Section 00 21 16 Attachments A_B_C in MS Word format.docx

DOCX document 50 KB Posted

Attached to
PN77881 FY21 Army Family Housing Replacement Construction, Kwajalein Atoll, Republic of the Marshall Islands
Solicitation number
W9128A-21-R-0009
Issued by

About this file

This document contains attachments to a solicitation for the Army Family Housing Replacement Construction project on Kwajalein Atoll in the Republic of the Marshall Islands. The solicitation number is W9128A-21-R-0009 and seeks to replace existing family housing. Offerors must complete experience questionnaires and provide references for relevant past projects involving design-build or design-bid-build construction. Experience in office buildings, barracks, warehouses, housing, hangars, road work and site improvements is preferred. The period of performance is to be determined with an anticipated award date in fiscal year 2021. Offerors will be evaluated on design and construction experience, past performance, and price. The selected contractor will be responsible for all aspects of the project including civil, architectural, structural, electrical and construction management services. The contracting agency is the Department of the Army Corps of Engineers Engineering District Honolulu.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ATTACHMENTS

Attachment A

EXPERIENCE INFORMATION

(To be completed by Contractor) If the Offeror is in a Joint Venture, identify which contractor in the Joint Venture Completed the contract.

Offeror’s Name:

Address:

DUNS:

CAGE Code:

Contract / Task Order(TO) Number:

Contract / TO Award Amount:

Final Contract Price:

Award Date (mm/dd/yy): Period of Performance:

Original Completion Date: Percent Complete: ______%

Actual Completion Date (with time extensions):

Work Performed as: |_| Prime Contractor |_| Sub Contractor |_| Joint Venture |_| Other (Explain) If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):

Percent of work self-performed: Specification Type: |_| Design-Build |_| Design-Bid-Build |_| Work Plan Construct

Contract Title and Location (city, state):

Contract Type: |_| Firm Fixed-Price |_| Cost Reimbursement |_| Other (Please specify)

Type of construction (office building, barracks, warehouse, housing, hangars, road work, site improvement, etc.):

Contract Description. Include the role of the contractor on the contract and specific responsibilities of the contractor in performance of the effort (civil, architectural, structural, electrical, security, historical, communications, etc.):

Type / scope of work and percent performed by the Offeror:

Type / scope of work and percent performed by Subcontractors:

Quality Awards, Letters of Appreciation, etc.

Project Owner or Project Manager for the Client – provide:

Name:

Address:

Telephone Number and E-mail:

Attachment B

Design Project Information Sheet

Name of Offeror (offeror on this RFP): ____________________________

Name of Designer (firm that did the design work for this project): _____________________________

Indicate if the design on this project was completed by the Offeror, Joint Venture Teaming Member (on this RFP, shown in a signed Joint Venture Agreement), or by the Offeror’s proposed design subcontractor (on this RFP), as the Designer of Record (DOR):

Provide information for relevant projects to be used for Design Experience evaluation purposes. For each project, provide the following information (use additional sheets as necessary):

a. Type of project (check one):

_____Design-Bid-Build _____ Design-Build

b. Contract Number, Task Order Number and Project Title:

c. Location (where the project was or will be constructed):

d. Identify the Designer of Record for the project. Also, if the Offeror was involved in the project, identify the nature of the offeror’s involvement in the project.

e. Cost of Project Estimated construction cost: _____________________ Design amount: ___________________________

f. General Scope of Project:

g. Identify key work disciplines the design company/firm employed on this project:

h. Period of Performance:

Start Date: _______________________ Date Completed: _______________________

i. Provide 2 Points of Contact for Client/Agency (if client is the U.S. Government, provide name and address of contracting office, contract number, name and telephone number of Contracting Officer):

If unable to provide two (2) points of contact, provide at least one (1) point of contact.

(1) Name _______________________________ Telephone No. ___________________________ Fax No. ________________________________ E-mail: _______________________________________ Address: ___________________________________________________________

(2) Name _______________________________ Telephone No. ___________________________ Fax No. ________________________________ E-mail: _______________________________________ Address: ___________________________________________________________

SAMPLE TRANSMITTAL LETTER AND PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONAIRE

To: Date:

We have listed your firm as a reference for work we have performed for you as listed below. Our firm has submitted a proposal under a project advertised by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Honolulu District. In accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR), an evaluation of our firm’s past performance will be completed by the Corps of Engineers. Your candid response to the attached questionnaire will assist the evaluation team in this process.

We understand that you have a busy schedule and your participation in this evaluation is greatly appreciated. Please complete the enclosed questionnaire as thoroughly as possible. Space is provided for comments. Please respond in time for us to include the questionnaire with our proposal, which is due on ___________. Only one response from each office is required. If at all possible, we suggest that you individually answer this questionnaire and then coordinate your responses with that ________________, to forge a consensus on one overall response from your organization. Please return completed questionnaires to the following:

If you would prefer to respond directly to USACE, your completed questionnaire may be sent to the following address:

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Honolulu District Contracting Division (Tracy N. Tenholder) Building 230, Otake Street Fort Shafter, Hawaii 96858-5440

The questionnaires can also be e-mailed to Tracy.N.Tenholder@usace.army.mil

Attachment C

USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ-0)

CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)

1. Contractor Information
Firm Name:CAGE Code:
Address:DUNs Number:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:

2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain) Percent of contract work performed:

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):

3. Contract Information Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract Type: Firm Fixed-Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please specify): Contract Title:

Contract Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Explain Differences:

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable): Explain Differences:

4. Project Description:
Complexity of Work:HighMediumRoutine

How is this contract relevant to contract of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)

CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)

5. Client Information Name:

Title:

Phone Number: Email Address:

6. Describe the client’s role in the contract:

7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):

8. Client’s Signature:

NOTE: USACE REQUESTS THAT THE CLIENT COMPLETES THIS QUESTIONNAIRE AND SUBMITS DIRECTLY BACK TO THE OFFEROR. THE OFFEROR WILL SUBMIT THE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO USACE WITH ITS PROPOSAL, AND MAY DUPLICATE THIS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FUTURE SUBMISSION ON USACE SOLICITATIONS. CLIENTS ARE HIGHLY ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT QUESTIONNAIRES DIRECTLY TO THE OFFEROR. HOWEVER, QUESTIONNAIRES MAY BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO USACE. PLEASE CONTACT THE OFFEROR FOR USACE POC INFORMATION. THE GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO VERIFY ANY AND ALL INFORMATION ON THIS FORM.

ADJECTIVAL RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE

RATING
DEFINITION
NOTE
(E) Exceptional
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit.

The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.

An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

(VG) Very Good
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor

were effective.

A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.

(S) Satisfactory
Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the

contract.

(M) Marginal
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective

or were not fully implemented.

A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.

(U) Unsatisfactory
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an

unsatisfactory rating.

(N) Not Applicable
No information or did not apply to your contract
Rating will be neither positive nor negative.

TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT

PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVAL RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.

1. QUALITY:

a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts
E
VG
S
M
U
N
b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance
E
VG
S
M
U
N
c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance
E
VG
S
M
U
N

d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance)

E

VG

S

M

U

N

2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below)

E

VG

S

M

U

N

b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract
E
VG
S
M
U
N

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project?
E
VG
S
M
U
N

b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes; responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication)

E

VG

S

M

U

N

c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer?
E
VG
S
M
U
N
d) Overall customer satisfaction
E
VG
S
M
U
N

4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR

a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force?
E
VG
S
M
U
N
b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort
E
VG
S
M
U
N
c) Government Property Control
E
VG
S
M
U
N
d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel
E
VG
S
M
U
N
e) Utilization of Small Business concerns
E
VG
S
M
U
N
f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines
E
VG
S
M
U
N
g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes
E
VG
S
M
U
N
h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)
E
VG
S
M
U
N

5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)?
E
VG
S
M
U
N

PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVAL RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.

b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client
E
VG
S
M
U
N

c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back- up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns)

VG

S

M

U

N

d) Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section.

Yes

No

e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.

Yes

No

f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below.

Yes

No

6. SAFETY/SECURITY

a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues? (Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.)

E

VG

S

M

U

N

b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements.

E
VG
S
M
U
N

7. GENERAL

a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues).

VG

S

M

U

N

b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues)
E
VG
S
M
U
N

c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below)

Yes

No

d) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor.
E
VG
S
M
U
N

Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks. Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary):

v

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .