AM0003_W9128F-16-R-0084_SF30-16a_FINAL.pdf

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

FACILITY CODE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required) copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15C. DATE SIGNED

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

PAGE OF PAGES

6. ISSUED BY CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)

CODE

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

Previous edition unusable

W9128F-16-R-0084 AMENDMENT 0003

Section 00 22 00

12.2.1 Submission Requirements

Sub-paragraph 1, “Concurrent Projects.”

Delete:

Concurrent Projects: RDI contractors must have an ability to manage and execute work at more than one location at once. Submit descriptions of projects that were performed concurrently at two separate locations anywhere in the United States (CONUS), Alaska, or Hawaii, by the Prime.

Replace with:

Concurrent Projects: RDI contractors must have an ability to manage and execute work at more than one location at once. Submit descriptions of projects that were performed concurrently at two separate locations anywhere in the United States (CONUS), Alaska, Hawaii, or U.S. Territories, by the Prime.

Sub-paragraph 2, “Health and Safety.”

Delete:

2) Health and Safety. The Government seeks to determine whether the Offeror has consistently demonstrated a commitment to safety in the performance of its construction contracts by evaluating the Offeror’s Experience Modification Rating (EMR). Only the EMR information of the Offeror (Prime Contractor or Joint Venture identified on the SF 1442) will be evaluated and rated. Reference paragraph below on how JV’s will be rated.

a. Submit your firm’s EMR for construction contracts executed within the last three years.

i. If the Offeror is a newly formed JV with no history of EMR’s, then each participant of the JV shall submit its EMR’s for the past three consecutive years.

ii. If the Offeror is a new corporate entity with no EMR history, affirmatively state so. Newly formed companies will not be penalized for this substitution and the current EMR will be used in the evaluation. The Government reserves the right to verify the accuracy of EMRs and/or statements that no EMR history is available.

12.2.2 Determination of Technical Acceptability

All requirements stated for concurrent projects must be met. For Offerors’ with a 3-year history of EMR ratings, an average EMR rating of 1.0 or lower over the past three consecutive years will be acceptable. Offerors that have a history of EMR ratings that are less than 3 years will use the available EMR ratings for its development of the average. For example, an Offeror that has a 2-year history of EMR ratings, an average EMR rating of 1.0 or lower over the past two consecutive years will be acceptable. Offerors that affirmatively state that they do not have an EMR history will be rated as acceptable for this factor.

Replace with:

2) Health and Safety. The Government seeks to determine whether the Offeror has consistently demonstrated a commitment to safety in the performance of its construction contracts by evaluating either the Offeror’s Experience Modification Rating (EMR) or, alternatively, its OSHA “Days Away, Restricted or Transferred” (DART) rating. Offerors may elect which rating to submit (EMR or DART) to satisfy the Health and Safety requirement. Offerors are not required to submit both ratings.

a) EMR ratings:

1. Submit your firm’s EMR for construction contracts executed within the last three years. If the Offeror is a newly formed JV with no history of EMR’s, then each participant of the JV shall submit its EMR’s for the past three consecutive years. If the Offeror is a new corporate entity with no EMR history, affirmatively state so.

Newly formed companies will not be penalized for this substitution and the current EMR will be used in the evaluation. The Government reserves the right to verify the accuracy of EMRs and/or statements that no EMR history is available.

2. Only the EMR information of the Offeror (Prime Contractor or Joint Venture identified on the SF 1442) will be evaluated and rated.

b) DART ratings: Submit your firm’s current OSHA DART rating. Only the DART rating of the Offeror (Prime Contractor or Joint Venture identified on the SF 1442) will be evaluated and rated. If the Offeror is a newly formed JV with no DART rating, then each participant of the JV shall submit its DART ratings for the past three consecutive years. If the Offeror is a new corporate entity with no DART history, affirmatively state so. Newly formed companies will not be penalized for this substitution and the current DART rating will be used in the evaluation. The Government reserves the right to verify the accuracy of DART ratings and/or statements that no DART rating history is available.

12.2.2 Determination of Technical Acceptability

a) Concurrent projects requirements: All requirements stated for concurrent projects must be met.

b) Health and Safety requirements: Offerors will be considered technically acceptable if one of the following requirements are met:

1. EMR Rating: For Offerors with a 3-year history of EMR ratings, an average EMR rating of 1.0 or lower over the past three consecutive years will be acceptable.

Offerors that have a history of EMR ratings that are less than 3 years will use the available EMR ratings for its development of the average. For example, an Offeror that has a 2-year history of EMR ratings, an average EMR rating of 1.0 or lower over the past two consecutive years will be acceptable. Offerors that affirmatively state that they do not have an EMR history will be rated as acceptable for this factor.

2. DART rating: For Offerors with a 3-year history of DART ratings, an average DART rating of 2.0 or lower over the past three consecutive years will be acceptable.

Offerors that have a history of DART rating histories that are less than 3 years will use available DART ratings for its development of the average. For example, an Offeror that has a 2-year history of DART ratings, an average DART rating of 2.0 or lower over the past two consecutive years will be acceptable. Offerors that affirmatively state that they do not have a DART history will be rated as acceptable for this factor.

This amendment incorporates changes to Section 00 22 00 resulting from Bidder Inquiries for this solicitation.

There is NO EXTENSION to deadline for proposals granted as a result of this amendment.

CONTRACTING DIVISION

1616 CAPITOL AVE

OMAHA NE 68102-4901