FBO_Amendment__3_Questions_Responses.pdf

FBO Combined Synopsis/Solicitation - Multi-Discipline Small Business Set-Aside Architect/Engineer

Services for the Baltimore District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, W912DR19R0004 – Amendment #2

Responses to Questions

Question:

Is it acceptable to submit as both a Prime Consultant as well as a Sub-consultant on another team

Government Response:

Yes.

Will the Government accept an Environmental Scientist for the Environmental Engineer position?

No.

Are offerors requested to provide CPARS/ACASS evaluations or, in their absences, PPQs for each

Section F project submitted?

Yes, provide CPARS evaluations if available. Submit PPQs in the absence

Are CPARS/ACASS evaluations, if available, required over PPQs?

Yes, provide CPARS evaluations if available over PPQs.

How many PPQs are required for this response?

One per project unless a CPARS/ACASS is available.

Where should these performance evaluations be placed in the solicitation response?

Provide performance evaluations immediately following project referenced.

Do they count toward the 125 page limit?

No.

Is it permissible to include photograms and graphics in the proposal to support the projects/factors?

Yes.

Is it possible that the due date for this submission could be postponed one week since the Thanksgiving holiday falls in the middle of the response time?

Yes. The new due date for submission is 17 December 2018 by 11AM EST.

Would your department accept proposal and will award as a specialized discipline only or considering to award one contract with the company having all services as one team

Government Response:

The Government will make an award to the four (4) firms that are evaluated as "The Most Highly

Qualified" to provide the full range of services outlined in the synopsis. Firms are required to provide the key disciplines listed in Factor 2 whether through the use of in-house personnel or through the use of sub-consultants.