W912BU-16-R-0048_Amendment_0004.pdf

W25PHS60696869

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to update the Point of Contact for any submissions to Megan McMullen w ho can be reached at Megan.M.McMullen@usace.army.mil. Section L has been upated w ith this change. These changes have been made in red.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 8

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 08-Jul-2016

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W912BU-16-R-0048

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

24-May-2016

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

08-Jul-2016

CODE

US ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT, PHILADELPHIA

POC: AARON SANNUTTI

WANAMAKER BLDG

100 PENN SQUARE EAST

PHILADELPHIA PA 19107-3390

W912BU 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W912BU-16-R-0048

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS

The following have been modified:

SECTION L

1.0 OVERVIEW

The Government will evaluate proposals in accordance with the evaluation criteria and the evaluation rating system described in Section M, Evaluation Factors for Award.

2.0 BASIS OF AWARD

In accordance with FAR 15.101-2, award will be made on the basis of the lowest evaluated price of proposals meeting or exceeding the acceptability standards for non-cost factors.

3.1 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

3.2 The Government intends to make a contract award without discussions except when the Government determines that it is in its best interest to hold discussions. Proposals should be submitted initially on the most favorable terms from a price and technical standpoint. Do not assume that Offerors will be contacted or afforded an opportunity to clarify, discuss or revise their proposals.

3.3 Technical and Price proposals shall be submitted in two separate volumes. Two volumes are required so that the technical and price reviews can be accomplished by different staff. Each proposal shall be clearly marked as to its content, i.e., project title, solicitation number, name and address of the Offeror, price proposal or technical proposal.

3.3 Offerors shall submit three (3) hard copies of their proposal and one (1) additional electronic copy.

Hard copy proposals shall be delivered to the following by the date and time listed in block 9 of the SF33:

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Philadelphia District Attn: Megan M. McMullen 100 Penn Square East, Wanamaker Building, Room 643 Philadelphia, PA 19107-3390

Please note: Hard Copies of the offeror’s proposal must be received by the date and time listed in block 9 of the SF33 in order to be found responsive.

One (1) Electronic copy of the offeror’s proposal shall be submitted by the date and time listed in block 9 of the SF33 to the following:

Megan.M.McMullen@usace.army.mil

If there are any amendments to this requirement, all amendments must be acknowledged, signed and submitted with the bid at the time of proposal due date.

Requests for Information (RFI) are due no later than 15 days after the original posted date of the solicitation. RFI’s must be submitted no later than 1400 hours (2:00PM) EST on that date, and any RFI’s submitted after this deadline may not be acknowledged. All RFI’s shall be submitted electronically to the following:

Megan.M.McMullen@usace.army.mil

4.0 PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

Proposals must meet all of the acceptability standards of the non-cost evaluation factors and sub-factors listed below to be considered acceptable. Proposals which do not meet all of the acceptability standards of the non-cost evaluation factors and sub-factors listed below will be unacceptable and will not be eligible for award.

4.0.1 FACTOR 1 – TECHNICAL CAPABILITY

4.0.1.1 SUB FACTOR 1A –

EXPERIENCE

Facility

The Offeror’s proposal shall include a discussion of direct contract supervision experience during the past five years the building of at least two aluminum vessels 50 feet long or longer, with 25 knot minimum top speed and with comparable outfit and systems to the requirements in this specification. The Offeror shall describe the principal dimensions, speed, outfit and systems of the vessels built and provide a list of the vessels owners. The facility where the vessels are to be built shall be clearly identified to include an overall description.

Design

The Offerors’ proposal shall also include a discussion of the designer’s experience in designing at least five alumimum vessels, 50 feet or longer, in the past fifteen years that have been built and put into successful service. The vessels owners shall be identified. The Offeror shall describe the principal dimensions, speed, outfit and systems of the vessels designed and built.

If the Offeror is using a sub-contractor to meet the design element, a signed letter of commitment from the designer is required in addition to the above. (Attachment A). The Offeror shall also confirm that the sub-contractors design will not be altered during construction.

MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS

At least two aluminum vessels 50 feet or longer with comparable outfit and systems to the requirements in this specification built in the past five years.

At least five similar vessels, 50 feet or longer, designed in the last fifteen years that have been built and put into successful service.

4.0.1.2 SUB FACTOR 1B – PRODUCT

The Offeror shall provide a narrative overview of the proposed vessel to include key features. The Offeror shall demonstrate that they can meet all requirements in Section C while meeting the speed requirement through a combination of the dimensionalized general arrangement drawing of the proposed vessel, a narrative discussion, and supporting documentation.

The Offeror’s proposal shall include a dimensionalized general arrangement drawing of the proposed vessel.

The Offeror shall provide a narrative discussion, with any supporting documentation, explaining the Offeror’s approach to assuring that the speed requirement will be met. The narrative must address weight management during design and construction.

Vessel meets the specification requirements to include, but not limited to, speed (25 to 30 knots at

90% power), length (62 to 65 feet bow to transom) and beam (20 feet maximum, fender to fender).

4.0.2 FACTOR 2 - PAST PERFORMANCE

The Proposal must include information about at least two (2), but no more than five (5), projects completed within the last five (5) years using the attached Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) forms (Attachment B). In lieu of submitting Past Performance questionnaires, Offerors may provide completed questionnaires from the Construction Contractor Appraisal Support System (CCASS), or Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) on a “one for one” basis. In other words, one (1) completed CCASS or CPARS questionnaire shall satisfy the requirement for one

(1) PPQ.

Past Performance information is not the same as experience information. Experience information pertains to what types of work an Offeror has performed. Past Performance pertains to how well an Offeror performs project work.

As noted above, Past Performance pertains to how well an Offeror has performed relevant past work that is an indicator of future performance. There are two aspects to the past performance evaluation.

The first is to evaluate whether the Offeror’s past performance is relevant or not relevant to the effort to be acquired. For the purpose of this evaluation, relevancy of the projects provided on past performance questionnaires will be evaluated based on their similarity to the technical work required by this solicitation. Therefore, the projects selected for submission must represent the Offeror’s relevant Past Performance. The second aspect is to determine how well the contractor performed on the contracts. The Government will consider the currency and relevance of the information, source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in contractor performance.

The Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) included in the solicitation is provided for the Offeror or its team members to submit to the client for each project the Offeror includes in its proposal the Past Performance evaluation factor.

Ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact.

Completed Past Performance Questionnaires should be submitted with your proposal. If the Offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the Offeror should complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ (Attachment B), which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires.

If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government's point of contact, via email at Megan.M.McMullen@usace.army.mil prior to proposal closing date. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation. In addition to the above, the Government may review any other sources of information for evaluating past performance. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), including Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), using all CAGE/DUNS numbers of team members (partnership, joint venture, teaming arrangement, or parent company/subsidiary/affiliate) identified in the Offeror’s proposal, inquiries of owner representative(s), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), and any other known sources not provided by the Offeror.

In order for the Offeror’s past performance to be considered acceptable, the information provided on the Offeror’s past performance questionnaires, in addition to any information obtained by the Government through the sources identified above, shall provide the Government with a reasonable expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the work required.

Offerors are reminded that while the Government may elect to consider past performance information obtained from other sources, the primary responsibility for providing past performance information rests with the Offeror. In the case of an Offeror that does not have a record of relevant past performance, or for whom information on past performance is not available, the Offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably as concerns its past performance. In situations of this kind, the adjective rating of acceptable will be applied to the evaluation factor of Past Performance.

4.0.3 FACTOR 3 - PRICE

The Government will evaluate proposals for the purpose of determining the reasonableness and completeness of the prices offered. Offerors must submit the properly filled out and executed SF 33, along with the Price Proposal Schedule and executed Bid Bond.

ATTACHMENT A – SUB-CONTRACTOR LETTER OF COMMITMENT

TO: Contracting Officer

SUBJECT: Letter of Commitment for Proposed Contract for ____________________

Dear Sir or Madam:

I hereby make the unequivocal commitment that, in the event of an award of a contract to (Fill in name of Proposer), that (insert name of design firm) will fulfill the duties of (state role on a project).

Sincerely, (Authorized Official)

Date: __________

Attachment B – Past Performance Questionnaire

USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ-0)

CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)

1. Contractor Information Firm Name: Cage Code:

Address: DUNs Number:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:

2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain) Percent of project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):

Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please specify):

Contract Title:

Contract Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Explain Differences:

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):

Explain Differences:

4. Project Description:

Complexity of Work High Med Routine How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)

CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)

5. Client Information Name:

Title:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

6. Describe the client’s role in the project:

7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):

8. Client’s Signature:

(End of Summary of Changes)