Sources Sought Synopsis Market Survey_IDBIO MATOC 6.0_W9127S25R6021.docx
DOCX document 29 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W9127S25R6021
About this file
This is a Capabilities Survey form for a Sources Sought announcement seeking information from potential contractors for an IDIQ Multiple Award Task Order Contract (MATOC) supporting the Defense Health Agency's Design Build Construction Services. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Little Rock District is planning a $2.5 billion contract over seven years for Design Build construction services supporting DHA's Sustainment, Restoration, and Modernization program.
The survey requests detailed company information including size status, bonding capabilities, and past performance on similar projects within the last 5 years across four geographic regions (West, Central, East, and U.S. Territories). Companies must demonstrate experience managing multiple simultaneous projects across regions and indicate their preference and capabilities for either a Regional or National MATOC approach. The government is specifically seeking feedback from all business types, including small businesses, 8(a), HUBZone, WOSB, and SDVOSB firms, to determine appropriate set-aside decisions for the eventual competitive, firm-fixed-price procurement under FAR Part 15 using best value trade-off.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
CAPABILITIES SURVEY
Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Multiple Award Task Order Contract (MATOC) For Design Build (DB) Construction Services in Support of the Defense Health Agency (DHA) W9127S-25-R-6021
Date:
1. Company Information:
Company Name:
Company Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) Code:
Company Unique Entity ID (UEI) (at SAM.gov):
Address / City / State / Zip:
Point of Contact Name & Title:
Phone Number:
Email Address:
2. Size of Company (“X” by all that apply)
Large Business
Small Business
8(a)
HUB Zone
Service-Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business
Woman-Owned Small Business
3. Firm's Bonding Capability (construction bonding level per contract and aggregate construction bonding level, both expressed in dollars).
Construction Bonding Level (per contract) Construction Bonding Level (aggregate)
4. With regard to Design Build (DB) Construction Services Scope of Work as described in the Sources Sought Announcement:
As the PRIME contractor, provide at least 3 projects you have performed with a similar scope, comparable work performed within the past 5 years. Give a brief description of the project, location of project, dollar value, customer name, timeliness of performance, and customer satisfaction.
Project 1:
Brief Description of Project:
Location of Project:
Dollar Value:
Customer Name:
Timeliness of Performance:
Customer Satisfaction:
Comments:
Project 2:
Brief Description of Project:
Location of Project:
Dollar Value:
Customer Name:
Timeliness of Performance:
Customer Satisfaction:
Comments:
Project 3:
Brief Description of Project:
Location of Project:
Dollar Value:
Customer Name:
Timeliness of Performance:
Customer Satisfaction:
Comments:
5. With regard to Design Build (DB) Construction Services Scope of Work as described in the Sources Sought Announcement:
Provide number of projects performed as Prime Contractor or Sub-Contractor in the past 5 years according to contract/task order value for each region below.
a. West Region: States of AZ, CA, AK, HI, ID, WY, NV, UT, MT, CO, NM, OR, and WA.
Number of projects performed according to contract/task order value:
| Value |
| Number of Projects |
as Prime Contractor Number of Projects as Sub-Contractor
<$500 K
$500 K - $1 M
$1 M - $5 M
$5 M - $10 M
>$10 M
b. Central Region: States of ND, SD, NE, KS, OK, TX, LA, AR, MO, IO, MN, WI, MI, ID, OH, KY, TN, MS, and AL.
| Value |
| Number of Projects |
as Prime Contractor Number of Projects
<$500 K
$500 K - $1 M
$1 M - $5 M
$5 M - $10 M
>$10 M
c. East Region: States of MD, DC, NH, MA, DE, CT, FL, VA, NJ, WV, FL, GA, SC and NC.
| Value |
| Number of Projects |
as Prime Contractor Number of Projects
<$500 K
$500 K - $1 M
$1 M - $5 M
$5 M - $10 M
>$10 M
d. US Territories.
| Value |
| Number of Projects |
as Prime Contractor Number of Projects
<$500 K
$500 K - $1 M
$1 M - $5 M
$5 M - $10 M
>$10 M
6. Identify the number of projects that you have managed simultaneously over multiple regions. Place an 'x' in the appropriate line.
0 Projects
2 Projects
3 Projects
4 Projects
5 Projects
Over 5 Projects
7. List the NAICS codes that apply to your firm:
NOTE: The program is expected to be approximately $2,500,000,000.00 Billion over seven (7) years. If the program is divided into regions, the requirements each year would not be divided equally among the regions, which is subject to change each year. In a nationwide contract, the competing MATOC contractors would have an equal opportunity to compete for all Design Build requirements.
8. For which concept (Regional MATOC or National MATOC) would your firm be most competitive?
Regional MATOC
National MATOC
9. Are there advantages for your firm to participate in Regional MATOC contracts?
a.
b.
c.
10. Are there disadvantages for your firm to participate in Regional MATOC contracts?
a.
b.
c.
11. Are there advantages for your firm to participate in National MATOC contracts?
a.
b.
c.
12. Are there disadvantages for your firm to participate in National MATOC contracts?
a.
b.
c.
-END-
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .