CPW_ProjNet_Questions_-_Report__8-29-17.pdf

UNCLASSIFIED\\FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Bid Inquiry Contractor Report All Inquiries

Project: Collaborative Program Work Space Review: Collaborative Program Work Space (00001) (sorted by CommentID ) Displaying 14 inquiries.

Id Discipline Sheet Detail Spec 7104893 Security Security Classification Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Will Solicitation W912DQ-17-R-7003 require the issuance of a DD254? If so, what security classification/ level will the DD254 require?

On: Aug 11 2017.

Government Response. . There will not be access to classified information by the contractor. Right now, USACE does not require the issuance of a DD254. On: Aug 15 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7106598 Information Management 8 2.2 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

What method of delivery of the comprehensive project record is acceptable?

On: Aug 14 2017.

Government Response. . We cannot accept external hard drives and or jump drives. We will download the final project record and save it on our server. Other options can be proposed by offerors. On: Aug 17 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7106602 Information Management 8 1 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO) please provide an estimated number of government users during the various project phases, such as planning, D/B selection, designing, building, transition.

On: Aug 14 2017.

Government Response. . The Government is anticipating approximately 120 USACE users, and 120 NGA users. The Government users include both government employees and contracted employees. We can only guess at the quantity of contracted users, but we anticipate that during construction there may be between roughly 200-500 contractor employees on the job at a time between managers, designers, superintendents, QC's, subs and consultants, etc.

The entire construction effort will cost approximately $850 million. Contracted users will include a primary D-B firm; a design consultant A-E firm; a commissioning A-E firm; and five small-business construction contractors. All will be working under their own contracts. The five small business construction contractors will be building a remote inspection facility, two access control points, landscaping install, visitor control center parking lot, and on-site construction office. The effort will also have three construction management A-E firms On: Aug 17 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7111391 Information Management 12 Construct Phase General Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Is this RFP addressing replacing the traditional specification sections in Div 01 regarding close-out documentation delivery, as-built delivery, etc. with the deliverables from the CPW?

On: Aug 17 2017.

Government Response. . No. This is not in the RFP requirements. On: Aug 22 2017

Page 1 of 4ProjNet: Logged In User

8/29/2017https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicPublicReportAl...

Current Request Status: Request Closed Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7111406 Information Management 12 Transition Phase General Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

In the Period of Performance, is the final two (2) years, Transition, included in the potential total eight (8) year period of performance?

On: Aug 17 2017.

Government Response. . Yes. Transition to full operations may not occur cleanly within a neat specified timeframe. Some elements of the facilities will transition to O&M ahead of a two year timeframe while some facilities will undergo construction. On: Aug 22 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7111409 Information Management 9 Required Features 8 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO) regarding 24/7 reliability and access, the CPW site will meet the reliability access requirements, will normal business hours, Central Time Zone, be acceptable for costumer support?

On: Aug 17 2017.

Government Response. . Reference the RFP. The contract requires 24/7 reliability and access. On: Aug 22 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7111410 Information Management 10 Required Features 9 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Regarding Section 508 accessibility requirements, since the CPW and the technology it supports is a visually based operation, will this requirement still apply to those with a visual impairment?

On: Aug 17 2017.

Government Response. . No. On: Aug 22 2017 Government Response. . The text below appends or clarifies ALL previous replies.

Correction to the previous answer...

Yes. All Section 508 accessibility requirements apply prior to full implementation (prior to exercising Option Period 1) On: Aug 29 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7111416 Information Management 10 Required Features 14 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Regarding the O&M integration (also 1. 'comprehensive record) the CPW will have a complete archive of all document processed/shared during the Program, will the government want a stand alone HTML report?

On: Aug 17 2017.

Government Response. . Options can be proposed by offerors. On: Aug 22 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7111430 Information Management 12 Desired Feature 2 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Regarding the Web Cam feature, is it acceptable for others (not the CPW provider) to upload Web Cam files? (note that these files may be uploaded for storage and downloaded for use at any time)

On: Aug 17 2017.

Government Response. . Yes. On: Aug 22 2017

Page 2 of 4ProjNet: Logged In User

Current Request Status: Request Closed Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7111448 Information Management 12 Desired Feature 3 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Regarding 'construction progress photos and documents linked to drawings' is it acceptable for others (not the CPW provider) to upload these files? (note that CPW provider cannot create content or author a document)

On: Aug 17 2017.

Government Response. . It is desired that field technicians be able to take pictures through the CPW program while on a mobile unit and link to drawings. On: Aug 22 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7111453 Information Management 12 Desired Feature 5 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Does the government want a 'google doc-like', real time, collaboration feature within the CPW?

On: Aug 17 2017.

Government Response. . Yes. On: Aug 22 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7116021 Information Management 15 4.5 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Regarding FedRAMP High ATO does the USACE have latitude in its schedule to go beyond 12 months for certification?

On: Aug 21 2017.

Government Response. . Our Base CLIN is structured to complete FedRAMP High prior to exercising Option Period 1. On: Aug 29 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7116029 Information Management 1 001 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Will the USACE accept a non conforming submission? Specially associated wth FedRAMP High ATO

On: Aug 21 2017.

Government Response. . We will accept a non-conforming submission, but it must meet all requirements prior to exercising Option Period 1. On: Aug 29 2017 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

7119360 Other 1 1 1 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

1. Is there a specific format (font size, font type, margins, line spacing, etc.) for the Technical Capabilities section including the body and headers/footers?

2. Is there a page limit for the Technical Capabilities section?

3. Is there a specific format (font size, font type, margins, line spacing, etc.) for the Experience Forms?

4. Is there a page limit for the Experience Forms?

5. Is there a specific format required for the price proposal or do offerors need to submit a lump sum price using the format provided in Section B of the solicitation?

Page 3 of 4ProjNet: Logged In User

6. What is the expected contract award date?

7. What is the anticipated notice to proceed date for the contract upon award?

8. Is Bluebeam in use currently, or will it be used by the team?

9. Will PlanGrid or BIM360 be used?

10. How many total system users will there be? Internal? External?

11. There is a requirement for "Dedicated Customer Support". Is the expectation that the selected vendor will have a full-time dedicated team that will only support this project? Or will a shared support team meet this requirement as long as it is 24/7?

12. Are there any integrations with other systems (Financial, Enterprise records Management systems, etc) required during the course of the 8 1-year periods?

13. What is the preferred training method? Onsite or remote, or a mix?

14. Will ODC (other direct costs) be accounted for separately or should we include in our response?

On: Aug 23 2017.

Government Response. . The following responses, are directly related to the corresponding Numbered Question.

1. No.

2. No. Please limit your submission to only pertinent information.

3. No.

4. No. However, experience should be relevant to this acquisition.

5. Please fill out the Section B price schedule with your proposal. Reference FAR Provision 52.212-1(b) if you are also providing an additional alternate schedule with your proposal.

6. Proposals are valid for 90 days. Section L has been updated to reflect how long proposals are valid.

7. A contract award is anticipated following the government selection

8. Bluebeam is not currently in use, and not anticipated.

9. We would like the freedom to upload files from appropriate design/construction software as per the Performance Work Statement.

10. Please see response to 7106602

11. A shared support team may meet the requirement.

12. Integration with other enterprise systems is not anticipated at this time, but could be desirable.

13. The preferred method of training is most likely a mix of on-site and remote.

14. Please include all other direct costs in your submission. This is a firm, fixed-price contract. On: Aug 29 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

Report Complete

UNCLASSIFIED\\FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Patent 11/892,984 ProjNet property of ERDC since 2004.

Page 4 of 4ProjNet: Logged In User