Am_0004.pdf

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

FACILITY CODE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required) copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15C. DATE SIGNED

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

PAGE OF PAGES

6. ISSUED BY CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)

CODE

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

Previous edition unusable

Amendment No.0004 W9128F

PHYSICAL FITNESS FACILITY, PN058139

FORT CARSON, COLORADO

See attached documentation for content of the amendment revisions to solicitation.

Date for receipt of proposals is 13 APR 2021 at 1400 hours

Government Point of Contact: Bill Rawe, Contract Specialist, William.T.Rawe@usace.army.mil_

U.S ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, OMAHA DISTRICT

CONTRACTING OFFICE

5475 Tech Center Drive, Suite 205 Colorado Springs, CO 80919

See Item 6

W9128F-21-R-0002

04/09/2021

03/04/2021

04/09/2021

Am #0004 - 2 (Continuation of SF 30)

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

Omaha District, Corps of Engineers

1616 Capitol Avenue Omaha, Nebraska 68102-4901

:NOTICE: Failure to acknowledge : Solicitation No. W9128F-21-R-0002 :all amendments may cause rejec-:

:tion of the bid. See FAR : Date of Issue: 4 MAR 2021 :52.214-3 of Section 00 21 00. : Date of Opening:

13 APR 2021

Amendment No. 0004

9 APR 2021

SUBJECT: Amendment No. 0004 to Specifications and Drawings for Design and Construction of PHYSICAL FITNESS FACILITY AT FORT CARSON, COLORADO

TO: Prospective Offerors and Others Concerned

1. The specifications and drawings for subject project are hereby modified as follows (revise all specification indices, attachment lists, and drawing indices accordingly).

a. Specifications (New and/or Revised and Reissued). Delete and substitute or add specification pages as noted below. The substituted pages are revised and reissued with this amendment. Sections should have changes tracked within them but all language shall apply regardless of the accuracy of this effort.

Pages Deleted Pages Substituted or Added 00 10 00 00 10 00* 00 22 00 00 22 00 03 45 00 03 45 00* 10 51 13 10 51 13* 11 31 13 11 31 13* 26 20 00 26 20 00*

2. This amendment is a part of the bidding papers and its receipt shall be acknowledged on the Standard Form 1442. All other conditions and requirements of the specifications remain unchanged.

3. Bids will be received until 2:00 p.m., local time at place of bid opening, 13 APR 2021.

Attachments:

Specification Pages listed in 1.a., above

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Omaha District 1616 Capitol Avenue Omaha, Nebraska 68102-4901

9 APR 2021

jlb/2099

00 10 00 - 1

SOLICITATION, OFFER

AND AWARD

(Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

1. SOLICITATION NO.

W9128F-21-R-0002

2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

SEALED BID (IFB)

NEGOTIATED (RFP)

3. DATE ISSUED

4 MAR 2021

PAGES OF PAGES

IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by offeror.

4. CONTRACT NO. 5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NO. 6. PROJECT NO.

7. ISSUED BY CODE CT 8. ADDRESS OFFER TO

U.S.ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, OMAHA

Contracting Division (CENWO-CT-M) 5475 Tech Center Drive, Suite 205 Colorado Springs, CO 80919

U.S.ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, OMAHA

Attn: CONTRACTING DIVISION (CENWO-CT-M) 5475 Tech Center Drive, Suite 205 Colorado Springs, CO 80919

9. FOR INFORMATION

E-MAIL:

A. NAME

Bill Rawe

B. E-MAIL ADDRESS

william.t.rawe@usace.army.mil

SOLICITATION

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".

10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS (Title, identifying no., date):

The offeror hereby agrees to do all work described in the documents entitled:

PHYSICAL FITNESS FACILITY

PN058139 (FY21)

FORT CARSON, COLORADO

RETURN WITH OFFER: INFORMATION REQUIRED BY SECTION 00 10 00 (SF1442 AND CLIN PRICING SCHEDULE)

THIS SOLICITATION IS UNRESTRICTED AND OPEN TO BOTH LARGE AND SMALL BUSINESS PARTICIPATION.

11. The Contractor shall begin performance within 10 calendar days and complete it within 540* calendar days after receiving award, notice to proceed. This performance period is mandatory, negotiable. (* - See notes below 00 10 00-3 CLIN Pricing Schedule)

12A. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS?

(If "YES," indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12B.)

YES NO

12B. CALENDAR DAYS

13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:

A. Sealed offers in original and *See Block 10 copies to perform the work required are due at the place specified in Item 8 by 1400 (hour) local time 13 APR 2021. If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers must be publicly opened at that time. Sealed envelopes containing offers shall be marked to show the offeror's name and address, the solicitation number, and the date and time offers are due.

B. An offer guarantee is is not required.

C. All offers are subject to the (1) work requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.

D. Offers providing less than ___90_____ calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due will not be considered and will be rejected.

NSN 7540-01-155-3212 1442-101 STANDARD FORM 1442(REV. 4-85)

Prescribed by GSA FAR(48 CFR) 53.236-1(d)

Am_0004

00 10 00 - 2

14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR (Include ZIP Code) 15. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code)

DUNS Number:

16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS (Include only if different than Item 14)

CODE FACILITY CODE

17. The offeror agrees to perform the work required at the prices specified below in strict accordance with the terms of this solicitation, if this offer is accepted by the Government in writing within 90 calendar days after the date offers are due.

AMOUNTS

SEE ATTACHED CLIN PRICING SCHEDULE

Contractor’s Fax No. CAGE CODE Contractor’s E-Mail address

18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.

19. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation - give number and date of each)

AMENDMENT NO.

DATE

20A. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN OFFER

(Type or print)

20B. SIGNATURE 20C. OFFER DATE

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

21. ITEMS ACCEPTED:

22. AMOUNT 23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

24. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN

(4 copies unless otherwise specified)

ITEM

25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PURSUANT TO

10 U.S.C. 2304(c) ( ) 41 U.S.C. 253(c) ( )

26. ADMINISTERED BY CODE 27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY

U.S. Army Engineer District, Omaha 1616 Capitol Ave.

Omaha, Nebraska 68102-4901

USAED Omaha c/o USACE Finance Center 5722 Integrity Drive Millington, TN 38054-5005

CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE

28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT (contractor is required to sign this document and return _______ copies to issuing office.) Contractor agrees to furnish and deliver all items or perform all work, requisitions identified on this form and any continuation sheets for the consideration stated in this contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract shall be governed by (a) this contract award,

(b) the solicitation, and (c) the clauses, representations, certifications, and specifications incorporated by reference in or attached to this contract.

29. AWARD (Contractor is not required to sign this document.) Your offer on this solicitation, is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This award consummates the contract, which consists of (a) the Government solicitation and your offer, and (b) this contract award. No further contractual document is necessary.

30A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED

TO SIGN (Type or print)

31A. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

30B. SIGNATURE 30C. DATE 31B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

BY

31C. AWARD DATE

STANDARD FORM 1442 BACK (REV. 4-85)

PRICING SCHEDULE

ITEM

NO.

DESCRIPTION ESIMATED

QUANTITY

UNIT UNIT

PRICE

ESTIMATED AMOUNT

BASIC ITEMS

Entire work complete to Construct Physical Fitness Facility, extending to 5’ outside the building

(MILCON)

Job

XXX

complete to Construct Sitework, from the 5’ line outside the PFF to the limits of construction

(MILCON)

TOTAL BASIC AMOUNT (ITEMS 0001 AND 0002) $_____________________________

OPTION ITEMS

[Option]

Procure and Install A/V Equipment

(OMA)

[Option]

Procure and Install ESS Equipment

(OMA)

TOTAL AMOUNT OPTIONS (ITEMS 0003 THRU 0004) $_________________________________

TOTAL AMOUNT BASIC PLUS OPTIONS (ITEMS 0001 THRU 0004) $___________________________

Proposed period of performance: _______ calendar days (after Notice to Proceed) This duration should not exceed the benchmark 520 540 days. See Note 4 below.

NOTES:

1. See 00 21 00, INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS for evaluation of options. The Government reserves the right to exercise the options up to 365 calendar days after Notice to Proceed is given for this project. The period of performance will be extended by 180 calendar days in the event an option is exercised.

2. Prices must be entered for all items of the schedule. Total amounts submitted without prices being entered on individual items will be rejected. In case of variation between the Job (lump-sum) prices and the total amount, the Job (lump-sum) prices will be considered the price submitted. In case of variation between the unit prices and the extensions, the unit prices will be considered the price submitted.

3. A modification to a proposal which provides for a single adjustment to the total amounts, should state the application of the adjustment to each respective Job (lump-sum) price and unit price affected. If the modification is not so apportioned, the single adjustment will be applied to Item No. 0001.

4. The Offeror shall propose a total integrated contract duration in number of calendar days after the Notice to Proceed (NTP) is received by the Contractor. The total number of proposed calendar days for construction through completion, ready for turnover should not exceed the benchmark duration of 520 540 calendar days.

The proposed duration shall become the required contract duration. The Government may issue the NTP via e-mail or Facsimile (FAX) or by other means. Day number 1 is the day after the date of receipt of the NTP.

See Section 00 73 00, paragraph 1.1: COMMENCEMENT, PROSECUTION AND COMPLETION OF

WORK.

Section 00 22 00 W9128F-21-R-0002

Section 00 22 00 Page 1

00SECTION 00 22 00 PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS, EVALUATION CRITERIA AND BASIS OF

AWARD

1.0 OVERVIEW

2.0 BASIS OF AWARD

3.0 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

4.0 PROPOSAL INFORMATION AND RELATED EVALUATION FACTORS AND SUBFACTORS

4.1. VOLUME 1 -TAB A – SUBFACTOR 1 - SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE

4.2. VOLUME 1 - TAB B – SUBFACTOR 2 – PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN

4.3. VOLUME 1 - TAB C – SUBFACTOR 3 - KEY PERSONNEL CAPABILITIES AND EXPERIENCE

4.4. VOLUME 1 – TAB D – SUBFACTOR 4 – SMALL BUSINESS PARTICIPATION

5.0 VOLUME 2 – FACTOR 2 - PAST PERFORMANCE

5.1. VOLUME 2 – TAB A – PAST PERFORMANCE

6.0 VOLUME 3 – PRICE AND PRO FORMA INFORMATION

6.1. GENERAL

6.2. TAB A – FACTOR 3 – PRICE (STANDARD FORM 1442, PROPOSAL DATA SHEET AND CONTRACT

LINE ITEM SCHEDULE)

6.3. TAB B – EVIDENCE OF BONDABILITY

6.4. TAB C– REQUIRED PRE-AWARD INFORMATION

7.0 EVALUATION PROCEDURES

7.1. SOURCE SELECTION EVALUATION BOARD (SSEB)

7.2. EVALUATION

7.3. DEFINITIONS

7.4. EVALUATION RATING SYSTEM

7.5. PAST PERFORMANCE CONFIDENCE ASSESSMENT RATING SYSTEM

ATTACHMENTS

1 - NOT USED

2 - NOT USED

3 - COMPANY SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE CONSTRUCTION OR PRIME CONTRACTOR

4 - NOT USED

5 – COMPANY SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE KEY SUBCONTRACTOR

Section 00 22 00 Page 2

6 - PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION TELEPHONE INTERVIEW QUESTIONNAIRE

7 - KEY PERSONNEL RESUME

8 - LETTER OF COMMITMENT FOR KEY PERSONNEL

9 - LETTER OF COMMITMENT FOR KEY SUBCONTRACTOR

10 - PROPOSAL DATA SHEETS

Section 00 22 00 Page 3

1.0 OVERVIEW

1.1. This is a “Best Value-Tradeoff” solicitation for the Construction of the Physical Fitness Center, Ft Carson, CO. The Government will evaluate the proposals in accordance with the criteria described herein, and award a firm-fixed-price contract to the responsible offeror whose proposal conforms with all the terms and conditions of the solicitation and whose proposal is determined to represent the overall best value to the Government.

1.2. PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS

[*Am-8] Offeror shall email proposal to the following individuals prior to the proposal due date and time:

1. Bill Rawe whose email address is William.T.Rawe@usace.army.mil

2. Christine Wilson whose email address is Christine.L.Wilson@usace.army.mil

Electronic Proposals shall be received by the date and time indicated in Block 13 of the SF 1442 for this solicitation or as identified in subsequent amendments. The file size limitation is 20 MB per email message. An email with attachments totaling more than 20 MB may not be received by the Government.

All submissions shall be in Adobe PDF format with Optical Character Recognition (OCR) applied to all documents that will enable word searches to be conducted using Adobe-compatible PDF software. The three (3) volumes listed below shall be submitted as “SEPARATE” single files. Offerors may break down each volume if they exceed the maximum email file size. Offerors are encouraged to send all three (3) files in the same email transmission, if possible.

Volume I: Technical Volume II: Past Performance Volume III: Price and Pro Forma Information

Title the single files in the following format:

W9128F-21-R-0002_Company Name_Volume_I_Technical W9128F-21-R-0002_Company Name_Volume_II_Past_Performance W9128F-21-R-0002_Company Name_Volume_III_Price_and_Pro_Forma_Information (Note: Company name may be abbreviated)

It is imperative that none of the pricing or Volume 3 information show up in Volumes 1 or 2.

1.3 PROPOSAL FORMAT

Written materials: 8 ½” x 11” format using 10 point or larger font size. For each volume, provide a title sheet on the cover, table of contents and bookmarks matching the Table of Contents. Provide a title sheet identifying the prime, consortium, or joint venture’s name, address, telephone, and email address and point of contact. Include the signature, title and contact information of the official that can bind the firm. Note that the Government will not evaluate any material that exceeds the page limits, where indicated below.

2.0 BASIS OF AWARD

2.1. The Government will award one contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose proposal conforms to the solicitation and represents the best value to the Government, all factors considered. All evaluation factors other than cost or price, when combined are equal to cost or price (Factor 3). The intent of this solicitation is to obtain the best proposal within the cost limitation.

There is no obligation to approach or match the cost limitation in the offer. The Government reserves the right to accept other than the lowest priced offer or to reject all offers. The Government will not award a contract to an Offeror whose proposal contains a deficiency, as defined in FAR 15.001, and may not award a project that has a marginal rating in any factor.

Section 00 22 00 Page 4

3.0 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

3.1. Proposals should be submitted initially on the most favorable terms from a price and technical standpoint. Do not assume that offerors will be contacted or afforded an opportunity to clarify, discuss or revise their proposals.

3.2. The proposal shall describe the capability of the Offeror to perform the requirements of the RFP. The proposal should be specific and complete in every detail and should be prepared simply and economically, providing a straightforward and concise description of capabilities to satisfactorily perform the requirements. The proposal should be practical, legible, clear, and coherent.

3.3. In order to effectively and equitably evaluate all proposals, the Contracting Officer must receive information containing sufficient detail to allow review and evaluation by the Government. Proposal clarity, organization, and cross-referencing are mandatory. Failure to submit and organize proposals as requested may adversely affect an Offeror’s evaluation.

3.4. Firms formally organized as construction contractors that have associated specifically for this project, consortia of firms or any other interested parties may submit proposals. Associations may be as joint ventures or as key team subcontractors. Submit proposals as noted in paragraph 1.2 above. Note that the Government will not evaluate any material that exceeds the page limits, where indicated below.

Section 00 22 00 Page 5

PROPOSAL INFORMATION AND RELATED EVALUATION FACTORS AND SUBFACTORS

3.5. VOLUME 1 –TECHNICAL

Factor Location Description Relative Importance

FACTOR 1 TECHNICAL

Factor 1 is slightly more important than Factor

2. All evaluation factors other than cost or price, when combined are equal to cost or price (Factor 3).

Subfactor 1 Vol. 1 TAB A Specialized Experience Most important Subfactor.

Subfactor 2 Vol. 1 TAB B Project Management Plan 2nd most important Subfactor. Subfactor 2 is slightly less in importance to Subfactor 1.

Subfactor 3 Vol. 1 TAB C Key Personnel Capabilities and Experience

3rd most important Subfactor. Subfactor 3 is slightly less in importance to Subfactor 2.

Subfactor 4 Vol. 1 TAB D Small Business Participation 4th most important Subfactor. Subfactor 4 is slightly less in importance to Subfactor 3.

3.6. VOLUME 2 – PAST PERFORMANCE

Factor Location Description Relative Importance

FACTOR 2 Vol. 2 TAB A Past Performance

Factor 1 is slightly more important than Factor

2. All evaluation factors other than cost or price, when combined are equal to cost or price (Factor 3).

N/A Relevancy Used in determining rating for Factor 2

N/A Confidence Used in determining rating for Factor 2

3.7. VOLUME 3 – PRICE AND PRO FORMA INFORMATION

Factor Location Description Relative Importance

FACTOR 3 Vol. 3 TAB A Price (Standard Form 1442, Proposal Data Sheet And Contract Line Item Schedule)

Factor 1 is slightly more important than Factor

2. All evaluation factors other than cost or price, when combined are equal to cost or price (Factor 3).

N/A Vol. 3 TAB B Evidence of Bendability Not Rated

N/A Vol. 3 TAB C Required Pre-Award Information Not Rated

4.0 VOLUME 1 – TECHNICAL

4.1. VOLUME 1 -TAB A – SUBFACTOR 1 - SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE

4.1.1. Submission Requirements:

4.1.1.1. Construction Projects. The Offeror shall submit three (3) projects performed by the Prime Construction Entity. Limit one (1) page per project submitted, with one additional page allowed for describing past teaming experience between current team members, for a maximum of four (4) pages.

Any information presented beyond the page limit will not be evaluated.

4.1.1.2. Teaming Experience. The Offeror should describe any previous teaming experience between current team members, if not described in the project list. The above information is limited to projects that are

Section 00 22 00 Page 6 well underway (as defined in paragraph 4.1.1.3) or that have been completed and turned over no longer than the past ten (10) years preceding the issue date of this solicitation.

4.1.1.3. Project Information. All projects submitted should demonstrate experience on similar building and site improvement projects of similar or greater value and scope.

Similar Commercial or Military type buildings (relevant): Fitness Centers with Gymnasium, Large Warehouse and COF High Bays with Administrative space. Project information shall CLEARLY include:

- Summaries for each project submitted

- LEED certification level/status

- Contract award amount and final construction cost

- Location

- Date when the project was started (Month/Year)

- Original contract finish date and actual finish date (Month/Year)

- All summaries shall contain the name, address, telephone and email of a representative of the owner (as well as one alternate individual not affiliated with your firm) familiar with your firm’s experience on the project that can verify the experience cited.

- Please do not include extraneous information that was not requested.

The Offeror should demonstrate recent, relevant construction experience on similar building projects using, Construction – Specialized Experience Form (Attachment 3). Offerors may identify other federal government, state and local government and private contracts that are similar to the Government’s requirements set forth in the RFP. If the Offeror is a joint venture, each firm shall provide information, demonstrating experience relevant to their role on this project. Submit projects completed and turned over no longer than ten (10) years preceding the date of this Solicitation (recent). The government will also consider projects that are well underway (see paragraph 4.1.2.3). A project well underway is defined as the construction is greater than fifty percent complete as of the date of this Solicitation. If the Offeror has multiple functions or divisions, limit the project examples to those performed by the division or unit submitting the offer or by the team member. Offerors may list government, private or commercial customers. If projects were design-build, so identify them.

4.1.2. Evaluation Criteria: The Government will evaluate the construction experience on projects submitted as to how well they demonstrate the offeror’s role on this project, utilizing the following criteria. The criteria are not listed in any particular order of importance.

4.1.2.1. Experience on similar projects that meet or exceed the scope of this project may be rated more favorably.

4.1.2.2. Federal Government project experience may be rated more favorably than non-Federal Government project experience. Projects that demonstrate experience on similar military projects may be rated more favorably than experience on other Federal or non-Federal projects. Demonstrated experience with USACE Military construction contracts may be rated more favorably.

4.1.2.3. The more recent the project the more favorable the rating may be. Projects submitted that are well underway may be considered less relevant and rated less favorably. Joint Venture partners should each demonstrate experience commensurate with their role on this project or explain in the supplemental narrative how their experience qualifies them for their role on this project.

4.1.2.4. The Government may consider previous teaming experience among the team members as a strength.

The more relevant the experience, the more favorably it may be rated.

4.1.2.5. Note: The Government reserves the right to verify the experience record of cited projects or other recent projects by reviewing DoD or Government appraisal systems, or through interviewing owners or references. The Government may check any or all cited references to verify supplied information. A firm will not receive credit under this factor for the relevant experience of key personnel proposed for this project while employed at a different firm.

Section 00 22 00 Page 7

4.1.2.6. The Offeror should demonstrate qualifications and experience in sustainable design, based upon experience on projects that have achieved US Green Building Council’s LEED certification. A more favorable rating may be given if the offeror demonstrates qualifications and experience on LEED certification of Silver level or higher.

4.2. VOLUME 1 - TAB B – SUBFACTOR 2 – PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN

4.2.1. Submission Requirements:

4.2.1.1. Provide a narrative that describes the offeror’s Project Management approach to executing the contract pursuant to the following requirements. Clearly and concisely describe the organizational and technical approaches to project management and execution, proposed contract duration, and summary schedule.

Limit the narrative information to ten (10) pages or less.

[*Am-4]

4.2.1.2. Organization. List the construction entity (ies) and describe their resources and how their resources will be utilized, their roles and responsibilities and any contractual arrangements that have been established. Clearly describe any teaming or joint venture arrangements, including a clear description of each entity’s roles and responsibilities on the project. A copy of the teaming or joint venture agreement(s) shall be appended to the plan (not included in the page limitation). Identify the firm(s) chosen for the project, if not to be self-performed. The Offeror shall document unequivocal teaming arrangements with its lead entity (ies) and key subcontractors (see attachment 9). Describe the proposed management structure for the team, describing the how the construction process will be managed and the authorities and the delegations of authority within the team. Include a simple organizational chart, including the proposed quality control group(s). Include key personnel in the organization chart. Clearly illustrate key positions, names of the personnel, their firm affiliations, job locations and their job/position title within the organization. The organizational chart shall be consistent with the matrix of responsibilities assigned to the team entities, and with the list of key personnel to be provided under Volume 1, Tab B, Factor 2, “KEY PERSONNEL CAPABILITIES AND EXPERIENCE”.

4.2.1.3. Technical Approach for Construction. Describe the technical approach to construction of the facility.

Include any considerations of fast-tracking, panelization, pre-engineered components, etc. The Government is looking for ways to streamline construction and manage labor and other resources in an effort to reduce costs and achieve an aggressive schedule while minimizing impact to the installation.

The Government is looking for ways to minimize impacts of the construction.

4.2.1.4. Proposed Contract Duration: The offeror shall propose the contract duration in the appropriate Contract Line Item Number in the CLIN Schedule and should not exceed the benchmark performance duration specified in the CLIN. The offeror shall also list this duration in this tab of the proposal.

4.2.1.5. Summary Schedule: Submit a summary level schedule for construction. Provide schedules or diagrams separately in an appendix to the TAB (not included in the narrative page limitation) in a size that is easily read. Summary schedule shall be bound and clearly labeled as Tab B-Appendix. This summary schedule will, after contract award, be replaced with a project schedule as required by Section 01 32 01.00 10: Project Schedule. The schedules shall be task oriented, indicating the number of calendar days, after notice to proceed, by which milestones are to be achieved. Offeror may use a critical path or other method of his/her choice; however, schedules shall be graphically represented.

The proposed project schedule shall reflect the proposed contract duration. Give attention to the following features:

(a) Show the overall construction phase for the facilities, the site work and the utilities. Include any long lead items and any fast-tracking starts. It isn’t necessary to show the detailed breakdown construction (e.g., by trades) of each facility, site work and utilities.

(b) Show schedule line items for environmental permits and notifications and utility connection permits.

(c) Show turnover of facility. Identify any proposed phased turnovers. The time to complete the facility and turnover to the Government must consider the requirement for the Contractor’s CQC completion inspection and the subsequent joint Contractor-Government turnover inspection.

(d) Show as-built submissions (See section 01 78 39.00 24 AS-BUILT DRAWINGS).

Section 00 22 00 Page 8

(e) Constraints: Offeror must demonstrate the capability and flexibility to plan and schedule the complete project to meet the proposed contract completion period. Clearly identify any constraints on the schedules presented (e.g., labor or material availability, permits, weather). Indicate the anticipated overall critical path on the schedule.

4.2.2. Evaluation Criteria: The following criteria are not listed in any particular order of importance.

4.2.2.1. Organization. The Government will evaluate the clarity and strength of the overall organization and how well it is organized, structured and staffed to execute the entire scope of work. This factor will be rated as unacceptable if the Offeror has not selected a lead entity (ies). Joint venture participants’ contribution to the organization should be commensurate with their skills and background.

4.2.2.2. Technical Approach for Construction. Proposals that clearly and concisely demonstrate a thorough understanding of the constraints and impacts of the project construction may be rated more favorably.

The Government places a higher value on an offer that provides proposed methods to streamline construction and manage labor and other resource constraints, in an effort to reduce costs and support an aggressive schedule including such things as fast-tracking, etc. The Government will also consider whether the approach reduces on-site craft labor and susceptibility to inclement weather delays.

4.2.2.3. Proposed Contract Duration: The Government will evaluate the performance period, as proposed by the Offeror in the Contract Line Item Schedule. In assessing the reasonableness of the proposed contract duration, the Government may take into account how well the proposed summary schedule supports the proposed duration. Evaluators will use their independent judgment concerning logic, constraints and typical construction durations. The Government will rate the proposed duration matching the benchmark duration as “acceptable”. A proposed duration that is longer than the proposed benchmark duration will be viewed as less favorable than a duration that meets the benchmark. The Government will consider an unreasonably condensed contract duration as an additional cost or schedule risk on the Government or which may create a risk of contract or performance failure, depending upon the evaluators' judgment. Unless changed during negotiations, this duration will become the contractually binding performance period.

4.2.2.4. Summary Schedule: The Government will evaluate the summary schedule for integrated construction.

The length of the schedule must match the proposed performance duration. A Schedule unreasonably shorter than the proposed contract duration may indicate the Offeror is placing additional risk on the Government for any delays between the scheduled completion date and the required performance completion period, and may be rated less favorably. Offerors shall include field overhead costs in the contract price for the full proposed performance duration and these prices must be a reflection of the proposed schedule. The Government will evaluate the schedule to assess the strength of understanding of the project scope, restrictions which must be considered in the schedule e.g., permitting (see Section 01 32 01.00 10 Project Schedule), long lead items, availability of labor and materials, etc. A schedule that offers advantage(s) to the Government over one that merely indicates an adequate understanding of the scope, restrictions, major milestones and general understanding of the various events that can affect start and completion of construction will be rated more favorably.

4.3. VOLUME 1 - TAB C – SUBFACTOR 3 - KEY PERSONNEL CAPABILITIES AND EXPERIENCE

4.3.1. Submission Requirements:

For key personnel provide a brief resume using the Attachment 7 - Key Personnel Resume form at the end of this Section. Indicate the position title on each project listed in resumes. Provide the name, owner, dollar amount, date of completion, brief scope, and description of project responsibility for each.

Indicate whether project was performed with current employer or other. Include resumes for the following key personnel:

- Project Manager responsible for the overall project (Prime Construction Contractor Employee)

- Construction Quality Control System Manager (Prime Construction Contractor Employee)

- General Superintendent (Prime Construction Contractor Employee)

Section 00 22 00 Page 9

- Site Safety and Health Officer (SSHO) (Prime Construction Contractor Employee)

4.3.1.1. The minimum requirement for the Project Manager is 5 years of experience as a Project Manager, managing projects similar to this solicitation, with multiple subcontractors and familiarity with scheduling.

The Project Manager shall be a registered professional engineer (P.E.), a Registered Architect (R.A.) or have a Bachelor’s degree in Engineering, Architecture, Construction Engineering, or Construction Management.

4.3.1.2. The minimum experience requirement for the Contractor Quality Control (CQC) System Manager is 5 years of experience as a Quality Control Manager on similar projects to this solicitation. CQC System Manager shall comply with personnel requirements listed in Section 01 45 00.00 10 Quality Control.

4.3.1.3. The minimum experience requirement for the Superintendent is 5 years’ experience as superintendent, managing multiple trades and subcontractors.

4.3.1.4. Offeror shall provide unequivocal letters of commitment from all proposed key personnel NOT currently employed by the Offeror. Use the form letter Attachment 8 at the end of this section.

4.3.1.5. Each of the key personnel shall demonstrate experience on at least one project similar in scope and complexity to this solicitation, completed in the past ten (10) years, or well underway (as defined in Tab A).

4.3.2. Evaluation Criteria:

4.3.2.1. The Government will evaluate the required information to determine how well the offeror identifies and demonstrates that its key personnel meet or exceed minimum qualifications necessary, which includes previous satisfactory experience in similar type work, and to manage, control, and to perform construction. The following evaluation criteria will be utilized; criteria are not listed in any particular order of importance.

4.3.2.2. Resumes that do not clearly state the personnel’s specific duties and job title on previous projects may be rated less favorably.

4.3.2.3. Offerors that propose key personnel who worked on the projects submitted in Tab A may be rated more favorably.

4.3.2.4. Key personnel that demonstrate experience on multiple projects similar or greater in scope and complexity to this solicitation that exceed the required minimum experience may be rated more favorably.

4.3.2.5. Key personnel that demonstrate experience that exceeds the required minimum experience may be rated more favorably.

4.3.2.6. Previous Federal government project experience may be rated more favorably. Previous experience with USACE Construction contracts may be rated more favorably.

4.3.2.7. Performance of key personnel proposed for this project may be taken into account when it comes to the attention of the Government. This shall be achievable with other projected on-going work.

4.4. VOLUME 1 – TAB D – SUBFACTOR 4 – SMALL BUSINESS PARTICIPATION

4.4.1. Submission Requirements:

4.4.1.1. This factor requires all Offerors, regardless of size status to address their planned small business usage for this project. All Offerors are required to provide a Small Business Participation Plan (SBPP). It should address their corporate approach and methodology for acquiring, soliciting, and using small businesses in the performance of this contract. All documentation for this factor should address the

Section 00 22 00 Page 10

Offeror’s commitments to providing subcontracting opportunities, as well as evidence of planned and / or continued outreach efforts to encourage and us small businesses. This plan should include a breakdown of small business subcategories to be used as shown in (4.4.1.10.) and (4.4.1.11.) below.

4.4.1.2. Separate from the Small Business Participation Plan (Subfactor 4) required by all offerors, a Subcontracting Plan will ONLY be required from the Apparent Successful Offeror if the firm is an Other- Than-Small-Business (OTSB) - meeting the requirements of FAR 52.219-9 and DFARS 252.219-7003.

The Apparent Successful OTSB must submit an acceptable subcontracting plan to be eligible for award.

Subcontracting Plans shall reflect and be consistent with the commitments offered in the Small Business Participation Plan. Please do not submit a Subcontracting Plan for Subfactor 4.

4.4.1.3. The SBPP should demonstrate commitment to all federally designated categories of small business:

Small Businesses (SBs), Veteran-Owned Small Businesses (VOSBs), Service-Disabled Veteran- Owned Small Businesses (SDVOSBs) HUBZone Small Businesses (HUB), Small Disadvantaged Businesses (SDBs), Woman-Owned Small Business (WOSBs), and when applicable, Historically Black Colleges/Universities/Minority Institutions (HBCU/MIs).

4.4.1.4. Offerors should propose the level of participation of small businesses (as a small business prime, joint venture, teaming arrangement, and/or small business subcontractors) in the performance of the acquisition relative to the objectives/goals set forth in the evaluation of this area. The SBPP should identify all categories for participation as part of the Offeror's team. This should include a general description of the type of work, product or service anticipated to be supplied via a small business concern.

4.4.1.5. A specific format is not required, however, items stated below (4.4.1.6.) through (4.4.1.12.) shall be provided as a minimum.

4.4.1.6. Provide a Narrative addressing the corporate approach and methodology for acquiring, soliciting and using small businesses in the performance of this contract. The Narrative should address the Offeror's commitment to providing subcontracting opportunities, as well as evidence of planned and /or continued outreach efforts to encourage and use small businesses. The Narrative should provide detailed supporting documentation regarding the individual commitment expressed in percentages for evaluators to determine the goals stated are realistic.

4.4.1.7. Check the applicable size and categories for the PRIME Offeror for this procurement – Check all applicable boxes:

{___} Large Prime

- or -

{___} Small Business Prime; also categorized as a:

{___} Small Disadvantaged Business (SDB)

{___} Woman-Owned Small Business (WOSB)

{___} Historically Underutilized Zone (HUB Zone) Small Business

{___} Veteran Owned Small Business (VOSB)

{___} Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business (SDVOSB)

4.4.1.8. Submit the total percentages of work to be performed by both large and small businesses (include the percentage of work to be performed both by Prime, joint venture, teaming arrangement, and subcontractors). Percentages are based on Total Contract Value. For this project, the small business participation goal is 30% of the Total Contract Value performed by the Small Business Community.

Total Percentage planned for Large Business(es): = __________%

Section 00 22 00 Page 11

Total Percentage planned for Small Business(es): = __________%

(Small Business Prime Contractors – Include yourselves in the above percentage.)

For example: If you are a Small Business Prime Contractor and will be doing 40% of the work and you will be subcontracting another 30% of the Total Contract Value to other small business firms, then your Total Percentage planned for Small Business will equal 70%.

4.4.1.9. Indicate the total percentage of participation to be performed by each type of subcategory small business. The percentage of work performed by Small Businesses that qualify in multiple small business categories may be counted in each category:

4.4.1.10. For example: Firm A (WOSB and SDVOSB) performing 2%; and Firm B (SDB, HubZ and WOSB) performing 3%. Results equate to: SB 5%; SDB 3%; HubZone 3%; WOSB 5%; SDVOSB 2%; VOSB 2%;). SDVOSBs are also VOSBs automatically; however, VOSBs are not automatically SDVOSBs.

Small Business _________%

Small Disadvantaged Business _________%

HUB Zone Small Business _________%

Woman Owned Small Business _________%

Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned SB _________%

Veteran-Owned Small Business _________%

4.4.1.11. Identify the Prime Offeror and type of service/supply that the Prime Offeror will provide. Then list each of the intended subcontractors and principal supplies/services to be provided by that subcontractor.

Provide the Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) code for the Prime and each intended subcontractor. Also, provide the anticipated NAICS codes(s) that the Prime Offeror believes best describes the product or services being acquired by its subcontracts with each intended subcontractor.

Small business Primes and small business subcontractors that qualify as small businesses in multiple small business categories should be listed in each applicable small business category.

Firm Name CAGE Code NAICS code Type of Service Prime Offeror Large Business Small Business

SDB

WOSB

HUBZone

VOSB

SDVOSB

Note: Pursuant to Sections 8(d) of the Small Business Act, a business is considered small for Government procurements if it does not exceed the size standard for the NAICS code that the prime contractor believes best describes the product or services being acquired. In other words, the size of the prime’s suppliers is determined by the applicable NAICS code of their joint venture, teaming partner, or subcontract, which may or may not be the same NAICS code as the one for your prime contract with the Government.

4.4.1.12. Describe the extent of commitment to use small businesses (e.g., what types of commitments, if any, are in place for this specific acquisition either – small business prime, written contract, verbal, enforceable, non-enforceable, joint venturing, mentor-protégé, etc.) Provide documentation regarding commitments to small business for this effort. Copies of such agreements should be provided as part of your small business participation plan and will not count against the page limitation for this volume.

Section 00 22 00 Page 12

4.4.2. Evaluation Criteria:

4.4.2.1. The SBPP shall be consistent with the resultant Subcontracting Plan (if submitting a proposal as an Other-Than-Small-Business). The SBPP will be evaluated as follows:

Strengths may be given for each the following criteria:

4.4.2.2. Offerors that propose a Total Small Business Participation percentage of 30% or higher.

4.4.2.3. A proposal that indicates a realistic and thorough approach and understanding of the small business objectives in respect to this project.

4.4.2.4. A SBPP that provides clear detail of the services/supplies that small business firms are to perform.

4.4.2.5. Copies of agreements regarding commitments with all small business firms who are identified in the

SBPP.

4.4.2.6. Any other aspect of a proposal that the evaluators and/or the SSA believe enhances the merit of the proposal or increases the probability of successful performance of the contract.

4.4.2.7. Weaknesses may be given for each of the following criteria:

4.4.2.8. A proposed Total Small Business Participation percentage less than the stated goal of 30%.

4.4.2.9. Information submitted for items (4.4.1.6.) through (4.4.1.12.) above that is general or ambiguous language.

4.4.2.10. Omission or incompleteness of any requested information that is not otherwise a deficiency.

4.4.2.11. Any other aspect of a proposal that the Government identifies as a flaw that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance.

4.4.2.12. Deficiencies shall be given for each of the following criteria:

4.4.2.13. Omission of any item (4.4.1.6.) through (4.4.1.12.) above.

4.4.2.14. Any other material failure of a proposal to meet a Government requirement or a combination of significant weaknesses in a proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level.

5.0 VOLUME 2 – FACTOR 2 - PAST PERFORMANCE

5.1. VOLUME 2 – TAB A – PAST PERFORMANCE

5.1.1. Submission Requirements:

Submit past performance evaluations and ratings for each project the Offeror includes in its proposal for Factor 1 - Volume 1 - Tab A Specialized Experience.

If available, submit Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) Performance Evaluations ratings. For projects which were designed and/or constructed for other government entities, submit the performance appraisal sheets used by that government entity if available. For projects cited in Volume 1 - Tab A Specialized Experience not covered in the CPARS database or other Government Design Performance Rating System, submit a Past Performance Questionnaire (Attachment 6).

5.1.1.1. CPARS Evaluations

Section 00 22 00 Page 13

Firms are requested to retrieve their CPARS past performance information directly from CPARS available at: http://www.cpars.gov. CPARS is an electronic repository of performance information collected by all the major federal performance reporting systems. Logging onto CPARS will require the following:

All Department of Defense (DoD) employees (military and civilian), including DoD Contractors that are working on site (military/government facilities) or contractors working offsite using Government Furnished Equipment (GFE) are required to use certificates from DoD Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) to access CPARS. If the contractor doesn't work on site or with GFE they are encouraged to obtain and use a certificate from an External Certificate Authority (ECA). For DoD users, the use of PKI Login is Mandatory. Federal and Contractor users can use the PKI login category if they have PKI.

External Certificate Authority External Certificate Authorities (ECAs) and Interim External Certificate Authorities (IECAs) provide digital certificates to the DoD's private industry partners, contractors using their own equipment or working in non-government facilities, allied partners, and other agencies.

Additional information about the PKI certificate is at https://www.cpars.gov/pki_info.htm web page.

5.1.1.2. You will also need your DUNS number and Marketing Partner Identification Number (MPIN) to log onto CPARS. The MPIN number was selected by whoever registered your firm in the System for Award Management (SAM) Registry at https://www.sam.gov/portal/public/SAM/. If you do not know your MPIN number, you will need to contact the SAM help desk by emailing them from the email link on the https://www.sam.gov/portal/public/SAM/ web page. Please be aware that they will only release the MPIN number to the person who originally registered your firm. Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ)

The Past Performance Questionnaire (Attachment 6) is provided for the offeror or its team members to submit to the client. The Past Performance Questionnaire should be completed by an owner or owner’s representative not affiliated with your firm. Ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact.

Completed Past Performance Questionnaires should be submitted with your proposal. If the offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the offeror should complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ (Attachment 6), which will provide contract and client Information for the respective project(s). Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government's point of contact, via email at William.T.Rawe@usace.army.mil prior to proposal closing date. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation.

5.1.1.3. Government Utilization of Alternate Information Sources for Past Performance

The Government will assess the…