W912DR-16-T-0030-P00002.pdf

W912DR-16-T-0030

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE EVALUATION AND REPORTING LETTERKENNY ARMY DEPOT, CHAMBERSBURG, PA

The purpose of this amendment is to respond to the Request for Information, revise the bid schedule per the answ ers to the RFI, and to add the past performance questionaire per the instructions to quoters. All other terms and conditions remain the same.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

T 1 18

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 15-Sep-2016

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W912DR-16-T-0030

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

23-Aug-2016

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

15-Sep-2016

CODE

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, BALTIMORE

10 S. HOWARD STREET

ROOM 7000

BALTIMORE MD 21201

W912DR 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

The following have been added by full text:

RESPONSE TO RFI

(RFI) Request for Information

ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE EVALUATION AND REPORTING LETTERKENNY ARMY

DEPOT, CHAMBERSBURG, PA

Solicitation W912DR-16-T0030

Q1 - Is there a contractor currently fulfilling these services or is this a new requirement? If there is an incumbent, would you mind providing the contractor’s name and contract number?

A1 – This is a new requirement, there is no incumbent.

Q2 - Paragraph 5.1 The contractor will need to develop an ECTS system? This section states that the templates will be provided by the government, then proceeds to tell us how the system should perform and lists the required functions.

A2 – NO, an ECTS system is readily available in the current marketplace. The templates are the inspection checklists that are enclosed in Appendices A through F.

Q3 - On pg.22 it states that the contractor shall use the LEAD ECTS for inspections as if it already exists. Is there a current ECTS already in existence?

A3 - No, there is not a current ECTS already in existence at LEAD, however ECTS system is readily available in the current marketplace .

Q4 - CLIN #0001PWS 5.1 - Environmental Compliance Tracking System (ECTS) is the first line item on the Bid Sheet table Pg 8. Will this price need to include development, maintenance, changes and hosting?

A4 – This price should include development, maintenance and hosting.

Q5 - Changes cost extra money so can a limit be established for the number of changes allowed?

A5 – Any changes will be a modification to the contract. Section 5.2 will be revised to indicate this.

“e). Must be able to modify live and history trending devices. This includes the contractor making data changes to the existing manufacturers programming. The contractor shall make no changes to the existing data set in a PLC until the following are done:

1. Approval for the change is obtained (in writing) from LEAD and the Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) via a contract modification request.”

Q6 - Is there an acceptance document in place?

A6 – No.

Q7 - Can the developer use GPS platform over the GIS platform?

A7 – No, they cannot.

Q8 - Can the bid be split out so that the AST/UST tasks of the PWS is a separate bid? AST/UST/Veeder-Root contractors do not run in the same circles as the Gas Fired Equipment and appliance industry?

A8 – The offeror is not precluded from subcontracting their efforts wherever they feel they may be deficient. These are all Environmental Compliance related activities.

Q9 - Bid Pg 13 - Optional Item Option Period 3 - PWS 5.3.3 Evaluation of Gas Fired Equipment in Buildings and Reporting – and 5.4.3 Evaluation of Volatile Organic Compound (VOCs) Emission Control Systems and Reporting

– of Option Period 3 is missing the 5.5.3 task on bid sheet but PWS tasks 5.5.3 is listed on page 36, (pgs 34-36)

A9 – This was an error/omission by leaving out ‘and 5.5.3.’ The bid sheet has been revised.

Q10 - I would recommend that UST, AST, and Veeder-Root Evaluations are performed monthly instead of quarterly, is there a reason they are not monthly?

A10 – LEAD Installation personnel complete the monthly evaluations. Quarterly evaluations are being procured as Quality Assurance (QA) by an Independent third party.

Q11 - In 2018 monthly inspections will be required for all UST systems and monthly monitoring of the ATG leak detection results is already required, for the AST systems most SPCC plans require monthly inspections. Currently completing a method specified in PADEP regulations §245.444(3)-(9) is required at least once every 30 days for

RD.

A11 – LEAD Installation personnel complete the monthly evaluations. Quarterly evaluations are being procured as Quality Assurance (QA) by an Independent third party.

Q12 - I am also of the opinion that it would be proactive to inspect monthly because an issue with the AST/UST can arise at any time after the inspections occur and it is an EPA regulation to begin in 2018.

A12 – LEAD Installation personnel complete the monthly evaluations. Quarterly evaluations are being procured as Quality Assurance (QA) by an Independent third party.

Q13 - The program should be developed with that regulation in mind before it is mandatory and also so we won't have to switch gears in the middle of the project when the regulation is enforced.

A13 – LEAD Installation personnel complete the monthly evaluations. Quarterly evaluations are being procured as Quality Assurance (QA) by an Independent third party.

Q14 – Information on the tank systems is not provided in full, but I want to confirm that routine compliance testing for ATGs, Leak Detectors, Corrosion Protection, Line, containment testings is expected as applicable to the storage tank systems.

A14 – Routine compliance testing for Automatic Tank Gauges shall include leak detection, lines, and containment testing. Only one tank on this contract will require corrosion protection evaluation.

Q15 - Is the three year Facility Operations inspection by a PA certified inspector expected to be performed on this bid?

A15 – Facility Operations inspections are required on this bid, their frequency will be dependent upon the exercising of those respective CLINs.

Q16 - For the quarterly evaluations is LEAD requiring a certified PA DEP Inspector or certified A/B operator in the state PA?

A16 – No certifications are required for the quarterly evaluations.

Q17 - Pg 42 The Contractor is responsible for obtaining security access for themselves, their employees, and any subcontractors to LEAD. Is there a specific company or regulation we need to use for this?

A17 – The COR and Project Manager along with LEAD personnel will provide assistance/guidance with obtaining security access in accordance with the PWS.

Q18 - I am of the opinion there should be an initial site visit that logs everything (all the equipment, pictures, serial numbers, condition and reviews the compliance documents) and that should be a separate line item and a separate report. It would be preferable to perform this immediately so that evaluations can cover all aspects of compliance for the equipment.

A18 – The Installation does not require such a report.

Q19 - Can copies of current testing and inspections be provided? Do you have as-builts drawings?

A19 - There are no formal documents/documentation that testing/inspections have been complete. A populated inspection checklist is submitted/recorded, those checklists are in the appendices. As-built drawings are not available at this time.

Q20 - Who are the A/B operators and will training of C operators be required?

A20 – Lead Installation personnel are the A/B operators. Training of C operators will NOT be required.

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

PAST PERFORMANCE SUBMISSION: (See Attached Past Performance Questionnaire)

Submission Requirements: Past performance refers to the quality of recent project experience from the customer’s perspective. The Offeror shall arrange for the reference customer point of contact for two (2) projects to fill out the Questionnaire and return to Ian Weiss, Contract Specialist, and e-mail Ian.Weiss@usace.army.mil. It is preferred that the questionnaires be forwarded directly by the references. Ensure the reference is clearly marked for the applicable Offeror at submission. The Government will not release the questionnaire forms to the Offeror at any time, in order for the Government to solicit candid, unbiased responses and comments. Two (2) references from previously completed jobs must be submitted and include a point of contact and phone numbers. These references must be relevant to the work which will be performed in this contract. Relevant work is defined as enviromental compliance monitoring of a similar size and scope. References must be recent within the past three (3) years, and need not be Government references.

Evaluation Criteria: The Government will assess the degree of success of Offeror’s recent, relevant past performance. Owners/references will be asked to comment on items such as, timeliness, management of subcontractor work, including timely payment to subs or suppliers, safety, relations between customer and contractor, level of support for such things as correcting errors. Any offeror who has demonstrated satisfactory past performance will be considered eligible for award. Any offeror who demonstrated unsatisfactory past performance will not be considered eligible for award. If the Government does not obtain past performance information for the projects identified by the offeror and cannot establish a past performance record for the offeror through other sources, or if the offeror has no past performance record and cannot tie significant, relevant experience of key personnel proposed for this project to cited experience, past performance will be evaluated neither favorably nor unfavorably. If a given section is not applicable, please indicate as such.

USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ-0) CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)

1. Contractor Information

Firm Name: CAGE Code:

Address: DUNs Number:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:

2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain)

Percent of project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):

3. Contract Information

Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please specify):

Contract Title:

Contract Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Explain Differences:

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):

Explain Differences:

4. Project Description:

Complexity of Work High Med Routine

How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)

CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)

5. Client Information

Name:

Title:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

6. Describe the client’s role in the project:

7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):

8. Client’s Signature:

NO TE: Past performance refers to the quality of recent project experience from the customer’s perspective. The Offeror shall arrange for the reference customer point of contact for two (2) projects to fill out the Questionnaire and return directly to Ian Weiss, Contract Specialist, e-mail at Ian.Weiss@usace.army.mil. The questionnaires must be forwarded directly by the references. Ensure the reference is clearly marked for the applicable Offeror when submitted. The Government will not release the questionnaire forms to the Offeror at any time, in order for the Government to solicit candid, unbiased responses and comments. Two (2) references from previously completed jobs must be submitted and include a point of contact and phone numbers. These references must be relevant to the work which will be performed in this contract. Relevant work is defined as Enviromental compliance monitoring work of a similar size and scope. References must be recent within the past three (3) years, and need not be Government references.

mailto:tamara.c.udasco@usace.army.mil

ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE

RATING DEFINITION NOTE

(E) Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Gove rn m e nt /O w n e r’ s bene fit .

The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.

An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating.

Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

(VG) Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.

(S) Satisfactory Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract.

There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.

(M) Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.

(U) Unsatisfactory

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.

(N) Not Applicable

No information or did not apply to your contract Rating will be neither positive nor negative.

TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT

PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.

1. QUALITY:

a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts E VG S M U N

b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance

E VG S M U N

c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance

d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance)

2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below)

b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project? E VG S M U N

b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes;

responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication)

c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer?

d) Overall customer satisfaction E VG S M U N

4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR

a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force?

b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort E VG S M U N

c) Government Property Control E VG S M U N

d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel E VG S M U N

e) Utilization of Small Business concerns E VG S M U N

f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines E VG S M U N

g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes

h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)

5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)?

b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced E VG S M U N cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client

c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns)

d) Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section.

Yes No

e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.

f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below.

6. SAFETY/S ECURITY

a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues?

(Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.)

b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements.

7. GENERAL

a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues).

b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues) E VG S M U N

c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below) Yes No

d) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor.

Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks. Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary):

The following have been modified:

BID SCHEDULE

FY 16 ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE EVALUATION AND

REPORTING

REVISED 14 SEP 2016

BID SHEET

CLIN Item Man Hours Total CLIN Cost1

Base Year 0001 PWS 5.1 - Environmental

Compliance Tracking System

(ECTS) _________

0002 PWS 5.3 and 5.5 - Evaluation of Gas Fired Equipment in Buildings and Reporting ________ $_________

0003 PWS 5.4 and 5.5 - Evaluation of Volatile Organic Compound (VOCs) Emission Control Systems and Reporting ________ $_________

0004 PWS - 5.6.1 a - Perform Yearly Evaluations of 20 Chromalox Heaters and 6 Watlow Heaters ________ $_________

0005 PWS 5.6.1 b – Perform Quarterly Compliance Evaluation and Reporting on the condition of 42 Veeder Root monitoring systems.

0006 PWS 5.6.1 c and Table 1 - Perform Quarterly Evaluations of 40 AST/USTs and report using LEAD furnished checklist

0007 PWS 5.14 - Accident Prevention Plan and Site Safety Health Plan

0008 Optional Item Base Year PWS

5.6.12 - Perform additional PADEP regulated AST inspections.

0009 Optional Item Base Year PWS

5.7.1 Building 1 AST

Compliance Activities

0010 Optional Item Base Year PWS

5.7.2 a – Install a new containment (Pisces or equivalent) containment sump

0011 Optional Item Base Year PWS

5.7.2 b – Install new manway (with all new fittings).

0012 Optional Item Base Year PWS

5.7.2 c - Leak test the fuel line conduits, the new containment sump, and the new UST manway after installation at the existing Building 527 Emergency Generator UST.

0013 Optional Item Base Year PWS

5.7.2 d - Install a 1,000 gallon temporary diesel tank to supply the Building 527 generator, along with associated work. ________ $_________

0014 Optional Item Base Year PWS

5.7.2 e - Equip temporary AST with interstitial leak detection (manual gauge, not electronic), 4 “overfill drop tube, and 4” inch fills. Product and return lines shall be marked with high ________ $_________ visibility pipe markers and directional arrows.

0015 Optional Item Base Year PWS

5.7.2 f - Replace the faulty (failed regulatory compliance check) concrete pad (approximately 6’X12’) at the Building 527 emergency generator UST site after UST work has been completed.

Install new 5 gallon spill bucket. ________ $_________

0016 Optional Item Base Year – PWS

5.7.3 Install one new Veeder

Root system to AST

Base Year Total

Option Period 1

1001 PWS 5.2.1– ECTS Option period 1

1002 Optional Item Option Period 1 PWS 5.3.1 and 5.5.1 OPTION - Evaluation of Gas Fired Equipment in Buildings and Reporting – Option Period 1 ________ $_________

1003 Optional Item Option Period 1 PWS 5.4.1 and 5.5.1 OPTION - Evaluation of Volatile Organic Compound (VOCs) Emission Control Systems and Reporting

– Option Period 1 ________ $_________

1004 Optional Item Option Period 1 PWS 5.6.2 - Perform a Pre PADEP Regulated UST Evaluation on Five Regulated USTs at LEAD at Building 10, ________ $_________

321 (2), 521, and 527 1005 Optional Item Option Period 1

PWS 5.6.3 - Perform a PADEP Regulated UST Evaluation on Five Regulated USTs at LEAD at Building 10, 321 (2), 521, and 527 ________ $_________

1006 Optional Item Option Period 1 PWS 5.6.4 - Perform Option Yearly Evaluations of 20 Chromalox Heaters and 6 Watlow Heaters – Option Period 1

1007 Optional Item Option Period 1 PWS 5.6.7 - Perform Quarterly Compliance Evaluation and Reporting on the condition of 42 Veeder Root monitoring systems – Option Period 1. _________

1008 Optional Item Option Period 1 PWS 5.6.10 - Perform a pre PADEP regulated AST Evaluation on two regulated ASTs at LEAD at Buildings 357 and 360 _ Option period 1 _________

1009 Optional Item Option Period 1 PWS 5.6.11 - Perform a PADEP regulated AST Evaluation on two regulated ASTs at LEAD at Buildings 357 and 360. – Option Period1 _________

1010 Optional Item Option Period 1 PWS 5.6.13 and Table 1 in PWS

5.6.1 - Perform Quarterly Evaluations of 40 ASTs/USTs and report using LEAD furnished checklist – Option Period 1. ________ $_________

1011 Optional Item Option Period 1 PWS 5.6.12 - Perform additional PADEP regulated AST inspections. ________ $_________

1012 Optional Item Option Period 1 PWS 5.7.3 Install one new Veeder Root system to AST ________ $_________

Option Period 1 Total

Option Period 2

2001 PWS 5.2.2 – ECTS Option

Period 2

2002 Optional Item Option Period 2 PWS 5.3.2 and 5.5.2 - OPTION

- Evaluation of Gas Fired Equipment in Buildings and Reporting – Option Period 2 ________ $_________

2003 Optional Item Option Period 2 PWS 5.4.2 and 5.5.2 OPTION - Evaluation of Volatile Organic Compound (VOCs) Emission Control Systems and Reporting

– Option Period 2 ________ $_________

2004 Optional Item Option Period 2 PWS 5.6.12 - Perform additional PADEP regulated AST inspections Option Period

2. ________ $_________

2005 Optional Item Option Period 2 PWS 5.7.3 Install one new Veeder Root system to AST – Option period 2 ________ $_________

2006 Optional Item Option Period 2 PWS 5.6.5 - Perform Yearly Evaluations of 20 Chromalox Heaters and 6 Watlow Heaters – Option Period 2.

2007 Optional Item Option Period 2 PWS 5.6.8 - Perform Quarterly Compliance Evaluation and Reporting on the condition of 42 Veeder Root monitoring ________ $_________ systems – Option Period 2.

2008 Optional Item Option Period 2 PWS 5.6.14 and Table 1 in PWS

5.6.1 - Perform Quarterly Evaluations of 40 ASTs/USTs and report using LEAD furnished checklist – Option Period 2. ________ $_________

Option Period 2 Total

Option Period 3

3001 PWS 5.2.3 – ECTS Option

Period 3

3002 Optional Item Option Period 3 PWS 5.3.3 and PWS 5.5.3 Evaluation of Gas Fired Equipment in Buildings and Reporting – Option Period 3 ________ $_________

3003 Optional Item Option Period 3 PWS 5.4.3 and PWS 5.5.3 Evaluation of Volatile Organic Compound (VOCs) Emission Control Systems and Reporting

– Option Period 3 ________ $_________

3004 Optional Item Option Period 3 PWS 5.6.12 - Perform additional PADEP regulated AST inspections – Option Period 3. ________ $_________

3005 Optional Item Option Period 3 PWS 5.7.3 Install one new Veeder Root system to AST- Option Period 3 ________ $_________

3006 Optional Item Option Period 3 PWS 5.6.6 - Perform Option Periodly Evaluations of 20 Chromalox Heaters and 6 Watlow Heaters – Option ________ $_________

Period 3.

3007 Optional Item Option Period 3 PWS 5.6.9 - Perform Quarterly Compliance Evaluation and Reporting on the condition of 42 Veeder Root monitoring systems – Option Period 3. ________ $_________

3008 Optional Item Option Period 3 PWS 5.6.1 and Table 1 in PWS

5.6.1 - Perform Quarterly Evaluations of 40 ASTs/USTs and report using LEAD furnished checklist – Option Period 3. ________ $_________

Option Period 3 Total

Contract Total Value

1Offeror’s total costs should include all labor, materials, transportation, ODCs and equipment

Note: All Line items must be priced or the Quote will be considered non- responsive.

(End of Summary of Changes)