10_ProjNet_Answers_Final_21Apr17.pdf

UNCLASSIFIED\\FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Bid Inquiry Contractor Report All Inquiries

Project: DLA-Fuels Air Force Ph 9 Review: Pre Award Inquiries (00001) (sorted by CommentID ) Displaying 46 inquiries.

Id Discipline Sheet Detail Spec

6921766 Project Management PWS PWS

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

THIS IS A TEST

On: Apr 10 2017.

Government Response. . This was a test On: Apr 21 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6931372 General Area Wage Determination

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

It is believed that the Area Wage Determination for Reno Tahoe International Airport Site #1 ANG is incorrectly listed, and that the correct Area Wage Determination should be 2015-5595 and not 2015-5593. Will the Government please confirm if this is correct?

On: Apr 14 2017.

Government Response. . 2015-5595 is Correct. See revised Attachment 08 per RFP Amendment 01 On:

Apr 21 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6931373 General Area Wage Determination

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

It is believed that the Area Wage Determination for Gila Bend is incorrectly listed, and that the correct Area Wage Determination should be 2015-5469 and not 2015-5473. Will the Government please confirm if this is correct?

On: Apr 14 2017.

Government Response. . 2015-5469 is Correct. See revised Attachment 08 per RFP Amendment 01 On:

Apr 21 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6931374 General Area Wage Determination

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

It appears that the Area Wage Determination for Davis Monthan is missing from the list of Area Wage Determinations provided. Will the Government please supply the Area Wage Determination for Davis Monthan?

On: Apr 14 2017.

Government Response. . Correct. See revised Attachment 08 per RFP Amendment 01. On: Apr 21 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6931375 General RFP Instructions Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Is it the Government's intent to remove the requirement for an Initial Project Schedule for the proposal?

On: Apr 14 2017.

Page 1 of 10ProjNet: Logged In User

4/21/2017https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicPublicReportAl...

Government Response. . Yes, the requirement for an Initial Project Schedule for the proposal was removed. On: Apr 21 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6931378 General PWS Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Section 1.7.2 Quality Control Plan. UFGS 01 45 00.10 20, Quality Control for Minor Construction, provides requirements for a QCP for minor construction and repair. The PWS section 1.7.2 mixes quality and safety requirements that should be delineated between the QCP and APP. Would the government consider revising the PWS Section 1.7.2 to limit requirements to quality alone IAW UFGS 01 45 00.10 20? Safety items are addressed

APP.

On: Apr 14 2017.

Government Response. . The Quality Control Plan shall be submitted IAW PWS 1.7.2. Safety is a part of quality control. On: Apr 21 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6931380 General RFP and PWS Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Section 1.10.1 Schedule Requirements Inconsistencies. The Initial Project Schedule is no longer required by the Section 11, Volume 1, Tab B of the ITO, but it is still required by PWS Section 1.10.6, Appendix E Section 1.5, CDRL A004, and DIDS DESCA004. Does the government require an initial project schedule and a cost loaded schedule?

On: Apr 14 2017.

Government Response. . References in the PWS are post-award submittals. The cost-loaded schedule is a post award submittal. On: Apr 21 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6931400 General PPQs Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

With Air Force Phases 8 and 9 out at the same time, would it be acceptable to refer to and provide the Phase 8 PPQ for use in the Phase9 proposal in order to reduce the number of times the client has to fill these out?

On: Apr 14 2017.

Government Response. . Yes, this is acceptable On: Apr 21 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6933330 Program Management

Notice to Offerors -

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Paragraph 3 states "for any exercise of the option to extend services for up to six months". Please define the Governments expectation for RM tasks that will occur and at what sites or how many sites as this is a Firm Fixed Price proposal and most of the sites are only requiring an annual RM event.

On: Apr 17 2017.

Government Response. . The contractor should expect that the level of effort for maintenance services in 6 months would be approximately half the level of effort required in 12 months. On: Apr 21 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6933332 Contracting Site Plan and Schematic -

PWS 1.10.4

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

It is understood that the site plan and schematic will not be priced with the Contractor's proposal. However, what is the expectation on request for modification for this part of the scope, because the site plans and schematics are due

Page 2 of 10ProjNet: Logged In User within 180 days of task order notice to proceed. This 180 days includes RFP, proposal and development of plans for all sites.

On: Apr 17 2017.

Government Response. . The schedule for submission of the site plan and schematic will be adjusted based on when the modification to add this to the contract takes place. On: Apr 21 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6933334 Contracting Security Requirements -

PWS 1.9.4

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Does the USACE require that the Prime Contractor will service their own CAC applications and renewals? Is the Government prepared to provide the Contractor's Trusted Agent the necessary access to be able to provide this service for the Government so that almost all contractor personnel (sub and prime) under this Task Order maintain a

CAC?

On: Apr 17 2017.

Government Response. . Contractors will sponsor their CAC's in JPASS. Contractors will submit their CAC applications to the government Trusted Agent for processing. On: Apr 21 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6933336 Project Management PWS 3.3, 3.4 and 3.5

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

The PWS references the UFC 3-460-03. Please confirm which version of the UFC is referenced in this section as there are significant changes from the currently fully accepted version (2003) and the revised version (2016).

On: Apr 17 2017.

Government Response. . UFC 3-460-03, 2003 version is the correct version for this reference. On: Apr 21 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6933338 Project Management

3.2.12 - Filter Separators and 3.2.13 - Micronic

Filters Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Please confirm the requirement for the Contractors to replace filter elements upon a specific differential pressure as this will not be scheduled on a 'quarterly' basis. Are the Contractors responsible for procuring filter elements on their own or as part of the DLA's larger program for procurement of elements?

On: Apr 17 2017.

Government Response. . The site will normally be responsible for procuring the elements. In the event that the RMMR contractor would procure the element it would be done through a service order. On: Apr 21 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6933340 Fire Protection/Life Safety

3.2.18, 3.3.7, and 3.5.19 - Fire Protection System

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Please provide technical descriptions and configuration of the Fire Protection Systems if any at the installations included in this Phase. The inspection requirements of 3-610 vary in frequency, effort, and cost and without a complete basis of estimate for this firm fixed price proposal wide assumptions must be made.

On: Apr 17 2017.

Government Response. . All quantity information that is available has been provided. On: Apr 21 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

Page 3 of 10ProjNet: Logged In User

6933341 Project Management

3.4.15 - Hoses

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Provide an estimated quantity of hoses at each installation to provide a basis of estimate for the firm fixes portion of the proposal.

On: Apr 17 2017.

Government Response. . Provide an estimated quantity of hoses at each installation to provide a basis of estimate for the firm fixes portion of the proposal. On: Apr 21 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6933344 Contracting

4.7 Competition

Requirements - Service Orders

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Confirm that TEAMING PARTNER labor rates will be evaluated with our proposal and will be incorporated/accepted as fair and reasonable in the basis for award. Therefore, they will not be required to compete on individual Service Orders that they are responsible for performing but will provide justification for all ODC's that exceed micropurchase threshold. They will also be subject to level of effort evaluation by USACE for each SO.

On: Apr 17 2017.

Government Response. . The contractor shall comply with the competition requirements outlined in the PWS. The PWS does not reference key subcontractors or teaming partners. On: Apr 21 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6933345 Safety

1.5 Activity Hazard

Analysis, SSHO requirements

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

For the "high risk" activities, the contractor is required to have a separate Site Safety and Health Officer (SSHO) who shall have no other responsibilities, for any maintenance or repair being done on these activities. However, the government may waive this requirement if determined that a separate SSHO is not necessary. For the firm-fixed recurring maintenance activities, can the Government confirm whether this requirement is either waived or that a separate SSHO must always be provided for RM regardless to provide a fixed crew size as the configuration of the fueling systems is currently unknown. This is pertinent as an SSHO cannot be the same as a Site Supervisor without this waiver per PWS Section 1.5

On: Apr 17 2017.

Government Response. . A separate SSHO is not automatically required for every RM visit. A separate SSHO would only be required if an RM visit is considered "high risk" in accordance with the contract. On:

Apr 21 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6933347 Contracting FAR 52.217-8 Option to Extend Services

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Please provide the required notice period for exercising the option(s).

On: Apr 17 2017.

Government Response. . The Government will make the change in the Forthcoming amendment. FAR Clause 52.217-9 will state 30 days. On: Apr 21 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6933360 Contracting Para 14, Pg 88 Appendix D PWS Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

PWS, Appendix D, Para 14, Pg 88, Individual Clearance: Will USACE be the sponsoring agency for contractors to obtain the necessary security clearances?

Page 4 of 10ProjNet: Logged In User

On: Apr 17 2017.

Government Response. . No, USACE will not be the sponsoring agency. On: Apr 21 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6933362 Contracting Para 14, Pg 88 Appendix D PWS Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

PWS, Appendix D, Para 14, Pg 88, Access to Sensitive or Restricted Areas: Will the government be providing a list of security clearance requirements for each site? Without being able to contact the sites during the development of our proposal, it is unreasonable to expect the contractor to know this information ahead of time.

On: Apr 17 2017.

Government Response. . Each person on the contract is required to have a CAC card therefore they have access to the bases/forts/camps or installations. The government will not be providing a list of security clearance requirements for each site over an above the CAC requirement. After award the awardee will need to contract each installation for any additional access requirements. On: Apr 21 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6933365 Contracting Para 13 Appendix D PWS Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

PWS, Appendix D, Para 13: Can the government define what the specific security clearance requirements are per site so the contractor knows what clearance levels are needed?

On: Apr 17 2017.

Government Response. . See answer to ProjNet 6933362. On: Apr 21 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6933366 Contracting Section 3, Pg 60 Appendix B PWS Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

PWS, Appendix B, Section 3, Pg 60, Maintenance Reports: Reference states RM reports will be submitted within 30 "calendar" days of completion but Table 2. Assessment Items states "submitted with 10 "working" days". Please clarify if the standard is "calendar" or "working" days.

On: Apr 17 2017.

Government Response. . PWS Appendix B Section 3 is correct. Maintenance reports shall be submitted within 30 calendar days after completion of the RM effort. On: Apr 21 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6933367 Contracting Section 3, Pg 60 Appendix B PWS Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

PWS, Appendix B, Section 3, Pg 60, Maintenance Reports: Reference states RM reports will be submitted within "30" calendar days of completion but Table 2. Assessment Items states "submitted with "10" working days." Please clarify if the standard is "10" days or "30" days.

On: Apr 17 2017.

Government Response. . PWS Appendix B Section 3 is correct. Maintenance reports shall be submitted within 30 calendar days after completion of the RM effort. On: Apr 21 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6933368 Contracting General Information, Para 1.9.4, Pg 11 Section 1 PWS

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

PWS, Section 1, General Information, Para 1.9.4, Pg 11. Security Requirements: Will the government be providing the specific access requirements for contractors to enter each installation?

On: Apr 17 2017.

Government Response. . See answer to ProjNet 6933362. On: Apr 21 2017

Page 5 of 10ProjNet: Logged In User

Current Request Status: Request Closed Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6933369 Contracting Pg 121 Appendix H PWS Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

PWS, Appendix H, Pg 121, There is no real property listed for Lackland Air Training Annex Site #1. Will this be provided?

On: Apr 17 2017.

Government Response. . No. Lackland Air Training Annex Site is not a requirement in this contract. On:

Apr 21 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6933370 Contracting Pg 121 Appendix H PWS Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

PWS, Appendix H, Pg 121, There is no real property listed for Lackland Air Force Base Site #1 ANG. Will this be provided?

On: Apr 17 2017.

Government Response. . No. Lackland Air Force Base is not a requirement in this contract On: Apr 21 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6933371 Contracting pg 25 Para 3.2.14 Dikes PWS Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

PWS, Para 3.2.14 Dikes, pg 25: What shall be the procedure for draining all water from the interior of dike basins during each maintenance inspection if the facility does not have a spill prevention and response plan?

On: Apr 17 2017.

Government Response. . The contractor shall coordinate with each QAE to determine these requirements after award. On: Apr 21 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6933372 Contracting pg 117 QASP, Para 3.3 PWS Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

PWS, QASP, Para 3.3, pg 117, Deficiencies and Compliance: If a deficiency is found during a warranty period, will a "determination" also be made if the deficiency was caused by operator error or neglect?

On: Apr 17 2017.

Government Response. . Warranty requirements will follow FAR 52.246-20 Warranty of Services. On:

Apr 21 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6933374 Contracting Pg 126 Appendix D, Section 14 PWS Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

PWS, Appendix D, Section 14, Pg 126, Individual Clearance: Will USACE be the sponsoring agency for contractors to obtain the necessary security clearances?

On: Apr 17 2017.

Government Response. . No, USACE will not be the sponsoring agency On: Apr 21 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6933375 Contracting Pg 60 Appendix B, Section 3 PWS Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Page 6 of 10ProjNet: Logged In User

PWS, Appendix B, Section 3, Pg 60, Maintenance Reports: Reference states RM reports will be submitted within 30 "calendar" days of completion but Table 2. Assessment Items states "submitted with 10 "working" days". Please clarify if the standard is "calendar" or "working" days.

PWS, Appendix D, Section 14, Pg 126, Individual Clearance: Will the government be providing a list of security clearance requirements for each site?

On: Apr 17 2017.

Government Response. . PWS Appendix B Section 3 is correct. Maintenance reports shall be submitted within 30 calendar days after completion of the RM effort. On: Apr 21 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6933377 Contracting Pg 60 Appendix B, Section 3 PWS Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

PWS, Appendix B, Section 3, Pg 60, Maintenance Reports: Reference states RM reports will be submitted within "30" calendar days of completion but Table 2. Assessment Items states "submitted with "10" working days." Please clarify if the standard is "10" days or "30" days.

On: Apr 17 2017.

Government Response. . PWS Appendix B Section 3 is correct. Maintenance reports shall be submitted within 30 calendar days after completion of the RM effort. On: Apr 21 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6933378 Contracting Pg 17 & 18, Para 1.20 Warranty: Section 1.20 PWS

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

PWS, Section 1.20, Pg 17 & 18, Para 1.20 Warranty: Will the Contractor be reimbursed for time and materials when responding to a warranty covered repair where it has been determined the deficiency was caused by operator error or neglect?

On: Apr 17 2017.

Government Response. . All warranty related repairs are subject to laws governing warranty items. If something like this happens the contractor has the legal right to submit a claim. The process would follow all applicable contract regulations and clauses. On: Apr 21 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6933380 Contracting Pg 17 Section 1.17 PWS Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

PWS, Section 1.17, Pg 17, Technical Library: What is the government's expectation if all of the Operations and Maintenance documentation on each asset is not available and provided to the Contractor?

On: Apr 17 2017.

Government Response. . PWS paragraph 1.17 states that the contractor will provide this information.

The installation QAE may be able to provide some, information but this is not guaranteed. The contractor shall gather and provide all required information. On: Apr 21 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6933382 Contracting Pg 17 Section 1.17 PWS Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

PWS, Section 1.17, Pg 17, Technical Library: Is it the government's intention for the Contractor to use the Operations and Maintenance Documentation provided to them in order to build and maintain the Technical Library?

On: Apr 17 2017.

Government Response. . PWS paragraph 1.17 states that the contractor will provide this information.

The installation QAE may be able to provide some, information but this is not guaranteed. The contractor shall gather and provide all required information. On: Apr 21 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

Page 7 of 10ProjNet: Logged In User

6933383 General Page 47 A Management Plan Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

With the understanding of certain dedicated personnel requirements upon award, may contractors propose the same team of personnel for AF Phase 9 as they propose for an unawarded TO under the BOA?

On: Apr 17 2017.

Government Response. . Proposals for solicitations are evaluated independently. The proposal must meet the requirements of each solicitation. On: Apr 21 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6933384 Contracting Pg 16 Section 1.15 PWS Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

PWS, Section 1.15, Pg 16, Operations and Maintenance Documentation: Who will be providing the Contractor with this information?

On: Apr 17 2017.

Government Response. . All available information is provided with this solicitation. The installation QAE may be able to provide additional information post-award but this is not guaranteed. On: Apr 21 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6933385 Contracting Pgs 47-48 FACTOR II: PAST

PERFORMANCE RFP

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

RFP, FACTOR II: PAST PERFORMANCE, Pgs 47-48: With multiple RFPs getting released can PPQ's for other BoA solicitations be reused from the last 12 months?

On: Apr 17 2017.

Government Response. . Current BOA holders, with previously awarded orders-must submit only CPARs information. No PPQs are required from current BOA holders with previously awarded orders. Otherwise, yes, PPQ's can be reused if they meet the requirements of the solicitation. On: Apr 21 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6933386 Contracting Pg. 50 FACTOR III – PRICE RFP Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

RFP, FACTOR III – PRICE, Pg. 50: Where will the 2080 hours for each dedicated (3) positions be shown to ensure that it is captured for the PWS sections 1.5.1, 1.5.2, and 1.5.4 requirements? (6240 hrs total)

On: Apr 17 2017.

Government Response. . It is at the discretion of the Offeror to determine how to price these costs. On:

Apr 21 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6933389 Contracting Pg 6 Section 1.5.1, 1.5.2, 1.5.4 PWS Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

PWS, Section 1.5.1, 1.5.2, 1.5.4, Pg 6: States that the contractor has to provide (3) positions as task order specific with no other duties. PM, QCM and Safety Manager. Is it the intent of the government for the contractor to provide fully burdened rates in this pricing proposal for 2080 hours for each of the three positions?

On: Apr 17 2017.

Government Response. . It is at the discretion of the Offeror to determine how to price these costs On:

Apr 21 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6933390 Contracting Pg 49 Appendix A, Section 3.4.1, Response and Completion

Times

PWS

Page 8 of 10ProjNet: Logged In User

PWS, Appendix A, Section 3.4.1, Response and Completion Times, Pg 49: States Routine SO's Response Time will be accomplished within 18 Calendar Days. Not all of the sites listed are Active Duty Air Force and have only four (4) day work weeks. Should the day count not be 18 Duty Days?

On: Apr 17 2017.

Government Response. . According to the PWS paragraph 3.4.l, the completion time is 30 calendar days. On: Apr 21 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6933391 Contracting Pg 49 Appendix A, Paragraph 3.4.1

Response and Completion Times

PWS

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

PWS, Appendix A, Paragraph 3.4.1 Response and Completion Times, Pg 49: States Routine SO's Completions will be completed within 30 Calendar Days. Not all of the sites listed are Active Duty Air Force and have only four (4) day work weeks. Should the day count not be 30 Duty Days?

On: Apr 17 2017.

Government Response. . According to the PWS paragraph 3.4.1, the completion time is 30 calendar days. On: Apr 21 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6933392 General Pages 43 and 44 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Please confirm that the initial project schedule and the sample task order schedule are the same, and advise where CEHNC would like it to be placed within the proposal.

On: Apr 17 2017.

Government Response. . The sample task order schedule or initial project schedule referenced are not required to be included in the proposal. Will be addressed in upcoming amendment. On: Apr 21 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6933393 Contracting Pg 45 Appendix A, Paragraph 1.0 General PWS

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

PWS, Appendix A, Paragraph 1.0 General, Pg 45: states that all SO are considered FFP does this also include NTE and Emergency SO?

On: Apr 17 2017.

Government Response. . Yes. All service orders are firm fixed price. The price on all service orders including completed NTE and Emergency SO's will be evaluated for price reasonableness and negotiated if required. On: Apr 21 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6933396 General SF1449 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Please clarify if the SF1449 Continuation Sheets need to be completed and submitted with the proposal. If so, please specify if CEHNC desires that only the SF1449 (through page 27 from the original RFP) be submitted along with the amendment acknowledgements.

On: Apr 17 2017.

Government Response. . Providing pages through 27 of the SF1449 and the amendment signature pages will suffice. On: Apr 21 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

Page 9 of 10ProjNet: Logged In User

6933401 General SB Requirements

Will CEHNC suggest a "total contract value" on which offerors should base their proposed SB Participation and SB Subcontracting Plans? In doing so, there will be greater consistency in proposals and evaluations will be more easily facilitated. For example, we suggest the following: "All offerors should base their SB Participation Plans on an anticipated total contract value of $25M (or other amount determined by client). Furthermore, all LB offerors required to submit SB Subcontracting Plans should also use an anticipated contract value of $25M (or other amount determined by client) when determining their available subcontracting dollars and categorical SB subcontracting goals."

On: Apr 17 2017.

Government Response. . HNC will not add a "total contract value" to base proposed SB Participation and SB Subcontracting Plans. Offerors shall base it upon total value of your proposed cost. On: Apr 21 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6933408 General Page 47 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Please confirm that the only resume required for inclusion within the proposal is for the Project Manager.

On: Apr 17 2017.

Government Response. . Confirmed, Only resume required in the proposal is for the Project Manager.

On: Apr 21 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

Report Complete

UNCLASSIFIED\\FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Patent 11/892,984 ProjNet property of ERDC since 2004.

Page 10 of 10ProjNet: Logged In User