A.07.23_-_Combined_Synopsis_Solicitation_18R6030.pdf

W9127S18R6030

This is a combined synopsis/solicitation for commercial items prepared in accordance with the format in Subpart 12.6, as supplemented with additional information included in this notice. This announcement constitutes the only solicitation; proposals are being requested and a written solicitation will not be issued.

Solicitation # W9127S18R6030. This solicitation is issued as a request for proposal (RFP).

Solicitation document and incorporated provisions and clauses are those in effect through Federal Acquisition Circular 2005-98, effective May 1, 2018.

This is a total small business set-aside. NAICS code is 337127, size standard is 500 employees.

All proposals shall be submitted no later than August 22, 2018, by 1:00pm central time.

*** Notice of Evaluation in Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System The contract awardee shall be subject to Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) evaluations. ***

CONTRACT CLAUSES/SOLICITATION PROVISIONS

The provision at 52.212-1, Instructions to Offerors -- Commercial, applies to this acquisition.

All offers shall include a completed copy of the provision at 52.212-3, Offeror Representations and Certifications -- Commercial Items Alternate I (Oct 2014).

The clause at 52.212-4, Contract Terms and Conditions -- Commercial Items, applies to this acquisition. The addendum to FAR 52.212-4 also applies to this acquisition.

Please contact Timothy Pighee for all solicitation documents at timothy.a.pighee@usace.army.mil.

ADDENDUM TO FAR 52.212-1,

1. Submission of Offers. Submit signed and dated offer at or before the exact time specified in this solicitation. Failure to provide all required documents or information may exclude the offeror(s) from further consideration. Both the electronic copy and paper/hard copy offer will be accepted at the address identified below. Emailed and faxed proposals will not be considered.

Submit proposals to:

CONTRACTING DIVISION

USACE, LITTLE ROCK (W9127S)

ATTN: TIMOTHY PIGHEE

700 W. CAPITOL AVENUE, RM 7315

LITTLE ROCK AR 72201-3225

The Packaging:

The Proposals shall be marked:

“Proposals for Solicitation Number: W9127S-18-R-6030, Defense Health Agency – Walter Reed National Military Medical Center (WRNMMC) Urology Department Initial Outfitting, “DO

NOT OPEN”

a. Electronic submissions via email or fax will not be accepted. Offers should be mailed through a commercial/Government carrier or hand carried.

b. This is an electronic solicitation release. No hard copies will be mailed. Amendments to the solicitation will be posted through the Federal Business Opportunities www.fbo.gov website. It is the responsibility of each Offeror to review the webpage for notice of amendments, updates, or changes to current information.

c. All interested offerors must contact Mr. Timothy Pighee for access to all solicitation attachments at Timothy.A.Pighee@usace.army.mil. All offerors shall include the following information with request:

Company Name Employee Name Email Address Telephone Number

d. Questions and/or comments relative to these documents should be submitted via e-mail to the

Contract Specialist who is the primary point of contact Mr. Timothy Pighee at Timothy.A.Pighee@usace.army.mil.

e. The Technical inquiries and questions relating to proposal procedures are to be submitted via ProjNet at http://www.projnet.org/projnet . To submit and review bid inquiry items, bidders will need to be a current registered user or self-register into system. To self-register go to web page identified above please use the following directions:

Click BID tab select Bidder Inquiry, select agency USACE; enter Key for this solicitation listed below, and your e-mail address, click login.

Fill in all required information and click create user. Verify that information on next screen is correct and click continue.

From this page you may view all proposal inquiries or add inquiry

Offerors will receive an acknowledgement of their question via email, followed by an answer to their question after it has been processed by our technical team.

The Solicitation Number is: W9127S-18-R-6030 The Bidder Inquiry Key is: 9Z7MW5-XZNS8K The Review will be open from July 25, 2018 through August 1, 2018

Offerors are requested to review the solicitation in its entirety, review the Bidder Inquiry System for answers to questions prior to submission of a new inquiry.

Offers will NOT be publicly opened. Information concerning the status of the evaluation and/or award will NOT be available after receipt of proposals

Oral explanations or instructions are not binding. Any information given to an offeror which impacts the solicitation and/or offer will be given in the form of a written amendment to the solicitation.

As this is a competitive negotiation acquisition, there is no public bid opening and no information will be given out as to the number of Offerors or the results of the competition until an award is made.

2. General Instructions. These instructions are designed to provide general guidance for preparing proposals as well as providing specific instructions on proposal organization, format, and content. Offerors shall include all documents and information requested and should be submitted in accordance with the instructions.

The Offeror is cautioned to follow the instructions carefully, as the Government reserves the right to make an award based on initial proposals received without discussion. However, the Government reserves the right to request clarifications if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary.

a. If an offeror believes that the requirements in these instructions contain an error, an ambiguity, omission, or are otherwise unsound, the offeror shall immediately notify the PCO in writing with supporting rationale prior to the close of the Solicitation.

b. The proposal must be presented in a manner that clearly addresses the requirements, as set forth in the Statement of Work. Proposals that are overly verbose or include marketing material may distract from the evaluators’ ability to ascertain compliance with the solicitation.

3. Team/Team Member(s)/Teaming Partner(s). The Government will consider the offeror and all subcontractors a “team” when evidence of a signed Teaming Arrangement or Letter of Intent is provided.

This RFP will refer to the offeror and all identified teaming subcontractors as a “team.” This RFP will refer to all identified teaming subcontractors as “team members” or “teaming partners.” The offeror shall identify any Team/Team Members in their Executive Summary and briefly describe how the Teaming Arrangement will be support this requirement.

4. Proposal Preparation Instructions. Offeror’s proposal will consist of two (2) separate volumes: Price and Technical.

Proposal Format. All pages of each offer must be appropriately numbered and identified with the solicitation number in the header and/or footer of each page. If the RFP page limits are exceeded, the pages in excess of the limit will be removed and not evaluated.

Hard Copy format and electronic copies on CDs are both required in this submission, please see table below for specific numbers. Volume I and Volume II shall be submitted on two (2) separate CD-ROMs. Page limitations are also annotated.

Volume Contents Format Number Of

Copies Maximum Page

Limit

Volume I Price Proposal

TAB A - Executive Summary

TAB B -Signed SF 30

TAB C - Attachment 1, Bid Schedule Worksheet

TAB D - Representations and

Certifications and Other Statements of Offerors

Adobe PDF for all documents.

MS Excel 2007 or Later for Attachment 1, Bid Schedule

Worksheet

2 CD ROMs

1 Hard Copy

None

Volume II

Technical Proposal

Past

Performance

TAB A – Corporate Experience

(5 page limit)

TAB B - Team Qualifications

TAB C - Master Schedule

TAB D - Commodity Specifications

(no page limit)

TAB E - Past Performance (12 page limit)

Adobe PDF

2 CD ROMs

1 Hard Copy

8.5 x 11 inch paper, 12 pt. font or larger, with the exception of the IO Master Schedule. The IO Master Schedule may be a larger paper size format.

Volume Labels. All original volumes and copies will have cover sheets that identify volume number, title, copy number or “Original,” solicitation number, and Offeror’s name

What Counts As A Page? A page shall be an 8 ½ X 11” sheet of paper, with the exception of the sample integrated master schedule. When both sides of a sheet display printed material, it shall be counted as two pages (For paper/hard copies). Letter size and spacing requirements for illustrations and tables can be at the discretion of the offeror but must be easily readable. Margins shall be at least 1 inch on the top and bottom and 3/4 inch on the side. The Contractor shall number each page in order to eliminate any confusion. In the event contractor creates an ambiguity in their numbering of pages, the Government may exercise its own discretion in counting pages.

Page Limit Includes: All Appendices, Charts, Graphs, Diagrams, Tables, Photographs, Drawings, etc.

Page Limit Does Not Include (For Paper/Hard Copies): Title Page, Table of Contents, Lists of tables and drawings and/or Cross Reference Matrix’s, covers for Volumes, Glossary of Terms/Abbreviations and Acronyms, Indices, and section dividers. Cross-references should be utilized to preclude unnecessary duplication of data between sections.

Copies. Volume I and Volume II shall each have their own CD-ROM.

Proposal Labels. The exterior of the envelope or box containing proposal Volumes, either mailed or hand delivered, shall be labeled with Offeror’s name, title, solicitation number, and marked “ Package X of X” (with “X” indicating the number of packages) and “To be Delivered Unopened to the Contracting Officer.”

Electronic Copies.

a. All electronic copies of volumes shall be submitted on its own CD-ROM disk with a separate file for each Tab in Volumes I and II.

b. Volume I will be submitted using Adobe PDF and Microsoft Office Excel 2007 for Attachment 1, Bid Schedule Worksheet. Volume II shall be submitted using Adobe PDF.

c. Sound or video (e.g. MPEG) files should not be embedded into the proposal files.

d. The CD-ROM and protective sleeve will be clearly marked as to volume number, Offeror's name, solicitation title, solicitation number, and marked as “Initial” or “Revision X,” with “X” indicating the number of the revision. Elaborate CD-ROM disk labels are not required or desired.

Glossary of Abbreviations and Acronyms. Each volume will contain a glossary of all abbreviations and acronyms used, with an explanation for each.

No pricing information is to be presented in any part of the proposal outside of the Volume I.

Change Pages After Initial Proposal Submission. If the Government opens discussions and requests the offeror submit proposal revisions, during or after discussions, any changed pages that are submitted will be a different color from the original proposal pages, and will have changed information clearly marked by a vertical line in the right margin of the page identifying the changed content. The date of the revision and revision number will be reflected on each changed page (preferably on, or next to, the vertical change line).

Make spreadsheet revisions obvious by highlighting cells that changed. Page limitations may also be placed on responses to Evaluation Notice (ENs). The Government will identify specified page limits for ENs responses in the letters forwarding the ENs to the offeror.

a. Volume I – Price Proposal

TAB A – Executive Summary. Provide an executive summary that describes the significant attributes and theme of its proposal and introduces the contractor’s team. This should also include a contact list (with phone numbers, fax numbers, mailing addresses, e-mail addresses, etc.) to include personnel authorized to sign for and to negotiate on behalf of their company.

TAB B – Signed SF 30 Acknowledgement of all amendments. The contractor shall acknowledge all amendments to the RFP.

TAB C – Contract Pricing Schedule, to include all supporting data. The pricing schedule shall be submitted fully completed and error free. It shall contain the Offeror’s prices for the established Contract Line Item Numbers (CLINs). Please submit the following information to support your IO pricing and understanding:

Offerors shall propose pricing in the MS Excel spreadsheet entitled “Attachment 1 – Bid Schedule”

It is the offerors responsibility to ensure the spreadsheet calculates pricing correctly. The offeror may correct the spreadsheet as required. The Offeror shall provide the data as described below for the Government’s price analysis.

Summary Tab Price each CLIN here.

CLIN 0001 price shall come from CLIN 0001 Commodity & Design Validation tab OPTION CLIN 1002 price shall come from CLIN 1002 Transition, Commodities & Activation tab OPTION CLIN 1003 price shall come from CLIN 1003 OP Equipment tab

CLIN 0001 Commodity & Design Validation tab Offeror shall input the unit price of each commodity. The unit price shall not be inclusive installation, tax, profit, overhead, or other burdened factors. The unit price will automatically multiply by the quantity to provide the Total Price.

At a minimum, bid labor categories shall include:

1. Project Manager

2. Transition Planner/Relocation Specialist

3. Medical Equipment Planner

4. Interior Designer

5. BMET

6. Low Voltage/IT Consultant

7. Quality Control Manager

8. Public Affairs Coordinator.

Bid their Fully Burdened Labor rate, exclusive of profit and overhead Propose the estimated hours the labor category will work.

The Labor Subtotal shall be the multiple of the labor rate and estimated hours Bid Other Direct Costs, such as printing, travel, etc.

Profit % and Overhead % shall be calculated using the Subtotal

CLIN 1002 Transition, Commodities, & Activation

The Total Price from tab OM Commodity will self-populate in cell B1 At a minimum, bid labor categories shall include:

1. Project Manager

2. Transition Planner/Relocation Specialist

3. Medical Equipment Planner

4. Interior Designer

5. BMET

6. Low Voltage/IT Consultant

7. Quality Control Manager

8. Public Affairs Coordinator.

Bid their Fully Burdened Labor rate, exclusive of profit and overhead Propose the estimated hours the labor category will work.

The Labor Subtotal shall be the multiple of the labor rate and estimated hours Bid Other Direct Costs, such as printing, travel, etc.

Profit % and Overhead % shall be calculated using the Subtotal

OM Commodities tab Offeror shall input the unit price of each commodity in Column I. The unit price shall not be inclusive of installation, tax, profit, overhead, or other burdened factors. The unit price will automatically multiply by the quantity to provide the Total Price. Prices will sum at the bottom in the “Commodities Total” box.

CLIN 1003 OP Equipment tab Offeror shall input the unit price of each commodity in Column H. The unit price shall not be inclusive of installation, tax, profit, overhead, or other burdened factors. The unit price will automatically multiply by the quantity to provide the Total Price. Prices will sum at the bottom in the “OP-Equipment Total” box.

The total commodity price will total at the bottom of the spreadsheet.

TAB D - Representation, Certifications, and Other Statements of Offerors. The offeror will ensure that Representation, Certifications, and Other Statements are submitted thoroughly completed with all blocks in each certification/representation completed truthfully and completely.

b. Volume II – Technical Proposal. The Technical proposal shall not exceed the specified page limits listed in the table above. The Government will not review any information submitted in an appendix or attachment to the proposal in excess of the established limits. The offeror shall comply with the page limitations. The Offeror shall not submit verbatim sections of the solicitation or SOW as part of their technical proposal. Offerors that do not meet these requirements may be subject to rejection. The Technical proposal shall not include any cost or price information.

The Technical Proposal should include, at a minimum, the following information:

TAB A – Corporate Experience This tab shall address Factor 1: Corporate Experience, in solicitation provision 52.212-2, Evaluation— Commercial Items.

Offerors shall include a minimum of three (3) project information sheets for their corporate experience (to include any sub-contractor or teaming member for which corporate experience is being presented).

Offerors shall not include a listing of projects. At a minimum, the following information shall be included on each project information sheet:

Customer Location General Scope Size Dollar Value Percent complete or date completed Any problems encounter and how, those problems were overcome Customer POC with telephone number

TAB B - Team Qualification This tab shall address Factor 2: Team Qualifications, in solicitation provision 52.212-2, Evaluation— Commercial Items.

Offerors shall provide a staffing matrix which identifies all personnel on their team and the qualifications that they possess in order to satisfy the minimum requirements of Section VI in the Statement of Work.

At a minimum, the following information shall be included:

Qualifications Project location and general scope Size and dollar value Team member role and responsibilities Percent complete or date completed

TAB C – Master Schedule This tab shall address Factor 3: Master Schedule Approach, in solicitation provision 52.212-2, Evaluation—Commercial Items.

Offeror’s shall submit a sample IO Master Schedule, using the Statement of Work, focusing on the Offeror’s ability to schedule and coordinate critical aspects of the IO process.

In addition to the sample IO Master Schedule, Offeror may use additional space allowed in the page count to describe their Master Schedule Approach in answering the evaluation criteria stated in solicitation provision 52.212-2, Evaluation—Commercial Items.

TAB D – Commodity Specifications This tab shall include the cut sheets or specifications of all commodities that are being priced in the offerors. Cut sheets shall include all product specifications. All cut sheets shall be organized in JSN alpha/numeric order.

TAB E – Past Performance

The Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) included in the solicitation is provided for the offeror or its team members to submit to the client for each project the offeror includes in its proposal for Factor 3 of all relevant (same or similar items) health- care/IO contracts of the Prime Contractor that are complete or at least 50% complete within the last 3 years. Ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact.

Completed Past Performance Questionnaires should be submitted with your proposal. If the offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the offeror should complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ (Attachment 1), which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. Completion of the Past Performance Questionnaire is solely the responsibility of the offeror.

If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government’s point of contact, Mr. Timothy Pighee via email at timothy.a.pighee@usace.army.mil prior to proposal closing date.

Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation.

Offerors may provide details on past performance problems and corrective actions taken as a part of the proposal. When an Offeror’s firm is divided into severable segments (e.g., division, group, unit) the Government will evaluate only the past performance of those segments of the firm that will actually perform the work. Additionally, if Offeror has no relevant past performance, information may be provided for key subcontractors.

The offeror shall submit, along with the information required in this paragraph, a consent letter, executed by each subcontractor, teaming partner, and/or joint venture partner, authorizing release of adverse past performance information to the offeror so the offeror can respond to such information.

For each identified effort for a commercial customer, the offeror shall also submit a client authorization letter, authorizing release to the Government of requested information on the Offeror's performance.

Recency Assessment. To be recent, the effort must be ongoing or must have been performed during the past three (3) years from the date of issuance of this RFP. Information that fails the recency assessment will not be evaluated.

Relevancy Assessment. To be relevant, the effort must be similar to the nature of work, size, magnitude, complexity and scope to the work required by this RFP. The Government will conduct an in-depth evaluation of all recent performance information provided to determine if it is the same or similar in nature, size, and complexity to the services/products being procured under this RFP. In determining relevancy for individual contracts, consideration will be given to the effort, or portion of the effort, being proposed by the offeror, teaming partner, or subcontractor whose contract is being reviewed and evaluated. Relevant experience information that fails this condition will not be evaluated.

The Government reserves the right to obtain past performance data from other sources than those identified by the offeror in evaluating past performance. This includes, but not limited to, the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), or other databases; interviews with Program Managers, Contracting Officers, and Fee Determining Officials; and the Defense Contract Management Agency. Offerors are reminded that both independent data and data provided by Offerors in their proposals may be used by the Government to evaluate offeror past performance. However, the burden of providing thorough, complete, and current past performance information as requested in this paragraph remains with the Offerors. Proposals that do not contain the information requested by this paragraph risk rejection or a less than acceptable performance rating by the Government.

All past performance comments received will be taken into account and could affect the overall rating. The overall past performance evaluation is a subjective decision based on the whole of all data received. In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305 (a)(2)(iv)). Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, “unknown” shall be considered “acceptable.

While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the Offeror.

(End of provision)

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

52.203-11 Certification And Disclosure Regarding Payments To

Influence Certain Federal Transactions

SEP 2007

52.203-16 Preventing Personal Conflicts of Interest DEC 2011 52.204-4 Printed or Copied Double-Sided on Postconsumer Fiber

Content Paper

MAY 2011

52.204-9 Personal Identity Verification of Contractor Personnel JAN 2011 52.204-10 Reporting Executive Compensation and First-Tier

Subcontract Awards

OCT 2016

52.204-13 System for Award Management Maintenance OCT 2016 52.204-16 Commercial and Government Entity Code Reporting JUL 2016 52.204-19 Incorporation by Reference of Representations and

Certifications.

DEC 2014

52.209-2 Prohibition on Contracting with Inverted Domestic Corporations--Representation

NOV 2015

52.209-6 Protecting the Government's Interest When Subcontracting With Contractors Debarred, Suspended, or Proposed for Debarment

OCT 2015

52.209-10 Prohibition on Contracting With Inverted Domestic Corporations

NOV 2015

52.217-5 Evaluation Of Options JUL 1990 52.219-6 Notice Of Total Small Business Set-Aside NOV 2011 52.219-8 Utilization of Small Business Concerns NOV 2016 52.219-14 Limitations On Subcontracting JAN 2017 52.219-28 52.222-50

Post-Award Small Business Program Representation Combating Trafficking in Persons

JUL 2013

MAR 2015

52.223-18 Encouraging Contractor Policies To Ban Text Messaging While Driving

AUG 2011

52.225-1 Buy American--Supplies MAY 2014 52.225-13 Restrictions on Certain Foreign Purchases JUN 2008 52.225-25 Prohibition on Contracting with Entities Engaging in Certain

Activities or Transactions Relating to Iran-- Representation and Certifications.

OCT 2015

52.228-5 Insurance - Work On A Government Installation JAN 1997 52.232-11 Extras APR 1984 52.232-40 Providing Accelerated Payments to Small Business

Subcontractors

DEC 2013

52.233-3 Protest After Award AUG 1996 52.233-4 Applicable Law for Breach of Contract Claim OCT 2004

52.237-2 Protection Of Government Buildings, Equipment, And Vegetation

APR 1984

52.242-13 Bankruptcy JUL 1995 52.242-15 Stop-Work Order AUG 1989 52.246-16 Responsibility For Supplies APR 1984 52.251-1 Government Supply Sources APR 2012 252.201-7000 Contracting Officer's Representative DEC 1991 252.203-7000 Requirements Relating to Compensation of Former DoD

Officials

SEP 2011

252.203-7002 Requirement to Inform Employees of Whistleblower Rights SEP 2013 252.203-7005 Representation Relating to Compensation of Former DoD

Officials

NOV 2011

252.204-7003 Control Of Government Personnel Work Product APR 1992 252.204-7008 Compliance With Safeguarding Covered Defense Information

Controls

OCT 2016

252.204-7012 Safeguarding Covered Defense Information and Cyber Incident Reporting

OCT 2016

252.204-7015 Notice of Authorized Disclosure of Information for Litigation Support

MAY 2016

252.209-7004

252.211-7003

Subcontracting With Firms That Are Owned or Controlled By The Government of a Country that is a State Sponsor of Terrorism Item Unique Identification and Valuation

OCT 2015

MAR 2016

252.223-7008 Prohibition of Hexavalent Chromium JUN 2013 252.225-7012 Preference For Certain Domestic Commodities DEC 2017 252.232-7003 Electronic Submission of Payment Requests and Receiving

Reports

JUN 2012

252.232-7010 Levies on Contract Payments DEC 2006 252.243-7001 Pricing Of Contract Modifications DEC 1991 252.243-7002 Requests for Equitable Adjustment DEC 2012 252.244-7000 Subcontracts for Commercial Items JUN 2013 252.246-7000 Material Inspection And Receiving Report MAR 2008 252.251-7000 Ordering From Government Supply Sources AUG 2012

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT

52.203-2 CERTIFICATE OF INDEPENDENT PRICE DETERMINATION (APR 1985)

(a) The offeror certifies that --

(1) The prices in this offer have been arrived at independently, without, for the purpose of restricting competition, any consultation, communication, or agreement with any other offeror or competitor relating to –

(i) Those prices,

(ii) The intention to submit an offer, or

(iii) The methods of factors used to calculate the prices offered:

(2) The prices in this offer have not been and will not be knowingly disclosed by the offeror, directly or indirectly, to any other offeror or competitor before bid opening (in the case of a sealed bid solicitation) or contract award (in the case of a negotiated solicitation) unless otherwise required by law; and

(3) No attempt has been made or will be made by the offeror to induce any other concern to submit or not to submit an offer for the purpose of restricting competition.

(b) Each signature on the offer is considered to be a certification by the signatory that the signatory --

(1) Is the person in the offeror's organization responsible for determining the prices offered in this bid or proposal, and that the signatory has not participated and will not participate in any action contrary to subparagraphs (a)(1) through (a)(3) of this provision; or

(2) (i) Has been authorized, in writing, to act as agent for the following principals in certifying that those principals have not participated, and will not participate in any action contrary to subparagraphs (a)(1) through (a)(3) of this provison ______________________________________________________ (insert full name of person(s) in the offeror's organization responsible for determining the prices offered in this bid or proposal, and the title of his or her position in the offeror's organization);

(ii) As an authorized agent, does certify that the principals named in subdivision (b)(2)(i) above have not participated, and will not participate, in any action contrary to subparagraphs (a)(1) through (a)(3) above; and

(iii) As an agent, has not personally participated, and will not participate, in any action contrary to subparagraphs (a)(1) through (a)(3) of this provision.

(c) If the offeror deletes or modifies subparagraph (a)(2) of this provision, the offeror must furnish with its offer a signed statement setting forth in detail the circumstances of the disclosure.

(End of Provision)

52.209-5 CERTIFICATION REGARDING RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS (OCT 2015)

(a)(1) The Offeror certifies, to the best of its knowledge and belief, that-

(i) The Offeror and/or any of its Principals-

(A) Are ( ) are not ( ) presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, or declared ineligible for the award of contracts by any Federal agency;

(B) Have ( ) have not ( ), within a three-year period preceding this offer, been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against them for: commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal, State, or local) contract or subcontract; violation of Federal or State antitrust statutes relating to the submission of offers; or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, tax evasion, violating Federal criminal tax laws, or receiving stolen property (if offeror checks “have”, the offeror shall also see 52.209-7, if included in this solicitation); and

(C) Are ( ) are not ( ) presently indicted for, or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity with, commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph (a)(1)(i)(B) of this provision.;

and

(D) Have , have not , within a three-year period preceding this offer, been notified of any delinquent Federal taxes in an amount that exceeds $3,500 for which the liability remains unsatisfied.

(1) Federal taxes are considered delinquent if both of the following criteria apply:

(i) The tax liability is finally determined. The liability is finally determined if it has been assessed. A liability is not finally determined if there is a pending administrative or judicial challenge. In the case of a judicial challenge to the liability, the liability is not finally determined until all judicial appeal rights have been exhausted.

(ii) The taxpayer is delinquent in making payment. A taxpayer is delinquent if the taxpayer has failed to pay the tax liability when full payment was due and required. A taxpayer is not delinquent in cases where enforced collection action is precluded.

(2) Examples. (i) The taxpayer has received a statutory notice of deficiency, under I.R.C. Sec. 6212, which entitles the taxpayer to seek Tax Court review of a proposed tax deficiency. This is not a delinquent tax because it is not a final tax liability. Should the taxpayer seek Tax Court review, this will not be a final tax liability until the taxpayer has exercised all judicial appeal rights.

(ii) The IRS has filed a notice of Federal tax lien with respect to an assessed tax liability, and the taxpayer has been issued a notice under I.R.C. Sec. 6320 entitling the taxpayer to request a hearing with the IRS Office of Appeals contesting the lien filing, and to further appeal to the Tax Court if the IRS determines to sustain the lien filing. In the course of the hearing, the taxpayer is entitled to contest the underlying tax liability because the taxpayer has had no prior opportunity to contest the liability. This is not a delinquent tax because it is not a final tax liability. Should the taxpayer seek tax court review, this will not be a final tax liability until the taxpayer has exercised all judicial appeal rights.

(iii) The taxpayer has entered into an installment agreement pursuant to I.R.C. Sec. 6159. The taxpayer is making timely payments and is in full compliance with the agreement terms. The taxpayer is not delinquent because the taxpayer is not currently required to make full payment.

(iv) The taxpayer has filed for bankruptcy protection. The taxpayer is not delinquent because enforced collection action is stayed under 11 U.S.C. 362 (the Bankruptcy Code).

(ii) The Offeror has ( ) has not ( ), within a three-year period preceding this offer, had one or more contracts terminated for default by any Federal agency.

(2) Principal, for the purposes of this certification, means an officer, director, owner, partner, or a person having primary management or supervisory responsibilities within a business entity (e.g., general manager; plant manager;

head of a division or business segment; and similar positions).

(b) The Offeror shall provide immediate written notice to the Contracting Officer if, at any time prior to contract award, the Offeror learns that its certification was erroneous when submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances.

(c) A certification that any of the items in paragraph (a) of this provision exists will not necessarily result in withholding of an award under this solicitation. However, the certification will be considered in connection with a determination of the Offeror's responsibility. Failure of the Offeror to furnish a certification or provide such additional information as requested by the Contracting Officer may render the Offeror nonresponsible.

(d) Nothing contained in the foregoing shall be construed to require establishment of a system of records in order to render, in good faith, the certification required by paragraph (a) of this provision. The knowledge and information of an Offeror is not required to exceed that which is normally possessed by a prudent person in the ordinary course of business dealings.

(e) The certification in paragraph (a) of this provision is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when making award. If it is later determined that the Offeror knowingly rendered an erroneous certification, in addition to other remedies available to the Government, the Contracting Officer may terminate the contract resulting from this solicitation for default.

52.209-7 INFORMATION REGARDING RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS (JULY 2013)

(a) Definitions. As used in this provision--

Administrative proceeding means a non-judicial process that is adjudicatory in nature in order to make a determination of fault or liability (e.g., Securities and Exchange Commission Administrative Proceedings, Civilian Board of Contract Appeals Proceedings, and Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals Proceedings). This includes administrative proceedings at the Federal and State level but only in connection with performance of a Federal contract or grant. It does not include agency actions such as contract audits, site visits, corrective plans, or inspection of deliverables.

Federal contracts and grants with total value greater than $10,000,000 means--

(1) The total value of all current, active contracts and grants, including all priced options; and

(2) The total value of all current, active orders including all priced options under indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity, 8(a), or requirements contracts (including task and delivery and multiple-award Schedules).

Principal means an officer, director, owner, partner, or a person having primary management or supervisory responsibilities within a business entity (e.g., general manager; plant manager; head of a division or business segment; and similar positions).

(b) The offeror ( ) has ( ) does not have current active Federal contracts and grants with total value greater than $10,000,000.

(c) If the offeror checked “has” in paragraph (b) of this provision, the offeror represents, by submission of this offer, that the information it has entered in the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS) is current, accurate, and complete as of the date of submission of this offer with regard to the following information:

(1) Whether the offeror, and/or any of its principals, has or has not, within the last five years, in connection with the award to or performance by the offeror of a Federal contract or grant, been the subject of a proceeding, at the Federal or State level that resulted in any of the following dispositions:

(i) In a criminal proceeding, a conviction.

(ii) In a civil proceeding, a finding of fault and liability that results in the payment of a monetary fine, penalty, reimbursement, restitution, or damages of $5,000 or more.

(iii) In an administrative proceeding, a finding of fault and liability that results in--

(A) The payment of a monetary fine or penalty of $5,000 or more; or

(B) The payment of a reimbursement, restitution, or damages in excess of $100,000.

(iv) In a criminal, civil, or administrative proceeding, a disposition of the matter by consent or compromise with an acknowledgment of fault by the Contractor if the proceeding could have led to any of the outcomes specified in paragraphs (c)(1)(i), (c)(1)(ii), or (c)(1)(iii) of this provision.

(2) If the offeror has been involved in the last five years in any of the occurrences listed in (c)(1) of this provision, whether the offeror has provided the requested information with regard to each occurrence.

(d) The offeror shall post the information in paragraphs (c)(1)(i) through (c)(1)(iv) of this provision in FAPIIS as required through maintaining an active registration in the System for Award Management database via https://www.acquisition.gov (see 52.204-7).

52.209-11 REPRESENTATION BY CORPORATIONS REGARDING DELINQUENT TAX LIABILITY OR A

FELONY CONVICTION UNDER ANY FEDERAL LAW (FEB 2016)

(a) As required by sections 744 and 745 of Division E of the Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2015 (Pub. L. 113-235), and similar provisions, if contained in subsequent appropriations acts, the Government will not enter into a contract with any corporation that--

(1) Has any unpaid Federal tax liability that has been assessed, for which all judicial and administrative remedies have been exhausted or have lapsed, and that is not being paid in a timely manner pursuant to an agreement with the authority responsible for collecting the tax liability, where the awarding agency is aware of the unpaid tax liability, unless an agency has considered suspension or debarment of the corporation and made a determination that suspension or debarment is not necessary to protect the interests of the Government; or

(2) Was convicted of a felony criminal violation under any Federal law within the preceding 24 months, where the awarding agency is aware of the conviction, unless an agency has considered suspension or debarment of the corporation and made a determination that this action is not necessary to protect the interests of the Government.

(b) The Offeror represents that--

(1) It is [ ] is not [ ] a corporation that has any unpaid Federal tax liability that has been assessed, for which all judicial and administrative remedies have been exhausted or have lapsed, and that is not being paid in a timely manner pursuant to an agreement with the authority responsible for collecting the tax liability; and

(2) It is [ ] is not [ ] a corporation that was convicted of a felony criminal violation under a Federal law within the preceding 24 months.

52.211-6 BRAND NAME OR EQUAL (AUG 1999)

(a) If an item in this solicitation is identified as “brand name or equal,” the purchase description reflects the characteristics and level of quality that will satisfy the Government's needs. The salient physical, functional, or performance characteristics that “equal” products must meet are specified in the solicitation.

(b) To be considered for award, offers of “equal” products, including “equal” products of the brand name manufacturer, must--

(1) Meet the salient physical, functional, or performance characteristic specified in this solicitation;

(2) Clearly identify the item by--

(i) Brand name, if any; and

(ii) Make or model number;

(3) Include descriptive literature such as illustrations, drawings, or a clear reference to previously furnished descriptive data or information available to the Contracting Officer; and

(4) Clearly describe any modifications the offeror plans to make in a product to make it conform to the solicitation requirements. Mark any descriptive material to clearly show the modifications.

(c) The Contracting Officer will evaluate “equal” products on the basis of information furnished by the offeror or identified in the offer and reasonably available to the Contracting Officer. The Contracting Officer is not responsible for locating or obtaining any information not identified in the offer.

(d) Unless the offeror clearly indicates in its offer that the product being offered is an “equal” product, the offeror shall provide the brand name product referenced in the solicitation.

52.212-2 EVALUATION--COMMERCIAL ITEMS (OCT 2014)

(a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:

Factor 1: Corporate Experience Factor 2: Team Qualifications Factor 3: Master Schedule Factor 4: Commodity Specifications Factor 5: Past Performance Factor 6: Price

Factors 1 & 2 are of equal importance and considered the most important factors.

Factors 4, 5, & 6 are of equal importance and more important than Factor 3.

FACTOR 1: Corporate Experience

Submission Requirements: Page Limit – 5 Pages. Submit Project Information for three (3) projects/task orders completed within the last 5 years that are similar in scope to this requirement. Offerors shall not include a listing of projects. At a minimum, the following information shall be included on each project information sheet:

Customer Location General Scope Size Dollar Value Percent complete or date completed

Work that would be considered similar would include Initial outfitting, transition, and activation of Department of Defense Medical facilities.

Evaluation Criteria: Proposal will be evaluated to determine the extent to which it demonstrates the offeror has successfully completed projects of similar scope and complexity.

FACTOR 2: Team Qualifications

Submission Requirements: Page Limit – 5 Pages. Submit personnel experience information in accordance with SOW Section 3 for the proposed Project Manager, Transition Planner/Relocation Specialist, Medical Equipment Planner, and Interior Designer.

Offerors shall provide a staffing matrix which identifies all personnel on their team and the qualifications that they possess in order to satisfy the minimum requirements of Section VI in the Statement of Work.

At a minimum, the following information shall be included:

Qualifications Project location and general scope Size and dollar value Team member role and responsibilities Percent complete or date completed

Evaluation Criteria: Proposal will be evaluated to determine the relevant experience of the personnel offered.

FACTOR 3: Master Schedule

Submission Requirements: Page Limit – 5 pages. Submit an approach to completing the tasks outlined in the SOW.

Submit a master schedule of the tasks that needs to be completed to fulfill this requirement.

Offeror’s shall submit a sample IO Master Schedule, using the Statement of Work, focusing on the Offeror’s ability to schedule and coordinate critical aspects of the IO process.

In addition to the sample IO Master Schedule, Offeror may use additional space allowed in the page count to describe in detail their Master Schedule Approach.

Evaluation Criteria: Proposal will be evaluated to determine the extent to which the offeror understand the scope of this requirement. The proposal will also be evaluated to ensure all tasks outlined in the master schedule will meet the milestone dates outlined in the SOW.

FACTOR 4: Commodity Specifications

Submission Requirements: No page limit. Please submit cut sheets only for commodities in which you intend to deviate. The cut sheet must indicate the reason for deviation. For example if you intend to substitute a particular commodity for a different commodity because the original commodity specified is no longer available, the cut sheet you submit must indicate that reasoning. All cut sheets provided shall include equipment specifications.

Evaluation Criteria: The proposal will be evaluated to determine the extent to which the proposed commodities meets the criteria set forth in the SOW.

FACTOR 5: Past Performance

Submission Requirement: Page Limit – 12 Pages: Submit completed Past Performance Questionnaires from at least 3 customers demonstrating past performance completed or at least 50% complete within the last 3 years. Offerors may submit previously submitted Past Performance Questionnaires on projects completed or at least 50% complete within the last 3 years.

NAVFAC/USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ-0) CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)

1. Contractor Information

Firm Name: CAGE Code:

Address: DUNs Number:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:

2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain) Percent of project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):

3. Contract Information Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please specify):

Contract Title:

Contract Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Explain Differences:

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):

Explain Differences:

4. Project Description:

Complexity of Work High Med Routine How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)

CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)

5. Client Information Name:

Title:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

6. Describe the client’s role in the project:

7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):

8. Client’s Signature:

NOTE: NAVFAC/USACE REQUESTS THAT THE CLIENT COMPLETES THIS QUESTIONNAIRE

AND SUBMITS DIRECTLY BACK TO THE OFFEROR. THE OFFEROR WILL SUBMIT THE

COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO USACE WITH THEIR PROPOSAL, AND MAY DUPLICATE

THIS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FUTURE SUBMISSION ON USACE SOLICITATIONS. CLIENTS ARE

HIGHLY ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT QUESTIONNAIRES DIRECTLY TO THE OFFEROR.

HOWEVER, QUESTIONNAIRES MAY BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO USACE. PLEASE CONTACT

THE OFFEROR FOR USACE POC INFORMATION. THE GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT

TO VERIFY ANY AND ALL INFORMATION ON THIS FORM.

ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE

RATING DEFINITION NOTE

(E) Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.

An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

(VG) Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.

(S) Satisfactory Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.

(M) Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.

(U) Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner.