W912BV-17-R-0029-0001.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

See continuation page for details of w hat has been revised by amendment 0001.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

1 37

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 07-Jul-2017

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W912BV-17-R-0029

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

15-Jun-2017

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

07-Jul-2017

CODE

CONTRACTING DIV

USACE, TULSA 1645 S 101 E AVE

TULSA OK 74128-4609

W912BV 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

AMENDMENT 0001

W912BV-17-R-0029

REPLACE ASSAULT LANDING ZONE (ALZ) RUNWAY

WITH PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE (PCC)

ALTUS AIR FORCE BASE, OK

1. The new/revised sections/appendices/pages listed below are hereby added to or revised and made a part of the solicitation. Revised or added/deleted information can be located in the specifications by searching for an asterisk and amendment number (i.e., *AM1):

00 11 00 PRICING SCHEDULE

00 22 11 PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS, EVALUATION CRITERIA, BASIS OF AWARD

2. The proposal due date is changed to 2:00PM central standard time 19 July 2017.

SECTION 00 11 00

PRICING (CLIN) SCHEDULE

CLIN Estimated Unit Unit Amount No. Description Quantity Price

--------------------------------BASE PROPOSAL--------------------------------

ASSAULT STRIP

0001 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT 72,400 SY $ _ $ _______

0002 REMOVE RIGID PAVEMENT 9,033 SY $ _ $ _______

0003 ADJUST UNDERDRAIN MANHOLE 8 EA $ _ $ _______

0004 ADJUST UNDERDRAIN

FLUSHING RISER 17 EA $ _ $ _______

0005 STABILIZED DRAINAGE LAYER 44,189 SY $ _ $ _______

0006 GRADED CRUSHED AGGREGATE

BASE COURSE (13’ THICKNESS) 6,706 SY $ _ $ _______

0007 GRADED CRUSHED AGGREGATE

BASE COURSE (VAR. DEPTH) 7,200 TN $ _ $ _______

0008 BITUMINOUS TACK COAT 34,741 SY $ _ $ _______

0009 BITUMINOUS PRIME COAT 36,954 SY $ _ $ _______

0010 HOT MIX ASPHALT (HMA)

OR WARM MIX ASPHALT (WMA)

FOR AIRFIELDS 3,306 TN $ _ $ _______

0011 HOT MIX ASPHALT (HMA)

OR WARM MIX ASPHALT (WMA)

- PAVED GRADED AREAS 3,730 TN $ _ $ _______

0012A CONCRETE PAVEMENT FOR

AIRFIELDS – 15” THICK 33,350 SY $ _ $ _______

0012B CONCRETE PAVEMENT FOR

AIRFIELDS – 17” THICK 10,890 SY $ _ $ _______

0013 GROOVING CONCRETE SURFACE 30,933 SY $ _ $ _______

0014A PAVEMENT MARKINGS WITH

TYPE I REFLECTIVE MEDIA 20,344 SF $ _ $ _______

0014B PAVEMENT MARKINGS WITH

TYPE III REFLECTIVE MEDIA 20,344 SF $ _ $ _______

0015 PAVEMENT MARKINGS WITHOUT

REFLECTIVE MEDIA 11,850 SF $ _ $ _______

0016 VISUAL LANDING ZONE

MARKER PANEL 22 EA $ _ $ _______

0017 AS-BUILT DRAWINGS 1 JOB XXXX $ _______

0018 O&M MANUALS 1 JOB XXXX $ _______

0019 TOTAL CONTRACTOR MANPOWER

REPORTING APPLICATION

FOR THE ASSAULT STRIP 1 JOB XXXX $ _______

0020 ALL OTHER WORK REQUIRED

BY THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS

FOR THE ASSAULT STRIP 1 JOB XXXX $ _______

SUBTOTAL ASSAULT STRIP

(CLINS 0001 – 0020 INCLUSIVE) $__________________

--------------------------------OPTIONAL ITEMS-------------------------------

OPTION 1 – ADDITIONAL 10’ PAVED GRADED AREA

1001 LIME MODIFIED SUBGRADE

(8” DEPTH) 4,963 SY $______ $____ _______

1002 BITUMINOUS PRIME COAT 4,963 SY $______ $____ _______

1003 BITUMINOUS TACK COAT 4,092 SY $______ $____ _______

1004 GRADED CRUSHED

AGGREGATE BASE

COURSE (6" THICKNESS) 4,963 SY $______ $____ _______

1005 HOT MIX ASPHALT (HMA)

OR WARM MIX ASPHALT (WMA)

- PAVED GRADED AREAS 750 TN $______ $____ _______

1006 AS-BUILT DRAWINGS 1 JOB XXXX $____________

1007 O&M MANUALS 1 JOB XXXX $____________

1008 TOTAL CONTRACTOR MANPOWER

REPORTING APPLICATION

FOR ADDITONAL 10’ PAVED

GRADED AREA 1 JOB XXXX $____________

1009 ALL OTHER WORK REQUIRED

BY THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS

FOR ADDITIONAL 10’ PAVED

GRADED AREA 1 JOB XXXX $____________

SUBTOTAL OPTION 1

(CLINS 1001 – 1009 INCLUSIVE) $__________________

OPTION 2 – REPLACE POLYMER LIGHTING HAND HOLE WITH CONCRETE LIGHTING HAND

HOLE

2001 CONCRETE LIGHTING HANDHOLE 30 EA $______ $____ _______

SUBTOTAL OPTION 2

(CLIN 2001 INCLUSIVE) $__________________

TOTAL BASE PROPOSAL AND OPTIONS

(CLINS 0001 – 0020 AND

1001 – 1009 AND 2001 INCLUSIVE) $__________________

Contract Duration (See Note 5):__________________

NOTES FOR PRICING (CLIN) SCHEDULE

1) Bidders must insert a price on all numbered items of the Proposal Schedule.

The price may be zero dollars or a deduct amount. Failure to do so will disqualify the proposal.

2) To better facilitate the receipt and proposal process, all modifications to proposals are to be submitted on copies of the latest Bid Schedule as published in the solicitation or the latest amendment thereto. In lieu of indicating additions/deductions to line items, all Offerors should state their revised prices for each item.

3) All extensions of the unit prices shown will be subject to verification by the Government. In case of variation between the unit price and the extension, the unit price will be considered the offer.

4) Include all costs for coordination and accommodation of Government-

Furnished, Government-Installed Equipment, as described in the bid documents, in the Bid Schedule Items for construction of the associated facilities.

5) The Offeror shall have contract duration in number of calendar days after the Notice to Proceed (NTP) is received by the Contractor, whether via electronic means or hard copy, whichever is the earliest method of delivery.

The total number of calendar days for construction through completion, ready for turnover shall not exceed the number of calendar days specified in the bid documents. The proposed duration shall become the required contract duration. The Government may issue the NTP via e-mail or Facsimile (FAX) or by other means. Day number 1 is the day after the date of receipt of the

NTP.

6) Responders are advised that this requirement may be delayed, cancelled or revised at any time during the solicitation, selection, evaluation, negotiation and/or final award process based on decisions related to DOD changes in force structure and disposition of the Armed Forces.

7) The Army will procure this facility through a design and cost competition in accordance with the provisions set forth in this Request for Proposals (RFP).

When the task order is awarded, it will be a “Firm Fixed Price Contract”.

8) Any proposal that is materially unbalanced as to prices for the Base Schedule may be rejected. An unbalanced proposal is one that is based on prices significantly less than the cost for some work and prices that are significantly overstated for other work and can also exist where only over-pricing or under-pricing exists.

9) ABBREVATIONS – For the purpose of this solicitation, the units of measure are represented as follows:

a. CY (Cubic Yard)

b. EA (Each)

c. LF (Linear Feet)

d. SY (Square Yard)

e. TN (Tons)

f. MSF (Thousand Square Feet)

10) CONDITIONS GOVERNING EVALUATION OF PROPOSALS AND AWARD OF CONTRACT.

One contract only will be awarded on this project and evaluation will be made on the Total Base Bid Plus Options in accordance with the Instructions to Offeror’s.

11) Description of Bid Items - The general outline of the principal features of each item as listed below does not in any way limit the responsibility of the proposer for making a thorough investigation of the drawings and the specifications to determine the scope of work.

Description of Base Bid Items

(a) CLINS 0001 - 0020 Include all work for demolition, grading, drainage, placement of pavement section, landscaping, concrete grooving, pavement marking, marker panel installation, all associated electrical work, and all work as shown on the drawings and specifications for the Assault Strip.

(b) CLINS 0014A and 0014B Provide pricing for both items, but only one

CLIN will be awarded.

OPTIONS:

(a) OPTION 1, CLINS 1001 - 1009 Includes all work for demolition, grading, subgrade modification, placement of pavement section, and all work as shown on the drawings and specifications for the Additional 10’ Paved Graded Area.

(b) OPTION 2, CLIN 2001 Includes all added cost for furnishing materials and labor for the complete installation of Concrete Hand Holes per detail 2 of plan sheet ES504 in lieu of Polymer Lighting Hand Holes per detail 2 on plan sheet ES504.

(c) Optional Items, at the discretion of the Government, may be awarded at the time of contract award or may be exercised at any time from the date of contract award until 90 calendar days after issuance of notice to proceed. The Government may exercise all options or any combination there of.

--END OF SECTION--

SECTION 00 22 11 - PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS, EVALUATION

CRITERIA, BASIS OF AWARD

1.0 OVERVIEW

This is a competitive best value trade-off solicitation for a construction contract for the ALZ Runway project at Altus Air Force Base, Oklahoma. The Government will evaluate proposals in accordance with the criteria described herein and award a firm fixed-price contract to the responsible firm whose proposal conforms to all the terms and conditions of the solicitation and whose proposal is determined to represent the overall best value to the Government.

If awarded the contract, the Offeror shall construct the project in accordance with the plans and specifications.

1.1 WHO CAN SUBMIT

a. Firms formally organized as construction contractors that have associated specifically for this project, consortia of firms or any other interested parties may submit proposals. Associations may be as joint ventures or as key team subcontractors.

b. Organization Conflicts of Interest (OCI) Disclosure: The Offeror shall provide a disclosure statement with its proposal which concisely describes all the relevant facts concerning the past or present organizational conflicts of interest relating to work on this project. In the same statement, and if applicable, the Offeror shall provide information to assure the Government that the conflicts of interest have been mitigated and/or neutralized to the maximum extent possible. If a conflict of interest is discovered after award of this contract, the Contracting Office will make a decision whether to terminate the contract.

2.0 BASIS OF AWARD

The Contracting Officer intends to award a firm fixed-price contract to the responsible Offeror whose proposal the Source Selection Authority determines conforms to the solicitation, is fair and reasonable, and offers the best overall value to the Government, considering all non-price factors described herein, and price. All evaluation factors, other than price, when combined, are considered more important than the price. The intent of this solicitation is to obtain the best proposal for the work within the solicitation. The Government reserves the right to accept other than the lowest priced offer or to reject all offers. The Government will not award a contract to a Firm whose proposal contains a deficiency, as defined in FAR 15.001. The Government reserves the right to reject any offer if the offer is not in the best interest of the Government.

3. 0 PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS AND INSTRUCTIONS

3.1 REQUIREMENT FOR SEPARATE PRICE AND TECHNICAL PROPOSALS

3.1.1 Each Offeror must submit both a Price Proposal and a Technical Proposal. The Price Proposal and the Technical Proposal must be submitted as separate volumes. Ensure that each file is clearly marked to indicate its contents; and the identity of the Offeror.

3.1.2 Both the Price Proposal and the Technical Proposal must be received by the closing date and time set for receipt of proposals.

3.1.3 No dollar amounts from the Price Proposal are to be included in the Technical Proposal.

3.1.4 All information intended to be evaluated as part of the Technical Proposal must be submitted as part of the Technical Proposal (Volume 1). Do not merely cross-reference similar material in the Price Proposal, or vice versa.

Also, do not include links to websites in lieu of incorporating information into your proposal.

3.1.5 Deviations, Exception and Assumptions

Deviations and exceptions to the terms and conditions of the solicitation are not allowed. Should the offer include any standard company terms and conditions that conflict with the terms and conditions of the solicitation, the offer may be deemed “unacceptable” and thus ineligible for award. Should the Offeror have any questions related to specific terms and conditions, these must be resolved prior to submission of the offer. If the Offeror must make any assumptions prior to submitting the proposal, the Offeror shall list and describe in detail the assumptions on the first page of each Tab. All assumptions shall be fully supported with the Offeror’s rationale and shall fully explain the impact, if any, on the performance and/or specific requirement of the RFP. The Offeror shall clearly describe on the Proposal Cover Sheet submitted with the Price Proposal any assumption to the contractual and/or technical terms and include the monetary impact on the solicitation with the price proposal. This information will not be evaluated separately but may impact the evaluation of other factors.

3.2 DISCUSSIONS

The Government does not intend to enter into discussions with Offerors prior to making an award. Offerors are encouraged to present their best technical proposal and prices in their initial proposal submission. However, in accordance with FAR Part 15.306, should discussions become necessary, the Government reserves the right to hold them. If this occurs, a competitive range will be determined and offerors notified. The competitive range may be limited for purposes of efficiency in accordance with (IAW) FAR Part 15.306(c)(2).

3.3 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

3.3.1 Submit the electronic files specifically authorized and/or required elsewhere in this section. Do not submit excess information, to include audio-visual materials, electronic media, etc. All pages shall be numbered.

3.3.2 Proposal materials shall be submitted via AMRDEC SAFE website https://safe.armdec.army.mil/safe/ , or via email, containing the proposal in PDF file format using Adobe Acrobat software. Proposals shall be tabbed and labeled in a manner to afford easy identification from a Table of Contents. Each page shall be identified with the appropriate page number centered at the bottom of the page. Sheet size of the proposal contents shall be 8 ½ by 11 inch unless another paper size is specifically authorized elsewhere in this section for a particular submission. Do not use alternative paper sizes (e.g., 11” x 14” or 11” x 17” sheets) unless specifically authorized in this section for a particular submission. Do not use a font size smaller than 10, an unusual font style such as script, or condensed print for any submission. All page margins must be at least 1 inch wide, but may include headers and footers.

3.3.3 Provide read-only PDF file format using Adobe Acrobat software containing the technical volume as well as a read-only PDF format using Adobe Acrobat software containing the price volume.

3.3.4 Confidential” projects cannot be submitted to demonstrate capability unless all of the information required for evaluation as specified herein can be provided to the Government as part of the Offeror’s technical proposal. Offerors that include in their proposals information that they do not want disclosed to the public for any purpose, or used by the Government except for evaluation purposes, must be clearly marked in accordance with the instructions at FAR 52.215-1, “Instructions to Offerors—Competitive Acquisition”, paragraph (e), “Restriction on disclosure and use of data”.

3.3.5 For submissions with page limitations, the pages will be counted as follows: One side of the paper is one page; information on both the back and front of one sheet of paper will be counted as two pages. Where authorized, fold-out pages (11" x 14" or 11" x 17") will count as one page. Tables of content, proposal cover letters, and tabs between proposal information do not count toward any page limitations in the proposal.

3.3.6 Proposal revisions shall be submitted as page replacements with revised text readily identifiable, e.g., bold face print, highlighting or underlining. The source of the revision, e.g., Error, Omission, Clarification or amendment shall be included and annotated for each revision. Proposal replacement pages shall be numbered, shall be clearly marked “REVISED”, shall show the date of revision, shall be submitted in appropriate number of copies (e.g., if two

(2) copies of the original page was required. A revised copy of the entire proposal in .PDF format shall be provided.

3.4 SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL (VOLUME 1)

3.4.1 Number of Sets of the Technical Proposal. Submit the entire Technical Proposal in .pdf format using Adobe Acrobat software to print to a .pdf file; do NOT scan the document(s) into a .pdf file and submit via AMRDEC SAFE. The text portion of the complete proposal shall be contained as a single .pdf file. Sections of the proposal shall be bookmarked (linked to the index) in logical order.

3.4.2 Format and Contents of the Technical Proposal and List of Tabs. The technical proposal will be appropriately labeled as such and shall be organized using the tabs specified in the chart below.

3.4.3 Page Limitations. The following page limitations are established for each Factor/Subfactor:

Volume 1 Technical Proposal Factor 1 –Experience

Subfactor 1 - Tab A – Specialized Experience Prime - Limited to 5 pages (1 page per project; maximum 5 forms (see paragraph 5.1.1))

Subfactor 2 – Tab B - Specialized Experience Key Subcontractors – Limited to 6 pages per subcontractor (see paragraph 5.2.1)

Subfactor 3 – Tab C - Key Personnel – Limited to 1 page for each resume provided (see paragraph 5.3.1)

Factor 2 –Performance Capability

Subfactor 1 – Tab D - Proposed Contract Duration and Summary Schedule – Limited to 10 pages.

Subfactor 2 – Tab E - Organizational and Technical Approach – Limited to 20 pages.

Factor 3 - Small Business Participation – Limited to 5 pages.

Factor 4 - Past Performance – No page limitation

3.5 SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE PRICE PROPOSAL (VOLUME 2)

3.5.1. Number of Sets of the Price Proposal. Submit the Price Proposal in read only PDF files via AMRDEC

SAFE.

3.5.2. Size Restrictions and Page Limits. The following are established for each Factor/Subfactor:

Volume 2 Price Proposal Factor 5 – Section 00 11 00 Pricing Schedule (no page limit)

Proposal materials shall be submitted in PDF file. Do not use a font size smaller than 10, an unusual font style such as script, or condensed print for any submission. Each page shall be identified with the appropriate page number centered at the bottom of the page. Sheet size of the proposal contents shall be 8-1/2 inches x 11 inches. There are no page limits set for the Price Proposal. However, limit your response to information required by this solicitation.

Excess information will not be considered in the Government’s evaluation.

3.5.3 Format and Contents of the Price Proposal and List of Tabs. Format and Contents of the Price Proposal and List of Tabs. The Price Proposal shall be appropriately labeled as such and shall be organized as indicated in the following chart. Note: If the Offeror is not required to submit any information under a listed Tab (such as a JV Agreement) in accordance with the instructions below, that tab can be omitted. However, do not renumber the subsequent tabs.

4.0 PROPOSAL CONTENTS AND RELATED EVALUATION FACTORS

VOLUME 1 – TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

Factor/ Subfactor/ Element

LOCATION DESCRIPTION RELATIVE IMPORTANCE

FACTOR 1 EXPERIENCE Most Important Factor (Equally Important to Factor 2)

Subfactor 1 Vol 1 Tab A Specialized Experience Prime Most Important Subfactor

Subfactor 2 Vol 1 Tab B Specialized Experience Key Subcontractors

2nd Most Important Subfactor

Subfactor 3 Vol 1 Tab C Key Personnel 3rd Most Important Subfactor

FACTOR 2 PERFORMANCE

CAPABILITY

Most Important Factor (Equally Important to Factor 1)

Subfactor 1 Vol 1 Tab D Proposed Contract Duration and Summary Schedule

Most Important Subfactor

Subfactor 2 Vol 1 Tab E Organization and Technical Approach

2nd Most Important Subfactor

FACTOR 3 Vol 1 Tab F SMALL BUSINESS

PARTICIPATION

4th Most Important Factor (less important than Factor 4)

FACTOR 4 Vol 1 Tab G PAST PERFORMANCE 3rd Most Important Factor (less important than Factors 1 & 2 combined, more important than Factor 3))

VOLUME 2 – PRICE PROPOSAL

Factor/ Subfactor/ Element

LOCATION

DESCRIPTION

RELATIVE IMPORTANCE

N/A Vol 2 Tab A Proposal Cover Sheet Not Rated N/A Vol 2 Tab B Signed Letter Responding to

RFP, SF1442 and Acknowledgement of Amendments

Not Rated

FACTOR 5 Vol 2 Tab C SECTION 00 11 00, PRICING SCHEDULE

Less important than Factors 1, 2, 3, & 4 combined

N/A Vol 2 Tab D Bid Guarantee (Bid Bond) Not Rated N/A Vol 2 Tab E Representations & Certifications Not Rated N/A Vol 2 Tab F JV Agreement (if applicable) Not Rated Subfactor 1 Vol 2 Tab G Subcontracting Plan Go/No Go Subfactor 2 Vol 2 Tab H Bonding Capability Go/No Go

5.1 VOLUME 1 – FACTOR 1 - EXPERIENCE

5.2 VOLUME 1 – TAB A: SUBFACTOR 1 – SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE PRIME

5.2.1 Submission Requirements:

Demonstrate the specialized experience of the Offeror on projects same/similar in size and complexity to that described in the solicitation for same/similar construction services.

The Contractor shall complete a minimum of three (3), but no more than five (5), “Experience Information” forms, with a max of 1 page per form, attached at the end of this section (Attachment 1), in response to this factor. Offerors must submit at least one (1) project type A and two (2) projects type B below. If an Offeror chooses to submit 5 projects the Offeror must submit 1 additional project for B. All blocks must be filled in and all data should be accurate, current, and complete. All projects submitted must be at least 50% complete and completed within the last 5 years. All projects submitted shall exceed $5,000,000 in value. The prime contractor shall submit no more than five (5) projects for the following:*

A. Submit one (1) project valued at over $10,000,000 in value.

B. Submit two (2) projects that involve at least 50% work on military airfield paving to include work on high security airfield areas.

5.2.2 Evaluation Criteria:

a. The Government will evaluate the extent of recent, related experience of the Offeror in regard to their role on this project. The Government may place greater importance on projects performed as a prime contractor than as a subcontractor, depending upon overall role and relevancy considerations. Private sector work on Airfield Paving is acceptable. However, contractors demonstrating Federal Government/Military project experience will be given additional consideration. Offerors demonstrating experience with projects of similar size and complexity will be viewed more favorably by the Government.

(1) The Offeror must submit the requested information to demonstrate a record of recent, related experience in construction, for the project (which may include similar state or local government or private counterparts) included in this solicitation. Recent experience includes projects at least 50% complete (see above criteria) or those completed and turned over within 5 years of the proposal issue date for this RFP for construction experience. Joint Venture partners should each demonstrate experience commensurate with their role on this project or how their experience qualifies them for their role on this project. If any of the information required is not included in the form (Attachment 1), then the Contractor will be considered non-responsive and evaluated as unacceptable.

(2) The Government reserves the right to verify the experience record of cited projects or other recent projects by reviewing the Corps of Engineers Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), other DOD or Government appraisal systems or to interview owners or references. The Government may check any or all cited references to verify supplied information.

(3) To receive credit for extent (amount) of experience, the Offeror shall demonstrate a history of recent, relevant experience. A firm will not receive credit under this factor for the relevant experience of key personnel proposed for this project.

(4) The Government will consider extent of recent experience, degree of relationship of such experience to this project, demonstrated familiarity with applicable codes and local conditions. Some examples of relevancy to this project may include, but not be limited to:

(a) Number, size, type work, complexity, location

(b) Dates (Projects at least 50% complete or completed no more than 5 years preceding date of

Solicitation)

(c) Firm's role and extent of work self-performed (brokering out all work and simply “pouring the sidewalks” or similar minor work on a cited project are examples of less relevant experience).

5.2 VOLUME 1 – TAB B: SUBFACTOR 2 - SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE KEY SUBCONTRACTORS

5.2.1 Submission Requirements:

Demonstrate the specialized experience of the key subcontractors, on projects same/similar in size and complexity to their role on the project as described in the solicitation for same/similar construction services. As a minimum identify the following key subcontractors if not self-performing the work:

A. Airfield Paving. The Contractor will be required to show that they have successful experience in construction of airfield paving.

B. Concrete and Asphalt Batch Plant. The Contractor will be required to show that they have successful experience in establishing a batch plant to provide paving materials.

C. Laboratory /Testing of Paving Materials. The Contractor will be required to show that they have successful experience in providing and conducting testing services for airfield paving.

Provide a minimum of one (1) unequivocal letter of commitment from each proposed Key Subcontractor. Use the form letter (Attachment 5) at the end of this section.

If, because of reasons beyond the control of the Offeror, the subcontractors named in this proposal are not able to participate as identified, replacement subcontractors for this project shall be required to have qualifications, experience and past performance meeting or exceeding those identified in the proposal. Replacement subcontractors shall be presented for acceptance and approval by the Contracting Officer.

The Subcontractors shall complete a minimum of three (3), but no more than five (5), “Experience Information” forms with a max of 1 page per form attached at the end of this section (Attachment 1), for each key subcontractor, in response to this factor. All blocks must be filled in and all data shall be accurate, current, and complete. All projects submitted must be at least 50% complete and completed within the last 5 years. Forms shall clearly indicate extent of work performed on the contract to include the subcontract percent of overall contract.

5.2.2 Evaluation Criteria:

a. The Government will evaluate the extent of recent, related experience of the Key Subcontractors in regard to their role on this project. The Government may place greater importance on projects performed as a prime contractor than as a subcontractor, depending upon overall role and relevancy considerations. Private sector work is acceptable. Federal Government project experience will not be rated inherently more important than non-Federal Government project experience. Offerors demonstrating experience with projects of similar size and complexity will be viewed more favorably by the Government.

(1) The Key Subcontractors must submit the requested information to demonstrate a record of recent, related experience in construction, for their role in the project (which may include similar state, local government or private counterparts) included in this solicitation. Recent experience includes projects well underway (see above criteria) or those completed and turned over within 5 years of the proposal issue date for this RFP for construction experience. If any of the information required is not included in the form (Attachment 1), then the Contractor will be considered non-responsive and evaluated as unacceptable.

(2) The Government reserves the right to verify the experience record of cited projects or other recent projects by reviewing the Corps of Engineers Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), other DOD or Government appraisal systems or to interview owners or references. The Government may check any or all cited references to verify supplied information.

(3) To receive credit for extent (amount) of experience, the Key Subcontractors shall demonstrate a history of recent, relevant experience. A firm will not receive credit under this factor for the relevant experience of key personnel proposed for this project.

(4) The Government will consider extent of recent experience, degree of relationship of such experience to this project, demonstrated familiarity with applicable codes and local conditions. Some examples of relevancy to this project may include, but not be limited to:

(a) Number, size, type work, complexity, location

(b) Dates (Projects at least 50% complete or completed no more than 5 years preceding date of

Solicitation)

5.3 VOLUME 1 - TAB C: SUBFACTOR 3 - KEY PERSONNEL

5.3.1 Submission Requirements:

Offeror shall submit a description of the Personnel Listing and Qualifications in accordance with the applicable requirements of Attachment #3, Key Personnel Resume. Resume information shall be provided for each of the key personnel listed below and shall be limited to no more than one (1) page per person.

The Personnel Listing and Qualifications shall, at a minimum, address the following:

1. On Site Construction Project Manager

2. On Site Superintendent

3. On Site Contractor Quality Control System (CQC) Manager(s) (plus any Alternate)

4. ACI Certified Concrete Transportation Inspector responsible for Airfield paving construction inspections

5. Civil Engineer

6. Concrete Batch Plant Operator

7. Project Scheduler

The minimum experience requirements shall be in accordance with the following:

On Site Construction Project Manager: The minimum experience requirements for the On Site Construction Project Manager are at least 15 years construction management experience with experience as a project manager on at least one airfield paving project within the past 5 years. He/she also shall *AM1 have a bachelor’s degree. be a graduate engineer or a graduate of construction management. *

On-Site Superintendent: The minimum experience requirements for the Site Superintendent are at least 10 years‘ experience as site superintendent, managing multiple trades and subcontractors, with at least one previously documented successful project *AM1 (rating must be satisfactory or better) * on airfield paving within the last 5 years. The project superintendent must maintain a physical presence at the site at all times and, together with the contractor quality control manager is responsible for all construction and related activities at the site, except as otherwise acceptable to the Contracting Officer.

On Site Quality Control System Manager: The minimum experience requirements for the Construction Quality Control (CQC) System Manager must be a graduate engineer, graduate architect, or a graduate of construction management, with a minimum of 2 years construction experience on construction similar to this contract, or a construction person with a minimum of 15 years in related construction work.

ACI Concrete Transportation Inspector: The minimum experience requirements for the ACI Certified Concrete Transportation Inspector are at least 5 years’ experience in construction inspection of heavy duty pavements.

Additional consideration will be given for ACI Certified Transportation Inspector who has performed work under the USACE Airfield Paving specifications 32 13 11.

Civil Engineer: The minimum experience requirements for the Civil Engineer is someone who is a graduate civil engineer or construction manager with minimum 5 years’ experience in the type of work being performed on this project.

Concrete Batch Plant Operator: The minimum experience requirements for the Concrete Batch Plant Operator has a National Ready Mix Concrete Association (NRMCA) Plant Manager certification at the Plant Manager level and at least 5 years plant management. Additional consideration will be given for Plant Operator who has performed work under the USACE Airfield Paving specifications 32 13 11.

Scheduler: The minimum experience requirements for the Project Scheduler is someone who is certified by someone such as AACE as a Planning and Scheduling Professional (PSP) or approved equal. They must have a minimum of 2-years’ experience scheduling construction projects similar in size and nature to this project with scheduling software that meets the requirements of the specification. They must be a skilled planning and scheduling professional with advanced experience in project planning, and developing, monitoring, updating, forecasting and analyzing integrated project schedules. Provide at least 2 projects within past 5 years as evidence of developing and updating schedules on similar size and complexity of project in the type of work being performed on this project.

Minimum experience requirements for other personnel shall be as required by Division 01. Provide unequivocal letters of commitment from all proposed key personnel not currently employed by the team members. Use the form letter (Attachment 4) at the end of this section. Qualifications for replacement Key Personnel shall be submitted to the Contracting Officer for concurrence that the substitute meets or exceeds those qualifications held by the key personnel proposed by the Offeror.

5.3.2 Evaluation Criteria:

The Government will evaluate the required information to determine how well the Offeror identifies and demonstrates that its key personnel meet or exceed minimum qualifications necessary to perform construction.

Offerors providing resumes for key personnel for this project that have experience in similar key positions on the projects shown under Specialized Experience will be viewed more favorably by the Government. Performance of key personnel proposed for this project may be taken into account when it comes to the attention of the Government.

If alternates are proposed for key positions, the evaluation rating will consider the lesser qualified or experienced person, if there is a difference.

6.1 VOLUME 1 – FACTOR 2 - PERFORMANCE CAPABILITY

6.2 VOLUME 1 -TAB D: SUBFACTOR 1 - PROPOSED CONTRACT DURATION AND SUMMARY

SCHEDULE

6.2.1 Submission Requirements:

a. The Offeror shall propose the contract duration in the appropriate location on the Pricing Schedule not to exceed the maximum contract duration specified in the Special Contract Requirement (SCR) entitled COMMENCEMENT, PROSECUTION, AND COMPLETION OF WORK. The proposed duration shall become the required contract duration. Limit the information to 10 pages or less.

b. Submit a summary level schedule for construction including any construction phasing. Schedules or diagrams may be provided separately in a size that is easily read, but shall be clearly labeled as Tab D. 11” x 14” or 11” x 17” sized sheets may be used for the summary schedule required by this section. This summary schedule will, after contract award, be replaced with a project schedule as required by Section 01 32 01.00 10 PROJECT SCHEDULE. The summary schedule shall be task oriented, indicating the number of calendar days, after notice to proceed, by which milestones are to be achieved. Offeror may use a critical path or other method of his choice;

however, schedules shall be graphically represented. The proposed summary schedule shall reflect the proposed contract duration. Give attention to the following features:

(1) Show the overall construction phase for major items. At a minimum the contractor shall identify and include batch plant set-up and testing, stock pile of materials, submittals process, equipment staging, access road construction, runway demolition, and runway construction, site work and utilities (if applicable). Airfield paving Aggregate testing and approval, Airfield paving mix design approval to include submission and review by the USACE Transportation Systems Center (TSC) in accordance with ECB 2014-20, Airfield Paving Installation, and any identified long lead items to include submittal approval.

(2) Show turnover of the project. Identify any proposed phased turnovers (if applicable). The time to complete the project and turnover to the Government must consider the requirement for the Contractor’s CQC completion inspection and the subsequent joint Contractor-Government turnover inspection.

(3) Capabilities and description to perform 24/7 operations.

(4) Demonstrate technical approach showing how the contractor will accomplish the work within the timeframe stated and shall not exceed a runway shutdown of more than 6 months.

(5) Constraints: Offeror must demonstrate the capability and flexibility to plan and schedule the complete project to meet the proposed contract completion period. Clearly identify any constraints on the schedules presented (e.g., labor or material availability, permits, weather, etc.). Indicate the anticipated overall critical path on the schedule.

(6) Show as-built submissions.

The intent is to provide enough detail to demonstrate the Offeror’s understanding of the project; however, it is not the intent for the Offeror to provide the amount of detail that will be required in the pre-work submittals contained in Division 01 of this RFP.

6.2.2 Evaluation Criteria:

Will be evaluated to ensure the contractor will perform appropriate construction phasing and has the capability to perform 24/7 operations and realistically perform the work in the required timeframe that includes a runway shutdown of no more than 6 months.

a. Proposed Contract Duration: This duration will become the contractually binding completion period. The

Government will evaluate the contract duration, as proposed by the Offeror in the Pricing Schedule, not to exceed the maximum allowed duration shown in the SCR entitled COMMENCEMENT, PROSECUTION AND COMPLETION OF WORK. In assessing the reasonableness of the proposed contract duration, the Government may take into account how well the proposed summary schedule supports the proposed duration, as well as use other information, such as but not limited to independent judgment concerning logic, constraints and typical construction durations. A proposed contract duration shorter than the maximum allowed duration will receive additional rating consideration, provided it is realistic and deemed to be achievable. The Government will consider an unreasonably condensed contract duration, which places additional cost or schedule risk on the Government or which may create a risk of contract or performance failure, as a significant weakness or a deficiency, depending upon the evaluators' judgment. During the subsequent comparison between proposals, differences between proposed contract durations of at least three weeks (differences of 21 calendar days between proposals) will be considered an advantage to the Government, with greater differences also considered, accordingly. No advantage will be considered between proposals for differences less than 21 calendar days.

b. Summary Schedule: The Government will evaluate the summary schedule for construction. The length of the schedule must match the proposed contract duration. If it is shorter than the proposed contract duration, it offers no advantage to the Government because it is non-binding, only representing a preliminary planned schedule. A schedule shorter than the proposed contract duration may indicate the Offeror is placing additional risk on the Government for any delays between the scheduled completion date and the required contract completion period.

Both parties shall assume field overhead costs are included in the contract price for the full proposed contract duration. Therefore, the Government believes that there is no valid need to shorten the schedule less than the full proposed contract duration. The Government will evaluate the schedule to assess the strength of understanding of the project scope, restrictions which must be considered in the schedule e.g., permitting, long lead items, phasing, etc. The Government will evaluate the strength of understanding of events associated with coordinating submittals, the firm's capability to schedule the complete project within the proposed contract duration and the realism of the schedule. A schedule that offers advantage(s) to the Government over one that merely indicates an adequate understanding of the scope, restrictions, major milestones and general understanding of the various events that can affect start and completion of construction will receive additional consideration.

6.2 VOLUME 1, TAB E: SUBFACTOR 2 - ORGANIZATION & TECHNICAL APPROACH

6.2.1 Submission Requirements:

a. Provide information that describes the offeror’s organization and intended technical approach to executing the construction contract per the detailed requirements herein. Limit the information to 20 pages or less. Clearly but concisely describe the organizational and technical approach to project management and execution.

b. Organization: Describe what firms, their resources and how their resources will be utilized, their roles and responsibilities and any contractual arrangements that have been established. Clearly describe any teaming or joint venture arrangements, including a clear description of each firm’s roles and responsibilities on the project. A copy of the teaming or joint venture agreement(s) may be appended to the plan (not included in the page limitation). Include a simple organizational chart, illustrating the organization, including the proposed quality control group(s). Present a matrix of responsibilities for each firm in executing the key work breakdown structure activities of the project, including construction activities for each major feature. Identify the firms chosen for the project, if not to be self-performed. Offerors are required to identify the specific firm(s) chosen for Airfield Paving, Paving Testing, HMS/PCC production proofing and Electrical Airfield Lighting Utilities The Offeror shall be required to obtain the Contracting Officer’s approval for any substitution of firms listed. Describe the proposed management structure for the team, describing how the construction process will be managed and the authorities and the delegations of authority within the team. Include a key personnel organization chart that clearly depicts the key positions and the names of the personnel, their firm affiliations and their job locations, their job/position title within the organization.

The key personnel organization chart shall be consistent with the corporate organization chart, with the matrix of responsibilities assigned to the firms, and with the list of key personnel as provided under the Tab, “Key Personnel”.

c. Self-Performed Work: Generally describe the items the Offeror will self-perform to comply with the requirements in Section 00 72 00 for self-performed work.

d. Quality Control: Describe the team’s quality control approach, corporate systems and capabilities to maintain quality control of the construction. Describe the proposed quality control organization, including the proposed staffing plan. Provide information on how you will handle internal and external requests for information, shop drawings, progress meetings, site visits, contract completion, closeout, as-built, and completion documentation.

Quality Control Testing Plan: Offeror shall submit a description of the Quality Control Testing Plan. A description of the laboratory/testing facilities and testing equipment and methods shall be provided. The Quality Control Testing Plan shall, at a minimum, address the following:

1. Laboratory/Testing Facilities Description – include laboratory accreditation process and location

2. Testing Equipment Description – include evidence of compliance with testing standards and calibration

3. Record Keeping and Testing Documentation Procedures

4. Applicable Certifications

e. Safety Plan: Describe the team’s safety approach, corporate systems and capabilities to maintain safety requirements during construction. Describe the proposed safety organization, including the proposed staffing plan.

The intent is to provide enough detail to demonstrate the Offeror’s understanding of the project; however, it is not the intent for the Offeror to provide the amount of detail that will be required in the pre-work submittals contained in Division 01 of this RFP.

f. Concrete/Asphalt Batch Plant Plan: Offeror shall submit a description of both the Concrete Batch Plant and Asphalt Batch Plant Plan. The Concrete/Asphalt Batch Plant Plan shall, at a minimum, address the following:

1. Both Concrete and Asphalt batch plant location – include haul time from placing site. (Concrete plant located off Government premises no more than 15 minutes haul time from the placing site. Reference 2.10.1.a of section 32 13 11)

2. Set up – include description for obtaining applicable permitting.

3. Concrete and Asphalt batch plant capabilities.

4. Concrete and Asphalt batch plant certifications.

g. Equipment Plan. Offeror shall submit a description of the construction Equipment Plan. A description of the construction equipment, capabilities, and method in which the equipment will be utilized for this runway construction project in accordance with the technical specifications will be provided. The construction Equipment Plan shall, at a minimum, address the following:

1. Drainage layer equipment – include placement and compaction equipment.

2. Asphalt equipment – include hauling equipment, material transfer vehicles, asphalt pavers, and rollers.

3. Concrete equipment – include concrete mixers/transporting equipment, transfer and spreading equipment, paver-finisher, curing equipment, and sawing equipment.

4. Concrete grooving equipment

5. Runway rubber and paint removal equipment

6. Runway pavement marking equipment

7. Pavement demolition equipment

h. Construction Plan: Offeror shall submit a description of the Construction Plan. For each phase of construction, provide a description of the construction methods and procedures showing how the work will be accomplished. The Construction Plan shall, at a minimum, address the following:

1. Material Procurement

2. Stockpile of Materials

3. Base Access and Haul Routes

4. Foreign Object or Debris (FOD) Prevention

5. Environmental Protection

6. Storm Water Pollution Control

7. Demolition and Recycled Materials *AM1 – include installation of recycled asphalt placement on base roads.*

8. Construction – include earthwork, subdrainage system installation, geotextile installation, drainage layer installation, base course installation, concrete installation, HMA installation, concrete grooving, sealing, pavement marking, and seeding.

6.2.2 Evaluation Criteria:

a. The Government will evaluate the strengths, weaknesses and any deficiencies in the plan. The Government will evaluate the firm’s understanding of the requirements described in the Division 01 requirements and the plans and technical specifications of the Solicitation and the capability to execute the project. Some additional specific evaluation considerations are listed below. This list is not all-inclusive.

b. Organization. The Government will evaluate the clarity and strength of…