W912CH-24-R-0168 0001.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. Contract ID Code Page Of

2. Amendment/Modification No.

3. Effective Date

4. Requisition/Purchase Req No.

5. Project No. (If applicable)

6. Issued By Code 7. Administered By (If other than Item 6) Code

8. Name And Address Of Contractor (No., Street, City, County, State and Zip Code)

9A. Amendment Of Solicitation No.

9B. Dated (See Item 11)

10A. Modification Of Contract/Order No.

10B. Dated (See Item 13) Code Facility Code

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning ____________ copies of the amendments: (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. Accounting And Appropriation Data (If required)

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS

It Modifies The Contract/Order No. As Described In Item 14.

A. This Change Order is Issued Pursuant To: The Changes Set Forth In Item 14 Are Made In

The Contract/Order No. In Item 10A.

B. The Above Numbered Contract/Order Is Modified To Reflect The Administrative Changes (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) Set

Forth In Item 14, Pursuant To The Authority of FAR 43.103(b).

C. This Supplemental Agreement Is Entered Into Pursuant To Authority Of:

D. Other (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return _______________ copies to the Issuing Office.

14. Description Of Amendment/Modification (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. Name And Title Of Signer (Type or print)

16A. Name And Title Of Contracting Officer (Type or print)

15B. Contractor/Offeror 15C. Date Signed 16B. United States Of America 16C. Date Signed

By (Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

PREVIOUS EDITIONS UNUSABLE

30-105-02 STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

SEE SCHEDULE

X

Cost Plus Fixed Fee

0001 2024DEC20

W912CH

ACC-DTA

6501 E. 11 MILE RD.

DETROIT ARSENAL, MI 48397-5000

DANE HANSEN

EMAIL: DANE.J.HANSEN2.CIV@ARMY.MIL

W912CH-24-R-0168

2024NOV27

X

X

/SIGNED/

2 signed

SEE SECOND PAGE FOR DESCRIPTION

1 27

CONTINUATION SHEET

Reference No. of Document Being Continued Page of

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

SECTION A - SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

Buyer Name: DANE HANSEN

Buyer Office Symbol/Telephone Number: CCTA-AMO-B/(571)588-9123

Type of Contract 1: Cost Plus Fixed Fee

Kind of Contract: Service Contracts

*** End of Narrative A0000 ***

The purpose of Amendment 0001 is as follows:

1. In Section C, DESCRIPTION/SPECIFICATIONS/WORK STATEMENT, the following are revised as follows:

a) C.11 removes Contractor Business Data Report (DD Form 1921-3) requirements and CDRL A030.

b) C.11.4 is marked as Reserved as of Contractor Business Data Report being removed under C.11.

2. In Section J, LIST OF ATTACHMENTS, CDRLS - EXHIBIT A, is revised as follows:

a) CDRL A028, Resource Distribution Table (RDT) - The number of calendar days specified in Block 16. Remarks, is revised from 15 calendar days to 14 calendar days.

b) CDRL A029, Cost and Hour Report (FlexFile) - The number of calendar days specified in Block 16. Remarks, is revised from 15 calendar days to 14 calendar days.

c) CDRL A030, Contractor Business Data Report (DD Form 1921-3), is removed and marked as Reserved.

d) CDRL A031, Bill of Materials (BOM) - The number of calendar days specified in Block 16. Remarks, is revised from 15 calendar days to 14 calendar days.

*** END OF NARRATIVE A0003 ***

2 27

W912CH-24-R-0168

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

SECTION C - DESCRIPTION/SPECIFICATIONS/WORK STATEMENT

C.1.0 SCOPE

C.1.1 General System Technical Support (STS) Work Statements

The contractor shall support the following work statements as required by Work Directives (WD) as incorporated into the contract via modification.

C.1.2 Work Directives (WD)

C.1.2.1 All work under this contract section shall be performed only to the extent authorized by WDs incorporated into the contract through a modification issued by the Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO). The Government is under no obligation to pay for work performed outside the scope of a given WD, nor shall the Government be under obligation to pay for the expenditure of hours in excess of the hours listed on a given WD.

C.1.2.1.2 If the contractor has been tasked to perform any effort, which it thinks is beyond the scope of the contract, it shall immediately notify the Contracting Officer in writing. The Contracting Officer will issue a determination on the action within ten business (10) days.

Any such work performed, which is not covered by an approved WD, relieves the Government of all liability for claims of reimbursement for those efforts.

C.1.2.1.3 In accomplishing the effort under this contract, the contractor agrees that it shall not duplicate or otherwise provide efforts, present or future, required to be performed under any current or past contracts.

C.1.2.1.4 The contractor shall provide input for scope and storybooks required by the Government to create WDs, schedules, hours, and cost projections.

C.2 Systems Engineering

C.2.1 The contractor shall be responsible for Systems Engineering, to include design, redesign, development, integration, validation, and testing for all systems, subsystems, hardware, and software reflected by the technical activities conducted under this contract. The contractor is responsible for ensuring that optimum solutions are introduced into the transmission design without sacrifice in areas of total system performance, reliability, durability, safety, cost, maintainability, and quality. The contractor may be required to conduct design studies, feasibility and trade-off studies, safety and human factors analysis, perform market surveys, fabricate hardware, prepare test plans, and perform testing. These efforts would be required in order to correct known or potential deficiencies, improve performance, accomplish cost reductions, or analyze program alternatives. The contractor may be required to prepare engineering hardware cost and schedule estimates based on the production quantities. In addition, the contractor may be required to prepare cost and schedule estimating for the application of such hardware at a specific maintenance level, such as depot. The contractor may be required to resolve field problems and secondary item procurement problems and develop solutions for such problems as they arise. The contractor shall maintain facility vehicles in accordance with (IAW) established maintenance procedures found in vehicle technical manuals.

Maintenance shall include those design enhancements required by WDs. The contractor shall design for commonality between the Bradley

Fighting Vehicle (BFV), Paladin Integrated Management (PIM), Multiple Launch Rocket System (MLRS), and Armored Multi-Purpose Vehicle

(AMPV) platforms.

C.2.2 The contractor shall provide a detailed review for all proposed work under this contract. This review shall identify the need for specialty engineering involvement in support of design effort. The specialty engineering disciplines shall consist of Systems

Engineering, Quality, Product Support, Training and Maintenance Engineering, System Test Integration, System Safety, Human Factors, Reliability and Maintainability (RAM), System Analysis, System Validation, and Human Systems Integration (HSI).

C.2.3 The contractor shall be responsible for participation in all design review meetings, review of design parameter documents for appropriate load conditions and safety factors, assistance in selection of safety critical items, and participation in safety review and failure analysis board meetings.

C.2.4 When potential improvements or cost reduction areas are identified, the contractor shall conduct cost effectiveness studies and submit recommendations for each prospective improvement or cost reduction project as required by WD(s).

C.2.5 The contractor shall conduct technical/design analysis to confirm adequacy of component design and document the results.

C.2.6 The contractor shall conduct producibility analysis in the development of changes to Government-controlled items performed under this contract to assure the systems, subsystems, and components are producible in the most effective manner consistent with quality, reliability, and design requirements.

C.3 Human Systems Integration (HSI)

3 27

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

The contractor shall provide Human Engineering Progress Reports (HEPR) for all approved ECPs that affect the soldier machine interface.

C.4 Environmental, Safety, and Occupational Health (ESOH)

C.4.1 System Safety Program Requirements

The contractors system safety program shall identify, assess, mitigate, and continuously track, control, and document environmental, safety, and occupational health (ESOH) mishap risks encountered in performing the tasks needed to execute the contract. The system safety program is responsible for the implementation and monitoring of engineering and management principles, criteria, and techniques to achieve acceptable mishap risk, within the constraints of operational effectiveness, time, and cost, throughout the contract. A safe design is a prerequisite for safe operations, with the goal being to produce an inherently safe product that will have the minimum safety-imposed operational restrictions IAW MIL-STD-882E. The contractor shall prepare and deliver a System Safety Program Plan (SSPP) that describes the planned safety tasks and activities necessary to execute a comprehensive and effective System Safety Program, IAW

CDRL A001.

C.4.2 Health Hazard Assessment Report (HHAR)

The contractor shall develop a HHAR to identify health hazards and recommend engineering controls, equipment, and protective procedures, to reduce the associated acceptable risk. The HHAR shall be delivered to the Government in contractor format IAW CDRL A002.

Issues to be addressed within the report shall include:

- Noise

- Toxic gases

- Carbon Monoxide

- Ammonia

- Oxides of nitrogen and sulfur

- Toxic chemicals

- Ionizing and non-ionizing radiation

- Heat and cold (to include heat stress)

- Shock and Whole Body Vibration to crew members

- Address the chemicals identified in the Material Safety Data Sheets to be provided IAW SAE-AMS2825.

C.4.3 Safety Assessment Report (SAR)

The contractor shall develop a SAR IAW MIL-STD-882E (Task 301) and deliver it IAW CDRL A003. The SAR shall include the Software System

Safety Assessment and the Software System Safety specific test results.

C.4.4 Hazard Tracking System (HTS)

The contractor shall prepare a HTS IAW MIL-STD-882E, Task 106 (Hazard Tracking System). The HTS shall include the findings from MIL-STD-

882E Task 205 (System Hazard Analysis), Task 208 (Functional Hazard Analysis), and Task 210 (Environmental Hazard Analysis). The contractor shall document and track all hazards from identification until the hazard is eliminated or the associated risk is reduced to a level acceptable to the Government. The HTS shall be delivered IAW CDRL A032. In the event design changes impact hazards, the contractor shall notify the COR within two calendar days. All hazards shall remain documented in the HTS.

C.4.5 Critical Safety Program (CSP)

The CSP described herein is applicable to any items for which drawings will be delivered to the Government.

C.4.5.1 CSP Definitions. The following definitions apply:

C.4.5.1.1 Critical Safety Items (CSI)

A part, assembly, installation, or production system with one or more critical characteristics that, if not conforming to the design data or quality requirements, would likely result in an unsafe condition. Unsafe conditions include conditions which would cause loss or damage to the end item or major component, or loss of control of the vehicle, or serious injury to personnel. Unsafe conditions are those in hazard severity categories IA-D, II A-C, and III A-B of the risk acceptance level definitions, IAW MIL-STD-882E.

C.4.5.1.2 Critical Safety Characteristics (CSC)

A CSC is any feature (i.e. tolerance, finish, material composition, manufacturing, assembly, or inspection process) of a product, material, or process, which, if nonconforming or missing would cause the failure or malfunction of the critical safety item.

4 27

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

C.4.5.2 Identification of CSIs

The contractor shall clearly identify each CSI and assembly process associated with design changes to the current product baseline. The contractor shall clearly identify the CSCs for each CSI on the engineering parts, engineering top drawings, part drawings, assembly drawings, and process documentation. The contractor shall ensure that all designated or identified CSCs shall have an associated control method. The control method, as a minimum, shall be either a Statistical Process Control (SPC) at a process capability index greater than or equal to 1.66, or a 100% inspection. The contractor shall annotate the control method in the drawing notes for all designated or identified CSCs. The specific method for marking drawings shall be as delineated in MIL-STD-31000 and ASME Y14.100.

C.4.5.3 Data Sources

Identification of CSIs shall be based on the following data sources:

- Engineering analysis

- Failure modes and effects, criticality analysis (MIL-STD-1629)

- Safety assessment / safety hazard analysis (MIL-STD-882E)

- Development testing / operational testing results

- RAM engineering assessments

- Previous experience using like items or designs

- Logistics Support Analysis (LSA) data

- Component qualification test results

C.4.5.4 The contractor shall validate the CSI requirements expressed herein to ensure that all critical safety aspects of the design are accurately depicted on deliverable drawings, and parts or materials operate below fatigue limits or stress levels. The contractor shall ensure that the Government can verify these requirements without the use of destructive inspection equipment. The contractors validation shall be based on engineering analyses of the CSI characteristics, and the validation shall consider design changes, and deterioration through time from use, fatigue life, and operating conditions.

C.4.5.5 CSI Master List

The contractor shall prepare and deliver a master list of CSIs and associated critical characteristics, including nomenclatures and Part

Numbers IAW Critical Safety Item(s)/Characteristics Report (CDRL A004). The contractor shall maintain and update the CSI list throughout the life of the contract. The contractor shall also reference the CSIs on vehicle class and division drawings. This list shall be dynamic in nature, with changes taking place as experience and knowledge are obtained, and as design changes are incorporated into the system.

C.4.6 Safety Control Board

The contractor shall establish a safety control board consisting of representatives from the contractors design, quality, manufacturing, field service, engineering, safety, and other appropriate departments for the purpose of reviewing and formalizing all CSIs delivered to the Government IAW CDRL A004.

C.4.7 Environmental, Safety, and Occupational Health (ESOH) Working Group (WG) Support

The contractor shall participate as an advisory member of the Bradley Fighting Vehicle Systems (BFVS) ESOH WG, as detailed in the WD(s).

This participation shall include, at a minimum: 1) attending the ESOH WG meetings on an as needed basis based on program ESOH efforts and concerns, and 2) providing input to action items resulting from the ESOH WG meetings.

C.4.8 ESOH Review Board

The contractor shall participate as an advisory member for the Governments BFVS ESOH Review Board, as detailed in the WD(s). This participation shall include: 1) attending the ESOH Review Board meetings on an as needed basis based on program ESOH efforts and concerns, and 2) providing input to action items resulting from the ESOH Review Board meetings.

C.4.9 Environmental Compliance and Hazardous Materials Management

C.4.9.1 Environmental Compliance

The contractor shall ensure that all aspects of contract execution in this agreement are in compliance with applicable International, United States Federal, State, interstate and/or local environmental regulations and requirements. Such regulations, conditions, or instructions in effect or prescribed by any International, Federal, State, interstate or local governmental agency are hereby made a condition of this Agreement. The contractor shall immediately notify the COR if the Government gives any instruction or direction the contractor believes may result in violation of applicable law(s) and or regulation(s). For contractor activities conducted at a

Government facility or installation, the contractor shall immediately notify the Government of any nonconformance and/or noncompliance related to this Statement of Work (SOW).

5 27

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

C.4.9.2 Hazardous Materials Management

For the purposes of this contract, hazardous materials shall be defined by FED-STD-313. A Radioactive material is defined as any source material, as defined by Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 40, Domestic Licensing of Source Material, in excess of 0.05 percent by weight. Specific prohibited hazardous materials for the contract are identified in section C.4.9.3. Prohibited materials requirements shall apply to all components, parts, and materials provided under this contract, including items purchased through a subcontractor or supplier, COTS components, OEM parts, and manufactured parts.

C.4.9.3 Prohibited Materials

The system shall not have any prohibited materials (including alloys containing prohibited materials) present in or on any delivered systems or support equipment, required for operation and sustainment of the system, or used in final manufacture and assembly processes.

The following are prohibited materials: asbestos, beryllium, Class I and Class II Ozone Depleting Substances (ODS), hydrofluorocarbons

(HFCS), hexavalent chromium, cadmium, mercury, lead, radioactive materials, and other Group 1 Agents classified as "carcinogenic to humans" by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) Monographs.

The following exceptions are allowed without prior approval from the Government:

- Cadmium and hexavalent chromium on electrical connectors and back shells used to mate with cadmium electrical connectors on Government

Furnished Equipment (GFE) or used in an Automatic Fire Extinguishing System (AFES)

- Products listed under "Priming" and "Topcoating" in MIL-DTL-53072, Table I

- Lead-acid batteries

- Lead solder

- Leaded battery terminal adaptors/clamps

- Silica used in adhesives and sealants

- Fuels specified for use in the requirements of this contract

- Steel containing up to 0.35 % lead by weight

- Aluminum containing up to 0.4 % lead by weight

- Copper and Brass alloys containing up to 4 % lead by weight

- Beryllium and Beryllium alloys used in electrical components

- Mercury containing components compliant with European Union (EU) Directive 2011/65/EU (RoHS 2)

- Trace amounts of identified restricted materials contained in base materials and/or alloys. For the purposes of this contract trace amounts are defined as <0.1% by weight for carcinogens and <1% by weight for all other materials

- HFCs in fire extinguishing systems in crew-occupied spaces

- R134a in ground vehicle air conditioning systems

C.4.9.4 Prohibited Materials Waivers

Waivers from the prohibited materials requirements shall not be permissible except where a suitable alternative does not exist. The contractor shall submit waiver requests to the COR no later than 90 days after contract award using the Request for Use of Prohibited

Materials (Attachment 0001). Waiver requests shall include detailed technical justification for use of prohibited hazardous materials.

The Government will make the final determination on whether sufficient justification has been provided to support approval of any waiver requests. Government response will be provided to the contractor within 30 days of receiving sufficient justification for the waiver request. The contractor shall not deliver any items containing prohibited materials without Government approval of the waiver request.

This includes purchased parts of components such as fasteners, electrical connectors, and lubrication fittings.

C.4.10 Hazardous Materials Management Report (HMMR)

The contractor shall prepare and deliver a Hazardous Materials Management Report (HMMR) IAW CDRL A005 and IAW National Aerospace

Standard (NAS) 411 REV 2 (dated April 29, 1994), section 4.4. (Exception to NAS 411 REV 2 section 4.4.1: In addition to those hazardous materials delivered on the system and required for operation and maintenance, the HMMR shall identify: all hazardous materials used in final system manufacture and assembly, specifying the process(es) utilizing the materials; any hazardous materials created by the system; and any anticipated hazardous wastes created during operation and maintenance of the system.) The HMMR shall specify which phase

(manufacture, operation, and sustainment) that each material is required for or created in.

For the life of the contract, the contractor shall discuss status, changes or issues with the HMMR as part of all technical reviews, ESOH WG meetings, and each Program Management Review.

C.4.11 Use of Government Owned or Furnished Property

C.4.11.1 The contractor is authorized to utilize Government-owned or Furnished Property provided under this contract for any task or purpose required to support STS activities or work directives. Use shall include shipment of Government property to contractor, subcontractor, Aberdeen Test Center (ATC), Yuma Test Center (YTC), or Camp Roberts, or other sites as indicated in WDs, required by the

Government. Use of Government property shall be on a non-interference basis and shall be at no additional cost to the Government.

6 27

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

C.4.11.2 Government assets intended for the production build shall not be redirected or loaned to STS activities without written concurrence from the PCO. Authorized use shall include the shipment of Government property to contractor, subcontractor, ATC, YTC, Camp

Roberts, or other locations.

C.4.11.3 Contractor Requisitions and Reporting Requirements for Government Furnished Material/Government Furnished Equipment (GFM/GFE)

C.4.11.3.1 All contractor requisitions must be processed through the Material Control Authority (MCA) office and shall include the NSNs and total quantities for each part listed in attachments to the contract. The contractor shall submit acknowledgement of receipt of material received, via e-mail message, to the supporting MCA office (TACOMMCA@conus.army.mil) on a monthly basis. The notification shall include the following information: NSN; unit of issue; quantity received; document number received; date material received.

C.4.12 Program Management

C.4.12.1 The contractor shall manage and report progress on assigned task orders under the STS Work Directives.

C.4.12.1.1 The contractor shall furnish supplies and services necessary to accomplish the effort described in this contract for modifications, changes, and/or improvements to the transmission system. Efforts shall include program management, logistics support, engineering, product assurance and field service support for the transmission.

C.4.12.1.2 Contract Status Report

The Contract Status Report (to be delivered IAW CDRL A006) shall provide monthly and cumulative to date Budget, Performance, and

Expenditure by WD. The report shall contain the following monthly cost and performance data per STS WBS and/or WD structure: Funding

PRON, CLIN, WD/WBS Description, WD Revision, contract Funding Amount, Actual Labor with Fee, Actual Material/ODC with Fee, Total Actual

Cost with billable actuals with fee, Percent spent, Future Purchase Order (PO) commitments, Open PO commitments, Estimate to Completion

(ETC), Estimate at Completion (EAC), Variance at Completion (VAC), Budgeted Hours, Actual Hours, and Period of Performance.

C.4.12.1.3 Service Contract Reporting (SCR)

Service contractor reporting of information is required in the SCR section in the System for Award Management (SAM) by 31 October, when a contract or task order has a total estimated value, including options, that exceeds $3 million; and is for services in the following acquisition portfolio groups.

1) Logistics management services

2) Equipment related services

3) Knowledge based services

4) Electronics and communications services

C.4.12.1.4 Engineering Management

The contractor shall provide engineering support to program management for STS-related activities including work directive management, planning, reporting, estimate and proposal preparation, attendance at meetings, and conducting STS Reviews.

C.4.12.1.5 Meetings

The contractor shall host, coordinate, and/or attend meetings as required by the Government. The contractor shall deliver minutes of meetings to all Government attendees providing an electronic address IAW CDRL A007.

C.4.12.1.6 Contract Performance Management

If any discrete Work Directive exceeds $20 million, the contractor shall establish, maintain and use an Earned Value Management System

(EVMS) in the performance of Work Directives and CDRL A008. If the $20 million threshold is not exceeded, the contractor shall provide a monthly Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) IAW awarded Work Directives, and CDRL A009.

C.4.12.1.6.1 Integrated Master Schedule (IMS)

The contractor shall prepare and deliver a THOR STS Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) for all WDs awarded under this contract IAW CDRL

A009. The contractor shall prepare the IMS IAW Integrated Master Schedule Preparation and Use Guide. The Integrated Master Schedule shall be structured IAW MIL-STD-881F.

All monthly submissions will include a written schedule analysis to identify, document and communicate changes of one (1) working day or greater to: the Project Critical Path, the next major milestone, and/or the Near Critical Path task/activity actual start and/or actual finish date variances from submission to submission. Work around and/or recovery schedules/plans, and associated impacts due to program changes shall also be provided. The schedule narrative shall address progress to date and discuss any significant schedule changes

7 27

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

(i.e., add/deleted tasks, any significant logic revisions, and any/all programmatic schedule assumption changes.).

C.4.12.1.6.2 Integrated Performance Management

When an Integrated Performance Management Data Report (IPMDAR) is required, the contractor shall develop and deliver a monthly

IPMDAR/Integrated Master Plan (IMP) IAW CDRL A008, the DoD Integrated Master Plan and Integrated Master Schedule Preparation and Use

Guide, and MIL-STD-881F Work Breakdown Structures for Defense Material Items. The contractor shall utilize an Earned Value Management

System (EVMS) as a project management tool to effectively integrate the project scope of work with cost, schedule, and performance elements for optimum project planning and control. To establish the integrated performance management system, the contractor shall ensure the EVMS is linked to, and supported by, the contractors management processes and systems to include the resource-loaded

Integrated Master Schedule (IMS), Contract Work Breakdown Structure (CWBS), change management, material management, procurement, cost estimating, and accounting. The contractor shall correlate and integrate these systems and processes to provide for early indication of cost and schedule problems, and their relation to technical achievement.

C.4.12.1.6.3 Integrated Program Management Data Analysis Report (IPMDAR)/Integrated Master Plan (IMP)

The contractor shall develop and deliver an IPMDAR IAW CDRL A008. The IPMDAR shall be delivered monthly containing the original baseline, performance data earned value, and actual costs IAW CDRL A008. The contractor shall use COBRA as a reporting tool. The contractor shall deliver electronic backup files of the IMS and Performance Measurement Baseline (PMB) on a monthly basis, in Microsoft

Project scheduling format and Deltek Cobra EVM format, including all auxiliary files (e.g., breakdown structures, code files, calendars, etc.) along with the IPMDAR/IMP IAW CDRL A008.

C.4.12.1.6.4 The IPMDAR shall be updated and delivered at the Control Account IAW CDRL A008. The IMS shall be updated and maintained in an IMP. The IMP is an event-based plan consisting of a hierarchy of program events, with each event being support by specific accomplishments, and each accomplishment reinforced by specific criteria that must be satisfied.

The IMS shall be coded with IMP activity codes. The contractor shall update and maintain an IMS by logically networking detailed program activities. The schedule shall be consistent with the Contract Work Breakdown Structure (CWBS) and contain the planned events and milestones, accomplishments, exit criteria, and activities from work directive award to completion of the work directive. The IMS and time-phasing of the PMB shall be consistent. The IMS shall be resource-loaded and clearly identify critical path activities. All IMS monthly submissions shall include written schedule analysis.

C.4.12.1.6.5 Earned Value Management System (EVMS)

The contractor shall use an EVMS that complies with the EVMS guidelines in DoD 5000.02, Defense Acquisition Guidebook, the ANSI/EIA-748, and the contractors own documented System Description. EVM shall be used as a tool to identify and track program risks, manage cost, schedule, and technical performance.

C.4.12.1.6.6 Application to Subcontractors

The contractor shall flow-down EVMS requirements to subcontractors exceeding $20 million. Flow-down of the requirements to subcontractors of less than $20 million then-year dollars is a risk-based decision and will be as mutually agreed upon between the contractor and the Government. The performance information reported by the subcontractors shall be incorporated and integrated in the contractors management system. The contractor shall be responsible for reviewing and assuring the validity of all subcontractors reporting through surveillance and other means.

C.4.12.1.6.7 Over-Target Baseline (OTB) or Over-Target Schedule (OTS)

In exceptional circumstances indicated by contract performance (per the contractors EVMS System Description), the contractor shall submit a request for approval to initiate an over-target baseline or over-target schedule to the PCO. The request shall include a top-level projection of cost and schedule growth, a recommendation of whether or not performance variances shall be retained on record, and a schedule for implementing a new baseline. The contractor shall not implement the OTB or OTS restructuring prior to receiving written approval from the PCO.

C.4.12.1.6.7.1 Incorporation of Baseline Changes

The PMB shall be updated with any required work packages upon receipt of the modification implementing the change. Changes shall be incorporated IAW the contractors EVMS System Description.

C.4.12.1.6.7.2 Current Period and Retroactive Changes

The contractor shall use American National Standards Institute/Electronic Industries Alliance Standard (ANSI/EIA) 748 and the approved

System Description in complying with changes. Current period or retroactive changes will be approved by the COR.

C.4.12.1.6.7.3 Baseline Changes

8 27

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

The contractor shall identify, with supporting rationale, any deviations or changes to the program baseline, and review all program plans, activities, and work products for consistency with the baseline requirements and any approved changes made to them. The contractor shall document all changes, including those to be made to the plans and work products resulting from changes to the requirements baseline. The contractor shall initiate and complete corrective action for all inconsistencies reported on the IPMDAR (CDRL

A008).

C.4.12.1.6.8 Integrated Baseline Review (IBR)

The contractor shall conduct a joint assessment with the Government of the Performance Measurement Baseline (PMB) to verify the baselines realism, accuracy, and technical content. The IBR shall take place at the contractors facility within 180 calendar days of applicable WD award with a Period of Performance longer than 180 calendar days. The contractor shall provide access to all pertinent records and data requested by the PCO, or other authorized Government representative to adequately prepare for the IBR (to include the detailed time-phased PMB, Responsibility Assignment Matrix, Earned Value Criteria, Control Account Authorizations, and Work Package

Authorizations) and permit Government surveillance to ensure EVMS compliance. The contractor shall detail-plan the PMB to MIL-STD-881F, Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) Level III. Two weeks prior to the IBR, the contractor shall provide the Government Control Account

Managers (CAM) with a read-ahead copy of the topics it will cover at the IBR, focusing on its assigned WBS elements. The contractor shall deliver and present a 12-month rolling wave detailed IMS plan, IAW CDRL A009, at the IBR. The Government has the right to accept or reject the detailed IMS and PMB plan. In the event that the Government rejects the detailed IMS and PMB plan, it will work with the contractor to adjust the plan.

C.4.13 Integrated Logistics Support (ILS)

C.4.13.1 ILS Program

The contractor shall plan, manage, and execute an ILS Program IAW AR 700-127 Chapter 5, Section 3.

C.4.13.1.1 ILS Program Objectives

The contractor shall conduct an effective LSA program that:

1. Ensures the supportability characteristics for the transmission identified under THOR are satisfied and demonstrated.

2. Effectively translates the design of the transmission into validated logistics support package products.

3. Focuses on the development of a validated logistics support package that maintains currency with the transmission configuration.

4. Provides effective test support by developing and managing system support packages for testing under this contract.

5. Maintains facility vehicles to ensure they are available and in the current configuration and condition to support the logistics activities required for their use under this contract.

C.5 ILS Program Management

The contractor shall establish and maintain the management processes and controls for the ILS program. A joint Government/contractor

Product Support Integrated Product Team (PS-IPT) shall be established to oversee the THOR ILS program.

C.5.1 ILS Master Schedule

The contractor shall develop and maintain an ILS Schedule to manage the ILS program through completion of this contract, delivered IAW

CDRL A009. The ILS schedule shall reflect the details of the ILS work contents per WD requirements and incorporate the schedule into the

THOR program IMS. The schedule shall be agreed upon and updated with the Government during PS-IPTs.

C.5.2 Logistics Support Analysis (LSA)/Logistics Management Information (LMI) Objectives

The contractor shall perform LSA of the transmission to ensure it meets or exceeds the supportability requirements of the current transmission configuration. The contractor shall make maximum use of LSA/LMI data developed under previous Government contracts and maintain an ILS design change tracking system which provides logistics tracking data, to include the estimated cost to implement proposed design changes and the authority directing the change. The contractor shall ensure LSA/LMI data is available to develop, validate and provide a logistics support package for the transmission configuration used during testing, training or other demonstrations or evaluations required by this contract.

C.5.2.1 LSA Tasks

The contractor shall perform the following LSA efforts as stated in sections C.5.2.1.1 through C.5.2.1.4.1.

C.5.2.1.1 Supportability Design Factors

The contractor shall develop and maintain the following design related supportability parameter functions for the transmission.

9 27

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

C.5.2.1.1.1 RAM Input

The contractor shall leverage the results of the RAM Analysis, including the Failure Mode, Effects and Criticality Analysis (FMECA) to initially develop or update LMI maintenance task frequencies, parts replacement rates, troubleshooting and diagnostic symptoms and procedures, maintenance times, reliability centered maintenance based scheduled and unscheduled maintenance task determination, and essentiality determinations.

C.5.2.1.2 Logistics Analysis

The contractor shall develop and update the existing Operator and Maintenance Task Lists to reflect the current product baseline. The contractor shall also perform the following analysis efforts IAW the approved ILS Schedule.

C.5.2.1.2.1 Supportability Analysis

The contractor shall prepare an assessment of supportability for the transmission design. Supportability considerations will be based on the current product configuration. The contractor shall assess the adequacy of the design from the repairable item level through the system level. The contractor shall provide its assessments at PS-IPT meetings and LMI reviews. The contractor shall identify any shortcomings in the design in the LMI data base and present them at LMI reviews, PS-IPT meetings, configuration audits, engineering reviews and program reviews. The contractor shall provide recommendations and corrective action plans based on their assessment and system specification requirements during PS-IPT meetings.

C.5.2.1.2.2 Army Oil Analysis Program (AOAP)

The contractor shall analyze the transmission, leveraging data developed under previous Government contracts if applicable, to determine the effect on current AOAP information required by individual WD. The contractor shall recommend changes to the current AOAP information required to support the transmission during PS-IPT meetings.

C.5.2.1.3 Testability

The contractor shall use MIL-HDBK-2165 to implement the necessary testability tasks and activities to achieve Fault Detection and

Isolation, Built in Test (BIT), and Built in Test Equipment (BITE) requirements. The contractor shall also request current Test Program

Set (TPS) guidance from the Program Management Office prior to the development or update of TPSs.

C.5.2.1.3.1 Testability tasks

The contractor shall develop, or update and implement the necessary testability tasks and activities to meet the Transmission

Performance Specifications. The contractor shall do so in order to minimize the system downtime required for diagnostics and troubleshooting. The contractor shall do so by ensuring adequate test points are integrated into the system, thereby minimizing TPS test and fault detection time, and overall fault isolation performance.

C.5.2.1.4 Task Analysis Performance Objective

The contractor shall conduct the task analysis for the transmission. The analysis shall mirror the product configuration baseline in LMI in order to facilitate development of the logistics support package. The contractor shall tailor the analysis so that each logistics product is based upon the appropriate LMI baseline. The contractor shall deliver the Task analysis documentation to the Government as a part of the overall LMI submissions IAW CDRL A010.

C.5.2.1.4.1 Maintenance Task Analysis

The contractor shall conduct Maintenance Planning and Supportability Analyses in order to develop logistics products based on the Armys two- level maintenance policies IAW AR 750-1 (Ch 3) and AR 700-127 (Ch 5). The contractor shall use SAE-GEIA STD 0007 Rev C in identifying content, format, delivery and related guidance for logistics data.

C.5.2.1.4.1.1 Maintenance Task Analysis Baselines

The contractor shall update the LMI baseline for the transmission based upon a maintenance task analysis. The maintenance task analysis shall reflect the transmission baseline. The baseline shall reflect the results of the latest RAM, safety, health hazards and human factors engineering analyses. The contractor shall tailor the task analysis to meet the requirements of LMI and the resulting logistics support package under this contract. The contractor shall update the maintenance task analysis to reflect the results of testing, training, quality, manufacturing and other evaluations. In performance of maintenance task analysis, the contractor shall:

1. Develop and maintain sequential narrative instructions or procedural source material for all tasks below depot level maintenance including: (1) maintenance source data for TMs and (2) Interactive Electronic Technical Manuals (IETM).

10 27

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

2. Identify all support requirements for performing each task. These shall include Military Occupational Specialty (MOS), skill levels, tools, support equipment, ATE, TPSs, and repair parts. As a result of the maintenance analysis, recommend repair parts and special tool requirements, technical manuals, kits, tools or other equipment.

3. Develop the quantitative assessment of each maintenance task, RAM analysis and test, to develop task frequencies, quantities of support items required for each task, and maintenance times for each duty position and the overall task. Based upon the examination of each repairable assembly, use maintainability Design Criteria information in MIL-HDBK-470Ato assess the supportability of the design.

C.5.2.1.4.1.2 Level of Repair Analysis (LORA)

The contractor shall perform LORA for new transmission items based on Army two-level maintenance policies, using the Army approved model

(Computerized Optimization Model for Predicting and Analyzing Support Structures (COMPASS)). The contractor shall leverage the LORA analyses for other items or systems managed by the Government to perform the LORA for the transmission. The Maintenance task list that is based upon this LORA shall be presented at LMI reviews. The contractor shall prepare and deliver a current LORA report (CDRL A011) that addresses both new and existing items at the reviews. The LORA will be used to support final decisions on the transmission maintenance plan.

C.5.2.1.4.2 Operator and Maintainer Task Analysis

The contractor shall provide recommended updates for the operator and maintenance task lists for the transmission with sufficient details for operator technical manual information, both embedded and standalone. The task inventory for each operator position will include the identification of which tasks and predecessor skills are required to be trained.

C.5.2.1.5 Provisioning Plan and Analysis

The contractor shall identify, as a part of maintenance task analysis, all support items required to support the system. The contractor shall prepare a provisioning plan for those items that are not currently available through the DoD supply system. For those support items that are currently available through the DoD supply system, the contractor shall prepare and present this information during critical design reviews (CDR).

C.5.2.2 Logistics Management Information (LMI)

The contractor shall generate LSA data and document this data in the LMI IAW SAE-GEIA STD 0007 Rev C. The contractor shall deliver the

LMI IAW CDRL A012. The contractor shall maintain an automated LMI data processing system which is compatible with Logistics

Modernization Program (LMP). The contractor's data processing system shall be capable of producing the LMI output summaries specified in

SAE-GEIA STD 0007 Rev C.

C.5.2.2.1 Manpower, Personnel and Training Requirements

Task lists by Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) to include the identification of those tasks that need to be trained at the institution, for transition, and sustainment. Task lists shall include frequency, times, skills and other key information to support:

C.5.2.2.1.1 Quantitative and Qualitative Personnel Requirements Information (QQPRI), Manpower Allocation Requirements Criteria (MARC) and Manpower Estimate Report (MER) Input

The contractor shall utilize AR 611-1, and current Modification Table of Organization and Equipment (MTOE) provided as GFI, to support the assessment of skills for each operator and maintenance task. Any new MOS or skills required to operate or maintain the transmission shall be identified to the Supportability Integrated Product Team (SIPT) as soon as the assessment is completed.

C.5.2.3 Supply Support Lists

The contractor shall establish and maintain support item lists that identify the specific support item, at which level it is utilized or authorized for use. The contractor shall maintain the statistics from these lists (e.g. number of repair parts, number of repairables, number of special tools, number of repair parts without NSNs) and present the statistics at SIPT meetings. These lists and statistics shall include:

a. The contractor shall provide recommended Authorized Stockage List (ASL) for the transmission.

b. The contractor shall prepare and deliver the Repair Parts Tools List (RPSTL) source material required for maintaining the transmission.

C.5.3 Technical Manuals (TMs), National Maintenance Work Requirement (NMWR), Modification Work Orders (MWOs)

C.5.3.1 TM / NMWR / MWO Program Objectives

11 27

Name of Offeror or Contractor:

PIIN/SIIN MOD/AMD

The objective of the transmission technical publication program is to develop and validate transmission publications. The contractor shall ensure that all TM data delivered matches the configuration of the transmission. The contractor shall prepare and validate the technical publications as:

1. Redlined work packages or pages of applicable vehicle (Bradley, PIM, AMPV, and MLRS) Operator Manuals IAW MIL-STD-40051-2D, TM

Requirements Matrix Table A-II required by applicable WD.

2. Redlined pages of applicable vehicle (Bradley, PIM, AMPV, and MLRS) Operator Manual-HR IAW MIL PRF 32436.

3. Redlined work packages or pages of applicable vehicle (Bradley, PIM, AMPV, and MLRS) Operator and Field Maintenance Manual, including

RPSTL, IETM IAW MIL-STD-40051-2D.

4. Change packages or Revisions of NMWR 9-2520-281 to reflect current transmission LSA/LMI.

C.5.3.2 Publications Development and Delivery

C.5.3.2.1 The contractor shall develop and deliver the TM and NMWR source data developed under the Two-Level Maintenance (TLM) philosophy based on the LSA and resulting LMI IAW CDRLs A013, A014, and A015. The contractor shall develop procedures in the same sequential order as the Government approved two-level MAC. The contractor shall comply with the specifications, standards and guidelines for the development of the Transmission Publications.

C.5.3.2.2 The contractor shall brief for approval, either at the PS-IPT or TM IPR, the most effective diagnostic strategy (e.g. symptom based, system based, BIT/FIT based, logistic trees, fault tables) for presenting system troubleshooting information in the TMs. Embedded diagnostics are subject to software development and test, not TM specifications. However, diagnostics, including those embedded in the vehicle, shall be reviewed for effectiveness by User Representatives.

C.5.3.2.3 The contractor shall provide all personnel, equipment, tools, materials, supervision, and non-personal services necessary to develop source material for the publications as defined in this SOW.

C.5.3.2.4 During PS-IPT meetings the contractor shall deliver to the Government with a TM / NMWR Development Schedule and Status Reports that align with the ILS master schedule IAW CDRL A009.

C.5.3.3 Technical Publications Validations

C.5.3.3.1 The contractor shall deliver a validation plan IAW CDRL A016. The contractor shall inform the Government of its planned validation schedule, start date, time, and location of validation 30 days prior to start of the Validation. The contractor shall notify the Government of the contractor Validation Plan certifying that each equipment publication under this contract shall be 100% validated

IAW the requirements of this contract ensuring that the content therein is complete and technically accurate. If the Government determines that the Validation Plan will not endure technical accuracy and adequacy of all TM deliverables, the contractor will be required to re-validate the procedures to the satisfaction of the Government at no additional cost until it can ensure that validation efforts will result in an acceptable level of quality assurance.

C.5.3.3.2 The contractor shall validate all technical and equipment publication source material 100%, to ensure completeness, accuracy, usability, and adequacy of content against the related system or equipment. The contractor shall validate troubleshooting procedures to the extent possible without damaging equipment. The contractor shall capture those maintenance tasks that can cause damage as a part of any repairs performed for production, quality or vehicle testing.