W912BV19R0003_0001_SF30.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this Amendment 0001, is to make changes to section 00 22 11 and provide updates to specifications and draw ings.

All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

1 2

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street , County, State and Zip Code) X W912BV19R0003

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

18-Apr-2019

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO.

5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

17-May-2019

CODE

CONTRACTING DIV

US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, TULSA DISTRICT

2488 E. 81ST STREET

TULSA OK 74137-4290

W912BV 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W912BV19R0003

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

(End of Summary of Changes)

SUMMARY OF CHANGES (SPECIFICATIONS AND DRAWINGS)

AMENDMENT #0001

RFP NO. W912BV19R0003

Rehab Draft Tube Gates, Intake Bulkheads, and Intake Gates

ROBERT S. KERR POWERHOUSE

LEFLORE COUNTY, OKLAHOMA

Standard Form (SF) 30, Block 14 (continuation):

The proposal documents shall be revised as follows:

Section 00 22 11 - See attached section for changes

SPECIFICATIONS

Section 00 11 00 replaced in its entirety. Section

01 00 00 replaced in its entirety. Submittal

Register replaced in its entirety. Section 01 45

00 replaced in its entirety. Section 05 05 23.16 replaced in its entirety. Section 05 50 15 replaced in its entirety. Section 05 59 13 replaced in its entirety. DRAWINGS

None.

END OF SUMMARY OF CHANGES (SPECIFICATIONS AND DRAWINGS) – AMENDMENT #0001

SECTION 00 22 11

PROPOSAL PREPARATION AND EVALUATION CRITERIA

PART I -- PROPOSAL INSTRUCTIONS

1. PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS AND INSTRUCTIONS

a. REQUIREMENT FOR SEPARATE PRICE AND TECHNICAL PROPOSALS.

(1) Each Offeror must submit both a Price Proposal and a Technical Proposal. The Price Proposal and the

Technical Proposal must be submitted as separate PDF files. Ensure that each separate file is clearly marked to indicate its contents; and the identity of the Offeror.

(2) Both the Price Proposal and the Technical Proposal must be received by the closing date and time set for receipt of proposals.

(3) No dollar amounts from the Price Proposal are to be included in the Technical Proposal.

(4) All information intended to be evaluated as part of the Technical Proposal must be submitted as part of the

Technical Proposal. Do not merely cross-reference similar material in the Price Proposal, or vice versa. Also, do not include links to websites in lieu of incorporating information into your proposal.

(5) Do not include exceptions or deviations to the terms and conditions of the solicitation in either the technical or price proposal. Should the offer include any standard company terms and conditions that conflict with the terms and conditions of the solicitation, the offer may be determined "unacceptable" and thus ineligible for award. Should the offeror have any questions related to specific terms and conditions, these should be resolved prior to submission of the offer. If the Offeror must make any assumptions prior to submitting the proposal, the

Offeror shall list and describe in detail the assumptions on the first page of each Tab. All assumptions shall be fully supported with the Offeror’s rationale and shall fully explain the impact, if any, on the performance and/or specific requirement of the RFP. The Offeror shall clearly describe on the Proposal Cover Sheet submitted with the Price

Proposal any assumption to the contractual and/or technical terms and include the monetary impact on the solicitation with the price proposal. Proposal exceptions/deviations will not be considered a part of the contract after award unless specifically approved by the Contracting Officer in writing at the time of contract award.

b. DISCUSSIONS. The Government does not intend to enter into discussions with offerors prior to making an award. Offerors are encouraged to present their best technical proposal and prices in their initial proposal submission.

However, in accordance with FAR Part 15.306, should discussions become necessary, the Government reserves the right to hold them. If this occurs, a competitive range will be determined and offerors notified. The competitive range may be limited for purposes of efficiency in accordance with (IAW) FAR Part 15.306(c)(2).

c. COST OR PRICING DATA. Offerors are not required to submit Cost or Pricing Data with their offers.

However, if deemed necessary, supplemental price breakdown information will be used to assist the Government in performing the price evaluation. This will not be requested until after the initial proposal submission.

d. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS.

(1) Submit only the electronic files specifically authorized and/or required elsewhere in this section. Do not submit excess information, to include audio-visual materials, electronic media, etc.

(2) Proposal materials shall be submitted in electronic format as shown below (see paragraph entitled

“Electronic Format”). Electronic proposals shall be tabbed and labeled in a manner to afford easy identification from a Table of Contents. Font size shall not be less than 10 point. Do not use condensed font. Each page shall be identified with the appropriate page number centered at the bottom of the page. Sheet size of the proposal contents shall be 8-1/2 inches x 11 inches where sheets are prepared specifically for this proposal; however, if drawings, charts, or other graphics are submitted, sheets no larger than 11 inches x 17 inches shall be used. Eleven-by-seventeen

(11 x 17) inch sheets will be counted as two 8-1/2 inch x 11 inch sheets. Technical and Price Proposals shall be provided as separate files. The Price Proposal file shall be named “Price Proposal”. The Government will not review any information submitted in an appendix or attachment to the proposal. The Offeror shall not submit verbatim sections of this solicitation as part of their proposal. Offers that do not meet these requirements may be subject to rejection.

(3) Electronic Format: The Offeror shall provide the complete proposal to the Contract Specialist via

AMRDEC SAFE only in accordance with the instructions contained in the letter issued with this Task Order. Provide the Price Proposal as a separate file. The electronic proposal file shall contain the entire proposal (excluding the Price

Proposal) in .pdf format using Adobe Acrobat software to print to a .pdf file; do not scan or copy the documents into a

.pdf file. The text portion of the proposal shall be contained as a single .pdf file. The file must be “searchable”. Sections of the proposal shall be linked to the index in logical order.

(4) “Confidential” projects cannot be submitted to demonstrate capability unless all of the information required for evaluation as specified herein can be provided to the Government as part of the Offeror’s technical proposal. Offerors that include in their proposals information that they do not want disclosed to the public for any purpose, or used by the Government except for evaluation purposes, must be clearly marked in accordance with the instructions at FAR 52.215-1, “Instructions to Offerors—Competitive Acquisition”, paragraph (e), “Restriction on disclosure and use of data”.

(5) For submissions with page limitations, the pages will be counted as follows: One side of the paper is one page; information on both the back and front of one sheet of paper will be counted as two pages. Where authorized, fold-out pages (11" x 14" or 11" x 17") will count as two pages. Pages furnished for organizational purposes only, such as a “Table of Contents” or divider tabs, are not included in the page limitation.

(6) Proposal revisions shall be submitted as page replacements with revised text readily identifiable, e.g., bold face print or underlining. The source of the revision, e.g., Error, Omission, or Clarification, or amendment shall be included and be annotated for each revision. Proposal replacement pages shall be numbered, shall be clearly marked

“REVISED”, shall show the date of revision, shall be submitted in appropriate via AMRDEC SAFE with the entire proposal revised and complete.

e. SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE PRICE PROPOSAL

(1) Price Proposal. Submit the Price Proposal in electronic format in accordance with paragraph 1.d.(3) above.

(2) Size Restrictions and Page Limits. Use only 8 ½” x 11” pages. There are no page limits set for the price proposal. However, limit your response to information required by this solicitation. Excess information will not be considered in the Government’s evaluation. Do not use a font size smaller than 10, an unusual font style such as script, or condensed print for any submission.

(3) Format and Contents of the Price Proposal and List of Tabs. The Price Proposal shall be appropriately labeled as such and shall be organized as indicated in the following chart. Note: If the Offeror is not required to submit any information under a listed Tab in accordance with the instructions below, that tab can be omitted. However, do not renumber the subsequent tabs.

TAB

CONTENTS OF THE PRICE PROPOSAL (VOLUME 1)

#1

The Proposal Cover Sheet

#2

Signed Letter Responding to RFP and Acknowledgement of Amendments

#3

CLIN Schedule

#4

Bid Guarantee (Bid Bond)

(4) Detailed Submission Instructions for the Price Proposal

(a) TAB 1: The proposal cover sheet is required by FAR 52.215-1(2) (c) (i)-(v) and must be submitted by all offerors. This provision, titled “Instructions to Offerors—Competitive Acquisition,” and the format for the proposal cover sheet as shown here:

PROPOSAL COVER SHEET

1. Solicitation Number:

2. The name, address, and telephone and facsimile numbers of the Offeror

(and electronic address if available):

3. Names, titles, and telephone and facsimile numbers (and electronic addresses if available) of persons authorized to negotiate on the Offeror’s behalf with the Government in connection with this solicitation:

4. Name, title, and signature of person authorized to sign the proposal. Proposals signed by an agent shall be accompanied by evidence of that agent’s authority, unless that evidence has been previously furnished to the issuing office.

5. Tax Identification number of Offeror.

(b) TAB 2: The Letter provided to respond to this Request for Proposal is to be completed by all

Offerors and duly executed with an original signature by an official authorized to bind the company in accordance with

FAR 4.102. All amendments must be acknowledged by all Offerors in accordance with the instructions on the Standard

Form 30, Amendment of Solicitation.

(c) TAB 3: Section 00 11 00, CLIN Schedule is to be completed in its entirety by all Offerors. See

Section 00 11 00 with attached notes, for further instructions.

(d) TAB 4: Provide a fully executed Bid Bond as required by FAR Clause 52.228-1, Bid Guarantee.

f. SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

(1) Number of Sets of the Technical Proposal. Submit the Technical Proposal in accordance with paragraph

1.d.(3) above.

(2) Format and Contents of the Technical Proposal and List of Tabs. The technical proposal will be appropriately labeled as such. Each set shall be organized using the PDF bookmarks specified in the following chart.

Bookmarks are to be visible immediately after opening.

CONTENTS OF THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL (VOLUME 2)

LOCATION FACTOR

NUMBER

DESCRIPTION

TAB 1

Factor #1

RELEVANT SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE

TAB 2

Factor #2

KEY SUBCONTRACTORS & KEY PERSONNEL

TAB 3

Factor #3

PAST PERFORMANCE

(3) Page Limitations. The following page limitations are established for each factor described above:

(a) Factor #1, Relevant Specialized Experience – Limited to 10 pages (a maximum of 5 forms)

(b) Factor #2, Key Subcontractors & Key Personnel – Limited to two (2) pages for each resume provided

(c) Factor #3, Past Performance – No page limitation

Tables of content, proposal cover letters, and tabs between proposal information do not count toward any page limitations in the proposal.

(4) Detailed Submission Requirements for the Technical Proposal. The following is a detailed description of the information to be submitted under each TAB.

(a) TAB 1: FACTOR 1, RELEVANT SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE:

Demonstrate the experience of the offeror and/or proposed team, including sub-contractors, on projects same/similar to that described in the solicitation for same/similar construction services. If using subcontractors as part of the proposed team to demonstrate experience, describe the role they will play in this project and the percentage of work they will perform.

The Offeror shall complete a minimum of four (4) three, “Experience Information” forms, attached at the end of this section, in response to this factor. All blocks must be filled in and all data should be accurate, current, and complete. All projects submitted must be at least 50% complete and completed within the last 10 years. At least two (2) of the projects provided must be valued at over $1,000,000 500.000. For evaluation purposes, “similar” is defined as regularly engaged in the rehab of large (100 Tons or greater) overhead bridge cranes manufacturing of hydraulic steel structures.

This factor is designed to verify the experience of the offeror having been regularly engaged in the rehab of such systems. Particular emphasis should be placed on demonstrating experience in the analysis and load testing of existing cranes.

Project submittal information should clearly illustrate experience in overhead bridge cranes rehab, capacity up-rates and load testing for bridge cranes 100 tons and above manufacturing of hydraulic steel structures. If more than four three projects are submitted, only the first four three listed in the proposal will be evaluated. Each project cited shall be at least $500, 000 250,000 in construction cost and have been completed within ten (10) years from the date that the proposal for this project is due. Only those projects for which the offeror was the prime contractor should be submitted. The government preference is that project examples submitted be of completed projects (i.e. construction complete). Each project summary must include the following for each project: a description of the project; scope; location;

firms on the proposed team that constructed the project; construction contract award amount and final construction cost;

the original contract finish date and actual finish date (if finished). Narratives of each project should include a brief overview of each project and its relevance to this project. All summaries should also contain the name, address, telephone, e-mail, and fax number of a representative of the customer and an alternate individual not affiliated with the proposer and familiar with the proposer’s experience on the project and can verify the experience cited.

If any of the information required is not included in the form then the Offeror will be considered non-responsive and evaluated as unacceptable.

(b) TAB 2: FACTOR 2, KEY SUBCONTRACTORS & KEY PERSONNEL:

By naming these firms and personnel, the Offeror is making a commitment that barring unforeseen circumstances, they are the firms and personnel that will be working on this project. Any substitutions shall be approved by the Contracting

Officer. All key personnel and subcontractor personnel working on this project must be U.S. citizens or documented

U.S. workers and must be able to provide proof of U.S. citizenship or other authorized documentation.

(1) Key Subcontractors: Identify the potential Key Subcontractors chosen for manufacturing, welding, painting, and fitting, describing the extent of their involvement in the project. Submit no more than five

Specialized Experience forms (Attachment 1) for each Key Subcontractor. Subcontractors shall be selected from the list of potential subcontractors.

(2) Key Personnel: The Offeror must provide resume data for the following key construction personnel: Project Manager (if applicable), Project Scheduler, Quality Control Manager, and Site Superintendent, Site

Safety and Health Officer (SSHO). Minimum qualifications for the Project Manager, Construction site superintendent and Contractor Quality Control (CQC) System Manager shall be as required by Section 01 45 00.00 00 QUALITY

CONTROL. SSHO minimum requirements shall be as shown in Section 01 35 26.00 00 GOVERNMENTAL SAFETY

REQUIREMENTS.

Resume information to be provided shall be limited to no more than two (2) pages per person and shall include the following information as a minimum:

(i) Name and title

(ii) Project assignment

(iii) Name of firm with which associated

(iv) Years of experience with this firm and with other firms

(v) Education degree(s), year, specialization, if applicable

(vi) Active professional registration, year first registered, if applicable

(vii) Other experience and qualifications relevant to same/similar work required under this contract

(c) TAB 3: FACTOR 3, PAST PERFORMANCE:

For each project submitted, Offerors shall submit available performance documentation. If no performance documentation is available, state so on the project information worksheet. The Government will review the experience forms submitted as well as query the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (to include ACASS, CCASS, and CPARS) to validate past performance ratings on Department of Defense contracts and any other past performance information the Government deems necessary to evaluate a contractor’s past performance. Firms without a history of past performance will be given a neutral rating. For non-Corps of Engineers contracts, provide a copy of the performance rating issued by the contracting agent.

For each project that does not have a final ACASS, CCASS, or CPARS evaluation, Offerors shall provide a questionnaire (See Attachment 2) to the point of contact, clearly identifying the project to be evaluated. A sample Past

Performance Evaluation Questionnaire is included at the end of this section. When completed, these forms shall be mailed, faxed or e-mailed to the Tulsa District Contract Specialist identified in the RFP letter prior to proposal closing date. It is the contractor’s responsibility to ensure that the reference documentation is provided, as the Government may not make additional requests for past performance information from the references. The evaluation form shall be provided to the Contract Specialist directly from the reference.

The information contained in the questionnaires will be used to evaluate the offeror’s past performance. If any negative past performance information is received, the contractor will be given an opportunity to provide rebuttal. Each contractor shall provide at least three (3) past performance ratings. Any rating an offeror has in ACASS, CCASS, and

CPARS for the projects listed under Factor 1 will count toward this requirement. The offeror is responsible for ensuring that the KO has received a minimum of three (3) questionnaires prior to that date/time or has provided written notification to the KO that they have current ratings in ACASS, CCASS, and CPARS. Entities that have no past customers shall notify the KO in writing, prior to the date and time established for the RFP closing, that they have had no previous clients and that the minimum number of questionnaires cannot be provided. It is the contractor’s responsibility to ensure that the reference documentation is provided, as the Government may not make additional requests for past performance information from the references. The evaluation form shall be provided to the

Contract Specialist directly from the reference. Do not request past performance questionnaires on projects that have final ACASS, CCASS, or CPARS evaluations. If a past performance questionnaire is received on a project where a final ACASS, CCASS, or CPARS evaluation exists, the ACASS, CCASS, or CPARS evaluation will serve as the official rating of record for evaluation purposes.

The Government may contact references provided as part of Factor 1 – Relevant Specialized Experience for Task

Orders, for information regarding the offeror’s past performance on the project and for the purposes of assessing and verifying the scope of the work performed. Offerors should provide accurate, current, and complete contact information for references provided in the project descriptions. The Government may review any other sources of information for evaluating past performance. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), using all CAGE/DUNS numbers of team members (partnership, joint venture, teaming arrangement, or parent company/subsidiary/affiliate) identified in the offeror’s proposal, inquiries of owner representative(s), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information

System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (ESRS), and any other sources not provided by the offeror.

Part II. EVALUATION OF OFFEROR PROPOSALS

2. SOURCE SELECTION USING THE LOW-PRICED, TECHNICALLY ACCEPTABLE PROCESS. An evaluation for acceptability will be performed on the low price proposal in accordance with FAR 15.101-2(b)(3). The proposal that provides the lowest overall price and is otherwise technically acceptable in all factors will be selected for award. To be considered technically acceptable, no technical factor in the proposal may be determined to be unacceptable. The failure of a proposal to meet any of the factors will result in a technically unacceptable rating and preclude award.

2.1 BASIS OF AWARD. Award will be made on the basis of the lowest evaluated price of proposals meeting or exceeding the acceptability standards for non-cost factors of the base proposal. Tradeoffs are not permitted. Proposals will be evaluated for acceptability but not ranked using non-cost/price factors.

2.2 FACTOR 4 - EVALUATION OF THE PRICE PROPOSALS

a. Price will be evaluated and considered but will not be scored or combined with other aspects of the proposal evaluation. The proposed prices will be analyzed for reasonableness. They may also be analyzed to determine whether they are realistic for the work to be performed, reflect a clear understanding of the requirements, and are consistent with the information provided by the Offeror. Additionally, all offers will be analyzed for unbalanced pricing in accordance with FAR 15.404-1(g) and may be rejected if it is determined that the lack of balance poses an unacceptable risk to the

Government.

b. The otherwise technically-acceptable, lowest-priced offeror may be required to confirm its price on either a

CLIN, element, or total price basis, and/or provide additional information in support of their price, prior to contract award at the Government’s request and discretion.

2.3 EVALUATION OF THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL. Each Technical Proposal will be evaluated based on the following evaluation criteria:

a. FACTOR 1: RELEVANT SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE: The Government will review the experience of the contractor on projects and key personnel provided in response to Factor 1. Offerors must meet all of the following minimum acceptability standards to receive an “ACCEPTABLE” on this factor:

(1) Proposed team must have at least four (4) three (3) projects that are same/similar to that of the work found in this solicitation; AND

(2) At least two (2) of the projects submitted must be valued at over $500,000.00, and they must have been at least

50% complete within the last 10 years.

Failure to demonstrate the minimally acceptability standards under this factor will result in a “Non-Acceptable” rating and possible elimination from further consideration for contract award.

b. FACTOR 2: KEY SUBCONTRACTORS AND KEY PERSONNEL: The Government will review the resumes provided in response to Factor 2. Offerors must demonstrate all of the following minimum acceptability standards to receive an “Acceptable” on this factor.

The offeror must demonstrate in all resumes that the key personnel proposed have:

(1) A minimum experience as required by the specified sections (see Section 01 45 00.00 00 QUALITY

CONTROL and Section 01 35 26.00 00 GOVERNMENTAL SAFETY REQUIREMENTS). If none is specified, all personnel shall have a minimum of 5 year specialized experience in their field; AND

(2) Experience on projects same/similar to the work in this solicitation working in the position they are assigned to under this contract.

Failure to demonstrate the minimally acceptability standards under this factor will result in a “Non- Acceptable” rating and possible elimination from further consideration for contract award.

c. FACTOR 3: PAST PERFORMANCE:

The Government will review the experience forms submitted as well as all CPARS, ACASS, CCASS evaluations regardless of project and past performance questionnaires for projects submitted under Factor 1. The Government may contact points of contacts listed on the “Experience Information” forms submitted under Factor 1. Offerors must demonstrate the following minimum acceptability standards:

Any identified element or overall rating that is LESS than MARGINAL for past performance in the last 3 years OR for any project submitted under Factor 1, shall result in an 'Unacceptable' rating and elimination from further consideration for contract award.

In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iv)). Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability “Unknown” shall be considered “acceptable”

3. GENERAL TECHNICAL CRITERIA

a. Material omission(s) may cause the technical proposal to be rejected as unacceptable.

b. Proposals which are generic, vague, or lacking in detail may be considered unacceptable. The offeror’s failure to include information that the Government has indicated should be included may result in the proposal being found deficient if inadequate detail is provided.

c. The Government cannot make award based on a deficient offer. Therefore, receipt of a “Non-Acceptable” determination of acceptability for any factor will make the offer ineligible for award, unless the Government elects to enter into discussions with that Offeror and all deficiencies are remedied in a revised proposal. Note: It is the

Government’s intent to award without discussions.

d. If awarded the contract, the Contractor shall construct the project in accordance with the plans and specifications issued with this RFP.

ATTACHMENT 1

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE INFORMATION

(To be completed by Contractor)

1. Contract/Task Order Number:

Include Brief Explanation for Block 4 discussing reasons for time growth as necessary:

2. Contractor Name:

Address:

3. Contract Award Value:

4. Contract/TO /PO Status: Active Complete

Original Contract Completion Date:

Actual Completion Date :

Liquidated Damages Assessed(Y/N) :

(if yes, state $ amount)

5. Project Title:

Location:

6. Project Description-- to include the role of the contractor on the project and specific responsibilities of the contractor in performance of the effort and a brief overview of relevance to this project:

7. Project Owner or Project Manager for the Client – provide:

Name:

Address:

Telephone Number and E-mail:

SECTION 00 22 00 - ATTACHMENT 2

NAVFAC/USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ-0)

CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)

1. Contractor Information Firm Name: CAGE Code:

Address: DUNs Number:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:

2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain) Percent of project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):

3. Contract Information Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please specify):

Contract Title:

Contract Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Explain Differences:

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):

Explain Differences:

4. Project Description:

Complexity of Work High Med Routine

How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)

CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)

5. Client Information Name:

Title:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

6. Describe the client’s role in the project:

7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):

8. Client’s Signature:

NOTE: NAVFAC/USACE REQUESTS THAT THE CLIENT COMPLETES THIS QUESTIONNAIRE AND SUBMITS DIRECTLY BACK TO THE

GOVERNMENT’S CONTRACT SPECIALIST. THE OFFEROR WILL SUBMIT THE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO USACE WITH THEIR

PROPOSAL, AND MAY DUPLICATE THIS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FUTURE SUBMISSION ON USACE SOLICITATIONS. CLIENTS ARE HIGHLY

ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT QUESTIONNAIRES DIRECTLY TO THE OFFEROR. HOWEVER, QUESTIONNAIRES MAY BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY

TO USACE. PLEASE CONTACT THE OFFEROR FOR USACE POC INFORMATION. THE GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO VERIFY ANY

AND ALL INFORMATION ON THIS FORM.

TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT

PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.

1. QUALITY:

a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts

E VG S M U

N

b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance E VG S M U N

c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance

E VG S M U

N

d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance)

E VG S M U

N

2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below)

E VG S M U

N

b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract

E VG S M U

N

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project?

E VG S M U

N

b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes;

responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication)

E VG S M U

N

c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer?

E VG S M U

N

d) Overall customer satisfaction

E VG S M U

N

4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR

a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force?

E VG S M U N

b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort E VG S M U N

c) Government Property Control E VG S M U N

d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel E VG S M U N

e) Utilization of Small Business concerns E VG S M U N

f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines

E VG S M U N

g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes

E VG S M U N

h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)

E VG S M U N

5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)?

E VG S M U N

b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client

E VG S M U N

c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns)

E VG S M U N

d) Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section.

Yes No

e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.

Yes No

f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below.

Yes No

6. SAFETY/SECURITY

a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues?

(Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.)

E VG S M U N

b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements.

E VG S M U N

7. GENERAL

a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues).

E VG S M U N

b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues)

E VG S M U N

c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below)

Yes No

d) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor.

E VG S M U N

Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks.

Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary):

ATTACHMENT 3

KEY PERSONNEL RESUME

Provide information, listed below, on separate sheets showing qualifications of: On Site Construction Project Manager, Quality Control Manager (CQC System Manager), Site Superintendent, and Site Safety and Health Officer. NOTE:

Match the positions on this page to the list of key personnel in the narrative submission requirements and evaluation criteria.

(o) Name and Title ________________________________________________________________

(p) Project Assignment _____________________________________________________________

(q) Name of Your Firm _____________________________________________________________

(r) Years experience in the role identified ______________________________________________

(s) No. of Years: With this Firm__________ With other Firms____________

(t) Education: Degree(s)/Year/Specialization ____________________________________________

(u) Active Registration, if any: No._______, State(s) ______, First Year/ Current Year ______/______

(v) Other experience and qualifications relevant to same/similar work required under this contract:

ATTACHMENT 4

LETTER OF COMMITMENT FOR KEY PERSONNEL

TO: Contracting Officer

SUBJECT: Letter of Commitment for Proposed Contract for ____________________________________

Dear Sir or Madam:

I hereby make the unequivocal commitment that, in the event of an award of a contract to (Fill in name of Proposer), that I will fulfill the duty of (Job Title).

Sincerely, (prospective employee signs)

Date: ____________

ATTACHMENT 5

LETTER OF COMMITMENT FOR KEY SUBCONTRACTORS

(USE COMPANY LETTERHEAD)

TO: Contracting Officer

SUBJECT: Letter of Commitment for Proposed Contract for ____________________________________

Dear Sir or Madam:

I hereby make the unequivocal commitment that, in the event of an award of a contract to (Fill in name of Proposer), that (insert name of key Subcontractors firm) will fulfill the duties of (state role on a project).

Sincerely, (Authorized Official)

Date: ____________

PRICING SCHEDULE

ROBERT S. KERR HYDROPOWER PLANT REPAIR GATES

MAY 2019

Item Estimated Unit No. Description Quantity Unit Price Amount

BASE BID

1. Rehabilitate Intake Gate 1 1 JOB $_____ $______

2. Rehabilitate Intake Gate 2 1 JOB $_____ $______

3. Rehabilitate Intake Gate 3 1 JOB $_____ $______

4. Rehabilitate Intake Gate 4 1 JOB $_____ $______

5. Rehabilitate Intake Bulkhead 1 1 JOB $_____ $______

6. Rehabilitate Intake Bulkhead 2 1 JOB $_____ $______

7. Rehabilitate Intake Bulkhead 3 1 JOB $_____ $______

8. Rehabilitate Draft Tube Gate 1 1 JOB $_____ $______

9. Rehabilitate Draft Tube Gate 2 1 JOB $_____ $______

10. Rehabilitate Draft Tube Gate 3 1 JOB $_____ $______

OPTION #1

11. Parts Replacement 1 LB $_____ $______

OPTION #2

12. Inspection 1 SQ IN $_____ $______

OPTION #3

13. Welding 1 SQ IN $_____ $______

OPTION #4

14. Diving Services 1 JOB $_____ $______

OPTION #5

15. Additional Diving Services 1 JOB $_____ $______

TOTAL PROPOSAL $ __________

00 11 00 Page 1

This section reissued by Amendment #0001

PRICING SCHEDULE NOTES

1. The Offeror shall submit pricing data on the latest Pricing Schedule as published in the solicitation or the latest amendment thereto. In lieu of indicating additions / deductions to line items, all Offerors should state their revised prices for each item.

2. Offerors must insert a price on all numbered items (unless directed otherwise) of the Pricing Schedule. Failure to do so will disqualify the Offer.

3. If a modification to a proposal is submitted and provides for a lump sum adjustment to the total estimated cost, the application of the lump sum adjustment to each unit price and/or JOB price, in the Pricing Schedule must be stated or, if it is not stated, the Offeror agrees that the lump sum adjustment shall be applied on a prorated basis to every item in the Pricing Schedule.

4. All extensions of the unit prices shown (if applicable) will be subject to verification by the Government. In case of variation between the unit price and the extension, the unit price will be considered to be the offer.

5. Description of work:

See Section 01 22 00 for CLIN descriptions.

6. AWARD

a. Only one contract will be awarded under this solicitation.

-- End of Document --

00 11 00 Page 2

RS KERR REHAB DRFT TUBE, INTKE GATES, & INTKE BULKHEADS FY18 KERRGTRFRBFY18

SECTION 01 00 00

SUMMARY OF WORK

PART 1 GENERAL

1.1 SCOPE

This section provides a general summary of the work to be performed to provide the rehabilitation of the draft tube gates, intake bulkheads, and the intake gates. See the specifications and drawings for detailed requirements. The Contractor shall provide all plant, materials, equipment, labor, instruments tools, subcontractors, supervision, management, and travel necessary to complete all work in accordance with this summary of work, the attached drawings, the specifications, and all other contract documents and requirements. The Government will provide the use of intake and tailrace cranes, but cranes must be operated only by government personnel. These cranes can only be used to pick up gates and bulkheads which are in the vertical position. No other materials, equipment, or labor shall be provided.

1.2 EXPLANATION OF CONTRACT AUTHORITY AND RELATIONSHIPS

The U. S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Tulsa District will award and administer this contract and shall be the sole authority to interact contractually with, direct, and provide oversight to the Contractor.

References to any other organization, entity, or individual either directing, authorizing, approving, or in any other way contractually interacting with the Contractor shall denote such action by the designated representative(s) of the Contracting Officer, USACE, Tulsa District.

1.3 REQUIREMENTS FOR ELECTRONIC SUBMISSIONS

Except where specifically noted, submittals shall be provided in electronic format. Adobe Portable Document Format (Adobe PDF) will serve as the primary file type. Adobe PDF files submitted shall be compatible with Adobe Acrobat Reader XI. In the event another file type is needed, the Contractor shall provide compact disc with file and file reader software, or provide hard copies to the Government.

1.4 REFERENCES

The publications listed below form a part of this specification to the extent referenced. The publications are referred to in the text by basic designation only.

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS (USACE)

EM 385-1-1 (2014) Safety and Health Requirements Manual

U.S. NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION (NARA)

29 CFR 1910 Occupational Safety and Health Standards

29 CFR 1926 Safety and Health Regulations for Construction

SECTION 01 00 00 Page 1

1.5 SUMMARY OF WORK

This project will be a total turn-key contract with all work being performed by the Contractor. See other specifications sections, drawings, contract clauses, and other contract documents for detailed requirements of the work to be performed by the Contractor. The work required is summarized as follows:

General

a. Test gates and bulkheads after rehabilitation. Maximum allowable leakage is 3 gallons per minutes per gate/bulkhead.

b. After the completion of each gate or bulkhead, approval from the

Government is required prior to starting work on another gate or bulkhead.

c. Any new paint must be feathered to permit a smooth transition according to Section 09 97 02.

d. Stamping the gates and bulkheads with low stress stamps as indicated on the drawings.

e. The area in contact with the new fasteners must be painted and feathered according to section 09 97 02.

f. Any rigging points added to the gates and bulkheads must be temporary.

Drawings and calculations are required to be submitted for approval.

Side loading on the existing eyes/brackets is not allowed.

g. Contractor must provide shop drawings on any new fabricated parts prior to purchasing material.

h. Clean each gate and bulkhead slot to receive re-installation of gate or bulkhead.

Intake Bulkhead

a. Paint the bottom 10 feet of the bulkheads.

b. Paint the enclosed elevations as indicated on the drawings.

c. Paint the guide shoes.

d. Replace the fasteners.

e. The MT areas must be re-painted.

f. Inspect welds indicated on the drawings for the intake bulkheads.

g. Replace the rubber seals.

h. Replace the neoprene washers and gaskets.

i. Replace side of end plate as indicated on the drawings.

Draft Tube Gates

a. Paint each leaf the bottom 4 feet and top 4 feet.

b. Paint seal bars.

c. Paint the guide shoes.

d. Replace the fasteners.

e. Replace the rubber seals.

Intake Gates

a. Paint the bottom 10 feet of the gate.

b. Repaint the seal bars.

c. Replace the fasteners.

d. Replace the rubber seals.

e. Replace the neoprene washers and gaskets.

f. Replace the roller assembly for Gate 1. Contractor must coordinate with the Government to determine Gate 1.

Option #1 - Part Replacements Fabricate additional parts for the gates and bulkheads.

SECTION 01 00 00 Page 2

Option #2 - Inspection Perform additional weld testing on the bulkheads and gates.

Option #3 - Welding Perform additional weld repair on the bulkheads and gates.

Option #4 - Diving Services

Option #5 - Additional Diving Services

1.6 SUBMITTALS

Government approval is required for submittals with a "G" designation;

submittals not having a "G" designation are for information only. When used, a designation following the "G" designation identifies the office that will review the submittal for the Government. Submit the following in accordance with Section 01 33 00 SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES:

SD-01 Preconstruction Submittals

Work Plan; G, ECD

1.7 WORK PLAN MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS

Within 30 calendar days of contract award, a Work Plan shall be submitted for all work required by this contract. This work plan is separate from any and all documents submitted before contract award and shall provide greater detail than pre-award submitted work plans (if applicable).

The plan shall include, as a minimum, details for all work listed in paragraph SUMMARY OF WORK above. The work plan shall include detailed construction methods and procedures, description of facilities, procedures for safe conduct of the work, careful removal and disposition of materials, coordination with other work in progress, all manpower (each trade/skill required and crew sizes, including subcontractors), and all equipment (including make, model, serial number, and date of last calibration).

The Work plan shall address in detail lifting methods and equipment required to remove and replace the gates on the deck.

In addition, the Contractor shall submit any additional information as directed by the Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO). Construction activities and purchasing of materials shall not begin until the Work Plan has been approved by the ACO. The Contractor's work schedule (days of the week and hours per day) shall be stated.

1.8 SAFETY

All work shall be performed in accordance with 29 CFR 1910, 29 CFR 1926, and other references as listed herein. Where the regulations conflict, the most stringent requirements shall apply. If safety violations occur, all work shall cease immediately and no work will resume until all safety violations are corrected. Lost time for safety violations will not be subject to time extensions for contract completion. Any work performed on Government property (if applicable) shall be performed in accordance with

EM 385-1-1.

SECTION 01 00 00 Page 3

1.9 WORK HOURS

The Contractor may work up to six days a week, up to 10 hours a day unless otherwise requested in writing by the Contractor and approved in writing by the ACO.

PART 2 PRODUCTS

Not Used.

PART 3 EXECUTION

Not Used.

-- End of Section --

SECTION 01 00 00 Page 4

SUBMITTAL FORM,Jan 96 PREVIOUS EDITION IS OBSOLETE PAGE 1 OF 3 PAGES

RS KERR REHAB DRFT TUBE, INTKE GATES, & INTKE BULKHEADS FY18

01 00 00 SD-01 Preconstruction Submittals

1.7 G ECDWork Plan

01 45 00 SD-01 Preconstruction Submittals

3.2 GContractor Quality Control (CQC)

Plan SD-06 Test Reports

3.9Verification Statement 05 05 23.16 SD-01 Preconstruction Submittals

3.2Welding Quality Assurance Plan SD-03 Product Data

1.3 GWelding Procedure Qualifications

1.3.2Previous Qualifications 1.3.3Pre-Qualified Procedures 2.2Welding Electrodes and Rods

1.3.4 GWelder, Welding Operator, And

Tacker Qualification SD-06 Test Reports

3.3 GNondestructive Testing

SD-07 Certificates

1.3.1Certified Welding Procedure Specifications (WPS)

1.3.1Certified Procedure Qualification Records (PQR)

1.3.1Certified Welder Performance Qualifications (WPQ)

1.3.5 GInspector Qualifications

SUBMITTAL REGISTER

CONTRACT NO.

TITLE AND LOCATION CONTRACTOR

CONTRACTOR:

SCHEDULE DATES

CONTRACTOR

ACTION

APPROVING AUTHORITY

A C T I V I T Y

N O

T R A N S M I T T A L

N O

S P E C

S E C T

DESCRIPTION

ITEM SUBMITTED

P A R A G R A P H

C L A S S I F I C A T I O N

G O V T

O R

A E

R E V W

R SUBMIT

APPROVAL

NEEDED

BY

MATERIAL

NEEDED

BY

A C T I O N

C O D E

DATE

OF

ACTION

DATE FWD

TO APPR

AUTH/

DATE RCD

FROM

CONTR

DATE FWD

TO OTHER

REVIEWER

DATE RCD

FROM OTH

REVIEWER

A C T I O N

C O D E

DATE

OF

ACTION

MAILED

TO

CONTR/

DATE RCD

FRM APPR

AUTH REMARKS

(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) (i) (j) (k) (l) (m) (n) (o) (p) (q) (r)

SUBMITTAL FORM,Jan 96 PREVIOUS EDITION IS OBSOLETE PAGE 2 OF 3 PAGES

05 05 23.16 1.3.5Certified Welding Inspector 1.3.5Nondestructive Testing

Personnel

3.6 G ECDWeld Inspection Log

05 50 15 SD-02 Shop Drawings

2.5 G ECDShop Drawings

2.5 G ECDShop Drawings

SD-03 Product Data

3.3 G ECDHeat Treatment of Gate Rollers, Pins, and Links SD-06 Test Reports

3.4 G ECDCheck Tests for Hardness

3.6 G TROInspection Tests for Scale and

Cracks 3.5Impact Charpy-V Test

05 59 13 SD-01 Preconstruction Submittals

2.1.3 G ECDFastener Installation Procedures

2.1.4.2 G ECDSeal Installation Plan

3.4 GFunctionality Test Plan

3.4 GFunctionality Report Format

Proposed Alignment Parameters Report; G,…