Chicago Region - Past Performance Project Sheet.pdf
PDF 222 KB Posted
- Attached to
- 88th Readiness Division (RD) Preventative and Corrective Facility Maintenance Services, Chicago Region
- Solicitation number
- W912DY23R0038
About this file
This document is a template for submitting past performance references related to a federal contract solicitation for preventative and corrective facility maintenance services in the Chicago region issued by the Department of the Army Corps of Engineers Engineering Support Center Huntsville. The template requests information including the project title, customer organization, point of contact, contract or task order number, dollar value of performance, scope of work, relevance to the current solicitation, and any corrective actions taken on prior projects. It also asks contractors to describe whether they employed subcontractors previously and if so to provide details on utilization of small businesses, names, socioeconomic statuses, and subcontract values. Relevant experience could include previous maintenance services for government facilities. The response due date and award date for the current solicitation are not specified in the template.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 88thRD_Chicago Region_RFP_12-1-2023.pdf | ||
| FY23 B1 PWS - 88th RD Chicago Region 20231201.pdf | ||
| Chicago Region Pricing Workbook.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| RFI_Responses_Chicago.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Past Performance Project Sheet
Project Title:
Customer Organization: (Government Office or Company Name)
Customer Point of Contact: (Name, email address, telephone)
Contract/Task Order Number: (Customer’s Reference Number for non-federal customer)
Dollar value of your performance: (for a prime, this would be entire contract value, for a subcontractor this would be the value of the subcontract)
Description of scope for the overall project (limit to 250 words).
If your performance was as a subcontractor, the description of the scope of your performance.
Explanation of how this project is relevant to the current acquisition. Also, if problems were encountered, identify corrective actions.
Did your firm employ subcontractors on this project? If yes, then describe how your firm used this project to further small business subcontractor participation in accordance with FAR 52.219-8 Utilization of Small Business Concerns. Provide the name and social economic status (e.g., not small business, Small Business, 8(a) SB, HUBZone SB, SDVOSB, WOSB, etc.) of the firms you used as subcontractors. Provide the subcontract value for each firm. Or describe why there were no subcontracting opportunities for small businesses (such as 100% self-performance). (This subcontracting requirement applies to your firm even if your firm is also a SB and the acquisition is set-aside for SB).
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .