Amendment_0004.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

See Page 2

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

1 3

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 16-Mar-2018

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W9127S18R0006

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

17-Jan-2018

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

16-Mar-2018

CODE

CONTRACTING DIVISION

USACE, LITTLE ROCK (W9127S)

700 W. CAPITOL AVE, RM 7315

LITTLE ROCK AR 72201-3225

W9127S 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W9127S18R0006

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

The purpose of this amendment is to:

1. Extend the proposal due date until Thursday, March 29, 2018 at 10:00 AM.

2. Post revised answers to two previous ProjNet inquiries.

3. Post answers to additional questions.

4. Remove and Replace the Bid Schedule in its entirety.

5. Remove and Replace Section 00 22 13, Supplementary Instructions to Bidder, in its entirety.

(Changes in bold and italicized)

6. Remove and Replace Specification Section and Drawings, as follows:

BID SCHEDULE CHANGES TO W9127S-18-R-0006 AMENDMENT 0004

Changed CLIN 0007AG from man-hours to pounds.

OPTIONAL CLIN 0014 – changed to “flash gard adder”

SPECIFICATION CHANGES W9127S-18-R-0006 AMENDMENT 0004

SECTION 01 11 00 Page 1

h. Provide new feeders from the 480V Station Service Switchgear to each new Distribution Center.

Provide 1 spare feeder breaker (AM0004) in the station service switchgear and 2 spare feeder breakers in each MCC.

SECTION 01 22 00.00 10

1.2.6.1 Payment

Payment will be paid for the contract price per (AM004) pound. See Section 02 82 14.00 10 for Disposal Quantity Determination.

1.2.6.2 Unit of Measure

Unit of Measure: (AM004) pound.

1.2.12.2 Unit of Measure

Unit of Measure: Linear Foot.

(AM002)1.2.13 Motor Control Center (AM004) flash gard adder - CLIN 0014

SECTION 01 45 00.00 10 Page 4

(AM004) Identify as CQC System Manager an individual within the onsite work organization that is responsible for overall management of CQC and has the authority to act in all CQC matters for the Contractor. The CQC System Manager is required to be a graduate electrical engineer with a minimum of 10 years construction experience in power generation (at least 6 years of the 10 years in hydropower), or a graduate of construction management with a minimum of 20 years construction experience (at least 15 years of the 20 years in power generation and 10 years of the 20 years in hydropower), or a master electrician with a minimum of 20 years construction experience (at least 15 years of the 20 years in power generation and 10 years of the 20 years in hydropower). This CQC System Manager is on the site at all times during construction and is employed by the prime Contractor. The CQC System Manager shall be dedicated and cannot be the project superintendent. Identify in the plan an alternate to serve in the event of the CQC System Manager's absence. The requirements for the alternate are the same as the CQC System Manager.

DRAWING CHANGES W9127S-18-R-0006 AMENDMENT 0004

The following drawings were revised:

G-001.2 M-401.1 E-201.1 E-402.1 E-601.1 E-602.1 E-603.2 E-604.2 E-605.1 E-606.1 E-607.2 E.612.1 E-613.1 E-614.1 E-615.1

(End of Summary of Changes)

ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS/ANSWERS

1. Drawing E‐603.1, One Line Changes, Unit 1 MCC (NEW) shows a 50A breaker feeding a 75kVA transformer. This circuit is not shown on the panel schedule on E‐607. Is this circuit in the contract scope of work? Yes.

2. Drawing E‐603.1, One Line Changes, Unit 1 MCC (NEW) shows a 50A breaker feeding a 75kVA transformer. Drawing E‐614 shows a circuit feeding a 15kVA transformer. Is this the same circuit? No. Which is correct? 50 amp breaker feeding a 25 kVA dry type transformer that is to be located in the Sump Pump and Unit MCCs. Please note that EasyPower was used to create the one line diagrams. EasyPower is a three phase program and represents single phase transformers as triple the rating. There is a general note that covers this issue.

3. Drawing E‐603.1, One Line Changes, Unit 1 MCC (NEW) shows a 50A breaker feeding a 75kVA transformer. Is the feeder breaker size adequate? Yes. Please see #2 above.

4. Drawing E‐603.1, One Line Changes, Unit 1 MCC (NEW) shows a 50A breaker feeding a 75kVA transformer. This circuit is not shown on the cable schedule, Drawing E‐605. Is this circuit in the contract scope of work? Yes. This was not shown in the conduit and cable schedule as it is internal to the MCC. Size will be indicated on the one line diagram (1‐1/C‐4 AWG).

5. Drawing E‐603.1, One Line Changes, Unit 1 MCC (NEW) shows two 50A breakers feeding two

10HP 125# air compressors. These circuit are not shown on the panel schedule on E‐607.1.

These circuits are not shown on new one line drawings for Unit 1 MCC on E‐614 and E‐615. Are these circuits in the contract scope of work? No.

6. Drawing E‐604.1, One Line Changes, Unit 1 MCC (NEW) shows a breaker feeding a 480V welding receptacle. It lists 60A and 50A, which should it be? 60 amp. The drawing will be corrected by amendment.

7. Drawing E‐604.1, One Line Changes, Unit 1 MCC (NEW) shows one breaker feeding a 480V welding receptacle. The panel schedule on Drawing E‐607.1 shows two circuits feeding 60A receptacles. Which is correct? Drawing E‐607.1 is correct. Drawing E‐604.1 will be corrected by amendment.

8. Drawing E‐604.1, One Line Changes, Unit 1 MCC (NEW) shows one breaker feeding a 480V welding receptacle. This circuit is not shown on new one line drawings for Unit 1 MCC on E‐614 and E‐615. Is this circuit in the contract scope of work? Yes. Please see #7 above.

9. Drawings E‐603.1 and E‐604.1, One Line Changes, Unit 1 MCC (NEW) shows a total of 4 breakers.

The panel schedule on drawing E‐607.1 shows a total of 8 breakers. Which is correct? Neither.

9 breakers will be required on Unit 1 MCC. E‐603.1, E‐604.1, and E‐607.1 will be corrected by

10. Drawings E‐603.1 and E‐604.1, One Line Changes, Unit 1 MCC (NEW) shows a total of 4 breakers.

Drawings E‐614 and E‐615, New One Line, Unit 1 MCC shows a total of 8 breakers. Which is correct? Please see #9 above.

11. Drawing E‐603.1, One Line Changes, Unit 1 MCC (NEW) shows a 50A breaker feeding a 75kVA transformer, which feeds a 100A panel. Both the transformer and panel are shown inside the outline of the MCC as if they are to be integrated in the MCC. Drawing E‐614, New One Line, Unit 1 MCC shows a 15kVA transformer internal to the MCC and the panel external. Which is correct? This will be corrected. The 25 kVA dry type and 100 amp panel needs to be integrated into the MCC Unit 1. The dry type transformer for vent fan #5 will be done away with and in its place a pull box. There is a combo disconnect shown on E‐402 for vent fan #5.

Vent fan #5 will be moved to the 100 amp panel.

12. Drawing E‐604.1, One Line Changes, Unit 2 MCC (NEW) shows a 50A breaker feeding a 75kVA transformer. This circuit is not shown on the panel schedule on E‐607. Is this circuit in the

13. Drawing E‐604.1, One Line Changes, Unit 2 MCC (NEW) shows a 50A breaker feeding a 75kVA transformer. Drawing E‐615 shows a circuit feeding a 15kVA transformer. Is this the same circuit? Yes. Which is correct? E‐615.1 will be corrected by amendment to show as 75 kVA.

EasyPower is a three phase program and represents single phase transformers as triple the rating. There will be a general note added to cover this issue.

14. Drawing E‐604.1, One Line Changes, Unit 2 MCC (NEW) shows a 50A breaker feeding a 75kVA transformer. Is the feeder breaker size adequate? Yes. Please see #13 above.

15. Drawing E‐604.1, One Line Changes, Unit 2 MCC (NEW) shows a 50A breaker feeding a 75kVA transformer. This circuit is not shown on the cable schedule, Drawing E‐605. Is this circuit in the

16. Drawing E‐604.1, One Line Changes, Unit 2 MCC (NEW) shows a 2 50A breakers feeding two

10HP 125# air compressors. These circuit are not shown on the panel schedule on E‐607.1.

These circuits are not shown on new one line drawings for Unit 2 MCC E‐615. Are these circuits in the contract scope of work? Yes. E‐607.1 and E‐615.1 will be corrected by amendment.

17. Drawing E‐604.1, One Line Changes, Unit 2 MCC (NEW) shows one breaker feeding a 480V welding receptacle. The panel schedule on Drawing E‐607.1 shows two circuits feeding 60A receptacles. Which is correct? Drawing E‐607.1 is correct. Drawing E‐604.1 will be corrected

18. Drawing E‐604.1, One Line Changes, Unit 2 MCC (NEW) shows one breaker feeding a 480V welding receptacle. This circuit is not shown on new one line drawing for Unit 2 MCC on E‐615.

Is this circuit in the contract scope of work? Yes. Drawing E‐615.1 will be corrected to show two new welding outlet circuits.

19. Drawing E‐604.1, One Line Changes, Unit 2 MCC (NEW) shows a total of 6 breakers. The panel schedule on drawing E‐607.1 shows a total of 8 breakers. Which is correct? Neither. 9 breakers will be required on Unit 2 MCC. E‐604.1 and E‐607.1 will be corrected by amendment.

20. Drawing E‐604.1, One Line Changes, Unit 2 MCC (NEW) and Drawing E‐615, New One Line, Unit

2 MCC show different loads. Which is correct? E‐604.1 and E‐615 will be corrected by

21. Drawing E‐604.1, One Line Changes, Unit 2 MCC (NEW) shows a 50A breaker feeding a 75kVA transformer, which feeds a 100A panel. Both the transformer and panel are shown inside the outline of the MCC as if they are to be integrated in the MCC. Drawing E‐615, New One Line, Unit 2 MCC shows a 15kVA transformer internal to the MCC and the panel external. Which size is correct? E‐615 will be corrected by amendment. The dry type transformer and panel are to be shown integrated into the MCC. Transformer size will be shown as 75 kVA but note

EasyPower is a three phase program and represents single phase transformers as triple the rating.

22. Drawing E‐604.1, One Line Changes, Unit 2 MCC (NEW) shows a 60A breaker feeding a welding receptacle. The receptacle is shown inside the MCC outline as if it is to be integrated in the

MCC. Is the receptacle internal or external? External. Drawing E‐604.1 will be corrected by

23. Drawing E‐604.1, One Line Changes, Unit 2 MCC (NEW) shows a 15A breaker feeding HP OIL 2.

Drawing E‐615, New One Line, Unit 2 MCC does not include this 15A breaker. Which is correct?

E‐615 labels the load as FARVAL2.

24. Drawing E‐604.1, One Line Changes, Unit 2 MCC (NEW) shows a 15A breaker feeding HP OIL 2.

Drawing E‐607.1, Panel Schedules, Unit 2 MCC contains two circuits for U2 Gov Oil Pumps.

Which is correct? Drawings E‐604.1 and E‐607.1 will be corrected by amendment. HP OIL 2 is

Farval and different from GOVA‐U2 and GOVB‐U2. HP OIL2 Farval is ½ hp, GOVA‐U2 and

GOVB‐U2 are 20 hp.

25. Drawing E‐604.1, One Line Changes, SUMP PUMP MCC (NEW) shows a 50A breaker feeding a

75kVA transformer. Drawing E‐615 shows a 100A circuit feeding a 15kVA transformer. Which size is correct? Drawing E‐615 will be corrected to show 75kVA transformer.

26. Drawing E‐604.1, One Line Changes, SUMP PUMP MCC (NEW) shows a 50A breaker feeding a

75kVA transformer. Is the feeder breaker size adequate? Yes. Transformer size will be shown as 75 kVA but note EasyPower is a three phase program and represents single phase transformers as triple the rating.

27. Drawing E‐604.1, One Line Changes, SUMP PUMP MCC (NEW) shows two breakers feeding 480V welding receptacles. It lists 60A and 50A, Which size is correct? 60amp. E‐604.1 will be corrected to remove the West E 100/50 which was inadvertently copied in from the old one line.

28. Drawing E‐604.1, One Line Changes, SUMP PUMP (NEW) shows a breaker feeding a motor named DAM AND SS COMP. This circuit is not shown on the panel schedule on E‐607.1. Is this circuit in the contract scope of work? Yes. E‐607.1 will be corrected by amendment.

29. Drawing E‐604.1, One Line Changes, SUMP PUMP (NEW) shows a breaker feeding a motor named OIL SKIMMER. This circuit is not shown on the panel schedule on E‐607.1. Is this circuit in the contract scope of work? The space and “provisions for” is in the contract but the outfitting of the buckets, conduit and wire to the load is by others, not in contract. E‐604.1 will be corrected by amendment.

30. Drawing E‐604.1, One Line Changes, SUMP PUMP MCC (NEW) shows two breakers feeding 480V welding receptacles. It lists them as 60A and 50A. Drawing E‐615, New One Line, SUMP PUMP shows two receptacles feed by 50A breakers. What size breakers are needed for the receptacles? 60 amp.

31. Drawing E603.1, STATION SERVICE SWITCHGEAR, shows the LTG breaker to be 210A. Drawing E

607.1 show breaker 52LTG to be 400A. Which is correct? 210 amps. E‐607.1 will be corrected

32. Drawing E‐607.1, PANEL SCHEDULE, MCC 1 loads 1 through 6 are not shown on Drawings E‐

603.1 and E‐604.1, One Line Changes, Unit 1 MCC (NEW). Are these circuits in the contract scope of work? Yes.

33. Drawing E‐607.1, PANEL SCHEDULE, MCC 2 loads 1 through 6 are not shown on Drawing E‐

604.1, One Line Changes, Unit 2 MCC (NEW). Are these circuits in the contract scope of work?

Yes.

34. Drawing E‐607.1, PANEL SCHEDULE, MCC 1 shows one circuit for U1 Generator Heaters.

Drawings E‐614 and E‐615, New One Line, Unit 1 MCC shows two 50A circuits for the heaters.

Which is correct? One circuit. The two drawings depict the same load.

35. Drawing E‐614, New One Line, Unit 1 MCC shows a breaker feeding an internal transformer.

This circuit is not shown on Drawing E‐607.1, PANEL SCHEDULE, MCC 1. Which is correct? E‐

614. E‐607.1 will be corrected by amendment.

36. Drawing E‐607.1, PANEL SCHEDULE, MCC 1 shows two circuits for 60A receptacles. Drawings E‐

614 and E‐615, New One Line, Unit 1 MCC do not show these circuits. Which is correct? E‐607.1

E614 and E‐615 will be corrected by amendment.

37. Drawing E‐615, New One Line, Unit 2 MCC shows a breaker feeding an internal transformer.

This circuit is not shown on Drawing E‐607.1, PANEL SCHEDULE, MCC 1. Which is correct? Panel and transformer should be integrated into the MCC. E‐607.1 will be corrected by amendment.

38. Drawing E‐607.1, PANEL SCHEDULE, MCC 2 shows two circuits for 60A receptacles. Drawing E‐

615, New One Line, Unit 2 MCC does not show these circuits. Which is correct? E‐607.1. E‐615 will be corrected by amendment.

39. Drawing E‐615, New One Line, Sump Pump MCC shows a breaker feeding Dam + SS Compr. This circuit is not shown on Drawing E‐607.1, PANEL SCHEDULE, Sump MCC. Which is correct? E‐

615. Drawing E‐607.1 will be corrected by amendment.

40. Drawing E‐607.1, PANEL SCHEDULE, MCC 2 shows 8 total circuits. Drawing E‐615, New One Line, Unit 2 MCC show 6 total circuits. Which is correct? Neither. 9 total circuits required.

Drawings E‐607.1 and E‐615 will be corrected by amendment.

41. Drawings E‐612 through E‐615, ONE LINE DIAGRAMS (NEW), in the general notes, state that these drawings are provided for information purposes only. Are these for reference or do they represent new work? INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY will be struck from the note. These drawings do contain work.

42. Amendment 2 Section 01 11 00 Page 3 added the requirement to reconnect the feeder from the erection bay bi‐fold doors to the new panel 396P3. Which drawing shows where the bi‐fold doors currently fed from? Which drawing shows if existing raceway and cable can be reused or will new raceway and cable be required? The bi‐fold doors are currently fed from the existing panel that will be replaced by 396P3. Only the feed is not in accordance with the National

Electrical Code in that there is not overcurrent protective device at the connection in the machine shop. It is required in the contract to correct this issue by connecting to a branch circuit breaker of the new panel.

43. Drawing E‐601, ONE LINE DIAGRAM (CHANGES), shows circuits for sump pumps 1 and 2 to be moved to the SUMP MCC (NEW) on drawing E‐604 ONE LINE DIAGRAM (CHANGES). Which drawings show existing circuits for sump pumps 3 and 4, and where they are located? Sump pumps 3 and 4 motor, wire and conduit is work by others, not in contract. Horsepower and breaker sizes will be shown on this contract by amendment to E‐604.1.

44. Drawing E‐615, ONE LINE DIAGRAM (NEW), sump pump MCC has a feeder for an actuator eductor. Which drawing shows where the actuator eductor physically located? See #29 above.

45. Drawing E‐615, ONE LINE DIAGRAM (NEW), sump pump MCC has a feeder for Hoist. Which drawing shows where the hoist is physically located? See #29 above.

46. Drawing E‐615, ONE LINE DIAGRAM (NEW), sump pump MCC has a feeder for a transformer and panel SPMCC. Which drawing shows where is SPMCC panel physically located? The sump pump

MCC dry type and panel are to be integrated into the MCC.

47. Drawing E‐607.1, PANEL SCHEDULES, shows the circuits for the #300 Governor Air Compressors fed from MCC1 and MCC2 to be #8. Drawings E‐614 and E‐615 show these circuits to be #10.

Which is correct? Will be corrected via amendment to #8.

48. Drawing E‐607.1, PANEL SCHEDULES, shows the circuits for the heaters fed from MCC1 and

MCC2 to be #12. Drawings E‐614 and E‐615 show these circuits to be #10. Which is correct?

Neither. The drawings will be corrected via amendment to show #8.

49. Drawing E‐607.1, PANEL SCHEDULES, shows the circuit for the oil purification room panel to be

#1. Drawing E‐615 shows this circuit to be #4/0. Which is correct? E‐615 (#4/0). Will be changing conduit to 2‐1/2” via amendment.

50. Drawing E‐607.1, PANEL SCHEDULES, shows the circuit for dry type transformer to be #4.

Drawing E‐615 shows this circuit to be #2. Which is correct? #4 is correct. I didn’t see the #2 on

E‐615.

51. Drawing E606, PANEL SCHDULES, shows cable IP27 for the sewage room to be #6. Drawing E‐

601, ONE LINE DIAGRAM (CHANGES) and drawing E‐612, ONE LINE DIAGRAM (NEW) show this circuit to be #12. Which is correct? #6.

52. Drawing E606, PANEL SCHDULES, shows cable IP23 for 480V plug tailrace to be #6. Drawing E‐ 601, ONE LINE DIAGRAM (CHANGES) shows this circuit to be #10. Which is correct? #6.

53. Drawing E606, PANEL SCHDULES, shows cable IP75 for the cable tunnel vent fan to be #2.

Drawing E‐601, ONE LINE DIAGRAM (CHANGES) and drawing E‐612, ONE LINE DIAGRAM (NEW) show this circuit to be #8. Which is correct? #2.

54. Drawing E606, PANEL SCHDULES, shows cable IP75 for the cable tunnel vent fan to be #2 installed in a ¾” and 1” conduit. This is a NEC Code violation, and physically impossible.

Currently 2#2 no ground. Replace with 2#2 + GRD. Most of this cable is in cable tray.

55. Drawing E606, PANEL SCHEDULES, shows cable IP37 for the water heaters to be #6. Drawing E‐ 602, ONE LINE DIAGRAM (CHANGES) and drawing E‐613, ONE LINE DIAGRAM (NEW) show this circuit to be #10. Which is correct? #6. Drawing E‐613 will be changed from #10 to #6.

56. Drawing E606, PANEL SCHEDULES, shows cable IP53 to be #1/0 and #4/0. Drawing E‐602, ONE LINE DIAGRAM (CHANGES) and drawing E‐613, ONE LINE DIAGRAM (NEW) show this circuit to be #4/0. Which is correct? Assume #4/0 for bidding purposes.

57. Drawing E606, PANEL SCHEDULES, shows cable IP53 to be #1/0 and #4/0 installed in ¾” and 1” conduit. This is a NEC Code violation, and physically impossible. Drawing will be changed to 2” via amendment.

58. Drawing E606, PANEL SCHEDULES, shows cable IP59 to be #1/0 installed in a 1” conduit. This is a NEC Code violation, and physically impossible. Drawing will be changed to 2” via amendment.

59. Specification section 01 11 00 “Summary of Work” paragraph 1.1.1.l. requires the contractor to provide a 15kV cable termination cabinet. Drawing E‐201 has a detail for a 15kV termination cabinet. The drawing states that the detail is for information only and there is no specific specification for the cabinet. First sentence will be struck from the drawing via amendment.

The drawing seems to indicate the termination cabinet contains bus. There are no technical specifications for this equipment. Is rigid bus required for this splice cabinet? A rigid main bus is required for this splice cabinet.

Motor Control Center and Switchgear Replacement Norfork Powerhouse Norfork Lake, White River Basin Baxter County, Arkansas

SECTION B

BIDDING SCHEDULE

(To be attached to SF 1442)

SOLICITATION NUMBER W9127S-18-R-0006

Line Item No.

Description Estimated Quantity

Unit Measure

Unit Price Amount

BASE BID

0001 Motor Control Center Sump Pump 1 Job XXX $__________

0002 Motor Control Center Unit 1 1 Job XXX $__________

0003 Motor Control Center Unit 2 1 Job XXX $__________

0004 Station Service Switchgear 1 Job XXX $__________

0005 Generator Connections 1 Job XXX $__________

Electrical, Controls, Demolition and Chain Link Gates

1 Job XXX $__________

0007 Asbestos Abatement Work X XXX XXX XXX

0007AA

Submittal Preparation for Asbestos Abatement Work

1 Job XXX $__________

0007AB Sampling: Mobilization & Demobilization for Asbestos Bulk Sampling

2 Each $__________ $__________

0007AC Sampling: Collecting and Analyzing Asbestos Bulk Samples

30 Each $__________ $__________

0007AD Mobilization & Demobilization for Asbestos Abatement

3 Each $__________ $__________

0007AE Abatement: wiring (AM002)240 (AM002)mn-hr $__________ $__________

0007AF Disposal: Transportation of Asbestos-Containing Materials, per trip

1 Each $__________ $__________

0007AG Disposal: Asbestos-Containing Materials (AM002)80 (AM004) lbs $__________ $__________

MISCELLANEOUS BID CLIN's (MBC)

0008 Electrical Hire 10 Est Man Hrs $__________ $__________

0009 Skilled Craftsman Hire 40 Est Man Hrs $__________ $__________

0010 Welding Services Hire 15 Est Man Hrs $__________ $__________

Transportation, Services, Equipment Rental, and

Parts and Materials Not to Exceed

Each $1 $20,000

TOTAL BASE BID $__________

OPTIONS

0012 Inspect Embedded Conduit 6 Est Mach Hrs $__________ $__________

0013 Hydro Clean 100 Est LF $__________ $__________

(AM002)

Motor Control Center (AM004) flash gard adder 1 Job XXX

TOTAL BASE BID PLUS OPTIONS $___________

The duration of the base bid is 365 days. If Optional CLIN item 0013 is awarded, then 30 days will be added to the contract.

Section 00 22 13 – Supplementary Instructions to Bidders

PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS AND INSTRUCTIONS

a. REQUIREMENT FOR SEPARATE PRICE AND NON-PRICE FACTOR PROPOSALS.

(1) Each Offeror must submit both a Price Proposal and a Non Price Factor Proposal. The Price Proposal and the Non Price Factor Proposal must be submitted as separate volumes. Ensure that the outside of each separate volume is clearly marked to indicate its contents; and the identity of the Offeror.

Additionally, clearly identify the “original” cost/price proposal and the “original” technical proposal on the outside cover.

(2) Both the Price Proposal and the Non-Price Factor Proposal must be received by the closing date and time set for receipt of proposals.

(3) No dollar amounts from the Price Proposal are to be included in the Non Price Factor Proposal.

(4) All information intended to be evaluated as part of the Technical Proposal must be submitted as part of the Technical Proposal. Do not merely cross-reference similar material in the Price Proposal, or vice versa. Also, do not include links to websites in lieu of incorporating information into the proposal.

(5) Do not include exceptions to the terms and conditions of the solicitation in either the technical or price proposal. Should the offer include any standard company terms and conditions that conflict with the terms and conditions of the solicitation, the offer may be determined "unacceptable" and thus ineligible for award. Should the Offeror have any questions related to specific terms and conditions, these shall be resolved prior to submission of the offer. Notwithstanding the above, the Offeror must clearly describe in the Proposal Cover Sheet submitted with the Price Proposal any exceptions to the contractual and/or technical terms and conditions of the solicitation contained in the offer.

b. DISCUSSIONS. The Government does not intend to enter into discussions with offerors prior to determining those offers are within the competitive range, in accordance with FAR 52.215-1, Instructions to Offerors—Competitive Acquisitions.

c. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS.

(1) Submit only the hard-copy paper documents and the electronic files specifically authorized and/or required elsewhere in this section. Do not submit excess information, to include audio-visual materials, electronic media, etc.

(2) Use only 8 ½ by 11 inch paper for hard copy submissions, unless another paper size is specifically authorized elsewhere in this section for a particular submission. Do not use fold-outs (e.g., 11” x 14” or 11” x 17” sheets) unless specifically authorized in this section for a particular submission. Do not use a font size smaller than 12, an unusual font style such as script, or condensed print for any submission. All page margins must be at least 1 inch wide, but may include headers and footers.

(3) The preferred method for assembling your proposals is to use three-ring binders; however, the use of pressboard or other report covers with compression or other type fasteners is acceptable. Do not use spring clamps or exceed the recommended capacity of the fastener or binder. Do not use plastic multi-hole/spiral binding systems, heat binding systems, or other systems which do not facilitate the ready insertion of additional pages.

(4) “Confidential” projects cannot be submitted to demonstrate capability unless all of the information required for evaluation as specified herein can be provided to the Government as part of the Offeror’s technical proposal. Offerors that include in their proposals information that they do not want disclosed to the public for any purpose, or used by the Government except for evaluation purposes, must be clearly marked in accordance with the instructions at FAR 52.215-1, “Instructions to Offerors— Competitive Acquisition”, paragraph (e), “Restriction on disclosure and use of data”.

(5) In the case of an Offeror that is part of a large, multi-segmented business concern, provide information directly pertaining to the specific segment of the business concern (i.e., the division, group, unit, etc.) that will perform work under the prospective contract.

(6) For submissions with page limitations, the pages will be counted as follows: One side of the paper is one page; information on both the back and front of one sheet of paper will be counted as two pages. Where authorized, fold-out pages (11" x 14" or 11" x 17") will count as one page. Pages furnished for organizational purposes only, such as a “Table of Contents” or divider tabs, are not included in the page limitation.

d. SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE PRICE PROPOSAL

(1) Number of Sets of the Price Proposal. Submit the ORIGINAL and ONE additional hard copy sets of the Price Proposal.

(2) Size Restrictions and Page Limits. Use only 8 ½” x 11” pages. There are no page limits set for the price proposal. However, limit your response to information required by this solicitation. Excess information will not be considered in the Government’s evaluation.

(3) Format and Contents of the Price Proposal and List of Tabs. The Price Proposal shall be appropriately labeled as such and shall be organized as indicated in the following chart. Note: If the Offeror is not required to submit any information under a listed Tab in accordance with the instructions below, that tab can be omitted. However, do not renumber the subsequent tabs.

TAB

CONTENTS OF THE PRICE PROPOSAL

#1

The Proposal Cover Sheet

#2

The SF1442 and Acknowledgement of Amendments

#3

Section 001100, Pricing Schedule

#4

Representations, Certifications, and Other Statements of Offerors (if the offeror does not have electronic certifications in SAM.gov)

#5

JV Agreement, if applicable.

#6

Pre-Award Survey

#7

Bid Guarantee (Bid Bond)

(3) Detailed Submission Instructions for the Price Proposal

TAB 1: The proposal cover sheet is required by FAR 52.215-1(c) (2) (i)-(v) and must be submitted by all offerors. This provision, titled “Instructions to Offerors—Competitive Acquisition,” and the format for the proposal cover sheet as shown here:

TAB 2: The SF 1442, Solicitation, Offer, and Award is to be completed by all Offerors and duly executed with an original signature by an official authorized to bind the company in accordance with FAR 4.102. All amendments must be acknowledged by all Offerors in accordance with the instructions on the Standard Form 30, Amendment of Solicitation.

TAB 3: Section 001100, Pricing Schedule is to be completed in its entirety by all Offerors.

See Section 001100 with attached notes, for further instructions.

TAB 4: All Offerors must have electronically completed the annual representations and certifications on the System for Award Management (SAM.gov) website or respond with the completed FAR Clause 52.204.8, Annual Representations and Certifications, found in the solicitation. The offerors are responsible for ensuring that these on-line Representations and Certifications are updated as necessary to reflect changes, but at least annually to ensure that they are kept current, accurate and complete. If the offeror is a Joint Venture, all participants must separately complete both the SAM.gov Representations and Certifications.

TAB 5: If the Offeror is a Joint Venture (JV), include a copy of the JV Agreement. If a

JV Agreement has not yet been finalized/approved, indicate its status. JV Agreements must clearly indicate the percentages of the JV participants, in particular the percent of the controlling party, and a clear delineation of responsibilities and authorities between the JV parties.

TAB 6: The Pre-Award Survey (found on the following pages) must be completed by all offerors and submitted as part of their price proposal. This document will be used by the Contracting Officer for the Contracting Officer’s Determination of Responsibility done prior to contract award in accordance with FAR Part 9.

TAB 7: Offer Guarantee must be provided in accordance with FAR 52.228-1.

PROPOSAL COVER SHEET

1. Solicitation Number:

2. The name, address, and telephone and facsimile numbers of the Offeror (and electronic address if available):

3. A statement specifying the extent of agreement with all terms, conditions, and provisions included in the solicitation and agreement to furnish any or all items upon which prices are offered at the price set opposite each item. Statement to include any exceptions in technical or cost/price proposal or exceptions inherent in Offeror’s standard terms and conditions.

4. Names, titles, and telephone and facsimile numbers (and electronic addresses if available) of persons authorized to negotiate on the Offeror’s behalf with the Government in connection with this solicitation:

5. Name, title, and signature of person authorized to sign the proposal. Proposals signed by an agent shall be accompanied by evidence of that agent’s authority, unless that evidence has been previously furnished to the issuing office.

CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR EXPERIENCE DATA

PRE-AWARD SURVEY INFORMATION

DATE:

Firm Name and Telephone Number Main Office Address (Street, City, and State)

Branch Offices Services Rendered Construction Design Consultant

Organization Individual

Joint Venture Partnership

Corporation

Date Organized Date Incorporated:

State:

Names of Officers and Other Key Personnel

I - PRESENT PAYROLL PERSONNEL (List Number of Each Category Below) Partners:

Officers:

Other Key:

Remainder: Subtotal Permanent: Maximum Personnel at Any Time: Date: Total:

II—EQUIPMENT OWNED III----FINANCIAL DATA AS OF

(DATE): Present Value ($) Current Assets:

Acquisition Cost ($) Current Liabilities:

Net Worth:

IV----TOTAL VALUE OF CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION

WORK IN PAST 5 YRS EXCLUSIVE OF JOINT VENTURE

(LIST MOST RECENT FIRST)

V----LARGEST JOB EVER

CONTRACTED

(If Other Than in Past Five Years)

$ LARGEST JOB IN PAST 5 YRS Contract Amount:

Date:$ Contract Amount:

$ Date:

Description:

Owner:

Description:

Owner:

Avg. Annual Income

VI----TYPE OF WORK IN WHICH FIRM SPECIALIZES

NAME AND POSITION/TITLE OF PERSON SIGNING SIGNATURE

NOTE: Use reverse side for explanations or detailed description of item(s) reported above.

SCHEDULE A

EXISTING COMMITMENTS

Contract Number and Total Value

Description of the Work

Project Owner*

Performance Period

% of work subcontracted

* PLEASE PROVIDE NAME OF ORGANIZATION, POINT OF CONTACT, AND TELEPHONE NUMBER

FOR CONTACT

SCHEDULE B

EXPERIENCE

DATA

List below the principal projects the firm has completed within the past 5 years.

Contract Number and Total Value

Description of the Work

Contact Person for the project and phone number

% of work subcontracted

SCHEDULE C

EQUIPMENT AND PERSONNEL

Provide a detailed statement below as to the availability of specific plant/personnel/equipment needed in order to perform the work in accordance with the contract and schedule requirements of this Request for Proposal and resulting project. Include names of personnel and types of equipment or equipment vendors and availability of each to provide equipment in a timely manner.

e. SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE NON-PRICE FACTOR PROPOSAL

(1) Number of Sets of the Non-Price Factor Proposal. Submit FOUR (4) Hard Copies and

FOUR 4 CD-ROM Copies of the written Technical Proposal, with each set separately packaged.

(2) Format and Contents of the Technical Proposal and List of Tabs. The original and all copies of the technical proposal will be appropriately labeled as such. Each set shall be organized using the tabs specified in the following chart.

FACTOR

CONTENTS OF THE NON-PRICE FACTOR PROPOSAL

Factor 1

TECHNICAL

Sub Factor 1.1

EXPERIENCE

Sub Factor 1.2

PERSONNEL

Factor 2

PAST PERFORMANCE

(3) Page Limitations. See paragraphs c.(2) and c.(6) above for format and page count instructions. The following page limitations are established for each factor described above:

Sub Factor 1.1, Experience – Limited to 10 pages (a maximum of 5 forms) Sub Factor 1.2, Personnel – Limited to 1 page for each resume provided Factor 2, Past Performance – No page limitation

Tables of content, proposal cover letters, and tabs between proposal information do not count toward any page limitations in the proposal.

(4) Detailed Submission Requirements for the Technical Proposal. The following is a detailed description of the information to be submitted under each TAB.

(i) FACTOR 1: SUB FACTOR 1.1 - EXPERIENCE: Demonstrate the experience of the Offeror and/or proposed team, including sub-contractors, on projects same/similar to that described in the solicitation for same/similar services.

1. The Offeror shall complete a minimum of three (3), but no more than five (5), “Experience Information” forms, attached at the end of this section, in response to this factor. All blocks must be filled in and all data should be accurate, current, and complete.

2. All projects submitted must have been underway or completed within the last 5 years.

3. At least two (2) of the projects provided must be valued over $1,000,000.

The work that would be same/similar would include motor control and switchgear replacement in a comparable facility demonstrating experience in shutdown/temporary power/etc. in a power generating plant which includes splicing 15kV voltage, or greater, cable. Submit medium voltage cable splice certification.

(SEE EXPERIENCE INFORMATION FORM NEXT PAGE)

EXPERIENCE INFORMATION

(To be completed by Contractor)

1. Contractor:

Name:

Address:

2. Contract /Task Order(TO) /Purchase Order (PO) Number:

3. Contract/TO/PO Dollar Value:

4. Contract/TO /PO Status: Active Complete

Completion Date (w/ extensions):

5. Project Title:

Location:

6. Project Description-- to include the role of the contractor on the project and specific responsibilities of the contractor in performance of the effort:

7. Project Owner or Project Manager for the Client - provide:

Name:

Address:

Telephone Number and E-mail:

(ii) FACTOR 1: SUB FACTOR 1.2 - PERSONNEL: The Offeror must provide resumes for the following key personnel: Project Manager, Safety Officer, Quality Control Manager and Site Superintendent. One of the key personnel listed must possess a medium voltage cable splicer certificate.

Resumes shall be limited to one (1) page per person and include the following information as a minimum:

Name and title Project Assignment Name of firm with which associated Years of experience with this firm and with other firms Education degree(s), year, specialization, if applicable Active professional registrations, year first registered, if applicable Other experience and qualifications relevant to same/similar work applicable to position The Quality Control Manager and Site Superintendent shall have experience and qualifications relevant to same/similar work required under this contract. Either the Quality Control Manager or Site Superintendent must be able to meet Security Level Two Requirements in accordance with Solicitation Section 00 73 00, Supplementary Conditions.

Experience considered same/similar would include scope such as: The work that would be same/similar would include motor control and switchgear replacement in a comparable facility demonstrating experience in shutdown/temporary power/etc. in a power generating plant which includes splicing 15kV voltage, or greater, cable. Submit medium voltage cable splice certification.

(iii) FACTOR 2: PAST PERFORMANCE: No submission is required for Factor 2, Past Performance. However, Offerors should request that customers identified in Sub- Factor 1.1 complete the questionnaire on the next page. Offerors should submit the completed questionnaires with their proposals. The Government will query the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (to include ACASS, CCASS, and CPARS) to validate past performance ratings on Department of Defense contracts and any other past performance information the Government deems necessary to evaluate a contractor’s past performance.

Firms without a history of past performance will be given an “Acceptable” rating.

The Government may contact references provided as part of Sub-Factor 1.1 – Experience, for information regarding the Offeror’s past performance on the project and for the purposes of assessing and verifying the scope of the work performed. Offerors should provide accurate, current, and complete contact information for references provided in the project descriptions. In addition, Past Performance information may be obtained from any other sources available to the Government to include, but not limited to PPIRS, or other databases; interviews with Program Managers, Contracting Officers, Fee-Determining Officials, and Defense Contract Management Agency.

NAVFAC/USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ-0) CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)

1. Contractor Information Firm Name: CAGE Code:

Address: DUNs Number:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:

2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain) Percent of project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):

3. Contract Information Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please specify):

Contract Title:

Contract Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Explain Differences:

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):

Explain Differences:

4. Project Description:

Complexity of Work High Med Routine How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)

CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)

5. Client Information Name:

Title:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

6. Describe the client’s role in the project:

7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):

8. Client’s Signature:

NOTE: NAVFAC/USACE REQUESTS THAT THE CLIENT COMPLETES THIS QUESTIONNAIRE AND SUBMITS DIRECTLY BACK TO THE OFFEROR. THE OFFEROR WILL SUBMIT THE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO USACE WITH THEIR PROPOSAL, AND MAY DUPLICATE THIS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FUTURE SUBMISSION ON USACE SOLICITATIONS.

CLIENTS ARE HIGHLY ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT QUESTIONNAIRES DIRECTLY TO THE OFFEROR. HOWEVER, QUESTIONNAIRES MAY BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO USACE. PLEASE CONTACT THE OFFEROR FOR USACE POC INFORMATION. THE GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO VERIFY ANY AND ALL INFORMATION ON THIS FORM.

RATING DEFINITION NOTE

(E) Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.

An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

(VG) Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.

(S) Satisfactory Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.

(M) Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.

(U) Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.

(N) Not Applicable

No information or did not apply to your contract

Rating will be neither positive nor negative.

ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE

TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT

PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.

1. QUALITY:

a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts E VG S M U N

b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance E VG S M U N

c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance

E VG S M U N

d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance)

E VG S M U N

2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below)

b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract

E VG S M U N

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project? E VG S M U N

b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes;

responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication)

c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer?

E VG S M U N

d) Overall customer satisfaction E VG S M U N

4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR

a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force?

E VG S M U N

b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort E VG S M U N

c) Government Property Control E VG S M U N

d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel E VG S M U N

e) Utilization of Small Business concerns E VG S M U N

f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines E VG S M U N

g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes

E VG S M U N

h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)

E VG S M U N

5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)?

E VG S M U N

b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client

E VG S M U N

c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns)

d) Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section.

Yes

No

e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.

f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below.

6. SAFETY/SECURITY

a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues?

(Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.)

E

VG

S

M

U

N

b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements.

E VG S M U N

7. GENERAL

a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues).

E

VG

S

M

U

N

b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues) E VG S M U N

c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below) Yes No

d) In summary, provide an overall rating…