Whiteman Air Force Base Market Intelligence Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 108 KB Posted
- Attached to
- WAFB/B-21 Project Update to Industry
- Solicitation number
- W912DQSSWAFB
About this file
This is a Market Intelligence Questionnaire issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) for Whiteman Air Force Base. The questionnaire does not address a specific project but seeks contractor feedback on multiple briefed projects related to Other Transactions Authority (OTA) procurements.
The questionnaire contains six questions designed to gather market intelligence from potential contractors: the required timeline between Request for Qualifications (RFQ) issuance and White Paper submission; concerns or reservations about participating in OTA procurements versus traditional FAR contracts; primary uncertainties regarding USACE's OTA evaluation methodology; contractor opinions on qualifications USACE should prioritize during down-select; preferred levels of project detail for Construction Manager at-Risk (CMAR) with OTA engagements when design documents range from 35-100% complete (with options for all drawings and specifications, select drawings for general understanding, or general scope summary); and best practices or standard commercial practices relevant to transitioning to OTAs. Feedback must be submitted no later than 11:00 AM CST on September 18, 2026, to three USACE representatives: michael.g.france@usace.army.mil, stephanie.r.kretzer@usace.army.mil, and angelique.m.dilmore@usace.army.mil.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Industry Day Webinar Slides 20260908_FINAL.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Whiteman Air Force Base Market Intelligence Questionnaire
Please complete the following questionnaire. This is not specific to any one project, but to all the projects briefed today.
1. How much time do you need between the Request for Qualifications (RFQ) and submission of the White Paper?
2. Do you have any major concerns or reservations about participating in an OTA procurement environment versus traditional FAR contracts?
3. What are your primary uncertainties regarding how USACE will evaluate an OTA procurement?
4. What qualifications do you believe should be most important for USACE to prioritize during down-select?
5. What level of project detail would be beneficial to share with contractors for CMAR w/ OT when preparing for the white paper submittal, where there are 35-100% design documents?
o All drawings and specs?
o Select drawings for general understanding (No detail sheets, no enlarged plans)?
o General scope summary?
6. Are there any best practices or standard commercial practices to take into consideration in transitioning to OTAs?
Please submit your feedback NLT than 11:00 AM CST on 18 September 2026 to michael.g.france@usace.army.mil, stephanie.r.kretzer@usace.army.mil, and angelique.m.dilmore@usace.army.mil.
mailto:michael.g.france@usace.army.mil mailto:stephanie.r.kretzer@usace.army.mil mailto:angelique.m.dilmore@usace.army.mil
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .