W912DW19Q0015_SITE_VISIT_MAP_AND__PPQ.pdf
PDF 932 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W912DW
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire related to a federal solicitation for grounds maintenance services at Chief Joseph Dam in Bridgeport, Washington. The solicitation is identified as number W912DW and seeks grounds maintenance at Chief Joseph Dam to be performed under a one-year contract with four one-year option periods. The site visit map and directions provided give location details for Chief Joseph Dam and instruct offerors to inspect the site and familiarize themselves with contract requirements and local conditions. The past performance questionnaire is to be completed by clients of the offeror to assess performance on previous similar contracts and includes ratings in various categories as well as space for comments.
W912DW19Q0015 SITE VISIT MAP AND DIRECTIONS AND PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
g3odcajs Line g3odcajs Line g3odcajs Line g3odcajs Line g3odcajs Line g3odcajs Line g3odcajs Line g3odcajs Line g3odcajs Line g3odcajs Rectangle g3odcajs Typewritten Text Administration Building g3odcajs Typewritten Text Parking g3odcajs Typewritten Text Overflow Parking g3odcajs Typewritten Text Highway 17 g3odcajs Typewritten Text Pearl Hill Rd g3odcajs Typewritten Text Hayden Rd g3odcajs Line g3odcajs Typewritten Text Chief Joseph Dam Administration: Hayden Rd, Bridgeport, WA 98813-1120
DIRECTIONS:
Directions to the Chief Joseph Dam Administration Building: Hayden Rd, Bridgeport, WA 98813-
From Wenatchee: Drive east on US Highway 2 for 13 miles, and then north on US Highway 97 for 57 miles. Turn right (east) on Washington Highway 17 for 8 miles until you see Chief Joseph Dam. Turn left onto Pearl Hill Rd and right onto Hayden R, the Administration Building is at the top of the hill.
From Spokane: Drive west on US Highway 2 for 97 miles until you arrive at Washington Highway 17 past Coulee City. (Note: Washington Highway 17 joins US Highway 2 for two miles before turning north.) Follow Washington Highway 17 north for 40 miles until you reach Bridgeport. Turn right onto Pearl Hill Rd and right onto Hayden R, the Administration Building is at the top of the hill. (See also Attachment No. 5 – Site Visit Map)
Quoters are urged to inspect the site where janitorial services are to be performed and to satisfy themselves as to the general and local conditions which may affect the price of performance of the contract, to the extent such information is reasonably obtainable Attendance at the site-visit or pre-bid conference is not mandatory.
FACTOR 3 FORM
NAVFAC PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ-0)
CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)
1. Contractor Information:
Firm Name:
Address:
Phone Number:
Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:
2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain)
Percent of project work performed:
If subcontractor, who was prime (Name/Phone #):
3. Contract Information
Contract Number:
Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):
Title:
Location:
Award Date (mm/dd/yy):
Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):
Award Amount:
Final Price:
4. Project Description:
CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)
5. Client Information
Name:
Title:
Phone Number:
Email Address:
6. Describe the client’s role in the project:
7. Date Questionnaire was completed:
8. Client’s Signature:
NOTE: THE CONTRACTOR MAY COLLECT AND RETAIN COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRES FROM CLIENTS
FOR SUBMITTAL TO THE GOVERNMENT. AFTER COMPLETION OF THIS FORM, THIS FORM MAY BE
DUPLICATED BY THE CONTRACTOR. THE GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO VERIFY ANY AND ALL
INFORMATION.
TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT
ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT
YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE
E (EXCELLENT) – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds the Client’s/Government’s expectations. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
V (VERY GOOD) – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some of the Client’s/Government’s expectations. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
S (SATISFACTORY) – Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element contains some minor problems for which corrective action taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
M (MARGINAL) –Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
U (UNSATISFACTORY) – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and/or recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
N (NOT APPLICABLE) – No past performance record is identifiable or the element is not applicable to this project.
PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS
YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.
1. Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance. E V S M U N
2. Compliance with contractual terms and conditions. E V S M U N
3. Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones.
E V S M U N
4. Quality/integrity of technical data/report preparation efforts.
E V S M U N
5. Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements.
E V S M U N
6. Effectiveness of overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program).
E V S M U N
7. Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors?
E V S M U N
8. Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes; responsiveness to administrative reports).
E V S M U N
9. Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance.
E V S M U N
10. Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations.
E V S M U N
11. Effectiveness of material management. E V S M U N
12. Effectiveness of acquisition management. E V S M U N
13. Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client.
E V S M U N
14. Contractor’s management of their safety program. E V S M U N
15. Responsiveness regarding safety issues. E V S M U N
16. If this was a cost type contract, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (underruns or overruns).
E V S M U N
17. If this is/was a Government cost type contract, the Contractor’s timeliness in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation and monthly status reports/budget variance reports.
E V S M U N
18. If this is/was a Government cost type contract, the Contractor’s accuracy regarding monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation and monthly status reports/budget variance reports.
E V S M U N
19. Ability to hire/apply a qualified workforce to this effort.
E V S M U N
20. Ability to retain a qualified workforce on this effort E V S M U N
21. If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.
Yes No
22. Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problem? If yes, please explain below.
Yes No
23. In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor.
E V S M U N
Any additional comments related to the contractor’s performance:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .