W912BU22R0016 Amendment 1 Portfolio.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to respond to RFIs and schedule a second site visit for this project. Attachments are included that may be informational to proposective offerors.

All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 24

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 22-Mar-2022

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W912BU22R0016

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

25-Feb-2022

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE

RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

22-Mar-2022

CODE

US ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT, PHILADELPHIA

CONTRACTING DIVISION

WANAMAKER BUILDING

100 PENN SQUARE EAST

PHILADELPHIA PA 19107-3390

W912BU 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W912BU22R0016

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14

CONTINUATION PAGE

REPLY TO THE

ATTENTION OF: CENAP-CTC

MEMORANDUM For: 99th RD 18 March 2022

SUBJECT: Requests for Information Consolidated for Solicitation W912BU22R0016 VA086 Fort AP Hill USARC

Compiled 7 March 2022

1. Given the large extent of the HVAC replacement and re-design, will a Dedicated Outside Air System, separate from the individual zones be required? Or will the individual zones be acceptable to handle the DOA independently?

Response: Bid per the design-build SOW.

2. Who is responsible for the electronic security system (ESS), Data/comm, and A/V? If the Contractor, what is the extent of scope? NONE is currently identified in the RFP SOW.

Response: Bid per SOW.

3. 2.1.2 Scope item p. – Tile in restrooms and showers, this scope does not address toilet partitions or plumbing fixtures. Please further define this scope to be included in the contract. Part 6 addresses it slightly, but makes it sound like minor repairs… please provide clarity as it is impossible to correctly quantify with the scope of work as outlined.

Response: Bid per the SOW.

4. 2.1.2 Letter x. - existing equipment, devices, etc.… is there a log that can be provided, contractors need to be able to quantify this… Response: Reference to storage container in Para 1.1.1.c. is no longer valid. See Para 2.1.2.x. for listing of items to be re-installed per the SOW.

5. Is all lighting, switches, outlets, and trims existing to remain/reuse? If not, please provide detailed scope.

6. Please confirm a level 4 drywall finish is acceptable.

7. Will Microsoft project be an acceptable schedule alternative for this project that the government has current access to?

Response: No. Bid per SOW.

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS

WANAMAKER BUILDING, 100 PENN SQUARE EAST

PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA 19107-3390

8. When will the NTP be provided, or rather at what point does the Period of Performance start? (IE, Complete design, post award kick-off,) Given current the current status of the availability of materials, will the schedule be negotiated once the design is complete?

Response: The NTP will be provided after the Performance and Payment Bonds have been received and reviewed.

9. Are there any insulation requirements for the Training Building? Roof? Walls? Interior partitions?

Sound? NONE is identified in the RFP SOW.

10. Upon further review and building a code compliant proposal, the question is raised on the Section 01

10 00 Par. 6.13.2.3, “Drill Hall” or as labeled on as-built drawings “Assembly”. Per ASHREA 62.1 the occupancy load for an area labeled as such will be 300 People, which drives the Outside Air requirement higher. Please confirm this is the appropriate understanding and occupancy of this space. If not, please provide the intended occupancy so that the correctly sized equipment can be budgeted.

Response: The Drill Hall occupancy load identified in ASHREA 62.1 as 300 people is correct.

11. On the previous solicitation (W912BU21RE0033) there were multiple amendments with critical information. Please confirm the information provided in the amendments, specifically amendments 2 and 3 will be issued under this solicitation.

Response: All information associated with the FY21 solicitation are cancelled. See attached information pertaining to this solicitation.

12. Please confirm all ductwork is to be removed and replaced in its entirety (100%). If not, please provide requirements for reuse and the anticipated quantities.

Response: Bid per SOW 100% replacement.

13. If the mech replacement option is selected, are we required to remove and install a new finished carpentry ceiling fixtures in the main lobby, like the existing one see photo. Also, the recess lights are they to be replaced?

Response: Bid per SOW. Wooden architectural accent shall be removed, cleaned and reinstalled, as necessary.

14. Are we to replace the existing ceiling lights in the base bid section or in the mech replacement option?

See photo.

15. There are numerous areas above the existing ACT ceilings with structural timber supports please see photo attached. Are they to be left in place or removed? If removed, are you requiring new structural timber supports to be re-constructed?

Response: Leave in place. Bid per SOW.

16. Are you requiring the existing sprinkler system to be replaced in the base bid or in the mech work option? Or are the sprinklers just to remain as is?

17. Do you have specs for this project, I am just trying to figure how we got to the finishes last time. In my bid folder from previous I do not see any specs or room requirements –

18. First off, will there be any opportunity to do another walk thru the project and second where at in the information provided by your office is the information needed for the RFI?

Response: Site visit will be provided 31 March at 0900AM until complete.

19. Is reuse of any existing duct acceptable if we include encapsulation or duct cleaning?

20. Are there a minimum number of zones for new HVAC systems, or should we assume no fewer zones than currently exist?

21. Will any alternates be considered that might deviate from the SOW included in this bid?

22. After downloading the documents on Building Connected, I only see Division 1 of the specs. And it is unclear what the scope of this project is. Are you looking for roofing services such as roof observations? We can also provide design assistance service and testing. Please let me know what services you are looking for.

Response: Bid per SOW.

23. Please note that it is possible to install a new metal roof without going thru the logistical challenges associated with removing an existing metal roof using Roof Hugger Metal-Over-Metal products. Would the government be willing to consider a solution that allows the existing batt insulation and existing metal roof to remain and installs a new metal roof over the existing utilizing a Roof Hugger system? (http://roofhugger.com/)

24. In the SOW, section 2.1.2 m, states Provide athletic mats in Fitness Room. Are there any required specifications for the athletic mats? In addition, are they to be installed continuously throughout the entire room, or is there a specific area to be covered?

25. In the SOW, section 2.1.2 p, states Provide wall tile in restrooms and showers with 4”x4”x3/8” ceramic tile on full height wall… Does this apply to all full height walls within the restrooms and showers? In addition, are the existing shower partitions to remain as is?

Response: Provide tile adjacent to shower partitions to complete ceramic wall tile, match existing.

26. In the SOW, section 2.1.2 q, states …Include replacing all exterior rows of ceiling grid damaged during demolition. Include removal and replacement of ceiling grid (all existing ceiling grid is to be removed).

Is the intent of the SOW to replace all of the existing ceiling grid with new ceiling grid throughout the Training Building?

27. Section 2.1.2 x, states …Awarded contractor shall clean, re-assemble, and reinstall stored items in

Training Building. Is there a list of items in order to understand quantities?

Response: Reference to storage container in Para 1.1.1.c. is no longer valid. See Para 2.1.2.x.

identifies the items to be re-installed per the SOW.

28. Will the Government allow PPQs in lieu of the CPARs rating as our company does not yet have a

CPARs to report?

Response: See the evaluation criteria in the solicitation.

29. I would like to schedule a site visit for Ft AP Hill, to see if the site conditions have changed since the last site visit in August when this project was last solicited.

blockedhttps://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2froofhugger.com%2f&c=E,1,gwp6oau4u-uGNkItdK_-sAx-Ca_Hmfm99VuUu2X-7mIm7tXL_YQC5ksNvYVc0Br3xevigOccANOrWWXRTWO2R_B4QlE7blw9dZnkIqFbHFE2Z3ICjO8QF86T&typo=1

30. I understand that a 2/22 site visit was offered, however, the solicitation documents for the project did not post on sam.gov until 2/25, and we would like to take another look in the building. As the roof had issues with leaking, we would like to verify the extent of the interior repairs, among other pre-existing conditions.

31. The VAVs integrated with the HVAC systems require electrical power that exceeds the existing electrical capacity. The SOW is silent about upgrading the existing electrical service. Should the electrical upgrade be incorporated into this project?

32. Have the leaks in the roof been addressed? If not, has there been more damage to the interior finishes since the last site visit in August?

Response: The Reserve Center’s Training Building roof was recently replaced, inspected and confirmed that no leaks exist.

33. The SF1442 states to contact Mr. Brian Clason to arrange for a site visit. I was told by Mr. Clason that the site visit was held on 2/22, however, this solicitation did not post to sam.gov <Blockedhttp://sam.gov> until 2/25. We respectfully request a site visit be held to verify the existing conditions since the last site visit 7 months ago, as the building envelope is compromised to outside elements.

34. Provide additional direction on the extent of the wood bumper rail. Please provide locations and basis of design.

35. Restrooms and shower rooms currently have tile, should the existing tile be removed along with the accessories, fixtures and partitions for the installation of new tile? Should we expect to replace the accessories and partitions if they are to be removed. Should the locker room be included in the new tile area?

36. Is this project US Citizen only?

Response: This company must be registered in SAM.gov and must be US based. Employees must comply with requirements listed in SOW. Please refer to pages 33-35

37. Will as-builts be provided for the building with the roof replacement? If as-builts are not provided can additional information be provided to properly quantify the roof, downspout and gutter replacement.

Response: As Builds are included within the SOW RFP Appendices.

38. Can an additional site visit be set up now that the scope of work has been released.

39. (p.11 of 424) 2.1.3, Part B; This section states all equipment and air distribution systems are to be demolished and removed, however Section 6.13.2.3.3 states some ductwork should be reused.

Please confirm that all HVAC equipment and air distribution systems are to be demolished.

Response: Bid per SOW. All HVAC equipment has to be removed. For bidding purposes, assume all ductwork is demo’d and new provided.

40. (p.11 of 424) 2.1.3, Part F; Please provide location of AC-3

Response: Bid per SOW. ACU-3 and AHU-3. See page 235 of 424, grid F-4 & G-4 (note that the as-built mislabels ACU-3 as “CUA-3”.

41. (p.33 of 424) 5.11.5, Paragraph 1; ASHRAE 90.1-2013 is mentioned, however newer versions are available. Please confirm 2019 editions of ASHRAE 62.1 and 90.1 and 2018 edition ICC are acceptable for this project.

Response: Bid per SOW – The 2013 edition of 90.1 is the currently adopted energy code for the DoD.

The DoD building UFC 1-200-01 currently uses the 2018 ICC family of codes (with exceptions).

42. (p.53 of 424) Section 6.13.2.1, Paragraph 1; Please provide anticipated occupancy and equipment in each space for load calculations.

43. (p.54 of 424) Section 6.13.2.1, Paragraphs 12 and 13; Please provide indoor design conditions and occupancy schedule.

Response: Bid per SOW. Occupancy schedule will be coordinated with the COR post award. Indoor design conditions are to comply with UFC guidance per SOW.

44. (p.55 of 424) Section 6.13.2.2, Part N; Please clarify whether anti-microbial UV lamps are for keeping coils and drain pans clean or for disinfection of supplied air.

Response: Bid per SOW. Intent was for air cleaning.

45. (p.56 of 424) Section 6.13.2.3, Part M; Please clarify whether anti-microbial UV lamps are for keeping coils and drain pans clean or for disinfection of supplied air.

Response: Bid per SOW. Intent was for air cleaning.

46. Motorized damper control of each return air duct may not be cost efficient for the potential benefits on some systems. Please confirm intent to provide motorized dampers at each return air device.

Response: Bid per SOW. 5.6.2.3 is for the trunks (for example, in the outside air duct and return air duct where they connect into their respective AHU’s mixing box). 6.13.2.2.3 requires manual balancing dampers at all locations where air streams converge or diverge.

47. Will DDC controlled shutoff be acceptable for ATFP compliance?

Response: Bid per SOW. Preference is for hardwire interlock.

48. The RFP states to "perform commissioning per paragraphs 4 and 5". Please clarify the location of commissioning requirements.

Response: Bid per SOW. This refers to Parts 4 and 5 of the SOW.

49. Are we to assume a certain percentage of deteriorated/damaged PEMB purlins that will need replacement after the roofing is removed at the existing BMA building? What percentage?

Response: Bid per SOW

50. The RFP mentions that the new roof structure to be designed for 30 PSF Snow Loading for the BMA building. Are we to verify that the existing PEMB structure (purlins and frames) are designed to support this loading in addition to the roofing?

Response: if purlins are damaged due to water intrusion, then the contractor shall replace in kind damaged purlins if corrosion is present. The 30 PSF of snow load was for Metal roof panels when ordering from manufacture.

51. Are we to bring the existing PEMB up to current structural UFC code requirements (Wind, Seismic, etc.)? If so, a full review of the existing building structure will need to be made.

52. The RFP mentions rusted or damaged (non-load bearing) metal studs of the existing training building. Are we to assume a certain percentage of these studs to be replaced? What percentage?

Response: Bid per SOW https://protect-us.mimecast.com/s/lZfaCVOjlnujx2lcG8bJk?domain=6.13.2.1 https://protect-us.mimecast.com/s/lZfaCVOjlnujx2lcG8bJk?domain=6.13.2.1 https://protect-us.mimecast.com/s/lG9WCW60mouw56jsxVx9Z?domain=6.13.2.2 https://protect-us.mimecast.com/s/SsgUCXDlnpu7X4nTDrdm4?domain=6.13.2.3

53. The RFP mentions providing 5/8” gypsum board ceiling at the Vestibules, Lobby and Assembly Hall of the existing training building. Are we to assume that the existing ceiling grid/structure is adequate to support this ceiling or will supplemental framing be required?

54. The RFP mentions repair to a crack outside the corridor by the Assembly Hall of the existing training building. How big of an area are we to assume for this repair?

Response: A copy of the Floor Crack Analysis Report has been posted with these RFI’s.

55. New split system mechanical units are to be provided per RFP. We will obviously check the existing roof structure for loading of the existing training building. However, are we to bring the existing building structure (if needed) up to code or are we only to verify sections of the roof structure we are adding loading to?

Response: Contractor shall confirm loading of members if proposed equipment is heavier then existing equipment.

56. Please identify the pricing breakdown cost requested. Is a division breakdown acceptable For the (3) major price categories. Can this be provided (Labor, material, G &A) POST BID. It's difficult to get an accurate cost breakdown at the Bid time!

Response: Bid per Solicitation, a detailed breakdown may be requested

57. See 01-10-00 Page-5 2.1.3,item a. Indicates All new HVAC Equipment must be used! We cannot re-use the existing equipment, or ductwork! Please verify!

58. Please verify will the AWARD be based upon the total cost of all three.

Response: Lowest Price will be determined after technical acceptance and based upon total price

59. SF-1442 Does not indicate a Bid Bond is required, just a PIP Bond.

Response: A Payment and Performance Bond is required after award

60. Can you please identify all the items in the storage container, that will be re-used.

61. Please identify where the steel studs must be replaced. Or provide us with a percentage (Can existing light gauge metal studs be re-used).

62. REFER 5.9.1 Commissioning plan (page-23). Does the agent have to be an independent entity.

Can we use our Mechanical engineer!

Response: Bid per SOW. No, you may not.

63. Please explain item-K(Section0l-10-00, page-3)

64. Can a hardware schedule be provided for the New interior, and exterior doors! (SEE appendix I)

65. Please verify the design submissions that are required for submission.

N.B. Also; We would like to schedule a site visit for early next week. Please indicate what days are available!

66. Appendix G – Gypsum Board Layout. The Finish Legend shows two different symbols, a thick red line and a yellow highlighted field, for “Gypsum board to be provided from Finish Floor to 6” above acoustical ceiling tile.” The Finish Legend also shows a blue highlight that requires “Gypsum board to be provided from finish floor to 4’ above the finish floor.”

a. Are there a different wall construction types (or requirements) for the two different symbols?

Response: No.

b. Are all the walls covered by the yellow highlight to receive gypsum board from finish floor to 6” above the ceiling tile on both sides of the wall, with exception to the exterior walls?

Response: Thick line and yellow shade indicate drywall must be installed from finished floor to 6” above ceiling tile grid. Blue shade indicates drywall to be provided from finish floor to 4’ above finish floor. The remaining drywall is existing on walls.

c. There are walls that showing yellow highlight on one side and blue highlight on the other.

Are these walls receiving gypsum board from finish floor to 6” above ceiling on one side and gypsum board from finish floor to 4’ above the finish floor on the other?

Response: One side gets drywall to 4’ above finish floor and the other gets drywall from finish floor to 6” above ceiling grid.

d. There are walls that show yellow highlight on one side and no highlight or symbol from the Finish Legend on the other. Are these walls only receiving new gypsum wall board on the yellow highlighted side?

e. There are walls that show blue highlight on one side and no highlight or symbol from the Finish Legend on the other. Are these walls only receiving new gypsum wall board on the blue highlighted side?

Response: Areas unhighlighted area existing to remain.

f. There are interior walls showing the thick red line from the Finish Legend. Are these walls receiving new gypsum board on both sides of the wall?

Response: No. One side gets drywall to 4’ above finish floor and the other gets drywall from finish floor to 6” above ceiling grid.

67. Are the previous design drawings and/or existing as-built drawings available for the Training Building?

Are there existing as-built drawings available for the BMA building?

Response: See Appendices. Bid per SOW

68. 2.1.2 Training Building – Architecture, c. – states “replacement of 10% [door] hardware”. Appendix I indicates only two sets of doors that require door hardware. With the number of doors in this facility these two sets of doors do not seem to equate to 10%. Is there other known locations where door hardware is required?

69. 2.1.2 Training Building – Architecture, d. – states “Provide solid surface counter tops and back splashes.” It is unclear where to provide solid surface counter tops and back splashes and how many linear feet.

70. Discrepancies between 6.12.1 – Gypsum Wall Board and Appendix G.

g. Rooms required to receive new gypsum wall board from finished floor to 4’-0” AFF in section 6.12.1 BUT are illustrated to receive new gypsum board from finished floor to 6” above acoustical ceiling in appendix G: Classrooms adjacent to the Library, Library, three offices adjacent to Unit Storage.

h. Rooms required to receive new gypsum board from finished floor to 6” above acoustical ceiling in Section 6.12.1 BUT are illustrated to receive new gypsum board from finished floor to 4’-0” AFF in appendix G: Assembly.

Response: Assembly area should be ACT

71. Section 6.12.1 lists two spaces that can not be located on the appendix G plan, Copy Room and SCIF

Room. Please clarify the location these rooms.

Response: The Mail Room is located at the southeast corner of the administration area. The Copy Room is west and SCIF is north of the Mail Room.

72. Section 6.12.7.7 – Shower stalls are to receive new ceramic wall tile. Appendix H indicates the showers are not in this contract. Please clarify.

Response: Shower enclosers were replaced during the previous contract. The Contractor shall infill or replace any damaged or missing ceramic wall tile.

73. Please confirm the sustainability requirements for this and confirm what kind, if any, documentation is required for sustainability.

Response: Not required.

74. Please confirm if the DB team is to provide a hazardous material testing and reporting.

75. Please provide the Control Contractor that is currently working in the Training Building.

Response: Question unclear, no response will be given

76. After review of the site plan, will there be an area on site for an office trailer and staging area. Are existing utilities available to support the office trailer.

77. In Section 01 10 00, Page 4, it states that, “Provide wall tile in restrooms and showers with 4” x 4” x

3/8” ceramic tile on full height wall (approx. 10 feet high.)”. Are we will demo and redo the walls or are we will extend from 8’0” to 10’0”?

78. In Section 01 10 00, Page 5, 2.1.2.u, it states that, “The existing fire suppression system is currently charged.”, but in Section 01 10 00, Page 42, 6.12.10.2, it states that, “The existing suppression system is currently drained.”. Is Fire suppression charged or drained?

Response: The fire suppression system is charged. The Contractor shall drain the system and comply with the requirements stated in section 01 10 00, Page 5, 2.1.2.u for charging and certify the system.

79. Can you please provide program requirements for the occupants of this building? Once we receive the program requirements, we can ascertain whether the existing layout will function or do we need to change it Response: The programming requirements for the occupants will be coordinated through the COR post award

80. Can you provide the items list for all that is stored in a storage container so that we can ascertain if additional materials are required or not?

81. Is data or telecom work part of the scope of work of the solicitation? If yes, will the government provide any equipment or do we have to estimate providing all cabling, terminations, testing and functioning of a new IT system

82. At the site visit we found that most of the electrical wiring and outlets were already installed. Please clarify if we to demo all the existing electrical infrastructure and provide new per design or will the existing cabling and outlets be used as long as they are within code?

83. Will a dedicated quality control manager be required in addition to a superintendent on the project throughout construction?

84. Will all personnel require badged access? If you, what is the procedure to obtain badging?

85. How many designs submission is required for the project? 65%, 95% and IFC?

86. Are non-US citizens allowed to work on the project?

Response: This company must be registered in SAM.gov and must be US based. Employees must comply with requirements listed in SOW. Please refer to pages 33-35

87. Is FF&E design cost and FF&E vender review to be included.

Response: FF&E is not required.

88. Are there live CADD files for the buildings?

Response: Not available Bid per SOW.

89. Are there any existing Hazardous material surveys for each building?

Response: Amendment 1 contains the existing hazardous material reports available for the USARC.

90. Since the site visit was listed on the Pre-solicitation notice, will there be another visit schedule? The first visit was scheduled before the job was posted as a project.

91. May close out documents be provided electronically?

92. For pricing backup, you are asking for vendor quotes. Since this is a design build and nowhere near the buyout phase, is that really a requirement?

Response: It is required to support your pricing

93. For the pricing backup, can you provide an example price breakout sheet that you’re expecting to see, so that all contractors provide the same breakout? The only line items on the RFP at the moment are materials, labor, and markup. If that’s all that’s needed, that really doesn’t offer much analysis.

Response: We do not have any specific examples. Please provide an invoice, quote or information on how your prices were gathered

94. SF 1442, item 13B is not checked. Can you please clarify if a bid guarantee is required to be submitted with the proposal?

Response: We require a Performance and Payment Bond after award

95. Since no past performance questionnaire was provided in the RFP, can we use any form or should we utilize the NAVFAC/USACE Form PPQ-0?

Response: Please utilize the NAVFAC/USACE Form PPQ-0. Blank sheet will be provided with amendment

96. As we don’t want to burden past customers who have already filled out a PPQ - are we able to utilize

Past Performance Questionnaire’s that were previously completed by customers within the past two

(2) years?

Response: No, please provide current PPQs

97. The designer is not required to submit any PPQs or CPARs, is that correct? Should an SF330 be submitted for design past performance?

Response: No

98. Paragraph 2.1.3.f of SOW appears to call for a 7.5 ton ductless split system unit. Please identify a specific manufacturer and model information of an acceptable unit. We are unaware of any 7.5 ton, single ductless indoor unit configuration.

Response: Bid per SOW. See 6.13.2.8

99. Paragraph 5.3.4 Electrical work associated with HVAC. It infers that no existing circuit wiring, conduit, or devices are to be reused. Please confirm.

Response: Bid per SOW. See 6.13.3.

100. Paragraph 5.6.2.1 Insulation. In order to meet defined noise criteria elsewhere in the SOW, sound lining in the first 5 feet of duct from a fan system may be advisable. This would seem to contradict this paragraph prohibiting internally lined duct. Please advise or clarify in this regard.

Response: Bid per SOW. No lining is permitted.

101. Paragraph 5.8 - Please confirm this project will require a specific formal commissioning process including all ASHRAE defined roles, responsibilities and tasks.

102. Can an allowance be provided within the bid for item 6.13.2.9 LPG System Inspection and Repair?

This would help to reduce contract risk and overall Government cost as we would not need to add unnecessary potential risk to the project.

103. Electrical demolition section 6.13.3.2. Please confirm that the existing switch and transformers are to be reused and that new work will start at the equipment circuit breaker level and extend out to the equipment.

104. Paragraph 6.13.1.a states that all ductwork must be replaced for bidding purposes. However, on page 54 paragraph 6.13.2.3.3 states existing ductwork may be reused where possible. Please clarify which is required.

Response: For bidding purposes, assume that all ductwork will be replaced.

105. Please confirm if the SSHO can also perform the tasks of Superintendent and QC Manager? Triple

Hat.

106. SOW, para 2.1.2, item C, states to Contractor shall include proper re-installation of all Door jambs.

Previous jamb installation not properly completed, and jamb are loose and not set following GWB removal. Please provide pictures of the incorrect installation or a site visit providing adequate time will be necessary to determine the extent of the work required. This information is necessary so accurate pricing can be determined.

107. SOW, para 2.1.2, item J, states to Include all floor prep required for new flooring to include removal of existing mastic where applicable, minor floor leveling or crack patching, bead blasting, moisture content seal as required. Will quantities for bidding purposes be provided for mastic removal, floor leveling/crack patching. Without Architectural as-builts being provided it can not be determined what type of flooring or its location currently exists making above accurate quantity determinations improbable. Also, any requirement for moisture mitigation of substrate cannot be determined until existing flooring is removed and testing performed. This would then have to be priced after award.

Please advise.

108. SOW, para 2.1.2, item O, states to provide ceramic tile in the east and west vestibules. Appendix

H shows these areas to receive 12 x 12 VCT. Which flooring application is correct?

Response: Provide ceramic tile in vestibules where no tile exists, if ceramic tile exists then match existing. Install new ceramic tile base in all vestibules and match existing.

109. SOW, para 2.1.2, item Q, states to provide acoustical ceiling panels that must follow the existing

Reflected Ceiling plan drawings and to include removal and replacement of ceiling grid (all existing ceiling grid is to be removed) No existing ACT RCP was provided with the as-builts. Appendix J only shows partial areas of ACT being replaced but as stated above in item Q all grid is to be removed.

Are all ceilings being removed and replaced or are we only to demo and replace what is represented by Appendix J?

Response: you will be replacing the existing ceiling grid, however the new ceiling grid will follow the existing ceiling grid.

110. SOW, para 2.1.2, item R, states to Provide 5/8” Gypsum Board on existing framing for ceiling application at vestibules, lobby and Assembly Hall. Appendix J shows the Assembly Hall to receive ACT not GWB. Which is correct?

Response: Assembly Hall is receiving ACT. Vestibules and lobby shall get GWB.

111. SOW, para 2.1.2, item U, states the existing fire suppression system is currently charged. When installing the ceiling tiles and gypsum board, contractor is to ensure sprinkler heads are installed in accordance with local, state, federal codes, ect. This scope only includes reinstallation of pendant heads in locations where ceilings are being replaced. Since no sprinkler drawings were provided the government will need to provide quantities of sprinkler heads to be installed for bidding purposes.

Further, it says the systems is charged. Who will be responsible for draining and refilling the system so sprinkler heads can be moved? The para also states to pressure test after work complete. If drained to do work it would have to be refilled to do pressure test. Also a conflict is noted in 6.12.10.2 which states system is currently drained as opposed to charged in para 2.1.2. Which is it?

Response: The fire suppression system is charged. The Contractor shall drain the system and comply with the requirements stated in section 01 10 00, Page 5, 2.1.2.u for charging and certify the system.

112. SOW, para 2.1.2, item U, states Awarded contractor shall clean, re-assemble, and reinstall stored items in Training Building. A log of stored materials and location of storage will need to be provided so accurate pricing can be determined.

113. SOW, para 2.1.3, item B, states requirement for Demolition and removal of all existing equipment, air distribution, roof penetrations and pads. SOW, para 6.13.1, will require demo of HVAC that is in areas where, according to Appendix J, the ceilings are not to be replaced. Is Appendix J correct or are all ceiling in the entire building to be replace to accommodate HVAC complete demo and replacement?

Response: Bid per SOW. Ceiling replacement shall match existing conditions, as applicable.

114. SOW, para 6.12.5.2, states to provide in the Mailroom a countertop with bracket supports. Provide blocking behind gypsum wall board and attach to stub frame. Please provide construction details of countertop, length of countertop and bracket support details so accurate pricing can be determined.

Response: Contractor shall provide wood blocking between stud framing. This is a typical detail

115. SOW, para 6.12.7.7, states to Provide wall tile in restroom and showers with 4” x 4” x 3/8”on full height wall ceramic tile. Is this statement correct? Are we supposed to replace all tile “ON” existing tile or is existing tile to be removed and the new tile placed on existing substrate?

116. SOW, para 6.13.1, item B, states to remove all duct insulation. Previous states indicate to remove all Mechanical/HVAC. Is all sheet metal duct to be removed also?

Response: Bid as shown. For bidding purposes, assume all ductwork must be removed.

117. Please provide extent of all architectural demo, type of finishes, and all room locations.

Response: For BMA the interior architectural demo is 1 foot below underside of structure of drywall.

118. 2.1.1 BMA Building. Please confirm we are to reuse the existing roof decking. If there is any damage to the existing decking, please provide a quantity to be replaced.

Response: For biding purposes, the Contractor shall assume to reuse the existing roof decking. If it is determined during construction activities that the roof decking is damaged then the Contractor shall coordinate the replacement of the damaged roof decking with the COR.

119. 6.13.2.10 Controls and Instrumentation. Please advise if there is an existing DDC system in the building. If so, who is the manufacturer/installer?

Response: No system exists at the facility.

120. Initial Site Visit was scheduled prior to the release of the Solicitation. Will another site visit be held to verify/inspect the SOW provided by the Solicitation and can the RFI cut off date of 3/4/22 be extended to allow for questions after a 2nd Site Visit or questions as they relate to the overall Solicitation requirements?

121. The SF 1442 indicates the Proposal due date is 3/28/22. However, no time of day for submission has been indicated. Please provide the time of day by which proposals are to be submitted/received.

Response: Amendment will include an extension to the due date and the time will be shared

122. Has a CCL or range of cost been established for the Design Build project under this Solicitation?

Response: Instructions should be on the front sheet of the SF1442. Construction Magnitude is $1M - $5M

123. Section 00 21 00 – Instructions to Offerors, item 2. Price Schedule, Para 1 “Note”, states to submit your price schedule with sufficient backup documentation to enable us to do a thorough analysis of the proposed offer (price). Ex: If the offer includes materials, the supporting documentation would include vendor quotes. Seeing that this Solicitation is for a competitive bid for a single project, the above information would not typically be required for price submission. This would normally be a requirement for Solicitations involving SATOC, JOC or other sole source proposals which would utilitize line item, m, l, e, g&a breakdowns associated with the likes of R.S. Means, 4eClicks, etc.. Can this pricing requirement information be waived for this competitive bid Solicitation?

Response: No

124. Solicitation document, Section 01 10 00, pg 3 of 47, Bidding Schedule – The bidding schedule provided in this section differs from the bidding schedule found in SOW document, Section 01 10 00, pg 5 of 424. The Sol doc contains 1 item for total price and 3 CLINs 0001 thru 0003. The SOW doc just contains 1 item for total price. Which Bidding Schedule are we to use and submit?

Response: Submit the schedule in the SF1442 CLIN 0001 thru 0003

125. Will all FF&E and all other movable items be removed from the areas of construction in both buildings prior to the contractor starting any work?

Response: FF&E not required. Bid per SOW.

126. Please provide Architectural as-builts for both the Training bldg. and the OMS Roof project. These drawings are necessary to determine all existing conditions and current construction details as the apply to the new SOW so accurate pricing can be determined.

Response: Available as-builts are provided within the Appendices. Bid per SOW.

127. There are as-built dwgs provided in Appendix C, pgs 243 – 245, that indicate they are for a

Maintenance Shop at Ft. Lee. Per the Sol, both the Training building and the OMS building are located at Ft AP Hill. Further these drawings to not show any details that would provide the necessary information for replacing a roof. Please provide asbuilt drawings for the OMS building at Ft AP Hill and ensure they provide all roof and/or interior details as required so accurate pricing can be determined.

Response: Fort Lee drawing sheets to be omitted from SOW. Available as-builts are provided within the Appendices.

128. SOW, para 2.1.1, item F, states to provide Kraft blanket insulation R-value R-30 to underside of standing seam metal roof. SOW 6.5 ROOF THERMAL INSULATION states to provide flexible blanket faced with a flexible vapor retarder. Exposed insulation shall have a white non-dusting and non-shedding finish. Please confirm the insulation to be provided is vinyl scrim faced R30 which is typical for this type of installation?

Response: Yes, please provide vinyl scrim faced R30.

129. SOW, para 2.1.2, item A, states to provide 5/8” Gypsum Wall Board (GWB) on existing steel stud framing for walls and ceilings. Several locations of stud framing were damaged during the previous contract or rusted from a water incident. This contract shall include replacement of those members.

Will the government be providing quantities and room locations where the stud framing is damaged?

This information is necessary so accurate pricing can be determined. If quantities cannot be provided, pictures of all affected areas or a site visit providing adequate time will be necessary to determine the extent of the work required.

Response: USACE is aware of a few areas where the metal sill track had rust which was approx.

15-0” of metal sill track.

130. Is there an available sign in sheet that can be distributed of the 22 FEB 22 site walk?

Response: Yes, see attachment 1

131. The Section 13B of the SF 1442 is not completed, is a bid bond need for this project?

Response: Performance and Payment Bonds are required after award

132. Section 11 of the SF 1442 states contract performance to begin within 10 days and contract completion within 365 days but Section 52.211-110 states the following:

The Contractor shall be required to (a) commence work under this contract within 365 calendar days after the date the Contractor receives the notice to proceed, (b) prosecute the work diligently, and (c) complete the entire work ready for use not later than 365 days.

* The time stated for completion shall include final cleanup of the premises.

*The Contracting Officer shall specify either a number of days after the date the contractor receives the notice to proceed, or a calendar date.

o Section 52.211-110 seems subject to interpretation; would the contract period be 365 days after approval of the design documents or 365 days to include the design documents?

Design Period would be approximately 180 days on average.

With manufacture lead times in HVAC and Metal Products, construction period would need the 365 days to complete.

Response: PoP is 365 days including design and construction

133. The site walk alluded to a past project that was issued and not awarded last fiscal year due to

Technical Package Issues, can the RFI’s and answers from that bid be released since this is basically a re-bid of that project?

Response: Previous solicitation was cancelled. Additional information is provided with this amendment, not all RFIs will apply.

134. Can an option for HVAC Alternate be included in the price schedule?

This project and lay-out would be optimal for a VRF system to replace the existing smaller systems.

Response: No VRF will be permitted.

135. I was informed that a roof was recently replaced on the building, is that a true statement?

If so, can you provide the contractor who holds the warranty?

o To remove the existing furnaces and all the existing flues properly, the roof would have to be repaired where the flues exit the roof.

Or does the government want to abandon the flues in place and make weathertight?

Response: Yes. The training building’s roof was replaced and the 99th should have the warranty.

136. Will base badging be required to access the site during construction services?

Response: No, site is accessible from public road

SITE VISIT

SITE VISIT: 0900 at the location on 31 March 2022

Contractors don’t have to go through the post to get there to the Taleferro Trail. Please Google the USARC Building with the address on the SOW. Apple iPhone may give you incorrect directions

Additional RFIs are due 4 April 2022 by 4PM. Contractors are limited to 5 questions, anything over 5 will not get responses.

SECTION 00 10 00 - SOLICITATION

The Issued By organization has changed from

USACE, PHILADELPHIA

WANAMAKER BUILDING

100 PENN SQUARE EAST

PHILADELPHIA PA 19107

to

US ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT, PHILADELPHIA

POC: TIFFANY Z. CHISHOLM WANAMAKER BUILDING 1

UARE EAST

PHILADELPHIA PA 19107-3390

The required performance has changed from Project:

AP Hill Interior design build project Renovations/OMS Roof/HVAC in accordance with the scope of work

Solicitation Date 25 February 2022; proposals are due 28 March 2022 at the end of the solicitation period. All RFIs are due 4 March 2022. RFIs are limited to 10 for each potential offeror.

This procurement is restricted 8(a) competitive with selection determination by Lowest Price Technically

Acceptable.

**See Section L and Section M for non cost evaluation factors and instructions

**NAICS 236220

***PLEASE READ INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

**Site visits encouraged and scheduled 22 Feb 2022;

Please contact: Brian N Clason; phone 215-656-6783; email brian.n.clason@usace.army.mil

US. Army Corps of Engineers, Philadelphia District, 100 Penn Square East, Philadelphia, PA 19107 to Project:

AP Hill Interior design build project Renovations/OMS Roof/HVAC in accordance with the scope of work

Solicitation Date 25 February 2022; Amendment 1 issued 22 March 2022. Proposals are due 18 April 2022 at 1700

EST, the end of the solicitation period. All RFIs are due 4 April 2022. RFIs are limited to 5 for each potential offeror.

This procurement is restricted 8(a) competitive with selection determination by Lowest Price Technically

Acceptable.

**See Section L and Section M for non cost evaluation factors and instructions

**NAICS 236220

***PLEASE READ INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

**Site visits encouraged and an addtional visit is scheduled for 31 March 2022;

Please contact: Adrian Saguil email: Adrian.Saguil@usace.army.mil

US. Army Corps of Engineers, Philadelphia District, 100 Penn Square East, Philadelphia, PA 19107.

mailto:brian.n.clason@usace.army.mil mailto:Adrian.Saguil@usace.army.mil

SECTION 00 21 00 - INSTRUCTIONS

The following have been modified:

SECTION L

SECTION II

SOLICITATION PROVISIONS

A. PROPOSAL SUBMISSION (Section L)

The proposal preparation instructions are contained in Section L of the Request for Proposal (RFP) and are herein incorporated by reference. INFORMATIONAL TEXT

IMPORTANT NOTES REGARDING THIS ACQUISITION:

A. The following documentation must be submitted with your offer for evaluation:

SF 1442, Solicitation, Offer and Award Price Schedule Price Schedule-prices must be submitted by breakdown of cost to unit level including Materials, Labor and Overhead (G&A).

This source selection is restricted to 8a small business firms under NAICS 236220. The evaluation process is Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA)

Spreadsheet or PDF document proposal must be submitted via email submission by the Proposal due date, 18 April 2022.

Technical acceptability will be evaluated by the following non-cost factors:

1) **Three (3) past successful similar jobs are to be shown.

Successful jobs are defined as a minimum of one (1) satisfactory CPARs Rating and two past performance questionnaires from completed jobs. More CPARs ratings may be submitted in-lieu of past performance questionnaires, but no higher rating will be given in the evaluation.

Similar jobs are defined as design build interior renovations work on a minimum 10,000 square foot Scope performed in office use buildings. The 8a Contractor shall show the competency to manage multiple disciplined design-build jobs consisting of HVAC demolition and replacement, interior renovations, and roof replacements. At least two (2) jobs must have an HVAC demo/replacement/upgrade and at least one (1) job must have a standing seam metal roof replacement. MATOC & SATOC Work will be counted at the task order level.

2)**Technical and Design capability identified by three past similar design build jobs which must be referenced in the proposal. A description for technical and design capability is required with reference to the three successful projects for technical acceptability. Factor 2 jobs need not be the same as Factor 1.

Similar jobs are defined as designs of HVAC demo/replacement and interior renovations/install interior finishes of office buildings with a minimum of 10,000 Square Feet space. Two (2) Jobs must include a HVAC demo/replacement/upgrade component.

One (1) Job must have a standing seam metal roof design included. MATOC & SATOC Work will be counted at the task order level.

3)** Minimum $3 million bonding capability must be stated in the proposal

Proposals may be submitted to Cherita L. Williams at cherita.l.williams@usace.army.mil or Tiffany Chisholm tiffany.z.chisholm@usace.army.mil. DODSAFE will be used for all proposal submiissions. Contact Tiffany Chisholm in order to receive the DODSafe link.

NO OTHER PERSONS ARE AUTHORIZED TO RECEIVE PROPOSALS FOR THIS

SOLICITATION.

All amendments (if any) must be acknowledged Note: On the SF 1442 be sure to include: company name, address, tax identification number, DUNS number, and Cage Code. Please submit your price schedule with sufficient backup documentation to enable us to do a thorough analysis of the proposed offer (price). Ex: If the offer includes materials, the supporting documentation would include vendor quotes. Also, if travel is necessary, the travel costs should be documented in compliance with the Joint Travel Regulations.

EVIDENCE OF AUTHORITY TO SIGN BIDS/PROPOSALS

Evidence of the authority of individuals signing bids/proposals to submit firm bids/proposals on behalf of the bidder/offeror is required except where the bid/offer is signed, and shows that it is so signed, by:

The President, Vice-President, or Secretary of lncorporated bidders; a partner in case of partnership; the owner in the case of sole proprietorships. Failure to submit with the bid satisfactory evidence of authority of all other persons may be cause for rejection of bid as an invalid or non-responsive bid.

(End of Summary of Changes)

ATTACHMENTS

The following documents are attached to this amendment:

1. Sign-in sheet from 2/22/2022 site…