W912DS-11-R-0019 Amend 04.pdf

W16ROE11827733

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this Amendment is to:

1. Make changes to the Specifications, including reissuing the entire Price Schedule.

2. Make changes to the Plans.

3. Respond to contractors' questions (FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY).

The due date of 12 September 2011 for submission of proposals is extended to 13 September 2011 no later than 2:00 p.m. EST.

NOTE: Offerors must acknow ledge receipt of this amendment by the date specified in the proposal (or as amended) by one of the follow ing methods: In the space provided on the SF 1442, by separate letter, by telegram, or by signing block 15 below . FAILURE TO ACKNOWLEDGE AMENDMENT BY THE DATE AND TIME SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR PROPOSAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATE PROPOSAL, LATE MODIFICATION OF PROPOSAL, OR LATE WITHDRAWAL OF PROPOSAL (FAR 15.208).

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 35

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 07-Sep-2011

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W912DS-11-R-0019

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

09-Aug-2011

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES T HE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. T HIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT T O: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJEC3T NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

07-Sep-2011

CODE

US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, NEW YORK

26 FEDERAL PLAZA, RM 1843

NEW YORK NY 10278-0090

W912DS 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W912DS-11-R-0019

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION 00010 - SOLICITATION CONTRACT FORM

The required response date/time has changed from 12-Sep-2011 02:00 PM to 13-Sep-2011 02:00 PM.

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

0001 1 Lump Sum All work Associated with Station #4

FFP

FOB: Destination

MILSTRIP: W16ROE11827733

PURCHASE REQUEST NUMBER: W16ROE11827733

NET AMT

0002 1 Lump Sum All work Associated with Station #1

FFP

FOB: Destination

0003 1 Lump Sum Spur Road

FFP

All work Associated with Spur Road connecting Camp Shea Road to Stations #4 and #5 Access Road (from road station 0+00 to 5+00)

0004 1 Lump Sum Access Road

FFP

All work Associated with the access road from Stations #4 and #5 to the main road

0005 1 Lump Sum All work Associated with Station #2

0006 1 Lump Sum All work Associated with Station #3

0007 1 Lump Sum All work Associated with Station #5

0008 1 Lump Sum All work Associated the Ops/Storage Bldg

0009 1 Lump Sum All work Associated with the Ammo

FFP

Breakdown pad

0010 1 Lump Sum Wayents Pond Road

FFP

All site work associated with the Ops/Storage, Ammo Breakdown pad, and the Stations #1 and #2 including the access road to Wayents Pond Road and Storm water detention basin #4

0011 1 Lump Sum All work Associated with the Access Road

FFP

Connecting Stations #1 and #2 and the Ops Storage Building to Station #3 (from station 00 to 1060), including depressions associated with culverts C5 and C6

0012 1 Lump Sum All work Associated with the main Road

FFP

Connecting the access road to Stations #4 and #5 to Station #3 (from station 1060 to 2166), including depressions associated with culverts C3 and C4

0013 1 Lump Sum All work associated with Site work

FFP

Around Station #4 and Station #5 including storm water detention basin #2

0014 1 Lump Sum Power Telecom

FFP

All work associated with the power telecom transmission lines

The following have been modified:

TOTALS

TOTAL (CLINs 0001 to 0014) $____________________________

SECTION 00800 - SPECIAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 0004

Amendment #4, W912DS-11-R-0019, URBAN ASSAULT COURSE, at USAG at West Point, NY

The purpose of this amendment is the change the plans and specifications and address perspective contractor questions.

The following specification sections are to be deleted in their entirety:

32 12 17 Hot Mix Bituminous Pavement The following specifications are new and issued with this amendment:

07 41 14.00 18 03 41 16

The following specifications are revised but are not re-issued:

In section 00 80 00 replace the second sentence in paragraph 12a with the following: “The project identification sign, which will identify the work with the Corps of Engineers, shall be 4 feet by 6 feet in size and shall conform to the requirements of the PROJECT SIGN drawing and installation instructions attached at the end of this section.”

In Section 00 80 00 delete paragraphs 34 and 35.

In Section 00 80 00 delete paragraph 36.

In Section 01 45 04.00 replace the last sentence in paragraph 3.4.2 with the following: “The CQC System Manager shall be assigned no duties other than Quality Control or Site Safety and Health Officer”

In Section 07 42 13 paragraph 1.3 shall be revised as follows:

“1.3 DESCRIPTION OF WALL PANEL SYSTEM

GALVANIZED STEEL SHEET METAL WALL PANEL SYSTEM WITH EXPOSED FASTENER.

PANEL PROFILE MUST BE STANDING SEAM.

1. PROFILE AND COVERAGE TO BE A MINIMUM HEIGHT AND WIDTH FROM

MANUFACTURER'S STANDARD FOR THE INDICATED WALL AREA.”

In Section 07 42 13 replace paragraph 1.8.1 with the following: “PROVIDE 10

YEARS STANDARD WEATHERTIGHT WARRANTY AND 20 YEARS FINISH WARRANTY.”

In Section 07 42 13 replace paragraph 2.2 with the following:

“2.2.2 STEEL SHEET

GALVANIZED STEEL SHEET CONFORMING TO ASTM A653/A653MAND AISI SG03-3.

1. PROFILE AND COVERAGE TO BE A MINIMUM HEIGHT AND WIDTH FROM

MANUFACTURER'S STANDARD FOR THE INDICATED WALL AREA.”

In Section 07 61 14 replace paragraph 1.7 with the following: “PROVIDE 10 YEARS

STANDARD WEATHERTIGHT WARRANTY AND 20 YEARS FINISH WARRANTY.”

In Section 08 51 13 Delete paragraph 2.6.

Section 13 34 19 Delete paragraph 2.8.3.2.

The following plan sheets are revised and re-issued with this amendment:

G-003 E-111 E-503

ES-104

CE-101

CE-102

CE-103

CE-104

CE-106

CE-107

CG-104

CG-106

CG-108

CS-104

The following plan sheets are revised but are not re-issued with this amendment:

In drawing A-101 delete the note in the legend requiring a sign for the attic space.

In drawing A-102 delete Wall System Panels note.

In drawing A-102, add the following note: “insulated Metal Panel U=0.05 SYS

(TYP), except to the ammo facilty.”

In drawing A-103 delete reference to section D/A-203.

In drawing A-202 delete the building height dimension of 10’-0”.

In drawing A-104 add the following note: “FIRST FLOOR PLAN IS IDENTICAL TO THE

2ND FLOOR PLAN”

In drawing A-106 delete note referencing the Underground Trainer.

In drawing A-205 detail 3 delete reference to Detail 1/A-504 In drawing A-501 detail E replace the title of the detail with the following:

“TYPICAL ROOFING SYSTEM”

In drawing A-603 delete reference to steel frame for window type B.

In drawing M-101 delete the two wall openings.

In drawing S-502 delete notes in section 1, 2 and 4 referring to 12”X12” and 24”X24”.

In drawing A-501 replace the title of detail ‘E’ with “Cementitious Concrete Roofing System”.

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS:

Question No. 1: 00 80 00 para. 34 & 35; Please confirm that this is not a Design & Build contract, and these paragraphs are not applicable.

Answer No. 1: This is not a design/build project. Those paragraphs are deleted with this amendment.

Question No. 2: Appendices: Please confirm that the following appendices are provided for reference only:

- Appendix A Design Summary,

- Appendix B Water Quality,

- Appendix C Outlet Protection Design and

- Appendix D Pondpack and Flow Master calculating data worksheets, Answer No. 2: Yes, these appendices are FOR INFORMATION ONLY. They act as supporting documents to the stormwater design analysis.

Question No. 3: Section 01 35 26 para. 1.5.1.1 mentions that the CQC person can also be the Site Safety and Health Officer, but sec. 014504.00 para. 3.4.2 last sentence mentions that CQC Mgr. shall have no other duties. Which one governs?

Answer No. 3: Section 01 35 26 is correct. Section 01 45 04 is revised with this amendment.

Question No. 4: 01 57 23 para. 1.4: SD-01 Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan is already prepared and included in sec. 00901. Please advise if additional data is required.

Answer No. 4: No additional data is required for SWPP. Additional data will be provided to the approving agency if requested.

Question No. 5: Section 07 42 13, para. 1.3: Provide panel profile that “must be as shown on drawings” (none shown on drawings).

Answer No. 5: Paragraph revised with this amendment.

Question No. 6: Section 07 42 13 para1.8.1: Metal wall panel mfr’s do not provide 20 year No Dollar Limit Warranty. They only provide 20 year finish warranty.

Answer No. 6: Paragraph revised with this amendment.

Question No. 7: Section 07 42 13 para. 2.2 mentions different panel materials i.e.;

aluminum, galvanized steel, aluminum-zinc alloy steel, etc. Please provide wall panel material, size, thickness and profile information applicable to this project.

Answer No. 7: Paragraph revised with this amendment.

Question No. 8: Section 07 61 14.00 para. 1.7; Metal roof panel manufacturer’s do not provide 20 year No Dollar Limit Warranty, they only furnish 20 year finish warranty.

Answer No. 8: Paragraph revised with this amendment.

Question No. 9: Section 08 11 13 para 2.3: Specify number of breachings required.

Answer No. 9: REFER TO DWG A-103 –DOOR SCHEDULE No OF BREACHING DOORS = 3.

Question No. 10: Section 08 51 13: Specification require blast resistant aluminum windows with laminated glass. However, drawings show standard aluminum secured to simple construction, and with polycarbonate glazing. Please verify blast resistant requirement.

Answer No. 10: We are not requiring blast resistant windows.

Question No. 11: Section 08 51 13, para. 2.6: Are window cleaner’s bolts indeed required for this project?

Answer No. 11: NO. Section is revised with this amendment.

Question No. 12: Section 13 34 19, pages 21 & 22, para. 2.4 Panel Materials list different roof and wall panels: 2.4.1 aluminum sheet, 2.4.2 steel sheet, 2.4.3 foam insulation, 2.4.4 insulated panel construction. Which material is applicable for this RFP? Also, each indicate liner panel, none on the drawings. Please provide correct material type, thickness, size, profile, finish and composition for each building.

Answer No. 12:

PANEL MATERIALS LIST IS OF DIFFERENT ROOF PANELS:

- INSULATED METAL PANELS FOR CONTROL ROOM FACILITY – DWG A-105a

- STEEL WALL METAL PANELS FOR THE STORAGE BUILDING. – DWG A-101

- NO LINER PANEL

Question No. 13: Section 13 34 19 para. 2.8.7: Clarify which roof and wall accessories included, as drawings show none.

Answer No. 13:

FOR THE ROOF PANELS:

- STANDING SEAM (STEEL) METAL PANELS FOR AMMO BLDG, STORAGE BLDG.

- CORRUGATED ROOF PANELS FOR STATION # 2, BUILDING A

ALSO WALL ACCESSORIES ARE IN THE SPECS.

Question No. 14: Section 13 34 19 para. 2.8.3.2: Drawings do not show wall liner.

Answer No. 14: Specifications are revised in this amendment.

Question No. 15: Drawings CS-103,104 & 107: Please confirm road marked as “Main Road” (gravel) is the “Spur” mentioned road in Price Schedule Items #0003 and #0004.

Answer No. 15: Wording of the price schedule is revised with this amendment.

Question No. 16: Price Schedule Item #0003: Clearly identity limit if work, as Spur Road in CS-104 continues after station 5.

Answer No. 16: Wording of the price schedule is revised with this amendment.

Question No. 17: Price Schedule Item #0010; What is the limit of work for “Access Road to Wayents Pond Road” on drawings CS101? Drawing shows gravel areas in a heavy line, and the gravel road between Operation/Storage Building and Ammo Breakdown Building is shown in lighter line? Please clarify.

Answer No. 17: Wording of the price schedule is revised with this amendment.

Question No. 18: Price Schedule Item #0011: Is the Access Road between Stations #1 and #2 marked as “Main Road” on drawings CS-101 and CS-102?

Answer No. 18: Wording of the price schedule is revised with this amendment.

Question No. 19: Dwg. SC-101 thru CS-107: Are the new “tree lines” in the contract? If so, please provide details of work.

Answer No. 19: See Spec Section 31 11 00, Clearing and Grubbing

Question No. 20: Dwg. CS-103: What do numbers 1 thru 30, next to structures represent?

Answer No. 20: Horizontal control points for targets. See Sheet CS-501.

Question No. 21: Dwg. CS-105: Is there a work in this drawing or is this just continuation of

CS-104 & CS-103?

Answer No. 21: Yes. The pipe gates are new.

Question No. 22: Dwg. CP-101 thru CP-107: Provide reference in plans related with these profiles.

Answer No. 22: In title block it indicates the name of the road. On plan view the roads are named.

Question No. 23: Dwg. CS-502: Advise if SIT and DSIT concrete emplacement can be either cast-in –place or precast concrete.

Answer No. 23: See General Note 2.

Question No. 24: Dwg. CS-104: What do numbers 1 thru 11 represent at Station #5?

Answer No. 24: The horizontal control points for the Underground Trainer which is Station 5 on the plans. See sheet CS-115.

Question No. 25: Dwg. CS-104: Infill pipe with concrete: Provide infill length.

Answer No. 25: 1 foot.

Question No. 26: Dwg. CS-105: Are pipe gates shown in this contract?

Answer No. 26: Yes.

Question No. 27: Dwg. S-102: Specify footing foundation depth, and confirm that there will be a precast coping over CMU wall (and no roof structure) per A-203.

Answer No. 27: Depth of footing: 2’ to top of footing; use a precast coping at top of wall.

Question No. 28: Dwg. S-103, Detail A: Provide missing dimensions (2 dimensions @ left side)

Answer No. 28: Depth of concrete 15”, Edge distance of anchor bolt 8”

Question No. 29: Dwg. S-104: Please provide specifications for Hollow Core Precast Concrete Slab.

Answer No. 29: Please see section 03 41 16, released with this amendment.

Question No. 30: S-104: Referenced Details 1/S-501, 2/S-501 and 3/S-501 are not related with Foundation and Basement Plan. Please confirm that details on S-502 to be applicable.

Answer No. 30: Change references on S-104 to read 1/S-502, 2/S-502 and 3/S-502.

Question No. 31: Dwg. S-104: Detail 8/S-507 referenced on First Floor Framing Plan does not exist.

Answer No. 31: Change Detail 8/S-507 to read 6/S-501.

Question No. 32: Dwg. S-105: Details 8/S-507 and 9/S-507 referenced on Second Floor Framing Plan do not exist.

Answer No. 32: Change Detail 8/S-507 to read 6/S-501. Change Detail 9/S-507 to read 7/S-501.

Question No. 33: Dwg. S-104 & S-105: HSS 4”4” columns are being shown at different locations on each floor. Since these are to be full height to roof, please verify locations.

Answer No. 33: Position as shown on First Floor

Question No. 34: Dwg. S-106: Referenced details on S-507 & S-508 are not applicable to High Roof Framing Plan.

Answer No. 34: The referenced details appear on DWG. S-504 and S-505.

Question No. 35: Dwg. S-201: Detail 2 shows 21” x 24” continuous concrete footing, but dimension next to footing shows 3’ -6”. Which one is correct?

Answer No. 35: Disregard 12”x12” and 24”x24”, reinforcing to be placed as indicated on drawings.

Question No. 36: Dwg. S-109: Station #2 Second Floor (Bldg. A) has a corrugated roof per A-104. Provide construction details and specs (roofing metal panel specifications do not apply to corrugated roofing). Also confirm that all other structures do not have roofing, and how are CMU bond beams are protected, shouldn’t there be a stone cap similar to Station #4 Offense/Defense Bldg?

Answer No. 36: Use Precast Concrete copings.

Question No. 37: Dwg. S-109: Provide construction/material details for second floor cantilevered balcony.

Answer No. 37: Extend 4” thick concrete floor on 1.5” deck to make balcony, support will be provided by timber posts.

Question No. 38: Dwg. S-201 & A-105: Please “Identify” composite sheating. Is OSB sheating acceptable?

Answer No. 38: OSB sheating is acceptable.

Question No. 39: Dwg. S-502: Is there any drainage pipe, waterproofing and protection board at exterior foundation walls?

Answer No. 39: No.

Question No. 40: Dwg. S-502, Detail 3: Provide referenced drawing S-012 for “balance of info” as noted.

Answer No. 40: Detail is on DWG S-202.

Question No. 41: Dwg. A-101: 1) Legend calls for metal soffit panels, but none shown on referenced details. Please confirm and provide details with gutters, if any. 2) Legend also shows a sign for attic space. There is no attic in this building.

Answer No. 41:

VENTED SOFFIT PANEL IS SHOWN IN DET. IN 3/A-A-205. FLOOR PLAN SHOWS THE 2’-0”

OVERHANG. NO GUTTERS AND DOWNSPOUTS IN THESE TRAINING FACILITIES. NOTE

MENTIONING ATTIC SPACE IS DELETED WITH THIS AMENDMENT.

Question No. 42: Dwg. A-102: General Notes require P.E. Design and calculation for insulated metal panel. There is no insulated panel on this building that has no walls.

Answer No. 42: Revised with this amendment.

Question No. 43: Dwg. A-103: Referenced section D/A-203 does not exist. Also how high is this building? Elevations on A-202 show both 8’-0” and 10’-0”.

Answer No. 43: These plan sheets are revised with this amendment.

Question No. 44: Dwg. A-104: Provide 1st floor plan and section thru Building A (plan shows 2nd floor for Bldg. A).

Answer No. 44: FIRST FLOOR PLAN IS IDENTICAL TO THE 2ND FLOOR PLAN. IT CONSISTS OF TWO WINDOWS AND ONE DOOR SAME LOCATION OF THE 2nd FLOOR.

Question No. 45: Dwg. A-105: Is the Grenadier Gunnery Trainer Bldg. in Station #3 (building marked as “Façade” on CS-103)?

Answer No. 45: THE UAC GRENADIER TRAINER IS KNOWN ALSO AS A “FAÇADE”, BECAUSE

THE FIRST PART OF THE BUILDING CONSISTS OF A WOODEN FAÇADE THAT DEPICTS A 2

STORY BLDG AND THE SECOND PART COSISTS OF THE TARGET ENGAGEMENT LANE.

Question No. 46: Dwg. A-105 Elevation A: Do we install Linatex “07” sheeting directly nailed over plywood siding, and do we have to cut for door and window openings?

Answer No. 46: YES.

Question No. 47: Dwg. A-106: “Underground Trainer” shown @ left side of plan is not shown on Civil Drawings. Provide plans and details, CS-106 & CG-106 do not have this info.

Answer No. 47: Revised with this amendment.

Question No. 48: . A-107: Provide size and specs for Tire Door/ Window bumper.

Answer No. 48: SIZE OF THE TIRE DOOR WINDOWS IS 6”X 2”X 4” WITH EYE BOLTS, SPECS IS

NOT NECESSARY FOR TIRE BUMPERS.

Question No. 49: Dwg. A-105a: Would insulated stud wall w/metal siding be acceptable (same as OPS/Storage building), in lieu of insulated metal panels?

Answer No. 49: NO, METAL INSULATED PANELS ARE REQUIRED.

Question No. 50: Dwg. A-201: Elevations show 2'-0" overhangs. Are there any soffit, gutters & downspouts? Also, elevations don not match with building sections on Dwg.

A-301, and Detail 1/A-504. Please clarify design & details.

Answer No. 50:

SOFFIT IS SHOWN IN THE FLOOR PLAN AND DETAIL 3/A-205.

NO GUTTERS AND DOWNSPOUTS, THESE ARE TRAINING BUILDINGS.

SECTION A-301 WILL BE ADDED THE SOFFIT TO MATCH THE ELEVATIONS.

Question No. 51: Dwg. A-201 Elevation C: Confirm there is no reinforced CMU walls.

Also, are windows to be blast resistant, or will PEMB’s standard aluminum windows with polycarbonate glazing be acceptable?

Answer No. 51:

NOT CMU FOR THE WALLS.

ALUMINUM WINDOWS WITH POLYCARBONATE GLAZING IS ACCEPTABLE.

Question No. 52: Dwg. A-204. Provide corrugated metal roof specs and installation details w/substrate.

Answer No. 52:

WILL BE INCLUDED IN THE AMENDMENT THE CORRUGATED METAL ROOF SPECS. DETAILS

INFORMATION WILL BE PROVIDED IN THE SPECS.

Question No. 53: Dwg. A-205, Detail 3: Referenced Detail 1/A-504 does not match to this detail. Confirm that soffit to be 2’-0” with manufacturers standard soffit panel and details. Also advise if there are any gutters and downspouts required.

Answer No. 53:

SOFFIT DIMENSION IS 2’-0” ACCORDING TO MANUFACTURER STANDARD SOFFIT.

NO GUTTERS AND DOWNSPOUT REQUIRED.

Detail 1/A-504 IS AT THE EAVE, NOT AT THE SOFFIT LOCATION. Incorrect detail reference is deleted with this amendment.

Question No. 54: Dwg. A-501 Detail E; Provide Elastomeric Roofing System Specifications to include all system components i.e.; roofing membrane, protection board, rigid insulation, drainage mat, etc. Section 07 13 53 is for elastomeric membrane applicable to foundation walls, not for roofing.

Answer No. 54: Revised with this amendment.

Question No. 55: . A-304. Please advise if pre-engineered truss system would be acceptable in lieu of site fabricated trusses.

Answer No. 55: Yes. Pre-engineered truss system is acceptable.

Question No. 56: Dwg. A-206. Confirm that all windows to receive precast sill as shown on A-304 & A-603.

Answer No. 56: THE PRECAST WINDOW SILL IS CORRECT; IN THE LOCATION SHOWN IN THE

ELEVATIONS AND FOR THIS FACILITY (ONLY).

Question No. 57: Dwg. A-503, Detail 1. Footing size shown (approx. 2’ x 4’) doesn’t match to 2’ x 2’ as shown on S-107 & S-201. Confirm S drawings shall govern.

Answer No. 57: DRAWINGS ARE GENERIC; STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS SHALL GOVERN FOR

THE FOUNDATION.

Question No. 58: Dwg. A-503. Would any other type of steel be acceptable in lieu of AR 500 steel?

Answer No. 58: NO.

Question No. 59: Dwg. A-601: Window details indicate wood framed walls, this is not applicable for the pre-engineered metal building.

Answer No. 59: NO, THESE DETAILS APPLY FOR THE OTHER FACILITIES.

Question No. 60: Dwg. A-601: Verify that all aluminum window details shown are NOT blast resistant construction.

Answer No. 60: WINDOWS ARE NOT BLAST RESISTANT CONSTRUCTION.

Question No. 61: Dwg. A-603. Please provide specifications for Window (Type B?), with steel frame and steel tube thickness, finish, etc.

Answer No. 61: THIS WINDOW WILL HAVE ALUMINUM FRAME, SAME AS THE REST OF THE

WINDOWS.

Question No. 62: Dwg. M-101: Storage Room shows 2 openings on wall (louvers?), those not shown on A-201 elevations. Provide size of these openings. Also advise A.F.F.

dimension of the PTHP’s.

Answer No. 62: Disregard the two openings shown on the Storage Room side of the Operations/Storage Building shown on Dwg. M-101.

Follow PTHP manufacturer's recommendations for A.F.F. dimensions.

Question No. 63: Dwg. M-501: Ventilation fan is not shown on Site/Civil and Structural drawings. This fan seems to be mounted on a manhole. Provide details and location of the manhole on site/Civil drawings.

Answer No. 63: Now shown. See revised sheets CS-104, CG-104, CE-104 and CS-115. Civil Dwg. CG-108 will be revised to show Catch Basin structure, which will accommodate the installation of the EF-2 exhaust fan. Dwg. M-501 will be revised to reflect these civil drawing changes.

Question No. 64: Dwg. P-101 shows 4” drain line, CG-106 & CE-106 show 6”. Which one is correct?

Answer No. 64: Have changed CG-106 and CE-106 to show 4" drain. 4 inch drain size is correct. Civil Dwgs. CG-106 & CE-106 are revised to show 4 inch drain size.

Question No. 65: T-501, Note 3 refers to E-504 for notes and component identifications.

However, this drawing does not exist. Please provide component identifications.

Answer No. 65: Drawing Sheet E-504 was issues in the original solicitation.

Question No. 66: Dwg. T-501. Advise if MTDP is government furnished or not. Please provide specifications if contractor furnished.

Answer No. 66: Dwg E-504 and T-501 provides for the exact specification for the MTDP equipment. The MTDP equipment is contractor furnished.

Question No. 67: I have not found a soils and boring report in my initial review of the documents. Does one exist?

Answer No. 67: Yes, one would be in the specifications.

Question No. 68: the terrain it will be very difficult to estimate rock quantities. Can unit prices be added to the proposal for mass and trench rock?

Answer No. 68: No, the project bid is lump sum, estimate the amount of rock and included in the lump sum price.

Question No. 69: I have not estimated the earthwork requirements as of yet, but given the location of this project, are borrow and/or disposal sites available if needed? This could reduce project costs considerably.

Answer No. 69: The Contractor would have to investigate and find the nearest borrow areas.

Question No. 70: Will a New York State sales tax exemption number be provided for all permanent and temporary materials incorporated/utilized on this project?

Answer No. 70: Permanent materials are tax exempt but temporary materials such as forms are not tax exempt.

Question No. 71: Liquidated damages: Solicitation pg 45 of 113 says LD’s are $845 per day. Page 58 of 113 says LD’s are $435 per day. Please clarify which LD rate will apply.

Answer No. 71: They both apply. The lower amount is referring to the tier 2 LDs for punchlist items.

Question No. 72: SWPPP – please reference Solicitation pg 72 and spec 01 57 23.1.3.2 which both reference that a SWPPP is to be provided by the contractor. Specification section 00901 includes a SWPPP for this project. Please clarify what is required from the contractor in terms of a project specific SWPPP and NOI.

Answer No. 72: SWPP was prepared as a part of the project submission. This SWPP acts as a supporting document for the stormwater analysis conducted for the proposed work. Contractor shall file the NOI and can use the necessary information from SWPP for NOI backup.

Question No. 73: section 01 35 26.1.5.1.1 says the SSHO can be the QC representative provided certain qualifications are met. Spec section 01 45 04.3.4.2 says “the CQC system manager shall be assigned no duties other than quality control”. Please clarify which reference will apply to this project.

Answer No. 73: Section 01 45 04 is revised with this amendment.

Question No. 74: excess or unsuitable excavated soils to be stockpiled and remain within the work limits or should the contractor include sampling, testing and disposal offsite?

Answer No. 74: The Contractor should bid on disposal of offsite for unsuitable excavated soils.

Question No. 75: Where new construction is to occur, are stones from ‘fallen walls’ to be stockpiled within the work area for future use by the Government?

Answer No. 75: No.

Question No. 76: dwg S-102: Foundation and Wall section 1 – what is the distance from the bottom of the footing to existing and finished grades?

Answer No. 76: Varies according to final grading. Ensure 9’-0” between bottom of footing and bottom of first floor slab.

Question No. 77: Spec section 00902 – Subsurface Investigation Report: based on the results of Test pits 19, 20 and 21 and dwgs. CS-106 and S-502, rock excavation appears to be required in order to build the Station 4 Off/Def bldg basement. Please consider providing a unit price bid item for Rock Excavation or an estimated quantity of rock for all bidders to carry in their lump sum bids.

Answer No. 77: Right now you have to bid on the amount of bedrock and include in the lump sum bid.

Question No. 78: Exhaust fan and MH 5 for Station 5 – The CS, CG, and CE dwgs for this station show 4 manholes. Dwgs M-501, ES-104 and E-111 show 5 manholes. Please clarify and provide additional civil details for any additional pipe and MH 5 if it is necessary.

Answer No. 78: CS,CG, and CE drawings have been revised to reflect structure.

Question No. 79: Dwg CE-104 & CE-106 – Please indicate the plan area limits of the Geomembrane required at DB2.

Answer No. 79: The limits of the geomembrane for detention basin DB2 remain unchanged. In order to avoid conflicts between the contour line and upper limit of geomembrane, only lower limit was shown on the plan. For further details, a new note 12 for CE104 and note 11 for CE106 has been added to sheet respectively.

Question No. 80: Dwgs CE-101 thru CE-107 – for the limits of the proposed silt fence, please change it from a solid line to a dashed line so a quantity can be accurately determined on the black and white set of plans.

Answer No. 80: Originally, the silt fence was shown with a line and text SF. This line type was lost while converting the drawing files from CAD to a pdf format. The pdf has been revised to reflect the line type.

Question No. 81: Dwg S-201 – section 1 indicates the concrete footing is 2’wx2’d.

Section 2 indicates the concrete footing is 2’w x 3’9”d. Please clarify which is required.

Answer No. 81: Footing dimensions are 2’-0” square 3’-6” deep.

Question No. 82: Dwg S-502 – 2” concrete topping slab reinforcing – Sections 1, 2, and 4 have notes that say 24”x24”, # 3 @ 16” o.c or 12”x12” # 3 @16”o.c. Please clarify what the 24”x24” or 12”x12” means.

Answer No. 82: Disregard 12”x12” and 24”x24”, reinforcing to be placed as indicated on drawings.

Question No. 83: In reviewing the specifications for the West Point Urban Assault project there does not appear to be a specification for the pre-cast plank that is shown for the Offense/Defense Building. Please be advised.

Answer No. 83: See attached Specs Section 03 41 16.

Question No. 84: At station #1 there are (2) windows (sheet A-202), I am unable to find any details that tells me whether this window is hollow metal or aluminum or the type of glazing. Could you please clarify?

Answer No. 84: ALUMINUM WINDOWS ARE SPECIFIED IN SPECIFICATION SECTION 08 51 13

AND GLAZING IS SPECIFIED IN SECTION 08 81 00.

Question No. 85: On the Grenadier Gunnery Trainer Structure there is a note to cover the wood siding in Linatex “oz” 12 mm thick UV light and ozone resistant coating. This does not appear to be listed in the specifications, could you please clarify as to what this product is?

Answer No. 85: LINA PLUS OZ IS A NATURAL RUBBER SHEET ESPECIALLY FORMULATED TO

WITHSTAND ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT.

Question No. 86: Will there be specific working hours for the project?

Answer No. 86: Hours outside a typical construction work day (such as a second shift or weekend work) may be arranged with the resident office.

Question No. 87: Please provide a copy of the sign-in sheet from the 8-25-11 Site Visit.

Answer No. 87: Provided with this amendment.

Question No. 88: With respect to the CLIN’s for this project, we request that the scope of work descriptions for the CLIN’s be revised for most of the CLIN’s in order to make it clearer to the bidders as to what work is to be included in the various lump sum items.

For example, it is not clear why some structures such as the Ops/Storage Building and Ammo Breakdown structure are paid separately, yet the Offense/Defense Building, which is the most complex structure on this project, is not covered by a separate pay item. We are concerned that the proposal, as it reads now, can be misinterpreted to imply that the Offense/Defense Building is not included in the bid proposal. In addition to this type of issue, some CLIN’s appear to include duplicative scopes of work. Other CLIN’s are not clear as to the extent to which site work is to be included, and on other CLIN’s that apply to the roads it would be much easier to follow if the roadway stationing were used to define the various portions of the roads that are to be allocated to the CLIN’s. The following questions address most of these issues as they relate to specific CLIN’s.

Answer No. 88: Offense/Defense building is also known as station #4 and is CLIN 001.

Price schedule revised in this amendment to be more clear.

Question No. 89: CLIN #0002 is described as “All work associated with Station #1”. Yet, CLIN #0008 and #0009 include the pricing for two of the structures that are located at Training Station #1. Therefore, it would be helpful if the description of CLIN #0002 were revised to identify the scope of work is to be included and to specifically exclude the work at Station #1 that is covered by other CLIN’s. A complete CLIN description should also address whether or not the Training Structure to be included or excluded from the

CLIN.

Answer No. 89: Station #1 is just the training station. It does not include any of the support facilities.

Question No. 90: CLIN #0005 is described as “All work associated with Station #2”. Yet, CLIN #0010 appears to include the site work associated with Training Station #2. Please clarify.

Answer No. 90: When a facility or structure is referenced it means all work for that structure up to 5 feet outside the facility. Site work is typically a different CLIN.

Question No. 91: With respect to CLIN’s #0003, 0004, 0011 and 0012 it would be much easier to understand the scope of work to be included in these CLIN’s if the roadway stationing were used to define the start and stop limits for each portion of the roads in these CLIN’s.

Answer No. 91: CLINs revised with this amendment.

Question No. 92: Please clarify CLIN #0010 and CLIN #0005 as it appears that they both include the sitework at Training Station #2.

Answer No. 92: CLINs revised with this amendment.

Question No. 93: With regard to CLIN #0008, which is described as including All work associated with the Ops/Storage Building, please clarify if this pay item is intended to include the entire Ops/Storage Building, including the foundation, HVAC, lighting, power and the lightning protection system, but excluding the sitework for this structure.

Answer No. 93: When a facility or structure is referenced it means all work for that structure up to 5 feet outside the facility. Site work is typically a different CLIN.

Question No. 94: With regard to CLIN #0009, which is described as including the Ammo Breakdown Pad, please clarify if this pay item is intended to include the entire Ammo Breakdown Building, including the foundation, lighting, power and the lightning protection system, but excluding the sitework for this structure.

Answer No. 94: When a facility or structure is referenced it means all work for that

Question No. 95: With regard to CLIN’s #0009 and #0010, it appears that both pay items include the Ammo Breakdown Pad. Please clarify.

Answer No. 95: When a facility or structure is referenced it means all work for that

Question No. 96: With regard to CLIN #0002 and #0010, it appears that both pay items include the sitework for Training Station #1. Please clarify.

Answer No. 96: When a facility or structure is referenced it means all work for that

Question No. 97: With regard to CLIN #0010, we believe that the beginning of the description needs to be revised. Presently, it reads “All work site work associated with the . .“. In our opinion, the description should be revised to “All work associated with the . .”, or “All site work associated with the . . .“. Please clarify.

Answer No. 97: The price schedule is revised with this amendment.

Question No. 98: Please clarify which CLIN’s are to include the following structures: the Offense/Defense Building, the Underground Training Structure, the Control Building, Grenadier/Gunnery Structure, and the various training buildings at Station #1 and Station #2.

Answer No. 98: The offense/defense building is station #4, the underground training structure is station #5, the control building and the grenadier/gunnery structure are a part of station #3, Station one is CLIN 002 and station #2 is CLIN 005.

Question No. 99: Please clarify which CLIN’s are to include the pricing of the following detention basins: Detention Basin #1 on Dwg. #CE-104, Detention Basin #2 on Dwg.

#CE-104 & 105, Detention Basin #3 on Dwg. #CE-101, and Detention Basin #4 on Dwg.

#CE-101

Answer No. 99: Price schedule is revised to make this clear.

Question No. 100: CLIN #0010 is titled “Wayment Pond Road”, and is described as including among other things, “the Access Road to Wayment Pond Road”. However, our interpretation of Dwg’s CS-101 and CG-101 indicates that this section of road is an existing gravel road that is not to be cleared, re-graded or resurfaced with gravel.

Therefore, we are not clear as to what scope of roadway work is to be included in this pay item. Please clarify.

Answer No. 100: All work associated with improving the access and drive area in that site are around Station #1.

Question No. 101: CLIN #0011 is described as including “All work associated with the Access Road connecting Stations #1 & #2 and the Ops/Storage Building to Station #3”.

As we find this description to be unclear, please clarify if this pay item is to include all work associated with the new Access Road from Training Station #1 to Training Station #3, starting at roadway station 0+00 and ending at approximate roadway station 10+40.

Answer No. 101: Price schedule is revised with this amendment.

Question No. 102: With regard to CLIN #0012, we find the description to be unclear.

Therefore, please clarify if this pay item is intended to include the new Access Road from Training Station #3 to the Spur Road, from roadway station 10+40 to roadway station 21+20.

Answer No. 102: Price schedule is revised with this amendment.

Question No. 103: With regard to CLIN #0003, please clarify if this pay item is intended to include the improvements to the existing Spur Road from roadway station 0+00 to roadway station 7+24.

Answer No. 103: CLIN 003 goes from road station 0+00 to 5+00.

Question No. 104: We suggest that broad scope items such as erosion control, tree clearing and site restoration be paid as separate lump sum items, rather than be divided amongst the various CLIN’s, as this approach will it easier to understand and easier to allocate the pricing in the bid proposal. For example, at Training Station #1, which CLIN’s are to cover the erosion control and tree clearing limits that are shown on Dwg. #CS-101?

Answer No. 104: No.

Question No. 105: Since the power and telecommunications systems feed all training stations, we request that the pricing of these two items be covered by their own CLIN’s rather than subdivide and allocate portions of the these items amongst the various CLIN’s. Please clarify.

Answer No. 105: Price schedule is revised with this amendment.

Question No. 106: Please clarify if the Aggregate Surface Pavement detail on Dwg.

#CS-503 is to be used for the construction of all new access roads and the improvement to the existing Spur Road.

Answer No. 106: Yes, the Aggregate Surface Pavement detail is for new access roads and improvement of existing Spur Road.

Question No. 107: Please provide a typical cross section through the new access roads that depicts how the new access roads are to be crowned and graded, the thicknesses of the roadway layers, how the typical drainage swale geometry relates to the typical roadway cross section, the typical offset distance between the edge of the new roads and the top of the swale, and how the typical roadway section is blended and sloped to meet the existing topography.

Answer No. 107: Grading information about roadway and ditches can be determined from contours. The total thickness of the roadway layers is 12 inches.

Question No. 108: The plans do not provide cross sections at regular intervals through the new roads and through the five training station sites. This type of information is typically provided in bid documents for similar site development projects, typically at 100 feet on center along the baselines or centerlines. We believe that these types of cross sections are fairly simple to obtain through the government’s CAD files that were used to generate the grading plans that are included in the set of plans. Therefore, we request that these cross sections be provided to the bidders for this project as soon as possible.

Answer No. 108: Cross Sections will not be provided.

Question No. 109: It is not clear from our review of the bid documents how the Contractor is to permanently restore the disturbed land areas on this project that are not being covered with structures or other surface treatment. The plans do not provide any typical details or typical sections that illustrate the finished vegetated areas and topsoil thickness. Please clarify.

Answer No. 109: See Spec Section 32 92 19, Seeding paragraphs 3.1.1 and 3.1.1.1.

Question No. 110: Please clarify if the government has performed any testing of the existing surface soils in the project areas to determine if those soils meet the topsoil composition requirements stated on pages #4 and #5 of Specification Section #32 92 19.

Answer No. 110: The government has not performed any testing on the existing top soils.

Question No. 111: The Technical Specifications include Section #32 12 17 – Hot Mix Bituminous Pavement. Is this section applicable to this project? We have found only gravel roads to be constructed.

Answer No. 111: This section will be deleted with this amendment.

Question No. 112: Please be advised that the plans do not provide any typical trenching, bedding and backfilling details for new drainage pipes. Please provide this missing information as soon as possible. These trenching details should differentiate between pipes installed in rock cuts versus pipes installed in fills, and there should be a typical trench detail for pipes that cross under roads and a typical trench detail for pipes in landscape areas.

Answer No. 112: See Spec Section 33 40 00.

Question No. 113: Dwg. #ES-103 and ES-104 include notes that call out concrete encased ductbanks to be constructed, but the notes do not specify a length of these encased ductbanks or which encasement detail on Dwg. #E-505 is to be used. Please clarify.

Answer No. 113: ES-103 & ES-104: Sections that depict which section requires concrete encase ductbank is already shown in the drawing. Concrete encasement shall extend a minimum of 12" beyond edge of roadbed. For the ES-104, the concrete encasement for the EF-2 circuit at Station 5 (Fed from Station 4) shall be concrete encased for the sections that crosses underneath the road as shown in ES-104, and direct buried for the rest as shown, but it enters into the underground MH it should be installed in RGS Conduit as stated in E-111. Contractor also needs to understand which detail to apply based the type of circuit required in the contract, and in compliance with the code.

Question No. 114: With regard to the typical trench detail for the underground secondary power distribution system on Dwg. #E-505, please clarify which cables are to be installed within PVC conduits and which cables are to be direct buried. As presently depicted in this typical section, all cables have been drawn as if all cables are to be installed in PVC conduits, yet the notes state otherwise. Please clarify.

Answer No. 114: Most installations in the drawings are direct buried, as shown, but in certain areas it shall be encased and in conduits. Contactor needs to understand the definition of direct buried cables and its proper installation requirement as stated in NEC, and apply such installation per requirements in the contract accordingly.

Question No. 115: Dwg. #CS-105 shows two pipe gates. Please clarify if these gates are existing or are they to be constructed under this contract, and if so, under which CLIN’s would these two gates be paid.

Answer No. 115: Gates are to be constructed under contract. This work is under CLIN #6.

Question No. 116: Please clarify why the site plans indicate encircled areas that are not to be excavated. Why are these areas to be protected?

Answer No. 116: Clarification and reason these areas are protected will not be provided.

Question No. 117: A geomembrane liner is called out on Dwg. #CG-104 for Detention Basin #2, and a typical detail is provided on Dwg. #CE-502. With regard to this liner, please clarify the following: (a) please clarify if the geomembrane liner is to extend around the entire perimeter of Detention Basin #2, or is it intended for the liner to be installed for only a portion of the embankment that surrounds Detention Basin #2; (b) please confirm that the other detention basins are not to receive a geomembrane liner; (c) please clarify the thickness and type of geomembrane liner to be used, as the specification section mentions the use of both polyethylene and non-polyethylene seams; (d) please clarify the specifications to allow for various equivalent liner materials to be used, such as Bentomat, PVC, or VLDPE, as this the geomembrane liner on this project appears to be intended only for water retention; (e) please revise the geomembrane liner detail to identify the type and thickness of the bedding material that is needed as a cushion underneath the liner in order to ensure that the liner is not punctured during placement; (f) please revise the geomembrane liner and specifications to identify the type of protection course that is to be placed on top of the liner to prevent the liner from being punctured during the placement of the cover soil; (g) the note on the detail states that the liner shall be placed under the topsoil layer, but the thickness of the topsoil layer is not specified; and, (h) we wish to point out that that the thickness of the cover soil needs to be sufficient to allow for machine placement methods, and that a 4” to 6” thick topsoil layer placed directly on top of the liner is too thin to allow machines to place the topsoil over the liner. Typically, cover soils are placed a minimum of 12” thick on top of geomembrane liners for this reason, and this same 12” thick loose lift thickness is specified in the geomembrane specification section, in paragraph #3.9 on page #02 56 13.

Answer No. 117: Geomebrane liner is for only a portion of Detention Basin # 2 to retain water. Other materials for the liner would be subject to approval by the Contracting Officer. The liner is a core to a small embankment that would retain water. It would not be practical to have a bedding material within the embankment since the soils should not puncture the liner.

Question No. 118: The notes on Dwg. #A-302, #A-303 and #A-304 call out a waterproofing membrane to be installed on all exterior basement walls and underneath the concrete floor slab of the Offense/Defense Building. It is assumed that the elastomeric waterproofing Detail “B” on Dwg. #A-501 is intended for these basement walls. Please provide a typical detail that shows how the waterproofing is to be applied underneath the basement floor slab.

Answer No. 118: THERE IS NO WATERPROOFING UNDERNEATH THE BASEMENT SLAB. THE

DETAIL ON A-501 DOES NOT APPLY.

Question No. 119: Please clarify if the Fluid Applied Waterproofing Specification Section #07 14 00 is applicable to the elastomeric waterproofing called-out in the elastomeric waterproofing Detail “B” on Dwg. #A-501 or is there a different set of specifications that apply to the basement waterproofing system. Also, if this waterproofing specification is applicable to the basement waterproofing, please clarify that the Flood Test will not be required.

Answer No. 119:

NO, THIS SECTION APPLIES FOR THE BASEMENT WATERPROOFING. FLOOD TESTING WOULD

NOT BE REQUIRED FOR THE BASEMENT WATERPROOFING AND THE FLUID APPLIED

WATERPROOFING SPEC WOULD NOT APPLIED TO THE BASEMENT WATERPROOFING.

Question No. 120: With regard to the Fluid Applied Waterproofing Specification Section #07 14 00, please provide suggested manufacturers or products that will produce the required system.

Answer No. 120:

THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THIS WATERPROOFING ARE CONTAINED IN THE SPECIFICATION.

Question No. 121: Specification Section 08 11 13 is applicable to Steel Doors and Ram Breaching Doors, and paragraph #2.3 requires standard Ram Breaching Doors to be provided as indicated on the drawings. However, we have not found any information on the drawings to indicate that Ram Breaching Doors are required. Please clarify.

Answer No. 121:

ALL DOORS AT STATION #1 (DRAWING A-103) ARE RAM BREACHING DOORS.

Question 122: N/A

Question No. 126: Please confirm our interpretation of the bid documents that the Ammo Breakdown Building is not to receive any HVAC.

Answer No. 122: No HVAC required for this open covered structure.

Question No. 123: Dwg. #A-303 contains a note that states “Top of Roof HCP shall be smooth…”. Please define the abbreviation HCP, as this abbreviation does not appear on the Abbreviations drawing, Dwg. #S-002.

Answer No. 123: HCP ABBREVIATION IS “HOLLOW CORE PLANK”.

Question No. 124: Please clarify the concrete floor finishing requirements for the typical slabs-on-grade as well as the topping slabs for the Offense/Defense Building, the…