Industry Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 104 KB Posted

Attached to
Ft Harrison, MT Veteran’s Affairs Medical Center (VAMC) Seismic Upgrade and Specialty Care Improvements; Phase I - Design-Build Central Utility Plant (CUP) and Parking Garage (PG)
Solicitation number
W9128F23R0042
Issued by

About this file

Written by GovTribe AI ·

This document contains an industry questionnaire related to federal contract opportunity W9128F23R0042 for design and construction services at the Ft Harrison, Montana Veteran's Affairs Medical Center. The questionnaire seeks industry feedback on several aspects of the upcoming solicitation, including the sufficiency of information provided in the draft RFP, the proposed timeline for proposal development and submission, availability of labor and materials, anticipated challenges, bonding and permitting needs, risk assessment, price escalation considerations, impact of including the parking garage as an option, potential for early site work and mobilization, and topics for discussion during a pre-bid site visit. The contracting agency, the Army Corps of Engineers Engineering District Omaha, appears interested in industry input to facilitate a successful procurement for the seismic upgrade and specialty care improvements project.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
23R0042_AMENDED_REVISED_Pre-Solicitation_Notice-FTH_CUP_2024.01.08.docx DOCX document
23R0042 AMENDED REVISED Pre-Solicitation Notice FTH CUP.pdf PDF
Pre-Solicitation_Notice_W9128F23R0042_FTH_CUP-PG 14SEP2023.docx DOCX document
23R0042 Site Plan re CUP-PG.pdf PDF
REVISED Pre-Solicitation_Notice_W9128F23R0042_FTH_CUP-PG.pdf PDF
Pre-Solicitation_Notice_W9128F23R0042_FTH_CUP-PG.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

W9128F23R0042

Pre-Solicitation - Industry Questionnaire

• Is the information presented in the RFP sufficient for preparation of Phase I and Phase II proposals? If not, what is missing or insufficient?

• Is the proposed timeline for development and submission of proposals adequate?

• Is the availability of labor and/or materials a significant issue in the current market? What procurement or delivery options, if any, can be instituted to reduce the negative impacts on construction schedule and/or costs resulting from these shortages?

• What would you consider to be the biggest challenge for your company to participate in this design-build project?

• Do you anticipate any difficulty in obtaining the needed bonding or permitting for this work?

• Do you consider the risk higher on this design-build project as compared to any other design-build projects? If so, why?

• Where do you see the greatest risk for bidding this project and what could be done to reduce it?

• Do you feel that adding price escalation clauses may help reduce the bids?

• Would such a significant portion of work as the Parking Garage listed as an Option discourage industry participation?

• With an anticipated award date of April 2024, given the Government’s allowance for Fast Tracking, what, if any, mobilization, and site work would start before winter 2024?

• Is there anything specific you’ll want to see during a pre-bid site visit?

• Any other suggestions on how can we, as a team, work together and proceed to a successful procurement?

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .