Am-0004_W9128F-20-R-0066.pdf

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

FACILITY CODE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required) copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15C. DATE SIGNED

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

PAGE OF PAGES

6. ISSUED BY CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)

CODE

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

Previous edition unusable

Amendment No. 0004 W9128F

LARGE VEHICLE INSPECTION POINT (LVIP), PN CRWU173001 (FY20), BUCKLEY AFB, COLORADO

See attached documentation for content of the amendment revisions to solicitation

Date for receipt of proposals is 21 AUG 2020 at 1400 hours

Government Point of Contact: Brian Finerty, Contract Specialist, Brian.C.Finerty@usace.army.mil

U.S.ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, OMAHA

Rocky Mountain Area Office Attn: CONTRACTING DIVISION (CENWO-CT-M) 5475 Tech Center Drive, Suite 205 Colorado Springs, CO 80919

See Item 6

W9128F-20-R-0066

08/14/2020

07/15/2020

08/14/2020

Am #0004 - 1

Am #0004 - 2 (Continuation SF 30)

14 August 2020 Solicitation No. W9128F 20 R 0066

Date of Issue: 15 JUL 2020 Date of Receiving Proposals: 21 AUG 2020

SUBJECT: Amendment No. 0004 to Request for Proposal Solicitation Package for Construction of LARGE VEHICLE INSPECTION POINT (LVIP).

TO: Prospective Offerors and Others Concerned

1. The specifications and drawings for subject project are hereby modified as follows (revise all specification indices, attachment lists, and drawing indices accordingly).

a. Specifications. (Descriptive Changes.) NONE

b. Specifications (New and/or Revised and Reissued). Delete and substitute or add specification pages or sections as noted below. The substituted pages or sections are revised and reissued with this amendment.

Pages or Sections Deleted Pages or Sections Substituted or Added 00 22 00 00 22 00

c. Drawings (Reissued). The following drawings are revised with latest revision date as shown in the drawing border, and reissued with this amendment.

VOLUME 1 OF 2 – SITE FACILITIES PACKAGE

1. SHEET CS101, SITE PLAN AREA 101

2. SHEET ES101, COMMUNICATIONS SITE PLAN

2. This amendment is a part of the proposing papers and its receipt shall be acknowledged. All other conditions and requirements of the request for proposal remain unchanged.

3. Electronic Proposals. Provide proposals via the instructions provided in Section 00 22 00 of the Request for Proposal.

4. Offers will be received until 2:00 p.m., local time at place of receiving proposals, 21 AUG 2020.

Attachments:

Specifications listed in 1.b., above Drawings listed in 1.c., above

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Omaha District 1616 Capitol Avenue Omaha, Nebraska 68102-4901

14 AUG 2020

nep/2160

Section 00 22 00- Page 1 Am #0004

SECTION 00 22 00

PROPOSAL INSTRUCTIONS,

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS AND EVALUATION

INDEX

1. WHO MAY SUBMIT

2. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

3. SUBMISSION DEADLINE

4. PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS

5. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

5.1 TECHNICAL (VOLUME 1)

5.2 PAST PERFORMANCE (VOLUME 2)

5.3 PRICING AND PRO FORMA INFORMATION (VOLUME 3)

6. EVALUATION FOR AWARD

7. TECHNICAL EVALUATION

8. CONTRACT AWARD

9. SELECTION AND AWARD WITHOUT EXCHANGES

10. SELECTION AND AWARD WITH EXCHANGES

11. PROPOSAL EXPENSES AND PRECONTRACT COSTS

12. DEBRIEFINGS

ATTACHMENT 1 – PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (FORM PPQ-0)

ATTACHMENT 2 - KEY PERSONNEL RESUME

Section 00 22 00- Page 2

SECTION 00 22 11

PROPOSAL INSTRUCTIONS,

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS AND EVALUATION

1. WHO MAY SUBMIT

This solicitation is restricted Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business Participation.

2. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

[*Am-4] In order to effectively and equitably evaluate the submitted proposal, the Contracting Officer must receive information sufficiently detailed to clearly indicate compliance with the proposal submission requirements.

The price proposal submitted in response to this request will be evaluated using one or more of the proposal analysis techniques identified in FAR 15.404-1(b). Contract award will be made to the proposal found to be the lowest aggregated proposed price in accordance with FAR 52.217-5 Evaluation of Options. All proposers, including joint ventures, must be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) and have completed their Representations and Certifications through SAM.

3. SUBMISSION DEADLINE

Proposals shall be received by the USACE Contracting Activity no later than the time and date specified in Block 13 of Standard Form 1442. Proposals shall be submitted electronically to the Contract Specialist per the instructions below. The Contract Specialist is Brian Finerty, Brian.C.Finerty@usace.army.mil.

4. PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS

Offers shall be submitted by the time and date as specified in Section 00 10 00, Page 1. Coordinate directly with Contract Specialist with any questions related thereto prior to the time and date specified in the solicitation. The proposal shall be emailed to the following. If the proposal is too large for email, Offers may be submitted electronically via DOD Safe Access File Exchange (SAFE) at https://safe.apps.mil/ to the following recipients:

Brian Finerty, Brian.C.Finerty@usace.army.mil Christine Wilson, Christine.L.Wilson@usace.army.mil

**Offerors accessing the DOD SAFE site as a GUEST (a “Guest” is defined as a user who is not assigned a CAC) must request a package invitation from the Contract Specialist listed in Section 00 10 00, Page 1 a minimum of 48-business hours prior to the close of the RFP.**

For the purposes of determining whether the proposal was received "late" in accordance with FAR 15.208, the date and time the file(s) are received by the USACE Outlook Server or uploaded into the DOD SAFE website as identified in the DOD SAFE notification e-mail sent to the Contract Specialist(s)/ Contracting Officer will be the time and date the Government received the proposal. Do not assume that electronic communication is instantaneous. Please make allowances for delays in transmittal.

Volume 1: Technical Volume 2: Past Performance Volume 3: Price and Pro Forma Information

Title the single files in the following format:

W9128F-20-R-0066_Company Name_Volume_1_Technical W9128F-20-R-0066_Company Name_Volume_2_Past_Performance W9128F-20-R-0066_Company Name_Volume_3_Price_and_Pro_Forma_Information

5. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

Section 00 22 00- Page 3

8.5”x 11” page size; font no smaller than 10 size. The requirements specified in the solicitation are considered minimum requirements. A proposal that fails to comply with the minimum technical requirements will not be eligible for award.

VOLUME 1 –TECHNICAL

Factor Location Description Relative Importance

FACTOR 1 Vol. 1 TAB A Offeror’s Construction Experience Acceptable/Unacceptable

FACTOR 2 Vol. 1 TAB B Minimum Dollar Amount of Construction Projects Acceptable/Unacceptable

FACTOR 3 Vol. 1 TAB C Construction Personnel Acceptable/Unacceptable

VOLUME 2 – PAST PERFORMANCE

Factor Location Description Relative Importance

FACTOR 5 Vol. 2 TAB A Offeror’s Past Construction Performance Acceptable/Unacceptable

VOLUME 3 – PRICE AND PRO FORMA INFORMATION

Factor Location Description Relative Importance

FACTOR 6 Vol. 3 TAB A Price (Standard Form 1442, Proposal Data Sheet And Contract Line Item Schedule)

LPTA

N/A Vol. 3 TAB B Evidence of Bondability Not Rated

N/A Vol. 3 TAB C Required Pre-Award Information Not Rated

IT IS IMPERATIVE THAT NONE OF THE PRICING OR VOLUME 3 INFORMATION SHOW UP IN

VOLUME 1.

5.1 TECHNICAL (VOLUME 1)

5.1.1 FACTOR 1: Offeror’s Construction Experience

5.1.1.1 Submission Requirements

[*Am-2] Offeror shall submit two (2) construction projects completed of similar size and scope as this project within the last six (6) years demonstrating past experience as the prime contractor, one (1) of those projects shall be constructed for the Federal Government. No more than two (2) projects are to be submitted. Project information shall consist of vertical facility construction (e.g., containing architectural, structural, mechanical, fire protection and electrical construction features). Project example information shall include: Summaries for each project submitted; picture/photo of the each project example if available; a description of the project; construction contract award amount; final construction cost;

location; date when the project was started; original contract finish date and actual finish date. All summaries shall contain the name, address, telephone and email address of a representative of the owner (as well as one alternate individual not affiliated with your firm) familiar with your firm’s experience on the project that can verify the experience cited.

Section 00 22 00- Page 4

NOTE: "offeror" and "prime contractor" as used in the paragraph directly above (as well as the rest of this solicitation) shall both be taken to mean ONLY the named entity entered on SF1442 of Section 00 10 00 of the proposal submission. In the event the offeror is a Joint Venture, projects submitted for this evaluation factor shall be those completed by the Joint Venture offeror or any party to the Joint Venture.

In the event the prime contractor intends to have contractor team arrangement(s) whereby a potential prime contractor agrees with one or more other companies to have them act as its subcontractor(s) under this Government contract, projects submitted for this evaluation factor shall be limited to projects completed by the offeror/prime contractor entity ONLY. The Government will not accept for evaluation projects completed by a potential prime contractor's prospective subcontractor(s).

5.1.1.2 Evaluation Criteria

Acceptable: The proposal adheres to the requirements above and demonstrates that the offeror has the required construction experience.

Unacceptable: The proposal does not demonstrate that the construction experience cited meets the minimum requirements stated above. Any Factor receiving an “Unacceptable” will render the entire proposal as “Unacceptable”.

5.1.2 FACTOR 2: Minimum Dollar Amount of Construction Projects

5.1.2.1 Submission Requirements

Construction projects cited in paragraph 5.1.1.1 above shall have a minimum construction dollar value of $2,000,000 and have completed construction within the last six (6) years from date proposals are due.

Indefinite-Delivery, Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Contracts, where numerous Task Orders are summed to meet the minimum construction dollar value identified herein, are not acceptable.

5.1.2.2 Evaluation Criteria

Acceptable: The proposal demonstrates that the construction projects cited meet the minimum construction dollar value stated above.

Unacceptable: The proposal does not demonstrate that the construction projects cited meet the minimum construction dollar value stated above. Any Factor receiving an “Unacceptable” will render the entire proposal as “Unacceptable”.

5.1.3 FACTOR 3: Construction Personnel

5.1.3.1 Submission Requirements

For key personnel provide a brief resume to include all items below using the Attachment 2 - Key Personnel Resume form at the end of this Section. Required personnel are:

Project Manager Construction Superintendent Construction Quality Control Manager

Each of the required personnel above shall have completed at least one Federal Government project in the role they are identified for within the last three (3) years. Resumes for each member shall have dates (beginning and ending of project by month/year). Each project cited shall have a minimum construction cost of $2,000,000. Resume information shall be listed in reverse chronological order with the latest construction experience listed first and work back until the Federal Government construction experience is identified within the 3 year period from the date proposals are due. If the successful Offeror needs to replace a named individual, replacement personnel having education and experience meeting or exceeding those identified in the proposal and shall be presented for acceptance and approval by the Contracting Officer.

Section 00 22 00- Page 5

The minimum experience requirement for the Contractor Quality Control (CQC) System Manager is 5 years of experience as a Quality Control Manager on similar projects to this solicitation. CQC System Manager shall comply with personnel requirements listed in Section 01 45 00.00 10 Quality Control.

5.1.3.2 Evaluation Criteria

Acceptable: The proposal demonstrates that the construction personnel cited meet the minimum experience requirements stated above.

Unacceptable: The proposal does not demonstrate that the construction personnel cited meet the minimum experience requirements stated above. Any Factor receiving an “Unacceptable” will render the entire proposal as “Unacceptable”.

5.2 PAST PERFORMANCE (VOLUME 2)

5.2.1 FACTOR 4: Offeror’s Past Construction Performance -

5.2.1.1 Submission Requirements

Submit past construction performance evaluations on the two (2) projects submitted under Paragraph 6.1, above. The Government reserves the right to contact the evaluator of those projects to verify the firm’s construction performance and performance rating. Federal Government projects presented in Paragraph

5.1.1 should be in the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) database. For projects cited in Volume 1, Factor 1: Offeror’s Construction Experience that are not covered in the CPARS database or other Government Design Performance Rating System, submit a Past Performance Questionnaire (attached to this section).

Firms are requested to retrieve their CPARS past performance information directly from CPARS available at: http://www.cpars.gov. CPARS is an electronic repository of performance information collected by all the major federal performance reporting systems. Logging onto CPARS will require the following:

All Department of Defense (DoD) employees (military and civilian), including DoD Contractors that are working on site (military/government facilities) or contractors working offsite using Government Furnished Equipment (GFE) are required to use certificates from DoD Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) to access CPARS. If the contractor doesn't work on site or with GFE they are encouraged to obtain and use a certificate from an External Certificate Authority (ECA). For DoD users, the use of PKI Login is Mandatory.

Federal and Contractor users can use the PKI login category if they have PKI.

5.2.1.1.1 External Certificate Authority

External Certificate Authorities (ECAs) and Interim External Certificate Authorities (IECAs) provide digital certificates to the DoD's private industry partners, contractors using their own equipment or working in non-government facilities, allied partners, and other agencies.

Additional information about the PKI certificate is at https://www.cpars.gov/pki_info.htm web page.

You will also need your DUNS number and Marketing Partner Identification Number (MPIN) to log onto CPARS. The MPIN number was selected by whoever registered your firm in the System for Award Management (SAM) Registry at https://www.sam.gov/portal/public/SAM/. If you do not know your MPIN number, you will need to contact the SAM help desk by emailing them from the email link on the https://www.sam.gov/portal/public/SAM/ web page. Please be aware that they will only release the MPIN number to the person who originally registered your firm.

5.2.1.1.2 Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ)

Section 00 22 00- Page 6

The Past Performance Questionnaire (Attachment 1) is provided for the offeror or its team members to submit to the client. The Past Performance Questionnaire should be completed by an owner or owner’s representative not affiliated with your firm. Ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact.

Completed Past Performance Questionnaires should be submitted with your proposal. If the offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the offeror should complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ (Attachment 1), which will provide contract and client Information for the respective project(s). Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government's point of contact, via email at Brian.C.Finerty@usace.army.mil prior to proposal closing date. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation.

5.2.1.2 Evaluation of Construction Past Performance

There are two aspects to the construction past performance evaluation. The first is to evaluate whether the offeror’s present/past performance is relevant or not relevant to the effort to be acquired. The criteria to establish what is recent and relevant are unique to this LPTA source selection. Therefore, the solicitation establishes the criteria for recency and relevancy in relation to the specific requirement being procured. In establishing what is relevant for the acquisition, consideration was given to what aspects of an offeror’s contract history would give the most confidence that the offeror will satisfy the current procurement. The second aspect of the past performance evaluation is to determine how well the contractor performed on the contracts. The past performance evaluation performed in support of a current source selection does not establish, create, or change the existing record and history of the offeror’s past performance on past contracts; rather, the past performance evaluation process gathers information from customers on how well the offeror performed those past contracts.

Acceptable: The proposal demonstrates that a final project performance rating of “Satisfactory” or above for work performed on each of the two (2) construction projects cited in Paragraph 5.1.1 was received by the construction entity.

Unacceptable: The proposal does not demonstrate a final project performance rating of “Satisfactory” or above for work performed on each of the two (2) construction projects cited in Paragraph 5.1.1 was received by the construction entity. Any personnel receiving an “Unacceptable” will render the entire proposal as “Unacceptable”.

5.3 PRICING AND PRO FORMA INFORMATION (VOLUME 3)

5.3.1 Submission Requirements

Submit the Pricing and Pro Forma information as a separate file in accordance with Paragraph 4. Submit the following:

a) Section 00 10 00, Solicitation/Contract Form and Pricing Schedule: The total combined cost for the construction will be considered for award.

b) Section 00 45 00, Representations and Certifications: This item will not be considered for evaluation purposes, but is required to be completed and submitted with your offer.

c) Pre-Award Survey Information (Local Provision) (Sep 93): The following information shall be submitted with the offer. This facilitates the award process.

i. Financial:

1. Name, address, and telephone number of the Financial Institution utilized by the

Offeror.

Section 00 22 00- Page 7

2. Name, telephone number, and email address for the points of contact, primary and alternate, to be contacted for information.

ii. Bonding Information:

1. Name, address, telephone number of the Surety Company utilized by the Offeror.

2. Name, telephone number, and email address for the points of contact, primary and alternate, to be contacted for information.

6. EVALUATION FOR AWARD

Evaluation for Award will be according to the Lowest-Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) source selection process. Uniformity of all proposals is essential to assure accurate evaluation. All proposals must comply with the instructions in the solicitation. Those proposals, which are properly submitted, will be evaluated to determine technically acceptable contractor(s). A proposal that fails to comply with any minimum technical requirements will not be eligible for award regardless that it may offer the lowest price.

7. TECHNICAL EVALUATION

Proposals will be evaluated by a Source Selection Evaluation Board (SSEB). Pricing data will not be part of the technical evaluation. Criteria for the technical evaluation as set forth in the solicitation will be the sole basis for determining the technical merit of proposals. Factors listed below will be assigned a technical evaluation of “Acceptable” or “Unacceptable”. Any Factor receiving an “Unacceptable” will render the entire proposal as “Unacceptable” regardless of the price. No further evaluation will be made on the Offeror’s proposal, including price.

Volume 1, Technical FACTOR 1: Offeror’s Construction Experience FACTOR 2: Minimum Dollar Amount of Construction Projects FACTOR 3: Construction Personnel

Volume 2, Past Performance FACTOR 4: Offeror’s Past Construction Performance

The following ratings and descriptions apply for Volume 1 evaluation criteria:

Technical Acceptable/Unacceptable Ratings for Volume 1

Rating Description

Acceptable Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation

Unacceptable Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation

The following ratings and descriptions apply for Volume 2 evaluation criteria:

Past Performance Evaluation Ratings for Volume 2

Rating Description

Section 00 22 00- Page 8

Acceptable

Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown. (See note below.)

Unacceptable

Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Note: In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonable assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305 (a)(2)(iv)). Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, “unknown” shall be considered “acceptable.”

8. CONTRACT AWARD

Subject to provisions contained herein, award will be made to one Offeror. The Government will select for award the responsible Offeror providing a technically acceptable proposal with the lowest price. To be considered for award, proposals shall conform to the terms and conditions contained in the solicitation.

No proposal shall be accepted that does not comply with all technical requirements specified in this solicitation or which includes stipulations or qualifying conditions.

9. SELECTION AND AWARD WITHOUT EXCHANGES

It is the intent of the Government to evaluate proposals and make award based upon initial offers received, without further exchanges (clarifications, communications, discussions; reference FAR 15.306 concerning exchanges with offerors after receipt of proposals) or additional information. Therefore, proposals should be submitted initially on the most favorable terms of price and technical requirements.

Do not assume an opportunity will be afforded to clarify, discuss, or revise proposals. If award is not made on initial offers, exchanges will be conducted as needed.

10. SELECTION AND AWARD WITH EXCHANGES

If exchanges are conducted, the Source Selection Evaluation Board (SSEB) will evaluate supplemental information provided by the Offeror and may adjust a proposal’s acceptability as required. The SSEB will provide a list of the technically acceptable offers to the Source Selection Authority.

11. PROPOSAL EXPENSES AND PRECONTRACT COSTS

This solicitation does not commit the Government to pay costs incurred in preparation and submission of proposals or for any other costs incurred prior to execution of a formal contract.

12. DEBRIEFINGS

Debriefings will be conducted in accordance with FAR 15.505 and 15.506. In accordance with Class Deviation 2018-O0011 and FAR 15.506(d), the Contracting Officer will provide unsuccessful Offerors an opportunity to submit additional questions related to the postaward debriefing within two business days

Section 00 22 00- Page 2 after the debriefing. The agency will respond in writing within five business days after receipt of the questions and comply with the requirements of FAR 33.104(c).

PPQ-0 (9/30/11)

ATTACHMENT 1 – PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (FORM PPQ-0)

NAVFAC/USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ-0) CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)

1. Contractor Information Firm Name: CAGE Code:

Address: DUNs Number:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:

2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain) Percent of project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):

3. Contract Information Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please specify):

Contract Title:

Contract Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Explain Differences:

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):

Explain Differences:

4. Project Description:

Complexity of Work High Med Routine How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)

CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)

5. Client Information Name:

Title:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

6. Describe the client’s role in the project:

7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):

8. Client’s Signature:

NOTE: NAVFAC/USACE REQUESTS THAT THE CLIENT COMPLETES THIS QUESTIONNAIRE AND SUBMITS DIRECTLY BACK TO THE OFFEROR. THE OFFEROR WILL SUBMIT THE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO USACE WITH THEIR PROPOSAL, AND MAY DUPLICATE THIS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FUTURE SUBMISSION ON USACE SOLICITATIONS. CLIENTS ARE HIGHLY ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT QUESTIONNAIRES DIRECTLY TO THE OFFEROR. HOWEVER, QUESTIONNAIRES MAY BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO USACE. PLEASE CONTACT THE OFFEROR FOR USACE POC INFORMATION. THE GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO VERIFY ANY AND ALL

INFORMATION ON THIS FORM.

ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE

RATING DEFINITION NOTE

(E) Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.

An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

(VG) Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.

(S) Satisfactory Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract.

There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.

(M) Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.

(U) Unsatisfactory

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.

(N) Not Applicable

No information or did not apply to your contract Rating will be neither positive nor negative.

TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT

PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.

1. QUALITY:

a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts E VG S M U N

b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance E VG S M U N

c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance

E VG S M U

N

d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance)

E VG S M U

N

2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below)

E VG S M U

N

b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract

E VG S M U

N

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project? E VG S M U N

b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes;

responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication)

E VG S M U

N

c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer?

E VG S M U

N

d) Overall customer satisfaction E VG S M U N

4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR

a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force? E VG S M U N

b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort E VG S M U N

c) Government Property Control E VG S M U N

d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel E VG S M U N

e) Utilization of Small Business concerns E VG S M U N

f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines E VG S M U N

g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes E VG S M U N

h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program) E VG S M U N

5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)? E VG S M U N

b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client

E VG S M U N

c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns)

E VG S M U N

d) Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section. Yes No

e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.

Yes No

f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below. Yes No

6. SAFETY/SECURITY

a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues?

(Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.)

E VG S M U N

b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements. E VG S M U N

7. GENERAL

a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues).

E VG S M U N

b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues) E VG S M U N

c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below) Yes No

d) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor. E VG S M U N

Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks.

Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary):

ATTACHMENT 2 - KEY PERSONNEL RESUME

Provide information, listed below, on separate sheets showing qualifications of: prime contractor’s project manager responsible for construction. For construction, include the quality control manager (in charge of self-performed work).

Use a continuation sheet, if needed. NOTE: Match the positions on this page to the list of key personnel in the narrative submission requirements and evaluation criteria.

(a) Your Name and Title______________________________________________________________________

(a) Your Assignment on this Project_____________________________________________________________

(b) Name of Your Firm_______________________________________________________________________

(c) No. of Years: With this Firm__________ With other Firms____________

(d) Education: Degree(s)/Year/Specialization_____________________________________________________

(e) _______________________________________________________________________________________

(f) Active Registration, if any: No._______, State(s) ______, First Year/ Current Year ______/______

Describe Your Specific Experience and Qualifications Relevant to this Project:

End of Section 00 22 00

(BLDG 517)(BLDG 518)

INVERT = 5530.661

24 IN RCP

INVERT = 5532.002

24 IN RCP

(BUILDING 517)

INVERT = 5533.554

30 IN RCP

INVERT = 5533.988

30 IN RCP

CP

CP

CP

MW

MW

MW

MW

MW

MW

GOV PARKING

(TO REMAIN AND BE PROTECTED)

EXISTING MONITORING WELLS

11 TRUCK CAPACITY)

TRUCK HOLDING (APPROX.

33.66'

38.32'

80.5'

AND DRIVE

OVERWATCH PAD

16'

DROP ARM

CRASH RATED

.3

(TO REMAIN AND BE PROTECTED)

EXISTING MONITORING WELLS

GRASS SWALE

GRASS SHOULDER

GRASS SHOULDER

GRASS SWALE

GRASS SWALE

6' CONCRETE SIDEWALK (TYP)

TEMP GENERATOR PAD

GOV PARKING/

FENCE

EXISTING K-RATED

STRUCTURAL STOOPS

STRUCTURAL STOOP

STRUCTURAL STOOPS

EQUIPMENT

GRAVEL FOR MECH.

TIE INTO EXISTING ROAD

STRUCTURAL STOOP

END OF CONCRETE CURB

CONCRETE CURB

END OF CONCRETE CURB

SEE NOTES

BEHIND EXISTING K-RATED FENCE

BARRIER WILL BE ANCHORED

DOD APPROVED PASSIVE VEHICLE

FROM ROADWAY

VEHICLE BARRIER PLACED 7'

DOD APPROVED PASSIVE

3' FROM ROADWAY

VEHICLE BARRIER PLACED

DOD APPROVED PASSIVE

3' FROM ROADWAY

VEHICLE BARRIER PLACED

DOD APPROVED PASSIVE

BOLLARDS, TYP. SEE NOTES

9" DIAMETER FIXED PIPE

BOLLARDS, TYP. SEE NOTES

9" DIAMETER FIXED PIPE

SHEET SC501 AND CS 502

INSTALL FE6 CHAIN-LINK FENCE SEE

IF EXISTING GATE IS DAMAGED,

SHEET SC501 AND CS 502

INSTALL FE6 CHAIN-LINK FENCE SEE

IF EXISTING GATE IS DAMAGED,

'10

.5

' 7.5' DRIVE RADIUS

S O

L

IC

IT

A T

IO

N N

O

D E

S

IG

N E

D B

Y

D E

S C

R

IP

T

IO

N

M A

R K

S

IZ

E

S U

B M

IT

T E

D B

Y

D A

T E

C O

N T

R A

C T N

O

C H

E C

K E

D B

Y

D R

A W

N B

Y

IS

S

U E D

A T

E

SHEET ID

G

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

F

E

D

C

B

A

®of Engineers

US Army Corps

U .S

A R

M Y C

O R

P S O

F E

N G

IN

E E

R S

101102

102103

104105

PLACE LIGHTED SIGNAGE

N

KEYPLAN SCALE: 1" = 700'

30' 60'0

SCALE: 1" = 30'-0"

N

GATEHOUSE

BYPASS LANE

6+00

7+00

8+00

N 1,689,976.64

E 3,207,082.94

N 1,689,929.65

E 3,207,086.14

N 1,689,924.35

E 3,207,139.36

N 1,689,747.29

E 3,207,588.51

N 1,689,709.18

E 3,207,572.51

N 1,689,981.57

E 3,207,676.36

N 1,689,981.13

E 3,207,638.04

N 1,689,832.18

E 3,207,527.18

N 1,689,532.86

E 3,207,491.05

N 1,689,532.86

E 3,207,588.51

N 1,689,809.18

E 3,207,348.08

N 1,689,832.18

E 3,207,369.64

N 1,689,976.33

E 3,207,046.15

INSPECTION BAY

COMMERCIAL

E 3,207,361.84

N 1,689,832.18

N 1,689,874.38

E 3,207,361.84

N 1,689,595.07

E 3,207,570.51

N 1,689,892.51

E 3,207,389.55

N 1,689,892.51

E 3,207,407.55

N 1,689,832.18

E 3,207,532.18

N 1,689,877.43

E 3,207,532.18

N 1,689,890.54

E 3,207,506.01

N 1,689,893.26

E 3,207,520.12

N 1,689,902.99

E 3,207,535.27

N 1,689,819.76

E 3,207,607.86

N 1,689,806.75

E 3,207,607.71N 1,689,774.67

E 3,207,548.08

N 1,689,764.31

E 3,207,555.94

N 1,689,570.42

E 3,207,544.41

O M

A H

A

N E

F

IL

E N

A M

E

O M

A H

A

N E

F

IL

E N

A M

E

C

A P

IT

O L A

V E

F

IL

E N

U M

B E

R

C

A P

IT

O L A

V E

F

IL

E N

U M

B E

R

B U

C S .d g n

B U

C S .d g n

O M

A H

A D

IS

T R

IC

T O

M A

H A D

IS

T R

IC

T

B U

C K

L E

Y A

F B

C O

L O

R A

D O

L A

R G

E V

E H

IC

L E I

N S

P E

C T

IO

N P

O

IN

T

L V

IP

P N C

R W

U F

Y

S

IT

E P

L A

N S

IT

E P

L A

N

A R

E A

A R

E A

C

IV

IL

S

E C

T

IO

N

CS101

C

IV

IL

S

E C

T

IO

N

CS101

A N

S I

D A

N S I

D

A F -1

-0

A

F -1

-0

/0

/2

/0

/2

W F -2

-R -0

W F -2

-R -0

D F

E C

H N

E R

W

C

D A

V E

N P

O R

T W

C

D A

V E

N P

O R

T

D F

E C

H N

E R

D F

E C

H N

E R

DETAILS.

ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS FOR PLACEMENT AND STRUCTURAL SHEETS FOR

2. 9" DIAMETER FIXED PIPE BOLLARDS AT EACH OVERHEAD DOOR. SEE

FOR AS-BUILT FENCE (CS901 - CS904).

TWO PASSIVE BARRIERS SHALL NOT EXCEED 4'. SEE ATTACHED PLANS

POSSIBLE TO EXISTING K-RATED FENCE. LINEAR DISTANCE BETWEEN THE

1. DOD APPROVED PASSIVE BARRIER TO BE ANCHORED AS CLOSE AS

NOTES:

3 4

/0

/2

/1

/2

A M G

E N

E R

A L R

E V

IS

IO

N S

A M G

E N

E R

A L R

E V

IS

IO

N S

TEHH 3-3

EV

INVERT = 5530.661

24 IN RCP

INVERT = 5532.002

24 IN RCP

(BUILDING 518)

(BUILDING 517)

INVERT = 5533.554

30 IN RCP

INVERT = 5533.988

30 IN RCP

V

CP

CP

CP

E

E

E

CP

MW

MW

MW

MW

MW

MW

MW

CP

V

TEHH-2-2

EXISTING HANDHOLE

TEHH-3-3

EXISTING HANDHOLE

TEHH-3-4

EXISTING HANDHOLE

TEHH-2-4

EXISTING HANDHOLE

TEMH-6-9

EXISTING MANHOLE

TEMH-6-1

EXISTING MANHOLE

TEMH-6-2

EXISTING MANHOLE

TEMH-6-11

EXISTING MANHOLE

SEE ES101

NEW HANDHOLE

SEE ES101

BUILDING SERVICE ENTRANCE

NEW HANDHOLE FOR LVIP

TEHH-2-5

EXISTING HANDHOLE

TEHH-6-1

EXISTING HANDHOLE

TEHH-6-2

EXISTING HANDHOLE

TEMH-6-16

EXISTING MANHOLE

TEMH-6-8

EXISTING MANHOLE

TEHH-6-4

EXISTING HANDHOLE

TEHH-2-3

EXISTING HANDHOLE

NEW EQUIPMENT.

TERMINATE ON

ENTER BUILDING 730.

S O

L

IC

IT

A T

IO

N N

O

D E

S

IG

N E

D B

Y

D E

S C

R

IP

T

IO

N

M A

R K

S

IZ

E

S U

B M

IT

T E

D B

Y

D A

T E

C O

N T

R A

C T N

O

C H

E C

K E

D B

Y

D R

A W

N B

Y

IS

S

U E D

A T

E

SHEET ID

G

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

F

E

D

C

B

A

HH-5P

POWER

HH-3C

COMM.

CAM 10

HH-4P

POWER

A2

CAM 9

A2

A2

A1

A2

A1

A1

A1

A2

A2

VAULT

ELECTRICAL

EXISTING

HH

COMM.

T

HH

COMM.

HH-1P

POWER

HH-3P

POWER

HH-2C

COMM.

HH-1C

COMM.

BUPS- 9, 11

T44

T44

T33

T33T33

T33 T33

T33 T33

A2

SEE SHEET ES509.

CONNECTION LOCATION.

TEMPORARY GENERATOR

A1

A2E

A1E

A2E

2 ON ES504.

2P. SEE DETAIL

ON ES504.

DETAIL 2

2P. SEE

ON ES504.

DETAIL 1

2C. SEE

ON ES504.

DETAIL 1

2C. SEE

ELBOWS

VAULT WITH LOAD BREAK

SHALL TERMINATE IN ELECTRICAL

MEDIUM VOLTAGE CONDUCTORS

4" C, PVC

2" C, PVC

1" C, PVC

4" C, PVC

4" C, PVC

4" C, PVC

PVC

(2) 4" C, 10' - 0"

10' - 0"

10' - 0"

10' - 0"

10' - 0"

10' - 0"

10' - 0"

10' - 0"

10' - 0"

10' - 0"

10' - 0"

10' - 0"

2" C, PVC

2" C, PVC

1" C, PVC

N:1689639.0451

E:3207008.8302

NEAR B517.

MAINTENANCE HOLE

COMMUNICATIONS

EXISTING

ON ES504.

DETAIL 1

2C. SEE

2" C, PVC

LG - 6, 8

LG - 2, 4

10' - 0"

1" C, PVC

(2) 4" C, PVC

2" C, PVC

LIGHT

WIG-WAG

BARRIER

2" C, PVC

1" C, PVC LIGHTS

SIGNAL

BARRIER

LIGHT POLE

MOUNT TO

SIGNAL LIGHTS

BARRIER

LIGHT POLE

MOUNT TO

SIGNAL LIGHTS

BARRIER

LIGHTS

SIGNAL

BARRIER

1" C, PVC

CABINET

CONTROL

BARRIER

PAD FOR

OVERWATCH

ON ES504.

DETAIL 1

2C. SEE

LIGHT

WIG-WAG

BARRIER

1" C, PVC

1" C, PVC

1" C, PVC

LIGHT POLE

MOUNTEDTO

WIG-WAG LIGHT

BARRIER

®of Engineers

US Army Corps

U .S

A R

M Y C

O R

P S O

F E

N G

IN

E E

R S

O M

A H

A

N E

F

IL

E N

A M

E

O M

A H

A

N E

F

IL

E N

A M

E

C

A P

IT

O L A

V E

F

IL

E N

U M

B E

R

C

A P

IT

O L A

V E

F

IL

E N

U M

B E

R

B U

E

S .d g n

B U

E

S .d g n

O M

A H

A D

IS

T R

IC

T O

M A

H A D

IS

T R

IC

T

U

C K

L E

Y A

F B

C O

L O

R A

D O

L A

R G

E V

E H

IC

L E I

N S

P E

C T

IO

N P

O

IN

T

L V

IP

P N C

R W

U F

Y

N

SCALE: 1" = 200'-0"

200' 400'0

/0

/2

/0

/2

ES100ES100

A F -1

-0

A

F -1

-0

W F -2

-R -0

W F -2

-R -0

C O

M M

U N

IC

A T

IO

N S S

IT

E P

L A

N C

O M

M U

N

IC

A T

IO

N S S

IT

E P

L A

N S L

IN

D G

R E

N S L

IN

D G

R E

N

J

M O

E N

C H

J

M O

E N

C H

J

M O

E N

C H

A

M G

E N

E R

A L R

E V

IS

IO

N S

-1

-2

ONCE THE CABLE IS IN PLACE AT BUILDING 730.

DUCT WILL BE FIRE-STOPPED FOR SAFETY PURPOSES 6.

"PATCH PANEL D".

PATCH PANEL. NEW PATCH PANEL WILL BE LABELED AS

THE THIRD PATCH PANEL, LABELED IN TOP LEFT CORNER OF

PATCH PANEL IS TO BE PLACED INTO RELAY RACK 02 BELOW

OPTIC CABLE INSIDE OF BUILDING 730 ROOM 170C. NEW

NEW PATCH PANEL IS NEEDED FOR THE 12 STRAND FIBER 5.

LOCATIONS AND NAMING PRIOR TO PERFORMING WORK.

4. CONFIRM AND IDENTIFY ALL MANHOLE/HANDHOLE

EMPTY.

(OR APPROVED EQUAL) INTO A 4” DUCT THAT IS CURRENTLY

OR THE PLACEMENT OF A MINIMUM OF 6 MAX CELL SLEEVES

APPROVED EQUAL) IN A 4”DUCT WITH EXISTING MAX CELL,

USE A MAX CELL SLEEVE (OR FOR FIBER STRAND ROUTING.

3. NEW INNERDUCT IS NEEDED FROM LVIP TO BUILDING 730

SERVICE ENTRANCE.

2. NEW DUCT BANK IS NEEDED FROM TEHH-3-3 TO LVIP

6,900'.

CONNECT FROM BUILDING 730 TO LVIP IS MEASURED TO BE

1. LENGTH OF NEW 12 STRAND FIBER CABLE NEEDED TO

GENERAL NOTES: