Amendment R0004_4-20-2022.pdf

W68MD920551263

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

RFP W912DW22R0004

Amendment R0004

(Please see Continuation Page for more details)

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 23

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 20-Apr-2022

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street , County, State and Zip Code) X W912DW22R0004

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

16-Mar-2022

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

20-Apr-2022

CODE

USA ENGINEER DISTRICT, SEATTLE

ATTN: CENWS-CT

4735 EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH, BLDG. 1202

SEATTLE WA 98134-2388

W912DW 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W912DW22R0004

W912DW22R0004 R0004

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

The following have been added by full text: CONTINUATION PAGE R0004

This amendment four (0004) provides for the following:

1. Sections 00 22 00 (Basis of Award and Evaluation Factors for Award) and 00 72 00-A (Index of Drawings) was revised.

2. The Period of Performance was revised from 365 calendar days to 547 calendar days.

3. Clause 52.211-10, Commencement, Prosecution, and Completion of Work was revised.

4. The following specification/plans were revised:

Section 33 40 00 Storm Sewer Utilities CD103 TESC Demolition Plan CD104 TESC Demolition Plan4 CD105 TESC Demolition Plan CP101 Paving Plan CP102 Paving Plan CP103 Paving Plan CP104 Paving Plan CP105 Paving Plan CU501 Utility Details ED103 Telecommunications Demolition Site Plan ES102 Electrical Site Plan

5. The proposal due date/time is extended to 1:00 PM (Seattle Time) on Thursday, 28 April 2022.

6. The attached revised sections are to be replaced in their entirety. Specifications changes are generally identified, for convenience, either by strikeout for deletions, and double underlining of text for additions or a single dark line in the margin. All portions of the revised sections shall apply whether changes have been indicated or not.

7. NOTICE TO OFFERORS: Offerors must acknowledge receipt of all amendments including this amendment by number and date on their proposal.

W68MD920551263

Department of Veteran’s Affairs American Lake (VAAL) Phase 2A Site Development at Lakew ood WA.

This is a Service Disabled Veteran Ow ned Small Business (SDVOSB) Set-Aside, Design Bid Build (DBB) Acquisition, Using the Best Value Low est Priced Technically Acceptable (LPTA) Procurement Process.

For /Site Visit Information please see FAR provision 52.236-27 Alt 1, Site Visit (Construction).

For technical questions and the ProjNet Bidder Inquiry process, please see Section 00 21 16.

As this is not a sealed bid, offers w ill not be opened publicly.

JOHN P SCOLA 206-762-2122

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".

10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS

NEGOTIATED

16-Mar-2022

(RFP)

(IFB)

X

CALL:

B. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS)

2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

SEALED BID

3. DATE ISSUED

9. FOR INFORMATION A. NAME

SOLICITATION

NSN 7540-01-155-3212 1442-101 STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 4-85)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.236-1(e)

11. The Contractor shall begin performance w ithin _______10 calendar days and complete it w ithin ________547 calendar days after receiving aw ard, X notice to proceed. This performance period is X mandatory, negotiable. (See _________________________52.211-10

12 A. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS?

(If "YES," indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12B.)

X YES NO

13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:

A. Sealed offers in original and __________1 copies to perform the w ork required are due at the place specif ied in Item 8 by ___________ local time ______________28 Apr 2022 (date). If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers must be publicly opened at that time.

shall be marked to show the offeror's name and address, the solicitation number, and the date and time of fers are due.

B. An offer guarantee X is, is not required.

C. All offers are subject to the (1) w ork requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.

D. Offers providing less than _______90 calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due w ill not be considered and w ill be rejected.

SOLICITATION, OFFER,

AND AWARD

(Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

1. SOLICITATION NO.

IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by offeror.

4. CONTRACT NO.

7. ISSUED BY CODE

USA ENGINEER DISTRICT, SEATTLE

ATTN: CENWS-CT

4735 EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH, BLDG. 1202

SEATTLE WA 98134-2388

W912DW

PAGE OF PAGES

CODE W912DW

(Title, identifying no., date):

12B. CALENDAR DAYS

01:00 PM (hour)

Sealed envelopes containing offers

USA ENGINEER DISTRICT, SEATTLE

ATTN: CENWS-CT

4735 EAST MARGINAL WAY SOUTH, BLDG. 1202

SEATTLE WA 98134-2388

5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NO. 6. PROJECT NO.

8. ADDRESS OFFER TO (If Other Than Item 7)

206-764-6817FAX:TEL: 206-316-3168 TEL: FAX: 206-764-6817

W912DW22R0004 1 OF 2

R0004

20B. SIGNATURE

(REV. 4-85)STANDARD FORM 1442 BACK

TO SIGN

NSN 7540-01-155-3212

SOLICITATION, OFFER, AND AWARD (Continued) (Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

CODE FACILITY CODE

17. The offeror agrees to perform the w ork required at the prices specif ied below in strict accordance w ith the terms of this solicitation, if this offer is accepted by the Government in w riting w ithin ________ calendar days after the date offers are due.

the minimum requirements stated in Item 13D. Failure to insert any number means the offeror accepts the minimum in Item 13D.)

AMOUNTS SEE SCHEDULE OF PRICES

18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.

19. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation -- give number and date of each)

AMENDMENT NO.

DATE

20A. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN

OFFER (Type or print)

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

21. ITEMS ACCEPTED:

22. AMOUNT 23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

24. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN ITEM

(4 copies unless otherwise specified)

CODE

(Insert any number equal to or greater than

20C. OFFER DATE

25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PURSUANT TO

10 U.S.C. 2304(c) 41 U.S.C. 253(c)

CODE27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY:26. ADMINISTERED BY

(Include ZIP Code)14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR 15. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code)

See Item 14

(Include only if different than Item 14)16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS

30B. SIGNATURE

29. AWARD (Contractor is not required to sign this document.)

document and return _______ copies to issuing office.) Contractor agrees Your of f er on this solicitation, is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This award con-to f urnish and deliv er all items or perf orm all work, requisitions identif ied summates the contract, which consists of (a) the Gov ernment solicitation and on this f orm and any continuation sheets f or the consideration stated in this y our of f er, and (b) this contract award. No f urther contractual document is contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract shall be necessary .

gov erned by (a) this contract award, (b) the solicitation, and (c) the clauses, representations, certif ications, and specif ications or incorporated by ref er-ence in or attached to this contract.

30A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED 31A. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

30C. DATE

(Type or print)

TEL: EMAIL:

31B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 31C. AWARD DATE

BY

CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE

(Contractor is required to sign this28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT

(M ust be fully completed by offeror)OFFER

R0004

W912DW22R0004 R0004

SECTION 00 10 00 – SOLICITATION

The required response date/time has changed from 26-Apr-2022 01:00 PM to 28-Apr-2022 01:00 PM.

The contractor period of performance end date has increased by 182 days from 365 days to 547 days.

W912DW22R0004 R0004

SECTION 00 22 00

BASIS OF AWARD AND EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

1.0 BASIS OF AWARD

Award of this Contract will be made to the responsible Offeror submitting the Lowest Priced Technically Acceptable (LPTA) proposal in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 15.101-2. This solicitation will result in the award of a firm-fixed price construction contract.

The evaluation of each proposal will be solely on the basis of evaluation factors found in this section (00 22 00). The Government will evaluate each proposal on an Acceptable/Unacceptable basis only with respect to the non-price evaluation factors (criteria) described herein. To be considered for award, a proposal must be rated “Acceptable” in every non-price factor. Award will be to the Offeror who presents the Acceptable proposal (Factors 1, 2 and 3) with the overall total lowest price (based on the total of all line items on the Bid/Price Schedule).

The Offeror’s proposal shall contain a response to all factors and meet the minimum submittal requirements stated.

Penalty for making false statements in proposals is prescribed in 18 U.S. Code § 1001.

In accordance with FAR 15.306(a)(3), the Government intends to evaluate proposals and make award without discussions.

2.0 FACTORS TO BE EVALUATED

TABLE 1: Technical and Non-Technical Evaluation Factors and Price Factor: Description:

Factor 1 Relevant Experience of Offeror Factor 2 Relevant Experience of Team Factor 3 Past Performance of Offeror

Acceptability of your proposal will be based on all non-price Factors receiving an acceptable rating by the Government (Please see the evaluation method of each Factor below of how “acceptability” will be determined in Factors 1, 2 and 3). The proposal will be evaluated according to the criteria for each Non-Price Evaluation Factor of this section.

3.0 EVALUATION PROCESS:

Proposals will be evaluated by a Source Selection Evaluation Board.

The evaluation process consists of three parts:

1. Proposal Compliance Review. This is an initial review to ensure all required forms and certifications are complete, and a complete proposal is received. The initial review of each of the proposals will be conducted to check for apparent errors, omissions and areas which require clarification. The purpose of this preliminary review session is to eliminate minor irregularities or apparent clerical mistakes. This preliminary evaluation will ensure each proposal contains the Volume I (Technical) and Volume II (Price) separately and the correct number of copies.

2. Relevant Experience and Past Performance. Relevant Experience and Past Performance will be evaluated according to the Non-Price Evaluation Factors found within this section (00 22 00).

3. Price Evaluation. The Government will evaluate price for fairness and reasonableness using price analysis.

Price will also be verified for unbalancing of line items.

3.1 Definitions:

Clarification is a limited exchange with an Offeror for the sole purpose of eliminating minor irregularities, informalities, or apparent clerical mistakes in the proposal or to address adverse past performance not previously addressed with the Offeror. Clarifications do not give an Offeror the opportunity to revise or modify its proposal and are used, as necessary, when not opening discussions.

Communications are a limited exchange with an Offeror used to assist in determinations of the competitive range. Communications are limited to enhancing Government understanding of proposals and addressing adverse past performance information not previously addressed if said information is the determining factor preventing an Offeror from being included in the competitive range. Such communications shall not be used to cure proposal deficiencies or material omissions, or otherwise revise the proposal.

Discussions are exchanges (i.e., negotiations) in a competitive environment that are undertaken with the intent of allowing the Offeror to revise its proposal. Discussions take place after establishment of the competitive range. See FAR 15.306(d).

Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) is a process used in competitive negotiated contracting where the best value is expected to result from selection of the technically acceptable proposal with the lowest evaluated price. See FAR 15.101-2.

Past Performance is the assessment of the Offeror’s probability of successfully completing the minimum RFP requirements.

Recent - All submitted projects shall be 100 percent construction complete, accepted by the client, and completed within six (6) years of the issue date of this solicitation, i.e., all submitted projects shall have a completion date on or before the issue date of this solicitation.

Similar is not identical but showing a resemblance in qualities or characteristics of the project.

Source Selection is the process used in competitive, negotiated contracting to select the proposal that offers the best value to the Government.

4.0 EVALUATION FACTORS:

4.1 Non-Price Evaluation Factors:

Proposals shall concisely, accurately, and completely provide the information required for each of the following non-price evaluation factors.

NOTE: Absence of complete information will be deemed as if no support information was provided for that factor. Proposals which do not meet the minimum requirements of any non-price evaluation factors shall be determined to be UNACCEPTABLE and are not eligible for award consideration. NO assumptions may be made by the Government. Your proposal must clearly demonstrate the requisite experience to receive an acceptable rating for each of the following factors:

Table 2: Evaluation Factors: Location: Description:

Factor 1 Volume 1, Tab A Relevant Experience of Offeror Factor 2 Volume 1, Tab B Relevant Experience of Team Factor 3 Volume 1, Tab C Past Performance of Offeror

5.0 FACTOR 1 – Relevant Experience of Offeror:

5.1 Definitions for Factors 1.

For the purpose of Factor 1 the following definitions (characteristics) will apply:

Complexity means the many varied elements of work or sequencing of the work required for a project of this nature.

Magnitude means the dollar value of the project examples is equal to or greater than $12,000,000.

Scope means containing many of the elements of work and of physical size in terms of square feet, lineal feet, square yards, cubic feet, cubic yards, or tons of material. Elements of work include asphalt paving, underground telecommunications, electrical, steam lines, watermains, sanitary sewer and storm water treatment facilities, and landscaping.

Reference definitions from paragraph 3.1 for the terms “recent” and “similar.”

5.2 Submission Requirements for Factor 1 (The page limit for this factor is two (2) typewritten pages per project, single-sided):

The Offeror shall submit project experience for a minimum of two (2) and no more than three (3) recent construction projects demonstrating relevant experience as the Prime Contractor on projects with a construction value of at least $12,000,000. If more than three (3) projects are submitted, only the first three (3) will be evaluated, in the order they are presented in the proposal.

Offeror shall demonstrate specific minimum experience in the following areas:

Submitted project(s) must at a minimum demonstrate the Offeror as Prime Contractor on project(s) of similar scope, magnitude, and complexity as defined in paragraph 5.1.

Offeror must use Attachment 1, Offeror or Key Subcontractor Experience Form. Use one form for each project.

Offeror should describe each project with enough detail to ensure that the Government can meaningfully assess whether the project(s) submitted were recent and relevant to this project. Indefinite-Delivery, Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Contracts, where numerous Task Orders are summed up to meet the minimum construction dollar value identified herein, are not acceptable.

Notes:

If the Offeror is submitting any projects as a partner of a Joint Venture (JV), the DUNS, unique entity identifier from SAM.gov and CAGE Code for each firm representing the JV must be included in the proposal. (See Attachment 1). Submit a copy of the fully executed Joint Venture Agreement (See Section 00 21 16 for details).

5.3 Rating Method and Standard for Factor 1– Relevant Experience of Offeror:

The Government reserves the right to verify the experience record of submitted projects by reviewing the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) and Past Performance Information Retrieval system (PPIRS), when available.

Table 3 will be used to evaluate Factor 1:

Table 3: Technical Acceptable/Unacceptable Rating Method Rating: Description:

Acceptable: Proposal meets the requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable: Proposal does not meet the requirements of the solicitation.

A rating of Acceptable will be given if all the criteria for Factor 1 are met.

A rating of Unacceptable will be given if any of the criteria for Factor 1 is not met.

6.0 FACTOR 2 (Volume 1, Tab B) – Relevant Experience of Team:

6.1 Definitions for Factor 2:

For Factor 2 the following definitions (characteristics) will apply:

Complexity means the many varied elements of work or sequencing of the work required for a project of this nature.

Magnitude means the dollar value of the project examples is equal to or greater than $5,000,000.

Scope means containing many of the elements of work and of physical size in terms of square feet, lineal feet, square yards, cubic feet, cubic yards, or tons of material. Elements of work include asphalt paving, underground telecommunications, electrical, steam lines, watermains, sanitary sewer and storm water treatment facilities, and landscape.

Key Subcontractor means an entity other than the Prime who at a minimum directly performed at least 50% of all major or critical aspects of the work. The Key Subcontractor will be part of the team performing on this requirement. The Offeror must submit Attachment 2 (Letter of Commitment) for each Key Subcontractor which submitted project example(s) for evaluation.

Team is the prime contractor and its subcontracting firms, taken as a whole.

Reference definitions from paragraph 3.1 for the terms “recent” and “similar.”

6.2 Submission Requirements for Factor 2 (The page limit for this factor is three (3) typewritten pages per project, single-sided):

The Offeror shall submit project experience for a minimum of two (2) and no more than four (4) recent construction projects demonstrating relevant experience as the Prime Contractor, Offeror acting as a Key Subcontractor or performed by a proposed Key Subcontractor of projects with a construction value of at least $5,000,000. Offerors may resubmit projects from Factor 1 for Factor 2.

If more than four (4) project examples are submitted, only the first four (4) will be evaluated, in the order they are presented in the proposal.

Offeror shall demonstrate specific minimum experience in the following areas.

The submitted projects, when combined, must demonstrate experience in all three (3) areas indicated below. Note all three (3) areas do not necessarily need to be present in any one project. However, projects which do not demonstrate at least one of the three (3) areas will not be evaluated. An individual project is considered relevant if it at a minimum meets at least one of the following three (3) areas:

6.2.1 Demolition of existing buildings containing hazardous material and requiring abatement of similar scope.

6.2.2 Underground Utility construction or relocation with similar scope and complexity.

6.2.3 Asphalt or Concrete Paving with similar scope.

Table 4: “Example” Chart for Factor 2 Showing Specific Minimum Experience for Each Project:

Submitted Projects:

Demolition of ex. bldgs. containing hazmat and requiring abatement

Underground Utility construction or relocation

Asphalt or Concrete Paving

1 X X 2 X 3 X 4 X

Additionally, submit at least one representative photo or drawing with labels or marking of the document noting the especially relevant areas above.

Offeror must use Attachment 1, Offeror or Key Subcontractor Experience Form. Use one form for each project.

Offeror should describe each project with enough detail to ensure that the Government can meaningfully assess whether the project(s) submitted were recent and relevant to this project. Indefinite-Delivery, Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Contracts, where numerous Task Orders are summed up to meet the minimum construction dollar value identified herein, are not acceptable.

If the submitted project(s) were not self-performed by the Prime contractor, the Offeror must submit a “Letter of Commitment” for the Key Subcontractor(s) which will be completing work for this proposed project. (Please use Attachment 2 found at the end of this Section 00 22 00). Note: This is a requirement.

Any substitution of Key Subcontractor(s) after contract award will be subject to the approval of the Contracting Officer and must have qualifications and experience equal to or greater than those of the proposed Sub- Contractor(s).

6.3 Evaluation Method for Factor 2:

The Government reserves the right to verify the experience record of submitted projects by reviewing the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) and Past Performance Information Retrieval system (PPIRS), when available.

Table 5 will be used to evaluate Factor 2:

Table 5: Technical Acceptable/Unacceptable Rating Method Rating: Description:

Acceptable: Proposal meets the requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable: Proposal does not meet the requirements of the solicitation.

A rating of Acceptable will be given if all the criteria for Factor 2 are met.

A rating of Unacceptable will be given if any of the criteria for Factor 2 is not met.

7.0 FACTOR 3 (Volume 1, Tab C) – Past Performance of Offeror:

7.1 Submission Requirements for Factor 3:

The past performance evaluation is an assessment of the Offeror’s probability of meeting the minimum RFP requirements. This assessment is based on the Offeror’s record of relevant and recent past performance information that pertains to the scope of work as outlined in the RFP requirements.

Each Offeror’s past performance will be evaluated to determine whether the Offeror’s past performance is recent, and relevant or not relevant to the RFP, for each project submitted under Factors 1 and 2 (no more than seven

(7) projects). Recent and relevant projects for the purposes of the past performance evaluation are those projects completed within the past six (6) years from the RFP issue date featuring work which is similar in scope, magnitude, and complexity to what is required in the RFP. Next, the past performance will be evaluated to determine how well the Offeror performed on the prior contracts. If the proposal is from a Joint Venture or Partnership, Past Performance information for each partner will be reviewed.

At a minimum, the Government will review past performance information from the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) and Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), when available.

NOTE: If a CPARS rating is not available for ALL projects submitted under Factors 1 and 2, Offerors are strongly urged to submit a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) for those project(s) completed within the past six (6) years.

An Offeror should not submit a PPQ when a completed CPARS evaluation is available. If both are submitted, only the CPARS will be evaluated. If the Offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the Offeror should complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ (Attachment 3), which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s).

If the client requests, PPQs may be submitted directly to the Government's point of contacts, John Scola, via email at John.P.Scola@usace.army.mil and Caroline Mueller at caroline.b.mueller@usace.army.mil prior to the proposal closing date and time. The Offeror shall instruct the clients to refer to the RFP number in the subject line.

The PPQs are Source Selection materials. All successfully submitted PPQs will receive an email confirmation upon receipt. If the Offeror does not receive the confirmation, it is its responsibility to follow up to ensure the Government has received the information before the due date of your proposal.

Additional sources of Past Performance information for evaluation include, but are not limited to, the following:

Offeror may submit past performance information using the attached Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) for projects completed within six (6) years submitted under Factors 1 and 2.

The Government may obtain past performance information from other established systems such as the Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS) or other databases; as well as from other sources available to the Government, such as the Defense Contract Management Agency; and interviews with Government personnel with personal knowledge of the Offeror’s performance capability, interviews with organizations familiar with the Offeror’s performance, among others.

While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the Offeror. Offeror may provide explanation on problems encountered on past projects and the corrective actions taken by the Offeror.

6.2 Rating Method and Standard for Factor 3 – Past Performance of Offeror.

Table 6 will be used to evaluate Factor3:

Note: In the case of an Offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the Offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance. Therefore, the Offeror shall be determined to have unknown (or “neutral”) past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, a neutral rating shall be considered acceptable.

7.0 PRICE:

Price Evaluation:

Award will be made to the Offeror who present the Acceptable proposal (Factors 1, 2 and 3) with the overall total lowest price. The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by totaling all line items of the Bid/Price Schedule.

This Source Selection is conducted with the expectation of adequate price competition – normally competition establishes price reasonableness and a comparison of proposed prices will satisfy the requirement to perform a price analysis. A price reasonableness approach will be utilized by the Government to determine that the proposed prices are fair and reasonable as described in FAR 15.305(a)(1).

All offers with separately priced line items or sub-line items will be analyzed to determine if the prices are unbalanced (FAR 15.404-1(g)). The Government may determine that a proposal is unacceptable if the prices proposed are materially unbalanced between line items and/or sub-line items. Unbalanced pricing exists when, despite an acceptable total evaluated price, the price of one or more contract line items is significantly overstated

Table 6: Past Performance Acceptable/Unacceptable Rating Method Rating: Description:

Acceptable Based on the Offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the Offeror’s performance record is unknown. (See Note below)

Unacceptable Based on the Offeror’s performance record, the Government does not have a reasonable expectation that the Offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

or understated as indicated by the application of cost or price analysis techniques. A proposal may be rejected if the Contracting Officer determines that the lack of balance poses an unacceptable risk to the Government.

SECTION 00 22 00 - ATTACHMENT 1

OFFEROR or KEY SUBCONTRACTOR EXPERIENCE FORM

PLEASE USE THIS FORM PER SUBMITTED PROJECT

Factor 1 – Relevant Experience of Offeror Factor 2 – Relevant Experience of Team

Note: A separate Word version of this document will be accessible on SAM.gov

Provide the following information to show examples of projects your company constructed within the last six (6) years indicating experience with recent and relevant projects.

1. Name of Offeror (Or Key Subcontractor):

2. Project Title:

3. Contract/Project Number:

4. Project Owner and Location:

5. Total Contract Value: $

(Final value)

6. If submitting project performed by a JV, provide the DUNS number, unique entity identifier from SAM.gov and

Cage Code for each member:

7. Offeror acting as Subcontractor or performed as Key Subcontractor (Yes or No)

8. If Offeror performed as Subcontractor, the $-value of Subcontract: $

9. Construction Phase Start Date (Month/Day/Year):

10. Original Construction Phase Completion Date (Month/Day/Year):

11. Actual Construction Phase Completion Date (Month/Day/Year):

12. Name of Owner/Client POC:

13. Telephone Number of Owner/Client POC:

14. Email Address of Owner/Client POC:

15. General Scope of Construction Project:

ATTACHMENT 1 CONTINUED:

16. Describe/demonstrate how the project is relevant to the RFP in the following areas, as defined in Factor 1 and/or 2:

(a) Complexity:

(b) Magnitude/Cost:

(c) Scope:

17. Describe your role and responsibility during construction of the project (indicate whether your firm performed as a prime or subcontractor and what percentage of work you self-performed and/or type of work you subcontracted out, if applicable).

18. Summarize the performance evaluation by Customer/Client, if known:

19. Were you issued a Cure Notice, Show Cause Letter, Terminated for Default and/or Assessed Liquidated Damages? (If “Yes” provide an explanation):

20. Submit at least one representative photo or drawing with labels or marking of the document noting the especially relevant areas (Factor 2 only).

SECTION 00 22 00 – ATTACHMENT 2

LETTER OF COMMITMENT FOR KEY SUBCONTRACTOR

(USE COMPANY LETTERHEAD)

TO: Contracting Officer

SUBJECT: Letter of Commitment for Proposed Contract for

Dear Sir or Madam:

I hereby make the unequivocal commitment that, in the event of an award of a contract to (Fill in name of Prime), that (insert name of subcontractor) will fulfill the duties of (state role on a project).

Sincerely, (Authorized Official of Prime)

Date:

(Authorized Official of Subprime)

Date:

SECTION 00 22 00 – ATTACHMENT 3

THE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)

NAVFAC/USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ-0)

CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)

1. Contractor Information Firm Name: CAGE Code:

Address: DUNs Number:

Phone Number: unique entity identifier from SAM.gov:

Email Address:

Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:

2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain) Percent of project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):

3. Contract Information Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please specify):

Contract Title:

Contract Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Explain Differences:

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):

Explain Differences:

4. Project Description:

Complexity of Work High Med Routine How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, or other)

CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)

5. Client Information Name:

Title:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

6. Describe the client’s role in the project:

7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):

8. Client’s Signature:

NOTE: CLIENTS ARE HIGHLY ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT QUESTIONNAIRES DIRECTLY TO THE

OFFEROR. HOWEVER, QUESTIONNAIRES MAY BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO USACE. THE

GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO VERIFY ANY AND ALL INFORMATION ON THIS

FORM.

ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT YOUR EVALUATION OF THE

CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE

RATING DEFINITION NOTE

(E) Exceptional

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor was highly effective.

An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

(VG) Very Good

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.

(S) Satisfactory

Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory.

A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the Contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that Contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.

(M) Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The Contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the Contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.

(U) Unsatisfactory

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the Contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the Contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.

(N) Not Applicable

No information or did not apply to your contract

Rating will be neither positive nor negative.

Contractor Information (Firm Name): ________________________________________________

Client Information (Name): ________________________________________________________

TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT:

PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.

1. QUALITY:

a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts E VG S M U N

b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance E VG S M U N

c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance

E VG S M U N

d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance)

E VG S M U N

2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below)

E VG S M U N

b) Rate the Contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract

E VG S M U N

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project? E VG S M U N

b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes;

responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication)

E VG S M U N

c) To what extent was the Contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer?

E VG S M U N

d) Overall customer satisfaction E VG S M U N

4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR

a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force?

E VG S M U N

b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort E VG S M U N

c) Government Property Control E VG S M U N

d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by Contractor personnel E VG S M U N

e) Utilization of Small Business concerns E VG S M U N

f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines E VG S M U N

g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes

E VG S M U N

h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)

E VG S M U N

5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)?

E VG S M U N

Contractor Information (Firm Name): ________________________________________________ Client Information (Name): ________________________________________________________

b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client

E VG S M U N

c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns)

E VG S M U N

d) Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section.

Yes No

e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.

Yes No

f) Have there been any indications that the Contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below.

Yes No

6. SAFETY/SECURITY

a) To what extent was the Contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues? (Includes:

following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies).

E VG S M U N

b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements.

E VG S M U N

7. GENERAL

a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues).

E VG S M U N

b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues) E VG S M U N

c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below) Yes No

d) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this Contractor.

E VG S M U N

Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks. Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary):

ATTACHMENT 3 - RETURN INFORMATION:

It is preferred that your questionnaire be returned to the Offeror. However, you may also send your completed questionnaire directly to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers by email to both John Scola at john.p.scola@usace.army.mil and Caroline Mueller at caroline.b.mueller@usace.army.mil

End of Section 00 22 00

SECTION 00 72 00 - GENERAL CONDITIONS

The following have been modified:

52.211-10 COMMENCEMENT, PROSECUTION, AND COMPLETION OF WORK (APR 1984)

The Contractor shall be required to (a) commence work under this contract within 10 calendar days after the date the Contractor receives the notice to proceed, (b) prosecute the work diligently, and (c) complete the entire work ready for use not later than 547 calendar days after date of receipt by Contractor of Notice to Proceed. The time stated for completion shall include final cleanup of the premises.

(End of clause)

SECTION 00 73 00 - SUPPLEMENTARY CONDITIONS

ATTACHMENT 00 72 00-A

INDEX OF DRAWINGS

DATED 04.14.2022

SHEET

NUMBER

PLATE

TITLE

REVISION

DATE

GENERAL INFORMATION

1 GI002 COVER SHEET / INDEX TO DRAWINGS

2 G200 CODE SUMMARY

3 G201 LIFE SAFETY SITE PLAN

CIVIL

4 CI001 NOTES

5 CI002 SITE DIAGRAM AND KEY PLAN

6 CI004 CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING

7 CI005 CONSTRUCTION ACCESS DIAGRAM

8 CI006 ON-SITE SPOIL / BORROW AREA

9 CD101 TESC / DEMOLITION PLAN

10 CD102 TESC / DEMOLITION PLAN

11 CD103 TESC / DEMOLITION PLAN R0004 4/20/2022

12 CD104 TESC / DEMOLITION PLAN R0004 4/20/2022

13 CD105 TESC / DEMOLITION PLAN R0004 4/20/2022

14 CG101 GRADING PLAN

15 CG102 GRADING PLAN

16 CG103 GRADING PLAN

17 CG104 GRADING PLAN

18 CG105 GRADING PLAN

19 CP101 PAVING PLAN R0004 4/20/2022

20 CP102 PAVING PLAN R0004 4/20/2022

21 CP103 PAVING PLAN R0004 4/20/2022

22 CP104 PAVING PLAN R0004 4/20/2022

23 CP105 PAVING PLAN R0004 4/20/2022

24 CU101 UTILITY PLAN R0002 4/11/2022

25 CU102 UTILITY PLAN R0002 4/11/2022

26 CU103 UTILITY PLAN R0002 4/11/2022

27 CU104 UTILITY PLAN R0002 4/11/2022

W912DW22R0004 R0004

SHEET

NUMBER

28 CU105 UTILITY PLAN R0002 4/11/2022

CIVIL (continued)

29 CP201 ROAD PROFILES

30 CP202 ROAD PROFILES

31 CU201 STORM AND SANITARY PROFILES R0002 4/11/2022

32 CU202 STORM AND SANITARY PROFILES

33 CD501 TESC DETAILS

34 CP501 PAVING DETAILS

35 CP502 PAVING DETAILS

36 CU501 UTILITY DETAILS R0004 4/20/2022

37 CU502 UTILITY DETAILS

LANDSCAPE

38 L001 LANDSCAPE KEY PLAN

39 LT101 LANDSCAPE TREE PROTECTION PLAN

NORTH

40 LT102 LANDSCAPE TREE PROTECTION PLAN

SOUTH

41 LT103 LANDSCAPE TREE PROTECTION PLAN

LIST & DETAILS

42 L103 LANDSCAPE MATERIALS PLAN

43 L104 LANDSCAPE MATERIALS PLAN

44 L103.1 LANDSCAPE LAYOUT PLAN

45 L104.1 LANDSCAPE LAYOUT PLAN

46 L210 LANDSCAPE DETAILS

47 LI101 LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION PLAN

48 LI102 LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION PLAN

49 LI103 LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION PLAN

50 LI104 LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION PLAN

51 LI210 IRRIGATION DETAILS

52 LP101 LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN

53 LP102 LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN

54 LP103 LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN

W912DW22R0004 R0004

SHEET

NUMBER

LANDSCAPE (continued)

55 LP104 LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN

56 LP210 PLANTING DETAILS

MECHANICAL - HVAC

57 MS001 MECHANICAL LEGEND, NOTES, AND

ABBREVIATIONS

58 MS101 MECHANICAL SITE PLAN R0003 4/14/2022

59 MS102 MECHANICAL SITE PLAN

60 MS501 MECHANICAL DETAILS R0003 4/14/2022

61 MS502 MECHANICAL DETAILS

62 MS601 MECHANICAL SCHEDULES AND ALARM

MONITORING

R0003 4/14/2022

ELECTRICAL - GENERAL

63 E001 ELECTRICAL LEGEND AND

ABBREVIATIONS

ELECTRICAL – DEMOLITION PLANS

64 ED101 ELECTRICAL DEMOLITION SITE PLAN

65 ED102 ELECTRICAL DEMOLITION SITE PLAN

66 ED103 TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEMOLITION SITE

PLAN

R0004 4/20/2022

ELECTRICAL – SITE

67 ES101 ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN

68 ES102 ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN R0004 4/20/2022

ELECTRICAL – LIGHTING

69 EL502 LIGHTING DETAILS

70 EL601 LIGHTING FIXTURE SCHEDULE

ELECTRICAL – POWER

71 EP401 POWER ENLARGED PLANS

72 EP501 POWER DETAILS

73 EP602 POWER EXISTING CAMPUS ONE-LINE

DIAGRAM

74 EP603 POWER EXISTING PARTIAL ONE-LINE

DIAGRAMS

75 EP604 ELECTRICAL PANEL SCHEDULES

W912DW22R0004 R0004

SHEET

NUMBER

ELECTRICAL – TELECOMMUNICATIONS

76 ET101 PARTIAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS SITE

PLAN

R0003 4/14/2022

77 ET102 PARTIAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS SITE

PLAN

R0003 4/14/2022

78 ET103 PARTIAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS SITE

79 ET104 PARTIAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS SITE

80 ET105 TELECOMMUNICATIONS PRIMARY AND

SECONDARY BACKBONE PATHWAYS

81 ET106 TELECOMMUNICATIONS PRIMARY AND

SECONDARY BACKBONE PATHWAYS

82 ET107 PARTIAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS SITE

83 ET401 TELECOMMUNICATIONS PLAN

BUILDING 199 PARTIAL LEVEL 1

84 ET402 TELECOMMUNICATIONS PLAN

BUILDING 81 PARTIAL BASEMENT

85 ET601 VIDEO SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM DETAILS

86 ET602 EMERGENCY CALL SYSTEM DETAILS

87 ET603 COPPER BACKBONE CABLING DIAGRAMS

88 ET604 PUBLIC ADDRESS AND MASS

NOTIFICATION CABLING DIAGRAMS

End of Attachment 00 72 00-A

(End of Summary of Changes)