Sources Sought Synopsis Market Survey_IDBIO MATOC 6.0 W9127S25RA002_Revised.docx
DOCX document 31 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W9127S25R6021
About this file
This document is a Sources Sought Synopsis Market Survey for an Integrated Design Build Initial Outfitting (iDBIO) Multiple Award Task Order Contract (MATOC) supporting the Defense Health Agency (DHA). The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Little Rock District is seeking contractors to provide design, renovation, and construction services for healthcare facilities across CONUS, OCONUS, U.S. Territories, and foreign locations. The contract is estimated at $2.5 billion over seven years, with individual task orders ranging from $2 million to $90 million and an average task order value of $37 million.
The solicitation is open to all business types, with specific encouragement for Small Business, 8(a), HUBZone, Women-Owned Small Business (WOSB), and Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) firms. Potential contractors must demonstrate capabilities to manage multiple simultaneous projects (minimum of five) across four geographic regions: West, Central, East, and U.S. Territories. The procurement will follow FAR Part 15 using a "Best Value" trade-off process with a competitive, firm-fixed-price approach. Key dates include an anticipated solicitation release on December 15, 2025, with proposal submissions due January 22, 2026, and a response deadline of April 25, 2025.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
CAPABILITIES SURVEY
Design Build (DB) Construction Services, Multiple Award Task Order Contract (MATOC) in Support of the Defense Health Agency (DHA) W9127S-25-R-A002 Formerly W9127S-25-R-6021
Date:
1. Company Information:
Company Name:
Company Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) Code:
Company Unique Entity ID (UEI) (at SAM.gov):
Address / City / State / Zip:
Point of Contact Name & Title:
Phone Number:
Email Address:
2. Size of Company (“X” by all that apply)
Large Business
Small Business
8(a)
HUB Zone
Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business
Woman-Owned Small Business
3. Firm's Bonding Capability (construction bonding level per contract and aggregate construction bonding level, both expressed in dollars).
Construction Bonding Level (per contract) Construction Bonding Level (aggregate)
4. With regard to Design Build (DB) Construction Services Scope of Work as described in the Sources Sought Announcement:
As the PRIME contractor, provide at least 3 projects you have performed with a similar scope, comparable work performed within the past 5 years. Give a brief description of the project, location of project, dollar value, customer name, timeliness of performance, and customer satisfaction.
Project 1:
Brief Description of Project:
Location of Project:
Dollar Value:
Customer Name:
Timeliness of Performance:
Customer Satisfaction:
Comments:
Project 2:
Brief Description of Project:
Location of Project:
Dollar Value:
Customer Name:
Timeliness of Performance:
Customer Satisfaction:
Comments:
Project 3:
Brief Description of Project:
Location of Project:
Dollar Value:
Customer Name:
Timeliness of Performance:
Customer Satisfaction:
Comments:
5. With regard to Design Build (DB) Construction Services Scope of Work as described in the Sources Sought Announcement:
Provide number of projects performed as Prime Contractor or Sub-Contractor in the past 5 years according to contract/task order value for each region below.
a. Region 1, West: States of AK, AZ, CA, HI, ID, MT, NV, NM, OR, UT, WA, and the US Territory, Guam.
Number of projects performed according to contract/task order value:
| Value |
| Number of Projects |
as Prime Contractor Number of Projects as Sub-Contractor
<$500 K
$500 K - $1 M
$1 M - $5 M
$5 M - $10 M
>$10 M
b. Region 2, West Central: States of AR, CO, IA, KS, LA, MN, MO, NE, ND, OK, SD, TX and WY.
| Value |
| Number of Projects |
as Prime Contractor Number of Projects
<$500 K
$500 K - $1 M
$1 M - $5 M
$5 M - $10 M
>$10 M
c. Region 3, East Central: States of AL, FL, GA, IL, IN, KY, MI, MS, OH, SC, TN, and WI.
| Value |
| Number of Projects |
as Prime Contractor Number of Projects
<$500 K
$500 K - $1 M
$1 M - $5 M
$5 M - $10 M
>$10 M
d. Region 4, Northeast. States of CT, DE, ME, MD, MA, NH, NJ, NY, NC, PA, RI, VT, VA, WV, and the US Territories of Puerto Rico, Cuba and the U.S. Virgin Islands.
| Value |
| Number of Projects |
as Prime Contractor Number of Projects
<$500 K
$500 K - $1 M
$1 M - $5 M
$5 M - $10 M
>$10 M
6. Identify the number of projects that you have managed simultaneously over multiple regions. Place an 'x' in the appropriate line.
0 Projects
2 Projects
3 Projects
4 Projects
5 Projects
Over 5 Projects
7. List the NAICS codes that apply to your firm:
NOTE: The program is expected to be approximately $2.5 Billion over seven (7) years. If the program is divided into regions, the requirements each year would NOT be divided equally among the regions. In a nationwide contract, the competing MATOC contractors would have an equal opportunity to compete for ALL Design Build requirements.
8. Statement of Interest
Yes, this firm is interested in bidding on the solicitation when it is issued.
9. Which areas would your firm be interested in and capable of performing in?
(“X” by all that apply)
Region 1, West:
States of AK, AZ, CA, HI, ID, MT, NV, NM, OR, UT, WA, and the US Territory, Guam.
Region 2, West Central:
States of AR, CO, IA, KS, LA, MN, MO, NE, ND, OK, SD, TX and WY.
Region 3, East Central: States of AL, FL, GA, IL, IN, KY, MI, MS, OH, SC, TN, and WI.
Region 4, Northeast: States of CT, DE, ME, MD, MA, NH, NJ, NY, NC, PA, RI, VT, VA, WV, and the US Territories of Puerto Rico, Cuba and the U.S. Virgin Islands.
National: All US States + US Territories Guam, Puerto Rico, Cuba and the U.S. Virgin Islands
10. For which concept (Regional MATOC or National MATOC) would your firm be most competitive?
Regional MATOC
National MATOC
11. Are there advantages for your firm to participate in Regional MATOC contracts?
a.
b.
c.
12. Are there disadvantages for your firm to participate in Regional MATOC contracts?
a.
b.
c.
13. Are there advantages for your firm to participate in National MATOC contracts?
a.
b.
c.
14. Are there disadvantages for your firm to participate in National MATOC contracts?
a.
b.
c.
-END-
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .