closeout, and Import/Export of Data. RMS is a Windows-based program. RMS software, user manuals, access and installation instructions, program updates and training information are available from the RMS website (http://rmsdocumentation.com). The Government and the contractor have different access authorities to the same contract database through RMS. The common database is updated automatically each time a user finalizes an entry or change.

7. Quality Control: Quality Control shall be addressed in each task order. Specification SECTION 01 45 04.00 28 CONTRATOR QUALITY CONTROL, or similar, will be included. The contractor shall provide quality control and establish and maintain an effective quality control system in compliance with the clause entitled "INSPECTION OF CONSTRUCTION" or "INSPECTION OF SUPPLY-FIXED- PRICE" of the CONTRACT CLAUSES. The quality control system consists of plans, procedures, and organization necessary to produce an end product that complies with the contract requirements. The system covers all on-site work, be keyed to the proposed work sequence, and utilize established in-house quality control procedures to assure full compliance with all offsite work. Daily reports are required for all on-site work and for all off-site work.

The contractor Quality Control Plan shall identify personnel, procedures, control, instructions, tests, records, and forms to be used. Construction will be permitted to begin only after acceptance of the CQC Plan. The contractor is required to establish a CQC organization/staff that is led by the CQC System Manager who is responsible for overall management of the CQC. A Design Quality Manager is also required for Design Build projects. The CQC staff maintains a presence at the site at all times during progress of the work and have complete authority and responsibility to take any action necessary to ensure contract compliance. The contractor submits qualifications for the CQC System Manager that are commensurate to the size, scope and complexity of the work.

8. Environmental Considerations: Environmental Considerations shall be addressed for on-site work.

Task order specifications will include SECTION 01 57 20.00 28 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION or similar. The Contractor shall minimize environmental pollution and damage that may occur as the result of on-site operations. The environmental resources within the project boundaries and those affected outside the limits of permanent work are protected during the entire duration of any on-site work. The Contractor shall comply with all applicable environmental Federal, State, and local laws and regulations.

Any delays resulting from failure to comply with environmental laws and regulations are the contractor's responsibility.

An Environmental Protection Plan (EPP) is required to present a comprehensive overview of known or potential environmental issues to be addressed during construction activities. The plan shall include, but not limited to, the Contractor's plan for solid wastes management, handling Hazardous Waste, fugitive dust control, oil management, wastewater management, asbestos abatement, metals-based paint abatement, storm water pollution prevention, and concrete on-site wash areas.

9. Closeout submittals: Closeout Submittals are addressed in specification SECTION 01 78 00.00 28 CLOSEOUTSUBMITTALS or similar. Typical closeout submittals include, but are not limited to Final Shop Drawings, Working As-Built Drawings, As-Built Drawings and Record Drawings. Final Shop Drawings show all changes and revisions, including any field changes, made up to the time that the work http://rmsdocumentation.com/ is completed and accepted. The shop drawings are not required to comply with A/E/C CAD and Graphic Standards. The contractor furnishes a complete set of Shop Drawings, commonly using Autodesk format, for all shop drawings produced in performance of the specific task order.

Working As-Built Drawings are maintained on-site to accurately record any variations or changes made on-site. At the completion of the work, the contractor submits a copy of the Final As-Built Drawings after all As-Built conditions from the working as-built drawings have been incorporated in the CAD drawings. Submit in ADOBE .pdf format. After approval of the Final As-Built Drawings submittal, the contractor creates the CAD Record Drawings to update the Contract Drawings with the as-built conditions. The Record Drawing files are in the same drawing format as initially provided by the Government. The Government provides all original CAD files of the contract drawings, commonly in Autodesk format. Record drawings comply with ERDC/ITL SR-23-1 A/E/C Graphics Standard and ERDC/ITL SR-24-3 A/E/C CAD Standard.

10. Operation and Maintenance Data: Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Data is addressed in specification

SECTION 01 78 23.00 28 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE DATA or similar. Typical O&M submittals include, but are not limited to, providing electronic Preliminary and Draft O&M Data and Parts Manuals, and electronic and hard copy Final O&M Data and Parts Manuals, updating existing O&M manuals with new O&M data, and providing and

O&M Data Base.

BASIS FOR AWARD

The MATOC awards and Task Order 0001 will be made based on the best value to the Government by using the Best Value Trade-Off source selection process in FAR Part 15 and two-phase design-build procedures in FAR Part 36.3. The total contract dollar capacity shared among firms will not exceed $499,320,000. Any unused capacity in one period may be carried over into the subsequent contract period. The minimum guarantee amount for the entire life of the contract for each IDIQ awardee is $10,000. The minimum Task Order value is $2,500 and the maximum Task Order value is $50,000,000.

The Government intends to award up to five IDIQ contracts to the offeror(s) whose proposal, conforming to the RFP, will be most advantageous to the Government resulting in the Best Value. Task Orders may be issued either as Design Build or Design-Bid-Build projects. Task Orders will be primarily awarded on a firm-fixed price basis; however, task orders may be awarded on a Time and Materials (T&M) or Labor Hour basis, if necessary, to address unusual circumstances.

The Government will initially evaluate offerors' proposals submitted in response to Phase One of this solicitation. After evaluation of Phase One, the Government will select at least five of the most highly qualified firms to submit Phase Two proposals. Upon the conclusion of Phase One, the solicitation will be amended to include the Phase Two evaluation factors including price and the scope of work for the first Task Order 0001 that will be awarded along with the MATOC IDIQ contracts. Phase One submissions and evaluations will not be carried over into Phase Two. All offerors selected to propose for Phase Two will be evaluated only on the Evaluation Factors outlined in the Phase Two RFP. PHASE

ONE DOES NOT INVOLVE ANY SUBMISSION OF PRICING INFORMATION.

Phase One evaluation factors are as follows:

FACTOR 1: QUALIFICATIONS & CERTIFICATIONS

FACTOR 2: TECHNICAL APPROACH

FACTOR 3: PAST PERFORMANCE

Phase Two of the solicitation will include the informational plans (floor plan, cross section, and elevation), Statement of Work, and the specifications for Task Order 0001. The estimated construction magnitude for Task Order 0001 is between $10,000,000 and $25,000,000. A pre-proposal conference/site visit may be conducted during Phase Two. Phase Two offerors will have a minimum of 60 days to submit their proposals.

Phase Two evaluation factors are as follows:

FACTOR 4: WORK PLAN

FACTOR 5: SMALL BUSINESS PARTICIPATION

FACTOR 6: PRICE

During Phase Two, the government will provide submission requirements and specific information pertaining to the Phase Two evaluation factors which will be based on the requirements for Task Order 0001. Additionally, the relative importance of the Phase Two factors both to each other and to price will be identified in the Phase Two solicitation. All offerors selected as most highly qualified and invited to Phase Two source selection will be required to submit a proposal for all Phase Two evaluation factors to be considered both for the seed project and to be a MATOC holder. Further, any deficiency in the Phase Two source selection will render the proposal un-awardable both for the seed project and the overall

MATOC.

The Government may award the MATOC contracts and Task Order 0001 on the basis of initial offers received in Phase Two, without discussions; therefore, an offeror's proposal should contain the offeror's best terms from a technical Work Plan, Small Business Participation, and price standpoint. The price proposal will not be assigned a rating for evaluation. The Government reserves the right to award to other than the lowest prices offered. Awards will be made based on the proposals found to be the most advantageous to the Government considering Evaluation Factors 4 through 6 (Work Plan, Small Business Participation, and Price).

The Government will evaluate offerors' proposals based on how well the proposals address each of the Evaluation Factors provided below for Phase One and the Evaluation Factors that will be provided in more detail for Phase Two. The evaluation process includes an assessment of the offerors' strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, risks, and uncertainties in addressing the Government's requirements as specified in the Request for Proposal (RFP).

SCOPE OF WORK

Task Orders will primarily be for providing new cranes, hoists, and lifting devices, which may be a replacement of various types of cranes, hoists and lifting devices at locks and dams. Project locations are within the states of Colorado, Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Oregon, South Dakota, Washington, and Wyoming. The equipment will include, but is not limited to, the following:

Overhead Bridge Cranes (typical capacity may range from 15 tons to 600 tons);

Overhead Gantry Cranes (typical capacity may range from 15 tons to 480 tons);

Underhung Monorail Cranes (typical capacity may range from 5 tons to 25 tons);

Pedestal Cranes;

Derrick Cranes (typical capacity may range from 10 tons to 200 tons);

Below-the-Hook Devices; and

Base/Wall Mounted Jib Hoists/Booms.

Rehabilitation work may consist of constructing, repairing, replacing, and/or upgrading worn components of crane systems to make the equipment fully functional to support mission requirements. Components may include lifting beams and/or lifting devices, hoist machinery such as wire rope drums, speed reducers and open gearing, load brake systems, motors, brakes, wire rope, load blocks, load indicating systems (load cells), structural repairs, crane rails, crane access/egress and safety upgrades, operator cabs, painting, control systems (including variable frequency drives (VFDs) and programmable logic controllers (PLCs)), warning/alarm systems, electrical systems, rail feeders, and may include similar crane projects that fall under NAICS 238290. Rehabilitation and replacement crane work may require analysis, design, and documentation of requirements, stability, capacity uprating, loads tests, supporting and securing structures, and crane components by registered engineers.

Activities may include metals-based paint (which includes lead), asbestos, and other hazardous material removal; painting; final inspections and testing services; and classification/ marking of final product.

Work areas may be difficult to access, requiring entrance of confined spaces, traffic control, construction of scaffolding, or facilitation access by crane/lift.

PHASE I EVALUATION CRITERIA

BASIS FOR PHASE I SELECTION

Selection during Phase I of the solicitation will be made based on the best value to the Government using the Best Value Trade-Off Source Selection process in accordance with (IAW) FAR 15.101-2 and two-phase design-build procedures IAW FAR Subpart 36.3.

Phase One (1) Evaluation Factors: The following Evaluation Factors will be used to evaluate each proposal received under Phase 1 of the solicitation. All three Phase One Evaluation Factors are of approximately equal importance.

FACTOR 1: QUALIFICATIONS & CERTIFICATIONS

FACTOR 2: TECHNICAL APPROACH

FACTOR 3: PAST PERFORMANCE

FACTOR 1: QUALIFICATIONS & CERTIFICATIONS

The Government will evaluate and assess the extent of an offeror's relevant Qualifications & Certifications. The Designer of Record (DOR) identified by the offeror must have demonstrated expertise in at least two of the following areas: design, maintenance, and/or installation of heavy crane systems to include overhead bridge cranes, gantry cranes, and other lifting equipment. The DOR Team identified by the offeror must have demonstrated expertise in at least three of the following areas: certified Crane Inspector, Qualified Rigger/Signal Person, Crane Manufacturer Training, and/or LEEA Certifications.

The offeror must provide, as a minimum, the following evidence of the DOR's and DOR Team's qualifications:

Copy of the DOR's valid Professional Engineering (PE) License(s) in the applicable area(s) (mechanical, structural, or electrical engineering);

Copy of the DOR's relevant engineering degree(s) from an accredited institution(s); and

Detailed resume(s) of the DOR, highlighting:

o Deep expertise in crane systems, including descriptions of:

Specific types of cranes with which the DOR has worked;

Relevant projects (even if not identical to potential U.S. Army Corps of Engineers projects) that demonstrate expertise in similar work; and

Any specialized certifications (see below).

Specialized Certifications (for the DOR Team) in at least three of the following areas:

o Certified Crane Inspector: Certification demonstrating expertise in crane inspections.

o Qualified Rigger/Signal Person: Certification for installation and maintenance.

o Crane Manufacturer Training: Documentation of training from specific crane manufacturers (e.

g., Konecranes, Demag, etc.).

o LEEA (Lifting Equipment Engineers Association) Certifications: Certifications that are widely recognized in the lifting industry.

QUALIFICATIONS & CERTIFICATIONS ACCEPTABILITY ASSESSMENT: The SSEB shall use the acceptable and unacceptable rating method listed in the chart below to evaluate the offeror's proposal against the minimum requirements for qualifications and certifications and reach a single consensus for the offeror, selecting the most appropriate rating below. This rating considers the assessed acceptability of information submitted under this factor in the offeror's Proposal. The rationale for the conclusions reached by the SSEB will be included in the SSEB report.

Table 1. Certifications & Qualification Factor Ratings

Rating Definition

Acceptable Proposal meets the requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet the requirements of the solicitation.

FACTOR 2: TECHNICAL APPROACH

The Government will evaluate and assess the offeror's understanding of the requirements, feasibility of the proposed technical approach, and identification of risks and risk mitigation in the execution of Task Order projects where the Government provides minimal or limited design consisting of informational drawings and functional/performance specifications. The purpose of this factor is to determine whether the offeror has appropriate understanding of the D-B process and is not intended to limit an offeror to any proposed technical solution or to allow an offeror to provide less than the minimum requirements for Phases One and Two of the solicitation.

Based on your understanding of the MATOC scope of work, describe your technical approach for D-B Task Order projects where the Government provides minimal or limited design consisting of informational drawings and functional/performance specifications. This narrative must not exceed fifteen

(15) pages. Pages in excess of this limitation will be removed and not evaluated by the Source Selection Evaluation Board.

The offeror must address the following areas in its technical approach to include any risks and proposed approaches for risk mitigation:

Organization. Provide an organizational chart showing the reporting structure and lines of authority for the proposed team key functions such as project manager, superintendent, lead designer, safety manager, and others. Without identifying by name, describe the role of the key functional members during design and construction.

Cost effectiveness and expedited completion. Describe your process for providing a task order proposal that maximizes the Government's budget and will allow you to expedite completion of the project.

Describe your approach to streamlining design and construction to achieve reduced costs and meet aggressive schedules with consideration for operational and/or environmental restraints.

Communication and coordination. Describe your communication and coordination approach within the D- B team, and with the Government during the design and construction phases. Describe your approach for facilitating design and construction submittal reviews. Describe in detail the Designer of Record's involvement throughout the entire project period.

Quality control. Describe your approach for quality control for both design and construction. Include the following: quality control organization; review of design; verification of construction materials;

construction inspection; permit compliance; project documentation; and change request process.

Technical Factor Ratings for Factor 2: The combined technical/risk rating method includes consideration of risk in conjunction with the significant strengths, weaknesses, significant weaknesses, uncertainties, and deficiencies of the offeror's proposal. The combined technical/risk evaluation uses the risk descriptions listed in Table 2 and the adjectival rating descriptions listed in Table 3 to arrive at a combined technical/risk rating. The final rating depicts how well the offeror's proposal meets the technical factor requirements.

Table 2. Risk Descriptions

Adjectival Rating Description

Low Proposal may contain weakness/weaknesses which have low potential to cause disruption of schedule, increased cost, or degradation of performance. Normal contractor emphasis and normal Government monitoring will likely be able to overcome any difficulties.

Moderate Proposal contains a significant weakness or combination of weaknesses which may have a moderate potential to cause disruption of schedule, increased cost, or degradation of performance. Special contractor emphasis and close Government monitoring will likely be able to overcome any difficulties.

High Proposal contains a significant weakness or combination of weaknesses which is likely to have high potential to cause significant disruption of schedule, increased cost, or degradation of performance. Special contractor emphasis and close Government monitoring will unlikely be able to overcome any difficulties.

Unacceptable Proposal contains a deficiency or a combination of significant weakness that causes an unacceptable level of risk of unsuccessful performance.

Table 3. Combined Technical/Risk Rating Method

Adjectival Rating Description

Outstanding Proposal demonstrates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements and contains multiple strengths and/or at least one significant strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

Good Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and contains at least one strength or significant strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low to moderate.

Acceptable Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

Marginal Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is high Unacceptable Proposal does not meet requirements of the solicitation and, thus, contains one or more deficiencies and is unawardable, and/or risk of performance is unacceptably high.

FACTOR 3: PAST PERFORMANCE

There are three aspects to the past performance evaluation: Recency, Relevancy (including context of data) and Quality (including general trends in contractor performance and source of information).

a. The Government will evaluate and assess the extent of an offeror's relevant Construction and D-B past performance and proposed team's past performance (design firm and major subcontractors) on crane and hoist projects completed in the last seven (7) years and at least 50% complete at the time proposals are due. The Government will evaluate the offeror's depth and breadth of relevant crane and hoist design, manufacturing, and installation past performance. The Contractor should ensure that all project submissions presented address the elements within the relevancy definition presented in section e. below as applicable.

The Government will evaluate no more than eight (8) presented projects. The combined past performance demonstrated by the submitted projects must address the following:

Include at least one project that demonstrates Past Performance facilitating design for the end user

/customer from initial design concept through 100% design and subsequent construction of that design.

Include at least two crane projects demonstrating performance with large capacity (minimum of 50 tons) custom hoist and crane system not simply packaged components.

Include two examples of crane work to encompass both rehabilitation and new crane work as defined below. A minimum of one (1) example must be new.

Include at least two projects that demonstrate performance on a project for each of the following types of cranes:

Overhead bridge crane with a capacity of 50 tons or more.

Gantry cranes with capacity of 50 tons or more.

The contractor must submit signed copies of all interim and final ratings received during the time period of January 1, 2020, to September 1, 2025 as included in the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Contractor Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) or other databases using all CAGE /UEI numbers of team members (joint venture, teaming arrangement, or parent company/subsidiary /affiliate) that will be performing the work identified in the scope of work. All ratings must include the contact information, e-mail or phone, of the rating official.

Offerors including new cranes in which structure frame was fabricated by the proposed team will be considered more relevant and rated more favorably.

Offerors demonstrating performance with underhung monorail cranes with a capacity of 5 tons or more, fixed hoist machinery, derrick, or pedestal cranes with a capacity of 10 tons or more will be rated more favorably.

Fully completed projects will be rated more favorably than projects that are substantially complete projects. "Substantially complete" projects are defined as projects that are 100% designed and at least 50% construction progress at time of proposal due date.

Proposals including multiple new crane designs will be rated more favorably than those including mostly crane rehabilitation projects.

The following parameters apply for evaluation purposes:

"Design-Build" construction is defined as a civil-works type project in which the contractor is provided less than a full design and is required to: complete the design with a licensed Architect Engineer (A-E);

participate in design review; and accomplish full construction of the designed project.

"New" is defined as not as existing before or complete replacement of the entire crane to the tracks or support.

"Custom hoist and crane system" is demonstrated by design calculations and detail shop drawing development for custom designed hoist and crane systems that include but are not limited to gantry frames, bridge crane, trolley frames, end trucks, speed reducer, gearing, hoist drums, and load blocks, where components are NOT commercial off the shelf items.

"Packaged hoist and crane system": Example of packaged hoist and crane systems include but are not limited to designs that only include component sizing of standard catalog items of commercial off the shelf components; custom design calculation and detail shop drawings development are omitted.

Past performance for a proposed design firm and major subcontractors will only be evaluated if a letter of commitment is signed by each proposed firm and submitted with the proposal. A letter of commitment is not required if the offeror is a joint-venture, and the firm is part of the joint-venture agreement.

b. The Government will focus its inquiries on the offeror's (and major sub-contractors') record of performance as it relates to all solicitation requirements, including price, schedule, performance, and management of sub-contractors. Major sub-contractors are defined as members of an offeror's overall team who are expected to perform ten (10) percent or more of the proposed effort. Therefore, offerors are reminded to include the most current and relevant past performance efforts (within the past seven years) in their proposal. Absent any current and relevant past performance history or when the performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror will be assigned an "unknown confidence rating" and its proposal will not be evaluated either favorably or unfavorably on past performance.