Slide Presentation - Patton Hall 11.07.2025.pptx

INDUSTRY DAY

PATTON HALL

STRATEGIC ENGAGEMENT CENTER

Baltimore District, USACE

07 NOVEMBER 2025

AGENDA

Introductions

Joint Base Myer –Henderson Hall COL Keith Sandoval, Commander, Joint Base Myer-Henderson Hall Richard LaFreniere, DPW Director, Joint Base Myer –Henderson Hall

Corps of Engineers, Baltimore District COL Francis B. Pera, Commander and District Engineer Daria Van Liew, Deputy District Engineer for Programs & Project Management Paula Beck, Chief, Contracting Officer Bill Tully, Program Manager Kevin Coleman, Chief Construction Division Eli Hirsch, Project Manager Mary P. Foutz, P.E., Chief, Engineering Division Tamara Bonomolo, Contracting Officer Fran Young, Design Manager

IMPROVE CONSTRUCTION

MOVE THE NEEDLE

“Use this opportunity to show that Army Construction can be just as nimble and efficient as private sector construction….. unleash the innovation of the designer and construction contractor”.

COL Pera or Leadership to explain why we are using this acquisition method

Project scope Design and construction of the Patton Hall Strategic Engagement Center.

Demolition of Building 214 except for the Jailhouse.

Utilize Design-Build to Budget The RFP will include space planning and room data sheets to inform the program requirements. Government looking for industry innovative solutions.

The Government is coordinating with VA Department of Environmental Quality to familiarize them with the project.

Discuss that we are not starting from scratch in asking Industry to meet with the customer(s) and find out what they want. We have a business case for specific rooms and quantities, industry to determine the building design and layout. Clarifying that we are demolishing Bldg. 214 but not the Guardhouse.

Project Requirements The table on the left represents the minimum net usable square footage and does not include the building grossing factor.

The square footage is approximate, that room capacities are based on the business plan for this building.

The RFP will include room data sheets providing details of the individual areas.

Under Design Build to Budget, the goal is to maximize scope to the budget within the minimum requirements established.

NET

NET

The point of this slide is to show the specific business case requirements and re-iterate that Industry will competitively provide the best solution to meet “Your design will add square footage for core areas, building circulation and all requirements to occupy the new building.” In addition to Paula’s suggested addition, we may want to clarify that the program square footage indicated is for net usable square footage (maybe change the column heading in the table. It does not include building grossing factor for shared areas like corridors, stairs, elevators, mechanical and electrical rooms, etc.

r requirements.

Project scope Design-Build Contractor determines the siting of the new building, the location of the supporting facilities such as parking and utilities as well as staging within the limit of work.

This area shows the overall limit of disturbance and includes areas where the new building may be sited. We are asking "industry" to provide the best solution to meet the project requirements. The pool area, the parking lot on the righthand side of this layout, the overlap with Buffalo Soldier Road all represent areas where the point of connection(s) for utilities will require work to occur in. It should be noted that the new building may be constructed on the same site as Patton Hall, Bldg. 214 exists now.

Guardhouse (aka "Jailhouse") to be retained Former Administration Building that will be demolished Patton Hall consists of two historic buildings that were combined in the mid 20th century (Guardhouse and Admin Bldg.)

Patton Hall contributes to the Fort Myer National Historic Landmark (NHL) District Historic Context

Explain the iterative additions to Building 214, we had done an analysis to determine if a renovation is cost effective, it is not. Explain that the Guardhouse will not be demolished and will need to be at least stabilized and protected when the remainder of the bldg. Is demolished

Guardhouse (aka "Jailhouse") to be retained Guardhouse (aka "Jailhouse") to be retained JBM-HH is addressing impacts to the Fort Myer NHL District through the execution of a Programmatic Agreement with the VA State Historic Preservation Office and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation Historic Context

Design-build to budget Overview, Vision, and Priorities End User problems to be solved Approach to Security, FPLS, etc.

Execution Plan Space allocation diagrams

FF&E

Base Program Requirements

Architecture Interior Design Structural Security and AT/FP

MEP

Fire Pro / Life Safety Telecommunications

Success of Design-Build to Budget requires the team to think and act as a single entity. Process is intended to be highly collaborative and fully integrated, built on trust, mutual respect, teamwork, innovation and creative problem solving. Program requirements are highly performance-based to provide for innovation and “best solutions”

Ensure focus on “Mission Critical” factors & innovative “Betterments” & “Enhancements” within Budget Reward Technical Proposal “Best Solutions” and NOT “Cheapest” POR Contents A/V systems Site Design Requirements Site Planning and Layout Existing Site Conditions Utilities Landscape

Design-build to budget Phase 1 Goal. Select three offerors to progress to Phase 2 based upon past performance, technical approach, and lead designer.

Past Performance. The Government examines how well the Offeror has performed prior projects similar in size, scope and complexity to the one described in the solicitation.

Technical Approach. Assess the Offeror’s understanding of the project by examining its proposed management plan, organization chart and narrative description of its approach to delivering a project of this magnitude and complexity.

Lead Designer. considers the lead designer’s flexibility and attitude toward design and application to meet the unique requirements for this project.

Phase 2 Goal. Select a single offeror that proposes the ‘best solution’ in terms of cost, schedule and quality.

Proprietary Meetings. Held with each down-selected offeror. Iterative process, approximately 4 weeks apart.

Gov’t introduction Offeror presentation Discussion

Final Proposal Evaluation Criteria.

Design Concept Technical Approach (from Phase 1) Team Organization & Management Approach Schedule Cost

Design-Build to Budget Proprietary Meeting #1 Goal. Introduction of team and scope of the project. Obtain initial feedback on scope, schedule, and budget achievability Government Expectation. Rough concept schedule (key milestones & challenges), initial scope analysis (solutions to major problems, conflicts in documents), and ROM and budget (delta between ROM and budget, impact of budget constraints) Agenda. Items could include requirements overview, early design concepts, site analysis Proprietary meeting #2 Goal. Confirmation from Design-Build Contractor on alignment of scope, schedule, and budget. Continue discussion on project understanding and feedback to advance Offeror driven solutions Government Expectation. Advancement of design incorporating feedback from Proprietary Meeting #1, renderings and example photos, innovative solutions Agenda. Items could include recap of meeting #1, update site plan, exterior design concepts, connection to adjacent sites.

Proprietary meeting #3 Goal. Final confirmation on alignment of scope, schedule and budget. Continue discussion on project understanding and feedback to advance Offeror driven solutions Government Expectation. Design concept almost finalized, detailed, high-quality renderings Agenda. Items could include sustainability and LEED approach, floorplan/stacking plans, utilities walkthrough, exterior concept update

Phase 2 includes a series of iterative engagements with each down-selected offeror to provide an opportunity for each offeror to advance their design solution based upon direct discussion with the Government.

POTENTIAL TIMELINE

*DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION – TBD*

AWARD

ISSUE PHASE 1

ISSUE PHASE II

QUESTIONS?

image19.png image2.png image7.png image25.jpeg image26.png image27.png image28.png image29.jpg image30.png image31.png image1.png image3.png