A21_SolAttch1-BlissQASP_15Jul2014.docx
DOCX document 20 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W912DY15R0024
About this file
Solicitation Attachment 1
View the file
Other files
Show all 28
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PERFORMANCE-BASED QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PLAN (QASP) FOR
Initial Outfitting and Transition Planning Services Ft. Bliss Replacement Hospital
1. PURPOSE.
This Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) has been developed as the principal basis for assessing overall performance of the technical support for the Initial Outfitting and Transition services effort. This document will be used by the Government to evaluate the Contractor’s performance to assure they are timely, effective, and are delivering the services and products specified in the contract.
This QASP provides the methodology by which the Contractor's performance will be monitored and to establish performance benchmarks that ensure a quantifiable basis for measuring effectiveness. The plan is designed to limit surveillance to the minimum necessary to verify that the Contractor is satisfactorily performing services directly related to the performance requirements of the Performance Work Statement (PWS). The performance requirements are those designated with corresponding performance measures and performance standards. Surveillance will be accomplished in accordance with the Performance Requirements Summary (PRS).
2. GOVERNMENT SURVEILLANCE
The Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) is identified in the PWS. COR authority will be limited to administering specific technical aspects of the contract. The PWS will identify specific guidelines and clearly detail the limits of the COR’s authority. The COR will:
a. Monitor Contractor performance in accordance with this QASP.
b. Coordinate priorities of support, resources, and associated schedules.
3. SURVEILLANCE METHODS
Surveillance of contractor performance is the method used by the Government to determine whether the contractor is effectively and efficiently complying with all terms and conditions of the contract. The COR may use the surveillance methods listed below in the administration of this QASP:
a. Inspection: A method carried out by visual examination of a product (e.g., meeting minutes, data from testing, plans, procedures, reports, or documentation) or process.
b. Analysis: A method that is carried out by detailed examination to assess the application of the techniques used in order to determine if they are appropriate and effective.
c. Demonstration: A method carried out by operation of a process from start to finish or the operation of the system, or part of the system, that relies on observable functional operation.
d. Customer Feedback: A method carried out by soliciting customer/end user satisfaction of technical services performed by the contractor.
4. PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY
The performance requirements requiring Government surveillance, the performance standards, and the surveillance methods are set forth in the PRS, Attachment (1). The performance requirements correspond to paragraph 3 of the PWS. The performance measures to be used are technical accuracy, clarity, completeness, timeliness, and effectiveness. The performance standards define what is considered acceptable performance and are the benchmarks against which performance will be measured. The Acceptable Quality Level (AQL) is the maximum acceptable variation from the performance standard. The surveillance method is how performance will be checked. The COR will use the PRS to evaluate the Contractor’s performance to assure they are timely, effective, and are delivering the services and products specified in the contract.
5. PERFORMANCE REVIEWS AND EVALUATIONS
COR Responsibility: The COR will conduct monthly performance reviews and evaluations with the Contractor based upon the information obtained through the surveillance methods identified above pertaining to the performance outlined in the PRS. The following criteria will be used for performance evaluations:
| EXCELLENT: |
| Performance significantly exceeds contractual requirements to the Government’s benefit; above the minimal acceptable level. |
| SATISFACTORY: |
| Performance meets contractual requirements; minimal acceptable level. |
| UNSATISFACTORY: |
| Performance does not meet contractual requirements; below minimal acceptable level. |
Contractor Responsibility: The failure of the Contractor to meet the AQL set in the PRS may result in a reduction in contract payment. Reviews and evaluations will form the basis for determining compliance with performance requirements, measures, and standards. Performance reviews will be used to identify the degree of success or failure by the Contractor. Failure to perform due to Contractor delay or failure to comply with the mutually developed project schedule will be considered a failure in performance threatening the execution of the program and will result in a basis for Government consideration. The Government reserves the right to withhold payment of invoices until deficient action is completed and/or consideration is provided.
6. GOVERNMENT RESOURCES AND DEFINITIONS
The following definitions of Government Resources are applicable to this QASP:
Contracting Officer: A person duly appointed with the authority to enter into, administer, or terminate contracts and make related determinations and findings on behalf of the Government. The Contracting Officer is ultimately responsible for the final determination of the adequacy of the Contractor’s performance.
Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR). The COR is an individual designated and authorized in writing by the Contracting Officer to perform specific technical or administrative functions of a contract. The COR engages in Government surveillance of the Contractor’s performance. The COR may evaluate the Contractor’s performance and document any non-compliance, but only the Contracting Officer may take action against the Contractor for unacceptable performance. The COR is not authorized to make any commitments or changes that will affect price, quality, quantity, delivery, or any other term or condition of the contract.
ATTACHMENT 1
Initial Outfitting and Transition Initial Outfitting and Transition Services Ft. Bliss Replacement Hospital
TASK ORDER QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PLAN (QASP)
| Performance Objective |
| PWS Reference |
| Acceptable Performance Level (days = calendar days) |
| Monitoring Method |
| 1. Monthly update and maintenance of all scheduling timelines and charts via online database throughout the project. |
| Description of Services, |
Section 3.2.
| Schedule incorporating any changes since previous reporting period posted by the second Wednesday of every month. |
| Observation by COR of schedules |
| 2. Development of an IO&T Schedule including phasing plans for the delivery and installation of all items. |
| Description of Services, |
Section 3.2.
| Completed IOT schedule submitted NLT 15 days from scheduled submittal date. |
| Observed by the COR Review of submitted master schedule. |
| 3. Develop procurement plan based upon equipment production, manufacturing, procurement timelines and construction/renovation schedules. |
| Description of Services, |
Section 3.4.
Completed plan NLT 15 days from scheduled submittal date.
Observation by COR
| 4. Preparation of submittal packages for items to be procured for government evaluation, approval and signature by the specified government official. |
| Description of Services, |
Section 3.4.
| No contractor actions/errors/omissions that will result in late procurements that will delay FOD |
| Observed by COR, observed by government equipment planner through review of submittals and status reports |
| 5. Provide capital equipment inventory to include the collection of data from the local MTF Property Book Officer from all equipment with a purchase value limit. |
| Description of Services, |
Section 3.4.
| Within 30 days following move-in |
| Observation by COR, observed by government equipment planner and MTF Chief of Facilities through review of submittals and status reports |
| 6. Attend regular meetings and scheduled reviews in person, by telephone, or VTC. |
| Description of Services , |
Section 3.2.
| 95% Attendance |
| Observation by COR; observation by government HFPO through review of status reports |
| 7. Incorporation of the government’s decisions regarding furniture, furnishings, equipment lists and strategies into the IO&T specification packages. |
| Description of Services, Inclusive |
Section 3.0.
| Completed specification package accepted by Government. |
| Observation by the COR by review of submitted specification package. |
8. Coordinate equipment certification (e.g., radiology systems) where applicable.
Description of Services , Inclusive Section 3.0..
| Zero discrepancies |
| Observation by COR, observed by government equipment planner and MTF Chief of Facilities through review of submittals and status reports |
9. Provide all training documentation including roster to KO.
| To be delivered within 15 calendar days from the completion of all training. |
| Observation by COR, observed by government equipment planner and MTF Chief of Facilities through review of submittals and status reports |
10. Combating Trafficking in Persons
| Zero incidents |
| COR review of contract to ensure inclusion of FAR 52.222-50, and also COR monitoring of contractor performance to ensure the contractor has educated its employees regarding human trafficking. |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .